Why have global shark and ray landings declined: improved management or overfishing?
Global chondrichthyan (shark, ray, skate and chimaera) landings, reported to the United Nations Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO), peaked in 2003 and in the decade since have declined by almost 20%. In the FAO's 2012 ‘State of the World's Fisheries and Aquaculture’ report, the author...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Fish and fisheries (Oxford, England) England), 2016-06, Vol.17 (2), p.438-458 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 458 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 438 |
container_title | Fish and fisheries (Oxford, England) |
container_volume | 17 |
creator | Davidson, Lindsay N K Krawchuk, Meg A Dulvy, Nicholas K |
description | Global chondrichthyan (shark, ray, skate and chimaera) landings, reported to the United Nations Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO), peaked in 2003 and in the decade since have declined by almost 20%. In the FAO's 2012 ‘State of the World's Fisheries and Aquaculture’ report, the authors ‘hoped’ the reductions in landings were partially due to management implementation rather than population decline. Here, we tested their hypothesis. Post‐peak chondrichthyan landings trajectories from 126 countries were modelled against seven indirect and direct fishing pressure measures and eleven measures of fisheries management performance, while accounting for ecosystem attributes. We found the recent improvement in international or national fisheries management was not yet strong enough to account for the recent decline in chondrichthyan landings. Instead, the landings declines were more closely related to fishing pressure and ecosystem attribute measures. Countries with the greatest declines had high human coastal population sizes or high shark and ray meat exports such as Pakistan, Sri Lanka and Thailand. While important progress had been made, country‐level fisheries management measures did not yet have the strength or coverage to halt overfishing and avert population declines of chondrichthyans. Increased implementation of legally binding operational fisheries management and species‐specific reporting is urgently required to avoid declines and ensure fisheries sustainability and food security. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/faf.12119 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1787983377</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1787983377</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4699-2c6447c892d3fa2db27cc2be351fe3eaae8fab843afa5455cf5b65546153b5ca3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kM1OwzAQhCMEElA48AaWuMAhJY7tOOaCENACquBS4GhtnHWbkh-wW6Bvj0uBAxJ72dHqm9VoouiAJn0a5sSC7dOUUrUR7VCeyThVUm3-6izZjna9nyVJkuWU70Tjp-mSTOENyaTuCqiJn4J7JtCWxMGS1EFU7cSTEk1dtViekqp5cd0blqSBFibYYDsnnSPh5Gzlp4E-24u2LNQe9793L3oYXI0vruPR_fDm4nwUG54pFacm41yaXKUls5CWRSqNSQtkglpkCIC5hSLnDCwILoSxosiE4BkVrBAGWC86Wv8NiV4X6Oe6qbzBOqTGbuE1lblUOWNSBvTwDzrrFq4N6VYUTyhXbEUdrynjOu8dWv3iqgbcUtNEr_rVoV_91W9gT9bse1Xj8n9QD84HP4547aj8HD9-HaFvnUkmhX66G-rhJbu9GzOlH9knfDOLKw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1784014937</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Why have global shark and ray landings declined: improved management or overfishing?</title><source>Wiley Online Library All Journals</source><creator>Davidson, Lindsay N K ; Krawchuk, Meg A ; Dulvy, Nicholas K</creator><creatorcontrib>Davidson, Lindsay N K ; Krawchuk, Meg A ; Dulvy, Nicholas K</creatorcontrib><description>Global chondrichthyan (shark, ray, skate and chimaera) landings, reported to the United Nations Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO), peaked in 2003 and in the decade since have declined by almost 20%. In the FAO's 2012 ‘State of the World's Fisheries and Aquaculture’ report, the authors ‘hoped’ the reductions in landings were partially due to management implementation rather than population decline. Here, we tested their hypothesis. Post‐peak chondrichthyan landings trajectories from 126 countries were modelled against seven indirect and direct fishing pressure measures and eleven measures of fisheries management performance, while accounting for ecosystem attributes. We found the recent improvement in international or national fisheries management was not yet strong enough to account for the recent decline in chondrichthyan landings. Instead, the landings declines were more closely related to fishing pressure and ecosystem attribute measures. Countries with the greatest declines had high human coastal population sizes or high shark and ray meat exports such as Pakistan, Sri Lanka and Thailand. While important progress had been made, country‐level fisheries management measures did not yet have the strength or coverage to halt overfishing and avert population declines of chondrichthyans. Increased implementation of legally binding operational fisheries management and species‐specific reporting is urgently required to avoid declines and ensure fisheries sustainability and food security.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1467-2960</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1467-2979</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/faf.12119</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Chimaera ; Chondrichthyes ; Commercial fishing ; Conservation ; Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species ; elasmobranch ; fin trade ; Fisheries management ; fishing mortality ; Marine ; Marine conservation ; National Plans of Action ; Sharks</subject><ispartof>Fish and fisheries (Oxford, England), 2016-06, Vol.17 (2), p.438-458</ispartof><rights>2015 John Wiley & Sons Ltd</rights><rights>Copyright © 2016 John Wiley & Sons Ltd</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4699-2c6447c892d3fa2db27cc2be351fe3eaae8fab843afa5455cf5b65546153b5ca3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4699-2c6447c892d3fa2db27cc2be351fe3eaae8fab843afa5455cf5b65546153b5ca3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Ffaf.12119$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Ffaf.12119$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,27924,27925,45574,45575</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Davidson, Lindsay N K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Krawchuk, Meg A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dulvy, Nicholas K</creatorcontrib><title>Why have global shark and ray landings declined: improved management or overfishing?</title><title>Fish and fisheries (Oxford, England)</title><addtitle>Fish Fish</addtitle><description>Global chondrichthyan (shark, ray, skate and chimaera) landings, reported to the United Nations Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO), peaked in 2003 and in the decade since have declined by almost 20%. In the FAO's 2012 ‘State of the World's Fisheries and Aquaculture’ report, the authors ‘hoped’ the reductions in landings were partially due to management implementation rather than population decline. Here, we tested their hypothesis. Post‐peak chondrichthyan landings trajectories from 126 countries were modelled against seven indirect and direct fishing pressure measures and eleven measures of fisheries management performance, while accounting for ecosystem attributes. We found the recent improvement in international or national fisheries management was not yet strong enough to account for the recent decline in chondrichthyan landings. Instead, the landings declines were more closely related to fishing pressure and ecosystem attribute measures. Countries with the greatest declines had high human coastal population sizes or high shark and ray meat exports such as Pakistan, Sri Lanka and Thailand. While important progress had been made, country‐level fisheries management measures did not yet have the strength or coverage to halt overfishing and avert population declines of chondrichthyans. Increased implementation of legally binding operational fisheries management and species‐specific reporting is urgently required to avoid declines and ensure fisheries sustainability and food security.</description><subject>Chimaera</subject><subject>Chondrichthyes</subject><subject>Commercial fishing</subject><subject>Conservation</subject><subject>Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species</subject><subject>elasmobranch</subject><subject>fin trade</subject><subject>Fisheries management</subject><subject>fishing mortality</subject><subject>Marine</subject><subject>Marine conservation</subject><subject>National Plans of Action</subject><subject>Sharks</subject><issn>1467-2960</issn><issn>1467-2979</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kM1OwzAQhCMEElA48AaWuMAhJY7tOOaCENACquBS4GhtnHWbkh-wW6Bvj0uBAxJ72dHqm9VoouiAJn0a5sSC7dOUUrUR7VCeyThVUm3-6izZjna9nyVJkuWU70Tjp-mSTOENyaTuCqiJn4J7JtCWxMGS1EFU7cSTEk1dtViekqp5cd0blqSBFibYYDsnnSPh5Gzlp4E-24u2LNQe9793L3oYXI0vruPR_fDm4nwUG54pFacm41yaXKUls5CWRSqNSQtkglpkCIC5hSLnDCwILoSxosiE4BkVrBAGWC86Wv8NiV4X6Oe6qbzBOqTGbuE1lblUOWNSBvTwDzrrFq4N6VYUTyhXbEUdrynjOu8dWv3iqgbcUtNEr_rVoV_91W9gT9bse1Xj8n9QD84HP4547aj8HD9-HaFvnUkmhX66G-rhJbu9GzOlH9knfDOLKw</recordid><startdate>201606</startdate><enddate>201606</enddate><creator>Davidson, Lindsay N K</creator><creator>Krawchuk, Meg A</creator><creator>Dulvy, Nicholas K</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QH</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7TN</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H95</scope><scope>H98</scope><scope>H99</scope><scope>L.F</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7U6</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201606</creationdate><title>Why have global shark and ray landings declined: improved management or overfishing?</title><author>Davidson, Lindsay N K ; Krawchuk, Meg A ; Dulvy, Nicholas K</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4699-2c6447c892d3fa2db27cc2be351fe3eaae8fab843afa5455cf5b65546153b5ca3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Chimaera</topic><topic>Chondrichthyes</topic><topic>Commercial fishing</topic><topic>Conservation</topic><topic>Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species</topic><topic>elasmobranch</topic><topic>fin trade</topic><topic>Fisheries management</topic><topic>fishing mortality</topic><topic>Marine</topic><topic>Marine conservation</topic><topic>National Plans of Action</topic><topic>Sharks</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Davidson, Lindsay N K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Krawchuk, Meg A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dulvy, Nicholas K</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Aqualine</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Oceanic Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 1: Biological Sciences & Living Resources</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Aquaculture Abstracts</collection><collection>ASFA: Marine Biotechnology Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Marine Biotechnology Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Sustainability Science Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Fish and fisheries (Oxford, England)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Davidson, Lindsay N K</au><au>Krawchuk, Meg A</au><au>Dulvy, Nicholas K</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Why have global shark and ray landings declined: improved management or overfishing?</atitle><jtitle>Fish and fisheries (Oxford, England)</jtitle><addtitle>Fish Fish</addtitle><date>2016-06</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>17</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>438</spage><epage>458</epage><pages>438-458</pages><issn>1467-2960</issn><eissn>1467-2979</eissn><abstract>Global chondrichthyan (shark, ray, skate and chimaera) landings, reported to the United Nations Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO), peaked in 2003 and in the decade since have declined by almost 20%. In the FAO's 2012 ‘State of the World's Fisheries and Aquaculture’ report, the authors ‘hoped’ the reductions in landings were partially due to management implementation rather than population decline. Here, we tested their hypothesis. Post‐peak chondrichthyan landings trajectories from 126 countries were modelled against seven indirect and direct fishing pressure measures and eleven measures of fisheries management performance, while accounting for ecosystem attributes. We found the recent improvement in international or national fisheries management was not yet strong enough to account for the recent decline in chondrichthyan landings. Instead, the landings declines were more closely related to fishing pressure and ecosystem attribute measures. Countries with the greatest declines had high human coastal population sizes or high shark and ray meat exports such as Pakistan, Sri Lanka and Thailand. While important progress had been made, country‐level fisheries management measures did not yet have the strength or coverage to halt overfishing and avert population declines of chondrichthyans. Increased implementation of legally binding operational fisheries management and species‐specific reporting is urgently required to avoid declines and ensure fisheries sustainability and food security.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><doi>10.1111/faf.12119</doi><tpages>21</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1467-2960 |
ispartof | Fish and fisheries (Oxford, England), 2016-06, Vol.17 (2), p.438-458 |
issn | 1467-2960 1467-2979 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1787983377 |
source | Wiley Online Library All Journals |
subjects | Chimaera Chondrichthyes Commercial fishing Conservation Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species elasmobranch fin trade Fisheries management fishing mortality Marine Marine conservation National Plans of Action Sharks |
title | Why have global shark and ray landings declined: improved management or overfishing? |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T03%3A05%3A39IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Why%20have%20global%20shark%20and%20ray%20landings%20declined:%20improved%20management%20or%20overfishing?&rft.jtitle=Fish%20and%20fisheries%20(Oxford,%20England)&rft.au=Davidson,%20Lindsay%20N%20K&rft.date=2016-06&rft.volume=17&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=438&rft.epage=458&rft.pages=438-458&rft.issn=1467-2960&rft.eissn=1467-2979&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/faf.12119&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1787983377%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1784014937&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |