Why have global shark and ray landings declined: improved management or overfishing?

Global chondrichthyan (shark, ray, skate and chimaera) landings, reported to the United Nations Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO), peaked in 2003 and in the decade since have declined by almost 20%. In the FAO's 2012 ‘State of the World's Fisheries and Aquaculture’ report, the author...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Fish and fisheries (Oxford, England) England), 2016-06, Vol.17 (2), p.438-458
Hauptverfasser: Davidson, Lindsay N K, Krawchuk, Meg A, Dulvy, Nicholas K
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 458
container_issue 2
container_start_page 438
container_title Fish and fisheries (Oxford, England)
container_volume 17
creator Davidson, Lindsay N K
Krawchuk, Meg A
Dulvy, Nicholas K
description Global chondrichthyan (shark, ray, skate and chimaera) landings, reported to the United Nations Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO), peaked in 2003 and in the decade since have declined by almost 20%. In the FAO's 2012 ‘State of the World's Fisheries and Aquaculture’ report, the authors ‘hoped’ the reductions in landings were partially due to management implementation rather than population decline. Here, we tested their hypothesis. Post‐peak chondrichthyan landings trajectories from 126 countries were modelled against seven indirect and direct fishing pressure measures and eleven measures of fisheries management performance, while accounting for ecosystem attributes. We found the recent improvement in international or national fisheries management was not yet strong enough to account for the recent decline in chondrichthyan landings. Instead, the landings declines were more closely related to fishing pressure and ecosystem attribute measures. Countries with the greatest declines had high human coastal population sizes or high shark and ray meat exports such as Pakistan, Sri Lanka and Thailand. While important progress had been made, country‐level fisheries management measures did not yet have the strength or coverage to halt overfishing and avert population declines of chondrichthyans. Increased implementation of legally binding operational fisheries management and species‐specific reporting is urgently required to avoid declines and ensure fisheries sustainability and food security.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/faf.12119
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1787983377</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1787983377</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4699-2c6447c892d3fa2db27cc2be351fe3eaae8fab843afa5455cf5b65546153b5ca3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kM1OwzAQhCMEElA48AaWuMAhJY7tOOaCENACquBS4GhtnHWbkh-wW6Bvj0uBAxJ72dHqm9VoouiAJn0a5sSC7dOUUrUR7VCeyThVUm3-6izZjna9nyVJkuWU70Tjp-mSTOENyaTuCqiJn4J7JtCWxMGS1EFU7cSTEk1dtViekqp5cd0blqSBFibYYDsnnSPh5Gzlp4E-24u2LNQe9793L3oYXI0vruPR_fDm4nwUG54pFacm41yaXKUls5CWRSqNSQtkglpkCIC5hSLnDCwILoSxosiE4BkVrBAGWC86Wv8NiV4X6Oe6qbzBOqTGbuE1lblUOWNSBvTwDzrrFq4N6VYUTyhXbEUdrynjOu8dWv3iqgbcUtNEr_rVoV_91W9gT9bse1Xj8n9QD84HP4547aj8HD9-HaFvnUkmhX66G-rhJbu9GzOlH9knfDOLKw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1784014937</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Why have global shark and ray landings declined: improved management or overfishing?</title><source>Wiley Online Library All Journals</source><creator>Davidson, Lindsay N K ; Krawchuk, Meg A ; Dulvy, Nicholas K</creator><creatorcontrib>Davidson, Lindsay N K ; Krawchuk, Meg A ; Dulvy, Nicholas K</creatorcontrib><description>Global chondrichthyan (shark, ray, skate and chimaera) landings, reported to the United Nations Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO), peaked in 2003 and in the decade since have declined by almost 20%. In the FAO's 2012 ‘State of the World's Fisheries and Aquaculture’ report, the authors ‘hoped’ the reductions in landings were partially due to management implementation rather than population decline. Here, we tested their hypothesis. Post‐peak chondrichthyan landings trajectories from 126 countries were modelled against seven indirect and direct fishing pressure measures and eleven measures of fisheries management performance, while accounting for ecosystem attributes. We found the recent improvement in international or national fisheries management was not yet strong enough to account for the recent decline in chondrichthyan landings. Instead, the landings declines were more closely related to fishing pressure and ecosystem attribute measures. Countries with the greatest declines had high human coastal population sizes or high shark and ray meat exports such as Pakistan, Sri Lanka and Thailand. While important progress had been made, country‐level fisheries management measures did not yet have the strength or coverage to halt overfishing and avert population declines of chondrichthyans. Increased implementation of legally binding operational fisheries management and species‐specific reporting is urgently required to avoid declines and ensure fisheries sustainability and food security.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1467-2960</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1467-2979</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/faf.12119</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Chimaera ; Chondrichthyes ; Commercial fishing ; Conservation ; Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species ; elasmobranch ; fin trade ; Fisheries management ; fishing mortality ; Marine ; Marine conservation ; National Plans of Action ; Sharks</subject><ispartof>Fish and fisheries (Oxford, England), 2016-06, Vol.17 (2), p.438-458</ispartof><rights>2015 John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd</rights><rights>Copyright © 2016 John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4699-2c6447c892d3fa2db27cc2be351fe3eaae8fab843afa5455cf5b65546153b5ca3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4699-2c6447c892d3fa2db27cc2be351fe3eaae8fab843afa5455cf5b65546153b5ca3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Ffaf.12119$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Ffaf.12119$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,27924,27925,45574,45575</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Davidson, Lindsay N K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Krawchuk, Meg A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dulvy, Nicholas K</creatorcontrib><title>Why have global shark and ray landings declined: improved management or overfishing?</title><title>Fish and fisheries (Oxford, England)</title><addtitle>Fish Fish</addtitle><description>Global chondrichthyan (shark, ray, skate and chimaera) landings, reported to the United Nations Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO), peaked in 2003 and in the decade since have declined by almost 20%. In the FAO's 2012 ‘State of the World's Fisheries and Aquaculture’ report, the authors ‘hoped’ the reductions in landings were partially due to management implementation rather than population decline. Here, we tested their hypothesis. Post‐peak chondrichthyan landings trajectories from 126 countries were modelled against seven indirect and direct fishing pressure measures and eleven measures of fisheries management performance, while accounting for ecosystem attributes. We found the recent improvement in international or national fisheries management was not yet strong enough to account for the recent decline in chondrichthyan landings. Instead, the landings declines were more closely related to fishing pressure and ecosystem attribute measures. Countries with the greatest declines had high human coastal population sizes or high shark and ray meat exports such as Pakistan, Sri Lanka and Thailand. While important progress had been made, country‐level fisheries management measures did not yet have the strength or coverage to halt overfishing and avert population declines of chondrichthyans. Increased implementation of legally binding operational fisheries management and species‐specific reporting is urgently required to avoid declines and ensure fisheries sustainability and food security.</description><subject>Chimaera</subject><subject>Chondrichthyes</subject><subject>Commercial fishing</subject><subject>Conservation</subject><subject>Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species</subject><subject>elasmobranch</subject><subject>fin trade</subject><subject>Fisheries management</subject><subject>fishing mortality</subject><subject>Marine</subject><subject>Marine conservation</subject><subject>National Plans of Action</subject><subject>Sharks</subject><issn>1467-2960</issn><issn>1467-2979</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kM1OwzAQhCMEElA48AaWuMAhJY7tOOaCENACquBS4GhtnHWbkh-wW6Bvj0uBAxJ72dHqm9VoouiAJn0a5sSC7dOUUrUR7VCeyThVUm3-6izZjna9nyVJkuWU70Tjp-mSTOENyaTuCqiJn4J7JtCWxMGS1EFU7cSTEk1dtViekqp5cd0blqSBFibYYDsnnSPh5Gzlp4E-24u2LNQe9793L3oYXI0vruPR_fDm4nwUG54pFacm41yaXKUls5CWRSqNSQtkglpkCIC5hSLnDCwILoSxosiE4BkVrBAGWC86Wv8NiV4X6Oe6qbzBOqTGbuE1lblUOWNSBvTwDzrrFq4N6VYUTyhXbEUdrynjOu8dWv3iqgbcUtNEr_rVoV_91W9gT9bse1Xj8n9QD84HP4547aj8HD9-HaFvnUkmhX66G-rhJbu9GzOlH9knfDOLKw</recordid><startdate>201606</startdate><enddate>201606</enddate><creator>Davidson, Lindsay N K</creator><creator>Krawchuk, Meg A</creator><creator>Dulvy, Nicholas K</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QH</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7TN</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H95</scope><scope>H98</scope><scope>H99</scope><scope>L.F</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7U6</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201606</creationdate><title>Why have global shark and ray landings declined: improved management or overfishing?</title><author>Davidson, Lindsay N K ; Krawchuk, Meg A ; Dulvy, Nicholas K</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4699-2c6447c892d3fa2db27cc2be351fe3eaae8fab843afa5455cf5b65546153b5ca3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Chimaera</topic><topic>Chondrichthyes</topic><topic>Commercial fishing</topic><topic>Conservation</topic><topic>Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species</topic><topic>elasmobranch</topic><topic>fin trade</topic><topic>Fisheries management</topic><topic>fishing mortality</topic><topic>Marine</topic><topic>Marine conservation</topic><topic>National Plans of Action</topic><topic>Sharks</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Davidson, Lindsay N K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Krawchuk, Meg A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dulvy, Nicholas K</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Aqualine</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Oceanic Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 1: Biological Sciences &amp; Living Resources</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Aquaculture Abstracts</collection><collection>ASFA: Marine Biotechnology Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Marine Biotechnology Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Sustainability Science Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Fish and fisheries (Oxford, England)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Davidson, Lindsay N K</au><au>Krawchuk, Meg A</au><au>Dulvy, Nicholas K</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Why have global shark and ray landings declined: improved management or overfishing?</atitle><jtitle>Fish and fisheries (Oxford, England)</jtitle><addtitle>Fish Fish</addtitle><date>2016-06</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>17</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>438</spage><epage>458</epage><pages>438-458</pages><issn>1467-2960</issn><eissn>1467-2979</eissn><abstract>Global chondrichthyan (shark, ray, skate and chimaera) landings, reported to the United Nations Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO), peaked in 2003 and in the decade since have declined by almost 20%. In the FAO's 2012 ‘State of the World's Fisheries and Aquaculture’ report, the authors ‘hoped’ the reductions in landings were partially due to management implementation rather than population decline. Here, we tested their hypothesis. Post‐peak chondrichthyan landings trajectories from 126 countries were modelled against seven indirect and direct fishing pressure measures and eleven measures of fisheries management performance, while accounting for ecosystem attributes. We found the recent improvement in international or national fisheries management was not yet strong enough to account for the recent decline in chondrichthyan landings. Instead, the landings declines were more closely related to fishing pressure and ecosystem attribute measures. Countries with the greatest declines had high human coastal population sizes or high shark and ray meat exports such as Pakistan, Sri Lanka and Thailand. While important progress had been made, country‐level fisheries management measures did not yet have the strength or coverage to halt overfishing and avert population declines of chondrichthyans. Increased implementation of legally binding operational fisheries management and species‐specific reporting is urgently required to avoid declines and ensure fisheries sustainability and food security.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><doi>10.1111/faf.12119</doi><tpages>21</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1467-2960
ispartof Fish and fisheries (Oxford, England), 2016-06, Vol.17 (2), p.438-458
issn 1467-2960
1467-2979
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1787983377
source Wiley Online Library All Journals
subjects Chimaera
Chondrichthyes
Commercial fishing
Conservation
Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species
elasmobranch
fin trade
Fisheries management
fishing mortality
Marine
Marine conservation
National Plans of Action
Sharks
title Why have global shark and ray landings declined: improved management or overfishing?
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T03%3A05%3A39IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Why%20have%20global%20shark%20and%20ray%20landings%20declined:%20improved%20management%20or%20overfishing?&rft.jtitle=Fish%20and%20fisheries%20(Oxford,%20England)&rft.au=Davidson,%20Lindsay%20N%20K&rft.date=2016-06&rft.volume=17&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=438&rft.epage=458&rft.pages=438-458&rft.issn=1467-2960&rft.eissn=1467-2979&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/faf.12119&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1787983377%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1784014937&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true