Effects of different straw returning modes on greenhouse gas emissions and crop yields in a rice–wheat rotation system

•Study the effects of straw ditch-buried returning (WD) on GHG emissions.•WD reduced CH4 emission compared to WR and WP.•WD had a significantly lower yield-scaled GWP than WR.•WD may be a feasible practice to reduce GHG emission and sustain crop yields. Significant efforts have been made to assess t...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Agriculture, ecosystems & environment ecosystems & environment, 2016-05, Vol.223, p.115-122
Hauptverfasser: Hu, Naijuan, Wang, Baojun, Gu, Zehai, Tao, Baorui, Zhang, Zhengwen, Hu, Shuijin, Zhu, Liqun, Meng, Yali
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 122
container_issue
container_start_page 115
container_title Agriculture, ecosystems & environment
container_volume 223
creator Hu, Naijuan
Wang, Baojun
Gu, Zehai
Tao, Baorui
Zhang, Zhengwen
Hu, Shuijin
Zhu, Liqun
Meng, Yali
description •Study the effects of straw ditch-buried returning (WD) on GHG emissions.•WD reduced CH4 emission compared to WR and WP.•WD had a significantly lower yield-scaled GWP than WR.•WD may be a feasible practice to reduce GHG emission and sustain crop yields. Significant efforts have been made to assess the common straw returning modes on crop yields and greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. However, the effects of a novel straw returning mode, namely ditch-buried straw returning on GHG emissions are still unknown. We conducted a 2-year field experiment, including four wheat straw returning modes (no straw returning (CK), wheat straw returning with rotary tillage (WR), wheat straw returning with plowing (WP), and ditch-buried wheat straw returning (WD)) to evaluate crop yields and GHG emissions under rice–wheat rotation system. Methane (CH4) and nitrous oxide (N2O) fluxes were measured using the static chamber method from the 2013 rice season to 2015 wheat season. The results indicated that wheat straw returning treatments before rice transplantation significantly increased seasonal CH4 emissions during both the rice seasons and wheat seasons, compared to CK. Annual CH4 emission was lower under WD than that under WR and WP. Straw returning significantly increased N2O emission during the first rice season and second wheat season, compared to CK. Annual N2O emission under WD was significantly lower than that under WP, but significantly higher than that under WR and CK. Straw returning increased both rice and wheat yields compared with CK, and WD had significantly higher annual grain yields of both rice and wheat, with an increase of 7.1%. Across the two rotation cycles, annual yield-scaled GWP of CH4 and N2O emissions under WD was 10.8% lower than that of WR. These results indicated that compared with straw returning via rotary tillage or plowing, ditch-buried wheat straw in rice seasons may reduce GHG emissions while sustaining or even increasing crop yields in the rice–wheat rotation system.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.agee.2016.02.027
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1787981426</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0167880916301098</els_id><sourcerecordid>1787981426</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c399t-35dac9d7a4e8b9b2fc96d38c4e08826bacbc9d6f9fa34237304b13563d126acb3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9UE1rGzEQFSWBOk7-QE465rKOPta7WuglBOcDDL20Z6GVZh0ZW-tq5Lq-5T_kH_aXdIx7zjAwA--9Yd5j7FaKmRSyuV_P3ApgpmifCUXdfmETaVpdKS3mF2xCQFsZI7qv7ApxLaiUNhP2ZzEM4AvyceAh0p4hFY4luwPPUPY5xbTi2zEAURJfZYD0Nu4R-Mohh21EjGNC7lLgPo87foywCchj4o7n6OHv-8fhDVzheSyuEJfjEQtsr9nl4DYIN__nlP18Wvx4fKmW359fHx-WldddVyo9D853oXU1mL7r1eC7JmjjaxDGqKZ3vie4GbrB6VrpVou6l3re6CBVQ6Cesrvz3V0ef-0Bi6WfPWw2LgH5sLI1bWdkrRqiqjOVjCBmGOwux63LRyuFPcVs1_YUsz3FbIWibkn07SwCMvE7QrboIyQPIWYK1oYxfib_B6APidw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1787981426</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Effects of different straw returning modes on greenhouse gas emissions and crop yields in a rice–wheat rotation system</title><source>ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)</source><creator>Hu, Naijuan ; Wang, Baojun ; Gu, Zehai ; Tao, Baorui ; Zhang, Zhengwen ; Hu, Shuijin ; Zhu, Liqun ; Meng, Yali</creator><creatorcontrib>Hu, Naijuan ; Wang, Baojun ; Gu, Zehai ; Tao, Baorui ; Zhang, Zhengwen ; Hu, Shuijin ; Zhu, Liqun ; Meng, Yali</creatorcontrib><description>•Study the effects of straw ditch-buried returning (WD) on GHG emissions.•WD reduced CH4 emission compared to WR and WP.•WD had a significantly lower yield-scaled GWP than WR.•WD may be a feasible practice to reduce GHG emission and sustain crop yields. Significant efforts have been made to assess the common straw returning modes on crop yields and greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. However, the effects of a novel straw returning mode, namely ditch-buried straw returning on GHG emissions are still unknown. We conducted a 2-year field experiment, including four wheat straw returning modes (no straw returning (CK), wheat straw returning with rotary tillage (WR), wheat straw returning with plowing (WP), and ditch-buried wheat straw returning (WD)) to evaluate crop yields and GHG emissions under rice–wheat rotation system. Methane (CH4) and nitrous oxide (N2O) fluxes were measured using the static chamber method from the 2013 rice season to 2015 wheat season. The results indicated that wheat straw returning treatments before rice transplantation significantly increased seasonal CH4 emissions during both the rice seasons and wheat seasons, compared to CK. Annual CH4 emission was lower under WD than that under WR and WP. Straw returning significantly increased N2O emission during the first rice season and second wheat season, compared to CK. Annual N2O emission under WD was significantly lower than that under WP, but significantly higher than that under WR and CK. Straw returning increased both rice and wheat yields compared with CK, and WD had significantly higher annual grain yields of both rice and wheat, with an increase of 7.1%. Across the two rotation cycles, annual yield-scaled GWP of CH4 and N2O emissions under WD was 10.8% lower than that of WR. These results indicated that compared with straw returning via rotary tillage or plowing, ditch-buried wheat straw in rice seasons may reduce GHG emissions while sustaining or even increasing crop yields in the rice–wheat rotation system.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0167-8809</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-2305</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.agee.2016.02.027</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Global warming potential ; Methane ; Nitrous oxide ; Rice–wheat rotation ; Straw returning modes ; Triticum aestivum</subject><ispartof>Agriculture, ecosystems &amp; environment, 2016-05, Vol.223, p.115-122</ispartof><rights>2016 Elsevier B.V.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c399t-35dac9d7a4e8b9b2fc96d38c4e08826bacbc9d6f9fa34237304b13563d126acb3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c399t-35dac9d7a4e8b9b2fc96d38c4e08826bacbc9d6f9fa34237304b13563d126acb3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2016.02.027$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hu, Naijuan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Baojun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gu, Zehai</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tao, Baorui</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Zhengwen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hu, Shuijin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhu, Liqun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Meng, Yali</creatorcontrib><title>Effects of different straw returning modes on greenhouse gas emissions and crop yields in a rice–wheat rotation system</title><title>Agriculture, ecosystems &amp; environment</title><description>•Study the effects of straw ditch-buried returning (WD) on GHG emissions.•WD reduced CH4 emission compared to WR and WP.•WD had a significantly lower yield-scaled GWP than WR.•WD may be a feasible practice to reduce GHG emission and sustain crop yields. Significant efforts have been made to assess the common straw returning modes on crop yields and greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. However, the effects of a novel straw returning mode, namely ditch-buried straw returning on GHG emissions are still unknown. We conducted a 2-year field experiment, including four wheat straw returning modes (no straw returning (CK), wheat straw returning with rotary tillage (WR), wheat straw returning with plowing (WP), and ditch-buried wheat straw returning (WD)) to evaluate crop yields and GHG emissions under rice–wheat rotation system. Methane (CH4) and nitrous oxide (N2O) fluxes were measured using the static chamber method from the 2013 rice season to 2015 wheat season. The results indicated that wheat straw returning treatments before rice transplantation significantly increased seasonal CH4 emissions during both the rice seasons and wheat seasons, compared to CK. Annual CH4 emission was lower under WD than that under WR and WP. Straw returning significantly increased N2O emission during the first rice season and second wheat season, compared to CK. Annual N2O emission under WD was significantly lower than that under WP, but significantly higher than that under WR and CK. Straw returning increased both rice and wheat yields compared with CK, and WD had significantly higher annual grain yields of both rice and wheat, with an increase of 7.1%. Across the two rotation cycles, annual yield-scaled GWP of CH4 and N2O emissions under WD was 10.8% lower than that of WR. These results indicated that compared with straw returning via rotary tillage or plowing, ditch-buried wheat straw in rice seasons may reduce GHG emissions while sustaining or even increasing crop yields in the rice–wheat rotation system.</description><subject>Global warming potential</subject><subject>Methane</subject><subject>Nitrous oxide</subject><subject>Rice–wheat rotation</subject><subject>Straw returning modes</subject><subject>Triticum aestivum</subject><issn>0167-8809</issn><issn>1873-2305</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9UE1rGzEQFSWBOk7-QE465rKOPta7WuglBOcDDL20Z6GVZh0ZW-tq5Lq-5T_kH_aXdIx7zjAwA--9Yd5j7FaKmRSyuV_P3ApgpmifCUXdfmETaVpdKS3mF2xCQFsZI7qv7ApxLaiUNhP2ZzEM4AvyceAh0p4hFY4luwPPUPY5xbTi2zEAURJfZYD0Nu4R-Mohh21EjGNC7lLgPo87foywCchj4o7n6OHv-8fhDVzheSyuEJfjEQtsr9nl4DYIN__nlP18Wvx4fKmW359fHx-WldddVyo9D853oXU1mL7r1eC7JmjjaxDGqKZ3vie4GbrB6VrpVou6l3re6CBVQ6Cesrvz3V0ef-0Bi6WfPWw2LgH5sLI1bWdkrRqiqjOVjCBmGOwux63LRyuFPcVs1_YUsz3FbIWibkn07SwCMvE7QrboIyQPIWYK1oYxfib_B6APidw</recordid><startdate>20160501</startdate><enddate>20160501</enddate><creator>Hu, Naijuan</creator><creator>Wang, Baojun</creator><creator>Gu, Zehai</creator><creator>Tao, Baorui</creator><creator>Zhang, Zhengwen</creator><creator>Hu, Shuijin</creator><creator>Zhu, Liqun</creator><creator>Meng, Yali</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>SOI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20160501</creationdate><title>Effects of different straw returning modes on greenhouse gas emissions and crop yields in a rice–wheat rotation system</title><author>Hu, Naijuan ; Wang, Baojun ; Gu, Zehai ; Tao, Baorui ; Zhang, Zhengwen ; Hu, Shuijin ; Zhu, Liqun ; Meng, Yali</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c399t-35dac9d7a4e8b9b2fc96d38c4e08826bacbc9d6f9fa34237304b13563d126acb3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Global warming potential</topic><topic>Methane</topic><topic>Nitrous oxide</topic><topic>Rice–wheat rotation</topic><topic>Straw returning modes</topic><topic>Triticum aestivum</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hu, Naijuan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Baojun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gu, Zehai</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tao, Baorui</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Zhengwen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hu, Shuijin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhu, Liqun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Meng, Yali</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Agriculture, ecosystems &amp; environment</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hu, Naijuan</au><au>Wang, Baojun</au><au>Gu, Zehai</au><au>Tao, Baorui</au><au>Zhang, Zhengwen</au><au>Hu, Shuijin</au><au>Zhu, Liqun</au><au>Meng, Yali</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Effects of different straw returning modes on greenhouse gas emissions and crop yields in a rice–wheat rotation system</atitle><jtitle>Agriculture, ecosystems &amp; environment</jtitle><date>2016-05-01</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>223</volume><spage>115</spage><epage>122</epage><pages>115-122</pages><issn>0167-8809</issn><eissn>1873-2305</eissn><abstract>•Study the effects of straw ditch-buried returning (WD) on GHG emissions.•WD reduced CH4 emission compared to WR and WP.•WD had a significantly lower yield-scaled GWP than WR.•WD may be a feasible practice to reduce GHG emission and sustain crop yields. Significant efforts have been made to assess the common straw returning modes on crop yields and greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. However, the effects of a novel straw returning mode, namely ditch-buried straw returning on GHG emissions are still unknown. We conducted a 2-year field experiment, including four wheat straw returning modes (no straw returning (CK), wheat straw returning with rotary tillage (WR), wheat straw returning with plowing (WP), and ditch-buried wheat straw returning (WD)) to evaluate crop yields and GHG emissions under rice–wheat rotation system. Methane (CH4) and nitrous oxide (N2O) fluxes were measured using the static chamber method from the 2013 rice season to 2015 wheat season. The results indicated that wheat straw returning treatments before rice transplantation significantly increased seasonal CH4 emissions during both the rice seasons and wheat seasons, compared to CK. Annual CH4 emission was lower under WD than that under WR and WP. Straw returning significantly increased N2O emission during the first rice season and second wheat season, compared to CK. Annual N2O emission under WD was significantly lower than that under WP, but significantly higher than that under WR and CK. Straw returning increased both rice and wheat yields compared with CK, and WD had significantly higher annual grain yields of both rice and wheat, with an increase of 7.1%. Across the two rotation cycles, annual yield-scaled GWP of CH4 and N2O emissions under WD was 10.8% lower than that of WR. These results indicated that compared with straw returning via rotary tillage or plowing, ditch-buried wheat straw in rice seasons may reduce GHG emissions while sustaining or even increasing crop yields in the rice–wheat rotation system.</abstract><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><doi>10.1016/j.agee.2016.02.027</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0167-8809
ispartof Agriculture, ecosystems & environment, 2016-05, Vol.223, p.115-122
issn 0167-8809
1873-2305
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1787981426
source ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)
subjects Global warming potential
Methane
Nitrous oxide
Rice–wheat rotation
Straw returning modes
Triticum aestivum
title Effects of different straw returning modes on greenhouse gas emissions and crop yields in a rice–wheat rotation system
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-06T16%3A23%3A55IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Effects%20of%20different%20straw%20returning%20modes%20on%20greenhouse%20gas%20emissions%20and%20crop%20yields%20in%20a%20rice%E2%80%93wheat%20rotation%20system&rft.jtitle=Agriculture,%20ecosystems%20&%20environment&rft.au=Hu,%20Naijuan&rft.date=2016-05-01&rft.volume=223&rft.spage=115&rft.epage=122&rft.pages=115-122&rft.issn=0167-8809&rft.eissn=1873-2305&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.agee.2016.02.027&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1787981426%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1787981426&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0167880916301098&rfr_iscdi=true