Safety, Efficacy, and Prognostic Factors After Radioembolization of Hepatic Metastases from Breast Cancer: A Large Single-Center Experience in 81 Patients

The present study evaluated safety, efficacy, and prognostic factors for (90)Y-yttrium microsphere radioembolization of unresectable liver metastases from breast cancer. Eighty-one patients were treated with radioembolization. Acute toxicity was monitored through daily physical examination and serum...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of Nuclear Medicine 2016-04, Vol.57 (4), p.517-523
Hauptverfasser: Fendler, Wolfgang P, Lechner, Hanna, Todica, Andrei, Paprottka, Karolin J, Paprottka, Philipp M, Jakobs, Tobias F, Michl, Marlies, Bartenstein, Peter, Lehner, Sebastian, Haug, Alexander R
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 523
container_issue 4
container_start_page 517
container_title Journal of Nuclear Medicine
container_volume 57
creator Fendler, Wolfgang P
Lechner, Hanna
Todica, Andrei
Paprottka, Karolin J
Paprottka, Philipp M
Jakobs, Tobias F
Michl, Marlies
Bartenstein, Peter
Lehner, Sebastian
Haug, Alexander R
description The present study evaluated safety, efficacy, and prognostic factors for (90)Y-yttrium microsphere radioembolization of unresectable liver metastases from breast cancer. Eighty-one patients were treated with radioembolization. Acute toxicity was monitored through daily physical examination and serum tests until 3 d after radioembolization; late toxicity was evaluated until 12 wk after radioembolization. Overall survival and response according to (18)F-FDG PET (>30% decrease of tracer uptake) and CA15-3 serum level (any decline) were recorded. Pretherapeutic characteristics, including pretreatment history, liver function tests, and PET/CT parameters, were assessed by univariate and subsequent multivariate Cox regression for predicting patient survival. A toxicity grade of 3 or more based on clinical symptoms, bilirubin, ulcer, pancreatitis, ascites, or radioembolization-induced liver disease occurred in 10% or less of patients. Two patients eventually died from radioembolization-induced liver disease. Sequential lobar treatment and absence of prior angiosuppressive therapy were both associated with a lower rate of serious adverse events. On the basis of PET/CA15-3 criteria, 52/61% of patients responded to treatment. Median overall survival after radioembolization was 35 wk (interquartile range, 41 wk). Pretherapeutic tumor burden of the liver greater than 50% or more (P< 0.001; hazard ratio, 5.67; 95% confidence interval, 2.41-13.34) and a transaminase toxicity grade of 2 or more (P= 0.009; hazard ratio, 2.15; 95% confidence interval, 1.21-3.80) independently predicted short survival. Radioembolization for breast cancer liver metastases shows encouraging local response rates with low incidence of serious adverse events, especially in those patients with sequential lobar treatment or without prior angiosuppressive therapy. High hepatic tumor burden and liver transaminase levels at baseline indicate poor outcome.
doi_str_mv 10.2967/jnumed.115.165050
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1787979905</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>4029435101</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c405t-6a00e341682e0fbb9eec93e4518298d44c02cd04a6f8965369a076bf5f22a3603</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkdGK1DAUhoMo7uzqA3gjAW-82I4naZOm3o3DrCuMuLh6XdL0ZMjQJmPSguuj-LSmzO6NJJCE_zs_gY-QNwzWvJH1h6OfR-zXjIk1kwIEPCMrJkpRCCnr52QFTLJC5OCCXKZ0BACplHpJLrisK14zWJG_99ri9HBNd9Y6o02-ad_TuxgOPqTJGXqjzRRiohs7YaTfde8Cjl0Y3B89ueBpsPQWT3pBv-KkU96YqI1hpJ8i5jfdam8wfqQbutfxgPTe-cOAxRb90rj7fcLoMCPUeaoYvctdOUqvyAurh4SvH88r8vNm92N7W-y_ff6y3ewLU4GYCqkBsKyYVBzBdl2DaJoSK8EUb1RfVQa46aHS0qpGilI2GmrZWWE516WE8oq8P_eeYvg1Y5ra0SWDw6A9hjm1rFZ1UzcNiIy--w89hjn6_LuF4nmVSmWKnSkTQ0oRbXuKbtTxoWXQLuLas7g2i2vP4vLM28fmuVuip4knU-U_5j6VGw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1782828388</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Safety, Efficacy, and Prognostic Factors After Radioembolization of Hepatic Metastases from Breast Cancer: A Large Single-Center Experience in 81 Patients</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><source>EZB Electronic Journals Library</source><creator>Fendler, Wolfgang P ; Lechner, Hanna ; Todica, Andrei ; Paprottka, Karolin J ; Paprottka, Philipp M ; Jakobs, Tobias F ; Michl, Marlies ; Bartenstein, Peter ; Lehner, Sebastian ; Haug, Alexander R</creator><creatorcontrib>Fendler, Wolfgang P ; Lechner, Hanna ; Todica, Andrei ; Paprottka, Karolin J ; Paprottka, Philipp M ; Jakobs, Tobias F ; Michl, Marlies ; Bartenstein, Peter ; Lehner, Sebastian ; Haug, Alexander R</creatorcontrib><description>The present study evaluated safety, efficacy, and prognostic factors for (90)Y-yttrium microsphere radioembolization of unresectable liver metastases from breast cancer. Eighty-one patients were treated with radioembolization. Acute toxicity was monitored through daily physical examination and serum tests until 3 d after radioembolization; late toxicity was evaluated until 12 wk after radioembolization. Overall survival and response according to (18)F-FDG PET (&gt;30% decrease of tracer uptake) and CA15-3 serum level (any decline) were recorded. Pretherapeutic characteristics, including pretreatment history, liver function tests, and PET/CT parameters, were assessed by univariate and subsequent multivariate Cox regression for predicting patient survival. A toxicity grade of 3 or more based on clinical symptoms, bilirubin, ulcer, pancreatitis, ascites, or radioembolization-induced liver disease occurred in 10% or less of patients. Two patients eventually died from radioembolization-induced liver disease. Sequential lobar treatment and absence of prior angiosuppressive therapy were both associated with a lower rate of serious adverse events. On the basis of PET/CA15-3 criteria, 52/61% of patients responded to treatment. Median overall survival after radioembolization was 35 wk (interquartile range, 41 wk). Pretherapeutic tumor burden of the liver greater than 50% or more (P&lt; 0.001; hazard ratio, 5.67; 95% confidence interval, 2.41-13.34) and a transaminase toxicity grade of 2 or more (P= 0.009; hazard ratio, 2.15; 95% confidence interval, 1.21-3.80) independently predicted short survival. Radioembolization for breast cancer liver metastases shows encouraging local response rates with low incidence of serious adverse events, especially in those patients with sequential lobar treatment or without prior angiosuppressive therapy. High hepatic tumor burden and liver transaminase levels at baseline indicate poor outcome.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0161-5505</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1535-5667</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2159-662X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.115.165050</identifier><identifier>PMID: 26742710</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JNMEAQ</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Society of Nuclear Medicine</publisher><subject>Angiogenesis Inhibitors - therapeutic use ; Breast cancer ; Breast Neoplasms - pathology ; Embolization, Therapeutic - adverse effects ; Embolization, Therapeutic - methods ; Endpoint Determination ; Female ; Fluorodeoxyglucose F18 - metabolism ; Health physics ; Humans ; Liver diseases ; Liver Function Tests ; Liver Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging ; Liver Neoplasms - radiotherapy ; Liver Neoplasms - secondary ; Middle Aged ; Nuclear medicine ; Positron-Emission Tomography ; Prognosis ; Radiation therapy ; Radiopharmaceuticals - metabolism ; Treatment Outcome ; Tumor Burden ; Tumors ; Yttrium Radioisotopes - therapeutic use</subject><ispartof>Journal of Nuclear Medicine, 2016-04, Vol.57 (4), p.517-523</ispartof><rights>2016 by the Society of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright Society of Nuclear Medicine Apr 1, 2016</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c405t-6a00e341682e0fbb9eec93e4518298d44c02cd04a6f8965369a076bf5f22a3603</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c405t-6a00e341682e0fbb9eec93e4518298d44c02cd04a6f8965369a076bf5f22a3603</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26742710$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Fendler, Wolfgang P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lechner, Hanna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Todica, Andrei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Paprottka, Karolin J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Paprottka, Philipp M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jakobs, Tobias F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Michl, Marlies</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bartenstein, Peter</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lehner, Sebastian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Haug, Alexander R</creatorcontrib><title>Safety, Efficacy, and Prognostic Factors After Radioembolization of Hepatic Metastases from Breast Cancer: A Large Single-Center Experience in 81 Patients</title><title>Journal of Nuclear Medicine</title><addtitle>J Nucl Med</addtitle><description>The present study evaluated safety, efficacy, and prognostic factors for (90)Y-yttrium microsphere radioembolization of unresectable liver metastases from breast cancer. Eighty-one patients were treated with radioembolization. Acute toxicity was monitored through daily physical examination and serum tests until 3 d after radioembolization; late toxicity was evaluated until 12 wk after radioembolization. Overall survival and response according to (18)F-FDG PET (&gt;30% decrease of tracer uptake) and CA15-3 serum level (any decline) were recorded. Pretherapeutic characteristics, including pretreatment history, liver function tests, and PET/CT parameters, were assessed by univariate and subsequent multivariate Cox regression for predicting patient survival. A toxicity grade of 3 or more based on clinical symptoms, bilirubin, ulcer, pancreatitis, ascites, or radioembolization-induced liver disease occurred in 10% or less of patients. Two patients eventually died from radioembolization-induced liver disease. Sequential lobar treatment and absence of prior angiosuppressive therapy were both associated with a lower rate of serious adverse events. On the basis of PET/CA15-3 criteria, 52/61% of patients responded to treatment. Median overall survival after radioembolization was 35 wk (interquartile range, 41 wk). Pretherapeutic tumor burden of the liver greater than 50% or more (P&lt; 0.001; hazard ratio, 5.67; 95% confidence interval, 2.41-13.34) and a transaminase toxicity grade of 2 or more (P= 0.009; hazard ratio, 2.15; 95% confidence interval, 1.21-3.80) independently predicted short survival. Radioembolization for breast cancer liver metastases shows encouraging local response rates with low incidence of serious adverse events, especially in those patients with sequential lobar treatment or without prior angiosuppressive therapy. High hepatic tumor burden and liver transaminase levels at baseline indicate poor outcome.</description><subject>Angiogenesis Inhibitors - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Breast cancer</subject><subject>Breast Neoplasms - pathology</subject><subject>Embolization, Therapeutic - adverse effects</subject><subject>Embolization, Therapeutic - methods</subject><subject>Endpoint Determination</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Fluorodeoxyglucose F18 - metabolism</subject><subject>Health physics</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Liver diseases</subject><subject>Liver Function Tests</subject><subject>Liver Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Liver Neoplasms - radiotherapy</subject><subject>Liver Neoplasms - secondary</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Nuclear medicine</subject><subject>Positron-Emission Tomography</subject><subject>Prognosis</subject><subject>Radiation therapy</subject><subject>Radiopharmaceuticals - metabolism</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><subject>Tumor Burden</subject><subject>Tumors</subject><subject>Yttrium Radioisotopes - therapeutic use</subject><issn>0161-5505</issn><issn>1535-5667</issn><issn>2159-662X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpdkdGK1DAUhoMo7uzqA3gjAW-82I4naZOm3o3DrCuMuLh6XdL0ZMjQJmPSguuj-LSmzO6NJJCE_zs_gY-QNwzWvJH1h6OfR-zXjIk1kwIEPCMrJkpRCCnr52QFTLJC5OCCXKZ0BACplHpJLrisK14zWJG_99ri9HBNd9Y6o02-ad_TuxgOPqTJGXqjzRRiohs7YaTfde8Cjl0Y3B89ueBpsPQWT3pBv-KkU96YqI1hpJ8i5jfdam8wfqQbutfxgPTe-cOAxRb90rj7fcLoMCPUeaoYvctdOUqvyAurh4SvH88r8vNm92N7W-y_ff6y3ewLU4GYCqkBsKyYVBzBdl2DaJoSK8EUb1RfVQa46aHS0qpGilI2GmrZWWE516WE8oq8P_eeYvg1Y5ra0SWDw6A9hjm1rFZ1UzcNiIy--w89hjn6_LuF4nmVSmWKnSkTQ0oRbXuKbtTxoWXQLuLas7g2i2vP4vLM28fmuVuip4knU-U_5j6VGw</recordid><startdate>201604</startdate><enddate>201604</enddate><creator>Fendler, Wolfgang P</creator><creator>Lechner, Hanna</creator><creator>Todica, Andrei</creator><creator>Paprottka, Karolin J</creator><creator>Paprottka, Philipp M</creator><creator>Jakobs, Tobias F</creator><creator>Michl, Marlies</creator><creator>Bartenstein, Peter</creator><creator>Lehner, Sebastian</creator><creator>Haug, Alexander R</creator><general>Society of Nuclear Medicine</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>4T-</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M7Z</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>7QO</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201604</creationdate><title>Safety, Efficacy, and Prognostic Factors After Radioembolization of Hepatic Metastases from Breast Cancer: A Large Single-Center Experience in 81 Patients</title><author>Fendler, Wolfgang P ; Lechner, Hanna ; Todica, Andrei ; Paprottka, Karolin J ; Paprottka, Philipp M ; Jakobs, Tobias F ; Michl, Marlies ; Bartenstein, Peter ; Lehner, Sebastian ; Haug, Alexander R</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c405t-6a00e341682e0fbb9eec93e4518298d44c02cd04a6f8965369a076bf5f22a3603</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Angiogenesis Inhibitors - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Breast cancer</topic><topic>Breast Neoplasms - pathology</topic><topic>Embolization, Therapeutic - adverse effects</topic><topic>Embolization, Therapeutic - methods</topic><topic>Endpoint Determination</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Fluorodeoxyglucose F18 - metabolism</topic><topic>Health physics</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Liver diseases</topic><topic>Liver Function Tests</topic><topic>Liver Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Liver Neoplasms - radiotherapy</topic><topic>Liver Neoplasms - secondary</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Nuclear medicine</topic><topic>Positron-Emission Tomography</topic><topic>Prognosis</topic><topic>Radiation therapy</topic><topic>Radiopharmaceuticals - metabolism</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><topic>Tumor Burden</topic><topic>Tumors</topic><topic>Yttrium Radioisotopes - therapeutic use</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Fendler, Wolfgang P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lechner, Hanna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Todica, Andrei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Paprottka, Karolin J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Paprottka, Philipp M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jakobs, Tobias F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Michl, Marlies</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bartenstein, Peter</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lehner, Sebastian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Haug, Alexander R</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Docstoc</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Biochemistry Abstracts 1</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Journal of Nuclear Medicine</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Fendler, Wolfgang P</au><au>Lechner, Hanna</au><au>Todica, Andrei</au><au>Paprottka, Karolin J</au><au>Paprottka, Philipp M</au><au>Jakobs, Tobias F</au><au>Michl, Marlies</au><au>Bartenstein, Peter</au><au>Lehner, Sebastian</au><au>Haug, Alexander R</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Safety, Efficacy, and Prognostic Factors After Radioembolization of Hepatic Metastases from Breast Cancer: A Large Single-Center Experience in 81 Patients</atitle><jtitle>Journal of Nuclear Medicine</jtitle><addtitle>J Nucl Med</addtitle><date>2016-04</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>57</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>517</spage><epage>523</epage><pages>517-523</pages><issn>0161-5505</issn><eissn>1535-5667</eissn><eissn>2159-662X</eissn><coden>JNMEAQ</coden><abstract>The present study evaluated safety, efficacy, and prognostic factors for (90)Y-yttrium microsphere radioembolization of unresectable liver metastases from breast cancer. Eighty-one patients were treated with radioembolization. Acute toxicity was monitored through daily physical examination and serum tests until 3 d after radioembolization; late toxicity was evaluated until 12 wk after radioembolization. Overall survival and response according to (18)F-FDG PET (&gt;30% decrease of tracer uptake) and CA15-3 serum level (any decline) were recorded. Pretherapeutic characteristics, including pretreatment history, liver function tests, and PET/CT parameters, were assessed by univariate and subsequent multivariate Cox regression for predicting patient survival. A toxicity grade of 3 or more based on clinical symptoms, bilirubin, ulcer, pancreatitis, ascites, or radioembolization-induced liver disease occurred in 10% or less of patients. Two patients eventually died from radioembolization-induced liver disease. Sequential lobar treatment and absence of prior angiosuppressive therapy were both associated with a lower rate of serious adverse events. On the basis of PET/CA15-3 criteria, 52/61% of patients responded to treatment. Median overall survival after radioembolization was 35 wk (interquartile range, 41 wk). Pretherapeutic tumor burden of the liver greater than 50% or more (P&lt; 0.001; hazard ratio, 5.67; 95% confidence interval, 2.41-13.34) and a transaminase toxicity grade of 2 or more (P= 0.009; hazard ratio, 2.15; 95% confidence interval, 1.21-3.80) independently predicted short survival. Radioembolization for breast cancer liver metastases shows encouraging local response rates with low incidence of serious adverse events, especially in those patients with sequential lobar treatment or without prior angiosuppressive therapy. High hepatic tumor burden and liver transaminase levels at baseline indicate poor outcome.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Society of Nuclear Medicine</pub><pmid>26742710</pmid><doi>10.2967/jnumed.115.165050</doi><tpages>7</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0161-5505
ispartof Journal of Nuclear Medicine, 2016-04, Vol.57 (4), p.517-523
issn 0161-5505
1535-5667
2159-662X
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1787979905
source MEDLINE; Alma/SFX Local Collection; EZB Electronic Journals Library
subjects Angiogenesis Inhibitors - therapeutic use
Breast cancer
Breast Neoplasms - pathology
Embolization, Therapeutic - adverse effects
Embolization, Therapeutic - methods
Endpoint Determination
Female
Fluorodeoxyglucose F18 - metabolism
Health physics
Humans
Liver diseases
Liver Function Tests
Liver Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging
Liver Neoplasms - radiotherapy
Liver Neoplasms - secondary
Middle Aged
Nuclear medicine
Positron-Emission Tomography
Prognosis
Radiation therapy
Radiopharmaceuticals - metabolism
Treatment Outcome
Tumor Burden
Tumors
Yttrium Radioisotopes - therapeutic use
title Safety, Efficacy, and Prognostic Factors After Radioembolization of Hepatic Metastases from Breast Cancer: A Large Single-Center Experience in 81 Patients
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-25T11%3A04%3A50IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Safety,%20Efficacy,%20and%20Prognostic%20Factors%20After%20Radioembolization%20of%20Hepatic%20Metastases%20from%20Breast%20Cancer:%20A%20Large%20Single-Center%20Experience%20in%2081%20Patients&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20Nuclear%20Medicine&rft.au=Fendler,%20Wolfgang%20P&rft.date=2016-04&rft.volume=57&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=517&rft.epage=523&rft.pages=517-523&rft.issn=0161-5505&rft.eissn=1535-5667&rft.coden=JNMEAQ&rft_id=info:doi/10.2967/jnumed.115.165050&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E4029435101%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1782828388&rft_id=info:pmid/26742710&rfr_iscdi=true