Evaluation of the genetic diversity of microsatellite markers among four strains of Oreochromis niloticus
Summary Different strains of Nile tilapia can be found worldwide. To successfully use them in breeding programs, they must be genetically characterized. In this study, four strains of Nile tilapia – UFLA, GIFT, Chitralada and Red‐Stirling – were genetically characterized using 10 noncoding microsate...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Animal genetics 2016-06, Vol.47 (3), p.345-353 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 353 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 345 |
container_title | Animal genetics |
container_volume | 47 |
creator | Dias, M. A. D. de Freitas, R. T. F. Arranz, S. E. Villanova, G. V. Hilsdorf, A. W. S. |
description | Summary
Different strains of Nile tilapia can be found worldwide. To successfully use them in breeding programs, they must be genetically characterized. In this study, four strains of Nile tilapia – UFLA, GIFT, Chitralada and Red‐Stirling – were genetically characterized using 10 noncoding microsatellite loci and two microsatellites located in the promoter and first intron of the growth hormone gene (GH). The two microsatellites in the GH gene were identified at positions −693 to −679 in the promoter [motif (ATTCT)8] and in intron 1 at positions +140 to +168 [motif (CTGT)7]. Genetic diversity was measured as mean numbers of alleles and expected heterozygosity, which were 4 and 0.60 (GIFT), 3.5 and 0.71 (UFLA), 4.5 and 0.57 (Chitralada) and 2.5 and 0.42 (Red‐Stirling) respectively. Genetic differentiation was estimated both separately and in combination for noncoding and GH microsatellites markers using Jost's DEST index. The UFLA and GIFT strains were the least genetically divergent (DEST = 0.10), and Chitralada and Red‐Stirling were the most (DEST = 0.58). The UFLA strain was genetically characterized for the first time and, because of its unique origin and genetic distinctness, may prove to be an important resource for genetic improvement of Nile tilapia. This study shows that polymorphisms found in coding gene regions might be useful for assessing genetic differentiation among strains. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/age.12423 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1787979504</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1787979504</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4593-25b28aadbdf1f3e15332706a3a34902e13fcbc37ea4f1818a1bb592ae23f9a463</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkcFu1DAQhi0EokvhwAsgS1zgkNb2OHF8bMvuAqpahEAcLSc72bokcbGdwr49Dtv2gISELz7MN79m5iPkJWdHPL9ju8UjLqSAR2TBoSoLwUrxmCyYqOpCc1kdkGcxXjPGaq74U3IgKg2C1_WCuOWt7SebnB-p72i6QrrFEZNr6cbdYogu7ebC4Nrgo03Y9y4hHWz4novUDn7c0s5PgcYUrBvjDF8G9O1V8IOLdHS9z2lTfE6edLaP-OLuPyRfV8svZ--L88v1h7OT86KVpYZClI2ord00m453gLwEEIpVFixIzQRy6NqmBYVWdrzmteVNU2phUUCnrazgkLzZ594E_2PCmEweo81z2xH9FA1XtdJKl0z-DyqV1Bwgo6__Qq_z0mNeZKZAC62EztTbPTUfKwbszE1w-VY7w5mZVZmsyvxRldlXd4lTM-Dmgbx3k4HjPfDT9bj7d5I5WS_vI4t9h4sJfz10ZFemUqBK8-1ibU4_XZx-Xr37aFbwG_54rOk</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1783929729</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Evaluation of the genetic diversity of microsatellite markers among four strains of Oreochromis niloticus</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library All Journals</source><creator>Dias, M. A. D. ; de Freitas, R. T. F. ; Arranz, S. E. ; Villanova, G. V. ; Hilsdorf, A. W. S.</creator><creatorcontrib>Dias, M. A. D. ; de Freitas, R. T. F. ; Arranz, S. E. ; Villanova, G. V. ; Hilsdorf, A. W. S.</creatorcontrib><description>Summary
Different strains of Nile tilapia can be found worldwide. To successfully use them in breeding programs, they must be genetically characterized. In this study, four strains of Nile tilapia – UFLA, GIFT, Chitralada and Red‐Stirling – were genetically characterized using 10 noncoding microsatellite loci and two microsatellites located in the promoter and first intron of the growth hormone gene (GH). The two microsatellites in the GH gene were identified at positions −693 to −679 in the promoter [motif (ATTCT)8] and in intron 1 at positions +140 to +168 [motif (CTGT)7]. Genetic diversity was measured as mean numbers of alleles and expected heterozygosity, which were 4 and 0.60 (GIFT), 3.5 and 0.71 (UFLA), 4.5 and 0.57 (Chitralada) and 2.5 and 0.42 (Red‐Stirling) respectively. Genetic differentiation was estimated both separately and in combination for noncoding and GH microsatellites markers using Jost's DEST index. The UFLA and GIFT strains were the least genetically divergent (DEST = 0.10), and Chitralada and Red‐Stirling were the most (DEST = 0.58). The UFLA strain was genetically characterized for the first time and, because of its unique origin and genetic distinctness, may prove to be an important resource for genetic improvement of Nile tilapia. This study shows that polymorphisms found in coding gene regions might be useful for assessing genetic differentiation among strains.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0268-9146</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1365-2052</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/age.12423</identifier><identifier>PMID: 26932188</identifier><identifier>CODEN: ANGEE3</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Alleles ; Animals ; Breeding ; Cichlids - genetics ; Fish Proteins - genetics ; genetic variability ; Genetic Variation ; growth hormone ; Growth Hormone - genetics ; Introns ; Microsatellite Repeats ; Nile tilapia ; Oreochromis niloticus ; population genetics ; Promoter Regions, Genetic ; STR ; tilapia strains</subject><ispartof>Animal genetics, 2016-06, Vol.47 (3), p.345-353</ispartof><rights>2016 Stichting International Foundation for Animal Genetics</rights><rights>2016 Stichting International Foundation for Animal Genetics.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2016 Stichting International Foundation for Animal Genetics</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4593-25b28aadbdf1f3e15332706a3a34902e13fcbc37ea4f1818a1bb592ae23f9a463</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4593-25b28aadbdf1f3e15332706a3a34902e13fcbc37ea4f1818a1bb592ae23f9a463</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fage.12423$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fage.12423$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,27923,27924,45573,45574</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26932188$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Dias, M. A. D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Freitas, R. T. F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Arranz, S. E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Villanova, G. V.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hilsdorf, A. W. S.</creatorcontrib><title>Evaluation of the genetic diversity of microsatellite markers among four strains of Oreochromis niloticus</title><title>Animal genetics</title><addtitle>Anim Genet</addtitle><description>Summary
Different strains of Nile tilapia can be found worldwide. To successfully use them in breeding programs, they must be genetically characterized. In this study, four strains of Nile tilapia – UFLA, GIFT, Chitralada and Red‐Stirling – were genetically characterized using 10 noncoding microsatellite loci and two microsatellites located in the promoter and first intron of the growth hormone gene (GH). The two microsatellites in the GH gene were identified at positions −693 to −679 in the promoter [motif (ATTCT)8] and in intron 1 at positions +140 to +168 [motif (CTGT)7]. Genetic diversity was measured as mean numbers of alleles and expected heterozygosity, which were 4 and 0.60 (GIFT), 3.5 and 0.71 (UFLA), 4.5 and 0.57 (Chitralada) and 2.5 and 0.42 (Red‐Stirling) respectively. Genetic differentiation was estimated both separately and in combination for noncoding and GH microsatellites markers using Jost's DEST index. The UFLA and GIFT strains were the least genetically divergent (DEST = 0.10), and Chitralada and Red‐Stirling were the most (DEST = 0.58). The UFLA strain was genetically characterized for the first time and, because of its unique origin and genetic distinctness, may prove to be an important resource for genetic improvement of Nile tilapia. This study shows that polymorphisms found in coding gene regions might be useful for assessing genetic differentiation among strains.</description><subject>Alleles</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Breeding</subject><subject>Cichlids - genetics</subject><subject>Fish Proteins - genetics</subject><subject>genetic variability</subject><subject>Genetic Variation</subject><subject>growth hormone</subject><subject>Growth Hormone - genetics</subject><subject>Introns</subject><subject>Microsatellite Repeats</subject><subject>Nile tilapia</subject><subject>Oreochromis niloticus</subject><subject>population genetics</subject><subject>Promoter Regions, Genetic</subject><subject>STR</subject><subject>tilapia strains</subject><issn>0268-9146</issn><issn>1365-2052</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkcFu1DAQhi0EokvhwAsgS1zgkNb2OHF8bMvuAqpahEAcLSc72bokcbGdwr49Dtv2gISELz7MN79m5iPkJWdHPL9ju8UjLqSAR2TBoSoLwUrxmCyYqOpCc1kdkGcxXjPGaq74U3IgKg2C1_WCuOWt7SebnB-p72i6QrrFEZNr6cbdYogu7ebC4Nrgo03Y9y4hHWz4novUDn7c0s5PgcYUrBvjDF8G9O1V8IOLdHS9z2lTfE6edLaP-OLuPyRfV8svZ--L88v1h7OT86KVpYZClI2ord00m453gLwEEIpVFixIzQRy6NqmBYVWdrzmteVNU2phUUCnrazgkLzZ594E_2PCmEweo81z2xH9FA1XtdJKl0z-DyqV1Bwgo6__Qq_z0mNeZKZAC62EztTbPTUfKwbszE1w-VY7w5mZVZmsyvxRldlXd4lTM-Dmgbx3k4HjPfDT9bj7d5I5WS_vI4t9h4sJfz10ZFemUqBK8-1ibU4_XZx-Xr37aFbwG_54rOk</recordid><startdate>201606</startdate><enddate>201606</enddate><creator>Dias, M. A. D.</creator><creator>de Freitas, R. T. F.</creator><creator>Arranz, S. E.</creator><creator>Villanova, G. V.</creator><creator>Hilsdorf, A. W. S.</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201606</creationdate><title>Evaluation of the genetic diversity of microsatellite markers among four strains of Oreochromis niloticus</title><author>Dias, M. A. D. ; de Freitas, R. T. F. ; Arranz, S. E. ; Villanova, G. V. ; Hilsdorf, A. W. S.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4593-25b28aadbdf1f3e15332706a3a34902e13fcbc37ea4f1818a1bb592ae23f9a463</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Alleles</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Breeding</topic><topic>Cichlids - genetics</topic><topic>Fish Proteins - genetics</topic><topic>genetic variability</topic><topic>Genetic Variation</topic><topic>growth hormone</topic><topic>Growth Hormone - genetics</topic><topic>Introns</topic><topic>Microsatellite Repeats</topic><topic>Nile tilapia</topic><topic>Oreochromis niloticus</topic><topic>population genetics</topic><topic>Promoter Regions, Genetic</topic><topic>STR</topic><topic>tilapia strains</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Dias, M. A. D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Freitas, R. T. F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Arranz, S. E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Villanova, G. V.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hilsdorf, A. W. S.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Animal genetics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Dias, M. A. D.</au><au>de Freitas, R. T. F.</au><au>Arranz, S. E.</au><au>Villanova, G. V.</au><au>Hilsdorf, A. W. S.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Evaluation of the genetic diversity of microsatellite markers among four strains of Oreochromis niloticus</atitle><jtitle>Animal genetics</jtitle><addtitle>Anim Genet</addtitle><date>2016-06</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>47</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>345</spage><epage>353</epage><pages>345-353</pages><issn>0268-9146</issn><eissn>1365-2052</eissn><coden>ANGEE3</coden><abstract>Summary
Different strains of Nile tilapia can be found worldwide. To successfully use them in breeding programs, they must be genetically characterized. In this study, four strains of Nile tilapia – UFLA, GIFT, Chitralada and Red‐Stirling – were genetically characterized using 10 noncoding microsatellite loci and two microsatellites located in the promoter and first intron of the growth hormone gene (GH). The two microsatellites in the GH gene were identified at positions −693 to −679 in the promoter [motif (ATTCT)8] and in intron 1 at positions +140 to +168 [motif (CTGT)7]. Genetic diversity was measured as mean numbers of alleles and expected heterozygosity, which were 4 and 0.60 (GIFT), 3.5 and 0.71 (UFLA), 4.5 and 0.57 (Chitralada) and 2.5 and 0.42 (Red‐Stirling) respectively. Genetic differentiation was estimated both separately and in combination for noncoding and GH microsatellites markers using Jost's DEST index. The UFLA and GIFT strains were the least genetically divergent (DEST = 0.10), and Chitralada and Red‐Stirling were the most (DEST = 0.58). The UFLA strain was genetically characterized for the first time and, because of its unique origin and genetic distinctness, may prove to be an important resource for genetic improvement of Nile tilapia. This study shows that polymorphisms found in coding gene regions might be useful for assessing genetic differentiation among strains.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><pmid>26932188</pmid><doi>10.1111/age.12423</doi><tpages>9</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0268-9146 |
ispartof | Animal genetics, 2016-06, Vol.47 (3), p.345-353 |
issn | 0268-9146 1365-2052 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1787979504 |
source | MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library All Journals |
subjects | Alleles Animals Breeding Cichlids - genetics Fish Proteins - genetics genetic variability Genetic Variation growth hormone Growth Hormone - genetics Introns Microsatellite Repeats Nile tilapia Oreochromis niloticus population genetics Promoter Regions, Genetic STR tilapia strains |
title | Evaluation of the genetic diversity of microsatellite markers among four strains of Oreochromis niloticus |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-08T08%3A09%3A02IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Evaluation%20of%20the%20genetic%20diversity%20of%20microsatellite%20markers%20among%20four%20strains%20of%20Oreochromis%20niloticus&rft.jtitle=Animal%20genetics&rft.au=Dias,%20M.%20A.%20D.&rft.date=2016-06&rft.volume=47&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=345&rft.epage=353&rft.pages=345-353&rft.issn=0268-9146&rft.eissn=1365-2052&rft.coden=ANGEE3&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/age.12423&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1787979504%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1783929729&rft_id=info:pmid/26932188&rfr_iscdi=true |