The effect of spatial resolution on decoding accuracy in fMRI multivariate pattern analysis

Multivariate pattern analysis (MVPA) in fMRI has been used to extract information from distributed cortical activation patterns, which may go undetected in conventional univariate analysis. However, little is known about the physical and physiological underpinnings of MVPA in fMRI as well as about t...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:NeuroImage (Orlando, Fla.) Fla.), 2016-05, Vol.132, p.32-42
Hauptverfasser: Gardumi, Anna, Ivanov, Dimo, Hausfeld, Lars, Valente, Giancarlo, Formisano, Elia, Uludağ, Kâmil
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 42
container_issue
container_start_page 32
container_title NeuroImage (Orlando, Fla.)
container_volume 132
creator Gardumi, Anna
Ivanov, Dimo
Hausfeld, Lars
Valente, Giancarlo
Formisano, Elia
Uludağ, Kâmil
description Multivariate pattern analysis (MVPA) in fMRI has been used to extract information from distributed cortical activation patterns, which may go undetected in conventional univariate analysis. However, little is known about the physical and physiological underpinnings of MVPA in fMRI as well as about the effect of spatial smoothing on its performance. Several studies have addressed these issues, but their investigation was limited to the visual cortex at 3T with conflicting results. Here, we used ultra-high field (7T) fMRI to investigate the effect of spatial resolution and smoothing on decoding of speech content (vowels) and speaker identity from auditory cortical responses. To that end, we acquired high-resolution (1.1mm isotropic) fMRI data and additionally reconstructed them at 2.2 and 3.3mm in-plane spatial resolutions from the original k-space data. Furthermore, the data at each resolution were spatially smoothed with different 3D Gaussian kernel sizes (i.e. no smoothing or 1.1, 2.2, 3.3, 4.4, or 8.8mm kernels). For all spatial resolutions and smoothing kernels, we demonstrate the feasibility of decoding speech content (vowel) and speaker identity at 7T using support vector machine (SVM) MVPA. In addition, we found that high spatial frequencies are informative for vowel decoding and that the relative contribution of high and low spatial frequencies is different across the two decoding tasks. Moderate smoothing (up to 2.2mm) improved the accuracies for both decoding of vowels and speakers, possibly due to reduction of noise (e.g. residual motion artifacts or instrument noise) while still preserving information at high spatial frequency. In summary, our results show that – even with the same stimuli and within the same brain areas – the optimal spatial resolution for MVPA in fMRI depends on the specific decoding task of interest.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2016.02.033
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1787977513</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S1053811916001427</els_id><sourcerecordid>1786126231</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c606t-8115f15a34dcc921b902830a83a2e537f2e471cf3aabfdca6e84d9d90555da6e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkU1rVDEUhoMotrb-hRJw42au-ZjcJEtbqhYqgtRVF-FMctJmuHMzJvcOzL83w1QFNxUC-eB5z0nyEEI56zjj_Yd1N-JcctrAA3ainXRMdEzKF-SUM6sWVmnx8rBWcmE4tyfkTa1rxpjlS_OanIjeWKuNOCX3d49IMUb0E82R1i1MCQZasOZhnlIeaRsBfQ5pfKDg_VzA72kaafz6_YZu5mFKOygJJqQtO2EZKYww7Guq5-RVhKHi26f5jPz4dH139WVx--3zzdXH24XvWT8dLqgiVyCXwXsr-MoyYSQDI0GgkjoKXGruowRYxeChR7MMNlimlAptJ8_I-2Pdbck_Z6yT26TqcRhgxDxXx7XRVmvF5f-gPRe9kLyh7_5B13ku7WlHSkslrGiUOVK-5FoLRrctTUvZO87cwZVbu7-u3MGVY8I1Vy168dRgXm0w_An-ltOAyyOA7fN2CYurPuHoMaTSfLmQ0_NdfgELe6py</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1786735292</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The effect of spatial resolution on decoding accuracy in fMRI multivariate pattern analysis</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Gardumi, Anna ; Ivanov, Dimo ; Hausfeld, Lars ; Valente, Giancarlo ; Formisano, Elia ; Uludağ, Kâmil</creator><creatorcontrib>Gardumi, Anna ; Ivanov, Dimo ; Hausfeld, Lars ; Valente, Giancarlo ; Formisano, Elia ; Uludağ, Kâmil</creatorcontrib><description>Multivariate pattern analysis (MVPA) in fMRI has been used to extract information from distributed cortical activation patterns, which may go undetected in conventional univariate analysis. However, little is known about the physical and physiological underpinnings of MVPA in fMRI as well as about the effect of spatial smoothing on its performance. Several studies have addressed these issues, but their investigation was limited to the visual cortex at 3T with conflicting results. Here, we used ultra-high field (7T) fMRI to investigate the effect of spatial resolution and smoothing on decoding of speech content (vowels) and speaker identity from auditory cortical responses. To that end, we acquired high-resolution (1.1mm isotropic) fMRI data and additionally reconstructed them at 2.2 and 3.3mm in-plane spatial resolutions from the original k-space data. Furthermore, the data at each resolution were spatially smoothed with different 3D Gaussian kernel sizes (i.e. no smoothing or 1.1, 2.2, 3.3, 4.4, or 8.8mm kernels). For all spatial resolutions and smoothing kernels, we demonstrate the feasibility of decoding speech content (vowel) and speaker identity at 7T using support vector machine (SVM) MVPA. In addition, we found that high spatial frequencies are informative for vowel decoding and that the relative contribution of high and low spatial frequencies is different across the two decoding tasks. Moderate smoothing (up to 2.2mm) improved the accuracies for both decoding of vowels and speakers, possibly due to reduction of noise (e.g. residual motion artifacts or instrument noise) while still preserving information at high spatial frequency. In summary, our results show that – even with the same stimuli and within the same brain areas – the optimal spatial resolution for MVPA in fMRI depends on the specific decoding task of interest.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1053-8119</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1095-9572</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2016.02.033</identifier><identifier>PMID: 26899782</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>7 T ; Acoustic Stimulation ; Acquisitions &amp; mergers ; Adult ; Auditory cortex ; Brain - physiology ; Brain Mapping - methods ; Brain research ; Experiments ; Female ; fMRI ; Humans ; Hypotheses ; Image Processing, Computer-Assisted ; Magnetic Resonance Imaging ; Male ; Multivariate Analysis ; Multivariate pattern analysis ; NMR ; Noise ; Nuclear magnetic resonance ; Pattern Recognition, Automated ; Signal Processing, Computer-Assisted ; Spatial resolution ; Spatial smoothing ; Speech Perception ; Studies ; Support Vector Machine ; Veins &amp; arteries</subject><ispartof>NeuroImage (Orlando, Fla.), 2016-05, Vol.132, p.32-42</ispartof><rights>2016 Elsevier Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier Limited May 15, 2016</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c606t-8115f15a34dcc921b902830a83a2e537f2e471cf3aabfdca6e84d9d90555da6e3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c606t-8115f15a34dcc921b902830a83a2e537f2e471cf3aabfdca6e84d9d90555da6e3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1053811916001427$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26899782$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Gardumi, Anna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ivanov, Dimo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hausfeld, Lars</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Valente, Giancarlo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Formisano, Elia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Uludağ, Kâmil</creatorcontrib><title>The effect of spatial resolution on decoding accuracy in fMRI multivariate pattern analysis</title><title>NeuroImage (Orlando, Fla.)</title><addtitle>Neuroimage</addtitle><description>Multivariate pattern analysis (MVPA) in fMRI has been used to extract information from distributed cortical activation patterns, which may go undetected in conventional univariate analysis. However, little is known about the physical and physiological underpinnings of MVPA in fMRI as well as about the effect of spatial smoothing on its performance. Several studies have addressed these issues, but their investigation was limited to the visual cortex at 3T with conflicting results. Here, we used ultra-high field (7T) fMRI to investigate the effect of spatial resolution and smoothing on decoding of speech content (vowels) and speaker identity from auditory cortical responses. To that end, we acquired high-resolution (1.1mm isotropic) fMRI data and additionally reconstructed them at 2.2 and 3.3mm in-plane spatial resolutions from the original k-space data. Furthermore, the data at each resolution were spatially smoothed with different 3D Gaussian kernel sizes (i.e. no smoothing or 1.1, 2.2, 3.3, 4.4, or 8.8mm kernels). For all spatial resolutions and smoothing kernels, we demonstrate the feasibility of decoding speech content (vowel) and speaker identity at 7T using support vector machine (SVM) MVPA. In addition, we found that high spatial frequencies are informative for vowel decoding and that the relative contribution of high and low spatial frequencies is different across the two decoding tasks. Moderate smoothing (up to 2.2mm) improved the accuracies for both decoding of vowels and speakers, possibly due to reduction of noise (e.g. residual motion artifacts or instrument noise) while still preserving information at high spatial frequency. In summary, our results show that – even with the same stimuli and within the same brain areas – the optimal spatial resolution for MVPA in fMRI depends on the specific decoding task of interest.</description><subject>7 T</subject><subject>Acoustic Stimulation</subject><subject>Acquisitions &amp; mergers</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Auditory cortex</subject><subject>Brain - physiology</subject><subject>Brain Mapping - methods</subject><subject>Brain research</subject><subject>Experiments</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>fMRI</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Hypotheses</subject><subject>Image Processing, Computer-Assisted</subject><subject>Magnetic Resonance Imaging</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Multivariate Analysis</subject><subject>Multivariate pattern analysis</subject><subject>NMR</subject><subject>Noise</subject><subject>Nuclear magnetic resonance</subject><subject>Pattern Recognition, Automated</subject><subject>Signal Processing, Computer-Assisted</subject><subject>Spatial resolution</subject><subject>Spatial smoothing</subject><subject>Speech Perception</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Support Vector Machine</subject><subject>Veins &amp; arteries</subject><issn>1053-8119</issn><issn>1095-9572</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkU1rVDEUhoMotrb-hRJw42au-ZjcJEtbqhYqgtRVF-FMctJmuHMzJvcOzL83w1QFNxUC-eB5z0nyEEI56zjj_Yd1N-JcctrAA3ainXRMdEzKF-SUM6sWVmnx8rBWcmE4tyfkTa1rxpjlS_OanIjeWKuNOCX3d49IMUb0E82R1i1MCQZasOZhnlIeaRsBfQ5pfKDg_VzA72kaafz6_YZu5mFKOygJJqQtO2EZKYww7Guq5-RVhKHi26f5jPz4dH139WVx--3zzdXH24XvWT8dLqgiVyCXwXsr-MoyYSQDI0GgkjoKXGruowRYxeChR7MMNlimlAptJ8_I-2Pdbck_Z6yT26TqcRhgxDxXx7XRVmvF5f-gPRe9kLyh7_5B13ku7WlHSkslrGiUOVK-5FoLRrctTUvZO87cwZVbu7-u3MGVY8I1Vy168dRgXm0w_An-ltOAyyOA7fN2CYurPuHoMaTSfLmQ0_NdfgELe6py</recordid><startdate>20160515</startdate><enddate>20160515</enddate><creator>Gardumi, Anna</creator><creator>Ivanov, Dimo</creator><creator>Hausfeld, Lars</creator><creator>Valente, Giancarlo</creator><creator>Formisano, Elia</creator><creator>Uludağ, Kâmil</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>Elsevier Limited</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>7QO</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20160515</creationdate><title>The effect of spatial resolution on decoding accuracy in fMRI multivariate pattern analysis</title><author>Gardumi, Anna ; Ivanov, Dimo ; Hausfeld, Lars ; Valente, Giancarlo ; Formisano, Elia ; Uludağ, Kâmil</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c606t-8115f15a34dcc921b902830a83a2e537f2e471cf3aabfdca6e84d9d90555da6e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>7 T</topic><topic>Acoustic Stimulation</topic><topic>Acquisitions &amp; mergers</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Auditory cortex</topic><topic>Brain - physiology</topic><topic>Brain Mapping - methods</topic><topic>Brain research</topic><topic>Experiments</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>fMRI</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Hypotheses</topic><topic>Image Processing, Computer-Assisted</topic><topic>Magnetic Resonance Imaging</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Multivariate Analysis</topic><topic>Multivariate pattern analysis</topic><topic>NMR</topic><topic>Noise</topic><topic>Nuclear magnetic resonance</topic><topic>Pattern Recognition, Automated</topic><topic>Signal Processing, Computer-Assisted</topic><topic>Spatial resolution</topic><topic>Spatial smoothing</topic><topic>Speech Perception</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Support Vector Machine</topic><topic>Veins &amp; arteries</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Gardumi, Anna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ivanov, Dimo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hausfeld, Lars</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Valente, Giancarlo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Formisano, Elia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Uludağ, Kâmil</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Psychology</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><jtitle>NeuroImage (Orlando, Fla.)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Gardumi, Anna</au><au>Ivanov, Dimo</au><au>Hausfeld, Lars</au><au>Valente, Giancarlo</au><au>Formisano, Elia</au><au>Uludağ, Kâmil</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The effect of spatial resolution on decoding accuracy in fMRI multivariate pattern analysis</atitle><jtitle>NeuroImage (Orlando, Fla.)</jtitle><addtitle>Neuroimage</addtitle><date>2016-05-15</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>132</volume><spage>32</spage><epage>42</epage><pages>32-42</pages><issn>1053-8119</issn><eissn>1095-9572</eissn><abstract>Multivariate pattern analysis (MVPA) in fMRI has been used to extract information from distributed cortical activation patterns, which may go undetected in conventional univariate analysis. However, little is known about the physical and physiological underpinnings of MVPA in fMRI as well as about the effect of spatial smoothing on its performance. Several studies have addressed these issues, but their investigation was limited to the visual cortex at 3T with conflicting results. Here, we used ultra-high field (7T) fMRI to investigate the effect of spatial resolution and smoothing on decoding of speech content (vowels) and speaker identity from auditory cortical responses. To that end, we acquired high-resolution (1.1mm isotropic) fMRI data and additionally reconstructed them at 2.2 and 3.3mm in-plane spatial resolutions from the original k-space data. Furthermore, the data at each resolution were spatially smoothed with different 3D Gaussian kernel sizes (i.e. no smoothing or 1.1, 2.2, 3.3, 4.4, or 8.8mm kernels). For all spatial resolutions and smoothing kernels, we demonstrate the feasibility of decoding speech content (vowel) and speaker identity at 7T using support vector machine (SVM) MVPA. In addition, we found that high spatial frequencies are informative for vowel decoding and that the relative contribution of high and low spatial frequencies is different across the two decoding tasks. Moderate smoothing (up to 2.2mm) improved the accuracies for both decoding of vowels and speakers, possibly due to reduction of noise (e.g. residual motion artifacts or instrument noise) while still preserving information at high spatial frequency. In summary, our results show that – even with the same stimuli and within the same brain areas – the optimal spatial resolution for MVPA in fMRI depends on the specific decoding task of interest.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>26899782</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.neuroimage.2016.02.033</doi><tpages>11</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1053-8119
ispartof NeuroImage (Orlando, Fla.), 2016-05, Vol.132, p.32-42
issn 1053-8119
1095-9572
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1787977513
source MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects 7 T
Acoustic Stimulation
Acquisitions & mergers
Adult
Auditory cortex
Brain - physiology
Brain Mapping - methods
Brain research
Experiments
Female
fMRI
Humans
Hypotheses
Image Processing, Computer-Assisted
Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Male
Multivariate Analysis
Multivariate pattern analysis
NMR
Noise
Nuclear magnetic resonance
Pattern Recognition, Automated
Signal Processing, Computer-Assisted
Spatial resolution
Spatial smoothing
Speech Perception
Studies
Support Vector Machine
Veins & arteries
title The effect of spatial resolution on decoding accuracy in fMRI multivariate pattern analysis
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-28T13%3A53%3A59IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20effect%20of%20spatial%20resolution%20on%20decoding%20accuracy%20in%20fMRI%20multivariate%20pattern%20analysis&rft.jtitle=NeuroImage%20(Orlando,%20Fla.)&rft.au=Gardumi,%20Anna&rft.date=2016-05-15&rft.volume=132&rft.spage=32&rft.epage=42&rft.pages=32-42&rft.issn=1053-8119&rft.eissn=1095-9572&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2016.02.033&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1786126231%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1786735292&rft_id=info:pmid/26899782&rft_els_id=S1053811916001427&rfr_iscdi=true