Standardizing communication from acute care providers to primary care providers on critically ill adults

To increase the frequency of communication of patient information between acute and primary care providers. A secondary objective was to determine whether higher rates of communication were associated with lower rates of hospital readmission 30 days after discharge. A validated instrument was used f...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:American journal of critical care 2015-11, Vol.24 (6), p.496-500
Hauptverfasser: Ellis, Kerri A, Connolly, Ann, Hosseinnezhad, Alireza, Lilly, Craig M
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 500
container_issue 6
container_start_page 496
container_title American journal of critical care
container_volume 24
creator Ellis, Kerri A
Connolly, Ann
Hosseinnezhad, Alireza
Lilly, Craig M
description To increase the frequency of communication of patient information between acute and primary care providers. A secondary objective was to determine whether higher rates of communication were associated with lower rates of hospital readmission 30 days after discharge. A validated instrument was used for telephone surveys before and after an intervention designed to increase the frequency of communication among acute care and primary care providers. The communication intervention was implemented in 3 adult intensive care units from 2 campuses of an academic medical center. The frequency of communication among acute care and primary care providers, the perceived usefulness of the intervention, and its association with 30-day readmission rates were assessed for 202 adult intensive care episodes before and 100 episodes after a communication intervention. The frequency of documented communication increased significantly (5/202 or 2% before to 72/100 or 72% after the intervention; P < .001) and the communication was considered useful by every participating primary care provider. Rates of rehospitalization at 30 days were lower for the intervention group than the preintervention group, but the difference was not statistically significant (41/202 or 23% vs 16/88 or 18% of discharged patients; P = .45; power 0.112 at P = .05). The frequency of communication episodes that provide value can be increased through standardized processes. The key aspects of this effective intervention were setting the expectation that communication should occur, documenting when communication has occurred, and reviewing that documentation during multiprofessional rounds.
doi_str_mv 10.4037/ajcc2015332
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1787766553</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1729352026</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c322t-1c55260101404469841abebcadd1b493a226a765fca7955861aa24717119b4f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkU1LxDAQhoMo7rp68i45ClLNd7ZHWfwCwYN78FamaapZ0laTVFh_vZFdRbx4mhnmmZeZdxA6puRcEK4vYGUMI1RyznbQlJZcF5qSp92cE8UKzpSYoIMYV4RQMdd6H02YkowToqfo5TFB30Bo3Ifrn7EZum7snYHkhh63YegwmDFZbCBY_BqGd9fYEHEacuE6COu_nTxmgktZwvs1dt5jaEaf4iHaa8FHe7SNM7S8vloubov7h5u7xeV9YThjqaBGSqYIzasSIVQ5FxRqWxtoGlqLkgNjCrSSrQFdSjlXFIAJTTWlZS1aPkOnG9m80dtoY6o6F431Hno7jLGiOjuglMxu_Y-ykktGmMro2QY1YYgx2LbaXl9RUn09ofr1hEyfbIXHurPND_vtOv8EgsKC5g</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1729352026</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Standardizing communication from acute care providers to primary care providers on critically ill adults</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Journals@Ovid Complete</source><creator>Ellis, Kerri A ; Connolly, Ann ; Hosseinnezhad, Alireza ; Lilly, Craig M</creator><creatorcontrib>Ellis, Kerri A ; Connolly, Ann ; Hosseinnezhad, Alireza ; Lilly, Craig M</creatorcontrib><description>To increase the frequency of communication of patient information between acute and primary care providers. A secondary objective was to determine whether higher rates of communication were associated with lower rates of hospital readmission 30 days after discharge. A validated instrument was used for telephone surveys before and after an intervention designed to increase the frequency of communication among acute care and primary care providers. The communication intervention was implemented in 3 adult intensive care units from 2 campuses of an academic medical center. The frequency of communication among acute care and primary care providers, the perceived usefulness of the intervention, and its association with 30-day readmission rates were assessed for 202 adult intensive care episodes before and 100 episodes after a communication intervention. The frequency of documented communication increased significantly (5/202 or 2% before to 72/100 or 72% after the intervention; P &lt; .001) and the communication was considered useful by every participating primary care provider. Rates of rehospitalization at 30 days were lower for the intervention group than the preintervention group, but the difference was not statistically significant (41/202 or 23% vs 16/88 or 18% of discharged patients; P = .45; power 0.112 at P = .05). The frequency of communication episodes that provide value can be increased through standardized processes. The key aspects of this effective intervention were setting the expectation that communication should occur, documenting when communication has occurred, and reviewing that documentation during multiprofessional rounds.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1062-3264</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1937-710X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.4037/ajcc2015332</identifier><identifier>PMID: 26523007</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States</publisher><subject>Aged ; Communication ; Continuity of Patient Care - statistics &amp; numerical data ; Critical Care ; Critical Illness ; Female ; Humans ; Intensive Care Units ; Length of Stay ; Male ; Nursing ; Patient Discharge ; Patient Readmission - statistics &amp; numerical data ; Primary Health Care</subject><ispartof>American journal of critical care, 2015-11, Vol.24 (6), p.496-500</ispartof><rights>2015 American Association of Critical-Care Nurses.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c322t-1c55260101404469841abebcadd1b493a226a765fca7955861aa24717119b4f3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27922,27923</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26523007$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ellis, Kerri A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Connolly, Ann</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hosseinnezhad, Alireza</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lilly, Craig M</creatorcontrib><title>Standardizing communication from acute care providers to primary care providers on critically ill adults</title><title>American journal of critical care</title><addtitle>Am J Crit Care</addtitle><description>To increase the frequency of communication of patient information between acute and primary care providers. A secondary objective was to determine whether higher rates of communication were associated with lower rates of hospital readmission 30 days after discharge. A validated instrument was used for telephone surveys before and after an intervention designed to increase the frequency of communication among acute care and primary care providers. The communication intervention was implemented in 3 adult intensive care units from 2 campuses of an academic medical center. The frequency of communication among acute care and primary care providers, the perceived usefulness of the intervention, and its association with 30-day readmission rates were assessed for 202 adult intensive care episodes before and 100 episodes after a communication intervention. The frequency of documented communication increased significantly (5/202 or 2% before to 72/100 or 72% after the intervention; P &lt; .001) and the communication was considered useful by every participating primary care provider. Rates of rehospitalization at 30 days were lower for the intervention group than the preintervention group, but the difference was not statistically significant (41/202 or 23% vs 16/88 or 18% of discharged patients; P = .45; power 0.112 at P = .05). The frequency of communication episodes that provide value can be increased through standardized processes. The key aspects of this effective intervention were setting the expectation that communication should occur, documenting when communication has occurred, and reviewing that documentation during multiprofessional rounds.</description><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Communication</subject><subject>Continuity of Patient Care - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Critical Care</subject><subject>Critical Illness</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Intensive Care Units</subject><subject>Length of Stay</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Nursing</subject><subject>Patient Discharge</subject><subject>Patient Readmission - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Primary Health Care</subject><issn>1062-3264</issn><issn>1937-710X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkU1LxDAQhoMo7rp68i45ClLNd7ZHWfwCwYN78FamaapZ0laTVFh_vZFdRbx4mhnmmZeZdxA6puRcEK4vYGUMI1RyznbQlJZcF5qSp92cE8UKzpSYoIMYV4RQMdd6H02YkowToqfo5TFB30Bo3Ifrn7EZum7snYHkhh63YegwmDFZbCBY_BqGd9fYEHEacuE6COu_nTxmgktZwvs1dt5jaEaf4iHaa8FHe7SNM7S8vloubov7h5u7xeV9YThjqaBGSqYIzasSIVQ5FxRqWxtoGlqLkgNjCrSSrQFdSjlXFIAJTTWlZS1aPkOnG9m80dtoY6o6F431Hno7jLGiOjuglMxu_Y-ykktGmMro2QY1YYgx2LbaXl9RUn09ofr1hEyfbIXHurPND_vtOv8EgsKC5g</recordid><startdate>20151101</startdate><enddate>20151101</enddate><creator>Ellis, Kerri A</creator><creator>Connolly, Ann</creator><creator>Hosseinnezhad, Alireza</creator><creator>Lilly, Craig M</creator><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>ASE</scope><scope>FPQ</scope><scope>K6X</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20151101</creationdate><title>Standardizing communication from acute care providers to primary care providers on critically ill adults</title><author>Ellis, Kerri A ; Connolly, Ann ; Hosseinnezhad, Alireza ; Lilly, Craig M</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c322t-1c55260101404469841abebcadd1b493a226a765fca7955861aa24717119b4f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Communication</topic><topic>Continuity of Patient Care - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Critical Care</topic><topic>Critical Illness</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Intensive Care Units</topic><topic>Length of Stay</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Nursing</topic><topic>Patient Discharge</topic><topic>Patient Readmission - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Primary Health Care</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ellis, Kerri A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Connolly, Ann</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hosseinnezhad, Alireza</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lilly, Craig M</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><collection>British Nursing Index (BNI) (1985 to Present)</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><jtitle>American journal of critical care</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ellis, Kerri A</au><au>Connolly, Ann</au><au>Hosseinnezhad, Alireza</au><au>Lilly, Craig M</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Standardizing communication from acute care providers to primary care providers on critically ill adults</atitle><jtitle>American journal of critical care</jtitle><addtitle>Am J Crit Care</addtitle><date>2015-11-01</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>24</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>496</spage><epage>500</epage><pages>496-500</pages><issn>1062-3264</issn><eissn>1937-710X</eissn><abstract>To increase the frequency of communication of patient information between acute and primary care providers. A secondary objective was to determine whether higher rates of communication were associated with lower rates of hospital readmission 30 days after discharge. A validated instrument was used for telephone surveys before and after an intervention designed to increase the frequency of communication among acute care and primary care providers. The communication intervention was implemented in 3 adult intensive care units from 2 campuses of an academic medical center. The frequency of communication among acute care and primary care providers, the perceived usefulness of the intervention, and its association with 30-day readmission rates were assessed for 202 adult intensive care episodes before and 100 episodes after a communication intervention. The frequency of documented communication increased significantly (5/202 or 2% before to 72/100 or 72% after the intervention; P &lt; .001) and the communication was considered useful by every participating primary care provider. Rates of rehospitalization at 30 days were lower for the intervention group than the preintervention group, but the difference was not statistically significant (41/202 or 23% vs 16/88 or 18% of discharged patients; P = .45; power 0.112 at P = .05). The frequency of communication episodes that provide value can be increased through standardized processes. The key aspects of this effective intervention were setting the expectation that communication should occur, documenting when communication has occurred, and reviewing that documentation during multiprofessional rounds.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pmid>26523007</pmid><doi>10.4037/ajcc2015332</doi><tpages>5</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1062-3264
ispartof American journal of critical care, 2015-11, Vol.24 (6), p.496-500
issn 1062-3264
1937-710X
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1787766553
source MEDLINE; Journals@Ovid Complete
subjects Aged
Communication
Continuity of Patient Care - statistics & numerical data
Critical Care
Critical Illness
Female
Humans
Intensive Care Units
Length of Stay
Male
Nursing
Patient Discharge
Patient Readmission - statistics & numerical data
Primary Health Care
title Standardizing communication from acute care providers to primary care providers on critically ill adults
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-14T11%3A38%3A57IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Standardizing%20communication%20from%20acute%20care%20providers%20to%20primary%20care%20providers%20on%20critically%20ill%20adults&rft.jtitle=American%20journal%20of%20critical%20care&rft.au=Ellis,%20Kerri%20A&rft.date=2015-11-01&rft.volume=24&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=496&rft.epage=500&rft.pages=496-500&rft.issn=1062-3264&rft.eissn=1937-710X&rft_id=info:doi/10.4037/ajcc2015332&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1729352026%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1729352026&rft_id=info:pmid/26523007&rfr_iscdi=true