Standardizing communication from acute care providers to primary care providers on critically ill adults
To increase the frequency of communication of patient information between acute and primary care providers. A secondary objective was to determine whether higher rates of communication were associated with lower rates of hospital readmission 30 days after discharge. A validated instrument was used f...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | American journal of critical care 2015-11, Vol.24 (6), p.496-500 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 500 |
---|---|
container_issue | 6 |
container_start_page | 496 |
container_title | American journal of critical care |
container_volume | 24 |
creator | Ellis, Kerri A Connolly, Ann Hosseinnezhad, Alireza Lilly, Craig M |
description | To increase the frequency of communication of patient information between acute and primary care providers. A secondary objective was to determine whether higher rates of communication were associated with lower rates of hospital readmission 30 days after discharge.
A validated instrument was used for telephone surveys before and after an intervention designed to increase the frequency of communication among acute care and primary care providers. The communication intervention was implemented in 3 adult intensive care units from 2 campuses of an academic medical center.
The frequency of communication among acute care and primary care providers, the perceived usefulness of the intervention, and its association with 30-day readmission rates were assessed for 202 adult intensive care episodes before and 100 episodes after a communication intervention. The frequency of documented communication increased significantly (5/202 or 2% before to 72/100 or 72% after the intervention; P < .001) and the communication was considered useful by every participating primary care provider. Rates of rehospitalization at 30 days were lower for the intervention group than the preintervention group, but the difference was not statistically significant (41/202 or 23% vs 16/88 or 18% of discharged patients; P = .45; power 0.112 at P = .05).
The frequency of communication episodes that provide value can be increased through standardized processes. The key aspects of this effective intervention were setting the expectation that communication should occur, documenting when communication has occurred, and reviewing that documentation during multiprofessional rounds. |
doi_str_mv | 10.4037/ajcc2015332 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1787766553</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1729352026</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c322t-1c55260101404469841abebcadd1b493a226a765fca7955861aa24717119b4f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkU1LxDAQhoMo7rp68i45ClLNd7ZHWfwCwYN78FamaapZ0laTVFh_vZFdRbx4mhnmmZeZdxA6puRcEK4vYGUMI1RyznbQlJZcF5qSp92cE8UKzpSYoIMYV4RQMdd6H02YkowToqfo5TFB30Bo3Ifrn7EZum7snYHkhh63YegwmDFZbCBY_BqGd9fYEHEacuE6COu_nTxmgktZwvs1dt5jaEaf4iHaa8FHe7SNM7S8vloubov7h5u7xeV9YThjqaBGSqYIzasSIVQ5FxRqWxtoGlqLkgNjCrSSrQFdSjlXFIAJTTWlZS1aPkOnG9m80dtoY6o6F431Hno7jLGiOjuglMxu_Y-ykktGmMro2QY1YYgx2LbaXl9RUn09ofr1hEyfbIXHurPND_vtOv8EgsKC5g</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1729352026</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Standardizing communication from acute care providers to primary care providers on critically ill adults</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Journals@Ovid Complete</source><creator>Ellis, Kerri A ; Connolly, Ann ; Hosseinnezhad, Alireza ; Lilly, Craig M</creator><creatorcontrib>Ellis, Kerri A ; Connolly, Ann ; Hosseinnezhad, Alireza ; Lilly, Craig M</creatorcontrib><description>To increase the frequency of communication of patient information between acute and primary care providers. A secondary objective was to determine whether higher rates of communication were associated with lower rates of hospital readmission 30 days after discharge.
A validated instrument was used for telephone surveys before and after an intervention designed to increase the frequency of communication among acute care and primary care providers. The communication intervention was implemented in 3 adult intensive care units from 2 campuses of an academic medical center.
The frequency of communication among acute care and primary care providers, the perceived usefulness of the intervention, and its association with 30-day readmission rates were assessed for 202 adult intensive care episodes before and 100 episodes after a communication intervention. The frequency of documented communication increased significantly (5/202 or 2% before to 72/100 or 72% after the intervention; P < .001) and the communication was considered useful by every participating primary care provider. Rates of rehospitalization at 30 days were lower for the intervention group than the preintervention group, but the difference was not statistically significant (41/202 or 23% vs 16/88 or 18% of discharged patients; P = .45; power 0.112 at P = .05).
The frequency of communication episodes that provide value can be increased through standardized processes. The key aspects of this effective intervention were setting the expectation that communication should occur, documenting when communication has occurred, and reviewing that documentation during multiprofessional rounds.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1062-3264</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1937-710X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.4037/ajcc2015332</identifier><identifier>PMID: 26523007</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States</publisher><subject>Aged ; Communication ; Continuity of Patient Care - statistics & numerical data ; Critical Care ; Critical Illness ; Female ; Humans ; Intensive Care Units ; Length of Stay ; Male ; Nursing ; Patient Discharge ; Patient Readmission - statistics & numerical data ; Primary Health Care</subject><ispartof>American journal of critical care, 2015-11, Vol.24 (6), p.496-500</ispartof><rights>2015 American Association of Critical-Care Nurses.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c322t-1c55260101404469841abebcadd1b493a226a765fca7955861aa24717119b4f3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27922,27923</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26523007$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ellis, Kerri A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Connolly, Ann</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hosseinnezhad, Alireza</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lilly, Craig M</creatorcontrib><title>Standardizing communication from acute care providers to primary care providers on critically ill adults</title><title>American journal of critical care</title><addtitle>Am J Crit Care</addtitle><description>To increase the frequency of communication of patient information between acute and primary care providers. A secondary objective was to determine whether higher rates of communication were associated with lower rates of hospital readmission 30 days after discharge.
A validated instrument was used for telephone surveys before and after an intervention designed to increase the frequency of communication among acute care and primary care providers. The communication intervention was implemented in 3 adult intensive care units from 2 campuses of an academic medical center.
The frequency of communication among acute care and primary care providers, the perceived usefulness of the intervention, and its association with 30-day readmission rates were assessed for 202 adult intensive care episodes before and 100 episodes after a communication intervention. The frequency of documented communication increased significantly (5/202 or 2% before to 72/100 or 72% after the intervention; P < .001) and the communication was considered useful by every participating primary care provider. Rates of rehospitalization at 30 days were lower for the intervention group than the preintervention group, but the difference was not statistically significant (41/202 or 23% vs 16/88 or 18% of discharged patients; P = .45; power 0.112 at P = .05).
The frequency of communication episodes that provide value can be increased through standardized processes. The key aspects of this effective intervention were setting the expectation that communication should occur, documenting when communication has occurred, and reviewing that documentation during multiprofessional rounds.</description><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Communication</subject><subject>Continuity of Patient Care - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>Critical Care</subject><subject>Critical Illness</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Intensive Care Units</subject><subject>Length of Stay</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Nursing</subject><subject>Patient Discharge</subject><subject>Patient Readmission - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>Primary Health Care</subject><issn>1062-3264</issn><issn>1937-710X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkU1LxDAQhoMo7rp68i45ClLNd7ZHWfwCwYN78FamaapZ0laTVFh_vZFdRbx4mhnmmZeZdxA6puRcEK4vYGUMI1RyznbQlJZcF5qSp92cE8UKzpSYoIMYV4RQMdd6H02YkowToqfo5TFB30Bo3Ifrn7EZum7snYHkhh63YegwmDFZbCBY_BqGd9fYEHEacuE6COu_nTxmgktZwvs1dt5jaEaf4iHaa8FHe7SNM7S8vloubov7h5u7xeV9YThjqaBGSqYIzasSIVQ5FxRqWxtoGlqLkgNjCrSSrQFdSjlXFIAJTTWlZS1aPkOnG9m80dtoY6o6F431Hno7jLGiOjuglMxu_Y-ykktGmMro2QY1YYgx2LbaXl9RUn09ofr1hEyfbIXHurPND_vtOv8EgsKC5g</recordid><startdate>20151101</startdate><enddate>20151101</enddate><creator>Ellis, Kerri A</creator><creator>Connolly, Ann</creator><creator>Hosseinnezhad, Alireza</creator><creator>Lilly, Craig M</creator><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>ASE</scope><scope>FPQ</scope><scope>K6X</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20151101</creationdate><title>Standardizing communication from acute care providers to primary care providers on critically ill adults</title><author>Ellis, Kerri A ; Connolly, Ann ; Hosseinnezhad, Alireza ; Lilly, Craig M</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c322t-1c55260101404469841abebcadd1b493a226a765fca7955861aa24717119b4f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Communication</topic><topic>Continuity of Patient Care - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>Critical Care</topic><topic>Critical Illness</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Intensive Care Units</topic><topic>Length of Stay</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Nursing</topic><topic>Patient Discharge</topic><topic>Patient Readmission - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>Primary Health Care</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ellis, Kerri A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Connolly, Ann</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hosseinnezhad, Alireza</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lilly, Craig M</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><collection>British Nursing Index (BNI) (1985 to Present)</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><jtitle>American journal of critical care</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ellis, Kerri A</au><au>Connolly, Ann</au><au>Hosseinnezhad, Alireza</au><au>Lilly, Craig M</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Standardizing communication from acute care providers to primary care providers on critically ill adults</atitle><jtitle>American journal of critical care</jtitle><addtitle>Am J Crit Care</addtitle><date>2015-11-01</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>24</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>496</spage><epage>500</epage><pages>496-500</pages><issn>1062-3264</issn><eissn>1937-710X</eissn><abstract>To increase the frequency of communication of patient information between acute and primary care providers. A secondary objective was to determine whether higher rates of communication were associated with lower rates of hospital readmission 30 days after discharge.
A validated instrument was used for telephone surveys before and after an intervention designed to increase the frequency of communication among acute care and primary care providers. The communication intervention was implemented in 3 adult intensive care units from 2 campuses of an academic medical center.
The frequency of communication among acute care and primary care providers, the perceived usefulness of the intervention, and its association with 30-day readmission rates were assessed for 202 adult intensive care episodes before and 100 episodes after a communication intervention. The frequency of documented communication increased significantly (5/202 or 2% before to 72/100 or 72% after the intervention; P < .001) and the communication was considered useful by every participating primary care provider. Rates of rehospitalization at 30 days were lower for the intervention group than the preintervention group, but the difference was not statistically significant (41/202 or 23% vs 16/88 or 18% of discharged patients; P = .45; power 0.112 at P = .05).
The frequency of communication episodes that provide value can be increased through standardized processes. The key aspects of this effective intervention were setting the expectation that communication should occur, documenting when communication has occurred, and reviewing that documentation during multiprofessional rounds.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pmid>26523007</pmid><doi>10.4037/ajcc2015332</doi><tpages>5</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1062-3264 |
ispartof | American journal of critical care, 2015-11, Vol.24 (6), p.496-500 |
issn | 1062-3264 1937-710X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1787766553 |
source | MEDLINE; Journals@Ovid Complete |
subjects | Aged Communication Continuity of Patient Care - statistics & numerical data Critical Care Critical Illness Female Humans Intensive Care Units Length of Stay Male Nursing Patient Discharge Patient Readmission - statistics & numerical data Primary Health Care |
title | Standardizing communication from acute care providers to primary care providers on critically ill adults |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-14T11%3A38%3A57IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Standardizing%20communication%20from%20acute%20care%20providers%20to%20primary%20care%20providers%20on%20critically%20ill%20adults&rft.jtitle=American%20journal%20of%20critical%20care&rft.au=Ellis,%20Kerri%20A&rft.date=2015-11-01&rft.volume=24&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=496&rft.epage=500&rft.pages=496-500&rft.issn=1062-3264&rft.eissn=1937-710X&rft_id=info:doi/10.4037/ajcc2015332&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1729352026%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1729352026&rft_id=info:pmid/26523007&rfr_iscdi=true |