Pilot Study of a New Nonradioactive Surgical Guidance Technology for Locating Nonpalpable Breast Lesions
Background The current technique for locating nonpalpable breast lesions is wire localization (WL). Radioactive seed localization and intraoperative ultrasound were developed to improve difficulties with WL. The SAVI SCOUT surgical guidance system was developed to improve these methods. The SCOUT sy...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Annals of surgical oncology 2016-06, Vol.23 (6), p.1824-1830 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1830 |
---|---|
container_issue | 6 |
container_start_page | 1824 |
container_title | Annals of surgical oncology |
container_volume | 23 |
creator | Cox, Charles E. Garcia-Henriquez, Norbert Glancy, M. Jordan Whitworth, Pat Cox, John M. Themar-Geck, Melissa Prati, Ronald Jung, Michelle Russell, Scott Appleton, Kristie King, Jeff Shivers, Steven C. |
description | Background
The current technique for locating nonpalpable breast lesions is wire localization (WL). Radioactive seed localization and intraoperative ultrasound were developed to improve difficulties with WL. The SAVI SCOUT surgical guidance system was developed to improve these methods. The SCOUT system is a non-radioactive, FDA-cleared medical device that uses electromagnetic wave technology to provide real-time guidance during excisional breast procedures.
Methods
Consenting patients underwent localization and excision using an implantable electromagnetic wave reflective device (reflector) and a detector handpiece with a console. Using image guidance, the reflector was placed up to 7 days before the surgical procedure. The primary end points of the study were successful reflector placement, localization, and retrieval. The secondary end points were percentage of clear margins, reexcision rates, days of placement before excision, and physician comparison with WL.
Results
This study analyzed 50 patients. The reflectors were placed under mammographic guidance (
n
= 18, 36 %) or ultrasound guidance (
n
= 32, 64 %). Of the 50 patients, 10 (20 %) underwent excisional biopsy and 40 (80 %) had a lumpectomy. The lesion and reflector were successfully removed in all 50 patients, and no adverse events occurred. Of the 41 patients who had in situ and/or invasive carcinoma identified, 38 (93 %) had clear margins and 3 (7 %) were recommended for reexcision.
Conclusions
These data suggest that the SCOUT system is safe and effective for guiding the excision of nonpalpable breast lesions and a viable alternative to standard localization options. A larger prospective, multi-institution trial of SCOUT currently is underway to validate these findings. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1245/s10434-015-5079-x |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1787473108</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>4046299661</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c372t-42c39dba4c26bd8f45701dcdf97aaaf1edae6f8faa1fdc3cf3bb1cf2ee346ef63</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kUFP3DAQha2KqlDaH9BLZakXLgE7duzkSBGlSCuKBD1bE3u8GGXjxU5a9t_Xy9KqQuI0o_H33ljzCPnE2TGvZXOSOZNCVow3VcN0Vz2-IQe8KROpWr5XeqbaqqtVs0_e53zPGNeCNe_Ifq1aqVXLDsjddRjiRG-m2W1o9BToFf6mV3FM4EIEO4VfSG_mtAwWBnoxBwejRXqL9m6MQ1xuqI-JLqKFKYzLrXANwxr6AenXhJAnusAc4pg_kLcehowfn-sh-fnt_Pbse7X4cXF5drqorND1VMnais71IG2tetd62WjGnXW-0wDgOTpA5VsPwL2zwnrR99z6GlFIhV6JQ3K0812n-DBjnswqZIvDACPGORuuWy214Kwt6JcX6H2c01h-90Qx0QjdFYrvKJtizgm9WaewgrQxnJltDGYXgykxmG0M5rFoPj87z_0K3T_F37sXoN4BuTyNS0z_rX7V9Q_LiJV4</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1787035379</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Pilot Study of a New Nonradioactive Surgical Guidance Technology for Locating Nonpalpable Breast Lesions</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals</source><creator>Cox, Charles E. ; Garcia-Henriquez, Norbert ; Glancy, M. Jordan ; Whitworth, Pat ; Cox, John M. ; Themar-Geck, Melissa ; Prati, Ronald ; Jung, Michelle ; Russell, Scott ; Appleton, Kristie ; King, Jeff ; Shivers, Steven C.</creator><creatorcontrib>Cox, Charles E. ; Garcia-Henriquez, Norbert ; Glancy, M. Jordan ; Whitworth, Pat ; Cox, John M. ; Themar-Geck, Melissa ; Prati, Ronald ; Jung, Michelle ; Russell, Scott ; Appleton, Kristie ; King, Jeff ; Shivers, Steven C.</creatorcontrib><description>Background
The current technique for locating nonpalpable breast lesions is wire localization (WL). Radioactive seed localization and intraoperative ultrasound were developed to improve difficulties with WL. The SAVI SCOUT surgical guidance system was developed to improve these methods. The SCOUT system is a non-radioactive, FDA-cleared medical device that uses electromagnetic wave technology to provide real-time guidance during excisional breast procedures.
Methods
Consenting patients underwent localization and excision using an implantable electromagnetic wave reflective device (reflector) and a detector handpiece with a console. Using image guidance, the reflector was placed up to 7 days before the surgical procedure. The primary end points of the study were successful reflector placement, localization, and retrieval. The secondary end points were percentage of clear margins, reexcision rates, days of placement before excision, and physician comparison with WL.
Results
This study analyzed 50 patients. The reflectors were placed under mammographic guidance (
n
= 18, 36 %) or ultrasound guidance (
n
= 32, 64 %). Of the 50 patients, 10 (20 %) underwent excisional biopsy and 40 (80 %) had a lumpectomy. The lesion and reflector were successfully removed in all 50 patients, and no adverse events occurred. Of the 41 patients who had in situ and/or invasive carcinoma identified, 38 (93 %) had clear margins and 3 (7 %) were recommended for reexcision.
Conclusions
These data suggest that the SCOUT system is safe and effective for guiding the excision of nonpalpable breast lesions and a viable alternative to standard localization options. A larger prospective, multi-institution trial of SCOUT currently is underway to validate these findings.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1068-9265</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1534-4681</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1245/s10434-015-5079-x</identifier><identifier>PMID: 26847680</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cham: Springer International Publishing</publisher><subject>Adult ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Breast Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging ; Breast Neoplasms - pathology ; Breast Neoplasms - surgery ; Breast Oncology ; Carcinoma, Intraductal, Noninfiltrating - diagnostic imaging ; Carcinoma, Intraductal, Noninfiltrating - pathology ; Carcinoma, Intraductal, Noninfiltrating - surgery ; Electromagnetic Radiation ; Female ; Follow-Up Studies ; Humans ; Mammography ; Mastectomy, Segmental ; Medicine ; Medicine & Public Health ; Middle Aged ; Neoplasm Invasiveness ; Neoplasm Seeding ; Oncology ; Pilot Projects ; Prognosis ; Surgery ; Surgery, Computer-Assisted - methods ; Surgical Oncology ; Ultrasonography, Mammary ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>Annals of surgical oncology, 2016-06, Vol.23 (6), p.1824-1830</ispartof><rights>Society of Surgical Oncology 2016</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c372t-42c39dba4c26bd8f45701dcdf97aaaf1edae6f8faa1fdc3cf3bb1cf2ee346ef63</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c372t-42c39dba4c26bd8f45701dcdf97aaaf1edae6f8faa1fdc3cf3bb1cf2ee346ef63</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1245/s10434-015-5079-x$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1245/s10434-015-5079-x$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27903,27904,41467,42536,51298</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26847680$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Cox, Charles E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Garcia-Henriquez, Norbert</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Glancy, M. Jordan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Whitworth, Pat</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cox, John M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Themar-Geck, Melissa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Prati, Ronald</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jung, Michelle</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Russell, Scott</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Appleton, Kristie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>King, Jeff</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shivers, Steven C.</creatorcontrib><title>Pilot Study of a New Nonradioactive Surgical Guidance Technology for Locating Nonpalpable Breast Lesions</title><title>Annals of surgical oncology</title><addtitle>Ann Surg Oncol</addtitle><addtitle>Ann Surg Oncol</addtitle><description>Background
The current technique for locating nonpalpable breast lesions is wire localization (WL). Radioactive seed localization and intraoperative ultrasound were developed to improve difficulties with WL. The SAVI SCOUT surgical guidance system was developed to improve these methods. The SCOUT system is a non-radioactive, FDA-cleared medical device that uses electromagnetic wave technology to provide real-time guidance during excisional breast procedures.
Methods
Consenting patients underwent localization and excision using an implantable electromagnetic wave reflective device (reflector) and a detector handpiece with a console. Using image guidance, the reflector was placed up to 7 days before the surgical procedure. The primary end points of the study were successful reflector placement, localization, and retrieval. The secondary end points were percentage of clear margins, reexcision rates, days of placement before excision, and physician comparison with WL.
Results
This study analyzed 50 patients. The reflectors were placed under mammographic guidance (
n
= 18, 36 %) or ultrasound guidance (
n
= 32, 64 %). Of the 50 patients, 10 (20 %) underwent excisional biopsy and 40 (80 %) had a lumpectomy. The lesion and reflector were successfully removed in all 50 patients, and no adverse events occurred. Of the 41 patients who had in situ and/or invasive carcinoma identified, 38 (93 %) had clear margins and 3 (7 %) were recommended for reexcision.
Conclusions
These data suggest that the SCOUT system is safe and effective for guiding the excision of nonpalpable breast lesions and a viable alternative to standard localization options. A larger prospective, multi-institution trial of SCOUT currently is underway to validate these findings.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Breast Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Breast Neoplasms - pathology</subject><subject>Breast Neoplasms - surgery</subject><subject>Breast Oncology</subject><subject>Carcinoma, Intraductal, Noninfiltrating - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Carcinoma, Intraductal, Noninfiltrating - pathology</subject><subject>Carcinoma, Intraductal, Noninfiltrating - surgery</subject><subject>Electromagnetic Radiation</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Follow-Up Studies</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Mammography</subject><subject>Mastectomy, Segmental</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine & Public Health</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Neoplasm Invasiveness</subject><subject>Neoplasm Seeding</subject><subject>Oncology</subject><subject>Pilot Projects</subject><subject>Prognosis</subject><subject>Surgery</subject><subject>Surgery, Computer-Assisted - methods</subject><subject>Surgical Oncology</subject><subject>Ultrasonography, Mammary</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>1068-9265</issn><issn>1534-4681</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kUFP3DAQha2KqlDaH9BLZakXLgE7duzkSBGlSCuKBD1bE3u8GGXjxU5a9t_Xy9KqQuI0o_H33ljzCPnE2TGvZXOSOZNCVow3VcN0Vz2-IQe8KROpWr5XeqbaqqtVs0_e53zPGNeCNe_Ifq1aqVXLDsjddRjiRG-m2W1o9BToFf6mV3FM4EIEO4VfSG_mtAwWBnoxBwejRXqL9m6MQ1xuqI-JLqKFKYzLrXANwxr6AenXhJAnusAc4pg_kLcehowfn-sh-fnt_Pbse7X4cXF5drqorND1VMnais71IG2tetd62WjGnXW-0wDgOTpA5VsPwL2zwnrR99z6GlFIhV6JQ3K0812n-DBjnswqZIvDACPGORuuWy214Kwt6JcX6H2c01h-90Qx0QjdFYrvKJtizgm9WaewgrQxnJltDGYXgykxmG0M5rFoPj87z_0K3T_F37sXoN4BuTyNS0z_rX7V9Q_LiJV4</recordid><startdate>20160601</startdate><enddate>20160601</enddate><creator>Cox, Charles E.</creator><creator>Garcia-Henriquez, Norbert</creator><creator>Glancy, M. Jordan</creator><creator>Whitworth, Pat</creator><creator>Cox, John M.</creator><creator>Themar-Geck, Melissa</creator><creator>Prati, Ronald</creator><creator>Jung, Michelle</creator><creator>Russell, Scott</creator><creator>Appleton, Kristie</creator><creator>King, Jeff</creator><creator>Shivers, Steven C.</creator><general>Springer International Publishing</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7TO</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20160601</creationdate><title>Pilot Study of a New Nonradioactive Surgical Guidance Technology for Locating Nonpalpable Breast Lesions</title><author>Cox, Charles E. ; Garcia-Henriquez, Norbert ; Glancy, M. Jordan ; Whitworth, Pat ; Cox, John M. ; Themar-Geck, Melissa ; Prati, Ronald ; Jung, Michelle ; Russell, Scott ; Appleton, Kristie ; King, Jeff ; Shivers, Steven C.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c372t-42c39dba4c26bd8f45701dcdf97aaaf1edae6f8faa1fdc3cf3bb1cf2ee346ef63</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Breast Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Breast Neoplasms - pathology</topic><topic>Breast Neoplasms - surgery</topic><topic>Breast Oncology</topic><topic>Carcinoma, Intraductal, Noninfiltrating - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Carcinoma, Intraductal, Noninfiltrating - pathology</topic><topic>Carcinoma, Intraductal, Noninfiltrating - surgery</topic><topic>Electromagnetic Radiation</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Follow-Up Studies</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Mammography</topic><topic>Mastectomy, Segmental</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine & Public Health</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Neoplasm Invasiveness</topic><topic>Neoplasm Seeding</topic><topic>Oncology</topic><topic>Pilot Projects</topic><topic>Prognosis</topic><topic>Surgery</topic><topic>Surgery, Computer-Assisted - methods</topic><topic>Surgical Oncology</topic><topic>Ultrasonography, Mammary</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Cox, Charles E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Garcia-Henriquez, Norbert</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Glancy, M. Jordan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Whitworth, Pat</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cox, John M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Themar-Geck, Melissa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Prati, Ronald</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jung, Michelle</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Russell, Scott</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Appleton, Kristie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>King, Jeff</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shivers, Steven C.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Oncogenes and Growth Factors Abstracts</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Annals of surgical oncology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Cox, Charles E.</au><au>Garcia-Henriquez, Norbert</au><au>Glancy, M. Jordan</au><au>Whitworth, Pat</au><au>Cox, John M.</au><au>Themar-Geck, Melissa</au><au>Prati, Ronald</au><au>Jung, Michelle</au><au>Russell, Scott</au><au>Appleton, Kristie</au><au>King, Jeff</au><au>Shivers, Steven C.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Pilot Study of a New Nonradioactive Surgical Guidance Technology for Locating Nonpalpable Breast Lesions</atitle><jtitle>Annals of surgical oncology</jtitle><stitle>Ann Surg Oncol</stitle><addtitle>Ann Surg Oncol</addtitle><date>2016-06-01</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>23</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>1824</spage><epage>1830</epage><pages>1824-1830</pages><issn>1068-9265</issn><eissn>1534-4681</eissn><abstract>Background
The current technique for locating nonpalpable breast lesions is wire localization (WL). Radioactive seed localization and intraoperative ultrasound were developed to improve difficulties with WL. The SAVI SCOUT surgical guidance system was developed to improve these methods. The SCOUT system is a non-radioactive, FDA-cleared medical device that uses electromagnetic wave technology to provide real-time guidance during excisional breast procedures.
Methods
Consenting patients underwent localization and excision using an implantable electromagnetic wave reflective device (reflector) and a detector handpiece with a console. Using image guidance, the reflector was placed up to 7 days before the surgical procedure. The primary end points of the study were successful reflector placement, localization, and retrieval. The secondary end points were percentage of clear margins, reexcision rates, days of placement before excision, and physician comparison with WL.
Results
This study analyzed 50 patients. The reflectors were placed under mammographic guidance (
n
= 18, 36 %) or ultrasound guidance (
n
= 32, 64 %). Of the 50 patients, 10 (20 %) underwent excisional biopsy and 40 (80 %) had a lumpectomy. The lesion and reflector were successfully removed in all 50 patients, and no adverse events occurred. Of the 41 patients who had in situ and/or invasive carcinoma identified, 38 (93 %) had clear margins and 3 (7 %) were recommended for reexcision.
Conclusions
These data suggest that the SCOUT system is safe and effective for guiding the excision of nonpalpable breast lesions and a viable alternative to standard localization options. A larger prospective, multi-institution trial of SCOUT currently is underway to validate these findings.</abstract><cop>Cham</cop><pub>Springer International Publishing</pub><pmid>26847680</pmid><doi>10.1245/s10434-015-5079-x</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1068-9265 |
ispartof | Annals of surgical oncology, 2016-06, Vol.23 (6), p.1824-1830 |
issn | 1068-9265 1534-4681 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1787473108 |
source | MEDLINE; Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals |
subjects | Adult Aged Aged, 80 and over Breast Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging Breast Neoplasms - pathology Breast Neoplasms - surgery Breast Oncology Carcinoma, Intraductal, Noninfiltrating - diagnostic imaging Carcinoma, Intraductal, Noninfiltrating - pathology Carcinoma, Intraductal, Noninfiltrating - surgery Electromagnetic Radiation Female Follow-Up Studies Humans Mammography Mastectomy, Segmental Medicine Medicine & Public Health Middle Aged Neoplasm Invasiveness Neoplasm Seeding Oncology Pilot Projects Prognosis Surgery Surgery, Computer-Assisted - methods Surgical Oncology Ultrasonography, Mammary Young Adult |
title | Pilot Study of a New Nonradioactive Surgical Guidance Technology for Locating Nonpalpable Breast Lesions |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-22T08%3A01%3A04IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Pilot%20Study%20of%20a%20New%20Nonradioactive%20Surgical%20Guidance%20Technology%20for%20Locating%20Nonpalpable%20Breast%20Lesions&rft.jtitle=Annals%20of%20surgical%20oncology&rft.au=Cox,%20Charles%20E.&rft.date=2016-06-01&rft.volume=23&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=1824&rft.epage=1830&rft.pages=1824-1830&rft.issn=1068-9265&rft.eissn=1534-4681&rft_id=info:doi/10.1245/s10434-015-5079-x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E4046299661%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1787035379&rft_id=info:pmid/26847680&rfr_iscdi=true |