Pilot Study of a New Nonradioactive Surgical Guidance Technology for Locating Nonpalpable Breast Lesions

Background The current technique for locating nonpalpable breast lesions is wire localization (WL). Radioactive seed localization and intraoperative ultrasound were developed to improve difficulties with WL. The SAVI SCOUT surgical guidance system was developed to improve these methods. The SCOUT sy...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Annals of surgical oncology 2016-06, Vol.23 (6), p.1824-1830
Hauptverfasser: Cox, Charles E., Garcia-Henriquez, Norbert, Glancy, M. Jordan, Whitworth, Pat, Cox, John M., Themar-Geck, Melissa, Prati, Ronald, Jung, Michelle, Russell, Scott, Appleton, Kristie, King, Jeff, Shivers, Steven C.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1830
container_issue 6
container_start_page 1824
container_title Annals of surgical oncology
container_volume 23
creator Cox, Charles E.
Garcia-Henriquez, Norbert
Glancy, M. Jordan
Whitworth, Pat
Cox, John M.
Themar-Geck, Melissa
Prati, Ronald
Jung, Michelle
Russell, Scott
Appleton, Kristie
King, Jeff
Shivers, Steven C.
description Background The current technique for locating nonpalpable breast lesions is wire localization (WL). Radioactive seed localization and intraoperative ultrasound were developed to improve difficulties with WL. The SAVI SCOUT surgical guidance system was developed to improve these methods. The SCOUT system is a non-radioactive, FDA-cleared medical device that uses electromagnetic wave technology to provide real-time guidance during excisional breast procedures. Methods Consenting patients underwent localization and excision using an implantable electromagnetic wave reflective device (reflector) and a detector handpiece with a console. Using image guidance, the reflector was placed up to 7 days before the surgical procedure. The primary end points of the study were successful reflector placement, localization, and retrieval. The secondary end points were percentage of clear margins, reexcision rates, days of placement before excision, and physician comparison with WL. Results This study analyzed 50 patients. The reflectors were placed under mammographic guidance ( n  = 18, 36 %) or ultrasound guidance ( n  = 32, 64 %). Of the 50 patients, 10 (20 %) underwent excisional biopsy and 40 (80 %) had a lumpectomy. The lesion and reflector were successfully removed in all 50 patients, and no adverse events occurred. Of the 41 patients who had in situ and/or invasive carcinoma identified, 38 (93 %) had clear margins and 3 (7 %) were recommended for reexcision. Conclusions These data suggest that the SCOUT system is safe and effective for guiding the excision of nonpalpable breast lesions and a viable alternative to standard localization options. A larger prospective, multi-institution trial of SCOUT currently is underway to validate these findings.
doi_str_mv 10.1245/s10434-015-5079-x
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1787473108</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>4046299661</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c372t-42c39dba4c26bd8f45701dcdf97aaaf1edae6f8faa1fdc3cf3bb1cf2ee346ef63</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kUFP3DAQha2KqlDaH9BLZakXLgE7duzkSBGlSCuKBD1bE3u8GGXjxU5a9t_Xy9KqQuI0o_H33ljzCPnE2TGvZXOSOZNCVow3VcN0Vz2-IQe8KROpWr5XeqbaqqtVs0_e53zPGNeCNe_Ifq1aqVXLDsjddRjiRG-m2W1o9BToFf6mV3FM4EIEO4VfSG_mtAwWBnoxBwejRXqL9m6MQ1xuqI-JLqKFKYzLrXANwxr6AenXhJAnusAc4pg_kLcehowfn-sh-fnt_Pbse7X4cXF5drqorND1VMnais71IG2tetd62WjGnXW-0wDgOTpA5VsPwL2zwnrR99z6GlFIhV6JQ3K0812n-DBjnswqZIvDACPGORuuWy214Kwt6JcX6H2c01h-90Qx0QjdFYrvKJtizgm9WaewgrQxnJltDGYXgykxmG0M5rFoPj87z_0K3T_F37sXoN4BuTyNS0z_rX7V9Q_LiJV4</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1787035379</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Pilot Study of a New Nonradioactive Surgical Guidance Technology for Locating Nonpalpable Breast Lesions</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals</source><creator>Cox, Charles E. ; Garcia-Henriquez, Norbert ; Glancy, M. Jordan ; Whitworth, Pat ; Cox, John M. ; Themar-Geck, Melissa ; Prati, Ronald ; Jung, Michelle ; Russell, Scott ; Appleton, Kristie ; King, Jeff ; Shivers, Steven C.</creator><creatorcontrib>Cox, Charles E. ; Garcia-Henriquez, Norbert ; Glancy, M. Jordan ; Whitworth, Pat ; Cox, John M. ; Themar-Geck, Melissa ; Prati, Ronald ; Jung, Michelle ; Russell, Scott ; Appleton, Kristie ; King, Jeff ; Shivers, Steven C.</creatorcontrib><description>Background The current technique for locating nonpalpable breast lesions is wire localization (WL). Radioactive seed localization and intraoperative ultrasound were developed to improve difficulties with WL. The SAVI SCOUT surgical guidance system was developed to improve these methods. The SCOUT system is a non-radioactive, FDA-cleared medical device that uses electromagnetic wave technology to provide real-time guidance during excisional breast procedures. Methods Consenting patients underwent localization and excision using an implantable electromagnetic wave reflective device (reflector) and a detector handpiece with a console. Using image guidance, the reflector was placed up to 7 days before the surgical procedure. The primary end points of the study were successful reflector placement, localization, and retrieval. The secondary end points were percentage of clear margins, reexcision rates, days of placement before excision, and physician comparison with WL. Results This study analyzed 50 patients. The reflectors were placed under mammographic guidance ( n  = 18, 36 %) or ultrasound guidance ( n  = 32, 64 %). Of the 50 patients, 10 (20 %) underwent excisional biopsy and 40 (80 %) had a lumpectomy. The lesion and reflector were successfully removed in all 50 patients, and no adverse events occurred. Of the 41 patients who had in situ and/or invasive carcinoma identified, 38 (93 %) had clear margins and 3 (7 %) were recommended for reexcision. Conclusions These data suggest that the SCOUT system is safe and effective for guiding the excision of nonpalpable breast lesions and a viable alternative to standard localization options. A larger prospective, multi-institution trial of SCOUT currently is underway to validate these findings.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1068-9265</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1534-4681</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1245/s10434-015-5079-x</identifier><identifier>PMID: 26847680</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cham: Springer International Publishing</publisher><subject>Adult ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Breast Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging ; Breast Neoplasms - pathology ; Breast Neoplasms - surgery ; Breast Oncology ; Carcinoma, Intraductal, Noninfiltrating - diagnostic imaging ; Carcinoma, Intraductal, Noninfiltrating - pathology ; Carcinoma, Intraductal, Noninfiltrating - surgery ; Electromagnetic Radiation ; Female ; Follow-Up Studies ; Humans ; Mammography ; Mastectomy, Segmental ; Medicine ; Medicine &amp; Public Health ; Middle Aged ; Neoplasm Invasiveness ; Neoplasm Seeding ; Oncology ; Pilot Projects ; Prognosis ; Surgery ; Surgery, Computer-Assisted - methods ; Surgical Oncology ; Ultrasonography, Mammary ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>Annals of surgical oncology, 2016-06, Vol.23 (6), p.1824-1830</ispartof><rights>Society of Surgical Oncology 2016</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c372t-42c39dba4c26bd8f45701dcdf97aaaf1edae6f8faa1fdc3cf3bb1cf2ee346ef63</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c372t-42c39dba4c26bd8f45701dcdf97aaaf1edae6f8faa1fdc3cf3bb1cf2ee346ef63</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1245/s10434-015-5079-x$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1245/s10434-015-5079-x$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27903,27904,41467,42536,51298</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26847680$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Cox, Charles E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Garcia-Henriquez, Norbert</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Glancy, M. Jordan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Whitworth, Pat</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cox, John M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Themar-Geck, Melissa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Prati, Ronald</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jung, Michelle</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Russell, Scott</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Appleton, Kristie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>King, Jeff</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shivers, Steven C.</creatorcontrib><title>Pilot Study of a New Nonradioactive Surgical Guidance Technology for Locating Nonpalpable Breast Lesions</title><title>Annals of surgical oncology</title><addtitle>Ann Surg Oncol</addtitle><addtitle>Ann Surg Oncol</addtitle><description>Background The current technique for locating nonpalpable breast lesions is wire localization (WL). Radioactive seed localization and intraoperative ultrasound were developed to improve difficulties with WL. The SAVI SCOUT surgical guidance system was developed to improve these methods. The SCOUT system is a non-radioactive, FDA-cleared medical device that uses electromagnetic wave technology to provide real-time guidance during excisional breast procedures. Methods Consenting patients underwent localization and excision using an implantable electromagnetic wave reflective device (reflector) and a detector handpiece with a console. Using image guidance, the reflector was placed up to 7 days before the surgical procedure. The primary end points of the study were successful reflector placement, localization, and retrieval. The secondary end points were percentage of clear margins, reexcision rates, days of placement before excision, and physician comparison with WL. Results This study analyzed 50 patients. The reflectors were placed under mammographic guidance ( n  = 18, 36 %) or ultrasound guidance ( n  = 32, 64 %). Of the 50 patients, 10 (20 %) underwent excisional biopsy and 40 (80 %) had a lumpectomy. The lesion and reflector were successfully removed in all 50 patients, and no adverse events occurred. Of the 41 patients who had in situ and/or invasive carcinoma identified, 38 (93 %) had clear margins and 3 (7 %) were recommended for reexcision. Conclusions These data suggest that the SCOUT system is safe and effective for guiding the excision of nonpalpable breast lesions and a viable alternative to standard localization options. A larger prospective, multi-institution trial of SCOUT currently is underway to validate these findings.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Breast Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Breast Neoplasms - pathology</subject><subject>Breast Neoplasms - surgery</subject><subject>Breast Oncology</subject><subject>Carcinoma, Intraductal, Noninfiltrating - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Carcinoma, Intraductal, Noninfiltrating - pathology</subject><subject>Carcinoma, Intraductal, Noninfiltrating - surgery</subject><subject>Electromagnetic Radiation</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Follow-Up Studies</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Mammography</subject><subject>Mastectomy, Segmental</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine &amp; Public Health</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Neoplasm Invasiveness</subject><subject>Neoplasm Seeding</subject><subject>Oncology</subject><subject>Pilot Projects</subject><subject>Prognosis</subject><subject>Surgery</subject><subject>Surgery, Computer-Assisted - methods</subject><subject>Surgical Oncology</subject><subject>Ultrasonography, Mammary</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>1068-9265</issn><issn>1534-4681</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kUFP3DAQha2KqlDaH9BLZakXLgE7duzkSBGlSCuKBD1bE3u8GGXjxU5a9t_Xy9KqQuI0o_H33ljzCPnE2TGvZXOSOZNCVow3VcN0Vz2-IQe8KROpWr5XeqbaqqtVs0_e53zPGNeCNe_Ifq1aqVXLDsjddRjiRG-m2W1o9BToFf6mV3FM4EIEO4VfSG_mtAwWBnoxBwejRXqL9m6MQ1xuqI-JLqKFKYzLrXANwxr6AenXhJAnusAc4pg_kLcehowfn-sh-fnt_Pbse7X4cXF5drqorND1VMnais71IG2tetd62WjGnXW-0wDgOTpA5VsPwL2zwnrR99z6GlFIhV6JQ3K0812n-DBjnswqZIvDACPGORuuWy214Kwt6JcX6H2c01h-90Qx0QjdFYrvKJtizgm9WaewgrQxnJltDGYXgykxmG0M5rFoPj87z_0K3T_F37sXoN4BuTyNS0z_rX7V9Q_LiJV4</recordid><startdate>20160601</startdate><enddate>20160601</enddate><creator>Cox, Charles E.</creator><creator>Garcia-Henriquez, Norbert</creator><creator>Glancy, M. Jordan</creator><creator>Whitworth, Pat</creator><creator>Cox, John M.</creator><creator>Themar-Geck, Melissa</creator><creator>Prati, Ronald</creator><creator>Jung, Michelle</creator><creator>Russell, Scott</creator><creator>Appleton, Kristie</creator><creator>King, Jeff</creator><creator>Shivers, Steven C.</creator><general>Springer International Publishing</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7TO</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20160601</creationdate><title>Pilot Study of a New Nonradioactive Surgical Guidance Technology for Locating Nonpalpable Breast Lesions</title><author>Cox, Charles E. ; Garcia-Henriquez, Norbert ; Glancy, M. Jordan ; Whitworth, Pat ; Cox, John M. ; Themar-Geck, Melissa ; Prati, Ronald ; Jung, Michelle ; Russell, Scott ; Appleton, Kristie ; King, Jeff ; Shivers, Steven C.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c372t-42c39dba4c26bd8f45701dcdf97aaaf1edae6f8faa1fdc3cf3bb1cf2ee346ef63</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Breast Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Breast Neoplasms - pathology</topic><topic>Breast Neoplasms - surgery</topic><topic>Breast Oncology</topic><topic>Carcinoma, Intraductal, Noninfiltrating - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Carcinoma, Intraductal, Noninfiltrating - pathology</topic><topic>Carcinoma, Intraductal, Noninfiltrating - surgery</topic><topic>Electromagnetic Radiation</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Follow-Up Studies</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Mammography</topic><topic>Mastectomy, Segmental</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine &amp; Public Health</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Neoplasm Invasiveness</topic><topic>Neoplasm Seeding</topic><topic>Oncology</topic><topic>Pilot Projects</topic><topic>Prognosis</topic><topic>Surgery</topic><topic>Surgery, Computer-Assisted - methods</topic><topic>Surgical Oncology</topic><topic>Ultrasonography, Mammary</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Cox, Charles E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Garcia-Henriquez, Norbert</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Glancy, M. Jordan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Whitworth, Pat</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cox, John M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Themar-Geck, Melissa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Prati, Ronald</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jung, Michelle</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Russell, Scott</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Appleton, Kristie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>King, Jeff</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shivers, Steven C.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Oncogenes and Growth Factors Abstracts</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Annals of surgical oncology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Cox, Charles E.</au><au>Garcia-Henriquez, Norbert</au><au>Glancy, M. Jordan</au><au>Whitworth, Pat</au><au>Cox, John M.</au><au>Themar-Geck, Melissa</au><au>Prati, Ronald</au><au>Jung, Michelle</au><au>Russell, Scott</au><au>Appleton, Kristie</au><au>King, Jeff</au><au>Shivers, Steven C.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Pilot Study of a New Nonradioactive Surgical Guidance Technology for Locating Nonpalpable Breast Lesions</atitle><jtitle>Annals of surgical oncology</jtitle><stitle>Ann Surg Oncol</stitle><addtitle>Ann Surg Oncol</addtitle><date>2016-06-01</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>23</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>1824</spage><epage>1830</epage><pages>1824-1830</pages><issn>1068-9265</issn><eissn>1534-4681</eissn><abstract>Background The current technique for locating nonpalpable breast lesions is wire localization (WL). Radioactive seed localization and intraoperative ultrasound were developed to improve difficulties with WL. The SAVI SCOUT surgical guidance system was developed to improve these methods. The SCOUT system is a non-radioactive, FDA-cleared medical device that uses electromagnetic wave technology to provide real-time guidance during excisional breast procedures. Methods Consenting patients underwent localization and excision using an implantable electromagnetic wave reflective device (reflector) and a detector handpiece with a console. Using image guidance, the reflector was placed up to 7 days before the surgical procedure. The primary end points of the study were successful reflector placement, localization, and retrieval. The secondary end points were percentage of clear margins, reexcision rates, days of placement before excision, and physician comparison with WL. Results This study analyzed 50 patients. The reflectors were placed under mammographic guidance ( n  = 18, 36 %) or ultrasound guidance ( n  = 32, 64 %). Of the 50 patients, 10 (20 %) underwent excisional biopsy and 40 (80 %) had a lumpectomy. The lesion and reflector were successfully removed in all 50 patients, and no adverse events occurred. Of the 41 patients who had in situ and/or invasive carcinoma identified, 38 (93 %) had clear margins and 3 (7 %) were recommended for reexcision. Conclusions These data suggest that the SCOUT system is safe and effective for guiding the excision of nonpalpable breast lesions and a viable alternative to standard localization options. A larger prospective, multi-institution trial of SCOUT currently is underway to validate these findings.</abstract><cop>Cham</cop><pub>Springer International Publishing</pub><pmid>26847680</pmid><doi>10.1245/s10434-015-5079-x</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1068-9265
ispartof Annals of surgical oncology, 2016-06, Vol.23 (6), p.1824-1830
issn 1068-9265
1534-4681
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1787473108
source MEDLINE; Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals
subjects Adult
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Breast Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging
Breast Neoplasms - pathology
Breast Neoplasms - surgery
Breast Oncology
Carcinoma, Intraductal, Noninfiltrating - diagnostic imaging
Carcinoma, Intraductal, Noninfiltrating - pathology
Carcinoma, Intraductal, Noninfiltrating - surgery
Electromagnetic Radiation
Female
Follow-Up Studies
Humans
Mammography
Mastectomy, Segmental
Medicine
Medicine & Public Health
Middle Aged
Neoplasm Invasiveness
Neoplasm Seeding
Oncology
Pilot Projects
Prognosis
Surgery
Surgery, Computer-Assisted - methods
Surgical Oncology
Ultrasonography, Mammary
Young Adult
title Pilot Study of a New Nonradioactive Surgical Guidance Technology for Locating Nonpalpable Breast Lesions
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-22T08%3A01%3A04IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Pilot%20Study%20of%20a%20New%20Nonradioactive%20Surgical%20Guidance%20Technology%20for%20Locating%20Nonpalpable%20Breast%20Lesions&rft.jtitle=Annals%20of%20surgical%20oncology&rft.au=Cox,%20Charles%20E.&rft.date=2016-06-01&rft.volume=23&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=1824&rft.epage=1830&rft.pages=1824-1830&rft.issn=1068-9265&rft.eissn=1534-4681&rft_id=info:doi/10.1245/s10434-015-5079-x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E4046299661%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1787035379&rft_id=info:pmid/26847680&rfr_iscdi=true