The ManyBugs and IntroClass Benchmarks for Automated Repair of C Programs
The field of automated software repair lacks a set of common benchmark problems. Although benchmark sets are used widely throughout computer science, existing benchmarks are not easily adapted to the problem of automatic defect repair, which has several special requirements. Most important of these...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | IEEE transactions on software engineering 2015-12, Vol.41 (12), p.1236-1256 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext bestellen |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1256 |
---|---|
container_issue | 12 |
container_start_page | 1236 |
container_title | IEEE transactions on software engineering |
container_volume | 41 |
creator | Le Goues, Claire Holtschulte, Neal Smith, Edward K. Brun, Yuriy Devanbu, Premkumar Forrest, Stephanie Weimer, Westley |
description | The field of automated software repair lacks a set of common benchmark problems. Although benchmark sets are used widely throughout computer science, existing benchmarks are not easily adapted to the problem of automatic defect repair, which has several special requirements. Most important of these is the need for benchmark programs with reproducible, important defects and a deterministic method for assessing if those defects have been repaired. This article details the need for a new set of benchmarks, outlines requirements, and then presents two datasets, ManyBugs and IntroClass, consisting between them of 1,183 defects in 15 C programs. Each dataset is designed to support the comparative evaluation of automatic repair algorithms asking a variety of experimental questions. The datasets have empirically defined guarantees of reproducibility and benchmark quality, and each study object is categorized to facilitate qualitative evaluation and comparisons by category of bug or program. The article presents baseline experimental results on both datasets for three existing repair methods, GenProg, AE, and TrpAutoRepair, to reduce the burden on researchers who adopt these datasets for their own comparative evaluations. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1109/TSE.2015.2454513 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_RIE</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1786210228</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ieee_id>7153570</ieee_id><sourcerecordid>3936541631</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c432t-a70fccb2cd828a9f82a10674ddde24668e7be2592f1b7cdfe3091ceb46f9a8153</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkLFOwzAURS0EEqWwI7FYYmFJsZ04tsc2KlCpCARljhznuU1J4mInQ_-eVK0YmN5y7tV9B6FbSiaUEvW4-pxPGKF8whKecBqfoRFVsYpizsg5GhGiZMS5VJfoKoQtIYQLwUdosdoAftXtftavA9ZtiRdt511W6xDwDFqzabT_Dtg6j6d95xrdQYk_YKcrj53FGX73bu11E67RhdV1gJvTHaOvp_kqe4mWb8-LbLqMTBKzLtKCWGMKZkrJpFZWMk1JKpKyLIElaSpBFMC4YpYWwpQWYqKogSJJrdKS8niMHo69O-9-eghd3lTBQF3rFlwfcipkyihhTA7o_T9063rfDusGKqWUMpbGA0WOlPEuBA823_lq-HqfU5If3OaD2_zgNj-5HSJ3x0gFAH-4GNZxQeJfYchz2g</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1761112263</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The ManyBugs and IntroClass Benchmarks for Automated Repair of C Programs</title><source>IEEE Electronic Library (IEL)</source><creator>Le Goues, Claire ; Holtschulte, Neal ; Smith, Edward K. ; Brun, Yuriy ; Devanbu, Premkumar ; Forrest, Stephanie ; Weimer, Westley</creator><creatorcontrib>Le Goues, Claire ; Holtschulte, Neal ; Smith, Edward K. ; Brun, Yuriy ; Devanbu, Premkumar ; Forrest, Stephanie ; Weimer, Westley</creatorcontrib><description>The field of automated software repair lacks a set of common benchmark problems. Although benchmark sets are used widely throughout computer science, existing benchmarks are not easily adapted to the problem of automatic defect repair, which has several special requirements. Most important of these is the need for benchmark programs with reproducible, important defects and a deterministic method for assessing if those defects have been repaired. This article details the need for a new set of benchmarks, outlines requirements, and then presents two datasets, ManyBugs and IntroClass, consisting between them of 1,183 defects in 15 C programs. Each dataset is designed to support the comparative evaluation of automatic repair algorithms asking a variety of experimental questions. The datasets have empirically defined guarantees of reproducibility and benchmark quality, and each study object is categorized to facilitate qualitative evaluation and comparisons by category of bug or program. The article presents baseline experimental results on both datasets for three existing repair methods, GenProg, AE, and TrpAutoRepair, to reduce the burden on researchers who adopt these datasets for their own comparative evaluations.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0098-5589</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1939-3520</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1109/TSE.2015.2454513</identifier><identifier>CODEN: IESEDJ</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: IEEE</publisher><subject><sc xmlns:ali="http://www.niso.org/schemas/ali/1.0/" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance">IntroClass ; <sc xmlns:ali="http://www.niso.org/schemas/ali/1.0/" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance">ManyBugs ; Algorithms ; Automated program repair ; Automation ; benchmark ; Benchmark testing ; Benchmarks ; C (programming language) ; C language ; Categories ; Computer bugs ; Computer programs ; Computer science ; Datasets ; Debugging ; Defects ; Electronic mail ; Maintenance engineering ; Repair ; Reproducibility ; Software ; Software systems ; Studies ; subject defect</subject><ispartof>IEEE transactions on software engineering, 2015-12, Vol.41 (12), p.1236-1256</ispartof><rights>Copyright IEEE Computer Society Dec 1, 2015</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c432t-a70fccb2cd828a9f82a10674ddde24668e7be2592f1b7cdfe3091ceb46f9a8153</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c432t-a70fccb2cd828a9f82a10674ddde24668e7be2592f1b7cdfe3091ceb46f9a8153</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/7153570$$EHTML$$P50$$Gieee$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,792,27901,27902,54733</link.rule.ids><linktorsrc>$$Uhttps://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/7153570$$EView_record_in_IEEE$$FView_record_in_$$GIEEE</linktorsrc></links><search><creatorcontrib>Le Goues, Claire</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Holtschulte, Neal</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Smith, Edward K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brun, Yuriy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Devanbu, Premkumar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Forrest, Stephanie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Weimer, Westley</creatorcontrib><title>The ManyBugs and IntroClass Benchmarks for Automated Repair of C Programs</title><title>IEEE transactions on software engineering</title><addtitle>TSE</addtitle><description>The field of automated software repair lacks a set of common benchmark problems. Although benchmark sets are used widely throughout computer science, existing benchmarks are not easily adapted to the problem of automatic defect repair, which has several special requirements. Most important of these is the need for benchmark programs with reproducible, important defects and a deterministic method for assessing if those defects have been repaired. This article details the need for a new set of benchmarks, outlines requirements, and then presents two datasets, ManyBugs and IntroClass, consisting between them of 1,183 defects in 15 C programs. Each dataset is designed to support the comparative evaluation of automatic repair algorithms asking a variety of experimental questions. The datasets have empirically defined guarantees of reproducibility and benchmark quality, and each study object is categorized to facilitate qualitative evaluation and comparisons by category of bug or program. The article presents baseline experimental results on both datasets for three existing repair methods, GenProg, AE, and TrpAutoRepair, to reduce the burden on researchers who adopt these datasets for their own comparative evaluations.</description><subject><sc xmlns:ali="http://www.niso.org/schemas/ali/1.0/" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance">IntroClass</subject><subject><sc xmlns:ali="http://www.niso.org/schemas/ali/1.0/" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance">ManyBugs</subject><subject>Algorithms</subject><subject>Automated program repair</subject><subject>Automation</subject><subject>benchmark</subject><subject>Benchmark testing</subject><subject>Benchmarks</subject><subject>C (programming language)</subject><subject>C language</subject><subject>Categories</subject><subject>Computer bugs</subject><subject>Computer programs</subject><subject>Computer science</subject><subject>Datasets</subject><subject>Debugging</subject><subject>Defects</subject><subject>Electronic mail</subject><subject>Maintenance engineering</subject><subject>Repair</subject><subject>Reproducibility</subject><subject>Software</subject><subject>Software systems</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>subject defect</subject><issn>0098-5589</issn><issn>1939-3520</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>RIE</sourceid><recordid>eNpdkLFOwzAURS0EEqWwI7FYYmFJsZ04tsc2KlCpCARljhznuU1J4mInQ_-eVK0YmN5y7tV9B6FbSiaUEvW4-pxPGKF8whKecBqfoRFVsYpizsg5GhGiZMS5VJfoKoQtIYQLwUdosdoAftXtftavA9ZtiRdt511W6xDwDFqzabT_Dtg6j6d95xrdQYk_YKcrj53FGX73bu11E67RhdV1gJvTHaOvp_kqe4mWb8-LbLqMTBKzLtKCWGMKZkrJpFZWMk1JKpKyLIElaSpBFMC4YpYWwpQWYqKogSJJrdKS8niMHo69O-9-eghd3lTBQF3rFlwfcipkyihhTA7o_T9063rfDusGKqWUMpbGA0WOlPEuBA823_lq-HqfU5If3OaD2_zgNj-5HSJ3x0gFAH-4GNZxQeJfYchz2g</recordid><startdate>20151201</startdate><enddate>20151201</enddate><creator>Le Goues, Claire</creator><creator>Holtschulte, Neal</creator><creator>Smith, Edward K.</creator><creator>Brun, Yuriy</creator><creator>Devanbu, Premkumar</creator><creator>Forrest, Stephanie</creator><creator>Weimer, Westley</creator><general>IEEE</general><general>IEEE Computer Society</general><scope>97E</scope><scope>RIA</scope><scope>RIE</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>7SC</scope><scope>7SP</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>F28</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>L~C</scope><scope>L~D</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20151201</creationdate><title>The ManyBugs and IntroClass Benchmarks for Automated Repair of C Programs</title><author>Le Goues, Claire ; Holtschulte, Neal ; Smith, Edward K. ; Brun, Yuriy ; Devanbu, Premkumar ; Forrest, Stephanie ; Weimer, Westley</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c432t-a70fccb2cd828a9f82a10674ddde24668e7be2592f1b7cdfe3091ceb46f9a8153</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic><sc xmlns:ali="http://www.niso.org/schemas/ali/1.0/" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance">IntroClass</topic><topic><sc xmlns:ali="http://www.niso.org/schemas/ali/1.0/" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance">ManyBugs</topic><topic>Algorithms</topic><topic>Automated program repair</topic><topic>Automation</topic><topic>benchmark</topic><topic>Benchmark testing</topic><topic>Benchmarks</topic><topic>C (programming language)</topic><topic>C language</topic><topic>Categories</topic><topic>Computer bugs</topic><topic>Computer programs</topic><topic>Computer science</topic><topic>Datasets</topic><topic>Debugging</topic><topic>Defects</topic><topic>Electronic mail</topic><topic>Maintenance engineering</topic><topic>Repair</topic><topic>Reproducibility</topic><topic>Software</topic><topic>Software systems</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>subject defect</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Le Goues, Claire</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Holtschulte, Neal</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Smith, Edward K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brun, Yuriy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Devanbu, Premkumar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Forrest, Stephanie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Weimer, Westley</creatorcontrib><collection>IEEE All-Society Periodicals Package (ASPP) 2005-present</collection><collection>IEEE All-Society Periodicals Package (ASPP) 1998-Present</collection><collection>IEEE Electronic Library (IEL)</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts</collection><collection>Electronics & Communications Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ANTE: Abstracts in New Technology & Engineering</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Academic</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Professional</collection><jtitle>IEEE transactions on software engineering</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext_linktorsrc</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Le Goues, Claire</au><au>Holtschulte, Neal</au><au>Smith, Edward K.</au><au>Brun, Yuriy</au><au>Devanbu, Premkumar</au><au>Forrest, Stephanie</au><au>Weimer, Westley</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The ManyBugs and IntroClass Benchmarks for Automated Repair of C Programs</atitle><jtitle>IEEE transactions on software engineering</jtitle><stitle>TSE</stitle><date>2015-12-01</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>41</volume><issue>12</issue><spage>1236</spage><epage>1256</epage><pages>1236-1256</pages><issn>0098-5589</issn><eissn>1939-3520</eissn><coden>IESEDJ</coden><abstract>The field of automated software repair lacks a set of common benchmark problems. Although benchmark sets are used widely throughout computer science, existing benchmarks are not easily adapted to the problem of automatic defect repair, which has several special requirements. Most important of these is the need for benchmark programs with reproducible, important defects and a deterministic method for assessing if those defects have been repaired. This article details the need for a new set of benchmarks, outlines requirements, and then presents two datasets, ManyBugs and IntroClass, consisting between them of 1,183 defects in 15 C programs. Each dataset is designed to support the comparative evaluation of automatic repair algorithms asking a variety of experimental questions. The datasets have empirically defined guarantees of reproducibility and benchmark quality, and each study object is categorized to facilitate qualitative evaluation and comparisons by category of bug or program. The article presents baseline experimental results on both datasets for three existing repair methods, GenProg, AE, and TrpAutoRepair, to reduce the burden on researchers who adopt these datasets for their own comparative evaluations.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>IEEE</pub><doi>10.1109/TSE.2015.2454513</doi><tpages>21</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext_linktorsrc |
identifier | ISSN: 0098-5589 |
ispartof | IEEE transactions on software engineering, 2015-12, Vol.41 (12), p.1236-1256 |
issn | 0098-5589 1939-3520 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1786210228 |
source | IEEE Electronic Library (IEL) |
subjects | <sc xmlns:ali="http://www.niso.org/schemas/ali/1.0/" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance">IntroClass <sc xmlns:ali="http://www.niso.org/schemas/ali/1.0/" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance">ManyBugs Algorithms Automated program repair Automation benchmark Benchmark testing Benchmarks C (programming language) C language Categories Computer bugs Computer programs Computer science Datasets Debugging Defects Electronic mail Maintenance engineering Repair Reproducibility Software Software systems Studies subject defect |
title | The ManyBugs and IntroClass Benchmarks for Automated Repair of C Programs |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-05T17%3A38%3A43IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_RIE&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20ManyBugs%20and%20IntroClass%20Benchmarks%20for%20Automated%20Repair%20of%20C%20Programs&rft.jtitle=IEEE%20transactions%20on%20software%20engineering&rft.au=Le%20Goues,%20Claire&rft.date=2015-12-01&rft.volume=41&rft.issue=12&rft.spage=1236&rft.epage=1256&rft.pages=1236-1256&rft.issn=0098-5589&rft.eissn=1939-3520&rft.coden=IESEDJ&rft_id=info:doi/10.1109/TSE.2015.2454513&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_RIE%3E3936541631%3C/proquest_RIE%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1761112263&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ieee_id=7153570&rfr_iscdi=true |