Impact of topographic internal lee wave drag on an eddying global ocean model

•Large changes in the abyss, small changes near the surface with wave drag.•Deflection by topographic blocking can lead to increases in abyssal kinetic energy.•Adding wave drag does not go to the detriment of model performance.•Momentum flux should be distributed heterogeneously throughout water col...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Ocean modelling (Oxford) 2016-01, Vol.97, p.109-128
Hauptverfasser: Trossman, David S., Arbic, Brian K., Richman, James G., Garner, Stephen T., Jayne, Steven R., Wallcraft, Alan J.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 128
container_issue
container_start_page 109
container_title Ocean modelling (Oxford)
container_volume 97
creator Trossman, David S.
Arbic, Brian K.
Richman, James G.
Garner, Stephen T.
Jayne, Steven R.
Wallcraft, Alan J.
description •Large changes in the abyss, small changes near the surface with wave drag.•Deflection by topographic blocking can lead to increases in abyssal kinetic energy.•Adding wave drag does not go to the detriment of model performance.•Momentum flux should be distributed heterogeneously throughout water column. The impact of topographic internal lee wave drag (wave drag hereafter) on several aspects of the low-frequency circulation in a high-resolution global ocean model forced by winds and air-sea buoyancy fluxes is examined here. The HYbrid Coordinate Ocean Model (HYCOM) is run at two different horizontal resolutions (one nominally 1/12° and the other 1/25°). Wave drag, which parameterizes both topographic blocking and the generation of lee waves arising from geostrophic flow impinging upon rough topography, is inserted into the simulations as they run. The parameterization used here affects the momentum equations and hence the structure of eddy kinetic energy. Lee waves also have implications for diapycnal mixing in the ocean, though the parameterization does not directly modify the density. Total near-bottom energy dissipation due to wave drag and quadratic bottom boundary layer drag is nearly doubled, and the energy dissipation due to quadratic bottom drag is reduced by about a factor of two, in simulations with an inserted wave drag compared to simulations having only quadratic bottom drag. With the insertion of wave drag, the kinetic energy is reduced in the abyss and in a three-dimensional global integral. Deflection by partial topographic blocking is inferred to be one reason why the near-bottom kinetic energy can increase in locations where there is little change in dissipation by quadratic bottom drag. Despite large changes seen in the abyss, the changes that occur near the sea surface are relatively small upon insertion of wave drag into the simulations. Both the sea surface height variance and geostrophic surface kinetic energy are reduced on global average by more than twice the seasonal variability in these diagnostics. Alterations in the intensified jet positions brought about by inserting wave drag are not distinguishable from the temporal variability of jet positions. Various statistical measures suggest that applying wave drag only within a fixed distance from the seafloor is not detrimental to the model performance relative to observations. However, the introduction of a novel diagnostic suggests that one way to improve the wave drag parameteri
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.ocemod.2015.10.013
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1786202712</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S1463500315002164</els_id><sourcerecordid>1786202712</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c484t-7e1933d10a544adf328fbbef95f29748caa6582e1cfdcf83b40fb9a9892c7f563</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNUMlOwzAQtRBIlMIfcPCRS4KXrBckVLFUKuICZ8uxx8FVEgc7Lerf4yqII-I0o6e3zDyErilJKaHF7TZ1CnqnU0ZoHqGUUH6CFjQreJITSk9_d8LP0UUIW0JoSXm-QC_rfpRqws7gyY2u9XL8sArbYQI_yA53APhL7gFrL1vsBiwHDFof7NDitnNNpMTsCMZ46C7RmZFdgKufuUTvjw9vq-dk8_q0Xt1vEpVV2ZSUQGvONSUyzzKpDWeVaRowdW5YXWaVkrLIKwZUGa1MxZuMmKaWdVUzVZq84Et0M_uO3n3uIEyit0FB18kB3C4IWlYFI6yk7B_UgvEinkUiNZupyrsQPBgxettLfxCUiGPRYivmosWx6CMai46yu1kG8eO9BS-CsjAo0NaDmoR29m-Db25TiCA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1762364840</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Impact of topographic internal lee wave drag on an eddying global ocean model</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Trossman, David S. ; Arbic, Brian K. ; Richman, James G. ; Garner, Stephen T. ; Jayne, Steven R. ; Wallcraft, Alan J.</creator><creatorcontrib>Trossman, David S. ; Arbic, Brian K. ; Richman, James G. ; Garner, Stephen T. ; Jayne, Steven R. ; Wallcraft, Alan J.</creatorcontrib><description>•Large changes in the abyss, small changes near the surface with wave drag.•Deflection by topographic blocking can lead to increases in abyssal kinetic energy.•Adding wave drag does not go to the detriment of model performance.•Momentum flux should be distributed heterogeneously throughout water column. The impact of topographic internal lee wave drag (wave drag hereafter) on several aspects of the low-frequency circulation in a high-resolution global ocean model forced by winds and air-sea buoyancy fluxes is examined here. The HYbrid Coordinate Ocean Model (HYCOM) is run at two different horizontal resolutions (one nominally 1/12° and the other 1/25°). Wave drag, which parameterizes both topographic blocking and the generation of lee waves arising from geostrophic flow impinging upon rough topography, is inserted into the simulations as they run. The parameterization used here affects the momentum equations and hence the structure of eddy kinetic energy. Lee waves also have implications for diapycnal mixing in the ocean, though the parameterization does not directly modify the density. Total near-bottom energy dissipation due to wave drag and quadratic bottom boundary layer drag is nearly doubled, and the energy dissipation due to quadratic bottom drag is reduced by about a factor of two, in simulations with an inserted wave drag compared to simulations having only quadratic bottom drag. With the insertion of wave drag, the kinetic energy is reduced in the abyss and in a three-dimensional global integral. Deflection by partial topographic blocking is inferred to be one reason why the near-bottom kinetic energy can increase in locations where there is little change in dissipation by quadratic bottom drag. Despite large changes seen in the abyss, the changes that occur near the sea surface are relatively small upon insertion of wave drag into the simulations. Both the sea surface height variance and geostrophic surface kinetic energy are reduced on global average by more than twice the seasonal variability in these diagnostics. Alterations in the intensified jet positions brought about by inserting wave drag are not distinguishable from the temporal variability of jet positions. Various statistical measures suggest that applying wave drag only within a fixed distance from the seafloor is not detrimental to the model performance relative to observations. However, the introduction of a novel diagnostic suggests that one way to improve the wave drag parameterization is to allow the vertical deposition of lee wave momentum flux to be spatially heterogeneous.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1463-5003</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1463-5011</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.ocemod.2015.10.013</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>AVISO ; Current meters ; Drag ; Internal lee waves ; Kinetic energy ; Lee waves ; Marine ; Mathematical models ; Model evaluation ; Ocean models ; Parameterization ; Parametrization ; Simulation ; Topographic blocking ; Wave drag</subject><ispartof>Ocean modelling (Oxford), 2016-01, Vol.97, p.109-128</ispartof><rights>2015 Elsevier Ltd</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c484t-7e1933d10a544adf328fbbef95f29748caa6582e1cfdcf83b40fb9a9892c7f563</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c484t-7e1933d10a544adf328fbbef95f29748caa6582e1cfdcf83b40fb9a9892c7f563</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1463500315002164$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Trossman, David S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Arbic, Brian K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Richman, James G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Garner, Stephen T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jayne, Steven R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wallcraft, Alan J.</creatorcontrib><title>Impact of topographic internal lee wave drag on an eddying global ocean model</title><title>Ocean modelling (Oxford)</title><description>•Large changes in the abyss, small changes near the surface with wave drag.•Deflection by topographic blocking can lead to increases in abyssal kinetic energy.•Adding wave drag does not go to the detriment of model performance.•Momentum flux should be distributed heterogeneously throughout water column. The impact of topographic internal lee wave drag (wave drag hereafter) on several aspects of the low-frequency circulation in a high-resolution global ocean model forced by winds and air-sea buoyancy fluxes is examined here. The HYbrid Coordinate Ocean Model (HYCOM) is run at two different horizontal resolutions (one nominally 1/12° and the other 1/25°). Wave drag, which parameterizes both topographic blocking and the generation of lee waves arising from geostrophic flow impinging upon rough topography, is inserted into the simulations as they run. The parameterization used here affects the momentum equations and hence the structure of eddy kinetic energy. Lee waves also have implications for diapycnal mixing in the ocean, though the parameterization does not directly modify the density. Total near-bottom energy dissipation due to wave drag and quadratic bottom boundary layer drag is nearly doubled, and the energy dissipation due to quadratic bottom drag is reduced by about a factor of two, in simulations with an inserted wave drag compared to simulations having only quadratic bottom drag. With the insertion of wave drag, the kinetic energy is reduced in the abyss and in a three-dimensional global integral. Deflection by partial topographic blocking is inferred to be one reason why the near-bottom kinetic energy can increase in locations where there is little change in dissipation by quadratic bottom drag. Despite large changes seen in the abyss, the changes that occur near the sea surface are relatively small upon insertion of wave drag into the simulations. Both the sea surface height variance and geostrophic surface kinetic energy are reduced on global average by more than twice the seasonal variability in these diagnostics. Alterations in the intensified jet positions brought about by inserting wave drag are not distinguishable from the temporal variability of jet positions. Various statistical measures suggest that applying wave drag only within a fixed distance from the seafloor is not detrimental to the model performance relative to observations. However, the introduction of a novel diagnostic suggests that one way to improve the wave drag parameterization is to allow the vertical deposition of lee wave momentum flux to be spatially heterogeneous.</description><subject>AVISO</subject><subject>Current meters</subject><subject>Drag</subject><subject>Internal lee waves</subject><subject>Kinetic energy</subject><subject>Lee waves</subject><subject>Marine</subject><subject>Mathematical models</subject><subject>Model evaluation</subject><subject>Ocean models</subject><subject>Parameterization</subject><subject>Parametrization</subject><subject>Simulation</subject><subject>Topographic blocking</subject><subject>Wave drag</subject><issn>1463-5003</issn><issn>1463-5011</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNUMlOwzAQtRBIlMIfcPCRS4KXrBckVLFUKuICZ8uxx8FVEgc7Lerf4yqII-I0o6e3zDyErilJKaHF7TZ1CnqnU0ZoHqGUUH6CFjQreJITSk9_d8LP0UUIW0JoSXm-QC_rfpRqws7gyY2u9XL8sArbYQI_yA53APhL7gFrL1vsBiwHDFof7NDitnNNpMTsCMZ46C7RmZFdgKufuUTvjw9vq-dk8_q0Xt1vEpVV2ZSUQGvONSUyzzKpDWeVaRowdW5YXWaVkrLIKwZUGa1MxZuMmKaWdVUzVZq84Et0M_uO3n3uIEyit0FB18kB3C4IWlYFI6yk7B_UgvEinkUiNZupyrsQPBgxettLfxCUiGPRYivmosWx6CMai46yu1kG8eO9BS-CsjAo0NaDmoR29m-Db25TiCA</recordid><startdate>201601</startdate><enddate>201601</enddate><creator>Trossman, David S.</creator><creator>Arbic, Brian K.</creator><creator>Richman, James G.</creator><creator>Garner, Stephen T.</creator><creator>Jayne, Steven R.</creator><creator>Wallcraft, Alan J.</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7TN</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>7SC</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>L~C</scope><scope>L~D</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201601</creationdate><title>Impact of topographic internal lee wave drag on an eddying global ocean model</title><author>Trossman, David S. ; Arbic, Brian K. ; Richman, James G. ; Garner, Stephen T. ; Jayne, Steven R. ; Wallcraft, Alan J.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c484t-7e1933d10a544adf328fbbef95f29748caa6582e1cfdcf83b40fb9a9892c7f563</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>AVISO</topic><topic>Current meters</topic><topic>Drag</topic><topic>Internal lee waves</topic><topic>Kinetic energy</topic><topic>Lee waves</topic><topic>Marine</topic><topic>Mathematical models</topic><topic>Model evaluation</topic><topic>Ocean models</topic><topic>Parameterization</topic><topic>Parametrization</topic><topic>Simulation</topic><topic>Topographic blocking</topic><topic>Wave drag</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Trossman, David S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Arbic, Brian K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Richman, James G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Garner, Stephen T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jayne, Steven R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wallcraft, Alan J.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Oceanic Abstracts</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy &amp; Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts</collection><collection>Mechanical &amp; Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts – Academic</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Professional</collection><jtitle>Ocean modelling (Oxford)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Trossman, David S.</au><au>Arbic, Brian K.</au><au>Richman, James G.</au><au>Garner, Stephen T.</au><au>Jayne, Steven R.</au><au>Wallcraft, Alan J.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Impact of topographic internal lee wave drag on an eddying global ocean model</atitle><jtitle>Ocean modelling (Oxford)</jtitle><date>2016-01</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>97</volume><spage>109</spage><epage>128</epage><pages>109-128</pages><issn>1463-5003</issn><eissn>1463-5011</eissn><abstract>•Large changes in the abyss, small changes near the surface with wave drag.•Deflection by topographic blocking can lead to increases in abyssal kinetic energy.•Adding wave drag does not go to the detriment of model performance.•Momentum flux should be distributed heterogeneously throughout water column. The impact of topographic internal lee wave drag (wave drag hereafter) on several aspects of the low-frequency circulation in a high-resolution global ocean model forced by winds and air-sea buoyancy fluxes is examined here. The HYbrid Coordinate Ocean Model (HYCOM) is run at two different horizontal resolutions (one nominally 1/12° and the other 1/25°). Wave drag, which parameterizes both topographic blocking and the generation of lee waves arising from geostrophic flow impinging upon rough topography, is inserted into the simulations as they run. The parameterization used here affects the momentum equations and hence the structure of eddy kinetic energy. Lee waves also have implications for diapycnal mixing in the ocean, though the parameterization does not directly modify the density. Total near-bottom energy dissipation due to wave drag and quadratic bottom boundary layer drag is nearly doubled, and the energy dissipation due to quadratic bottom drag is reduced by about a factor of two, in simulations with an inserted wave drag compared to simulations having only quadratic bottom drag. With the insertion of wave drag, the kinetic energy is reduced in the abyss and in a three-dimensional global integral. Deflection by partial topographic blocking is inferred to be one reason why the near-bottom kinetic energy can increase in locations where there is little change in dissipation by quadratic bottom drag. Despite large changes seen in the abyss, the changes that occur near the sea surface are relatively small upon insertion of wave drag into the simulations. Both the sea surface height variance and geostrophic surface kinetic energy are reduced on global average by more than twice the seasonal variability in these diagnostics. Alterations in the intensified jet positions brought about by inserting wave drag are not distinguishable from the temporal variability of jet positions. Various statistical measures suggest that applying wave drag only within a fixed distance from the seafloor is not detrimental to the model performance relative to observations. However, the introduction of a novel diagnostic suggests that one way to improve the wave drag parameterization is to allow the vertical deposition of lee wave momentum flux to be spatially heterogeneous.</abstract><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><doi>10.1016/j.ocemod.2015.10.013</doi><tpages>20</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1463-5003
ispartof Ocean modelling (Oxford), 2016-01, Vol.97, p.109-128
issn 1463-5003
1463-5011
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1786202712
source Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects AVISO
Current meters
Drag
Internal lee waves
Kinetic energy
Lee waves
Marine
Mathematical models
Model evaluation
Ocean models
Parameterization
Parametrization
Simulation
Topographic blocking
Wave drag
title Impact of topographic internal lee wave drag on an eddying global ocean model
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-02T04%3A58%3A17IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Impact%20of%20topographic%20internal%20lee%20wave%20drag%20on%20an%20eddying%20global%20ocean%20model&rft.jtitle=Ocean%20modelling%20(Oxford)&rft.au=Trossman,%20David%20S.&rft.date=2016-01&rft.volume=97&rft.spage=109&rft.epage=128&rft.pages=109-128&rft.issn=1463-5003&rft.eissn=1463-5011&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.ocemod.2015.10.013&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1786202712%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1762364840&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S1463500315002164&rfr_iscdi=true