Identifying contrasting influences and surface water signals for specific groundwater phosphorus vulnerability

Two groundwater dominated catchments with contrasting land use (Grassland and Arable) and soil chemistry were investigated for influences on P transfer below the rooting zone, via the aquifer and into the rivers. The objective was to improve the understanding of hydrochemical process for best manage...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The Science of the total environment 2016-01, Vol.541, p.292-302
Hauptverfasser: Mellander, P.-E., Jordan, P., Shore, M., McDonald, N.T., Wall, D.P., Shortle, G., Daly, K.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 302
container_issue
container_start_page 292
container_title The Science of the total environment
container_volume 541
creator Mellander, P.-E.
Jordan, P.
Shore, M.
McDonald, N.T.
Wall, D.P.
Shortle, G.
Daly, K.
description Two groundwater dominated catchments with contrasting land use (Grassland and Arable) and soil chemistry were investigated for influences on P transfer below the rooting zone, via the aquifer and into the rivers. The objective was to improve the understanding of hydrochemical process for best management practise and determine the importance of P transfer via groundwater pathways. Despite the catchments having similar inorganic P reserves, the iron-rich soils of the Grassland catchment favoured P mobilisation into soluble form and transfer to groundwater. Sites in that catchment had elevated dissolved reactive P concentrations in groundwater (>0.035mgl−1) and the river had flow-weighted mean TRP concentrations almost three times that of the aluminium-rich Arable catchment (0.067mgl−1 compared to 0.023mgl−1). While the average annual TRP flux was low in both catchments (although three times higher in the Grassland catchment; 0.385kgha−1 compared to 0.128kgha−1), 50% and 59% of TRP was lost via groundwater, respectively, during winter periods that were closed for fertiliser application. For policy reviews, slow-flow pathways and associated time-lags between fertiliser application, mobilisation of soil P reserves and delivery to the river should be carefully considered when reviewing mitigating strategies and efficacy of mitigating measures in groundwater fed catchments. For example, while the Grassland catchment indicated a soil-P chemistry susceptibility, the Arable catchment indicated a transient point source control; both resulted in sustained or transient periods of elevated low river-flow P concentrations, respectively. [Display omitted] •P transfer via groundwater to rivers was investigated in two agricultural catchments.•Fe-rich soils favour P mobilisation into soluble form and transfer to groundwater.•P concentrations in near-stream groundwater influence stream P concentrations.•Groundwater contribution to stream TRP flux was 50% and 59% in winter.•Susceptibility of P via groundwater should be considered for mitigation.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2015.09.082
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1786200831</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0048969715307427</els_id><sourcerecordid>1786200831</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c437t-f49ecf04c31ed5c381c57f120673fb5ad85e52a3fc2ec925c783d5ba9698e2e43</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkU1vGyEQhlHVqnHS_oV2j73slo9lgWMU9SNSpFzaM8IwuFhrcIF15X9fVk5zbZAQc3jeGTEPQh8JHggm0-f9UGyoqUI8DRQTPmA1YElfoQ2RQvUE0-k12mA8yl5NSlyh61L2uB0hyVt0RaeRYIHHDYr3DmIN_hzirrMp1mxKXesQ_bxAtFA6E11XluyNhe6PqZC7EnbRzKXzqdVHsMEH2-1yWqK7AMdfqbSbl9KdljlCNtswh3p-h974FoT3T-8N-vn1y4-77_3D47f7u9uH3o5M1N6PCqzHo2UEHLdMEsuFJxRPgvktN05y4NQwbylYRbkVkjm-Ne2vEiiM7AZ9uvQ95vR7gVL1IRQL82wipKVoIuREMZaMvACdKOOKUfUCtIHrYnFDxQW1OZWSwetjDgeTz5pgvSrUe_2sUK8KNVa6KWzJD09Dlu0B3HPun7MG3F4AaAs8Bchro9WUCxls1S6F_w75C-8MtHI</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1735910700</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Identifying contrasting influences and surface water signals for specific groundwater phosphorus vulnerability</title><source>Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)</source><creator>Mellander, P.-E. ; Jordan, P. ; Shore, M. ; McDonald, N.T. ; Wall, D.P. ; Shortle, G. ; Daly, K.</creator><creatorcontrib>Mellander, P.-E. ; Jordan, P. ; Shore, M. ; McDonald, N.T. ; Wall, D.P. ; Shortle, G. ; Daly, K.</creatorcontrib><description>Two groundwater dominated catchments with contrasting land use (Grassland and Arable) and soil chemistry were investigated for influences on P transfer below the rooting zone, via the aquifer and into the rivers. The objective was to improve the understanding of hydrochemical process for best management practise and determine the importance of P transfer via groundwater pathways. Despite the catchments having similar inorganic P reserves, the iron-rich soils of the Grassland catchment favoured P mobilisation into soluble form and transfer to groundwater. Sites in that catchment had elevated dissolved reactive P concentrations in groundwater (&gt;0.035mgl−1) and the river had flow-weighted mean TRP concentrations almost three times that of the aluminium-rich Arable catchment (0.067mgl−1 compared to 0.023mgl−1). While the average annual TRP flux was low in both catchments (although three times higher in the Grassland catchment; 0.385kgha−1 compared to 0.128kgha−1), 50% and 59% of TRP was lost via groundwater, respectively, during winter periods that were closed for fertiliser application. For policy reviews, slow-flow pathways and associated time-lags between fertiliser application, mobilisation of soil P reserves and delivery to the river should be carefully considered when reviewing mitigating strategies and efficacy of mitigating measures in groundwater fed catchments. For example, while the Grassland catchment indicated a soil-P chemistry susceptibility, the Arable catchment indicated a transient point source control; both resulted in sustained or transient periods of elevated low river-flow P concentrations, respectively. [Display omitted] •P transfer via groundwater to rivers was investigated in two agricultural catchments.•Fe-rich soils favour P mobilisation into soluble form and transfer to groundwater.•P concentrations in near-stream groundwater influence stream P concentrations.•Groundwater contribution to stream TRP flux was 50% and 59% in winter.•Susceptibility of P via groundwater should be considered for mitigation.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0048-9697</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-1026</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2015.09.082</identifier><identifier>PMID: 26410704</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Netherlands: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Agriculture ; Arable land ; Catchments ; Eutrophication ; Freshwater ; Grasslands ; Groundwater ; Pathways ; Phosphorus mobilisation ; Phosphorus transfer ; Reserves ; Rivers ; Soil (material) ; Water pollution</subject><ispartof>The Science of the total environment, 2016-01, Vol.541, p.292-302</ispartof><rights>2015 Elsevier B.V.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c437t-f49ecf04c31ed5c381c57f120673fb5ad85e52a3fc2ec925c783d5ba9698e2e43</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c437t-f49ecf04c31ed5c381c57f120673fb5ad85e52a3fc2ec925c783d5ba9698e2e43</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2015.09.082$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26410704$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Mellander, P.-E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jordan, P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shore, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McDonald, N.T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wall, D.P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shortle, G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Daly, K.</creatorcontrib><title>Identifying contrasting influences and surface water signals for specific groundwater phosphorus vulnerability</title><title>The Science of the total environment</title><addtitle>Sci Total Environ</addtitle><description>Two groundwater dominated catchments with contrasting land use (Grassland and Arable) and soil chemistry were investigated for influences on P transfer below the rooting zone, via the aquifer and into the rivers. The objective was to improve the understanding of hydrochemical process for best management practise and determine the importance of P transfer via groundwater pathways. Despite the catchments having similar inorganic P reserves, the iron-rich soils of the Grassland catchment favoured P mobilisation into soluble form and transfer to groundwater. Sites in that catchment had elevated dissolved reactive P concentrations in groundwater (&gt;0.035mgl−1) and the river had flow-weighted mean TRP concentrations almost three times that of the aluminium-rich Arable catchment (0.067mgl−1 compared to 0.023mgl−1). While the average annual TRP flux was low in both catchments (although three times higher in the Grassland catchment; 0.385kgha−1 compared to 0.128kgha−1), 50% and 59% of TRP was lost via groundwater, respectively, during winter periods that were closed for fertiliser application. For policy reviews, slow-flow pathways and associated time-lags between fertiliser application, mobilisation of soil P reserves and delivery to the river should be carefully considered when reviewing mitigating strategies and efficacy of mitigating measures in groundwater fed catchments. For example, while the Grassland catchment indicated a soil-P chemistry susceptibility, the Arable catchment indicated a transient point source control; both resulted in sustained or transient periods of elevated low river-flow P concentrations, respectively. [Display omitted] •P transfer via groundwater to rivers was investigated in two agricultural catchments.•Fe-rich soils favour P mobilisation into soluble form and transfer to groundwater.•P concentrations in near-stream groundwater influence stream P concentrations.•Groundwater contribution to stream TRP flux was 50% and 59% in winter.•Susceptibility of P via groundwater should be considered for mitigation.</description><subject>Agriculture</subject><subject>Arable land</subject><subject>Catchments</subject><subject>Eutrophication</subject><subject>Freshwater</subject><subject>Grasslands</subject><subject>Groundwater</subject><subject>Pathways</subject><subject>Phosphorus mobilisation</subject><subject>Phosphorus transfer</subject><subject>Reserves</subject><subject>Rivers</subject><subject>Soil (material)</subject><subject>Water pollution</subject><issn>0048-9697</issn><issn>1879-1026</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNkU1vGyEQhlHVqnHS_oV2j73slo9lgWMU9SNSpFzaM8IwuFhrcIF15X9fVk5zbZAQc3jeGTEPQh8JHggm0-f9UGyoqUI8DRQTPmA1YElfoQ2RQvUE0-k12mA8yl5NSlyh61L2uB0hyVt0RaeRYIHHDYr3DmIN_hzirrMp1mxKXesQ_bxAtFA6E11XluyNhe6PqZC7EnbRzKXzqdVHsMEH2-1yWqK7AMdfqbSbl9KdljlCNtswh3p-h974FoT3T-8N-vn1y4-77_3D47f7u9uH3o5M1N6PCqzHo2UEHLdMEsuFJxRPgvktN05y4NQwbylYRbkVkjm-Ne2vEiiM7AZ9uvQ95vR7gVL1IRQL82wipKVoIuREMZaMvACdKOOKUfUCtIHrYnFDxQW1OZWSwetjDgeTz5pgvSrUe_2sUK8KNVa6KWzJD09Dlu0B3HPun7MG3F4AaAs8Bchro9WUCxls1S6F_w75C-8MtHI</recordid><startdate>20160115</startdate><enddate>20160115</enddate><creator>Mellander, P.-E.</creator><creator>Jordan, P.</creator><creator>Shore, M.</creator><creator>McDonald, N.T.</creator><creator>Wall, D.P.</creator><creator>Shortle, G.</creator><creator>Daly, K.</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>7QH</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7TV</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>H97</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>KR7</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20160115</creationdate><title>Identifying contrasting influences and surface water signals for specific groundwater phosphorus vulnerability</title><author>Mellander, P.-E. ; Jordan, P. ; Shore, M. ; McDonald, N.T. ; Wall, D.P. ; Shortle, G. ; Daly, K.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c437t-f49ecf04c31ed5c381c57f120673fb5ad85e52a3fc2ec925c783d5ba9698e2e43</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Agriculture</topic><topic>Arable land</topic><topic>Catchments</topic><topic>Eutrophication</topic><topic>Freshwater</topic><topic>Grasslands</topic><topic>Groundwater</topic><topic>Pathways</topic><topic>Phosphorus mobilisation</topic><topic>Phosphorus transfer</topic><topic>Reserves</topic><topic>Rivers</topic><topic>Soil (material)</topic><topic>Water pollution</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Mellander, P.-E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jordan, P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shore, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McDonald, N.T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wall, D.P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shortle, G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Daly, K.</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Aqualine</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Pollution Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 3: Aquatic Pollution &amp; Environmental Quality</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><jtitle>The Science of the total environment</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Mellander, P.-E.</au><au>Jordan, P.</au><au>Shore, M.</au><au>McDonald, N.T.</au><au>Wall, D.P.</au><au>Shortle, G.</au><au>Daly, K.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Identifying contrasting influences and surface water signals for specific groundwater phosphorus vulnerability</atitle><jtitle>The Science of the total environment</jtitle><addtitle>Sci Total Environ</addtitle><date>2016-01-15</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>541</volume><spage>292</spage><epage>302</epage><pages>292-302</pages><issn>0048-9697</issn><eissn>1879-1026</eissn><abstract>Two groundwater dominated catchments with contrasting land use (Grassland and Arable) and soil chemistry were investigated for influences on P transfer below the rooting zone, via the aquifer and into the rivers. The objective was to improve the understanding of hydrochemical process for best management practise and determine the importance of P transfer via groundwater pathways. Despite the catchments having similar inorganic P reserves, the iron-rich soils of the Grassland catchment favoured P mobilisation into soluble form and transfer to groundwater. Sites in that catchment had elevated dissolved reactive P concentrations in groundwater (&gt;0.035mgl−1) and the river had flow-weighted mean TRP concentrations almost three times that of the aluminium-rich Arable catchment (0.067mgl−1 compared to 0.023mgl−1). While the average annual TRP flux was low in both catchments (although three times higher in the Grassland catchment; 0.385kgha−1 compared to 0.128kgha−1), 50% and 59% of TRP was lost via groundwater, respectively, during winter periods that were closed for fertiliser application. For policy reviews, slow-flow pathways and associated time-lags between fertiliser application, mobilisation of soil P reserves and delivery to the river should be carefully considered when reviewing mitigating strategies and efficacy of mitigating measures in groundwater fed catchments. For example, while the Grassland catchment indicated a soil-P chemistry susceptibility, the Arable catchment indicated a transient point source control; both resulted in sustained or transient periods of elevated low river-flow P concentrations, respectively. [Display omitted] •P transfer via groundwater to rivers was investigated in two agricultural catchments.•Fe-rich soils favour P mobilisation into soluble form and transfer to groundwater.•P concentrations in near-stream groundwater influence stream P concentrations.•Groundwater contribution to stream TRP flux was 50% and 59% in winter.•Susceptibility of P via groundwater should be considered for mitigation.</abstract><cop>Netherlands</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><pmid>26410704</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.scitotenv.2015.09.082</doi><tpages>11</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0048-9697
ispartof The Science of the total environment, 2016-01, Vol.541, p.292-302
issn 0048-9697
1879-1026
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1786200831
source Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)
subjects Agriculture
Arable land
Catchments
Eutrophication
Freshwater
Grasslands
Groundwater
Pathways
Phosphorus mobilisation
Phosphorus transfer
Reserves
Rivers
Soil (material)
Water pollution
title Identifying contrasting influences and surface water signals for specific groundwater phosphorus vulnerability
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-25T04%3A22%3A22IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Identifying%20contrasting%20influences%20and%20surface%20water%20signals%20for%20specific%20groundwater%20phosphorus%20vulnerability&rft.jtitle=The%20Science%20of%20the%20total%20environment&rft.au=Mellander,%20P.-E.&rft.date=2016-01-15&rft.volume=541&rft.spage=292&rft.epage=302&rft.pages=292-302&rft.issn=0048-9697&rft.eissn=1879-1026&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2015.09.082&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1786200831%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1735910700&rft_id=info:pmid/26410704&rft_els_id=S0048969715307427&rfr_iscdi=true