Ab initio hybrid DFT calculations of BaTiO3, PbTiO3, SrZrO3 and PbZrO3 (111) surfaces
•Surface energies for AO3-term (111) surfaces are larger than for Ti (Zr)-term surfaces.•A increase of TiO (ZrO) bond covalency near the ABO3 (111) surface relative to the bulk is observed.•The ABO3 (111) surface energy is larger than the earlier calculated (001) surface energy.•Band gap for PbTiO3,...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Applied surface science 2015-12, Vol.358, p.556-562 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 562 |
---|---|
container_issue | |
container_start_page | 556 |
container_title | Applied surface science |
container_volume | 358 |
creator | Eglitis, Roberts I. |
description | •Surface energies for AO3-term (111) surfaces are larger than for Ti (Zr)-term surfaces.•A increase of TiO (ZrO) bond covalency near the ABO3 (111) surface relative to the bulk is observed.•The ABO3 (111) surface energy is larger than the earlier calculated (001) surface energy.•Band gap for PbTiO3, SrZrO3 and PbZrO3 (111) surfaces becomes smaller, but for BaTiO3 (111) larger with respect to the bulk .
The results of ab initio calculations for polar BaTiO3, PbTiO3, SrZrO3 and PbZrO3 (111) surfaces using the CRYSTAL code are presented. By means of the hybrid B3LYP approach, the surface relaxation has been calculated for two possible B (B=Ti or Zr) or AO3 (A=Ba, Pb or Sr) BaTiO3, PbTiO3, SrZrO3 and PbZrO3 (111) surface terminations. According to performed B3LYP calculations, all atoms of the first surface layer, for both terminations, relax inwards. The only exception is a small outward relaxation of the PbO3-terminated PbTiO3 (111) surface upper layer Pb atom. B3LYP calculated surface energies for BaO3, PbO3, SrO3 and PbO3-terminated BaTiO3, PbTiO3, SrZrO3 and PbZrO3 (111) surfaces are considerably larger than the surface energies for Ti (Zr)-terminated (111) surfaces. Performed B3LYP calculations indicate a considerable increase of TiO (ZrO) chemical bond covalency near the BaTiO3, PbTiO3, SrZrO3 and PbZrO3 (111) surface relative to the BaTiO3, PbTiO3, SrZrO3 and PbZrO3 bulk. Calculated band gaps at the Γ-point near the PbTiO3, SrZrO3 and PbZrO3 (111) surfaces are reduced, but near BaTiO3 (111) surfaces increased, with respect to the BaTiO3, PbTiO3, SrZrO3 and PbZrO3 bulk band gap at the Γ-point values. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.apsusc.2015.08.010 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1786198614</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0169433215018073</els_id><sourcerecordid>1786198614</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c335t-5daec3b6f5563ae4bfbf68a037c8c432bd9089799d2e4310f9aa31ed15f3025f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9UF1LwzAUDaLgnP4DH_I4wdbcpunSF2FOp8JggtuLLyHNB2Z07UxaYf_ezPrsw_3g3HMO3IPQNZAUCBR321TuQx9UmhFgKeEpAXKCRsCnNGGM56doFGllklOanaOLELaEQBavI7SZVdg1rnMt_jxU3mn8uFhjJWvV1zKiTcCtxQ9y7Vb0Fr9Vw3z3H35FsWx0hH7XCQDc4NB7K5UJl-jMyjqYq785RpvF03r-kixXz6_z2TJRlLIuYVoaRavCMlZQafLKVrbgktCp4iqnWaVLwstpWerM5BSILaWkYDQwS0kW2xhNBt-9b796Ezqxc0GZupaNafsgYMoLKGPlkZoPVOXbELyxYu_dTvqDACKOKYqtGFIUxxQF4SKmGGX3g8zEN76d8SIoZxpltPNGdUK37n-DHxxdeek</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1786198614</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Ab initio hybrid DFT calculations of BaTiO3, PbTiO3, SrZrO3 and PbZrO3 (111) surfaces</title><source>Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)</source><creator>Eglitis, Roberts I.</creator><creatorcontrib>Eglitis, Roberts I.</creatorcontrib><description>•Surface energies for AO3-term (111) surfaces are larger than for Ti (Zr)-term surfaces.•A increase of TiO (ZrO) bond covalency near the ABO3 (111) surface relative to the bulk is observed.•The ABO3 (111) surface energy is larger than the earlier calculated (001) surface energy.•Band gap for PbTiO3, SrZrO3 and PbZrO3 (111) surfaces becomes smaller, but for BaTiO3 (111) larger with respect to the bulk .
The results of ab initio calculations for polar BaTiO3, PbTiO3, SrZrO3 and PbZrO3 (111) surfaces using the CRYSTAL code are presented. By means of the hybrid B3LYP approach, the surface relaxation has been calculated for two possible B (B=Ti or Zr) or AO3 (A=Ba, Pb or Sr) BaTiO3, PbTiO3, SrZrO3 and PbZrO3 (111) surface terminations. According to performed B3LYP calculations, all atoms of the first surface layer, for both terminations, relax inwards. The only exception is a small outward relaxation of the PbO3-terminated PbTiO3 (111) surface upper layer Pb atom. B3LYP calculated surface energies for BaO3, PbO3, SrO3 and PbO3-terminated BaTiO3, PbTiO3, SrZrO3 and PbZrO3 (111) surfaces are considerably larger than the surface energies for Ti (Zr)-terminated (111) surfaces. Performed B3LYP calculations indicate a considerable increase of TiO (ZrO) chemical bond covalency near the BaTiO3, PbTiO3, SrZrO3 and PbZrO3 (111) surface relative to the BaTiO3, PbTiO3, SrZrO3 and PbZrO3 bulk. Calculated band gaps at the Γ-point near the PbTiO3, SrZrO3 and PbZrO3 (111) surfaces are reduced, but near BaTiO3 (111) surfaces increased, with respect to the BaTiO3, PbTiO3, SrZrO3 and PbZrO3 bulk band gap at the Γ-point values.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0169-4332</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-5584</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2015.08.010</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Ab initio calculations ; B3LYP ; Barium titanates ; BaTiO3 ; Covalence ; Crystals ; Energy gaps (solid state) ; Mathematical analysis ; PbTiO3 ; PbZrO3 ; SrZrO3 ; Strontium zirconates ; Surface energy ; surfaces ; Terminations</subject><ispartof>Applied surface science, 2015-12, Vol.358, p.556-562</ispartof><rights>2015 Elsevier B.V.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c335t-5daec3b6f5563ae4bfbf68a037c8c432bd9089799d2e4310f9aa31ed15f3025f3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c335t-5daec3b6f5563ae4bfbf68a037c8c432bd9089799d2e4310f9aa31ed15f3025f3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2015.08.010$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>315,781,785,3551,27928,27929,45999</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Eglitis, Roberts I.</creatorcontrib><title>Ab initio hybrid DFT calculations of BaTiO3, PbTiO3, SrZrO3 and PbZrO3 (111) surfaces</title><title>Applied surface science</title><description>•Surface energies for AO3-term (111) surfaces are larger than for Ti (Zr)-term surfaces.•A increase of TiO (ZrO) bond covalency near the ABO3 (111) surface relative to the bulk is observed.•The ABO3 (111) surface energy is larger than the earlier calculated (001) surface energy.•Band gap for PbTiO3, SrZrO3 and PbZrO3 (111) surfaces becomes smaller, but for BaTiO3 (111) larger with respect to the bulk .
The results of ab initio calculations for polar BaTiO3, PbTiO3, SrZrO3 and PbZrO3 (111) surfaces using the CRYSTAL code are presented. By means of the hybrid B3LYP approach, the surface relaxation has been calculated for two possible B (B=Ti or Zr) or AO3 (A=Ba, Pb or Sr) BaTiO3, PbTiO3, SrZrO3 and PbZrO3 (111) surface terminations. According to performed B3LYP calculations, all atoms of the first surface layer, for both terminations, relax inwards. The only exception is a small outward relaxation of the PbO3-terminated PbTiO3 (111) surface upper layer Pb atom. B3LYP calculated surface energies for BaO3, PbO3, SrO3 and PbO3-terminated BaTiO3, PbTiO3, SrZrO3 and PbZrO3 (111) surfaces are considerably larger than the surface energies for Ti (Zr)-terminated (111) surfaces. Performed B3LYP calculations indicate a considerable increase of TiO (ZrO) chemical bond covalency near the BaTiO3, PbTiO3, SrZrO3 and PbZrO3 (111) surface relative to the BaTiO3, PbTiO3, SrZrO3 and PbZrO3 bulk. Calculated band gaps at the Γ-point near the PbTiO3, SrZrO3 and PbZrO3 (111) surfaces are reduced, but near BaTiO3 (111) surfaces increased, with respect to the BaTiO3, PbTiO3, SrZrO3 and PbZrO3 bulk band gap at the Γ-point values.</description><subject>Ab initio calculations</subject><subject>B3LYP</subject><subject>Barium titanates</subject><subject>BaTiO3</subject><subject>Covalence</subject><subject>Crystals</subject><subject>Energy gaps (solid state)</subject><subject>Mathematical analysis</subject><subject>PbTiO3</subject><subject>PbZrO3</subject><subject>SrZrO3</subject><subject>Strontium zirconates</subject><subject>Surface energy</subject><subject>surfaces</subject><subject>Terminations</subject><issn>0169-4332</issn><issn>1873-5584</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9UF1LwzAUDaLgnP4DH_I4wdbcpunSF2FOp8JggtuLLyHNB2Z07UxaYf_ezPrsw_3g3HMO3IPQNZAUCBR321TuQx9UmhFgKeEpAXKCRsCnNGGM56doFGllklOanaOLELaEQBavI7SZVdg1rnMt_jxU3mn8uFhjJWvV1zKiTcCtxQ9y7Vb0Fr9Vw3z3H35FsWx0hH7XCQDc4NB7K5UJl-jMyjqYq785RpvF03r-kixXz6_z2TJRlLIuYVoaRavCMlZQafLKVrbgktCp4iqnWaVLwstpWerM5BSILaWkYDQwS0kW2xhNBt-9b796Ezqxc0GZupaNafsgYMoLKGPlkZoPVOXbELyxYu_dTvqDACKOKYqtGFIUxxQF4SKmGGX3g8zEN76d8SIoZxpltPNGdUK37n-DHxxdeek</recordid><startdate>20151201</startdate><enddate>20151201</enddate><creator>Eglitis, Roberts I.</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SR</scope><scope>7U5</scope><scope>8BQ</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>JG9</scope><scope>L7M</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20151201</creationdate><title>Ab initio hybrid DFT calculations of BaTiO3, PbTiO3, SrZrO3 and PbZrO3 (111) surfaces</title><author>Eglitis, Roberts I.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c335t-5daec3b6f5563ae4bfbf68a037c8c432bd9089799d2e4310f9aa31ed15f3025f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Ab initio calculations</topic><topic>B3LYP</topic><topic>Barium titanates</topic><topic>BaTiO3</topic><topic>Covalence</topic><topic>Crystals</topic><topic>Energy gaps (solid state)</topic><topic>Mathematical analysis</topic><topic>PbTiO3</topic><topic>PbZrO3</topic><topic>SrZrO3</topic><topic>Strontium zirconates</topic><topic>Surface energy</topic><topic>surfaces</topic><topic>Terminations</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Eglitis, Roberts I.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Engineered Materials Abstracts</collection><collection>Solid State and Superconductivity Abstracts</collection><collection>METADEX</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><jtitle>Applied surface science</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Eglitis, Roberts I.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Ab initio hybrid DFT calculations of BaTiO3, PbTiO3, SrZrO3 and PbZrO3 (111) surfaces</atitle><jtitle>Applied surface science</jtitle><date>2015-12-01</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>358</volume><spage>556</spage><epage>562</epage><pages>556-562</pages><issn>0169-4332</issn><eissn>1873-5584</eissn><abstract>•Surface energies for AO3-term (111) surfaces are larger than for Ti (Zr)-term surfaces.•A increase of TiO (ZrO) bond covalency near the ABO3 (111) surface relative to the bulk is observed.•The ABO3 (111) surface energy is larger than the earlier calculated (001) surface energy.•Band gap for PbTiO3, SrZrO3 and PbZrO3 (111) surfaces becomes smaller, but for BaTiO3 (111) larger with respect to the bulk .
The results of ab initio calculations for polar BaTiO3, PbTiO3, SrZrO3 and PbZrO3 (111) surfaces using the CRYSTAL code are presented. By means of the hybrid B3LYP approach, the surface relaxation has been calculated for two possible B (B=Ti or Zr) or AO3 (A=Ba, Pb or Sr) BaTiO3, PbTiO3, SrZrO3 and PbZrO3 (111) surface terminations. According to performed B3LYP calculations, all atoms of the first surface layer, for both terminations, relax inwards. The only exception is a small outward relaxation of the PbO3-terminated PbTiO3 (111) surface upper layer Pb atom. B3LYP calculated surface energies for BaO3, PbO3, SrO3 and PbO3-terminated BaTiO3, PbTiO3, SrZrO3 and PbZrO3 (111) surfaces are considerably larger than the surface energies for Ti (Zr)-terminated (111) surfaces. Performed B3LYP calculations indicate a considerable increase of TiO (ZrO) chemical bond covalency near the BaTiO3, PbTiO3, SrZrO3 and PbZrO3 (111) surface relative to the BaTiO3, PbTiO3, SrZrO3 and PbZrO3 bulk. Calculated band gaps at the Γ-point near the PbTiO3, SrZrO3 and PbZrO3 (111) surfaces are reduced, but near BaTiO3 (111) surfaces increased, with respect to the BaTiO3, PbTiO3, SrZrO3 and PbZrO3 bulk band gap at the Γ-point values.</abstract><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><doi>10.1016/j.apsusc.2015.08.010</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0169-4332 |
ispartof | Applied surface science, 2015-12, Vol.358, p.556-562 |
issn | 0169-4332 1873-5584 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1786198614 |
source | Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier) |
subjects | Ab initio calculations B3LYP Barium titanates BaTiO3 Covalence Crystals Energy gaps (solid state) Mathematical analysis PbTiO3 PbZrO3 SrZrO3 Strontium zirconates Surface energy surfaces Terminations |
title | Ab initio hybrid DFT calculations of BaTiO3, PbTiO3, SrZrO3 and PbZrO3 (111) surfaces |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-17T10%3A54%3A47IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Ab%20initio%20hybrid%20DFT%20calculations%20of%20BaTiO3,%20PbTiO3,%20SrZrO3%20and%20PbZrO3%20(111)%20surfaces&rft.jtitle=Applied%20surface%20science&rft.au=Eglitis,%20Roberts%20I.&rft.date=2015-12-01&rft.volume=358&rft.spage=556&rft.epage=562&rft.pages=556-562&rft.issn=0169-4332&rft.eissn=1873-5584&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.apsusc.2015.08.010&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1786198614%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1786198614&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0169433215018073&rfr_iscdi=true |