Longshore Sediment Transport—Field Data and Estimations Using Neural Networks, Numerical Model, and Empirical Models
Ari Güner, H.A.; Yüksel, Y., and Ç evik, E.Ö., 2013. Longshore sediment transport—field data and estimations using neural networks, numerical model, and empirical models. This work suggests an alternative approach, namely, the use of an artificial neural network (ANN), for the estimation of longshor...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of coastal research 2013-03, Vol.29 (2), p.311-324 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 324 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 311 |
container_title | Journal of coastal research |
container_volume | 29 |
creator | Guener, HAAri Yueksel, Y Cevik, EOezkan |
description | Ari Güner, H.A.; Yüksel, Y., and Ç evik, E.Ö., 2013. Longshore sediment transport—field data and estimations using neural networks, numerical model, and empirical models. This work suggests an alternative approach, namely, the use of an artificial neural network (ANN), for the estimation of longshore sediment transport (LST). The ANN technique provides a powerful utility for input–output mapping if there is sufficient data and can be useful for modeling processes about which adequate knowledge of physics is limited, such as sediment transport. A feed-forward network was developed to predict the LST from a variety of causative variables. The best network was selected after testing many alternatives. The network was validated by experimental and field data. In addition, the ANN method was applied to the case study area (Karaburun, Turkey), located on the SW coast of the Black Sea. The accuracy of the ANN predictions was evaluated against the measured LST rate at Karaburun and compared with two well-known empirical formulas (CERC formula, Kamphuis formula), and a numerical model (LITPACK). The average, net, annual LST rate for the study area was determined based on the morphological volume differences between the surveys. The volume differences were obtained from the accretion at the secondary breakwater of the harbor located at the western end of the 4-km sandy beach. The harbor acted as a total trap, and the beach surveys were extended to an adequate depth. The measured net LST rate was 72,000 m3/y, and the calculated rates were 370,000, 77,000, 83,000, 85,000, and 80,000 m3/y based on the CERC formula (Ksig = 0.39), the modified CERC formula (Ksig = 0.08), the Kamphuis formula, the LITPACK computer program, and the ANN. All methods employed in this study estimated the LST rates well, except the CERC formula. The CERC formula overestimated the LST rate by a factor of five; nevertheless, with the adjustment of the empirical Ksig value (0.39) to 0.08, the fit to the observed data improved significantly. The Kamphuis formula produced results similar to those predicted by the field data. This confirms the use of the Kamphuis formula in conditions of low-wave energy with breaker heights of less than 1 m, which correspond to the study area's wave condition. |
doi_str_mv | 10.2112/JCOASTRES-D-11-00074.1 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1786195275</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>23353629</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>23353629</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-b416t-239442d8618f9ea8db71c4dcf9beb2c9898c4419180c9a18673940e6f470c0413</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkcFu1DAURS0EEkPhE0CR2LBoip_jOPaympkW0NBKzHRtOY5TPCT2YDsgdv0IvpAvwUNQhdjA6kn3nXvl54vQC8BnBIC8fre8Pt_uPqy35aoEKDHGDT2DB2gBdQ1ljSv2EC2yJkpMMH-MnsS4xxgYp80Cfdl4dxs_-mCKrensaFwqdkG5ePAh_bj7fmHN0BUrlVShXFesY7KjSta7WNxE626LKzMFNeSRvvrwKZ4WV9NogtVZe-87M5zOvvFg_xDjU_SoV0M0z37PE3Rzsd4t35Sb68u3y_NN2VJgqSSVoJR0nAHvhVG8axvQtNO9aE1LtOCCa0pBAMdaKOCsyQZsWE8brDGF6gS9mnMPwX-eTExytFGbYVDO-ClKaHK2qElT_xutSEVqIRjO6Mu_0L2fgsuHZIoyVgOGI8VmSgcfYzC9PIT8eeGbBCyPzcn75uRKAshfzcnjo5_Pxn1MPty7SFXVFSMi7-m8b633zvxv7E8o8qcJ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1346651010</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Longshore Sediment Transport—Field Data and Estimations Using Neural Networks, Numerical Model, and Empirical Models</title><source>JSTOR</source><creator>Guener, HAAri ; Yueksel, Y ; Cevik, EOezkan</creator><creatorcontrib>Guener, HAAri ; Yueksel, Y ; Cevik, EOezkan</creatorcontrib><description>Ari Güner, H.A.; Yüksel, Y., and Ç evik, E.Ö., 2013. Longshore sediment transport—field data and estimations using neural networks, numerical model, and empirical models. This work suggests an alternative approach, namely, the use of an artificial neural network (ANN), for the estimation of longshore sediment transport (LST). The ANN technique provides a powerful utility for input–output mapping if there is sufficient data and can be useful for modeling processes about which adequate knowledge of physics is limited, such as sediment transport. A feed-forward network was developed to predict the LST from a variety of causative variables. The best network was selected after testing many alternatives. The network was validated by experimental and field data. In addition, the ANN method was applied to the case study area (Karaburun, Turkey), located on the SW coast of the Black Sea. The accuracy of the ANN predictions was evaluated against the measured LST rate at Karaburun and compared with two well-known empirical formulas (CERC formula, Kamphuis formula), and a numerical model (LITPACK). The average, net, annual LST rate for the study area was determined based on the morphological volume differences between the surveys. The volume differences were obtained from the accretion at the secondary breakwater of the harbor located at the western end of the 4-km sandy beach. The harbor acted as a total trap, and the beach surveys were extended to an adequate depth. The measured net LST rate was 72,000 m3/y, and the calculated rates were 370,000, 77,000, 83,000, 85,000, and 80,000 m3/y based on the CERC formula (Ksig = 0.39), the modified CERC formula (Ksig = 0.08), the Kamphuis formula, the LITPACK computer program, and the ANN. All methods employed in this study estimated the LST rates well, except the CERC formula. The CERC formula overestimated the LST rate by a factor of five; nevertheless, with the adjustment of the empirical Ksig value (0.39) to 0.08, the fit to the observed data improved significantly. The Kamphuis formula produced results similar to those predicted by the field data. This confirms the use of the Kamphuis formula in conditions of low-wave energy with breaker heights of less than 1 m, which correspond to the study area's wave condition.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0749-0208</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1551-5036</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.2112/JCOASTRES-D-11-00074.1</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>1656 Cypress Row Drive, West Palm Beach, FL 33411, USA: The Coastal Education and Research Foundation</publisher><subject>Accretion ; artificial neural network ; Beaches ; Black Sea ; Breakwaters ; CERC formula ; Coastal ; Coastal engineering ; Coasts ; Empirical analysis ; field measurement ; Global positioning systems ; GPS ; Harbors ; Kamphuis formula ; Karaburun ; LITPACK ; Littoral transport ; Long-term mean transport rate ; Longshore sediment transport ; Mathematical models ; Modeling ; Neural networks ; Neurons ; Parametric models ; RESEARCH PAPERS ; Sediment transport ; Sediments ; Sensitivity analysis ; Shorelines ; Studies ; Wave energy</subject><ispartof>Journal of coastal research, 2013-03, Vol.29 (2), p.311-324</ispartof><rights>2012, the Coastal Education & Research Foundation (CERF)</rights><rights>2013 The Coastal Education & Research Foundation [CERF]</rights><rights>Copyright Allen Press Publishing Services Mar 2013</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-b416t-239442d8618f9ea8db71c4dcf9beb2c9898c4419180c9a18673940e6f470c0413</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-b416t-239442d8618f9ea8db71c4dcf9beb2c9898c4419180c9a18673940e6f470c0413</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/23353629$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/23353629$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,803,27915,27916,58008,58241</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Guener, HAAri</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yueksel, Y</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cevik, EOezkan</creatorcontrib><title>Longshore Sediment Transport—Field Data and Estimations Using Neural Networks, Numerical Model, and Empirical Models</title><title>Journal of coastal research</title><description>Ari Güner, H.A.; Yüksel, Y., and Ç evik, E.Ö., 2013. Longshore sediment transport—field data and estimations using neural networks, numerical model, and empirical models. This work suggests an alternative approach, namely, the use of an artificial neural network (ANN), for the estimation of longshore sediment transport (LST). The ANN technique provides a powerful utility for input–output mapping if there is sufficient data and can be useful for modeling processes about which adequate knowledge of physics is limited, such as sediment transport. A feed-forward network was developed to predict the LST from a variety of causative variables. The best network was selected after testing many alternatives. The network was validated by experimental and field data. In addition, the ANN method was applied to the case study area (Karaburun, Turkey), located on the SW coast of the Black Sea. The accuracy of the ANN predictions was evaluated against the measured LST rate at Karaburun and compared with two well-known empirical formulas (CERC formula, Kamphuis formula), and a numerical model (LITPACK). The average, net, annual LST rate for the study area was determined based on the morphological volume differences between the surveys. The volume differences were obtained from the accretion at the secondary breakwater of the harbor located at the western end of the 4-km sandy beach. The harbor acted as a total trap, and the beach surveys were extended to an adequate depth. The measured net LST rate was 72,000 m3/y, and the calculated rates were 370,000, 77,000, 83,000, 85,000, and 80,000 m3/y based on the CERC formula (Ksig = 0.39), the modified CERC formula (Ksig = 0.08), the Kamphuis formula, the LITPACK computer program, and the ANN. All methods employed in this study estimated the LST rates well, except the CERC formula. The CERC formula overestimated the LST rate by a factor of five; nevertheless, with the adjustment of the empirical Ksig value (0.39) to 0.08, the fit to the observed data improved significantly. The Kamphuis formula produced results similar to those predicted by the field data. This confirms the use of the Kamphuis formula in conditions of low-wave energy with breaker heights of less than 1 m, which correspond to the study area's wave condition.</description><subject>Accretion</subject><subject>artificial neural network</subject><subject>Beaches</subject><subject>Black Sea</subject><subject>Breakwaters</subject><subject>CERC formula</subject><subject>Coastal</subject><subject>Coastal engineering</subject><subject>Coasts</subject><subject>Empirical analysis</subject><subject>field measurement</subject><subject>Global positioning systems</subject><subject>GPS</subject><subject>Harbors</subject><subject>Kamphuis formula</subject><subject>Karaburun</subject><subject>LITPACK</subject><subject>Littoral transport</subject><subject>Long-term mean transport rate</subject><subject>Longshore sediment transport</subject><subject>Mathematical models</subject><subject>Modeling</subject><subject>Neural networks</subject><subject>Neurons</subject><subject>Parametric models</subject><subject>RESEARCH PAPERS</subject><subject>Sediment transport</subject><subject>Sediments</subject><subject>Sensitivity analysis</subject><subject>Shorelines</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Wave energy</subject><issn>0749-0208</issn><issn>1551-5036</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkcFu1DAURS0EEkPhE0CR2LBoip_jOPaympkW0NBKzHRtOY5TPCT2YDsgdv0IvpAvwUNQhdjA6kn3nXvl54vQC8BnBIC8fre8Pt_uPqy35aoEKDHGDT2DB2gBdQ1ljSv2EC2yJkpMMH-MnsS4xxgYp80Cfdl4dxs_-mCKrensaFwqdkG5ePAh_bj7fmHN0BUrlVShXFesY7KjSta7WNxE626LKzMFNeSRvvrwKZ4WV9NogtVZe-87M5zOvvFg_xDjU_SoV0M0z37PE3Rzsd4t35Sb68u3y_NN2VJgqSSVoJR0nAHvhVG8axvQtNO9aE1LtOCCa0pBAMdaKOCsyQZsWE8brDGF6gS9mnMPwX-eTExytFGbYVDO-ClKaHK2qElT_xutSEVqIRjO6Mu_0L2fgsuHZIoyVgOGI8VmSgcfYzC9PIT8eeGbBCyPzcn75uRKAshfzcnjo5_Pxn1MPty7SFXVFSMi7-m8b633zvxv7E8o8qcJ</recordid><startdate>20130301</startdate><enddate>20130301</enddate><creator>Guener, HAAri</creator><creator>Yueksel, Y</creator><creator>Cevik, EOezkan</creator><general>The Coastal Education and Research Foundation</general><general>Coastal Education & Research Foundation (CERF)</general><general>Allen Press Inc</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QF</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7QQ</scope><scope>7SC</scope><scope>7SE</scope><scope>7SP</scope><scope>7SR</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7TA</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>7TN</scope><scope>7U5</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8BQ</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BKSAR</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>F28</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>H8G</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>JG9</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>L~C</scope><scope>L~D</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PCBAR</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7UA</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20130301</creationdate><title>Longshore Sediment Transport—Field Data and Estimations Using Neural Networks, Numerical Model, and Empirical Models</title><author>Guener, HAAri ; Yueksel, Y ; Cevik, EOezkan</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b416t-239442d8618f9ea8db71c4dcf9beb2c9898c4419180c9a18673940e6f470c0413</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>Accretion</topic><topic>artificial neural network</topic><topic>Beaches</topic><topic>Black Sea</topic><topic>Breakwaters</topic><topic>CERC formula</topic><topic>Coastal</topic><topic>Coastal engineering</topic><topic>Coasts</topic><topic>Empirical analysis</topic><topic>field measurement</topic><topic>Global positioning systems</topic><topic>GPS</topic><topic>Harbors</topic><topic>Kamphuis formula</topic><topic>Karaburun</topic><topic>LITPACK</topic><topic>Littoral transport</topic><topic>Long-term mean transport rate</topic><topic>Longshore sediment transport</topic><topic>Mathematical models</topic><topic>Modeling</topic><topic>Neural networks</topic><topic>Neurons</topic><topic>Parametric models</topic><topic>RESEARCH PAPERS</topic><topic>Sediment transport</topic><topic>Sediments</topic><topic>Sensitivity analysis</topic><topic>Shorelines</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Wave energy</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Guener, HAAri</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yueksel, Y</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cevik, EOezkan</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Aluminium Industry Abstracts</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Ceramic Abstracts</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts</collection><collection>Corrosion Abstracts</collection><collection>Electronics & Communications Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineered Materials Abstracts</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Materials Business File</collection><collection>Mechanical & Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Oceanic Abstracts</collection><collection>Solid State and Superconductivity Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>METADEX</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>ANTE: Abstracts in New Technology & Engineering</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>Copper Technical Reference Library</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy & Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Academic</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Professional</collection><collection>ProQuest Science Journals</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Journal of coastal research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Guener, HAAri</au><au>Yueksel, Y</au><au>Cevik, EOezkan</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Longshore Sediment Transport—Field Data and Estimations Using Neural Networks, Numerical Model, and Empirical Models</atitle><jtitle>Journal of coastal research</jtitle><date>2013-03-01</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>29</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>311</spage><epage>324</epage><pages>311-324</pages><issn>0749-0208</issn><eissn>1551-5036</eissn><abstract>Ari Güner, H.A.; Yüksel, Y., and Ç evik, E.Ö., 2013. Longshore sediment transport—field data and estimations using neural networks, numerical model, and empirical models. This work suggests an alternative approach, namely, the use of an artificial neural network (ANN), for the estimation of longshore sediment transport (LST). The ANN technique provides a powerful utility for input–output mapping if there is sufficient data and can be useful for modeling processes about which adequate knowledge of physics is limited, such as sediment transport. A feed-forward network was developed to predict the LST from a variety of causative variables. The best network was selected after testing many alternatives. The network was validated by experimental and field data. In addition, the ANN method was applied to the case study area (Karaburun, Turkey), located on the SW coast of the Black Sea. The accuracy of the ANN predictions was evaluated against the measured LST rate at Karaburun and compared with two well-known empirical formulas (CERC formula, Kamphuis formula), and a numerical model (LITPACK). The average, net, annual LST rate for the study area was determined based on the morphological volume differences between the surveys. The volume differences were obtained from the accretion at the secondary breakwater of the harbor located at the western end of the 4-km sandy beach. The harbor acted as a total trap, and the beach surveys were extended to an adequate depth. The measured net LST rate was 72,000 m3/y, and the calculated rates were 370,000, 77,000, 83,000, 85,000, and 80,000 m3/y based on the CERC formula (Ksig = 0.39), the modified CERC formula (Ksig = 0.08), the Kamphuis formula, the LITPACK computer program, and the ANN. All methods employed in this study estimated the LST rates well, except the CERC formula. The CERC formula overestimated the LST rate by a factor of five; nevertheless, with the adjustment of the empirical Ksig value (0.39) to 0.08, the fit to the observed data improved significantly. The Kamphuis formula produced results similar to those predicted by the field data. This confirms the use of the Kamphuis formula in conditions of low-wave energy with breaker heights of less than 1 m, which correspond to the study area's wave condition.</abstract><cop>1656 Cypress Row Drive, West Palm Beach, FL 33411, USA</cop><pub>The Coastal Education and Research Foundation</pub><doi>10.2112/JCOASTRES-D-11-00074.1</doi><tpages>14</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0749-0208 |
ispartof | Journal of coastal research, 2013-03, Vol.29 (2), p.311-324 |
issn | 0749-0208 1551-5036 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1786195275 |
source | JSTOR |
subjects | Accretion artificial neural network Beaches Black Sea Breakwaters CERC formula Coastal Coastal engineering Coasts Empirical analysis field measurement Global positioning systems GPS Harbors Kamphuis formula Karaburun LITPACK Littoral transport Long-term mean transport rate Longshore sediment transport Mathematical models Modeling Neural networks Neurons Parametric models RESEARCH PAPERS Sediment transport Sediments Sensitivity analysis Shorelines Studies Wave energy |
title | Longshore Sediment Transport—Field Data and Estimations Using Neural Networks, Numerical Model, and Empirical Models |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-14T18%3A33%3A43IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Longshore%20Sediment%20Transport%E2%80%94Field%20Data%20and%20Estimations%20Using%20Neural%20Networks,%20Numerical%20Model,%20and%20Empirical%20Models&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20coastal%20research&rft.au=Guener,%20HAAri&rft.date=2013-03-01&rft.volume=29&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=311&rft.epage=324&rft.pages=311-324&rft.issn=0749-0208&rft.eissn=1551-5036&rft_id=info:doi/10.2112/JCOASTRES-D-11-00074.1&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E23353629%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1346651010&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=23353629&rfr_iscdi=true |