Relationships between wind predictions and model resolution over coastal regions
The impact of resolution on wind predictions within regions of complex coastal geometry is evaluated using a quadruple nest of COAMPS® (27km to 1km) to find an optimal configuration of spatial and temporal resolution. Two regions, Turkish Straits System and Chesapeake Bay, are selected because of th...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Ocean engineering 2016-01, Vol.112, p.97-116 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 116 |
---|---|
container_issue | |
container_start_page | 97 |
container_title | Ocean engineering |
container_volume | 112 |
creator | Cambazoglu, Mustafa Kemal Blain, Cheryl Ann Smith, Travis A. Linzell, Robert S. |
description | The impact of resolution on wind predictions within regions of complex coastal geometry is evaluated using a quadruple nest of COAMPS® (27km to 1km) to find an optimal configuration of spatial and temporal resolution. Two regions, Turkish Straits System and Chesapeake Bay, are selected because of their diverse coastal environments, the availability of wind observations and to determine if the relationships between resolution and wind prediction accuracy would be valid for geographically different regions. The coarse resolution model successfully simulates the general trend of the surface wind variation, but cannot capture peak events accurately. Increased spatial resolution results in more accurate wind predictions. The coastline representation and land features impact friction over land and blocking of the winds and affect accuracy of wind predictions. 27-km resolution products lack important details over coastal waters and are not adequate to force high resolution ocean models. No evident improvement in accuracy is observed when increasing the resolution from 3-km to 1-km. An increase in frequency of the wind records from 3-hourly to hourly is required to capture frontal events with strong wind speeds and sharp gradients. Our analysis for both regions suggests the use of hourly atmospheric products at 3-km resolution for oceanic forcing purposes.
•Wind predictions at 4 resolutions are compared using a nested grid atmospheric model.•Coarse resolution grid lack complex land features causing less accurate predictions.•Better representation of coastline is required to improve accuracy in coastal waters.•3-km resolution is found to be more optimum than 1-km for coastal wind predictions.•The use of hourly predictions is strongly needed to accurately capture storm fronts. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.oceaneng.2015.10.019 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1786178337</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0029801815005569</els_id><sourcerecordid>1765975968</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c426t-2a7b117200c3a59245877332f6d7e5e242aed6335be11049d3aed8cb8a2f9f273</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkFtLxDAQhYMouK7-BemjL625NJe-KYs3WFBEn0OaTtcs3aYm3RX_vamrz_owDHPmzIH5EDonuCCYiMt14S2YHvpVQTHhSSwwqQ7QjCjJck65OkQzjGmVK0zUMTqJcY0xFgKzGXp6hs6MzvfxzQ0xq2H8AOizD9c32RCgcfZ7mZk0b3wDXRYg-m47qZnfQcisN3E0k76anKfoqDVdhLOfPkevtzcvi_t8-Xj3sLhe5rakYsypkTUhkmJsmeEVLbmSkjHaikYCB1pSA41gjNdACC6rhqVZ2VoZ2lYtlWyOLva5Q_DvW4ij3rhooesSCb-NmkglUjH2H6vgleSVUMkq9lYbfIwBWj0EtzHhUxOsJ9p6rX9p64n2pCfa6fBqfwjp552DoKN10NtEMIAddePdXxFfO3qMYg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1765975968</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Relationships between wind predictions and model resolution over coastal regions</title><source>Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)</source><creator>Cambazoglu, Mustafa Kemal ; Blain, Cheryl Ann ; Smith, Travis A. ; Linzell, Robert S.</creator><creatorcontrib>Cambazoglu, Mustafa Kemal ; Blain, Cheryl Ann ; Smith, Travis A. ; Linzell, Robert S.</creatorcontrib><description>The impact of resolution on wind predictions within regions of complex coastal geometry is evaluated using a quadruple nest of COAMPS® (27km to 1km) to find an optimal configuration of spatial and temporal resolution. Two regions, Turkish Straits System and Chesapeake Bay, are selected because of their diverse coastal environments, the availability of wind observations and to determine if the relationships between resolution and wind prediction accuracy would be valid for geographically different regions. The coarse resolution model successfully simulates the general trend of the surface wind variation, but cannot capture peak events accurately. Increased spatial resolution results in more accurate wind predictions. The coastline representation and land features impact friction over land and blocking of the winds and affect accuracy of wind predictions. 27-km resolution products lack important details over coastal waters and are not adequate to force high resolution ocean models. No evident improvement in accuracy is observed when increasing the resolution from 3-km to 1-km. An increase in frequency of the wind records from 3-hourly to hourly is required to capture frontal events with strong wind speeds and sharp gradients. Our analysis for both regions suggests the use of hourly atmospheric products at 3-km resolution for oceanic forcing purposes.
•Wind predictions at 4 resolutions are compared using a nested grid atmospheric model.•Coarse resolution grid lack complex land features causing less accurate predictions.•Better representation of coastline is required to improve accuracy in coastal waters.•3-km resolution is found to be more optimum than 1-km for coastal wind predictions.•The use of hourly predictions is strongly needed to accurately capture storm fronts.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0029-8018</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-5258</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.oceaneng.2015.10.019</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Accuracy ; Atmospheric predictions ; Atmospherics ; Chesapeake Bay ; COAMPS ; Coastal ; Computer simulation ; Land ; Marine ; Mathematical models ; Ocean models ; Resolution ; Surface wind ; Turkish Straits System ; Wind speed</subject><ispartof>Ocean engineering, 2016-01, Vol.112, p.97-116</ispartof><rights>2015 Elsevier Ltd</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c426t-2a7b117200c3a59245877332f6d7e5e242aed6335be11049d3aed8cb8a2f9f273</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c426t-2a7b117200c3a59245877332f6d7e5e242aed6335be11049d3aed8cb8a2f9f273</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2015.10.019$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Cambazoglu, Mustafa Kemal</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Blain, Cheryl Ann</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Smith, Travis A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Linzell, Robert S.</creatorcontrib><title>Relationships between wind predictions and model resolution over coastal regions</title><title>Ocean engineering</title><description>The impact of resolution on wind predictions within regions of complex coastal geometry is evaluated using a quadruple nest of COAMPS® (27km to 1km) to find an optimal configuration of spatial and temporal resolution. Two regions, Turkish Straits System and Chesapeake Bay, are selected because of their diverse coastal environments, the availability of wind observations and to determine if the relationships between resolution and wind prediction accuracy would be valid for geographically different regions. The coarse resolution model successfully simulates the general trend of the surface wind variation, but cannot capture peak events accurately. Increased spatial resolution results in more accurate wind predictions. The coastline representation and land features impact friction over land and blocking of the winds and affect accuracy of wind predictions. 27-km resolution products lack important details over coastal waters and are not adequate to force high resolution ocean models. No evident improvement in accuracy is observed when increasing the resolution from 3-km to 1-km. An increase in frequency of the wind records from 3-hourly to hourly is required to capture frontal events with strong wind speeds and sharp gradients. Our analysis for both regions suggests the use of hourly atmospheric products at 3-km resolution for oceanic forcing purposes.
•Wind predictions at 4 resolutions are compared using a nested grid atmospheric model.•Coarse resolution grid lack complex land features causing less accurate predictions.•Better representation of coastline is required to improve accuracy in coastal waters.•3-km resolution is found to be more optimum than 1-km for coastal wind predictions.•The use of hourly predictions is strongly needed to accurately capture storm fronts.</description><subject>Accuracy</subject><subject>Atmospheric predictions</subject><subject>Atmospherics</subject><subject>Chesapeake Bay</subject><subject>COAMPS</subject><subject>Coastal</subject><subject>Computer simulation</subject><subject>Land</subject><subject>Marine</subject><subject>Mathematical models</subject><subject>Ocean models</subject><subject>Resolution</subject><subject>Surface wind</subject><subject>Turkish Straits System</subject><subject>Wind speed</subject><issn>0029-8018</issn><issn>1873-5258</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNkFtLxDAQhYMouK7-BemjL625NJe-KYs3WFBEn0OaTtcs3aYm3RX_vamrz_owDHPmzIH5EDonuCCYiMt14S2YHvpVQTHhSSwwqQ7QjCjJck65OkQzjGmVK0zUMTqJcY0xFgKzGXp6hs6MzvfxzQ0xq2H8AOizD9c32RCgcfZ7mZk0b3wDXRYg-m47qZnfQcisN3E0k76anKfoqDVdhLOfPkevtzcvi_t8-Xj3sLhe5rakYsypkTUhkmJsmeEVLbmSkjHaikYCB1pSA41gjNdACC6rhqVZ2VoZ2lYtlWyOLva5Q_DvW4ij3rhooesSCb-NmkglUjH2H6vgleSVUMkq9lYbfIwBWj0EtzHhUxOsJ9p6rX9p64n2pCfa6fBqfwjp552DoKN10NtEMIAddePdXxFfO3qMYg</recordid><startdate>20160115</startdate><enddate>20160115</enddate><creator>Cambazoglu, Mustafa Kemal</creator><creator>Blain, Cheryl Ann</creator><creator>Smith, Travis A.</creator><creator>Linzell, Robert S.</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7TN</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L7M</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20160115</creationdate><title>Relationships between wind predictions and model resolution over coastal regions</title><author>Cambazoglu, Mustafa Kemal ; Blain, Cheryl Ann ; Smith, Travis A. ; Linzell, Robert S.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c426t-2a7b117200c3a59245877332f6d7e5e242aed6335be11049d3aed8cb8a2f9f273</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Accuracy</topic><topic>Atmospheric predictions</topic><topic>Atmospherics</topic><topic>Chesapeake Bay</topic><topic>COAMPS</topic><topic>Coastal</topic><topic>Computer simulation</topic><topic>Land</topic><topic>Marine</topic><topic>Mathematical models</topic><topic>Ocean models</topic><topic>Resolution</topic><topic>Surface wind</topic><topic>Turkish Straits System</topic><topic>Wind speed</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Cambazoglu, Mustafa Kemal</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Blain, Cheryl Ann</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Smith, Travis A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Linzell, Robert S.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Oceanic Abstracts</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy & Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><jtitle>Ocean engineering</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Cambazoglu, Mustafa Kemal</au><au>Blain, Cheryl Ann</au><au>Smith, Travis A.</au><au>Linzell, Robert S.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Relationships between wind predictions and model resolution over coastal regions</atitle><jtitle>Ocean engineering</jtitle><date>2016-01-15</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>112</volume><spage>97</spage><epage>116</epage><pages>97-116</pages><issn>0029-8018</issn><eissn>1873-5258</eissn><abstract>The impact of resolution on wind predictions within regions of complex coastal geometry is evaluated using a quadruple nest of COAMPS® (27km to 1km) to find an optimal configuration of spatial and temporal resolution. Two regions, Turkish Straits System and Chesapeake Bay, are selected because of their diverse coastal environments, the availability of wind observations and to determine if the relationships between resolution and wind prediction accuracy would be valid for geographically different regions. The coarse resolution model successfully simulates the general trend of the surface wind variation, but cannot capture peak events accurately. Increased spatial resolution results in more accurate wind predictions. The coastline representation and land features impact friction over land and blocking of the winds and affect accuracy of wind predictions. 27-km resolution products lack important details over coastal waters and are not adequate to force high resolution ocean models. No evident improvement in accuracy is observed when increasing the resolution from 3-km to 1-km. An increase in frequency of the wind records from 3-hourly to hourly is required to capture frontal events with strong wind speeds and sharp gradients. Our analysis for both regions suggests the use of hourly atmospheric products at 3-km resolution for oceanic forcing purposes.
•Wind predictions at 4 resolutions are compared using a nested grid atmospheric model.•Coarse resolution grid lack complex land features causing less accurate predictions.•Better representation of coastline is required to improve accuracy in coastal waters.•3-km resolution is found to be more optimum than 1-km for coastal wind predictions.•The use of hourly predictions is strongly needed to accurately capture storm fronts.</abstract><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><doi>10.1016/j.oceaneng.2015.10.019</doi><tpages>20</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0029-8018 |
ispartof | Ocean engineering, 2016-01, Vol.112, p.97-116 |
issn | 0029-8018 1873-5258 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1786178337 |
source | Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier) |
subjects | Accuracy Atmospheric predictions Atmospherics Chesapeake Bay COAMPS Coastal Computer simulation Land Marine Mathematical models Ocean models Resolution Surface wind Turkish Straits System Wind speed |
title | Relationships between wind predictions and model resolution over coastal regions |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-21T19%3A34%3A58IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Relationships%20between%20wind%20predictions%20and%20model%20resolution%20over%20coastal%20regions&rft.jtitle=Ocean%20engineering&rft.au=Cambazoglu,%20Mustafa%20Kemal&rft.date=2016-01-15&rft.volume=112&rft.spage=97&rft.epage=116&rft.pages=97-116&rft.issn=0029-8018&rft.eissn=1873-5258&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2015.10.019&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1765975968%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1765975968&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0029801815005569&rfr_iscdi=true |