What Makes a Strong Organic Electron Donor (or Acceptor)?
Organic electron donors are of importance for a number of applications. However, the factors that are essential for a directed design of compounds with desired reduction power are not clear. Here, we analyze these factors in detail. The intrinsic reduction power, which neglects the environment, has...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Chemistry : a European journal 2015-06, Vol.21 (23), p.8578-8590 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 8590 |
---|---|
container_issue | 23 |
container_start_page | 8578 |
container_title | Chemistry : a European journal |
container_volume | 21 |
creator | Eberle, Benjamin Hübner, Olaf Ziesak, Alexandra Kaifer, Elisabeth Himmel, Hans-Jörg |
description | Organic electron donors are of importance for a number of applications. However, the factors that are essential for a directed design of compounds with desired reduction power are not clear. Here, we analyze these factors in detail. The intrinsic reduction power, which neglects the environment, has to be separated from extrinsic (e.g., solvent) effects. This power could be quantified by the gas‐phase ionization energy. The experimentally obtained redox potentials in solution and the calculated ionization energies in a solvent (modeled with the conductor‐like screening model (COSMO)) include both intrinsic and extrinsic factors. An increase in the conjugated π‐system of organic electron donors leads to an increase in the intrinsic reduction power, but also decreases the solvent stabilization. Hence, intrinsic and extrinsic effects compete against each other; generally the extrinsic effects dominate. We suggest a simple relationship between the redox potential in solution and the gas‐phase ionization energy and the volume of an organic electron donor. We finally arrive at formulas that allow for an estimate of the (gas‐phase) ionization energy of an electron donor or the (gas‐phase) electron affinity of an electron acceptor from the measured redox potentials in solution. The formulas could be used for neutral organic molecules with no or only small static dipole moment and relatively uniform charge distribution after oxidation/reduction.
Size matters: A relationship between the gas‐phase ionization energy and the experienced redox potential in solution is derived. The results highlight the importance of molecular volume in determining the reduction potential in solution (see figure). |
doi_str_mv | 10.1002/chem.201406597 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1786149988</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1683757184</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5807-23359ae08082ca61f9ea86864ec1205e840687ca81fdeba3aa54a68ee8bf24153</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkEtPwkAUhSdGI_jYujRN3OiiOI_Oa2UIopiIxqhxORmGWyiUFmdK1H9vESTGDYubm9x85-Seg9AJwS2CMb10Y5i1KCYJFlzLHdQknJKYScF3URPrRMaCM91AByFMMMZaMLaPGpRrIqjQTaTfxraK-nYKIbLRc-XLYhQ9-pEtMhd1c3DLS3RdFqWPzutpOwfzqvQXV0doL7V5gOP1PkSvN92XTi--f7y967TvY8cVljFljGsLWGFFnRUk1WCVUCIBRyjmoOrPlXRWkXQIA8us5YkVCkANUpoQzg7R-cp37sv3BYTKzLLgIM9tAeUiGCKVIInWSm1HhWKSS6KSGj37h07KhS_qID8Uw4poXVOtFeV8GYKH1Mx9NrP-yxBslv2bZf9m038tOF3bLgYzGG7w38JrQK-AjyyHry12ptPr9v-axyttFir43Gitnxoh62Dm7eHW0P6TfuI9Zhj7Br5jnQM</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1683308199</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>What Makes a Strong Organic Electron Donor (or Acceptor)?</title><source>Wiley Online Library All Journals</source><creator>Eberle, Benjamin ; Hübner, Olaf ; Ziesak, Alexandra ; Kaifer, Elisabeth ; Himmel, Hans-Jörg</creator><creatorcontrib>Eberle, Benjamin ; Hübner, Olaf ; Ziesak, Alexandra ; Kaifer, Elisabeth ; Himmel, Hans-Jörg</creatorcontrib><description>Organic electron donors are of importance for a number of applications. However, the factors that are essential for a directed design of compounds with desired reduction power are not clear. Here, we analyze these factors in detail. The intrinsic reduction power, which neglects the environment, has to be separated from extrinsic (e.g., solvent) effects. This power could be quantified by the gas‐phase ionization energy. The experimentally obtained redox potentials in solution and the calculated ionization energies in a solvent (modeled with the conductor‐like screening model (COSMO)) include both intrinsic and extrinsic factors. An increase in the conjugated π‐system of organic electron donors leads to an increase in the intrinsic reduction power, but also decreases the solvent stabilization. Hence, intrinsic and extrinsic effects compete against each other; generally the extrinsic effects dominate. We suggest a simple relationship between the redox potential in solution and the gas‐phase ionization energy and the volume of an organic electron donor. We finally arrive at formulas that allow for an estimate of the (gas‐phase) ionization energy of an electron donor or the (gas‐phase) electron affinity of an electron acceptor from the measured redox potentials in solution. The formulas could be used for neutral organic molecules with no or only small static dipole moment and relatively uniform charge distribution after oxidation/reduction.
Size matters: A relationship between the gas‐phase ionization energy and the experienced redox potential in solution is derived. The results highlight the importance of molecular volume in determining the reduction potential in solution (see figure).</description><identifier>ISSN: 0947-6539</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1521-3765</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/chem.201406597</identifier><identifier>PMID: 25916269</identifier><identifier>CODEN: CEUJED</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Weinheim: WILEY-VCH Verlag</publisher><subject>Chemistry ; Dipole moment ; Electrode potentials ; electron transfer ; Energy of solution ; Ionization ; ionization potentials ; Mathematical models ; redox chemistry ; Reduction ; solvent effects ; Solvents ; Stabilization</subject><ispartof>Chemistry : a European journal, 2015-06, Vol.21 (23), p.8578-8590</ispartof><rights>2015 WILEY‐VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim</rights><rights>2015 WILEY-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim.</rights><rights>2015 WILEY-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5807-23359ae08082ca61f9ea86864ec1205e840687ca81fdeba3aa54a68ee8bf24153</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5807-23359ae08082ca61f9ea86864ec1205e840687ca81fdeba3aa54a68ee8bf24153</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fchem.201406597$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fchem.201406597$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,27924,27925,45574,45575</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25916269$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Eberle, Benjamin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hübner, Olaf</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ziesak, Alexandra</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kaifer, Elisabeth</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Himmel, Hans-Jörg</creatorcontrib><title>What Makes a Strong Organic Electron Donor (or Acceptor)?</title><title>Chemistry : a European journal</title><addtitle>Chem. Eur. J</addtitle><description>Organic electron donors are of importance for a number of applications. However, the factors that are essential for a directed design of compounds with desired reduction power are not clear. Here, we analyze these factors in detail. The intrinsic reduction power, which neglects the environment, has to be separated from extrinsic (e.g., solvent) effects. This power could be quantified by the gas‐phase ionization energy. The experimentally obtained redox potentials in solution and the calculated ionization energies in a solvent (modeled with the conductor‐like screening model (COSMO)) include both intrinsic and extrinsic factors. An increase in the conjugated π‐system of organic electron donors leads to an increase in the intrinsic reduction power, but also decreases the solvent stabilization. Hence, intrinsic and extrinsic effects compete against each other; generally the extrinsic effects dominate. We suggest a simple relationship between the redox potential in solution and the gas‐phase ionization energy and the volume of an organic electron donor. We finally arrive at formulas that allow for an estimate of the (gas‐phase) ionization energy of an electron donor or the (gas‐phase) electron affinity of an electron acceptor from the measured redox potentials in solution. The formulas could be used for neutral organic molecules with no or only small static dipole moment and relatively uniform charge distribution after oxidation/reduction.
Size matters: A relationship between the gas‐phase ionization energy and the experienced redox potential in solution is derived. The results highlight the importance of molecular volume in determining the reduction potential in solution (see figure).</description><subject>Chemistry</subject><subject>Dipole moment</subject><subject>Electrode potentials</subject><subject>electron transfer</subject><subject>Energy of solution</subject><subject>Ionization</subject><subject>ionization potentials</subject><subject>Mathematical models</subject><subject>redox chemistry</subject><subject>Reduction</subject><subject>solvent effects</subject><subject>Solvents</subject><subject>Stabilization</subject><issn>0947-6539</issn><issn>1521-3765</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkEtPwkAUhSdGI_jYujRN3OiiOI_Oa2UIopiIxqhxORmGWyiUFmdK1H9vESTGDYubm9x85-Seg9AJwS2CMb10Y5i1KCYJFlzLHdQknJKYScF3URPrRMaCM91AByFMMMZaMLaPGpRrIqjQTaTfxraK-nYKIbLRc-XLYhQ9-pEtMhd1c3DLS3RdFqWPzutpOwfzqvQXV0doL7V5gOP1PkSvN92XTi--f7y967TvY8cVljFljGsLWGFFnRUk1WCVUCIBRyjmoOrPlXRWkXQIA8us5YkVCkANUpoQzg7R-cp37sv3BYTKzLLgIM9tAeUiGCKVIInWSm1HhWKSS6KSGj37h07KhS_qID8Uw4poXVOtFeV8GYKH1Mx9NrP-yxBslv2bZf9m038tOF3bLgYzGG7w38JrQK-AjyyHry12ptPr9v-axyttFir43Gitnxoh62Dm7eHW0P6TfuI9Zhj7Br5jnQM</recordid><startdate>20150601</startdate><enddate>20150601</enddate><creator>Eberle, Benjamin</creator><creator>Hübner, Olaf</creator><creator>Ziesak, Alexandra</creator><creator>Kaifer, Elisabeth</creator><creator>Himmel, Hans-Jörg</creator><general>WILEY-VCH Verlag</general><general>WILEY‐VCH Verlag</general><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SR</scope><scope>8BQ</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>JG9</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20150601</creationdate><title>What Makes a Strong Organic Electron Donor (or Acceptor)?</title><author>Eberle, Benjamin ; Hübner, Olaf ; Ziesak, Alexandra ; Kaifer, Elisabeth ; Himmel, Hans-Jörg</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5807-23359ae08082ca61f9ea86864ec1205e840687ca81fdeba3aa54a68ee8bf24153</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Chemistry</topic><topic>Dipole moment</topic><topic>Electrode potentials</topic><topic>electron transfer</topic><topic>Energy of solution</topic><topic>Ionization</topic><topic>ionization potentials</topic><topic>Mathematical models</topic><topic>redox chemistry</topic><topic>Reduction</topic><topic>solvent effects</topic><topic>Solvents</topic><topic>Stabilization</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Eberle, Benjamin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hübner, Olaf</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ziesak, Alexandra</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kaifer, Elisabeth</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Himmel, Hans-Jörg</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Engineered Materials Abstracts</collection><collection>METADEX</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Chemistry : a European journal</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Eberle, Benjamin</au><au>Hübner, Olaf</au><au>Ziesak, Alexandra</au><au>Kaifer, Elisabeth</au><au>Himmel, Hans-Jörg</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>What Makes a Strong Organic Electron Donor (or Acceptor)?</atitle><jtitle>Chemistry : a European journal</jtitle><addtitle>Chem. Eur. J</addtitle><date>2015-06-01</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>21</volume><issue>23</issue><spage>8578</spage><epage>8590</epage><pages>8578-8590</pages><issn>0947-6539</issn><eissn>1521-3765</eissn><coden>CEUJED</coden><abstract>Organic electron donors are of importance for a number of applications. However, the factors that are essential for a directed design of compounds with desired reduction power are not clear. Here, we analyze these factors in detail. The intrinsic reduction power, which neglects the environment, has to be separated from extrinsic (e.g., solvent) effects. This power could be quantified by the gas‐phase ionization energy. The experimentally obtained redox potentials in solution and the calculated ionization energies in a solvent (modeled with the conductor‐like screening model (COSMO)) include both intrinsic and extrinsic factors. An increase in the conjugated π‐system of organic electron donors leads to an increase in the intrinsic reduction power, but also decreases the solvent stabilization. Hence, intrinsic and extrinsic effects compete against each other; generally the extrinsic effects dominate. We suggest a simple relationship between the redox potential in solution and the gas‐phase ionization energy and the volume of an organic electron donor. We finally arrive at formulas that allow for an estimate of the (gas‐phase) ionization energy of an electron donor or the (gas‐phase) electron affinity of an electron acceptor from the measured redox potentials in solution. The formulas could be used for neutral organic molecules with no or only small static dipole moment and relatively uniform charge distribution after oxidation/reduction.
Size matters: A relationship between the gas‐phase ionization energy and the experienced redox potential in solution is derived. The results highlight the importance of molecular volume in determining the reduction potential in solution (see figure).</abstract><cop>Weinheim</cop><pub>WILEY-VCH Verlag</pub><pmid>25916269</pmid><doi>10.1002/chem.201406597</doi><tpages>13</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0947-6539 |
ispartof | Chemistry : a European journal, 2015-06, Vol.21 (23), p.8578-8590 |
issn | 0947-6539 1521-3765 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1786149988 |
source | Wiley Online Library All Journals |
subjects | Chemistry Dipole moment Electrode potentials electron transfer Energy of solution Ionization ionization potentials Mathematical models redox chemistry Reduction solvent effects Solvents Stabilization |
title | What Makes a Strong Organic Electron Donor (or Acceptor)? |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T11%3A29%3A25IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=What%20Makes%20a%20Strong%20Organic%20Electron%20Donor%20(or%20Acceptor)?&rft.jtitle=Chemistry%20:%20a%20European%20journal&rft.au=Eberle,%20Benjamin&rft.date=2015-06-01&rft.volume=21&rft.issue=23&rft.spage=8578&rft.epage=8590&rft.pages=8578-8590&rft.issn=0947-6539&rft.eissn=1521-3765&rft.coden=CEUJED&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/chem.201406597&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1683757184%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1683308199&rft_id=info:pmid/25916269&rfr_iscdi=true |