Effect of a multi-modal intervention on immunization rates in obstetrics and gynecology clinics

Background There is increasing attention on immunizations by obstetrician-gynecologists and a need to improve vaccination rates for all women. Objective To evaluate the effect of a multimodal intervention on rates of immunization with tetanus, diphtheria, and acellular pertussis (Tdap); human papill...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:American journal of obstetrics and gynecology 2016-05, Vol.214 (5), p.617.e1-617.e7
Hauptverfasser: Mazzoni, Sara E., MD, MPH, Brewer, Sarah E., MPA, Pyrzanowski, Jennifer L., MSPH, Durfee, M. Josh, MSPH, Dickinson, L. Miriam, PhD, Barnard, Juliana G., MA, Dempsey, Amanda F., MD, PhD, MPH, O’Leary, Sean T., MD, MPH
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 617.e7
container_issue 5
container_start_page 617.e1
container_title American journal of obstetrics and gynecology
container_volume 214
creator Mazzoni, Sara E., MD, MPH
Brewer, Sarah E., MPA
Pyrzanowski, Jennifer L., MSPH
Durfee, M. Josh, MSPH
Dickinson, L. Miriam, PhD
Barnard, Juliana G., MA
Dempsey, Amanda F., MD, PhD, MPH
O’Leary, Sean T., MD, MPH
description Background There is increasing attention on immunizations by obstetrician-gynecologists and a need to improve vaccination rates for all women. Objective To evaluate the effect of a multimodal intervention on rates of immunization with tetanus, diphtheria, and acellular pertussis (Tdap); human papillomavirus (HPV); and influenza in outpatient obstetrics and gynecology clinics. Study Design Immunization rates at 2 clinics were compared pre- and post-implementation of multiple interventions at a public integrated health-care system. Study interventions began on June 6, 2012 and concluded on May 31, 2014; the preimplementation time period used was June 6, 2010 to June 5, 2012. Interventions included stocking of immunizations in clinics, revision and expansion of standing orders, creation of a reminder/recall program, identification of an immunization champion to give direct provider feedback, expansion of a payment assistance program, and staff education. All women aged 15 and older who made a clinic visit during influenza season were included in the influenza cohort; women who delivered an infant during the study time period and had at least 1 prenatal visit within 9 months preceding delivery were included in the Tdap cohort; each clinic visit by a nonpregnant woman aged 15–26 years was assessed and included in the HPV analysis as an eligible visit if the patient was lacking any of the 3 HPV vaccines in the series. The primary outcome was receipt of influenza and Tdap vaccine per current American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists guidelines and receipt of HPV vaccine during eligible visits. Influenza and Tdap were assessed with overall coverage rates at the institutional level, and HPV was assessed at the visit level by captured opportunities. All analyses included generalized estimating equations and the primary outcome was assessed with time as a covariate in all models. Results A total of 19,409 observations were included in the influenza cohort (10,231 pre- and 9178 post-intervention), 2741 in the Tdap cohort (1248 pre- and 1493 post-intervention), and 12,443 in the HPV cohort (7966 pre- and 4477 post-intervention). Our population was largely Hispanic, English-speaking, and publicly insured. The rate of influenza vaccination increased from 35.4% pre-intervention to 46.0% post-intervention ( P < .001). The overall rate for Tdap vaccination increased from 87.6% pre-intervention to 94.5% post-intervention until the recommendation to vaccinate during
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.ajog.2015.11.018
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1785746408</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>1_s2_0_S0002937815023479</els_id><sourcerecordid>1785746408</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c455t-152536d38bf994d3d7e1a0a5f5253231a1d4363f9cc4f5891bc6f156c190bb3c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kV-L1TAQxYMo7nX1C_ggefSlNZM0aQsiyLL-gQUf1OeQppNLapusSbtw99ObelcffBAGhhnOOTC_IeQlsBoYqDdTbaZ4rDkDWQPUDLpH5ACsbyvVqe4xOTDGeNWLtrsgz3Ke9pH3_Cm54ErxtuXtgehr59CuNDpq6LLNq6-WOJqZ-rBiusOw-hhoKb8sW_D35veczIq5SGgc8opr8jZTE0Z6PAW0cY7HE7WzD2X9nDxxZs744qFfku8frr9dfapuvnz8fPX-prKNlGsFkkuhRtENru-bUYwtgmFGun3PBRgYG6GE661tnOx6GKxyIJWFng2DsOKSvD7n3qb4c8O86sVni_NsAsYta2g72TaqYV2R8rPUpphzQqdvk19MOmlgegerJ72D1TtYDaAL2GJ69ZC_DQuOfy1_SBbB27MAy5V3HpPO1mOwOPpUAOsx-v_nv_vHfgZo5h94wjzFLYXCT4POXDP9df_l_lmQjIum7cUvIW2fJw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1785746408</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Effect of a multi-modal intervention on immunization rates in obstetrics and gynecology clinics</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Mazzoni, Sara E., MD, MPH ; Brewer, Sarah E., MPA ; Pyrzanowski, Jennifer L., MSPH ; Durfee, M. Josh, MSPH ; Dickinson, L. Miriam, PhD ; Barnard, Juliana G., MA ; Dempsey, Amanda F., MD, PhD, MPH ; O’Leary, Sean T., MD, MPH</creator><creatorcontrib>Mazzoni, Sara E., MD, MPH ; Brewer, Sarah E., MPA ; Pyrzanowski, Jennifer L., MSPH ; Durfee, M. Josh, MSPH ; Dickinson, L. Miriam, PhD ; Barnard, Juliana G., MA ; Dempsey, Amanda F., MD, PhD, MPH ; O’Leary, Sean T., MD, MPH</creatorcontrib><description>Background There is increasing attention on immunizations by obstetrician-gynecologists and a need to improve vaccination rates for all women. Objective To evaluate the effect of a multimodal intervention on rates of immunization with tetanus, diphtheria, and acellular pertussis (Tdap); human papillomavirus (HPV); and influenza in outpatient obstetrics and gynecology clinics. Study Design Immunization rates at 2 clinics were compared pre- and post-implementation of multiple interventions at a public integrated health-care system. Study interventions began on June 6, 2012 and concluded on May 31, 2014; the preimplementation time period used was June 6, 2010 to June 5, 2012. Interventions included stocking of immunizations in clinics, revision and expansion of standing orders, creation of a reminder/recall program, identification of an immunization champion to give direct provider feedback, expansion of a payment assistance program, and staff education. All women aged 15 and older who made a clinic visit during influenza season were included in the influenza cohort; women who delivered an infant during the study time period and had at least 1 prenatal visit within 9 months preceding delivery were included in the Tdap cohort; each clinic visit by a nonpregnant woman aged 15–26 years was assessed and included in the HPV analysis as an eligible visit if the patient was lacking any of the 3 HPV vaccines in the series. The primary outcome was receipt of influenza and Tdap vaccine per current American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists guidelines and receipt of HPV vaccine during eligible visits. Influenza and Tdap were assessed with overall coverage rates at the institutional level, and HPV was assessed at the visit level by captured opportunities. All analyses included generalized estimating equations and the primary outcome was assessed with time as a covariate in all models. Results A total of 19,409 observations were included in the influenza cohort (10,231 pre- and 9178 post-intervention), 2741 in the Tdap cohort (1248 pre- and 1493 post-intervention), and 12,443 in the HPV cohort (7966 pre- and 4477 post-intervention). Our population was largely Hispanic, English-speaking, and publicly insured. The rate of influenza vaccination increased from 35.4% pre-intervention to 46.0% post-intervention ( P &lt; .001). The overall rate for Tdap vaccination increased from 87.6% pre-intervention to 94.5% post-intervention until the recommendation to vaccinate during each pregnancy was implemented (z = 4.58, P &lt; .0001). The average Tdap up-to-date rate after that recommendation was 75.0% (z = -5.77, P &lt; .0001). The overall rate of HPV vaccination with an eligible visit increased from 7.1% before to 23.7% after the intervention. Conclusion Using evidence-based practices largely established in other settings, our intervention was associated with increased rates of influenza, Tdap, and HPV vaccination in outpatient underserved obstetrics and gynecology clinics. Integrating such evidence-based practices into routine obstetrics and gynecology care could positively impact preventive health for many women.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0002-9378</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1097-6868</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2015.11.018</identifier><identifier>PMID: 26627727</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Adult ; Ambulatory Care Facilities ; Colorado ; Diphtheria Toxoid ; Evidence-Based Practice ; Female ; Gynecology ; Health Promotion - organization &amp; administration ; human papillomavirus (HPV) ; Humans ; immunizations ; influenza ; Influenza Vaccines ; Obstetrics ; Obstetrics and Gynecology ; Papillomavirus Vaccines ; Pertussis Vaccine ; Tetanus Toxoid ; tetanus, diphtheria, and acellular pertussis (Tdap) ; Vaccination - statistics &amp; numerical data ; vaccines in pregnancy ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>American journal of obstetrics and gynecology, 2016-05, Vol.214 (5), p.617.e1-617.e7</ispartof><rights>Elsevier Inc.</rights><rights>2016 Elsevier Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c455t-152536d38bf994d3d7e1a0a5f5253231a1d4363f9cc4f5891bc6f156c190bb3c3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c455t-152536d38bf994d3d7e1a0a5f5253231a1d4363f9cc4f5891bc6f156c190bb3c3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2015.11.018$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,3537,27905,27906,45976</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26627727$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Mazzoni, Sara E., MD, MPH</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brewer, Sarah E., MPA</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pyrzanowski, Jennifer L., MSPH</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Durfee, M. Josh, MSPH</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dickinson, L. Miriam, PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Barnard, Juliana G., MA</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dempsey, Amanda F., MD, PhD, MPH</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>O’Leary, Sean T., MD, MPH</creatorcontrib><title>Effect of a multi-modal intervention on immunization rates in obstetrics and gynecology clinics</title><title>American journal of obstetrics and gynecology</title><addtitle>Am J Obstet Gynecol</addtitle><description>Background There is increasing attention on immunizations by obstetrician-gynecologists and a need to improve vaccination rates for all women. Objective To evaluate the effect of a multimodal intervention on rates of immunization with tetanus, diphtheria, and acellular pertussis (Tdap); human papillomavirus (HPV); and influenza in outpatient obstetrics and gynecology clinics. Study Design Immunization rates at 2 clinics were compared pre- and post-implementation of multiple interventions at a public integrated health-care system. Study interventions began on June 6, 2012 and concluded on May 31, 2014; the preimplementation time period used was June 6, 2010 to June 5, 2012. Interventions included stocking of immunizations in clinics, revision and expansion of standing orders, creation of a reminder/recall program, identification of an immunization champion to give direct provider feedback, expansion of a payment assistance program, and staff education. All women aged 15 and older who made a clinic visit during influenza season were included in the influenza cohort; women who delivered an infant during the study time period and had at least 1 prenatal visit within 9 months preceding delivery were included in the Tdap cohort; each clinic visit by a nonpregnant woman aged 15–26 years was assessed and included in the HPV analysis as an eligible visit if the patient was lacking any of the 3 HPV vaccines in the series. The primary outcome was receipt of influenza and Tdap vaccine per current American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists guidelines and receipt of HPV vaccine during eligible visits. Influenza and Tdap were assessed with overall coverage rates at the institutional level, and HPV was assessed at the visit level by captured opportunities. All analyses included generalized estimating equations and the primary outcome was assessed with time as a covariate in all models. Results A total of 19,409 observations were included in the influenza cohort (10,231 pre- and 9178 post-intervention), 2741 in the Tdap cohort (1248 pre- and 1493 post-intervention), and 12,443 in the HPV cohort (7966 pre- and 4477 post-intervention). Our population was largely Hispanic, English-speaking, and publicly insured. The rate of influenza vaccination increased from 35.4% pre-intervention to 46.0% post-intervention ( P &lt; .001). The overall rate for Tdap vaccination increased from 87.6% pre-intervention to 94.5% post-intervention until the recommendation to vaccinate during each pregnancy was implemented (z = 4.58, P &lt; .0001). The average Tdap up-to-date rate after that recommendation was 75.0% (z = -5.77, P &lt; .0001). The overall rate of HPV vaccination with an eligible visit increased from 7.1% before to 23.7% after the intervention. Conclusion Using evidence-based practices largely established in other settings, our intervention was associated with increased rates of influenza, Tdap, and HPV vaccination in outpatient underserved obstetrics and gynecology clinics. Integrating such evidence-based practices into routine obstetrics and gynecology care could positively impact preventive health for many women.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Ambulatory Care Facilities</subject><subject>Colorado</subject><subject>Diphtheria Toxoid</subject><subject>Evidence-Based Practice</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Gynecology</subject><subject>Health Promotion - organization &amp; administration</subject><subject>human papillomavirus (HPV)</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>immunizations</subject><subject>influenza</subject><subject>Influenza Vaccines</subject><subject>Obstetrics</subject><subject>Obstetrics and Gynecology</subject><subject>Papillomavirus Vaccines</subject><subject>Pertussis Vaccine</subject><subject>Tetanus Toxoid</subject><subject>tetanus, diphtheria, and acellular pertussis (Tdap)</subject><subject>Vaccination - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>vaccines in pregnancy</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>0002-9378</issn><issn>1097-6868</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kV-L1TAQxYMo7nX1C_ggefSlNZM0aQsiyLL-gQUf1OeQppNLapusSbtw99ObelcffBAGhhnOOTC_IeQlsBoYqDdTbaZ4rDkDWQPUDLpH5ACsbyvVqe4xOTDGeNWLtrsgz3Ke9pH3_Cm54ErxtuXtgehr59CuNDpq6LLNq6-WOJqZ-rBiusOw-hhoKb8sW_D35veczIq5SGgc8opr8jZTE0Z6PAW0cY7HE7WzD2X9nDxxZs744qFfku8frr9dfapuvnz8fPX-prKNlGsFkkuhRtENru-bUYwtgmFGun3PBRgYG6GE661tnOx6GKxyIJWFng2DsOKSvD7n3qb4c8O86sVni_NsAsYta2g72TaqYV2R8rPUpphzQqdvk19MOmlgegerJ72D1TtYDaAL2GJ69ZC_DQuOfy1_SBbB27MAy5V3HpPO1mOwOPpUAOsx-v_nv_vHfgZo5h94wjzFLYXCT4POXDP9df_l_lmQjIum7cUvIW2fJw</recordid><startdate>20160501</startdate><enddate>20160501</enddate><creator>Mazzoni, Sara E., MD, MPH</creator><creator>Brewer, Sarah E., MPA</creator><creator>Pyrzanowski, Jennifer L., MSPH</creator><creator>Durfee, M. Josh, MSPH</creator><creator>Dickinson, L. Miriam, PhD</creator><creator>Barnard, Juliana G., MA</creator><creator>Dempsey, Amanda F., MD, PhD, MPH</creator><creator>O’Leary, Sean T., MD, MPH</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20160501</creationdate><title>Effect of a multi-modal intervention on immunization rates in obstetrics and gynecology clinics</title><author>Mazzoni, Sara E., MD, MPH ; Brewer, Sarah E., MPA ; Pyrzanowski, Jennifer L., MSPH ; Durfee, M. Josh, MSPH ; Dickinson, L. Miriam, PhD ; Barnard, Juliana G., MA ; Dempsey, Amanda F., MD, PhD, MPH ; O’Leary, Sean T., MD, MPH</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c455t-152536d38bf994d3d7e1a0a5f5253231a1d4363f9cc4f5891bc6f156c190bb3c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Ambulatory Care Facilities</topic><topic>Colorado</topic><topic>Diphtheria Toxoid</topic><topic>Evidence-Based Practice</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Gynecology</topic><topic>Health Promotion - organization &amp; administration</topic><topic>human papillomavirus (HPV)</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>immunizations</topic><topic>influenza</topic><topic>Influenza Vaccines</topic><topic>Obstetrics</topic><topic>Obstetrics and Gynecology</topic><topic>Papillomavirus Vaccines</topic><topic>Pertussis Vaccine</topic><topic>Tetanus Toxoid</topic><topic>tetanus, diphtheria, and acellular pertussis (Tdap)</topic><topic>Vaccination - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>vaccines in pregnancy</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Mazzoni, Sara E., MD, MPH</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brewer, Sarah E., MPA</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pyrzanowski, Jennifer L., MSPH</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Durfee, M. Josh, MSPH</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dickinson, L. Miriam, PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Barnard, Juliana G., MA</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dempsey, Amanda F., MD, PhD, MPH</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>O’Leary, Sean T., MD, MPH</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>American journal of obstetrics and gynecology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Mazzoni, Sara E., MD, MPH</au><au>Brewer, Sarah E., MPA</au><au>Pyrzanowski, Jennifer L., MSPH</au><au>Durfee, M. Josh, MSPH</au><au>Dickinson, L. Miriam, PhD</au><au>Barnard, Juliana G., MA</au><au>Dempsey, Amanda F., MD, PhD, MPH</au><au>O’Leary, Sean T., MD, MPH</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Effect of a multi-modal intervention on immunization rates in obstetrics and gynecology clinics</atitle><jtitle>American journal of obstetrics and gynecology</jtitle><addtitle>Am J Obstet Gynecol</addtitle><date>2016-05-01</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>214</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>617.e1</spage><epage>617.e7</epage><pages>617.e1-617.e7</pages><issn>0002-9378</issn><eissn>1097-6868</eissn><abstract>Background There is increasing attention on immunizations by obstetrician-gynecologists and a need to improve vaccination rates for all women. Objective To evaluate the effect of a multimodal intervention on rates of immunization with tetanus, diphtheria, and acellular pertussis (Tdap); human papillomavirus (HPV); and influenza in outpatient obstetrics and gynecology clinics. Study Design Immunization rates at 2 clinics were compared pre- and post-implementation of multiple interventions at a public integrated health-care system. Study interventions began on June 6, 2012 and concluded on May 31, 2014; the preimplementation time period used was June 6, 2010 to June 5, 2012. Interventions included stocking of immunizations in clinics, revision and expansion of standing orders, creation of a reminder/recall program, identification of an immunization champion to give direct provider feedback, expansion of a payment assistance program, and staff education. All women aged 15 and older who made a clinic visit during influenza season were included in the influenza cohort; women who delivered an infant during the study time period and had at least 1 prenatal visit within 9 months preceding delivery were included in the Tdap cohort; each clinic visit by a nonpregnant woman aged 15–26 years was assessed and included in the HPV analysis as an eligible visit if the patient was lacking any of the 3 HPV vaccines in the series. The primary outcome was receipt of influenza and Tdap vaccine per current American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists guidelines and receipt of HPV vaccine during eligible visits. Influenza and Tdap were assessed with overall coverage rates at the institutional level, and HPV was assessed at the visit level by captured opportunities. All analyses included generalized estimating equations and the primary outcome was assessed with time as a covariate in all models. Results A total of 19,409 observations were included in the influenza cohort (10,231 pre- and 9178 post-intervention), 2741 in the Tdap cohort (1248 pre- and 1493 post-intervention), and 12,443 in the HPV cohort (7966 pre- and 4477 post-intervention). Our population was largely Hispanic, English-speaking, and publicly insured. The rate of influenza vaccination increased from 35.4% pre-intervention to 46.0% post-intervention ( P &lt; .001). The overall rate for Tdap vaccination increased from 87.6% pre-intervention to 94.5% post-intervention until the recommendation to vaccinate during each pregnancy was implemented (z = 4.58, P &lt; .0001). The average Tdap up-to-date rate after that recommendation was 75.0% (z = -5.77, P &lt; .0001). The overall rate of HPV vaccination with an eligible visit increased from 7.1% before to 23.7% after the intervention. Conclusion Using evidence-based practices largely established in other settings, our intervention was associated with increased rates of influenza, Tdap, and HPV vaccination in outpatient underserved obstetrics and gynecology clinics. Integrating such evidence-based practices into routine obstetrics and gynecology care could positively impact preventive health for many women.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>26627727</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.ajog.2015.11.018</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0002-9378
ispartof American journal of obstetrics and gynecology, 2016-05, Vol.214 (5), p.617.e1-617.e7
issn 0002-9378
1097-6868
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1785746408
source MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Adult
Ambulatory Care Facilities
Colorado
Diphtheria Toxoid
Evidence-Based Practice
Female
Gynecology
Health Promotion - organization & administration
human papillomavirus (HPV)
Humans
immunizations
influenza
Influenza Vaccines
Obstetrics
Obstetrics and Gynecology
Papillomavirus Vaccines
Pertussis Vaccine
Tetanus Toxoid
tetanus, diphtheria, and acellular pertussis (Tdap)
Vaccination - statistics & numerical data
vaccines in pregnancy
Young Adult
title Effect of a multi-modal intervention on immunization rates in obstetrics and gynecology clinics
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-19T15%3A21%3A41IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Effect%20of%20a%20multi-modal%20intervention%20on%20immunization%20rates%20in%20obstetrics%20and%20gynecology%20clinics&rft.jtitle=American%20journal%20of%20obstetrics%20and%20gynecology&rft.au=Mazzoni,%20Sara%20E.,%20MD,%20MPH&rft.date=2016-05-01&rft.volume=214&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=617.e1&rft.epage=617.e7&rft.pages=617.e1-617.e7&rft.issn=0002-9378&rft.eissn=1097-6868&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.ajog.2015.11.018&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1785746408%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1785746408&rft_id=info:pmid/26627727&rft_els_id=1_s2_0_S0002937815023479&rfr_iscdi=true