Totally laparoscopic spleen-preserving splenic hilum lymph nodes dissection in radical total gastrectomy: an omnibearing method

Objective To investigate the feasibility and safety of laparoscopic spleen-preserving splenic hilum lymph nodes (LNs) dissection for advanced proximal gastric cancer using an omnibearing method. Methods Between August 2013 and December 2014, 16 patients with advanced proximal gastric cancer treated...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Surgical endoscopy 2016-05, Vol.30 (5), p.2030-2035
Hauptverfasser: Wang, Wei, Liu, Zhiwei, Xiong, Wenjun, Zheng, Yansheng, Luo, Lijie, Diao, Dechang, Wan, Jin
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 2035
container_issue 5
container_start_page 2030
container_title Surgical endoscopy
container_volume 30
creator Wang, Wei
Liu, Zhiwei
Xiong, Wenjun
Zheng, Yansheng
Luo, Lijie
Diao, Dechang
Wan, Jin
description Objective To investigate the feasibility and safety of laparoscopic spleen-preserving splenic hilum lymph nodes (LNs) dissection for advanced proximal gastric cancer using an omnibearing method. Methods Between August 2013 and December 2014, 16 patients with advanced proximal gastric cancer treated in Guangdong Province Hospital of Chinese Medicine, were enrolled and subsequently underwent laparoscopic radical total gastrectomy (TG) with spleen-preserving splenic hilum LNs dissection. During dissecting Nos. 10 and 11 LNs, we divided them into two parts, namely LNs anterosuperior and posterior to the splenic vessel. The clinicopathological characteristics, intraoperative outcomes and postoperative courses were retrospectively collected and analyzed in the study. Results Laparoscopic surgery was successfully completed in all 16 patients without conversion to open surgery, and no perioperative death occurred. The mean operating time was 328.75 ± 46.96 min, and the mean estimated blood loss was 135.63 ± 62.07 ml. One patient experienced intraoperative bleeding due to the splenic vein injury which was successfully handled with laparoscopic vessel suturing, and one postoperative pulmonary infection was recorded. The mean time to first flatus was 3.56 ± 1.03 days with a mean 9.63 ± 1.50 days of postoperative hospital stay. The mean number of retrieved LNs was 28.31 ± 5.99, in which LNs anterosuperior to splenic artery was 2.88 ± 2.66 and LNs posterior was 1.38 ± 1.75. Conclusion Laparoscopic TG with spleen-preserving splenic hilum LNs dissection using an omnibearing method for advanced proximal gastric cancer was safe and technically feasible in experienced hands. Further studies in terms of its clinical significance are needed.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s00464-015-4438-9
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1785733644</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1785733644</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c372t-285946bc2c30b23af61eaded1d6489dae2d3101deaf573edc7f9b09559706a83</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kUuLFDEUhYM4OG2PP8CNBNzMJppXPeJOhvEBA256H1LJrekMqaRMqoRe-dcnZY8igqsLud85N5yD0GtG3zFKu_eFUtlKQllDpBQ9Uc_QjknBCeesf452VAlKeKfkJXpZygOtuGLNC3TJW06ZZN0O_TykxYRwwsHMJqdi0-wtLnMAiGTOUCD_8PH-10usm6MP64TDaZqPOCYHBTtfCtjFp4h9xNk4b03Ay2aL701Zcl2m6fQBm4jTFP0AJm-OEyzH5K7QxWhCgVdPc48On24PN1_I3bfPX28-3hErOr4Q3jdKtoPlVtCBCzO2DIwDx1wre-UMcCcYZQ7M2HQCnO1GNVDVNKqjrenFHl2fbeecvq9QFj35YiEEEyGtRbOurzrR1hj36O0_6ENac6yf2yjZdkJyXil2pmwNrWQY9Zz9ZPJJM6q3cvS5HF3L0Vs5WlXNmyfndZjA_VH8bqMC_AyUeYsI8l-n_-v6CGWhnKQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1784673422</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Totally laparoscopic spleen-preserving splenic hilum lymph nodes dissection in radical total gastrectomy: an omnibearing method</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Springer Online Journals Complete</source><creator>Wang, Wei ; Liu, Zhiwei ; Xiong, Wenjun ; Zheng, Yansheng ; Luo, Lijie ; Diao, Dechang ; Wan, Jin</creator><creatorcontrib>Wang, Wei ; Liu, Zhiwei ; Xiong, Wenjun ; Zheng, Yansheng ; Luo, Lijie ; Diao, Dechang ; Wan, Jin</creatorcontrib><description>Objective To investigate the feasibility and safety of laparoscopic spleen-preserving splenic hilum lymph nodes (LNs) dissection for advanced proximal gastric cancer using an omnibearing method. Methods Between August 2013 and December 2014, 16 patients with advanced proximal gastric cancer treated in Guangdong Province Hospital of Chinese Medicine, were enrolled and subsequently underwent laparoscopic radical total gastrectomy (TG) with spleen-preserving splenic hilum LNs dissection. During dissecting Nos. 10 and 11 LNs, we divided them into two parts, namely LNs anterosuperior and posterior to the splenic vessel. The clinicopathological characteristics, intraoperative outcomes and postoperative courses were retrospectively collected and analyzed in the study. Results Laparoscopic surgery was successfully completed in all 16 patients without conversion to open surgery, and no perioperative death occurred. The mean operating time was 328.75 ± 46.96 min, and the mean estimated blood loss was 135.63 ± 62.07 ml. One patient experienced intraoperative bleeding due to the splenic vein injury which was successfully handled with laparoscopic vessel suturing, and one postoperative pulmonary infection was recorded. The mean time to first flatus was 3.56 ± 1.03 days with a mean 9.63 ± 1.50 days of postoperative hospital stay. The mean number of retrieved LNs was 28.31 ± 5.99, in which LNs anterosuperior to splenic artery was 2.88 ± 2.66 and LNs posterior was 1.38 ± 1.75. Conclusion Laparoscopic TG with spleen-preserving splenic hilum LNs dissection using an omnibearing method for advanced proximal gastric cancer was safe and technically feasible in experienced hands. Further studies in terms of its clinical significance are needed.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0930-2794</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1432-2218</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s00464-015-4438-9</identifier><identifier>PMID: 26201417</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Springer US</publisher><subject>Abdominal Surgery ; Aged ; Carcinoma - surgery ; Conversion to Open Surgery ; Dissection ; Feasibility Studies ; Female ; Gastrectomy - methods ; Gastric cancer ; Gastroenterology ; Gastrointestinal surgery ; Gynecology ; Hepatology ; Hospitals ; Humans ; Intraoperative Complications - surgery ; Laparoscopy ; Laparoscopy - methods ; Length of Stay ; Lymph Node Excision - methods ; Lymph Nodes - pathology ; Lymphatic system ; Male ; Medicine ; Medicine &amp; Public Health ; Metastasis ; Middle Aged ; Operative Time ; Organ Sparing Treatments ; Pancreas ; Patients rights ; Postoperative Complications - epidemiology ; Proctology ; Retrospective Studies ; Spleen ; Spleen - surgery ; Splenic Artery ; Splenic Vein - injuries ; Splenic Vein - surgery ; Stomach Neoplasms - surgery ; Surgeons ; Surgery ; Suture Techniques ; Veins &amp; arteries</subject><ispartof>Surgical endoscopy, 2016-05, Vol.30 (5), p.2030-2035</ispartof><rights>Springer Science+Business Media New York 2015</rights><rights>Springer Science+Business Media New York 2016</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c372t-285946bc2c30b23af61eaded1d6489dae2d3101deaf573edc7f9b09559706a83</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c372t-285946bc2c30b23af61eaded1d6489dae2d3101deaf573edc7f9b09559706a83</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00464-015-4438-9$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00464-015-4438-9$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>315,781,785,27929,27930,41493,42562,51324</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26201417$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Wang, Wei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liu, Zhiwei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xiong, Wenjun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zheng, Yansheng</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Luo, Lijie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Diao, Dechang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wan, Jin</creatorcontrib><title>Totally laparoscopic spleen-preserving splenic hilum lymph nodes dissection in radical total gastrectomy: an omnibearing method</title><title>Surgical endoscopy</title><addtitle>Surg Endosc</addtitle><addtitle>Surg Endosc</addtitle><description>Objective To investigate the feasibility and safety of laparoscopic spleen-preserving splenic hilum lymph nodes (LNs) dissection for advanced proximal gastric cancer using an omnibearing method. Methods Between August 2013 and December 2014, 16 patients with advanced proximal gastric cancer treated in Guangdong Province Hospital of Chinese Medicine, were enrolled and subsequently underwent laparoscopic radical total gastrectomy (TG) with spleen-preserving splenic hilum LNs dissection. During dissecting Nos. 10 and 11 LNs, we divided them into two parts, namely LNs anterosuperior and posterior to the splenic vessel. The clinicopathological characteristics, intraoperative outcomes and postoperative courses were retrospectively collected and analyzed in the study. Results Laparoscopic surgery was successfully completed in all 16 patients without conversion to open surgery, and no perioperative death occurred. The mean operating time was 328.75 ± 46.96 min, and the mean estimated blood loss was 135.63 ± 62.07 ml. One patient experienced intraoperative bleeding due to the splenic vein injury which was successfully handled with laparoscopic vessel suturing, and one postoperative pulmonary infection was recorded. The mean time to first flatus was 3.56 ± 1.03 days with a mean 9.63 ± 1.50 days of postoperative hospital stay. The mean number of retrieved LNs was 28.31 ± 5.99, in which LNs anterosuperior to splenic artery was 2.88 ± 2.66 and LNs posterior was 1.38 ± 1.75. Conclusion Laparoscopic TG with spleen-preserving splenic hilum LNs dissection using an omnibearing method for advanced proximal gastric cancer was safe and technically feasible in experienced hands. Further studies in terms of its clinical significance are needed.</description><subject>Abdominal Surgery</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Carcinoma - surgery</subject><subject>Conversion to Open Surgery</subject><subject>Dissection</subject><subject>Feasibility Studies</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Gastrectomy - methods</subject><subject>Gastric cancer</subject><subject>Gastroenterology</subject><subject>Gastrointestinal surgery</subject><subject>Gynecology</subject><subject>Hepatology</subject><subject>Hospitals</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Intraoperative Complications - surgery</subject><subject>Laparoscopy</subject><subject>Laparoscopy - methods</subject><subject>Length of Stay</subject><subject>Lymph Node Excision - methods</subject><subject>Lymph Nodes - pathology</subject><subject>Lymphatic system</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine &amp; Public Health</subject><subject>Metastasis</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Operative Time</subject><subject>Organ Sparing Treatments</subject><subject>Pancreas</subject><subject>Patients rights</subject><subject>Postoperative Complications - epidemiology</subject><subject>Proctology</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Spleen</subject><subject>Spleen - surgery</subject><subject>Splenic Artery</subject><subject>Splenic Vein - injuries</subject><subject>Splenic Vein - surgery</subject><subject>Stomach Neoplasms - surgery</subject><subject>Surgeons</subject><subject>Surgery</subject><subject>Suture Techniques</subject><subject>Veins &amp; arteries</subject><issn>0930-2794</issn><issn>1432-2218</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kUuLFDEUhYM4OG2PP8CNBNzMJppXPeJOhvEBA256H1LJrekMqaRMqoRe-dcnZY8igqsLud85N5yD0GtG3zFKu_eFUtlKQllDpBQ9Uc_QjknBCeesf452VAlKeKfkJXpZygOtuGLNC3TJW06ZZN0O_TykxYRwwsHMJqdi0-wtLnMAiGTOUCD_8PH-10usm6MP64TDaZqPOCYHBTtfCtjFp4h9xNk4b03Ay2aL701Zcl2m6fQBm4jTFP0AJm-OEyzH5K7QxWhCgVdPc48On24PN1_I3bfPX28-3hErOr4Q3jdKtoPlVtCBCzO2DIwDx1wre-UMcCcYZQ7M2HQCnO1GNVDVNKqjrenFHl2fbeecvq9QFj35YiEEEyGtRbOurzrR1hj36O0_6ENac6yf2yjZdkJyXil2pmwNrWQY9Zz9ZPJJM6q3cvS5HF3L0Vs5WlXNmyfndZjA_VH8bqMC_AyUeYsI8l-n_-v6CGWhnKQ</recordid><startdate>20160501</startdate><enddate>20160501</enddate><creator>Wang, Wei</creator><creator>Liu, Zhiwei</creator><creator>Xiong, Wenjun</creator><creator>Zheng, Yansheng</creator><creator>Luo, Lijie</creator><creator>Diao, Dechang</creator><creator>Wan, Jin</creator><general>Springer US</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20160501</creationdate><title>Totally laparoscopic spleen-preserving splenic hilum lymph nodes dissection in radical total gastrectomy: an omnibearing method</title><author>Wang, Wei ; Liu, Zhiwei ; Xiong, Wenjun ; Zheng, Yansheng ; Luo, Lijie ; Diao, Dechang ; Wan, Jin</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c372t-285946bc2c30b23af61eaded1d6489dae2d3101deaf573edc7f9b09559706a83</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Abdominal Surgery</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Carcinoma - surgery</topic><topic>Conversion to Open Surgery</topic><topic>Dissection</topic><topic>Feasibility Studies</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Gastrectomy - methods</topic><topic>Gastric cancer</topic><topic>Gastroenterology</topic><topic>Gastrointestinal surgery</topic><topic>Gynecology</topic><topic>Hepatology</topic><topic>Hospitals</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Intraoperative Complications - surgery</topic><topic>Laparoscopy</topic><topic>Laparoscopy - methods</topic><topic>Length of Stay</topic><topic>Lymph Node Excision - methods</topic><topic>Lymph Nodes - pathology</topic><topic>Lymphatic system</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine &amp; Public Health</topic><topic>Metastasis</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Operative Time</topic><topic>Organ Sparing Treatments</topic><topic>Pancreas</topic><topic>Patients rights</topic><topic>Postoperative Complications - epidemiology</topic><topic>Proctology</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Spleen</topic><topic>Spleen - surgery</topic><topic>Splenic Artery</topic><topic>Splenic Vein - injuries</topic><topic>Splenic Vein - surgery</topic><topic>Stomach Neoplasms - surgery</topic><topic>Surgeons</topic><topic>Surgery</topic><topic>Suture Techniques</topic><topic>Veins &amp; arteries</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Wang, Wei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liu, Zhiwei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xiong, Wenjun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zheng, Yansheng</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Luo, Lijie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Diao, Dechang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wan, Jin</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Surgical endoscopy</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Wang, Wei</au><au>Liu, Zhiwei</au><au>Xiong, Wenjun</au><au>Zheng, Yansheng</au><au>Luo, Lijie</au><au>Diao, Dechang</au><au>Wan, Jin</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Totally laparoscopic spleen-preserving splenic hilum lymph nodes dissection in radical total gastrectomy: an omnibearing method</atitle><jtitle>Surgical endoscopy</jtitle><stitle>Surg Endosc</stitle><addtitle>Surg Endosc</addtitle><date>2016-05-01</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>30</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>2030</spage><epage>2035</epage><pages>2030-2035</pages><issn>0930-2794</issn><eissn>1432-2218</eissn><abstract>Objective To investigate the feasibility and safety of laparoscopic spleen-preserving splenic hilum lymph nodes (LNs) dissection for advanced proximal gastric cancer using an omnibearing method. Methods Between August 2013 and December 2014, 16 patients with advanced proximal gastric cancer treated in Guangdong Province Hospital of Chinese Medicine, were enrolled and subsequently underwent laparoscopic radical total gastrectomy (TG) with spleen-preserving splenic hilum LNs dissection. During dissecting Nos. 10 and 11 LNs, we divided them into two parts, namely LNs anterosuperior and posterior to the splenic vessel. The clinicopathological characteristics, intraoperative outcomes and postoperative courses were retrospectively collected and analyzed in the study. Results Laparoscopic surgery was successfully completed in all 16 patients without conversion to open surgery, and no perioperative death occurred. The mean operating time was 328.75 ± 46.96 min, and the mean estimated blood loss was 135.63 ± 62.07 ml. One patient experienced intraoperative bleeding due to the splenic vein injury which was successfully handled with laparoscopic vessel suturing, and one postoperative pulmonary infection was recorded. The mean time to first flatus was 3.56 ± 1.03 days with a mean 9.63 ± 1.50 days of postoperative hospital stay. The mean number of retrieved LNs was 28.31 ± 5.99, in which LNs anterosuperior to splenic artery was 2.88 ± 2.66 and LNs posterior was 1.38 ± 1.75. Conclusion Laparoscopic TG with spleen-preserving splenic hilum LNs dissection using an omnibearing method for advanced proximal gastric cancer was safe and technically feasible in experienced hands. Further studies in terms of its clinical significance are needed.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Springer US</pub><pmid>26201417</pmid><doi>10.1007/s00464-015-4438-9</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0930-2794
ispartof Surgical endoscopy, 2016-05, Vol.30 (5), p.2030-2035
issn 0930-2794
1432-2218
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1785733644
source MEDLINE; Springer Online Journals Complete
subjects Abdominal Surgery
Aged
Carcinoma - surgery
Conversion to Open Surgery
Dissection
Feasibility Studies
Female
Gastrectomy - methods
Gastric cancer
Gastroenterology
Gastrointestinal surgery
Gynecology
Hepatology
Hospitals
Humans
Intraoperative Complications - surgery
Laparoscopy
Laparoscopy - methods
Length of Stay
Lymph Node Excision - methods
Lymph Nodes - pathology
Lymphatic system
Male
Medicine
Medicine & Public Health
Metastasis
Middle Aged
Operative Time
Organ Sparing Treatments
Pancreas
Patients rights
Postoperative Complications - epidemiology
Proctology
Retrospective Studies
Spleen
Spleen - surgery
Splenic Artery
Splenic Vein - injuries
Splenic Vein - surgery
Stomach Neoplasms - surgery
Surgeons
Surgery
Suture Techniques
Veins & arteries
title Totally laparoscopic spleen-preserving splenic hilum lymph nodes dissection in radical total gastrectomy: an omnibearing method
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-15T13%3A01%3A04IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Totally%20laparoscopic%20spleen-preserving%20splenic%20hilum%20lymph%20nodes%20dissection%20in%20radical%20total%20gastrectomy:%20an%20omnibearing%20method&rft.jtitle=Surgical%20endoscopy&rft.au=Wang,%20Wei&rft.date=2016-05-01&rft.volume=30&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=2030&rft.epage=2035&rft.pages=2030-2035&rft.issn=0930-2794&rft.eissn=1432-2218&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s00464-015-4438-9&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1785733644%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1784673422&rft_id=info:pmid/26201417&rfr_iscdi=true