Stress, Cognitive Appraisal and Psychological Health: Testing Instruments for Health Professionals
The job of health professionals, including nurses, is considered inherently stressful, and thus, it is important to improve and develop specific measures that are sensitive to the demands that health professionals face. This study analysed the psychometric properties of three instruments that focus...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Stress and health 2016-04, Vol.32 (2), p.167-172 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 172 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 2 |
| container_start_page | 167 |
| container_title | Stress and health |
| container_volume | 32 |
| creator | Gomes, A. Rui Teixeira, Pedro M. |
| description | The job of health professionals, including nurses, is considered inherently stressful, and thus, it is important to improve and develop specific measures that are sensitive to the demands that health professionals face. This study analysed the psychometric properties of three instruments that focus on the professional experiences of nurses in aspects related to occupational stress, cognitive appraisal and mental health issues. The evaluation protocol included the Stress Questionnaire for Health Professionals (SQHP), the Cognitive Appraisal Scale (CAS) and the General Health Questionnaire‐12 (GHQ‐12). Validity and reliability issues were considered with statistical analysis (i.e. confirmatory factor analysis, convergent validity and composite reliability) that revealed adequate values for all of the instruments, namely a six‐factor structure for the SQHP, a five‐factor structure for the CAS and a two‐factor structure for the GHQ‐12. In conclusion, this study proposes three consistent instruments that may be useful for analysing nurses' adaptation to work contexts. Copyright © 2014 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1002/smi.2583 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1785246637</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>4015684681</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4793-66179f6bf3e001617b6559b9386012c8d9992ff13788760056fdc0ad85a6691b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkV1rFDEUhoMo9kPBXyAD3njRqSfJ5Mu7smh3ZavFVnoZMjPJNnVmsiYz6v57s3QsIgheneSch4dzeBF6geEUA5A3qfenhEn6CB1iRklJlJKP5zcFYAfoKKU7ABBMyKfogFRSYaD0ENVXY7QpnRSLsBn86L_b4my7jcYn0xVmaIvLtGtuQxc2vsmdpTXdePu2uLZp9MOmWA1pjFNvhzEVLsR5XlzG4LLVh8F06Rl64nKxz-d6jL68f3e9WJbrT-erxdm6bCqhaMk5Fsrx2lELgPOn5oypWlHJAZNGtkop4hymQkrB81HctQ2YVjLDucI1PUav773bGL5NeUHd-9TYrjODDVPSWEhGKs6p-B8UcAVQ8Yy--gu9C1Pc35UpoThRRPwhbGJIKVqnt9H3Ju40Br2PSOeI9D6ijL6chVPd2_YB_J1JBsp74Ifv7O6fIn11sZqFM-_TaH8-8CZ-1VxQwfTNx3N9scRrevOB6M_0FxXWp4I</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1779629277</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Stress, Cognitive Appraisal and Psychological Health: Testing Instruments for Health Professionals</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Gomes, A. Rui ; Teixeira, Pedro M.</creator><creatorcontrib>Gomes, A. Rui ; Teixeira, Pedro M.</creatorcontrib><description>The job of health professionals, including nurses, is considered inherently stressful, and thus, it is important to improve and develop specific measures that are sensitive to the demands that health professionals face. This study analysed the psychometric properties of three instruments that focus on the professional experiences of nurses in aspects related to occupational stress, cognitive appraisal and mental health issues. The evaluation protocol included the Stress Questionnaire for Health Professionals (SQHP), the Cognitive Appraisal Scale (CAS) and the General Health Questionnaire‐12 (GHQ‐12). Validity and reliability issues were considered with statistical analysis (i.e. confirmatory factor analysis, convergent validity and composite reliability) that revealed adequate values for all of the instruments, namely a six‐factor structure for the SQHP, a five‐factor structure for the CAS and a two‐factor structure for the GHQ‐12. In conclusion, this study proposes three consistent instruments that may be useful for analysing nurses' adaptation to work contexts. Copyright © 2014 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1532-3005</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1532-2998</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/smi.2583</identifier><identifier>PMID: 24891033</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Adult ; cognitive appraisal ; Cognitive psychology ; Female ; health ; Humans ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Nurses ; Nurses - psychology ; Occupational Diseases - diagnosis ; Occupational psychology ; Occupational stress ; Psychometrics - instrumentation ; Quantitative psychology ; Reproducibility of Results ; Stress ; Stress, Psychological - diagnosis ; Surveys and Questionnaires - standards ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>Stress and health, 2016-04, Vol.32 (2), p.167-172</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2014 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2016 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4793-66179f6bf3e001617b6559b9386012c8d9992ff13788760056fdc0ad85a6691b3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4793-66179f6bf3e001617b6559b9386012c8d9992ff13788760056fdc0ad85a6691b3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fsmi.2583$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fsmi.2583$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1416,27922,27923,45572,45573</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24891033$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Gomes, A. Rui</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Teixeira, Pedro M.</creatorcontrib><title>Stress, Cognitive Appraisal and Psychological Health: Testing Instruments for Health Professionals</title><title>Stress and health</title><addtitle>Stress Health</addtitle><description>The job of health professionals, including nurses, is considered inherently stressful, and thus, it is important to improve and develop specific measures that are sensitive to the demands that health professionals face. This study analysed the psychometric properties of three instruments that focus on the professional experiences of nurses in aspects related to occupational stress, cognitive appraisal and mental health issues. The evaluation protocol included the Stress Questionnaire for Health Professionals (SQHP), the Cognitive Appraisal Scale (CAS) and the General Health Questionnaire‐12 (GHQ‐12). Validity and reliability issues were considered with statistical analysis (i.e. confirmatory factor analysis, convergent validity and composite reliability) that revealed adequate values for all of the instruments, namely a six‐factor structure for the SQHP, a five‐factor structure for the CAS and a two‐factor structure for the GHQ‐12. In conclusion, this study proposes three consistent instruments that may be useful for analysing nurses' adaptation to work contexts. Copyright © 2014 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>cognitive appraisal</subject><subject>Cognitive psychology</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>health</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Nurses</subject><subject>Nurses - psychology</subject><subject>Occupational Diseases - diagnosis</subject><subject>Occupational psychology</subject><subject>Occupational stress</subject><subject>Psychometrics - instrumentation</subject><subject>Quantitative psychology</subject><subject>Reproducibility of Results</subject><subject>Stress</subject><subject>Stress, Psychological - diagnosis</subject><subject>Surveys and Questionnaires - standards</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>1532-3005</issn><issn>1532-2998</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkV1rFDEUhoMo9kPBXyAD3njRqSfJ5Mu7smh3ZavFVnoZMjPJNnVmsiYz6v57s3QsIgheneSch4dzeBF6geEUA5A3qfenhEn6CB1iRklJlJKP5zcFYAfoKKU7ABBMyKfogFRSYaD0ENVXY7QpnRSLsBn86L_b4my7jcYn0xVmaIvLtGtuQxc2vsmdpTXdePu2uLZp9MOmWA1pjFNvhzEVLsR5XlzG4LLVh8F06Rl64nKxz-d6jL68f3e9WJbrT-erxdm6bCqhaMk5Fsrx2lELgPOn5oypWlHJAZNGtkop4hymQkrB81HctQ2YVjLDucI1PUav773bGL5NeUHd-9TYrjODDVPSWEhGKs6p-B8UcAVQ8Yy--gu9C1Pc35UpoThRRPwhbGJIKVqnt9H3Ju40Br2PSOeI9D6ijL6chVPd2_YB_J1JBsp74Ifv7O6fIn11sZqFM-_TaH8-8CZ-1VxQwfTNx3N9scRrevOB6M_0FxXWp4I</recordid><startdate>201604</startdate><enddate>201604</enddate><creator>Gomes, A. Rui</creator><creator>Teixeira, Pedro M.</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7TS</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>7T2</scope><scope>7U2</scope><scope>C1K</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201604</creationdate><title>Stress, Cognitive Appraisal and Psychological Health: Testing Instruments for Health Professionals</title><author>Gomes, A. Rui ; Teixeira, Pedro M.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4793-66179f6bf3e001617b6559b9386012c8d9992ff13788760056fdc0ad85a6691b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>cognitive appraisal</topic><topic>Cognitive psychology</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>health</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Nurses</topic><topic>Nurses - psychology</topic><topic>Occupational Diseases - diagnosis</topic><topic>Occupational psychology</topic><topic>Occupational stress</topic><topic>Psychometrics - instrumentation</topic><topic>Quantitative psychology</topic><topic>Reproducibility of Results</topic><topic>Stress</topic><topic>Stress, Psychological - diagnosis</topic><topic>Surveys and Questionnaires - standards</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Gomes, A. Rui</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Teixeira, Pedro M.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Physical Education Index</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Health and Safety Science Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Safety Science and Risk</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><jtitle>Stress and health</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Gomes, A. Rui</au><au>Teixeira, Pedro M.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Stress, Cognitive Appraisal and Psychological Health: Testing Instruments for Health Professionals</atitle><jtitle>Stress and health</jtitle><addtitle>Stress Health</addtitle><date>2016-04</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>32</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>167</spage><epage>172</epage><pages>167-172</pages><issn>1532-3005</issn><eissn>1532-2998</eissn><abstract>The job of health professionals, including nurses, is considered inherently stressful, and thus, it is important to improve and develop specific measures that are sensitive to the demands that health professionals face. This study analysed the psychometric properties of three instruments that focus on the professional experiences of nurses in aspects related to occupational stress, cognitive appraisal and mental health issues. The evaluation protocol included the Stress Questionnaire for Health Professionals (SQHP), the Cognitive Appraisal Scale (CAS) and the General Health Questionnaire‐12 (GHQ‐12). Validity and reliability issues were considered with statistical analysis (i.e. confirmatory factor analysis, convergent validity and composite reliability) that revealed adequate values for all of the instruments, namely a six‐factor structure for the SQHP, a five‐factor structure for the CAS and a two‐factor structure for the GHQ‐12. In conclusion, this study proposes three consistent instruments that may be useful for analysing nurses' adaptation to work contexts. Copyright © 2014 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><pmid>24891033</pmid><doi>10.1002/smi.2583</doi><tpages>6</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 1532-3005 |
| ispartof | Stress and health, 2016-04, Vol.32 (2), p.167-172 |
| issn | 1532-3005 1532-2998 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1785246637 |
| source | MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete |
| subjects | Adult cognitive appraisal Cognitive psychology Female health Humans Male Middle Aged Nurses Nurses - psychology Occupational Diseases - diagnosis Occupational psychology Occupational stress Psychometrics - instrumentation Quantitative psychology Reproducibility of Results Stress Stress, Psychological - diagnosis Surveys and Questionnaires - standards Young Adult |
| title | Stress, Cognitive Appraisal and Psychological Health: Testing Instruments for Health Professionals |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-13T17%3A55%3A43IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Stress,%20Cognitive%20Appraisal%20and%20Psychological%20Health:%20Testing%20Instruments%20for%20Health%20Professionals&rft.jtitle=Stress%20and%20health&rft.au=Gomes,%20A.%20Rui&rft.date=2016-04&rft.volume=32&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=167&rft.epage=172&rft.pages=167-172&rft.issn=1532-3005&rft.eissn=1532-2998&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/smi.2583&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E4015684681%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1779629277&rft_id=info:pmid/24891033&rfr_iscdi=true |