Use of marine protected areas and exclusive economic zones in the subtropical western North Atlantic Ocean by large highly mobile sharks
Study aim and location Many populations of highly mobile marine fishes, including large sharks, are experiencing declines. The benefits of spatial management zones, such as marine protected areas (MPAs), for such animals are unclear. To help fill this knowledge gap, we examined core habitat use area...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Diversity & distributions 2016-05, Vol.22 (5), p.534-546 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext bestellen |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 546 |
---|---|
container_issue | 5 |
container_start_page | 534 |
container_title | Diversity & distributions |
container_volume | 22 |
creator | Graham, Fiona Rynne, Patrick Estevanez, Maria Luo, Jiangang Ault, Jerald S. Hammerschlag, Neil |
description | Study aim and location Many populations of highly mobile marine fishes, including large sharks, are experiencing declines. The benefits of spatial management zones, such as marine protected areas (MPAs), for such animals are unclear. To help fill this knowledge gap, we examined core habitat use areas (CHUAs) for bull (Carcharhinus leucas), great hammerhead (Sphyrna mokarran) and tiger sharks (Galeocerdo cuvier) in relation to specific MPAs and exclusive economic zones (EEZs) in the western North Atlantic Ocean. Methods Bull, great hammerhead and tiger sharks (N = 86 total) were satellite tagged and tracked in southern Florida and the northern Bahamas between 2010 and 2013. Filtered and regularized positions from Argos locations of tag transmissions were used to generate CHUAs for these sharks. Overlaps of CHUAs with regional protected areas and exclusive economic management zones were quantified to determine the proportion of each tracked shark's CHUA under spatial protection from exploitation. Results A total of 0%, 17.9% and 34.7% of the regional CHUAs for tracked bull, great hammerhead and tiger sharks, respectively, were fully protected from exploitation in the study area. Main conclusions Expansion of protected areas to include U.S. territorial waters would effectively protect 100% of the CHUAs for all tracked sharks in the study area. This finding is particularly significant for great hammerhead sharks, which are currently overfished, vulnerable to bycatch mortality and are the focus of strident regional conservation efforts. These findings also provide a means to inform decision makers and marine conservation planning efforts as to the types of management actions available and potential efficacy of spatial protections for these marine predators. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/ddi.12425 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_24P</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1785245322</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>24817488</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>24817488</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4255-482ae154288c18813b16ecb6e7406930c86ee3e5d9da64d77d5208bed77717ff3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kc9u1DAQxiMEEqVw4AGQLHGBQ1r_jZ1jtQulVdUiQcXRcpxJ4yUbb-2EdnkCHpuBQA9I-DIjze-zvvmmKF4yesTwHbdtOGJccvWoOGBS81JWkj_GXlRVWStWPS2e5byhlAqh-EHx4zoDiR3ZuhRGILsUJ_ATtMQlcJm4sSVw74c5h29AwMcxboMn3-MImYSRTD2QPDdTirvg3UDuIE-QRnIZ09STk2lw44T8lQc3kmZPBpdugPThph_2ZBubMKC-d-lrfl486dyQ4cWfelhcv3_3efWhvLg6PVudXJQel1KlNNwBU5Ib45kxTDSsAt9UoCWtakG9qQAEqLZuXSVbrVvFqWkAO81014nD4s3yL656O6Nduw3Zw4BOIc7ZMm0Ul0pwjujrf9BNnNOI7pDStTY1NRSptwvlU8w5QWd3KWCce8uo_XUTizexv2-C7PHC3uHi-_-Ddr0--6t4tSg2eYrpQcGlYVoag_NymQcM_v5hjonaSgut7JfLU3teq9XHtTm3n8RPDNinCg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1779789080</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Use of marine protected areas and exclusive economic zones in the subtropical western North Atlantic Ocean by large highly mobile sharks</title><source>Wiley Online Library (Open Access Collection)</source><creator>Graham, Fiona ; Rynne, Patrick ; Estevanez, Maria ; Luo, Jiangang ; Ault, Jerald S. ; Hammerschlag, Neil</creator><contributor>Schoeman, David ; Schoeman, David</contributor><creatorcontrib>Graham, Fiona ; Rynne, Patrick ; Estevanez, Maria ; Luo, Jiangang ; Ault, Jerald S. ; Hammerschlag, Neil ; Schoeman, David ; Schoeman, David</creatorcontrib><description>Study aim and location Many populations of highly mobile marine fishes, including large sharks, are experiencing declines. The benefits of spatial management zones, such as marine protected areas (MPAs), for such animals are unclear. To help fill this knowledge gap, we examined core habitat use areas (CHUAs) for bull (Carcharhinus leucas), great hammerhead (Sphyrna mokarran) and tiger sharks (Galeocerdo cuvier) in relation to specific MPAs and exclusive economic zones (EEZs) in the western North Atlantic Ocean. Methods Bull, great hammerhead and tiger sharks (N = 86 total) were satellite tagged and tracked in southern Florida and the northern Bahamas between 2010 and 2013. Filtered and regularized positions from Argos locations of tag transmissions were used to generate CHUAs for these sharks. Overlaps of CHUAs with regional protected areas and exclusive economic management zones were quantified to determine the proportion of each tracked shark's CHUA under spatial protection from exploitation. Results A total of 0%, 17.9% and 34.7% of the regional CHUAs for tracked bull, great hammerhead and tiger sharks, respectively, were fully protected from exploitation in the study area. Main conclusions Expansion of protected areas to include U.S. territorial waters would effectively protect 100% of the CHUAs for all tracked sharks in the study area. This finding is particularly significant for great hammerhead sharks, which are currently overfished, vulnerable to bycatch mortality and are the focus of strident regional conservation efforts. These findings also provide a means to inform decision makers and marine conservation planning efforts as to the types of management actions available and potential efficacy of spatial protections for these marine predators.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1366-9516</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1472-4642</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/ddi.12425</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>BIODIVERSITY RESEARCH ; Biotelemetry ; Brackish ; Carcharhinus leucas ; Conservation ; fishes ; Galeocerdo cuvier ; habitat use ; Marine ; Marine conservation ; Marine ecology ; place-based management ; Sharks ; Sphyrna mokarran ; sustainability</subject><ispartof>Diversity & distributions, 2016-05, Vol.22 (5), p.534-546</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2015 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.</rights><rights>2016 John Wiley & Sons Ltd</rights><rights>Copyright © 2016 John Wiley & Sons Ltd</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4255-482ae154288c18813b16ecb6e7406930c86ee3e5d9da64d77d5208bed77717ff3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4255-482ae154288c18813b16ecb6e7406930c86ee3e5d9da64d77d5208bed77717ff3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/24817488$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/24817488$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,803,1417,11562,27924,27925,45574,45575,46052,46476,58017,58250</link.rule.ids><linktorsrc>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111%2Fddi.12425$$EView_record_in_Wiley-Blackwell$$FView_record_in_$$GWiley-Blackwell</linktorsrc></links><search><contributor>Schoeman, David</contributor><contributor>Schoeman, David</contributor><creatorcontrib>Graham, Fiona</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rynne, Patrick</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Estevanez, Maria</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Luo, Jiangang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ault, Jerald S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hammerschlag, Neil</creatorcontrib><title>Use of marine protected areas and exclusive economic zones in the subtropical western North Atlantic Ocean by large highly mobile sharks</title><title>Diversity & distributions</title><addtitle>Diversity Distrib</addtitle><description>Study aim and location Many populations of highly mobile marine fishes, including large sharks, are experiencing declines. The benefits of spatial management zones, such as marine protected areas (MPAs), for such animals are unclear. To help fill this knowledge gap, we examined core habitat use areas (CHUAs) for bull (Carcharhinus leucas), great hammerhead (Sphyrna mokarran) and tiger sharks (Galeocerdo cuvier) in relation to specific MPAs and exclusive economic zones (EEZs) in the western North Atlantic Ocean. Methods Bull, great hammerhead and tiger sharks (N = 86 total) were satellite tagged and tracked in southern Florida and the northern Bahamas between 2010 and 2013. Filtered and regularized positions from Argos locations of tag transmissions were used to generate CHUAs for these sharks. Overlaps of CHUAs with regional protected areas and exclusive economic management zones were quantified to determine the proportion of each tracked shark's CHUA under spatial protection from exploitation. Results A total of 0%, 17.9% and 34.7% of the regional CHUAs for tracked bull, great hammerhead and tiger sharks, respectively, were fully protected from exploitation in the study area. Main conclusions Expansion of protected areas to include U.S. territorial waters would effectively protect 100% of the CHUAs for all tracked sharks in the study area. This finding is particularly significant for great hammerhead sharks, which are currently overfished, vulnerable to bycatch mortality and are the focus of strident regional conservation efforts. These findings also provide a means to inform decision makers and marine conservation planning efforts as to the types of management actions available and potential efficacy of spatial protections for these marine predators.</description><subject>BIODIVERSITY RESEARCH</subject><subject>Biotelemetry</subject><subject>Brackish</subject><subject>Carcharhinus leucas</subject><subject>Conservation</subject><subject>fishes</subject><subject>Galeocerdo cuvier</subject><subject>habitat use</subject><subject>Marine</subject><subject>Marine conservation</subject><subject>Marine ecology</subject><subject>place-based management</subject><subject>Sharks</subject><subject>Sphyrna mokarran</subject><subject>sustainability</subject><issn>1366-9516</issn><issn>1472-4642</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kc9u1DAQxiMEEqVw4AGQLHGBQ1r_jZ1jtQulVdUiQcXRcpxJ4yUbb-2EdnkCHpuBQA9I-DIjze-zvvmmKF4yesTwHbdtOGJccvWoOGBS81JWkj_GXlRVWStWPS2e5byhlAqh-EHx4zoDiR3ZuhRGILsUJ_ATtMQlcJm4sSVw74c5h29AwMcxboMn3-MImYSRTD2QPDdTirvg3UDuIE-QRnIZ09STk2lw44T8lQc3kmZPBpdugPThph_2ZBubMKC-d-lrfl486dyQ4cWfelhcv3_3efWhvLg6PVudXJQel1KlNNwBU5Ib45kxTDSsAt9UoCWtakG9qQAEqLZuXSVbrVvFqWkAO81014nD4s3yL656O6Nduw3Zw4BOIc7ZMm0Ul0pwjujrf9BNnNOI7pDStTY1NRSptwvlU8w5QWd3KWCce8uo_XUTizexv2-C7PHC3uHi-_-Ddr0--6t4tSg2eYrpQcGlYVoag_NymQcM_v5hjonaSgut7JfLU3teq9XHtTm3n8RPDNinCg</recordid><startdate>201605</startdate><enddate>201605</enddate><creator>Graham, Fiona</creator><creator>Rynne, Patrick</creator><creator>Estevanez, Maria</creator><creator>Luo, Jiangang</creator><creator>Ault, Jerald S.</creator><creator>Hammerschlag, Neil</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><general>John Wiley & Sons Ltd</general><general>John Wiley & Sons, Inc</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7TN</scope><scope>7U6</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>H95</scope><scope>L.G</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201605</creationdate><title>Use of marine protected areas and exclusive economic zones in the subtropical western North Atlantic Ocean by large highly mobile sharks</title><author>Graham, Fiona ; Rynne, Patrick ; Estevanez, Maria ; Luo, Jiangang ; Ault, Jerald S. ; Hammerschlag, Neil</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4255-482ae154288c18813b16ecb6e7406930c86ee3e5d9da64d77d5208bed77717ff3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>BIODIVERSITY RESEARCH</topic><topic>Biotelemetry</topic><topic>Brackish</topic><topic>Carcharhinus leucas</topic><topic>Conservation</topic><topic>fishes</topic><topic>Galeocerdo cuvier</topic><topic>habitat use</topic><topic>Marine</topic><topic>Marine conservation</topic><topic>Marine ecology</topic><topic>place-based management</topic><topic>Sharks</topic><topic>Sphyrna mokarran</topic><topic>sustainability</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Graham, Fiona</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rynne, Patrick</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Estevanez, Maria</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Luo, Jiangang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ault, Jerald S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hammerschlag, Neil</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Oceanic Abstracts</collection><collection>Sustainability Science Abstracts</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 1: Biological Sciences & Living Resources</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><jtitle>Diversity & distributions</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext_linktorsrc</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Graham, Fiona</au><au>Rynne, Patrick</au><au>Estevanez, Maria</au><au>Luo, Jiangang</au><au>Ault, Jerald S.</au><au>Hammerschlag, Neil</au><au>Schoeman, David</au><au>Schoeman, David</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Use of marine protected areas and exclusive economic zones in the subtropical western North Atlantic Ocean by large highly mobile sharks</atitle><jtitle>Diversity & distributions</jtitle><addtitle>Diversity Distrib</addtitle><date>2016-05</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>22</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>534</spage><epage>546</epage><pages>534-546</pages><issn>1366-9516</issn><eissn>1472-4642</eissn><abstract>Study aim and location Many populations of highly mobile marine fishes, including large sharks, are experiencing declines. The benefits of spatial management zones, such as marine protected areas (MPAs), for such animals are unclear. To help fill this knowledge gap, we examined core habitat use areas (CHUAs) for bull (Carcharhinus leucas), great hammerhead (Sphyrna mokarran) and tiger sharks (Galeocerdo cuvier) in relation to specific MPAs and exclusive economic zones (EEZs) in the western North Atlantic Ocean. Methods Bull, great hammerhead and tiger sharks (N = 86 total) were satellite tagged and tracked in southern Florida and the northern Bahamas between 2010 and 2013. Filtered and regularized positions from Argos locations of tag transmissions were used to generate CHUAs for these sharks. Overlaps of CHUAs with regional protected areas and exclusive economic management zones were quantified to determine the proportion of each tracked shark's CHUA under spatial protection from exploitation. Results A total of 0%, 17.9% and 34.7% of the regional CHUAs for tracked bull, great hammerhead and tiger sharks, respectively, were fully protected from exploitation in the study area. Main conclusions Expansion of protected areas to include U.S. territorial waters would effectively protect 100% of the CHUAs for all tracked sharks in the study area. This finding is particularly significant for great hammerhead sharks, which are currently overfished, vulnerable to bycatch mortality and are the focus of strident regional conservation efforts. These findings also provide a means to inform decision makers and marine conservation planning efforts as to the types of management actions available and potential efficacy of spatial protections for these marine predators.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><doi>10.1111/ddi.12425</doi><tpages>13</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext_linktorsrc |
identifier | ISSN: 1366-9516 |
ispartof | Diversity & distributions, 2016-05, Vol.22 (5), p.534-546 |
issn | 1366-9516 1472-4642 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1785245322 |
source | Wiley Online Library (Open Access Collection) |
subjects | BIODIVERSITY RESEARCH Biotelemetry Brackish Carcharhinus leucas Conservation fishes Galeocerdo cuvier habitat use Marine Marine conservation Marine ecology place-based management Sharks Sphyrna mokarran sustainability |
title | Use of marine protected areas and exclusive economic zones in the subtropical western North Atlantic Ocean by large highly mobile sharks |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-29T19%3A30%3A27IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_24P&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Use%20of%20marine%20protected%20areas%20and%20exclusive%20economic%20zones%20in%20the%20subtropical%20western%20North%20Atlantic%20Ocean%20by%20large%20highly%20mobile%20sharks&rft.jtitle=Diversity%20&%20distributions&rft.au=Graham,%20Fiona&rft.date=2016-05&rft.volume=22&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=534&rft.epage=546&rft.pages=534-546&rft.issn=1366-9516&rft.eissn=1472-4642&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/ddi.12425&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_24P%3E24817488%3C/jstor_24P%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1779789080&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=24817488&rfr_iscdi=true |