Use of marine protected areas and exclusive economic zones in the subtropical western North Atlantic Ocean by large highly mobile sharks

Study aim and location Many populations of highly mobile marine fishes, including large sharks, are experiencing declines. The benefits of spatial management zones, such as marine protected areas (MPAs), for such animals are unclear. To help fill this knowledge gap, we examined core habitat use area...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Diversity & distributions 2016-05, Vol.22 (5), p.534-546
Hauptverfasser: Graham, Fiona, Rynne, Patrick, Estevanez, Maria, Luo, Jiangang, Ault, Jerald S., Hammerschlag, Neil
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext bestellen
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 546
container_issue 5
container_start_page 534
container_title Diversity & distributions
container_volume 22
creator Graham, Fiona
Rynne, Patrick
Estevanez, Maria
Luo, Jiangang
Ault, Jerald S.
Hammerschlag, Neil
description Study aim and location Many populations of highly mobile marine fishes, including large sharks, are experiencing declines. The benefits of spatial management zones, such as marine protected areas (MPAs), for such animals are unclear. To help fill this knowledge gap, we examined core habitat use areas (CHUAs) for bull (Carcharhinus leucas), great hammerhead (Sphyrna mokarran) and tiger sharks (Galeocerdo cuvier) in relation to specific MPAs and exclusive economic zones (EEZs) in the western North Atlantic Ocean. Methods Bull, great hammerhead and tiger sharks (N = 86 total) were satellite tagged and tracked in southern Florida and the northern Bahamas between 2010 and 2013. Filtered and regularized positions from Argos locations of tag transmissions were used to generate CHUAs for these sharks. Overlaps of CHUAs with regional protected areas and exclusive economic management zones were quantified to determine the proportion of each tracked shark's CHUA under spatial protection from exploitation. Results A total of 0%, 17.9% and 34.7% of the regional CHUAs for tracked bull, great hammerhead and tiger sharks, respectively, were fully protected from exploitation in the study area. Main conclusions Expansion of protected areas to include U.S. territorial waters would effectively protect 100% of the CHUAs for all tracked sharks in the study area. This finding is particularly significant for great hammerhead sharks, which are currently overfished, vulnerable to bycatch mortality and are the focus of strident regional conservation efforts. These findings also provide a means to inform decision makers and marine conservation planning efforts as to the types of management actions available and potential efficacy of spatial protections for these marine predators.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/ddi.12425
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_24P</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1785245322</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>24817488</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>24817488</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4255-482ae154288c18813b16ecb6e7406930c86ee3e5d9da64d77d5208bed77717ff3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kc9u1DAQxiMEEqVw4AGQLHGBQ1r_jZ1jtQulVdUiQcXRcpxJ4yUbb-2EdnkCHpuBQA9I-DIjze-zvvmmKF4yesTwHbdtOGJccvWoOGBS81JWkj_GXlRVWStWPS2e5byhlAqh-EHx4zoDiR3ZuhRGILsUJ_ATtMQlcJm4sSVw74c5h29AwMcxboMn3-MImYSRTD2QPDdTirvg3UDuIE-QRnIZ09STk2lw44T8lQc3kmZPBpdugPThph_2ZBubMKC-d-lrfl486dyQ4cWfelhcv3_3efWhvLg6PVudXJQel1KlNNwBU5Ib45kxTDSsAt9UoCWtakG9qQAEqLZuXSVbrVvFqWkAO81014nD4s3yL656O6Nduw3Zw4BOIc7ZMm0Ul0pwjujrf9BNnNOI7pDStTY1NRSptwvlU8w5QWd3KWCce8uo_XUTizexv2-C7PHC3uHi-_-Ddr0--6t4tSg2eYrpQcGlYVoag_NymQcM_v5hjonaSgut7JfLU3teq9XHtTm3n8RPDNinCg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1779789080</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Use of marine protected areas and exclusive economic zones in the subtropical western North Atlantic Ocean by large highly mobile sharks</title><source>Wiley Online Library (Open Access Collection)</source><creator>Graham, Fiona ; Rynne, Patrick ; Estevanez, Maria ; Luo, Jiangang ; Ault, Jerald S. ; Hammerschlag, Neil</creator><contributor>Schoeman, David ; Schoeman, David</contributor><creatorcontrib>Graham, Fiona ; Rynne, Patrick ; Estevanez, Maria ; Luo, Jiangang ; Ault, Jerald S. ; Hammerschlag, Neil ; Schoeman, David ; Schoeman, David</creatorcontrib><description>Study aim and location Many populations of highly mobile marine fishes, including large sharks, are experiencing declines. The benefits of spatial management zones, such as marine protected areas (MPAs), for such animals are unclear. To help fill this knowledge gap, we examined core habitat use areas (CHUAs) for bull (Carcharhinus leucas), great hammerhead (Sphyrna mokarran) and tiger sharks (Galeocerdo cuvier) in relation to specific MPAs and exclusive economic zones (EEZs) in the western North Atlantic Ocean. Methods Bull, great hammerhead and tiger sharks (N = 86 total) were satellite tagged and tracked in southern Florida and the northern Bahamas between 2010 and 2013. Filtered and regularized positions from Argos locations of tag transmissions were used to generate CHUAs for these sharks. Overlaps of CHUAs with regional protected areas and exclusive economic management zones were quantified to determine the proportion of each tracked shark's CHUA under spatial protection from exploitation. Results A total of 0%, 17.9% and 34.7% of the regional CHUAs for tracked bull, great hammerhead and tiger sharks, respectively, were fully protected from exploitation in the study area. Main conclusions Expansion of protected areas to include U.S. territorial waters would effectively protect 100% of the CHUAs for all tracked sharks in the study area. This finding is particularly significant for great hammerhead sharks, which are currently overfished, vulnerable to bycatch mortality and are the focus of strident regional conservation efforts. These findings also provide a means to inform decision makers and marine conservation planning efforts as to the types of management actions available and potential efficacy of spatial protections for these marine predators.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1366-9516</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1472-4642</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/ddi.12425</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>BIODIVERSITY RESEARCH ; Biotelemetry ; Brackish ; Carcharhinus leucas ; Conservation ; fishes ; Galeocerdo cuvier ; habitat use ; Marine ; Marine conservation ; Marine ecology ; place-based management ; Sharks ; Sphyrna mokarran ; sustainability</subject><ispartof>Diversity &amp; distributions, 2016-05, Vol.22 (5), p.534-546</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2015 John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd.</rights><rights>2016 John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd</rights><rights>Copyright © 2016 John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4255-482ae154288c18813b16ecb6e7406930c86ee3e5d9da64d77d5208bed77717ff3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4255-482ae154288c18813b16ecb6e7406930c86ee3e5d9da64d77d5208bed77717ff3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/24817488$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/24817488$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,803,1417,11562,27924,27925,45574,45575,46052,46476,58017,58250</link.rule.ids><linktorsrc>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111%2Fddi.12425$$EView_record_in_Wiley-Blackwell$$FView_record_in_$$GWiley-Blackwell</linktorsrc></links><search><contributor>Schoeman, David</contributor><contributor>Schoeman, David</contributor><creatorcontrib>Graham, Fiona</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rynne, Patrick</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Estevanez, Maria</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Luo, Jiangang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ault, Jerald S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hammerschlag, Neil</creatorcontrib><title>Use of marine protected areas and exclusive economic zones in the subtropical western North Atlantic Ocean by large highly mobile sharks</title><title>Diversity &amp; distributions</title><addtitle>Diversity Distrib</addtitle><description>Study aim and location Many populations of highly mobile marine fishes, including large sharks, are experiencing declines. The benefits of spatial management zones, such as marine protected areas (MPAs), for such animals are unclear. To help fill this knowledge gap, we examined core habitat use areas (CHUAs) for bull (Carcharhinus leucas), great hammerhead (Sphyrna mokarran) and tiger sharks (Galeocerdo cuvier) in relation to specific MPAs and exclusive economic zones (EEZs) in the western North Atlantic Ocean. Methods Bull, great hammerhead and tiger sharks (N = 86 total) were satellite tagged and tracked in southern Florida and the northern Bahamas between 2010 and 2013. Filtered and regularized positions from Argos locations of tag transmissions were used to generate CHUAs for these sharks. Overlaps of CHUAs with regional protected areas and exclusive economic management zones were quantified to determine the proportion of each tracked shark's CHUA under spatial protection from exploitation. Results A total of 0%, 17.9% and 34.7% of the regional CHUAs for tracked bull, great hammerhead and tiger sharks, respectively, were fully protected from exploitation in the study area. Main conclusions Expansion of protected areas to include U.S. territorial waters would effectively protect 100% of the CHUAs for all tracked sharks in the study area. This finding is particularly significant for great hammerhead sharks, which are currently overfished, vulnerable to bycatch mortality and are the focus of strident regional conservation efforts. These findings also provide a means to inform decision makers and marine conservation planning efforts as to the types of management actions available and potential efficacy of spatial protections for these marine predators.</description><subject>BIODIVERSITY RESEARCH</subject><subject>Biotelemetry</subject><subject>Brackish</subject><subject>Carcharhinus leucas</subject><subject>Conservation</subject><subject>fishes</subject><subject>Galeocerdo cuvier</subject><subject>habitat use</subject><subject>Marine</subject><subject>Marine conservation</subject><subject>Marine ecology</subject><subject>place-based management</subject><subject>Sharks</subject><subject>Sphyrna mokarran</subject><subject>sustainability</subject><issn>1366-9516</issn><issn>1472-4642</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kc9u1DAQxiMEEqVw4AGQLHGBQ1r_jZ1jtQulVdUiQcXRcpxJ4yUbb-2EdnkCHpuBQA9I-DIjze-zvvmmKF4yesTwHbdtOGJccvWoOGBS81JWkj_GXlRVWStWPS2e5byhlAqh-EHx4zoDiR3ZuhRGILsUJ_ATtMQlcJm4sSVw74c5h29AwMcxboMn3-MImYSRTD2QPDdTirvg3UDuIE-QRnIZ09STk2lw44T8lQc3kmZPBpdugPThph_2ZBubMKC-d-lrfl486dyQ4cWfelhcv3_3efWhvLg6PVudXJQel1KlNNwBU5Ib45kxTDSsAt9UoCWtakG9qQAEqLZuXSVbrVvFqWkAO81014nD4s3yL656O6Nduw3Zw4BOIc7ZMm0Ul0pwjujrf9BNnNOI7pDStTY1NRSptwvlU8w5QWd3KWCce8uo_XUTizexv2-C7PHC3uHi-_-Ddr0--6t4tSg2eYrpQcGlYVoag_NymQcM_v5hjonaSgut7JfLU3teq9XHtTm3n8RPDNinCg</recordid><startdate>201605</startdate><enddate>201605</enddate><creator>Graham, Fiona</creator><creator>Rynne, Patrick</creator><creator>Estevanez, Maria</creator><creator>Luo, Jiangang</creator><creator>Ault, Jerald S.</creator><creator>Hammerschlag, Neil</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><general>John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd</general><general>John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7TN</scope><scope>7U6</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>H95</scope><scope>L.G</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201605</creationdate><title>Use of marine protected areas and exclusive economic zones in the subtropical western North Atlantic Ocean by large highly mobile sharks</title><author>Graham, Fiona ; Rynne, Patrick ; Estevanez, Maria ; Luo, Jiangang ; Ault, Jerald S. ; Hammerschlag, Neil</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4255-482ae154288c18813b16ecb6e7406930c86ee3e5d9da64d77d5208bed77717ff3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>BIODIVERSITY RESEARCH</topic><topic>Biotelemetry</topic><topic>Brackish</topic><topic>Carcharhinus leucas</topic><topic>Conservation</topic><topic>fishes</topic><topic>Galeocerdo cuvier</topic><topic>habitat use</topic><topic>Marine</topic><topic>Marine conservation</topic><topic>Marine ecology</topic><topic>place-based management</topic><topic>Sharks</topic><topic>Sphyrna mokarran</topic><topic>sustainability</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Graham, Fiona</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rynne, Patrick</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Estevanez, Maria</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Luo, Jiangang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ault, Jerald S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hammerschlag, Neil</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Oceanic Abstracts</collection><collection>Sustainability Science Abstracts</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 1: Biological Sciences &amp; Living Resources</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><jtitle>Diversity &amp; distributions</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext_linktorsrc</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Graham, Fiona</au><au>Rynne, Patrick</au><au>Estevanez, Maria</au><au>Luo, Jiangang</au><au>Ault, Jerald S.</au><au>Hammerschlag, Neil</au><au>Schoeman, David</au><au>Schoeman, David</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Use of marine protected areas and exclusive economic zones in the subtropical western North Atlantic Ocean by large highly mobile sharks</atitle><jtitle>Diversity &amp; distributions</jtitle><addtitle>Diversity Distrib</addtitle><date>2016-05</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>22</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>534</spage><epage>546</epage><pages>534-546</pages><issn>1366-9516</issn><eissn>1472-4642</eissn><abstract>Study aim and location Many populations of highly mobile marine fishes, including large sharks, are experiencing declines. The benefits of spatial management zones, such as marine protected areas (MPAs), for such animals are unclear. To help fill this knowledge gap, we examined core habitat use areas (CHUAs) for bull (Carcharhinus leucas), great hammerhead (Sphyrna mokarran) and tiger sharks (Galeocerdo cuvier) in relation to specific MPAs and exclusive economic zones (EEZs) in the western North Atlantic Ocean. Methods Bull, great hammerhead and tiger sharks (N = 86 total) were satellite tagged and tracked in southern Florida and the northern Bahamas between 2010 and 2013. Filtered and regularized positions from Argos locations of tag transmissions were used to generate CHUAs for these sharks. Overlaps of CHUAs with regional protected areas and exclusive economic management zones were quantified to determine the proportion of each tracked shark's CHUA under spatial protection from exploitation. Results A total of 0%, 17.9% and 34.7% of the regional CHUAs for tracked bull, great hammerhead and tiger sharks, respectively, were fully protected from exploitation in the study area. Main conclusions Expansion of protected areas to include U.S. territorial waters would effectively protect 100% of the CHUAs for all tracked sharks in the study area. This finding is particularly significant for great hammerhead sharks, which are currently overfished, vulnerable to bycatch mortality and are the focus of strident regional conservation efforts. These findings also provide a means to inform decision makers and marine conservation planning efforts as to the types of management actions available and potential efficacy of spatial protections for these marine predators.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><doi>10.1111/ddi.12425</doi><tpages>13</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext_linktorsrc
identifier ISSN: 1366-9516
ispartof Diversity & distributions, 2016-05, Vol.22 (5), p.534-546
issn 1366-9516
1472-4642
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1785245322
source Wiley Online Library (Open Access Collection)
subjects BIODIVERSITY RESEARCH
Biotelemetry
Brackish
Carcharhinus leucas
Conservation
fishes
Galeocerdo cuvier
habitat use
Marine
Marine conservation
Marine ecology
place-based management
Sharks
Sphyrna mokarran
sustainability
title Use of marine protected areas and exclusive economic zones in the subtropical western North Atlantic Ocean by large highly mobile sharks
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-29T19%3A30%3A27IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_24P&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Use%20of%20marine%20protected%20areas%20and%20exclusive%20economic%20zones%20in%20the%20subtropical%20western%20North%20Atlantic%20Ocean%20by%20large%20highly%20mobile%20sharks&rft.jtitle=Diversity%20&%20distributions&rft.au=Graham,%20Fiona&rft.date=2016-05&rft.volume=22&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=534&rft.epage=546&rft.pages=534-546&rft.issn=1366-9516&rft.eissn=1472-4642&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/ddi.12425&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_24P%3E24817488%3C/jstor_24P%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1779789080&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=24817488&rfr_iscdi=true