Normative rearfoot motion during barefoot and shod walking using biplane fluoroscopy

Purpose The ankle rearfoot complex consists of the ankle and subtalar joints. This is an observational study on two test conditions of the rearfoot complex. Using high-speed biplane fluoroscopy, we present a method to measure rearfoot kinematics during normal gait and compare rearfoot kinematics bet...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA, 2016-04, Vol.24 (4), p.1402-1408
Hauptverfasser: Campbell, Kevin J., Wilson, Katharine J., LaPrade, Robert F., Clanton, Thomas O.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Purpose The ankle rearfoot complex consists of the ankle and subtalar joints. This is an observational study on two test conditions of the rearfoot complex. Using high-speed biplane fluoroscopy, we present a method to measure rearfoot kinematics during normal gait and compare rearfoot kinematics between barefoot and shod gait. Methods Six male subjects completed a walking trial while biplane fluoroscopy images were acquired during stance phase. Bone models of the calcaneus and tibia were reconstructed from computed tomography images and aligned with the biplane fluoroscopy images. An optimization algorithm was used to determine the three-dimensional position of the bones and calculate rearfoot kinematics. Results Peak plantarflexion was higher (barefoot: 9.1°; 95 % CI 5.2:13.0; shod: 5.7°; 95 % CI 3.6:7.8; p  = 0.015) and neutral plantar/dorsiflexion occurred later in the stance phase (barefoot: 31.1 %; 95 % CI 23.6:38.6; shod: 17.7 %; 95 % CI 14.4:21.0; p  = 0.019) during barefoot walking compared to shod walking. An eversion peak of 8.7° (95 % CI 1.9:15.5) occurred at 27.8 % (95 % CI 18.4:37.2) of stance during barefoot walking, while during shod walking a brief inversion to 1.2° (95 % CI −2.1:4.5; p  = 0.021) occurred earlier (11.5 % of stance; 95 % CI 0.2:22.8; p  = 0.008) during stance phase. The tibia was internally rotated relative to the calcaneus throughout stance phase in both conditions (barefoot: 5.1° (95 % CI −1.4:11.6); shod: 3.6° (95 % CI −0.4:7.6); ns.). Conclusions Biplane fluoroscopy can allow for detailed quantification of dynamic in vivo ankle kinematics during barefoot and shod walking conditions. This methodology could be used in the future to study hindfoot pathology after trauma, for congenital disease and after sports injuries such as instability. Level of evidence II.
ISSN:0942-2056
1433-7347
DOI:10.1007/s00167-014-3084-4