Effect of Bacteriophages on the Growth of Flavobacterium psychrophilum and Development of Phage-Resistant Strains

The controlling effect of single and multiple phages on the density of Flavobacterium psychrophilum at different initial multiplicity of infection (MOI) was assessed in batch cultures to explore the potential for phage-based treatment of this important fish pathogen. A high initial phage concentrati...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Microbial ecology 2016-05, Vol.71 (4), p.845-859
Hauptverfasser: Christiansen, Rói Hammershaimb, Madsen, Lone, Dalsgaard, Inger, Castillo, Daniel, Kalatzis, Panos G, Middelboe, Mathias
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 859
container_issue 4
container_start_page 845
container_title Microbial ecology
container_volume 71
creator Christiansen, Rói Hammershaimb
Madsen, Lone
Dalsgaard, Inger
Castillo, Daniel
Kalatzis, Panos G
Middelboe, Mathias
description The controlling effect of single and multiple phages on the density of Flavobacterium psychrophilum at different initial multiplicity of infection (MOI) was assessed in batch cultures to explore the potential for phage-based treatment of this important fish pathogen. A high initial phage concentration (MOI = 0.3–4) was crucial for efficient viral lysis, resulting in a 10⁴–10⁵-fold reduction of phage-sensitive cells (both single phages and phage cocktails), which was maintained throughout the incubation (>10 days). Following cell lysis, regrowth of phage-resistant strains was examined and resistant strains were isolated for further characterization. The application of a mathematical model allowed simulation of phage-host interactions and resistance development, confirming indications from strain isolations that phage-sensitive strains dominated the regrowing population (>99.8 %) at low MOI and phage-resistant strains (>87.8 %) dominated at high MOI. A cross-infectivity test covering 68 isolated strains and 22 phages resulted in 23 different host susceptibility patterns, with 20 of the isolates being resistant to all the applied phages. Eleven isolated strains with different susceptibility patterns had lower growth rates (0.093 to 0.31 h⁻¹) than the host strain (0.33 h⁻¹), while 10 of 14 examined strains had lost the ability to take up specific substrates as shown by BIOLOG profiles. Despite increased selection for phage resistance at high MOI, the results emphasize that high initial MOI is essential for fast and effective control of F. psychrophilum infection and suggest that the small populations of resistant clones had reduced competitive abilities relative to the sensitive ancestral strain.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s00248-016-0737-5
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1785235723</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>48723551</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>48723551</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c451t-39badd64a55cf07404329de4bc0405e06b8090412394a63f3262e9abd618f2443</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNks1u1TAQhS0EopfCA7AAIrHpxjD-t5eltAWpEohSiZ3lJM69uUri1E6K-vY4TakQC8TKss83Z2Z0jNBLAu8IgHqfACjXGIjEoJjC4hHaEM4oJpr_eIw2AEZgJqk-QM9S2gMQJSl7ig6o1EZLIzbo-rRpfDUVoSk-uGrysQ3jzm19KsJQTDtfnMfwc9ot-lnnbkK5QnNfjOm22sVMt12-uaEuPvob34Wx98Od39fFB3_zqU2Ty0-XU3TtkJ6jJ43rkn9xfx6iq7PT7yef8MWX888nxxe44oJMmJnS1bXkToiqAcUh72Vqz8sKOAgPstRggBPKDHeSNYxK6o0ra0l0Qzlnh-ho9R1juJ59mmzfpsp3nRt8mJMlSgvKhKLsP1BltKFUmIy-_QvdhzkOeZGF0gryHEtvslJVDClF39gxtr2Lt5aAXaKza3Q2R2eX6KzINa_vneey9_VDxe-sMkBXIGVp2Pr4R-t_uL5ai_ZpCvHBlOu8txAk629WvXHBum1sk726pNkgfxbKGTD2C_7Gtdo</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1778703264</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Effect of Bacteriophages on the Growth of Flavobacterium psychrophilum and Development of Phage-Resistant Strains</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing</source><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Christiansen, Rói Hammershaimb ; Madsen, Lone ; Dalsgaard, Inger ; Castillo, Daniel ; Kalatzis, Panos G ; Middelboe, Mathias</creator><creatorcontrib>Christiansen, Rói Hammershaimb ; Madsen, Lone ; Dalsgaard, Inger ; Castillo, Daniel ; Kalatzis, Panos G ; Middelboe, Mathias</creatorcontrib><description>The controlling effect of single and multiple phages on the density of Flavobacterium psychrophilum at different initial multiplicity of infection (MOI) was assessed in batch cultures to explore the potential for phage-based treatment of this important fish pathogen. A high initial phage concentration (MOI = 0.3–4) was crucial for efficient viral lysis, resulting in a 10⁴–10⁵-fold reduction of phage-sensitive cells (both single phages and phage cocktails), which was maintained throughout the incubation (&gt;10 days). Following cell lysis, regrowth of phage-resistant strains was examined and resistant strains were isolated for further characterization. The application of a mathematical model allowed simulation of phage-host interactions and resistance development, confirming indications from strain isolations that phage-sensitive strains dominated the regrowing population (&gt;99.8 %) at low MOI and phage-resistant strains (&gt;87.8 %) dominated at high MOI. A cross-infectivity test covering 68 isolated strains and 22 phages resulted in 23 different host susceptibility patterns, with 20 of the isolates being resistant to all the applied phages. Eleven isolated strains with different susceptibility patterns had lower growth rates (0.093 to 0.31 h⁻¹) than the host strain (0.33 h⁻¹), while 10 of 14 examined strains had lost the ability to take up specific substrates as shown by BIOLOG profiles. Despite increased selection for phage resistance at high MOI, the results emphasize that high initial MOI is essential for fast and effective control of F. psychrophilum infection and suggest that the small populations of resistant clones had reduced competitive abilities relative to the sensitive ancestral strain.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0095-3628</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1432-184X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s00248-016-0737-5</identifier><identifier>PMID: 26898695</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Springer US</publisher><subject>Animals ; Bacteria ; bacteriophages ; Bacteriophages - physiology ; Biomedical and Life Sciences ; clones ; DNA, Bacterial - genetics ; Ecology ; fish ; Fish Diseases - microbiology ; Fish Diseases - prevention &amp; control ; Fishes - microbiology ; Flavobacteriaceae Infections - microbiology ; Flavobacteriaceae Infections - prevention &amp; control ; Flavobacteriaceae Infections - veterinary ; Flavobacteriaceae Infections - virology ; Flavobacterium - genetics ; Flavobacterium - growth &amp; development ; Flavobacterium - isolation &amp; purification ; Flavobacterium - virology ; Flavobacterium psychrophilum ; Genome, Bacterial ; Geoecology/Natural Processes ; Life Sciences ; mathematical models ; Microbial Ecology ; Microbiology ; MICROBIOLOGY OF AQUATIC SYSTEMS ; Mutation ; Nature Conservation ; pathogens ; Phage Therapy ; Regrowth ; Species Specificity ; Water Quality/Water Pollution</subject><ispartof>Microbial ecology, 2016-05, Vol.71 (4), p.845-859</ispartof><rights>Springer Science+Business Media New York 2016</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c451t-39badd64a55cf07404329de4bc0405e06b8090412394a63f3262e9abd618f2443</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c451t-39badd64a55cf07404329de4bc0405e06b8090412394a63f3262e9abd618f2443</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/48723551$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/48723551$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,803,27924,27925,41488,42557,51319,58017,58250</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26898695$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Christiansen, Rói Hammershaimb</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Madsen, Lone</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dalsgaard, Inger</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Castillo, Daniel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kalatzis, Panos G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Middelboe, Mathias</creatorcontrib><title>Effect of Bacteriophages on the Growth of Flavobacterium psychrophilum and Development of Phage-Resistant Strains</title><title>Microbial ecology</title><addtitle>Microb Ecol</addtitle><addtitle>Microb Ecol</addtitle><description>The controlling effect of single and multiple phages on the density of Flavobacterium psychrophilum at different initial multiplicity of infection (MOI) was assessed in batch cultures to explore the potential for phage-based treatment of this important fish pathogen. A high initial phage concentration (MOI = 0.3–4) was crucial for efficient viral lysis, resulting in a 10⁴–10⁵-fold reduction of phage-sensitive cells (both single phages and phage cocktails), which was maintained throughout the incubation (&gt;10 days). Following cell lysis, regrowth of phage-resistant strains was examined and resistant strains were isolated for further characterization. The application of a mathematical model allowed simulation of phage-host interactions and resistance development, confirming indications from strain isolations that phage-sensitive strains dominated the regrowing population (&gt;99.8 %) at low MOI and phage-resistant strains (&gt;87.8 %) dominated at high MOI. A cross-infectivity test covering 68 isolated strains and 22 phages resulted in 23 different host susceptibility patterns, with 20 of the isolates being resistant to all the applied phages. Eleven isolated strains with different susceptibility patterns had lower growth rates (0.093 to 0.31 h⁻¹) than the host strain (0.33 h⁻¹), while 10 of 14 examined strains had lost the ability to take up specific substrates as shown by BIOLOG profiles. Despite increased selection for phage resistance at high MOI, the results emphasize that high initial MOI is essential for fast and effective control of F. psychrophilum infection and suggest that the small populations of resistant clones had reduced competitive abilities relative to the sensitive ancestral strain.</description><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Bacteria</subject><subject>bacteriophages</subject><subject>Bacteriophages - physiology</subject><subject>Biomedical and Life Sciences</subject><subject>clones</subject><subject>DNA, Bacterial - genetics</subject><subject>Ecology</subject><subject>fish</subject><subject>Fish Diseases - microbiology</subject><subject>Fish Diseases - prevention &amp; control</subject><subject>Fishes - microbiology</subject><subject>Flavobacteriaceae Infections - microbiology</subject><subject>Flavobacteriaceae Infections - prevention &amp; control</subject><subject>Flavobacteriaceae Infections - veterinary</subject><subject>Flavobacteriaceae Infections - virology</subject><subject>Flavobacterium - genetics</subject><subject>Flavobacterium - growth &amp; development</subject><subject>Flavobacterium - isolation &amp; purification</subject><subject>Flavobacterium - virology</subject><subject>Flavobacterium psychrophilum</subject><subject>Genome, Bacterial</subject><subject>Geoecology/Natural Processes</subject><subject>Life Sciences</subject><subject>mathematical models</subject><subject>Microbial Ecology</subject><subject>Microbiology</subject><subject>MICROBIOLOGY OF AQUATIC SYSTEMS</subject><subject>Mutation</subject><subject>Nature Conservation</subject><subject>pathogens</subject><subject>Phage Therapy</subject><subject>Regrowth</subject><subject>Species Specificity</subject><subject>Water Quality/Water Pollution</subject><issn>0095-3628</issn><issn>1432-184X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNqNks1u1TAQhS0EopfCA7AAIrHpxjD-t5eltAWpEohSiZ3lJM69uUri1E6K-vY4TakQC8TKss83Z2Z0jNBLAu8IgHqfACjXGIjEoJjC4hHaEM4oJpr_eIw2AEZgJqk-QM9S2gMQJSl7ig6o1EZLIzbo-rRpfDUVoSk-uGrysQ3jzm19KsJQTDtfnMfwc9ot-lnnbkK5QnNfjOm22sVMt12-uaEuPvob34Wx98Od39fFB3_zqU2Ty0-XU3TtkJ6jJ43rkn9xfx6iq7PT7yef8MWX888nxxe44oJMmJnS1bXkToiqAcUh72Vqz8sKOAgPstRggBPKDHeSNYxK6o0ra0l0Qzlnh-ho9R1juJ59mmzfpsp3nRt8mJMlSgvKhKLsP1BltKFUmIy-_QvdhzkOeZGF0gryHEtvslJVDClF39gxtr2Lt5aAXaKza3Q2R2eX6KzINa_vneey9_VDxe-sMkBXIGVp2Pr4R-t_uL5ai_ZpCvHBlOu8txAk629WvXHBum1sk726pNkgfxbKGTD2C_7Gtdo</recordid><startdate>20160501</startdate><enddate>20160501</enddate><creator>Christiansen, Rói Hammershaimb</creator><creator>Madsen, Lone</creator><creator>Dalsgaard, Inger</creator><creator>Castillo, Daniel</creator><creator>Kalatzis, Panos G</creator><creator>Middelboe, Mathias</creator><general>Springer US</general><general>Springer Science + Business Media</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88A</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BKSAR</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>H95</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PCBAR</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20160501</creationdate><title>Effect of Bacteriophages on the Growth of Flavobacterium psychrophilum and Development of Phage-Resistant Strains</title><author>Christiansen, Rói Hammershaimb ; Madsen, Lone ; Dalsgaard, Inger ; Castillo, Daniel ; Kalatzis, Panos G ; Middelboe, Mathias</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c451t-39badd64a55cf07404329de4bc0405e06b8090412394a63f3262e9abd618f2443</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Bacteria</topic><topic>bacteriophages</topic><topic>Bacteriophages - physiology</topic><topic>Biomedical and Life Sciences</topic><topic>clones</topic><topic>DNA, Bacterial - genetics</topic><topic>Ecology</topic><topic>fish</topic><topic>Fish Diseases - microbiology</topic><topic>Fish Diseases - prevention &amp; control</topic><topic>Fishes - microbiology</topic><topic>Flavobacteriaceae Infections - microbiology</topic><topic>Flavobacteriaceae Infections - prevention &amp; control</topic><topic>Flavobacteriaceae Infections - veterinary</topic><topic>Flavobacteriaceae Infections - virology</topic><topic>Flavobacterium - genetics</topic><topic>Flavobacterium - growth &amp; development</topic><topic>Flavobacterium - isolation &amp; purification</topic><topic>Flavobacterium - virology</topic><topic>Flavobacterium psychrophilum</topic><topic>Genome, Bacterial</topic><topic>Geoecology/Natural Processes</topic><topic>Life Sciences</topic><topic>mathematical models</topic><topic>Microbial Ecology</topic><topic>Microbiology</topic><topic>MICROBIOLOGY OF AQUATIC SYSTEMS</topic><topic>Mutation</topic><topic>Nature Conservation</topic><topic>pathogens</topic><topic>Phage Therapy</topic><topic>Regrowth</topic><topic>Species Specificity</topic><topic>Water Quality/Water Pollution</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Christiansen, Rói Hammershaimb</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Madsen, Lone</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dalsgaard, Inger</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Castillo, Daniel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kalatzis, Panos G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Middelboe, Mathias</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Biology Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric &amp; Aquatic Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 1: Biological Sciences &amp; Living Resources</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric &amp; Aquatic Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Microbial ecology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Christiansen, Rói Hammershaimb</au><au>Madsen, Lone</au><au>Dalsgaard, Inger</au><au>Castillo, Daniel</au><au>Kalatzis, Panos G</au><au>Middelboe, Mathias</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Effect of Bacteriophages on the Growth of Flavobacterium psychrophilum and Development of Phage-Resistant Strains</atitle><jtitle>Microbial ecology</jtitle><stitle>Microb Ecol</stitle><addtitle>Microb Ecol</addtitle><date>2016-05-01</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>71</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>845</spage><epage>859</epage><pages>845-859</pages><issn>0095-3628</issn><eissn>1432-184X</eissn><abstract>The controlling effect of single and multiple phages on the density of Flavobacterium psychrophilum at different initial multiplicity of infection (MOI) was assessed in batch cultures to explore the potential for phage-based treatment of this important fish pathogen. A high initial phage concentration (MOI = 0.3–4) was crucial for efficient viral lysis, resulting in a 10⁴–10⁵-fold reduction of phage-sensitive cells (both single phages and phage cocktails), which was maintained throughout the incubation (&gt;10 days). Following cell lysis, regrowth of phage-resistant strains was examined and resistant strains were isolated for further characterization. The application of a mathematical model allowed simulation of phage-host interactions and resistance development, confirming indications from strain isolations that phage-sensitive strains dominated the regrowing population (&gt;99.8 %) at low MOI and phage-resistant strains (&gt;87.8 %) dominated at high MOI. A cross-infectivity test covering 68 isolated strains and 22 phages resulted in 23 different host susceptibility patterns, with 20 of the isolates being resistant to all the applied phages. Eleven isolated strains with different susceptibility patterns had lower growth rates (0.093 to 0.31 h⁻¹) than the host strain (0.33 h⁻¹), while 10 of 14 examined strains had lost the ability to take up specific substrates as shown by BIOLOG profiles. Despite increased selection for phage resistance at high MOI, the results emphasize that high initial MOI is essential for fast and effective control of F. psychrophilum infection and suggest that the small populations of resistant clones had reduced competitive abilities relative to the sensitive ancestral strain.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Springer US</pub><pmid>26898695</pmid><doi>10.1007/s00248-016-0737-5</doi><tpages>15</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0095-3628
ispartof Microbial ecology, 2016-05, Vol.71 (4), p.845-859
issn 0095-3628
1432-184X
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1785235723
source MEDLINE; JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing; SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings
subjects Animals
Bacteria
bacteriophages
Bacteriophages - physiology
Biomedical and Life Sciences
clones
DNA, Bacterial - genetics
Ecology
fish
Fish Diseases - microbiology
Fish Diseases - prevention & control
Fishes - microbiology
Flavobacteriaceae Infections - microbiology
Flavobacteriaceae Infections - prevention & control
Flavobacteriaceae Infections - veterinary
Flavobacteriaceae Infections - virology
Flavobacterium - genetics
Flavobacterium - growth & development
Flavobacterium - isolation & purification
Flavobacterium - virology
Flavobacterium psychrophilum
Genome, Bacterial
Geoecology/Natural Processes
Life Sciences
mathematical models
Microbial Ecology
Microbiology
MICROBIOLOGY OF AQUATIC SYSTEMS
Mutation
Nature Conservation
pathogens
Phage Therapy
Regrowth
Species Specificity
Water Quality/Water Pollution
title Effect of Bacteriophages on the Growth of Flavobacterium psychrophilum and Development of Phage-Resistant Strains
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T22%3A56%3A23IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Effect%20of%20Bacteriophages%20on%20the%20Growth%20of%20Flavobacterium%20psychrophilum%20and%20Development%20of%20Phage-Resistant%20Strains&rft.jtitle=Microbial%20ecology&rft.au=Christiansen,%20R%C3%B3i%20Hammershaimb&rft.date=2016-05-01&rft.volume=71&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=845&rft.epage=859&rft.pages=845-859&rft.issn=0095-3628&rft.eissn=1432-184X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s00248-016-0737-5&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E48723551%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1778703264&rft_id=info:pmid/26898695&rft_jstor_id=48723551&rfr_iscdi=true