Comparing the short-term outcomes of laparoscopic distal gastrectomy with D1+ and D2 lymph node dissection for gastric cancer

Introduction Laparoscopic distal gastrectomy (LDG) with D1+ lymph node dissection (LND) for early gastric cancer has been widely accepted. However, LDG with D2 LND for advanced gastric cancer remains in limited use. The aim of this retrospective study was to clarify the safety of LDG with D2 LND for...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Asian journal of endoscopic surgery 2016-05, Vol.9 (2), p.116-121
Hauptverfasser: Goto, Hironobu, Yasuda, Takashi, Oshikiri, Taro, Kanaji, Shingo, Kawasaki, Kentaro, Imanishi, Tatsuya, Oyama, Masato, Kakinoki, Keitaro, Ohara, Tadayuki, Sendo, Hiroyoshi, Fujino, Yasuhiro, Tominaga, Masahiro, Kakeji, Yoshihiro
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 121
container_issue 2
container_start_page 116
container_title Asian journal of endoscopic surgery
container_volume 9
creator Goto, Hironobu
Yasuda, Takashi
Oshikiri, Taro
Kanaji, Shingo
Kawasaki, Kentaro
Imanishi, Tatsuya
Oyama, Masato
Kakinoki, Keitaro
Ohara, Tadayuki
Sendo, Hiroyoshi
Fujino, Yasuhiro
Tominaga, Masahiro
Kakeji, Yoshihiro
description Introduction Laparoscopic distal gastrectomy (LDG) with D1+ lymph node dissection (LND) for early gastric cancer has been widely accepted. However, LDG with D2 LND for advanced gastric cancer remains in limited use. The aim of this retrospective study was to clarify the safety of LDG with D2 LND for gastric cancer. Methods From January 2010 to September 2014, 296 patients underwent LDG; those who received D1+ LND (n = 230) or D2 LND (n = 66) were included in this study. The clinicopathological characteristics and short‐term outcomes of both groups were investigated and compared. Results There were no significant differences in the incidence of postoperative complications between the two groups. However, the frequency of infectious intra‐abdominal complications was higher in the D2 LND group than in the D1+ LND group. Additionally, a lower risk of infectious intra‐abdominal complications was seen with certified than with uncertified operators. Conclusion The evaluation of short‐term outcomes demonstrated that LDG with D2 LND is generally feasible. However, the risk of infectious intra‐abdominal complications is higher with D2 LND than with D1+ LND. Also, D2 LND should be performed by trained operators.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/ases.12269
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1785213179</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1785213179</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-i3439-7601f29b2845c60d8cc620765193096f672234f8b4923061f8818b59c677e3403</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkU1v1DAQhi0EoqVw4QcgS1yQqrQeO_HHsdp2C1LVHgqqxMXyOk7XJYmD7ajdA_8db7fsgbnMSPO8o5l5EfoI5ARKnJrk0glQytUrdAiikVWjgLze14QeoHcpPRDCBdTsLTqgXJKa1eQQ_VmEYTLRj_c4rx1O6xBzlV0ccJizDYNLOHS4N4UJyYbJW9z6lE2P703K0dkchg1-9HmNz-EYm7HF5xT3m2Fa4zG0bkunQvkw4i7EnaoMsWa0Lr5HbzrTJ_fhJR-hH8uL74uv1dXN5bfF2VXlWc1UJTiBjqoVlXVjOWmltZwSwRtQjCjecUEpqzu5qhVlhEMnJchVoywXwpUz2RH6sps7xfB7dinrwSfr-t6MLsxJg5ANBQZCFfTzf-hDmONYtttSNaPAeVOoTy_UvBpcq6foBxM3-t9jCwA74NH3brPvA9Fby_TWMv1smT67vbh9roqm2mnKg93TXmPiL80FE42-u77UP9lS3S2viV6wv_Lmlps</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1784321665</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparing the short-term outcomes of laparoscopic distal gastrectomy with D1+ and D2 lymph node dissection for gastric cancer</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Goto, Hironobu ; Yasuda, Takashi ; Oshikiri, Taro ; Kanaji, Shingo ; Kawasaki, Kentaro ; Imanishi, Tatsuya ; Oyama, Masato ; Kakinoki, Keitaro ; Ohara, Tadayuki ; Sendo, Hiroyoshi ; Fujino, Yasuhiro ; Tominaga, Masahiro ; Kakeji, Yoshihiro</creator><creatorcontrib>Goto, Hironobu ; Yasuda, Takashi ; Oshikiri, Taro ; Kanaji, Shingo ; Kawasaki, Kentaro ; Imanishi, Tatsuya ; Oyama, Masato ; Kakinoki, Keitaro ; Ohara, Tadayuki ; Sendo, Hiroyoshi ; Fujino, Yasuhiro ; Tominaga, Masahiro ; Kakeji, Yoshihiro</creatorcontrib><description>Introduction Laparoscopic distal gastrectomy (LDG) with D1+ lymph node dissection (LND) for early gastric cancer has been widely accepted. However, LDG with D2 LND for advanced gastric cancer remains in limited use. The aim of this retrospective study was to clarify the safety of LDG with D2 LND for gastric cancer. Methods From January 2010 to September 2014, 296 patients underwent LDG; those who received D1+ LND (n = 230) or D2 LND (n = 66) were included in this study. The clinicopathological characteristics and short‐term outcomes of both groups were investigated and compared. Results There were no significant differences in the incidence of postoperative complications between the two groups. However, the frequency of infectious intra‐abdominal complications was higher in the D2 LND group than in the D1+ LND group. Additionally, a lower risk of infectious intra‐abdominal complications was seen with certified than with uncertified operators. Conclusion The evaluation of short‐term outcomes demonstrated that LDG with D2 LND is generally feasible. However, the risk of infectious intra‐abdominal complications is higher with D2 LND than with D1+ LND. Also, D2 LND should be performed by trained operators.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1758-5902</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1758-5910</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/ases.12269</identifier><identifier>PMID: 26804340</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Japan: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Abdomen ; Adult ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Biopsy ; D1+ lymph node dissection ; D2 lymph node dissection ; Female ; Gastrectomy ; Gastric cancer ; Humans ; laparoscopic distal gastrectomy ; Laparoscopy ; Lymph Node Excision ; Lymphatic system ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Retrospective Studies ; Short term ; Stomach Neoplasms - pathology ; Stomach Neoplasms - surgery ; Time Factors ; Treatment Outcome</subject><ispartof>Asian journal of endoscopic surgery, 2016-05, Vol.9 (2), p.116-121</ispartof><rights>2016 Japan Society for Endoscopic Surgery, Asia Endosurgery Task Force and John Wiley &amp; Sons Australia, Ltd</rights><rights>2016 Japan Society for Endoscopic Surgery, Asia Endosurgery Task Force and John Wiley &amp; Sons Australia, Ltd.</rights><rights>2016 Japan Society for Endoscopic Surgery, Asia Endosurgery Task Force and John Wiley Sons Australia, Ltd</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fases.12269$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fases.12269$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27901,27902,45550,45551</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26804340$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Goto, Hironobu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yasuda, Takashi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Oshikiri, Taro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kanaji, Shingo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kawasaki, Kentaro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Imanishi, Tatsuya</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Oyama, Masato</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kakinoki, Keitaro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ohara, Tadayuki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sendo, Hiroyoshi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fujino, Yasuhiro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tominaga, Masahiro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kakeji, Yoshihiro</creatorcontrib><title>Comparing the short-term outcomes of laparoscopic distal gastrectomy with D1+ and D2 lymph node dissection for gastric cancer</title><title>Asian journal of endoscopic surgery</title><addtitle>Asian J Endosc Surg</addtitle><description>Introduction Laparoscopic distal gastrectomy (LDG) with D1+ lymph node dissection (LND) for early gastric cancer has been widely accepted. However, LDG with D2 LND for advanced gastric cancer remains in limited use. The aim of this retrospective study was to clarify the safety of LDG with D2 LND for gastric cancer. Methods From January 2010 to September 2014, 296 patients underwent LDG; those who received D1+ LND (n = 230) or D2 LND (n = 66) were included in this study. The clinicopathological characteristics and short‐term outcomes of both groups were investigated and compared. Results There were no significant differences in the incidence of postoperative complications between the two groups. However, the frequency of infectious intra‐abdominal complications was higher in the D2 LND group than in the D1+ LND group. Additionally, a lower risk of infectious intra‐abdominal complications was seen with certified than with uncertified operators. Conclusion The evaluation of short‐term outcomes demonstrated that LDG with D2 LND is generally feasible. However, the risk of infectious intra‐abdominal complications is higher with D2 LND than with D1+ LND. Also, D2 LND should be performed by trained operators.</description><subject>Abdomen</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Biopsy</subject><subject>D1+ lymph node dissection</subject><subject>D2 lymph node dissection</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Gastrectomy</subject><subject>Gastric cancer</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>laparoscopic distal gastrectomy</subject><subject>Laparoscopy</subject><subject>Lymph Node Excision</subject><subject>Lymphatic system</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Short term</subject><subject>Stomach Neoplasms - pathology</subject><subject>Stomach Neoplasms - surgery</subject><subject>Time Factors</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><issn>1758-5902</issn><issn>1758-5910</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpdkU1v1DAQhi0EoqVw4QcgS1yQqrQeO_HHsdp2C1LVHgqqxMXyOk7XJYmD7ajdA_8db7fsgbnMSPO8o5l5EfoI5ARKnJrk0glQytUrdAiikVWjgLze14QeoHcpPRDCBdTsLTqgXJKa1eQQ_VmEYTLRj_c4rx1O6xBzlV0ccJizDYNLOHS4N4UJyYbJW9z6lE2P703K0dkchg1-9HmNz-EYm7HF5xT3m2Fa4zG0bkunQvkw4i7EnaoMsWa0Lr5HbzrTJ_fhJR-hH8uL74uv1dXN5bfF2VXlWc1UJTiBjqoVlXVjOWmltZwSwRtQjCjecUEpqzu5qhVlhEMnJchVoywXwpUz2RH6sps7xfB7dinrwSfr-t6MLsxJg5ANBQZCFfTzf-hDmONYtttSNaPAeVOoTy_UvBpcq6foBxM3-t9jCwA74NH3brPvA9Fby_TWMv1smT67vbh9roqm2mnKg93TXmPiL80FE42-u77UP9lS3S2viV6wv_Lmlps</recordid><startdate>201605</startdate><enddate>201605</enddate><creator>Goto, Hironobu</creator><creator>Yasuda, Takashi</creator><creator>Oshikiri, Taro</creator><creator>Kanaji, Shingo</creator><creator>Kawasaki, Kentaro</creator><creator>Imanishi, Tatsuya</creator><creator>Oyama, Masato</creator><creator>Kakinoki, Keitaro</creator><creator>Ohara, Tadayuki</creator><creator>Sendo, Hiroyoshi</creator><creator>Fujino, Yasuhiro</creator><creator>Tominaga, Masahiro</creator><creator>Kakeji, Yoshihiro</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201605</creationdate><title>Comparing the short-term outcomes of laparoscopic distal gastrectomy with D1+ and D2 lymph node dissection for gastric cancer</title><author>Goto, Hironobu ; Yasuda, Takashi ; Oshikiri, Taro ; Kanaji, Shingo ; Kawasaki, Kentaro ; Imanishi, Tatsuya ; Oyama, Masato ; Kakinoki, Keitaro ; Ohara, Tadayuki ; Sendo, Hiroyoshi ; Fujino, Yasuhiro ; Tominaga, Masahiro ; Kakeji, Yoshihiro</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-i3439-7601f29b2845c60d8cc620765193096f672234f8b4923061f8818b59c677e3403</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Abdomen</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Biopsy</topic><topic>D1+ lymph node dissection</topic><topic>D2 lymph node dissection</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Gastrectomy</topic><topic>Gastric cancer</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>laparoscopic distal gastrectomy</topic><topic>Laparoscopy</topic><topic>Lymph Node Excision</topic><topic>Lymphatic system</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Short term</topic><topic>Stomach Neoplasms - pathology</topic><topic>Stomach Neoplasms - surgery</topic><topic>Time Factors</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Goto, Hironobu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yasuda, Takashi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Oshikiri, Taro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kanaji, Shingo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kawasaki, Kentaro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Imanishi, Tatsuya</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Oyama, Masato</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kakinoki, Keitaro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ohara, Tadayuki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sendo, Hiroyoshi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fujino, Yasuhiro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tominaga, Masahiro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kakeji, Yoshihiro</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Asian journal of endoscopic surgery</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Goto, Hironobu</au><au>Yasuda, Takashi</au><au>Oshikiri, Taro</au><au>Kanaji, Shingo</au><au>Kawasaki, Kentaro</au><au>Imanishi, Tatsuya</au><au>Oyama, Masato</au><au>Kakinoki, Keitaro</au><au>Ohara, Tadayuki</au><au>Sendo, Hiroyoshi</au><au>Fujino, Yasuhiro</au><au>Tominaga, Masahiro</au><au>Kakeji, Yoshihiro</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparing the short-term outcomes of laparoscopic distal gastrectomy with D1+ and D2 lymph node dissection for gastric cancer</atitle><jtitle>Asian journal of endoscopic surgery</jtitle><addtitle>Asian J Endosc Surg</addtitle><date>2016-05</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>9</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>116</spage><epage>121</epage><pages>116-121</pages><issn>1758-5902</issn><eissn>1758-5910</eissn><abstract>Introduction Laparoscopic distal gastrectomy (LDG) with D1+ lymph node dissection (LND) for early gastric cancer has been widely accepted. However, LDG with D2 LND for advanced gastric cancer remains in limited use. The aim of this retrospective study was to clarify the safety of LDG with D2 LND for gastric cancer. Methods From January 2010 to September 2014, 296 patients underwent LDG; those who received D1+ LND (n = 230) or D2 LND (n = 66) were included in this study. The clinicopathological characteristics and short‐term outcomes of both groups were investigated and compared. Results There were no significant differences in the incidence of postoperative complications between the two groups. However, the frequency of infectious intra‐abdominal complications was higher in the D2 LND group than in the D1+ LND group. Additionally, a lower risk of infectious intra‐abdominal complications was seen with certified than with uncertified operators. Conclusion The evaluation of short‐term outcomes demonstrated that LDG with D2 LND is generally feasible. However, the risk of infectious intra‐abdominal complications is higher with D2 LND than with D1+ LND. Also, D2 LND should be performed by trained operators.</abstract><cop>Japan</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><pmid>26804340</pmid><doi>10.1111/ases.12269</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1758-5902
ispartof Asian journal of endoscopic surgery, 2016-05, Vol.9 (2), p.116-121
issn 1758-5902
1758-5910
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1785213179
source MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete
subjects Abdomen
Adult
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Biopsy
D1+ lymph node dissection
D2 lymph node dissection
Female
Gastrectomy
Gastric cancer
Humans
laparoscopic distal gastrectomy
Laparoscopy
Lymph Node Excision
Lymphatic system
Male
Middle Aged
Retrospective Studies
Short term
Stomach Neoplasms - pathology
Stomach Neoplasms - surgery
Time Factors
Treatment Outcome
title Comparing the short-term outcomes of laparoscopic distal gastrectomy with D1+ and D2 lymph node dissection for gastric cancer
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-21T18%3A06%3A28IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparing%20the%20short-term%20outcomes%20of%20laparoscopic%20distal%20gastrectomy%20with%20D1+%20and%20D2%20lymph%20node%20dissection%20for%20gastric%20cancer&rft.jtitle=Asian%20journal%20of%20endoscopic%20surgery&rft.au=Goto,%20Hironobu&rft.date=2016-05&rft.volume=9&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=116&rft.epage=121&rft.pages=116-121&rft.issn=1758-5902&rft.eissn=1758-5910&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/ases.12269&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E1785213179%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1784321665&rft_id=info:pmid/26804340&rfr_iscdi=true