Acute Antibody-Mediated Rejection in Kidney Transplant Based on the 2013 Banff Criteria: Single-Center Experience in Uruguay

Abstract Background Acute antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) diagnosis criteria have changed in recent consensus of Banff, with current evidence of C4d-negative AMR. Our objective was to evaluate incidence of AMR in renal transplantation according to Banff 2013 criteria and to examine the histologica...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Transplantation proceedings 2016-03, Vol.48 (2), p.612-615
Hauptverfasser: Nin, M, Coitiño, R, Kurdian, M, Orihuela, L, Astesiano, R, Garau, M, López, D, Rievas, G, Rodriguez, I, González-Martínez, F, Noboa, O
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 615
container_issue 2
container_start_page 612
container_title Transplantation proceedings
container_volume 48
creator Nin, M
Coitiño, R
Kurdian, M
Orihuela, L
Astesiano, R
Garau, M
López, D
Rievas, G
Rodriguez, I
González-Martínez, F
Noboa, O
description Abstract Background Acute antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) diagnosis criteria have changed in recent consensus of Banff, with current evidence of C4d-negative AMR. Our objective was to evaluate incidence of AMR in renal transplantation according to Banff 2013 criteria and to examine the histological features and outcome. Methods This retrospective study involved all kidney transplants with histological diagnosis of acute rejection (AR) at our center between 2000 and 2014. All the biopsies with AR were re-assessed by a nephro-pathologist and classified by use of the Banff 2013 criteria. Results Of 205 kidney transplants, biopsy-proven AR was diagnosed in 25 cases (12%). Re-assessing them according to Banff 2013 criteria, AMR was diagnosed in 17 (8.3%) and represented 68% of the confirmed rejections. AMR diagnosis was performed on day 23 ± 26, with median of 11 days. From the 17 cases, 7 had concomitant T-cell–mediated rejection. All cases presented endothelial edema and acute tubular necrosis. Glomerulitis was found in 12 cases and capillaritis in 14. In 3, associated thrombotic micro-angiopathy (TMA) was found. Intimal and transmural arteritis was evidenced in 5 and 1 patient. In 2, transplant glomerulopathy was present. Seven of the 10 biopsies with C4d staining in the peri-tubular capillaries were positive. Twelve cases received plasmapheresis, 6 received gamma-globulin, and 6 received rituximab. After administration of anti-AMR therapy, 16 cases recovered renal function, reaching a serum creatinine level of 1.5 ± 0.6 mg %. Graft survival at 1 year was lower in the AMR group versus patients without AMR (81.9% vs 98.9%, log-rank test, P  < .001). Risk factors for AMR were re-transplant (30% vs 7%, P  = .02), HLA-DR mismatch (1.06 ± 0.65 vs 0.7 ± 0.6, P  = .03), panel-reactive antibody (28% ± 33 vs 6.2 ± 13, P  = .00), and delayed graft function (82% vs 30%, P  = .00). Conclusions Adapting the new Banff 2013 criteria increased the sensitivity of the diagnosis of ARM. Regarding our data, despite an adequate response to the therapy, it resulted in a worse graft survival by the first year of renal transplant.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.transproceed.2016.03.019
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1784461923</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>1_s2_0_S0041134516003985</els_id><sourcerecordid>1784461923</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c435t-33c1bed28a33dabe124c0bed88fd7c92655a51081b70f69c732e6df5051e59ab3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkstu1DAUhi0EokPhFZDFik2Cj51rF0jDUC6iCIm2a8uxT4pDxhlsBxGJh8fptBJixcryf_5z-3QIeQEsBwbVqyGPXrlw8JNGNDlPWs5EzqB9QDbQ1CLjFRcPyYaxAjIQRXlCnoQwsPTnhXhMTngNwBgUG_J7q-eIdOui7SazZJ_RWBXR0K84oI52ctQ6-skahwu9um07KhfpGxWSKUXjN6RpApEU1_d0521Eb9UZvbTuZsRshy4J9PzXIcnoNK71rv18M6vlKXnUqzHgs7v3lFy_O7_afcguvrz_uNteZLoQZcyE0NCh4Y0SwqgOgReaJaFpelPrlldlqUpgDXQ166tW14JjZfqSlYBlqzpxSl4e6yZkP2YMUe5t0DimTXCag4S6KYoKWi6S9exo1X4KwWMvD97ulV8kMLnSl4P8m75c6UsmZKKfkp_f9Zm7fYrdp97jToa3RwOmbX9a9DLoWyjG-kRbmsn-X5_X_5TRo3VWq_E7LhiGafYu8ZQgA5dMXq53sJ4BVIyJtinFH3IVsg4</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1784461923</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Acute Antibody-Mediated Rejection in Kidney Transplant Based on the 2013 Banff Criteria: Single-Center Experience in Uruguay</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)</source><creator>Nin, M ; Coitiño, R ; Kurdian, M ; Orihuela, L ; Astesiano, R ; Garau, M ; López, D ; Rievas, G ; Rodriguez, I ; González-Martínez, F ; Noboa, O</creator><creatorcontrib>Nin, M ; Coitiño, R ; Kurdian, M ; Orihuela, L ; Astesiano, R ; Garau, M ; López, D ; Rievas, G ; Rodriguez, I ; González-Martínez, F ; Noboa, O</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract Background Acute antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) diagnosis criteria have changed in recent consensus of Banff, with current evidence of C4d-negative AMR. Our objective was to evaluate incidence of AMR in renal transplantation according to Banff 2013 criteria and to examine the histological features and outcome. Methods This retrospective study involved all kidney transplants with histological diagnosis of acute rejection (AR) at our center between 2000 and 2014. All the biopsies with AR were re-assessed by a nephro-pathologist and classified by use of the Banff 2013 criteria. Results Of 205 kidney transplants, biopsy-proven AR was diagnosed in 25 cases (12%). Re-assessing them according to Banff 2013 criteria, AMR was diagnosed in 17 (8.3%) and represented 68% of the confirmed rejections. AMR diagnosis was performed on day 23 ± 26, with median of 11 days. From the 17 cases, 7 had concomitant T-cell–mediated rejection. All cases presented endothelial edema and acute tubular necrosis. Glomerulitis was found in 12 cases and capillaritis in 14. In 3, associated thrombotic micro-angiopathy (TMA) was found. Intimal and transmural arteritis was evidenced in 5 and 1 patient. In 2, transplant glomerulopathy was present. Seven of the 10 biopsies with C4d staining in the peri-tubular capillaries were positive. Twelve cases received plasmapheresis, 6 received gamma-globulin, and 6 received rituximab. After administration of anti-AMR therapy, 16 cases recovered renal function, reaching a serum creatinine level of 1.5 ± 0.6 mg %. Graft survival at 1 year was lower in the AMR group versus patients without AMR (81.9% vs 98.9%, log-rank test, P  &lt; .001). Risk factors for AMR were re-transplant (30% vs 7%, P  = .02), HLA-DR mismatch (1.06 ± 0.65 vs 0.7 ± 0.6, P  = .03), panel-reactive antibody (28% ± 33 vs 6.2 ± 13, P  = .00), and delayed graft function (82% vs 30%, P  = .00). Conclusions Adapting the new Banff 2013 criteria increased the sensitivity of the diagnosis of ARM. Regarding our data, despite an adequate response to the therapy, it resulted in a worse graft survival by the first year of renal transplant.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0041-1345</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-2623</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2016.03.019</identifier><identifier>PMID: 27110014</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Adolescent ; Adult ; Antibody Formation - immunology ; Biopsy ; Delayed Graft Function - immunology ; Delayed Graft Function - pathology ; Delayed Graft Function - therapy ; Female ; gamma-Globulins - therapeutic use ; Glomerulonephritis - immunology ; Graft Rejection - immunology ; Graft Rejection - therapy ; Graft Survival - immunology ; Humans ; Immunoglobulins, Intravenous - therapeutic use ; Immunosuppression - methods ; Kidney - immunology ; Kidney - pathology ; Kidney Transplantation - adverse effects ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Plasmapheresis - methods ; Retrospective Studies ; Risk Factors ; Surgery ; Transplantation Immunology - immunology ; Uruguay ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>Transplantation proceedings, 2016-03, Vol.48 (2), p.612-615</ispartof><rights>Elsevier Inc.</rights><rights>2016 Elsevier Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c435t-33c1bed28a33dabe124c0bed88fd7c92655a51081b70f69c732e6df5051e59ab3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c435t-33c1bed28a33dabe124c0bed88fd7c92655a51081b70f69c732e6df5051e59ab3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.transproceed.2016.03.019$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27110014$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Nin, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Coitiño, R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kurdian, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Orihuela, L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Astesiano, R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Garau, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>López, D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rievas, G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rodriguez, I</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>González-Martínez, F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Noboa, O</creatorcontrib><title>Acute Antibody-Mediated Rejection in Kidney Transplant Based on the 2013 Banff Criteria: Single-Center Experience in Uruguay</title><title>Transplantation proceedings</title><addtitle>Transplant Proc</addtitle><description>Abstract Background Acute antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) diagnosis criteria have changed in recent consensus of Banff, with current evidence of C4d-negative AMR. Our objective was to evaluate incidence of AMR in renal transplantation according to Banff 2013 criteria and to examine the histological features and outcome. Methods This retrospective study involved all kidney transplants with histological diagnosis of acute rejection (AR) at our center between 2000 and 2014. All the biopsies with AR were re-assessed by a nephro-pathologist and classified by use of the Banff 2013 criteria. Results Of 205 kidney transplants, biopsy-proven AR was diagnosed in 25 cases (12%). Re-assessing them according to Banff 2013 criteria, AMR was diagnosed in 17 (8.3%) and represented 68% of the confirmed rejections. AMR diagnosis was performed on day 23 ± 26, with median of 11 days. From the 17 cases, 7 had concomitant T-cell–mediated rejection. All cases presented endothelial edema and acute tubular necrosis. Glomerulitis was found in 12 cases and capillaritis in 14. In 3, associated thrombotic micro-angiopathy (TMA) was found. Intimal and transmural arteritis was evidenced in 5 and 1 patient. In 2, transplant glomerulopathy was present. Seven of the 10 biopsies with C4d staining in the peri-tubular capillaries were positive. Twelve cases received plasmapheresis, 6 received gamma-globulin, and 6 received rituximab. After administration of anti-AMR therapy, 16 cases recovered renal function, reaching a serum creatinine level of 1.5 ± 0.6 mg %. Graft survival at 1 year was lower in the AMR group versus patients without AMR (81.9% vs 98.9%, log-rank test, P  &lt; .001). Risk factors for AMR were re-transplant (30% vs 7%, P  = .02), HLA-DR mismatch (1.06 ± 0.65 vs 0.7 ± 0.6, P  = .03), panel-reactive antibody (28% ± 33 vs 6.2 ± 13, P  = .00), and delayed graft function (82% vs 30%, P  = .00). Conclusions Adapting the new Banff 2013 criteria increased the sensitivity of the diagnosis of ARM. Regarding our data, despite an adequate response to the therapy, it resulted in a worse graft survival by the first year of renal transplant.</description><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Antibody Formation - immunology</subject><subject>Biopsy</subject><subject>Delayed Graft Function - immunology</subject><subject>Delayed Graft Function - pathology</subject><subject>Delayed Graft Function - therapy</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>gamma-Globulins - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Glomerulonephritis - immunology</subject><subject>Graft Rejection - immunology</subject><subject>Graft Rejection - therapy</subject><subject>Graft Survival - immunology</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Immunoglobulins, Intravenous - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Immunosuppression - methods</subject><subject>Kidney - immunology</subject><subject>Kidney - pathology</subject><subject>Kidney Transplantation - adverse effects</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Plasmapheresis - methods</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Risk Factors</subject><subject>Surgery</subject><subject>Transplantation Immunology - immunology</subject><subject>Uruguay</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>0041-1345</issn><issn>1873-2623</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkstu1DAUhi0EokPhFZDFik2Cj51rF0jDUC6iCIm2a8uxT4pDxhlsBxGJh8fptBJixcryf_5z-3QIeQEsBwbVqyGPXrlw8JNGNDlPWs5EzqB9QDbQ1CLjFRcPyYaxAjIQRXlCnoQwsPTnhXhMTngNwBgUG_J7q-eIdOui7SazZJ_RWBXR0K84oI52ctQ6-skahwu9um07KhfpGxWSKUXjN6RpApEU1_d0521Eb9UZvbTuZsRshy4J9PzXIcnoNK71rv18M6vlKXnUqzHgs7v3lFy_O7_afcguvrz_uNteZLoQZcyE0NCh4Y0SwqgOgReaJaFpelPrlldlqUpgDXQ166tW14JjZfqSlYBlqzpxSl4e6yZkP2YMUe5t0DimTXCag4S6KYoKWi6S9exo1X4KwWMvD97ulV8kMLnSl4P8m75c6UsmZKKfkp_f9Zm7fYrdp97jToa3RwOmbX9a9DLoWyjG-kRbmsn-X5_X_5TRo3VWq_E7LhiGafYu8ZQgA5dMXq53sJ4BVIyJtinFH3IVsg4</recordid><startdate>20160301</startdate><enddate>20160301</enddate><creator>Nin, M</creator><creator>Coitiño, R</creator><creator>Kurdian, M</creator><creator>Orihuela, L</creator><creator>Astesiano, R</creator><creator>Garau, M</creator><creator>López, D</creator><creator>Rievas, G</creator><creator>Rodriguez, I</creator><creator>González-Martínez, F</creator><creator>Noboa, O</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20160301</creationdate><title>Acute Antibody-Mediated Rejection in Kidney Transplant Based on the 2013 Banff Criteria: Single-Center Experience in Uruguay</title><author>Nin, M ; Coitiño, R ; Kurdian, M ; Orihuela, L ; Astesiano, R ; Garau, M ; López, D ; Rievas, G ; Rodriguez, I ; González-Martínez, F ; Noboa, O</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c435t-33c1bed28a33dabe124c0bed88fd7c92655a51081b70f69c732e6df5051e59ab3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Antibody Formation - immunology</topic><topic>Biopsy</topic><topic>Delayed Graft Function - immunology</topic><topic>Delayed Graft Function - pathology</topic><topic>Delayed Graft Function - therapy</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>gamma-Globulins - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Glomerulonephritis - immunology</topic><topic>Graft Rejection - immunology</topic><topic>Graft Rejection - therapy</topic><topic>Graft Survival - immunology</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Immunoglobulins, Intravenous - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Immunosuppression - methods</topic><topic>Kidney - immunology</topic><topic>Kidney - pathology</topic><topic>Kidney Transplantation - adverse effects</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Plasmapheresis - methods</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Risk Factors</topic><topic>Surgery</topic><topic>Transplantation Immunology - immunology</topic><topic>Uruguay</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Nin, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Coitiño, R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kurdian, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Orihuela, L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Astesiano, R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Garau, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>López, D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rievas, G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rodriguez, I</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>González-Martínez, F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Noboa, O</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Transplantation proceedings</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Nin, M</au><au>Coitiño, R</au><au>Kurdian, M</au><au>Orihuela, L</au><au>Astesiano, R</au><au>Garau, M</au><au>López, D</au><au>Rievas, G</au><au>Rodriguez, I</au><au>González-Martínez, F</au><au>Noboa, O</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Acute Antibody-Mediated Rejection in Kidney Transplant Based on the 2013 Banff Criteria: Single-Center Experience in Uruguay</atitle><jtitle>Transplantation proceedings</jtitle><addtitle>Transplant Proc</addtitle><date>2016-03-01</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>48</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>612</spage><epage>615</epage><pages>612-615</pages><issn>0041-1345</issn><eissn>1873-2623</eissn><abstract>Abstract Background Acute antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) diagnosis criteria have changed in recent consensus of Banff, with current evidence of C4d-negative AMR. Our objective was to evaluate incidence of AMR in renal transplantation according to Banff 2013 criteria and to examine the histological features and outcome. Methods This retrospective study involved all kidney transplants with histological diagnosis of acute rejection (AR) at our center between 2000 and 2014. All the biopsies with AR were re-assessed by a nephro-pathologist and classified by use of the Banff 2013 criteria. Results Of 205 kidney transplants, biopsy-proven AR was diagnosed in 25 cases (12%). Re-assessing them according to Banff 2013 criteria, AMR was diagnosed in 17 (8.3%) and represented 68% of the confirmed rejections. AMR diagnosis was performed on day 23 ± 26, with median of 11 days. From the 17 cases, 7 had concomitant T-cell–mediated rejection. All cases presented endothelial edema and acute tubular necrosis. Glomerulitis was found in 12 cases and capillaritis in 14. In 3, associated thrombotic micro-angiopathy (TMA) was found. Intimal and transmural arteritis was evidenced in 5 and 1 patient. In 2, transplant glomerulopathy was present. Seven of the 10 biopsies with C4d staining in the peri-tubular capillaries were positive. Twelve cases received plasmapheresis, 6 received gamma-globulin, and 6 received rituximab. After administration of anti-AMR therapy, 16 cases recovered renal function, reaching a serum creatinine level of 1.5 ± 0.6 mg %. Graft survival at 1 year was lower in the AMR group versus patients without AMR (81.9% vs 98.9%, log-rank test, P  &lt; .001). Risk factors for AMR were re-transplant (30% vs 7%, P  = .02), HLA-DR mismatch (1.06 ± 0.65 vs 0.7 ± 0.6, P  = .03), panel-reactive antibody (28% ± 33 vs 6.2 ± 13, P  = .00), and delayed graft function (82% vs 30%, P  = .00). Conclusions Adapting the new Banff 2013 criteria increased the sensitivity of the diagnosis of ARM. Regarding our data, despite an adequate response to the therapy, it resulted in a worse graft survival by the first year of renal transplant.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>27110014</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.transproceed.2016.03.019</doi><tpages>4</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0041-1345
ispartof Transplantation proceedings, 2016-03, Vol.48 (2), p.612-615
issn 0041-1345
1873-2623
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1784461923
source MEDLINE; Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)
subjects Adolescent
Adult
Antibody Formation - immunology
Biopsy
Delayed Graft Function - immunology
Delayed Graft Function - pathology
Delayed Graft Function - therapy
Female
gamma-Globulins - therapeutic use
Glomerulonephritis - immunology
Graft Rejection - immunology
Graft Rejection - therapy
Graft Survival - immunology
Humans
Immunoglobulins, Intravenous - therapeutic use
Immunosuppression - methods
Kidney - immunology
Kidney - pathology
Kidney Transplantation - adverse effects
Male
Middle Aged
Plasmapheresis - methods
Retrospective Studies
Risk Factors
Surgery
Transplantation Immunology - immunology
Uruguay
Young Adult
title Acute Antibody-Mediated Rejection in Kidney Transplant Based on the 2013 Banff Criteria: Single-Center Experience in Uruguay
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-22T07%3A20%3A28IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Acute%20Antibody-Mediated%20Rejection%20in%20Kidney%20Transplant%20Based%20on%20the%202013%20Banff%20Criteria:%20Single-Center%20Experience%20in%20Uruguay&rft.jtitle=Transplantation%20proceedings&rft.au=Nin,%20M&rft.date=2016-03-01&rft.volume=48&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=612&rft.epage=615&rft.pages=612-615&rft.issn=0041-1345&rft.eissn=1873-2623&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.transproceed.2016.03.019&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1784461923%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1784461923&rft_id=info:pmid/27110014&rft_els_id=1_s2_0_S0041134516003985&rfr_iscdi=true