Face masks and basketball: NCAA division I consumer trends and a review of over-the-counter face masks
Objectives/Hypothesis This study aims to: 1) determine the current consumer trends of over‐the‐counter (OTC) and custom‐made face mask usage among National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA) Division I athletic programs; and 2) provide a literature review of OTC face guards and a classified data...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | The Laryngoscope 2016-05, Vol.126 (5), p.1054-1060 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 1060 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 5 |
| container_start_page | 1054 |
| container_title | The Laryngoscope |
| container_volume | 126 |
| creator | Gandy, Jessica R. Fossett, Lela Wong, Brian J.F. |
| description | Objectives/Hypothesis
This study aims to: 1) determine the current consumer trends of over‐the‐counter (OTC) and custom‐made face mask usage among National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA) Division I athletic programs; and 2) provide a literature review of OTC face guards and a classified database.
Study Design
Literature review and survey.
Methods
Consumer trends were obtained by contacting all 352 NCAA Division I programs. Athletic trainers present in the office when called answered the following questions: 1) “When an athlete breaks his or her nose, is a custom or generic face guard used?” and 2) “What brand is the generic face guard that is used?” Data was analyzed to determine trends among athletic programs. Also, a database of OTC devices available was generated using PubMed, Google, and manufacturer Web sites.
Results
Among the 352 NCAA Division I athletic programs, 254 programs participated in the survey (72% response rate). The majority preferred custom‐made guards (46%). Disadvantages included high cost and slow manufacture turnaround time. Only 20% of the programs strictly used generic brands. For the face mask database, 10 OTC products were identified and classified into four categories based on design, with pricing ranging between $35.99 and $69.95.
Conclusion
Only a handful of face masks exist for U.S. consumers, but none of them have been reviewed or classified by product design, sport application, price, and collegiate consumer use. This project details usage trends among NCAA Division I athletic programs and provides a list of available devices that can be purchased to protect the nose and face during sports.
Level of Evidence
NA. Laryngoscope, 126:1054–1060, 2016 |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1002/lary.25584 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1784086165</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1895077710</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5254-abcfe9a0010bc2cf37d67a0bcd0b8f46fbd2e3cfb3039e9763925e13242117203</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp90ctu1DAUBmALgei0sOEBkCU2FVKK707YjQZaikZFVNw3luMci7RJXOxk2r49HtLOgkVXPpK_8-tIP0IvKDmihLA3nY23R0zKUjxCCyo5LURVycdokT95UUr2Yw_tp3RBCNVckqdojykuBK3EAvlj6wD3Nl0mbIcG13mCsbZd9xafrZZL3LSbNrVhwKfYhSFNPUQ8Rhia2VscYdPCNQ4ehw3EYvwNhQvTMGbnd9nP0BNvuwTP794D9PX4_ZfVh2L96eR0tVwXTjIpCls7D5XNh5LaMee5bpS2eW5IXXqhfN0w4M7XnPAKKq14xSRQzgSjVDPCD9DhnHsVw58J0mj6NjnoOjtAmJKhuhSkVFTJTF_9Ry_CFId8naFlJYnWmpIHlS45Z0qqrXo9KxdDShG8uYptn2sxlJhtR2bbkfnXUcYv7yKnuodmR-9LyYDO4Lrt4PaBKLNenv-8Dy3mnTaNcLPbsfHSKM21NN_PTsxH-evzu_MVMd_4XzcrqXE</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1783326560</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Face masks and basketball: NCAA division I consumer trends and a review of over-the-counter face masks</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Gandy, Jessica R. ; Fossett, Lela ; Wong, Brian J.F.</creator><creatorcontrib>Gandy, Jessica R. ; Fossett, Lela ; Wong, Brian J.F.</creatorcontrib><description>Objectives/Hypothesis
This study aims to: 1) determine the current consumer trends of over‐the‐counter (OTC) and custom‐made face mask usage among National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA) Division I athletic programs; and 2) provide a literature review of OTC face guards and a classified database.
Study Design
Literature review and survey.
Methods
Consumer trends were obtained by contacting all 352 NCAA Division I programs. Athletic trainers present in the office when called answered the following questions: 1) “When an athlete breaks his or her nose, is a custom or generic face guard used?” and 2) “What brand is the generic face guard that is used?” Data was analyzed to determine trends among athletic programs. Also, a database of OTC devices available was generated using PubMed, Google, and manufacturer Web sites.
Results
Among the 352 NCAA Division I athletic programs, 254 programs participated in the survey (72% response rate). The majority preferred custom‐made guards (46%). Disadvantages included high cost and slow manufacture turnaround time. Only 20% of the programs strictly used generic brands. For the face mask database, 10 OTC products were identified and classified into four categories based on design, with pricing ranging between $35.99 and $69.95.
Conclusion
Only a handful of face masks exist for U.S. consumers, but none of them have been reviewed or classified by product design, sport application, price, and collegiate consumer use. This project details usage trends among NCAA Division I athletic programs and provides a list of available devices that can be purchased to protect the nose and face during sports.
Level of Evidence
NA. Laryngoscope, 126:1054–1060, 2016</description><identifier>ISSN: 0023-852X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1531-4995</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/lary.25584</identifier><identifier>PMID: 26344194</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Athletes - statistics & numerical data ; Basketball ; Basketball - injuries ; Consumer Behavior - statistics & numerical data ; face guard ; Face mask ; Generic drugs ; High school sports ; Humans ; Literature reviews ; Masks ; Masks - trends ; nasal fracture ; Nose - injuries ; orthotic face mask ; over-the-counter face mask ; Sports Equipment - statistics & numerical data ; Surveys and Questionnaires ; Trends ; Universities</subject><ispartof>The Laryngoscope, 2016-05, Vol.126 (5), p.1054-1060</ispartof><rights>2015 The American Laryngological, Rhinological and Otological Society, Inc.</rights><rights>2016 The American Laryngological, Rhinological and Otological Society, Inc.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5254-abcfe9a0010bc2cf37d67a0bcd0b8f46fbd2e3cfb3039e9763925e13242117203</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5254-abcfe9a0010bc2cf37d67a0bcd0b8f46fbd2e3cfb3039e9763925e13242117203</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Flary.25584$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Flary.25584$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27903,27904,45553,45554</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26344194$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Gandy, Jessica R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fossett, Lela</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wong, Brian J.F.</creatorcontrib><title>Face masks and basketball: NCAA division I consumer trends and a review of over-the-counter face masks</title><title>The Laryngoscope</title><addtitle>The Laryngoscope</addtitle><description>Objectives/Hypothesis
This study aims to: 1) determine the current consumer trends of over‐the‐counter (OTC) and custom‐made face mask usage among National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA) Division I athletic programs; and 2) provide a literature review of OTC face guards and a classified database.
Study Design
Literature review and survey.
Methods
Consumer trends were obtained by contacting all 352 NCAA Division I programs. Athletic trainers present in the office when called answered the following questions: 1) “When an athlete breaks his or her nose, is a custom or generic face guard used?” and 2) “What brand is the generic face guard that is used?” Data was analyzed to determine trends among athletic programs. Also, a database of OTC devices available was generated using PubMed, Google, and manufacturer Web sites.
Results
Among the 352 NCAA Division I athletic programs, 254 programs participated in the survey (72% response rate). The majority preferred custom‐made guards (46%). Disadvantages included high cost and slow manufacture turnaround time. Only 20% of the programs strictly used generic brands. For the face mask database, 10 OTC products were identified and classified into four categories based on design, with pricing ranging between $35.99 and $69.95.
Conclusion
Only a handful of face masks exist for U.S. consumers, but none of them have been reviewed or classified by product design, sport application, price, and collegiate consumer use. This project details usage trends among NCAA Division I athletic programs and provides a list of available devices that can be purchased to protect the nose and face during sports.
Level of Evidence
NA. Laryngoscope, 126:1054–1060, 2016</description><subject>Athletes - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>Basketball</subject><subject>Basketball - injuries</subject><subject>Consumer Behavior - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>face guard</subject><subject>Face mask</subject><subject>Generic drugs</subject><subject>High school sports</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Literature reviews</subject><subject>Masks</subject><subject>Masks - trends</subject><subject>nasal fracture</subject><subject>Nose - injuries</subject><subject>orthotic face mask</subject><subject>over-the-counter face mask</subject><subject>Sports Equipment - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>Surveys and Questionnaires</subject><subject>Trends</subject><subject>Universities</subject><issn>0023-852X</issn><issn>1531-4995</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp90ctu1DAUBmALgei0sOEBkCU2FVKK707YjQZaikZFVNw3luMci7RJXOxk2r49HtLOgkVXPpK_8-tIP0IvKDmihLA3nY23R0zKUjxCCyo5LURVycdokT95UUr2Yw_tp3RBCNVckqdojykuBK3EAvlj6wD3Nl0mbIcG13mCsbZd9xafrZZL3LSbNrVhwKfYhSFNPUQ8Rhia2VscYdPCNQ4ehw3EYvwNhQvTMGbnd9nP0BNvuwTP794D9PX4_ZfVh2L96eR0tVwXTjIpCls7D5XNh5LaMee5bpS2eW5IXXqhfN0w4M7XnPAKKq14xSRQzgSjVDPCD9DhnHsVw58J0mj6NjnoOjtAmJKhuhSkVFTJTF_9Ry_CFId8naFlJYnWmpIHlS45Z0qqrXo9KxdDShG8uYptn2sxlJhtR2bbkfnXUcYv7yKnuodmR-9LyYDO4Lrt4PaBKLNenv-8Dy3mnTaNcLPbsfHSKM21NN_PTsxH-evzu_MVMd_4XzcrqXE</recordid><startdate>201605</startdate><enddate>201605</enddate><creator>Gandy, Jessica R.</creator><creator>Fossett, Lela</creator><creator>Wong, Brian J.F.</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201605</creationdate><title>Face masks and basketball: NCAA division I consumer trends and a review of over-the-counter face masks</title><author>Gandy, Jessica R. ; Fossett, Lela ; Wong, Brian J.F.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5254-abcfe9a0010bc2cf37d67a0bcd0b8f46fbd2e3cfb3039e9763925e13242117203</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Athletes - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>Basketball</topic><topic>Basketball - injuries</topic><topic>Consumer Behavior - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>face guard</topic><topic>Face mask</topic><topic>Generic drugs</topic><topic>High school sports</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Literature reviews</topic><topic>Masks</topic><topic>Masks - trends</topic><topic>nasal fracture</topic><topic>Nose - injuries</topic><topic>orthotic face mask</topic><topic>over-the-counter face mask</topic><topic>Sports Equipment - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>Surveys and Questionnaires</topic><topic>Trends</topic><topic>Universities</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Gandy, Jessica R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fossett, Lela</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wong, Brian J.F.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>The Laryngoscope</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Gandy, Jessica R.</au><au>Fossett, Lela</au><au>Wong, Brian J.F.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Face masks and basketball: NCAA division I consumer trends and a review of over-the-counter face masks</atitle><jtitle>The Laryngoscope</jtitle><addtitle>The Laryngoscope</addtitle><date>2016-05</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>126</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>1054</spage><epage>1060</epage><pages>1054-1060</pages><issn>0023-852X</issn><eissn>1531-4995</eissn><abstract>Objectives/Hypothesis
This study aims to: 1) determine the current consumer trends of over‐the‐counter (OTC) and custom‐made face mask usage among National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA) Division I athletic programs; and 2) provide a literature review of OTC face guards and a classified database.
Study Design
Literature review and survey.
Methods
Consumer trends were obtained by contacting all 352 NCAA Division I programs. Athletic trainers present in the office when called answered the following questions: 1) “When an athlete breaks his or her nose, is a custom or generic face guard used?” and 2) “What brand is the generic face guard that is used?” Data was analyzed to determine trends among athletic programs. Also, a database of OTC devices available was generated using PubMed, Google, and manufacturer Web sites.
Results
Among the 352 NCAA Division I athletic programs, 254 programs participated in the survey (72% response rate). The majority preferred custom‐made guards (46%). Disadvantages included high cost and slow manufacture turnaround time. Only 20% of the programs strictly used generic brands. For the face mask database, 10 OTC products were identified and classified into four categories based on design, with pricing ranging between $35.99 and $69.95.
Conclusion
Only a handful of face masks exist for U.S. consumers, but none of them have been reviewed or classified by product design, sport application, price, and collegiate consumer use. This project details usage trends among NCAA Division I athletic programs and provides a list of available devices that can be purchased to protect the nose and face during sports.
Level of Evidence
NA. Laryngoscope, 126:1054–1060, 2016</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><pmid>26344194</pmid><doi>10.1002/lary.25584</doi><tpages>7</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0023-852X |
| ispartof | The Laryngoscope, 2016-05, Vol.126 (5), p.1054-1060 |
| issn | 0023-852X 1531-4995 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1784086165 |
| source | MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete |
| subjects | Athletes - statistics & numerical data Basketball Basketball - injuries Consumer Behavior - statistics & numerical data face guard Face mask Generic drugs High school sports Humans Literature reviews Masks Masks - trends nasal fracture Nose - injuries orthotic face mask over-the-counter face mask Sports Equipment - statistics & numerical data Surveys and Questionnaires Trends Universities |
| title | Face masks and basketball: NCAA division I consumer trends and a review of over-the-counter face masks |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-22T12%3A37%3A13IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Face%20masks%20and%20basketball:%20NCAA%20division%20I%20consumer%20trends%20and%20a%20review%20of%20over-the-counter%20face%20masks&rft.jtitle=The%20Laryngoscope&rft.au=Gandy,%20Jessica%20R.&rft.date=2016-05&rft.volume=126&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=1054&rft.epage=1060&rft.pages=1054-1060&rft.issn=0023-852X&rft.eissn=1531-4995&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/lary.25584&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1895077710%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1783326560&rft_id=info:pmid/26344194&rfr_iscdi=true |