Catheter failure rates and time course with epidural versus combined spinal-epidural analgesia in labor

Highlights • We compared epidural and combined spinal-epidural failure in laboring parturients. • Catheters placed with an epidural technique were more likely to fail during labor. • Combined spinal-epidural catheters failed significantly later in labor.

Gespeichert in:

Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:	International journal of obstetric anesthesia 2016-05, Vol.26, p.4-7
Hauptverfasser:	Groden, J, Gonzalez, A, Aaronson, J, Sachs, A, Smiley, R
Format:	Artikel
Sprache:	eng
Schlagworte:	Adult Analgesia, Epidural - adverse effects Analgesia, Obstetrical - adverse effects Anesthesia & Perioperative Care Anesthesia, Spinal - adverse effects Catheterization - adverse effects Cesarean Section Combined spinal-epidural Epidural Equipment Failure Failed analgesia Female Humans Labor analgesia Obstetrics and Gynecology
Online-Zugang:	Volltext
Tags:	Tag hinzufügen Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!

container_end_page	7
container_issue
container_start_page	4
container_title	International journal of obstetric anesthesia
container_volume	26
creator	Groden, J Gonzalez, A Aaronson, J Sachs, A Smiley, R
description	Highlights • We compared epidural and combined spinal-epidural failure in laboring parturients. • Catheters placed with an epidural technique were more likely to fail during labor. • Combined spinal-epidural catheters failed significantly later in labor.
doi_str_mv	10.1016/j.ijoa.2016.01.004
format	Article
fullrecord	<record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1784086145</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0959289X1600025X</els_id><sourcerecordid>1784086145</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c411t-7d2d706338c043d22b541b88b7f1de38cc174fa9db4609b56c62eaa75c35742f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kUtv1TAUhC0EoreFP8ACeckmwW8nEkJCV0CRKrGglbqzHPukdXCSi50U9d_j6JYuuujKjzMz0vkGoXeU1JRQ9XGowzDbmpV7TWhNiHiBdlRyVnGuxUu0I61sK9a01yfoNOeBENLyRr1GJ0y1mipJduhmb5dbWCDh3oa4JsDJLpCxnTxewgjYzWvKgP-G5RbDIfg12YjvIOU1l9nYhQk8zocw2Vg9zm153UAOFocJR9vN6Q161duY4e3DeYauvn293J9XFz-__9h_uaicoHSptGdeE8V544jgnrFOCto1Tad76qH8OqpFb1vfCUXaTiqnGFirpeNSC9bzM_ThmHtI858V8mLGkB3EaCeY12yobgRpFBWySNlR6tKcc4LeHFIYbbo3lJgNsBnMBthsgA2hpgAupvcP-Ws3gn-0_CdaBJ-OAihb3gVIJrsAkwMfErjF-Dk8n__5id3FMAVn42-4hzyUNgrbsofJzBDza6t4a5iq0i6T1_wfN8iigQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1784086145</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Catheter failure rates and time course with epidural versus combined spinal-epidural analgesia in labor</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Groden, J ; Gonzalez, A ; Aaronson, J ; Sachs, A ; Smiley, R</creator><creatorcontrib>Groden, J ; Gonzalez, A ; Aaronson, J ; Sachs, A ; Smiley, R</creatorcontrib><description>Highlights • We compared epidural and combined spinal-epidural failure in laboring parturients. • Catheters placed with an epidural technique were more likely to fail during labor. • Combined spinal-epidural catheters failed significantly later in labor.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0959-289X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1532-3374</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.ijoa.2016.01.004</identifier><identifier>PMID: 26971650</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Netherlands: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Adult ; Analgesia, Epidural - adverse effects ; Analgesia, Obstetrical - adverse effects ; Anesthesia & Perioperative Care ; Anesthesia, Spinal - adverse effects ; Catheterization - adverse effects ; Cesarean Section ; Combined spinal-epidural ; Epidural ; Equipment Failure ; Failed analgesia ; Female ; Humans ; Labor analgesia ; Obstetrics and Gynecology</subject><ispartof>International journal of obstetric anesthesia, 2016-05, Vol.26, p.4-7</ispartof><rights>2016 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c411t-7d2d706338c043d22b541b88b7f1de38cc174fa9db4609b56c62eaa75c35742f3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c411t-7d2d706338c043d22b541b88b7f1de38cc174fa9db4609b56c62eaa75c35742f3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-7987-7790</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0959289X1600025X$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26971650$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Groden, J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gonzalez, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aaronson, J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sachs, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Smiley, R</creatorcontrib><title>Catheter failure rates and time course with epidural versus combined spinal-epidural analgesia in labor</title><title>International journal of obstetric anesthesia</title><addtitle>Int J Obstet Anesth</addtitle><description>Highlights • We compared epidural and combined spinal-epidural failure in laboring parturients. • Catheters placed with an epidural technique were more likely to fail during labor. • Combined spinal-epidural catheters failed significantly later in labor.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Analgesia, Epidural - adverse effects</subject><subject>Analgesia, Obstetrical - adverse effects</subject><subject>Anesthesia & Perioperative Care</subject><subject>Anesthesia, Spinal - adverse effects</subject><subject>Catheterization - adverse effects</subject><subject>Cesarean Section</subject><subject>Combined spinal-epidural</subject><subject>Epidural</subject><subject>Equipment Failure</subject><subject>Failed analgesia</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Labor analgesia</subject><subject>Obstetrics and Gynecology</subject><issn>0959-289X</issn><issn>1532-3374</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kUtv1TAUhC0EoreFP8ACeckmwW8nEkJCV0CRKrGglbqzHPukdXCSi50U9d_j6JYuuujKjzMz0vkGoXeU1JRQ9XGowzDbmpV7TWhNiHiBdlRyVnGuxUu0I61sK9a01yfoNOeBENLyRr1GJ0y1mipJduhmb5dbWCDh3oa4JsDJLpCxnTxewgjYzWvKgP-G5RbDIfg12YjvIOU1l9nYhQk8zocw2Vg9zm153UAOFocJR9vN6Q161duY4e3DeYauvn293J9XFz-__9h_uaicoHSptGdeE8V544jgnrFOCto1Tad76qH8OqpFb1vfCUXaTiqnGFirpeNSC9bzM_ThmHtI858V8mLGkB3EaCeY12yobgRpFBWySNlR6tKcc4LeHFIYbbo3lJgNsBnMBthsgA2hpgAupvcP-Ws3gn-0_CdaBJ-OAihb3gVIJrsAkwMfErjF-Dk8n__5id3FMAVn42-4hzyUNgrbsofJzBDza6t4a5iq0i6T1_wfN8iigQ</recordid><startdate>20160501</startdate><enddate>20160501</enddate><creator>Groden, J</creator><creator>Gonzalez, A</creator><creator>Aaronson, J</creator><creator>Sachs, A</creator><creator>Smiley, R</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7987-7790</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20160501</creationdate><title>Catheter failure rates and time course with epidural versus combined spinal-epidural analgesia in labor</title><author>Groden, J ; Gonzalez, A ; Aaronson, J ; Sachs, A ; Smiley, R</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c411t-7d2d706338c043d22b541b88b7f1de38cc174fa9db4609b56c62eaa75c35742f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Analgesia, Epidural - adverse effects</topic><topic>Analgesia, Obstetrical - adverse effects</topic><topic>Anesthesia & Perioperative Care</topic><topic>Anesthesia, Spinal - adverse effects</topic><topic>Catheterization - adverse effects</topic><topic>Cesarean Section</topic><topic>Combined spinal-epidural</topic><topic>Epidural</topic><topic>Equipment Failure</topic><topic>Failed analgesia</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Labor analgesia</topic><topic>Obstetrics and Gynecology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Groden, J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gonzalez, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aaronson, J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sachs, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Smiley, R</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>International journal of obstetric anesthesia</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Groden, J</au><au>Gonzalez, A</au><au>Aaronson, J</au><au>Sachs, A</au><au>Smiley, R</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Catheter failure rates and time course with epidural versus combined spinal-epidural analgesia in labor</atitle><jtitle>International journal of obstetric anesthesia</jtitle><addtitle>Int J Obstet Anesth</addtitle><date>2016-05-01</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>26</volume><spage>4</spage><epage>7</epage><pages>4-7</pages><issn>0959-289X</issn><eissn>1532-3374</eissn><abstract>Highlights • We compared epidural and combined spinal-epidural failure in laboring parturients. • Catheters placed with an epidural technique were more likely to fail during labor. • Combined spinal-epidural catheters failed significantly later in labor.</abstract><cop>Netherlands</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>26971650</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.ijoa.2016.01.004</doi><tpages>4</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7987-7790</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext	fulltext
identifier	ISSN: 0959-289X
ispartof	International journal of obstetric anesthesia, 2016-05, Vol.26, p.4-7
issn	0959-289X 1532-3374
language	eng
recordid	cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1784086145
source	MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects	Adult Analgesia, Epidural - adverse effects Analgesia, Obstetrical - adverse effects Anesthesia & Perioperative Care Anesthesia, Spinal - adverse effects Catheterization - adverse effects Cesarean Section Combined spinal-epidural Epidural Equipment Failure Failed analgesia Female Humans Labor analgesia Obstetrics and Gynecology
title	Catheter failure rates and time course with epidural versus combined spinal-epidural analgesia in labor
url	https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-05T15%3A34%3A37IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Catheter%20failure%20rates%20and%20time%20course%20with%20epidural%20versus%20combined%20spinal-epidural%20analgesia%20in%20labor&rft.jtitle=International%20journal%20of%20obstetric%20anesthesia&rft.au=Groden,%20J&rft.date=2016-05-01&rft.volume=26&rft.spage=4&rft.epage=7&rft.pages=4-7&rft.issn=0959-289X&rft.eissn=1532-3374&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.ijoa.2016.01.004&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1784086145%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1784086145&rft_id=info:pmid/26971650&rft_els_id=S0959289X1600025X&rfr_iscdi=true