No effect of femoral offset on bone implant micromotion in an experimental model

Abstract Background In total hip replacement (THR), the femoral offset (FO) is assessed preoperatively, and the surgeon must determine whether to restore, increase, or decrease the FO based on experience and the patient's clinical history. The FO is known to influence the abductor muscle streng...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Orthopaedics & traumatology, surgery & research surgery & research, 2016-05, Vol.102 (3), p.379-385
Hauptverfasser: Amirouche, F, Solitro, G, Walia, A
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 385
container_issue 3
container_start_page 379
container_title Orthopaedics & traumatology, surgery & research
container_volume 102
creator Amirouche, F
Solitro, G
Walia, A
description Abstract Background In total hip replacement (THR), the femoral offset (FO) is assessed preoperatively, and the surgeon must determine whether to restore, increase, or decrease the FO based on experience and the patient's clinical history. The FO is known to influence the abductor muscle strength, range of motion (ROM), gait, and hip pain after THR; however, the true effect of FO on bone implant micromotion is unclear. Therefore, we investigated to assess: (1) the muscle loading response during gait, (2) whether FO affects bone implant micromotion during gait. Hypothesis A variation of ± 10 mm from the anatomical FO affects the muscle loading forces. Materials and methods We modified a personalized musculoskeletal model of the lower extremity to determine the 3-dimensional contact forces at the hip joint in the presence of a stem with varying offsets during a gait cycle. A detailed finite element (FE) model was then constructed for increased, restored, and decreased FOs. The maximum load obtained during normal walking gait from the musculoskeletal model was applied to the respective FE models, and the resultant stem-bone micromotion and stress distribution were computed. Results Increasing the FO to +10 mm decreased the peak force generated by the abductor muscles during the cycle by 15.0% and decreasing the FO to −10 mm increased the von Mises stress distribution at the distal bone by 77.5% ( P < 0.05). A variation of the offset within 10 mm of the anatomical offset showed no significant differences in micromotion ( P > 0.05) and peak stresses ( P > 0.05). Discussion Coupling the musculoskeletal model of the gait cycle with FE analysis provides a realistic model to understand how FO affects bone implant micromotion. We found that there was no effect of FO on bone implant micromotion; thus, a surgeon does not need to evaluate the implications of FO on micromotion and can determine a FO that best decreases the work load of abductor muscles, increases ROM, and reduces hip pain. Level of evidence IV, biomechanical study.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.otsr.2016.01.010
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1784086094</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>1_s2_0_S1877056816000529</els_id><sourcerecordid>1784086094</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c455t-d11bb756f4067ef0b5d71b9da32a6c62c79192785055ff0c5047096e871165d63</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9UU2LFDEQDYuyX-4f8CB99DKzVZlO0g0iyOJ-wKKC7jl0pyuQsTsZk57F_fdWM6uIB6EgReW9x6tXQrxGWCOgvtyu01zyWnK_BuSCI3GKjTErULp58Vd_Is5K2QJojRt5LE6kbg00Wp-KL59SRd6Tm6vkK09Tyt3IrS_Ek1j1KVIVpt3YxbmagstpSnPgjxCrLlb0c0c5TBRnZk1poPGVeOm7sdDF83suHq4_fru6Xd1_vrm7-nC_crVS82pA7HujtK9BG_LQq8Fg3w7dRnbaaelMi600jQKlvAenoDbQamoMolaD3pyLtwfdXU4_9lRmO4XiaGSjlPbFomlqXhHamqHyAGX3pWTydseeu_xkEeySpN3aJUm7JGkBuYBJb5719_1Ewx_K7-gY8O4AIN7yMVC2xQWKjoaQOU47pPB__ff_0N0YYnDd-J2eqGzTPkfOz6It0oL9utxyOSVqAFCy3fwCVWGYyA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1784086094</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>No effect of femoral offset on bone implant micromotion in an experimental model</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><creator>Amirouche, F ; Solitro, G ; Walia, A</creator><creatorcontrib>Amirouche, F ; Solitro, G ; Walia, A</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract Background In total hip replacement (THR), the femoral offset (FO) is assessed preoperatively, and the surgeon must determine whether to restore, increase, or decrease the FO based on experience and the patient's clinical history. The FO is known to influence the abductor muscle strength, range of motion (ROM), gait, and hip pain after THR; however, the true effect of FO on bone implant micromotion is unclear. Therefore, we investigated to assess: (1) the muscle loading response during gait, (2) whether FO affects bone implant micromotion during gait. Hypothesis A variation of ± 10 mm from the anatomical FO affects the muscle loading forces. Materials and methods We modified a personalized musculoskeletal model of the lower extremity to determine the 3-dimensional contact forces at the hip joint in the presence of a stem with varying offsets during a gait cycle. A detailed finite element (FE) model was then constructed for increased, restored, and decreased FOs. The maximum load obtained during normal walking gait from the musculoskeletal model was applied to the respective FE models, and the resultant stem-bone micromotion and stress distribution were computed. Results Increasing the FO to +10 mm decreased the peak force generated by the abductor muscles during the cycle by 15.0% and decreasing the FO to −10 mm increased the von Mises stress distribution at the distal bone by 77.5% ( P &lt; 0.05). A variation of the offset within 10 mm of the anatomical offset showed no significant differences in micromotion ( P &gt; 0.05) and peak stresses ( P &gt; 0.05). Discussion Coupling the musculoskeletal model of the gait cycle with FE analysis provides a realistic model to understand how FO affects bone implant micromotion. We found that there was no effect of FO on bone implant micromotion; thus, a surgeon does not need to evaluate the implications of FO on micromotion and can determine a FO that best decreases the work load of abductor muscles, increases ROM, and reduces hip pain. Level of evidence IV, biomechanical study.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1877-0568</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1877-0568</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.otsr.2016.01.010</identifier><identifier>PMID: 26970866</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>France: Elsevier Masson SAS</publisher><subject>Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip ; Computer Simulation ; Femur ; Finite element ; Finite Element Analysis ; Gait - physiology ; Hip ; Hip contact force ; Hip Joint - physiology ; Hip offset ; Hip Prosthesis ; Humans ; Micromotion ; Models, Theoretical ; Motion ; Muscle Strength ; Muscle, Skeletal - physiology ; Musculoskeletal model ; Musculoskeletal Pain - etiology ; Orthopedics ; Range of Motion, Articular ; Surgery</subject><ispartof>Orthopaedics &amp; traumatology, surgery &amp; research, 2016-05, Vol.102 (3), p.379-385</ispartof><rights>Elsevier Masson SAS</rights><rights>2016 Elsevier Masson SAS</rights><rights>Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c455t-d11bb756f4067ef0b5d71b9da32a6c62c79192785055ff0c5047096e871165d63</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c455t-d11bb756f4067ef0b5d71b9da32a6c62c79192785055ff0c5047096e871165d63</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-0994-5724 ; 0000-0002-1061-0561 ; 0000-0002-3002-4199</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1877056816000529$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26970866$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Amirouche, F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Solitro, G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Walia, A</creatorcontrib><title>No effect of femoral offset on bone implant micromotion in an experimental model</title><title>Orthopaedics &amp; traumatology, surgery &amp; research</title><addtitle>Orthop Traumatol Surg Res</addtitle><description>Abstract Background In total hip replacement (THR), the femoral offset (FO) is assessed preoperatively, and the surgeon must determine whether to restore, increase, or decrease the FO based on experience and the patient's clinical history. The FO is known to influence the abductor muscle strength, range of motion (ROM), gait, and hip pain after THR; however, the true effect of FO on bone implant micromotion is unclear. Therefore, we investigated to assess: (1) the muscle loading response during gait, (2) whether FO affects bone implant micromotion during gait. Hypothesis A variation of ± 10 mm from the anatomical FO affects the muscle loading forces. Materials and methods We modified a personalized musculoskeletal model of the lower extremity to determine the 3-dimensional contact forces at the hip joint in the presence of a stem with varying offsets during a gait cycle. A detailed finite element (FE) model was then constructed for increased, restored, and decreased FOs. The maximum load obtained during normal walking gait from the musculoskeletal model was applied to the respective FE models, and the resultant stem-bone micromotion and stress distribution were computed. Results Increasing the FO to +10 mm decreased the peak force generated by the abductor muscles during the cycle by 15.0% and decreasing the FO to −10 mm increased the von Mises stress distribution at the distal bone by 77.5% ( P &lt; 0.05). A variation of the offset within 10 mm of the anatomical offset showed no significant differences in micromotion ( P &gt; 0.05) and peak stresses ( P &gt; 0.05). Discussion Coupling the musculoskeletal model of the gait cycle with FE analysis provides a realistic model to understand how FO affects bone implant micromotion. We found that there was no effect of FO on bone implant micromotion; thus, a surgeon does not need to evaluate the implications of FO on micromotion and can determine a FO that best decreases the work load of abductor muscles, increases ROM, and reduces hip pain. Level of evidence IV, biomechanical study.</description><subject>Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip</subject><subject>Computer Simulation</subject><subject>Femur</subject><subject>Finite element</subject><subject>Finite Element Analysis</subject><subject>Gait - physiology</subject><subject>Hip</subject><subject>Hip contact force</subject><subject>Hip Joint - physiology</subject><subject>Hip offset</subject><subject>Hip Prosthesis</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Micromotion</subject><subject>Models, Theoretical</subject><subject>Motion</subject><subject>Muscle Strength</subject><subject>Muscle, Skeletal - physiology</subject><subject>Musculoskeletal model</subject><subject>Musculoskeletal Pain - etiology</subject><subject>Orthopedics</subject><subject>Range of Motion, Articular</subject><subject>Surgery</subject><issn>1877-0568</issn><issn>1877-0568</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9UU2LFDEQDYuyX-4f8CB99DKzVZlO0g0iyOJ-wKKC7jl0pyuQsTsZk57F_fdWM6uIB6EgReW9x6tXQrxGWCOgvtyu01zyWnK_BuSCI3GKjTErULp58Vd_Is5K2QJojRt5LE6kbg00Wp-KL59SRd6Tm6vkK09Tyt3IrS_Ek1j1KVIVpt3YxbmagstpSnPgjxCrLlb0c0c5TBRnZk1poPGVeOm7sdDF83suHq4_fru6Xd1_vrm7-nC_crVS82pA7HujtK9BG_LQq8Fg3w7dRnbaaelMi600jQKlvAenoDbQamoMolaD3pyLtwfdXU4_9lRmO4XiaGSjlPbFomlqXhHamqHyAGX3pWTydseeu_xkEeySpN3aJUm7JGkBuYBJb5719_1Ewx_K7-gY8O4AIN7yMVC2xQWKjoaQOU47pPB__ff_0N0YYnDd-J2eqGzTPkfOz6It0oL9utxyOSVqAFCy3fwCVWGYyA</recordid><startdate>20160501</startdate><enddate>20160501</enddate><creator>Amirouche, F</creator><creator>Solitro, G</creator><creator>Walia, A</creator><general>Elsevier Masson SAS</general><scope>6I.</scope><scope>AAFTH</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0994-5724</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1061-0561</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3002-4199</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20160501</creationdate><title>No effect of femoral offset on bone implant micromotion in an experimental model</title><author>Amirouche, F ; Solitro, G ; Walia, A</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c455t-d11bb756f4067ef0b5d71b9da32a6c62c79192785055ff0c5047096e871165d63</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip</topic><topic>Computer Simulation</topic><topic>Femur</topic><topic>Finite element</topic><topic>Finite Element Analysis</topic><topic>Gait - physiology</topic><topic>Hip</topic><topic>Hip contact force</topic><topic>Hip Joint - physiology</topic><topic>Hip offset</topic><topic>Hip Prosthesis</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Micromotion</topic><topic>Models, Theoretical</topic><topic>Motion</topic><topic>Muscle Strength</topic><topic>Muscle, Skeletal - physiology</topic><topic>Musculoskeletal model</topic><topic>Musculoskeletal Pain - etiology</topic><topic>Orthopedics</topic><topic>Range of Motion, Articular</topic><topic>Surgery</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Amirouche, F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Solitro, G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Walia, A</creatorcontrib><collection>ScienceDirect Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Elsevier:ScienceDirect:Open Access</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Orthopaedics &amp; traumatology, surgery &amp; research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Amirouche, F</au><au>Solitro, G</au><au>Walia, A</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>No effect of femoral offset on bone implant micromotion in an experimental model</atitle><jtitle>Orthopaedics &amp; traumatology, surgery &amp; research</jtitle><addtitle>Orthop Traumatol Surg Res</addtitle><date>2016-05-01</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>102</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>379</spage><epage>385</epage><pages>379-385</pages><issn>1877-0568</issn><eissn>1877-0568</eissn><abstract>Abstract Background In total hip replacement (THR), the femoral offset (FO) is assessed preoperatively, and the surgeon must determine whether to restore, increase, or decrease the FO based on experience and the patient's clinical history. The FO is known to influence the abductor muscle strength, range of motion (ROM), gait, and hip pain after THR; however, the true effect of FO on bone implant micromotion is unclear. Therefore, we investigated to assess: (1) the muscle loading response during gait, (2) whether FO affects bone implant micromotion during gait. Hypothesis A variation of ± 10 mm from the anatomical FO affects the muscle loading forces. Materials and methods We modified a personalized musculoskeletal model of the lower extremity to determine the 3-dimensional contact forces at the hip joint in the presence of a stem with varying offsets during a gait cycle. A detailed finite element (FE) model was then constructed for increased, restored, and decreased FOs. The maximum load obtained during normal walking gait from the musculoskeletal model was applied to the respective FE models, and the resultant stem-bone micromotion and stress distribution were computed. Results Increasing the FO to +10 mm decreased the peak force generated by the abductor muscles during the cycle by 15.0% and decreasing the FO to −10 mm increased the von Mises stress distribution at the distal bone by 77.5% ( P &lt; 0.05). A variation of the offset within 10 mm of the anatomical offset showed no significant differences in micromotion ( P &gt; 0.05) and peak stresses ( P &gt; 0.05). Discussion Coupling the musculoskeletal model of the gait cycle with FE analysis provides a realistic model to understand how FO affects bone implant micromotion. We found that there was no effect of FO on bone implant micromotion; thus, a surgeon does not need to evaluate the implications of FO on micromotion and can determine a FO that best decreases the work load of abductor muscles, increases ROM, and reduces hip pain. Level of evidence IV, biomechanical study.</abstract><cop>France</cop><pub>Elsevier Masson SAS</pub><pmid>26970866</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.otsr.2016.01.010</doi><tpages>7</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0994-5724</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1061-0561</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3002-4199</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1877-0568
ispartof Orthopaedics & traumatology, surgery & research, 2016-05, Vol.102 (3), p.379-385
issn 1877-0568
1877-0568
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1784086094
source MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals
subjects Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip
Computer Simulation
Femur
Finite element
Finite Element Analysis
Gait - physiology
Hip
Hip contact force
Hip Joint - physiology
Hip offset
Hip Prosthesis
Humans
Micromotion
Models, Theoretical
Motion
Muscle Strength
Muscle, Skeletal - physiology
Musculoskeletal model
Musculoskeletal Pain - etiology
Orthopedics
Range of Motion, Articular
Surgery
title No effect of femoral offset on bone implant micromotion in an experimental model
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-30T23%3A04%3A51IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=No%20effect%20of%20femoral%20offset%20on%20bone%20implant%20micromotion%20in%20an%20experimental%20model&rft.jtitle=Orthopaedics%20&%20traumatology,%20surgery%20&%20research&rft.au=Amirouche,%20F&rft.date=2016-05-01&rft.volume=102&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=379&rft.epage=385&rft.pages=379-385&rft.issn=1877-0568&rft.eissn=1877-0568&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.otsr.2016.01.010&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1784086094%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1784086094&rft_id=info:pmid/26970866&rft_els_id=1_s2_0_S1877056816000529&rfr_iscdi=true