Comparing Foraging Behaviour of Small and Large Honey-Bee Colonies by Decoding Waggle Dances Made by Foragers
1. We compared the foraging behaviour of two small (approximately 6000 bees) and two large (approximately 20 000 bees) honey-bee colonies over 6 days. We determined where the bees of each colony foraged, whether they collected nectar or pollen, the number of patches foraged at, the number of bees en...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Functional ecology 2004-12, Vol.18 (6), p.829-835 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 835 |
---|---|
container_issue | 6 |
container_start_page | 829 |
container_title | Functional ecology |
container_volume | 18 |
creator | Beekman, M. Sumpter, D. J. T. Seraphides, N. Ratnieks, F. L. W. |
description | 1. We compared the foraging behaviour of two small (approximately 6000 bees) and two large (approximately 20 000 bees) honey-bee colonies over 6 days. We determined where the bees of each colony foraged, whether they collected nectar or pollen, the number of patches foraged at, the number of bees engaged in foraging, and the concentration of the nectar collected. 2. Even though the colonies were located in the same environment and had the same genetic background, foragers from different colonies used different forage patches. 3. Small and large colonies foraged at a similar distance in July when forage was abundant (mean foraging distance for small and large colonies was 0·67 and 0·62 km, respectively) whereas the large colonies foraged significantly further in August when forage was scarce (mean foraging distance for small and large colonies was 1·43 and 2·85 km, respectively). 4. Small colonies foraged at approximately the same number of patches as large colonies. The total number of foragers returning to the small colonies per minute was significantly lower than the number of foragers returning to the large colonies. This means that, relative to their size, small colonies foraged at more patches than large colonies. 5. The quality of the nectar collected by foragers of the small and large colonies did not differ. However, small colonies did collect more pollen than large colonies. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/j.0269-8463.2004.00924.x |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_17839960</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>3599110</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>3599110</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4444-cb55c9370d566d1a378ff4dbeb0420fc0d5a0e0ef5c5feb117be5adbb7016f63</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkMFO3DAQhq0KpC7QN-jBl3JLOo5jJ5F6gcBCpa16KFKPluOM06yceGuzLfv2OCyi187FI8_3jeWfEMogZ6k-b3MoZJPVpeR5AVDmAE1R5k_vyIpxKbKi5OKErN6g9-Qsxi0kShTFikytn3Y6jPNA1z7oYWmu8Zf-M_p9oN7SH5N2juq5pxsdBqT3fsZDdo1IW-_8PGKk3YHeoPH94v7Uw-CQ3ujZpMk33eMyflmNIV6QU6tdxA-v5zl5WN8-tPfZ5vvd1_Zqk5kyVWY6IUzDK-iFlD3TvKqtLfsOOygLsCbda0BAK4yw2DFWdSh033UVMGklPyeXx7W74H_vMT6qaYwGndMz-n1UrKp500hIYH0ETfAxBrRqF8ZJh4NioJZ41VYtyaklObXEq17iVU9J_fT6ho5GOxvSj8f4z5ecQyXqxH05cn9Hh4f_3q_Wt21qkv7xqG_jow9vOhdNwxjwZ_bGl14</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>17839960</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparing Foraging Behaviour of Small and Large Honey-Bee Colonies by Decoding Waggle Dances Made by Foragers</title><source>Wiley Online Library</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>JSTOR</source><creator>Beekman, M. ; Sumpter, D. J. T. ; Seraphides, N. ; Ratnieks, F. L. W.</creator><creatorcontrib>Beekman, M. ; Sumpter, D. J. T. ; Seraphides, N. ; Ratnieks, F. L. W.</creatorcontrib><description>1. We compared the foraging behaviour of two small (approximately 6000 bees) and two large (approximately 20 000 bees) honey-bee colonies over 6 days. We determined where the bees of each colony foraged, whether they collected nectar or pollen, the number of patches foraged at, the number of bees engaged in foraging, and the concentration of the nectar collected. 2. Even though the colonies were located in the same environment and had the same genetic background, foragers from different colonies used different forage patches. 3. Small and large colonies foraged at a similar distance in July when forage was abundant (mean foraging distance for small and large colonies was 0·67 and 0·62 km, respectively) whereas the large colonies foraged significantly further in August when forage was scarce (mean foraging distance for small and large colonies was 1·43 and 2·85 km, respectively). 4. Small colonies foraged at approximately the same number of patches as large colonies. The total number of foragers returning to the small colonies per minute was significantly lower than the number of foragers returning to the large colonies. This means that, relative to their size, small colonies foraged at more patches than large colonies. 5. The quality of the nectar collected by foragers of the small and large colonies did not differ. However, small colonies did collect more pollen than large colonies.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0269-8463</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1365-2435</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/j.0269-8463.2004.00924.x</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford, UK: British Ecological Society</publisher><subject>Animal and plant ecology ; Animal productions ; Animal, plant and microbial ecology ; Apiculture ; Apis mellifera ; Autoecology ; Bee dances ; Bees ; Biological and medical sciences ; colony size ; Forage ; Foraging ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; General aspects ; Honey bee colonies ; Honey bees ; honey‐bee ; Insect colonies ; Insect ecology ; Insecta ; Invertebrates ; Pollen ; Social insects ; Terrestrial animal productions</subject><ispartof>Functional ecology, 2004-12, Vol.18 (6), p.829-835</ispartof><rights>Copyright 2004 British Ecological Society</rights><rights>2005 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4444-cb55c9370d566d1a378ff4dbeb0420fc0d5a0e0ef5c5feb117be5adbb7016f63</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4444-cb55c9370d566d1a378ff4dbeb0420fc0d5a0e0ef5c5feb117be5adbb7016f63</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/3599110$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/3599110$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,803,1417,1433,27924,27925,45574,45575,46409,46833,58017,58250</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=16330758$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Beekman, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sumpter, D. J. T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Seraphides, N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ratnieks, F. L. W.</creatorcontrib><title>Comparing Foraging Behaviour of Small and Large Honey-Bee Colonies by Decoding Waggle Dances Made by Foragers</title><title>Functional ecology</title><description>1. We compared the foraging behaviour of two small (approximately 6000 bees) and two large (approximately 20 000 bees) honey-bee colonies over 6 days. We determined where the bees of each colony foraged, whether they collected nectar or pollen, the number of patches foraged at, the number of bees engaged in foraging, and the concentration of the nectar collected. 2. Even though the colonies were located in the same environment and had the same genetic background, foragers from different colonies used different forage patches. 3. Small and large colonies foraged at a similar distance in July when forage was abundant (mean foraging distance for small and large colonies was 0·67 and 0·62 km, respectively) whereas the large colonies foraged significantly further in August when forage was scarce (mean foraging distance for small and large colonies was 1·43 and 2·85 km, respectively). 4. Small colonies foraged at approximately the same number of patches as large colonies. The total number of foragers returning to the small colonies per minute was significantly lower than the number of foragers returning to the large colonies. This means that, relative to their size, small colonies foraged at more patches than large colonies. 5. The quality of the nectar collected by foragers of the small and large colonies did not differ. However, small colonies did collect more pollen than large colonies.</description><subject>Animal and plant ecology</subject><subject>Animal productions</subject><subject>Animal, plant and microbial ecology</subject><subject>Apiculture</subject><subject>Apis mellifera</subject><subject>Autoecology</subject><subject>Bee dances</subject><subject>Bees</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>colony size</subject><subject>Forage</subject><subject>Foraging</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>General aspects</subject><subject>Honey bee colonies</subject><subject>Honey bees</subject><subject>honey‐bee</subject><subject>Insect colonies</subject><subject>Insect ecology</subject><subject>Insecta</subject><subject>Invertebrates</subject><subject>Pollen</subject><subject>Social insects</subject><subject>Terrestrial animal productions</subject><issn>0269-8463</issn><issn>1365-2435</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2004</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNkMFO3DAQhq0KpC7QN-jBl3JLOo5jJ5F6gcBCpa16KFKPluOM06yceGuzLfv2OCyi187FI8_3jeWfEMogZ6k-b3MoZJPVpeR5AVDmAE1R5k_vyIpxKbKi5OKErN6g9-Qsxi0kShTFikytn3Y6jPNA1z7oYWmu8Zf-M_p9oN7SH5N2juq5pxsdBqT3fsZDdo1IW-_8PGKk3YHeoPH94v7Uw-CQ3ujZpMk33eMyflmNIV6QU6tdxA-v5zl5WN8-tPfZ5vvd1_Zqk5kyVWY6IUzDK-iFlD3TvKqtLfsOOygLsCbda0BAK4yw2DFWdSh033UVMGklPyeXx7W74H_vMT6qaYwGndMz-n1UrKp500hIYH0ETfAxBrRqF8ZJh4NioJZ41VYtyaklObXEq17iVU9J_fT6ho5GOxvSj8f4z5ecQyXqxH05cn9Hh4f_3q_Wt21qkv7xqG_jow9vOhdNwxjwZ_bGl14</recordid><startdate>200412</startdate><enddate>200412</enddate><creator>Beekman, M.</creator><creator>Sumpter, D. J. T.</creator><creator>Seraphides, N.</creator><creator>Ratnieks, F. L. W.</creator><general>British Ecological Society</general><general>Blackwell Science Ltd</general><general>Blackwell Science</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>C1K</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200412</creationdate><title>Comparing Foraging Behaviour of Small and Large Honey-Bee Colonies by Decoding Waggle Dances Made by Foragers</title><author>Beekman, M. ; Sumpter, D. J. T. ; Seraphides, N. ; Ratnieks, F. L. W.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4444-cb55c9370d566d1a378ff4dbeb0420fc0d5a0e0ef5c5feb117be5adbb7016f63</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2004</creationdate><topic>Animal and plant ecology</topic><topic>Animal productions</topic><topic>Animal, plant and microbial ecology</topic><topic>Apiculture</topic><topic>Apis mellifera</topic><topic>Autoecology</topic><topic>Bee dances</topic><topic>Bees</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>colony size</topic><topic>Forage</topic><topic>Foraging</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>General aspects</topic><topic>Honey bee colonies</topic><topic>Honey bees</topic><topic>honey‐bee</topic><topic>Insect colonies</topic><topic>Insect ecology</topic><topic>Insecta</topic><topic>Invertebrates</topic><topic>Pollen</topic><topic>Social insects</topic><topic>Terrestrial animal productions</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Beekman, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sumpter, D. J. T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Seraphides, N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ratnieks, F. L. W.</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><jtitle>Functional ecology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Beekman, M.</au><au>Sumpter, D. J. T.</au><au>Seraphides, N.</au><au>Ratnieks, F. L. W.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparing Foraging Behaviour of Small and Large Honey-Bee Colonies by Decoding Waggle Dances Made by Foragers</atitle><jtitle>Functional ecology</jtitle><date>2004-12</date><risdate>2004</risdate><volume>18</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>829</spage><epage>835</epage><pages>829-835</pages><issn>0269-8463</issn><eissn>1365-2435</eissn><abstract>1. We compared the foraging behaviour of two small (approximately 6000 bees) and two large (approximately 20 000 bees) honey-bee colonies over 6 days. We determined where the bees of each colony foraged, whether they collected nectar or pollen, the number of patches foraged at, the number of bees engaged in foraging, and the concentration of the nectar collected. 2. Even though the colonies were located in the same environment and had the same genetic background, foragers from different colonies used different forage patches. 3. Small and large colonies foraged at a similar distance in July when forage was abundant (mean foraging distance for small and large colonies was 0·67 and 0·62 km, respectively) whereas the large colonies foraged significantly further in August when forage was scarce (mean foraging distance for small and large colonies was 1·43 and 2·85 km, respectively). 4. Small colonies foraged at approximately the same number of patches as large colonies. The total number of foragers returning to the small colonies per minute was significantly lower than the number of foragers returning to the large colonies. This means that, relative to their size, small colonies foraged at more patches than large colonies. 5. The quality of the nectar collected by foragers of the small and large colonies did not differ. However, small colonies did collect more pollen than large colonies.</abstract><cop>Oxford, UK</cop><pub>British Ecological Society</pub><doi>10.1111/j.0269-8463.2004.00924.x</doi><tpages>7</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0269-8463 |
ispartof | Functional ecology, 2004-12, Vol.18 (6), p.829-835 |
issn | 0269-8463 1365-2435 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_17839960 |
source | Wiley Online Library; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; JSTOR |
subjects | Animal and plant ecology Animal productions Animal, plant and microbial ecology Apiculture Apis mellifera Autoecology Bee dances Bees Biological and medical sciences colony size Forage Foraging Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology General aspects Honey bee colonies Honey bees honey‐bee Insect colonies Insect ecology Insecta Invertebrates Pollen Social insects Terrestrial animal productions |
title | Comparing Foraging Behaviour of Small and Large Honey-Bee Colonies by Decoding Waggle Dances Made by Foragers |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-08T00%3A48%3A44IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparing%20Foraging%20Behaviour%20of%20Small%20and%20Large%20Honey-Bee%20Colonies%20by%20Decoding%20Waggle%20Dances%20Made%20by%20Foragers&rft.jtitle=Functional%20ecology&rft.au=Beekman,%20M.&rft.date=2004-12&rft.volume=18&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=829&rft.epage=835&rft.pages=829-835&rft.issn=0269-8463&rft.eissn=1365-2435&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/j.0269-8463.2004.00924.x&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E3599110%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=17839960&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=3599110&rfr_iscdi=true |