Repellency of deet and SS220 applied to skin involves olfactory sensing by two species of ticks
Responses of host-seeking nymphs of the blacklegged tick, Ixodes scapularis Say and lone star tick, Amblyomma americanum (Linnaeus) (Acari: Ixodidae) to the repellents N,N-diethyl-3-methylbenzamide (deet) and (1S, 2'S)-2-methylpiperidinyl-3-cyclohexene-1-carboxamide (SS220) were studied using f...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Medical and veterinary entomology 2005-03, Vol.19 (1), p.101-106 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 106 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 101 |
container_title | Medical and veterinary entomology |
container_volume | 19 |
creator | Carroll, J.F Klun, J.A Debboun, M |
description | Responses of host-seeking nymphs of the blacklegged tick, Ixodes scapularis Say and lone star tick, Amblyomma americanum (Linnaeus) (Acari: Ixodidae) to the repellents N,N-diethyl-3-methylbenzamide (deet) and (1S, 2'S)-2-methylpiperidinyl-3-cyclohexene-1-carboxamide (SS220) were studied using fingertip laboratory bioassays. Ethanol solutions of both compounds applied to the skin strongly repelled both species of ticks at 0.8 and 1.6 micromole of compound/cm2 skin. The ticks were also repelled when two layers of organdie cloth covered the portion of a finger treated with either deet or SS220. Gas chromatographic analyses of the outer layer of cloth that had covered skin treated with 1.6 micromole compound/cm2 skin revealed only 0.1 nmole SS220/cm2 cloth and 2.8 nmole deet/cm2 cloth. However, in bioassays in which a single layer of cloth was treated with a dose of deet or SS220 equivalent to the amount found in the outer layer of cloth, ticks were not repelled. Results unequivocally demonstrated that these ticks responded to the repellents in the vapour phase when repellent treated skin was covered with cloth to obviate tactile contact with them, and made it clear that the ticks detect the repellents by olfactory sensing. Heretofore, the mode of action of deet and SS220 was unclear. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/j.0269-283X.2005.00559.x |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_17835172</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>17835172</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5099-a5bb8aa4877876cd6124690a59cc4b2b1a8ff1d05c5dd2612ec9083a2b87bc553</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkMFu1DAQhi0EapfSVwCfuCXYThzbEhdUSou0LWqXFm4jx3Eq72bjEGfbzdvjkFW51pLlkfz9M5oPIUxJSuP5tE4JK1TCZPY7ZYTwNF6u0v0rtKBZwROmKH-NFs_QMXobwpoQKhRjR-iYcsEZlfkCwa3tbNPY1ozY17iydsC6rfBqxRjBuusaZys8eBw2rsWuffTNow3YN7U2g-9HHGwbXPuAyxEPTxHrrHETUOPBmU14h97Uugn29PCeoLtv5z_PLpPlj4vvZ1-WieFEqUTzspRa51IIKQpTFZTlhSKaK2PykpVUy7qmFeGGVxWLv9YoIjPNSilKw3l2gj7Ofbve_9nZMMDWBRM30631uwBUyIxTwSIoZ9D0PoTe1tD1bqv7ESiBSS6sYfIGkzeY5MI_ubCP0feHGbtya6v_wYPNCHyegSfX2PHFjeHq_jwWMZ7McRcGu3-O634DhcgEh1_XF3C1urxZFl8F3Ef-w8zX2oN-6F2AuxUjNCNECZlTkf0Focyg1Q</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>17835172</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Repellency of deet and SS220 applied to skin involves olfactory sensing by two species of ticks</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Carroll, J.F ; Klun, J.A ; Debboun, M</creator><creatorcontrib>Carroll, J.F ; Klun, J.A ; Debboun, M</creatorcontrib><description>Responses of host-seeking nymphs of the blacklegged tick, Ixodes scapularis Say and lone star tick, Amblyomma americanum (Linnaeus) (Acari: Ixodidae) to the repellents N,N-diethyl-3-methylbenzamide (deet) and (1S, 2'S)-2-methylpiperidinyl-3-cyclohexene-1-carboxamide (SS220) were studied using fingertip laboratory bioassays. Ethanol solutions of both compounds applied to the skin strongly repelled both species of ticks at 0.8 and 1.6 micromole of compound/cm2 skin. The ticks were also repelled when two layers of organdie cloth covered the portion of a finger treated with either deet or SS220. Gas chromatographic analyses of the outer layer of cloth that had covered skin treated with 1.6 micromole compound/cm2 skin revealed only 0.1 nmole SS220/cm2 cloth and 2.8 nmole deet/cm2 cloth. However, in bioassays in which a single layer of cloth was treated with a dose of deet or SS220 equivalent to the amount found in the outer layer of cloth, ticks were not repelled. Results unequivocally demonstrated that these ticks responded to the repellents in the vapour phase when repellent treated skin was covered with cloth to obviate tactile contact with them, and made it clear that the ticks detect the repellents by olfactory sensing. Heretofore, the mode of action of deet and SS220 was unclear.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0269-283X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1365-2915</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/j.0269-283X.2005.00559.x</identifier><identifier>PMID: 15752184</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford, UK; Malden, USA: Blackwell Science Ltd</publisher><subject>1S ; 2′S)-2-methylpiperidinyl-3-cyclohexene-1-carboxamide ; Amblyomma americanum ; Animals ; blacklegged tick ; Cyclohexenes ; DEET ; dose response ; fingertip bioassay ; Humans ; Insect Repellents ; Ixodes scapularis ; Ixodidae ; Ixodidae - physiology ; lone star tick ; mechanism of action ; N-diethyl-3-methylbenzamide ; olfactory repellency ; Piperidines ; repellents ; Skin ; smell ; Smell - physiology ; SS220 ; SS220, (1S ; tick control ; tick repellents ; topical application</subject><ispartof>Medical and veterinary entomology, 2005-03, Vol.19 (1), p.101-106</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5099-a5bb8aa4877876cd6124690a59cc4b2b1a8ff1d05c5dd2612ec9083a2b87bc553</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5099-a5bb8aa4877876cd6124690a59cc4b2b1a8ff1d05c5dd2612ec9083a2b87bc553</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fj.0269-283X.2005.00559.x$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fj.0269-283X.2005.00559.x$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27901,27902,45550,45551</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15752184$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Carroll, J.F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Klun, J.A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Debboun, M</creatorcontrib><title>Repellency of deet and SS220 applied to skin involves olfactory sensing by two species of ticks</title><title>Medical and veterinary entomology</title><addtitle>Med Vet Entomol</addtitle><description>Responses of host-seeking nymphs of the blacklegged tick, Ixodes scapularis Say and lone star tick, Amblyomma americanum (Linnaeus) (Acari: Ixodidae) to the repellents N,N-diethyl-3-methylbenzamide (deet) and (1S, 2'S)-2-methylpiperidinyl-3-cyclohexene-1-carboxamide (SS220) were studied using fingertip laboratory bioassays. Ethanol solutions of both compounds applied to the skin strongly repelled both species of ticks at 0.8 and 1.6 micromole of compound/cm2 skin. The ticks were also repelled when two layers of organdie cloth covered the portion of a finger treated with either deet or SS220. Gas chromatographic analyses of the outer layer of cloth that had covered skin treated with 1.6 micromole compound/cm2 skin revealed only 0.1 nmole SS220/cm2 cloth and 2.8 nmole deet/cm2 cloth. However, in bioassays in which a single layer of cloth was treated with a dose of deet or SS220 equivalent to the amount found in the outer layer of cloth, ticks were not repelled. Results unequivocally demonstrated that these ticks responded to the repellents in the vapour phase when repellent treated skin was covered with cloth to obviate tactile contact with them, and made it clear that the ticks detect the repellents by olfactory sensing. Heretofore, the mode of action of deet and SS220 was unclear.</description><subject>1S</subject><subject>2′S)-2-methylpiperidinyl-3-cyclohexene-1-carboxamide</subject><subject>Amblyomma americanum</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>blacklegged tick</subject><subject>Cyclohexenes</subject><subject>DEET</subject><subject>dose response</subject><subject>fingertip bioassay</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Insect Repellents</subject><subject>Ixodes scapularis</subject><subject>Ixodidae</subject><subject>Ixodidae - physiology</subject><subject>lone star tick</subject><subject>mechanism of action</subject><subject>N-diethyl-3-methylbenzamide</subject><subject>olfactory repellency</subject><subject>Piperidines</subject><subject>repellents</subject><subject>Skin</subject><subject>smell</subject><subject>Smell - physiology</subject><subject>SS220</subject><subject>SS220, (1S</subject><subject>tick control</subject><subject>tick repellents</subject><subject>topical application</subject><issn>0269-283X</issn><issn>1365-2915</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2005</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkMFu1DAQhi0EapfSVwCfuCXYThzbEhdUSou0LWqXFm4jx3Eq72bjEGfbzdvjkFW51pLlkfz9M5oPIUxJSuP5tE4JK1TCZPY7ZYTwNF6u0v0rtKBZwROmKH-NFs_QMXobwpoQKhRjR-iYcsEZlfkCwa3tbNPY1ozY17iydsC6rfBqxRjBuusaZys8eBw2rsWuffTNow3YN7U2g-9HHGwbXPuAyxEPTxHrrHETUOPBmU14h97Uugn29PCeoLtv5z_PLpPlj4vvZ1-WieFEqUTzspRa51IIKQpTFZTlhSKaK2PykpVUy7qmFeGGVxWLv9YoIjPNSilKw3l2gj7Ofbve_9nZMMDWBRM30631uwBUyIxTwSIoZ9D0PoTe1tD1bqv7ESiBSS6sYfIGkzeY5MI_ubCP0feHGbtya6v_wYPNCHyegSfX2PHFjeHq_jwWMZ7McRcGu3-O634DhcgEh1_XF3C1urxZFl8F3Ef-w8zX2oN-6F2AuxUjNCNECZlTkf0Focyg1Q</recordid><startdate>200503</startdate><enddate>200503</enddate><creator>Carroll, J.F</creator><creator>Klun, J.A</creator><creator>Debboun, M</creator><general>Blackwell Science Ltd</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SS</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200503</creationdate><title>Repellency of deet and SS220 applied to skin involves olfactory sensing by two species of ticks</title><author>Carroll, J.F ; Klun, J.A ; Debboun, M</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5099-a5bb8aa4877876cd6124690a59cc4b2b1a8ff1d05c5dd2612ec9083a2b87bc553</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2005</creationdate><topic>1S</topic><topic>2′S)-2-methylpiperidinyl-3-cyclohexene-1-carboxamide</topic><topic>Amblyomma americanum</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>blacklegged tick</topic><topic>Cyclohexenes</topic><topic>DEET</topic><topic>dose response</topic><topic>fingertip bioassay</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Insect Repellents</topic><topic>Ixodes scapularis</topic><topic>Ixodidae</topic><topic>Ixodidae - physiology</topic><topic>lone star tick</topic><topic>mechanism of action</topic><topic>N-diethyl-3-methylbenzamide</topic><topic>olfactory repellency</topic><topic>Piperidines</topic><topic>repellents</topic><topic>Skin</topic><topic>smell</topic><topic>Smell - physiology</topic><topic>SS220</topic><topic>SS220, (1S</topic><topic>tick control</topic><topic>tick repellents</topic><topic>topical application</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Carroll, J.F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Klun, J.A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Debboun, M</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><jtitle>Medical and veterinary entomology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Carroll, J.F</au><au>Klun, J.A</au><au>Debboun, M</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Repellency of deet and SS220 applied to skin involves olfactory sensing by two species of ticks</atitle><jtitle>Medical and veterinary entomology</jtitle><addtitle>Med Vet Entomol</addtitle><date>2005-03</date><risdate>2005</risdate><volume>19</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>101</spage><epage>106</epage><pages>101-106</pages><issn>0269-283X</issn><eissn>1365-2915</eissn><abstract>Responses of host-seeking nymphs of the blacklegged tick, Ixodes scapularis Say and lone star tick, Amblyomma americanum (Linnaeus) (Acari: Ixodidae) to the repellents N,N-diethyl-3-methylbenzamide (deet) and (1S, 2'S)-2-methylpiperidinyl-3-cyclohexene-1-carboxamide (SS220) were studied using fingertip laboratory bioassays. Ethanol solutions of both compounds applied to the skin strongly repelled both species of ticks at 0.8 and 1.6 micromole of compound/cm2 skin. The ticks were also repelled when two layers of organdie cloth covered the portion of a finger treated with either deet or SS220. Gas chromatographic analyses of the outer layer of cloth that had covered skin treated with 1.6 micromole compound/cm2 skin revealed only 0.1 nmole SS220/cm2 cloth and 2.8 nmole deet/cm2 cloth. However, in bioassays in which a single layer of cloth was treated with a dose of deet or SS220 equivalent to the amount found in the outer layer of cloth, ticks were not repelled. Results unequivocally demonstrated that these ticks responded to the repellents in the vapour phase when repellent treated skin was covered with cloth to obviate tactile contact with them, and made it clear that the ticks detect the repellents by olfactory sensing. Heretofore, the mode of action of deet and SS220 was unclear.</abstract><cop>Oxford, UK; Malden, USA</cop><pub>Blackwell Science Ltd</pub><pmid>15752184</pmid><doi>10.1111/j.0269-283X.2005.00559.x</doi><tpages>6</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0269-283X |
ispartof | Medical and veterinary entomology, 2005-03, Vol.19 (1), p.101-106 |
issn | 0269-283X 1365-2915 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_17835172 |
source | MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete |
subjects | 1S 2′S)-2-methylpiperidinyl-3-cyclohexene-1-carboxamide Amblyomma americanum Animals blacklegged tick Cyclohexenes DEET dose response fingertip bioassay Humans Insect Repellents Ixodes scapularis Ixodidae Ixodidae - physiology lone star tick mechanism of action N-diethyl-3-methylbenzamide olfactory repellency Piperidines repellents Skin smell Smell - physiology SS220 SS220, (1S tick control tick repellents topical application |
title | Repellency of deet and SS220 applied to skin involves olfactory sensing by two species of ticks |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-05T16%3A12%3A07IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Repellency%20of%20deet%20and%20SS220%20applied%20to%20skin%20involves%20olfactory%20sensing%20by%20two%20species%20of%20ticks&rft.jtitle=Medical%20and%20veterinary%20entomology&rft.au=Carroll,%20J.F&rft.date=2005-03&rft.volume=19&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=101&rft.epage=106&rft.pages=101-106&rft.issn=0269-283X&rft.eissn=1365-2915&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/j.0269-283X.2005.00559.x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E17835172%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=17835172&rft_id=info:pmid/15752184&rfr_iscdi=true |