Frequency and complications after operative fixation of clavicular fractures

Background The purpose of this study was to analyze whether a recent trend in evidence supporting operative treatment of clavicular fractures is matched with an increase in operative fixation and complication rates in the United States. Methods The American Board of Orthopaedic Surgery database was...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of shoulder and elbow surgery 2016-05, Vol.25 (5), p.e125-e129
Hauptverfasser: Navarro, Ronald A., MD, Gelber, Jonathan D., MD, Harrast, John J., MS, Seiler, John G., MD, Jackson, Kent R., MD, Garcia, Ivan A., MD
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page e129
container_issue 5
container_start_page e125
container_title Journal of shoulder and elbow surgery
container_volume 25
creator Navarro, Ronald A., MD
Gelber, Jonathan D., MD
Harrast, John J., MS
Seiler, John G., MD
Jackson, Kent R., MD
Garcia, Ivan A., MD
description Background The purpose of this study was to analyze whether a recent trend in evidence supporting operative treatment of clavicular fractures is matched with an increase in operative fixation and complication rates in the United States. Methods The American Board of Orthopaedic Surgery database was reviewed for cases with Current Procedural Terminology (American Medical Association, Chicago, IL, USA) code 23515 (clavicle open reduction internal fixation [ORIF]) from 1999 to 2010. The procedure rate for each year and the number of procedures for each candidate performing clavicle ORIF were calculated to determine if a change had occurred in the frequency of ORIF for clavicular fractures. Complication and outcome data were also reviewed. Results In 2010 vs, 1999, there were statistically significant increases in the mean number of clavicle ORIF performed among all candidates (0.89 vs. 0.13; P  
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.jse.2015.11.065
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1782217740</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>1_s2_0_S1058274615006953</els_id><sourcerecordid>1782217740</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c408t-8062d114d85313b694516e0bfb902a9dd9666f2941b586115043d1a7ff7c2393</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kUGL1TAUhYMozjj6A9xIl25a702TtEEQZHBUeODC2Yc0uYHUvvaZtA_fv5883-jChauE5JzDvd9h7DVCg4Dq3diMmRoOKBvEBpR8wq5RtrxWEuBpuYPsa94JdcVe5DwCgBbAn7MrrjQAivaa7e4S_dxodqfKzr5yy_4wRWfXuMy5smGlVC0HSuXhSFWIv37_VEuo3GSP0W2TTVVI1q1bovySPQt2yvTq8bxh93ef7m-_1Ltvn7_eftzVTkC_1j0o7hGF72WL7aC0kKgIhjBo4FZ7r5VSgWuBg-wVogTRerRdCJ3jrW5v2NtL7CEtZfa8mn3MjqbJzrRs2WDXc45dJ6BI8SJ1ack5UTCHFPc2nQyCOTM0oykMzZmhQTSFYfG8eYzfhj35v44_0Irg_UVAZcdjpGSyiwUh-ZjIrcYv8b_xH_5xuynOhfn0g06Ux2VLc4Fn0GRuwHw_l3jusGAApWXbPgBo55Xv</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1782217740</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Frequency and complications after operative fixation of clavicular fractures</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Navarro, Ronald A., MD ; Gelber, Jonathan D., MD ; Harrast, John J., MS ; Seiler, John G., MD ; Jackson, Kent R., MD ; Garcia, Ivan A., MD</creator><creatorcontrib>Navarro, Ronald A., MD ; Gelber, Jonathan D., MD ; Harrast, John J., MS ; Seiler, John G., MD ; Jackson, Kent R., MD ; Garcia, Ivan A., MD</creatorcontrib><description>Background The purpose of this study was to analyze whether a recent trend in evidence supporting operative treatment of clavicular fractures is matched with an increase in operative fixation and complication rates in the United States. Methods The American Board of Orthopaedic Surgery database was reviewed for cases with Current Procedural Terminology (American Medical Association, Chicago, IL, USA) code 23515 (clavicle open reduction internal fixation [ORIF]) from 1999 to 2010. The procedure rate for each year and the number of procedures for each candidate performing clavicle ORIF were calculated to determine if a change had occurred in the frequency of ORIF for clavicular fractures. Complication and outcome data were also reviewed. Results In 2010 vs, 1999, there were statistically significant increases in the mean number of clavicle ORIF performed among all candidates (0.89 vs. 0.13; P  &lt; .0001) and in the mean number of clavicle ORIF per candidate performing clavicle ORIF (2.47 vs. 1.20, P  &lt; .0473). The difference in the percentage of part II candidates performing clavicle ORIF from the start to the end of the study (11% vs. 36%) was significant ( P  &lt; .0001). There was a significant increase in the clavicle ORIF percentage of total cases (0.11% vs. 0.74%, P  &lt; .0001). The most common complication was hardware failure (4%). Conclusion The rate of ORIF of clavicular fractures has increased in candidates taking part II of the American Board of Orthopaedic Surgery, with a low complication rate. The increase in operative fixation during this interval may have been influenced by literature suggesting improved outcomes in patients treated with operative stabilization of their clavicular fracture.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1058-2746</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1532-6500</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2015.11.065</identifier><identifier>PMID: 26900143</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>ABOS ; Adult ; Clavicle ; Clavicle - injuries ; Clavicle - surgery ; Complications ; Databases, Factual ; Female ; Fixation ; Fracture ; Fracture Fixation, Internal - adverse effects ; Fracture Fixation, Internal - trends ; Fractures, Bone - surgery ; Humans ; Internal Fixators - adverse effects ; Male ; Open Fracture Reduction - adverse effects ; Open Fracture Reduction - trends ; Orthopedics ; Postoperative Complications - epidemiology ; Postoperative Complications - etiology ; Prosthesis Failure ; Rate ; Shoulder ; United States - epidemiology</subject><ispartof>Journal of shoulder and elbow surgery, 2016-05, Vol.25 (5), p.e125-e129</ispartof><rights>Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery Board of Trustees</rights><rights>2016 Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery Board of Trustees</rights><rights>Copyright © 2016 Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery Board of Trustees. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c408t-8062d114d85313b694516e0bfb902a9dd9666f2941b586115043d1a7ff7c2393</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c408t-8062d114d85313b694516e0bfb902a9dd9666f2941b586115043d1a7ff7c2393</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1058274615006953$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27903,27904,65309</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26900143$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Navarro, Ronald A., MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gelber, Jonathan D., MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Harrast, John J., MS</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Seiler, John G., MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jackson, Kent R., MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Garcia, Ivan A., MD</creatorcontrib><title>Frequency and complications after operative fixation of clavicular fractures</title><title>Journal of shoulder and elbow surgery</title><addtitle>J Shoulder Elbow Surg</addtitle><description>Background The purpose of this study was to analyze whether a recent trend in evidence supporting operative treatment of clavicular fractures is matched with an increase in operative fixation and complication rates in the United States. Methods The American Board of Orthopaedic Surgery database was reviewed for cases with Current Procedural Terminology (American Medical Association, Chicago, IL, USA) code 23515 (clavicle open reduction internal fixation [ORIF]) from 1999 to 2010. The procedure rate for each year and the number of procedures for each candidate performing clavicle ORIF were calculated to determine if a change had occurred in the frequency of ORIF for clavicular fractures. Complication and outcome data were also reviewed. Results In 2010 vs, 1999, there were statistically significant increases in the mean number of clavicle ORIF performed among all candidates (0.89 vs. 0.13; P  &lt; .0001) and in the mean number of clavicle ORIF per candidate performing clavicle ORIF (2.47 vs. 1.20, P  &lt; .0473). The difference in the percentage of part II candidates performing clavicle ORIF from the start to the end of the study (11% vs. 36%) was significant ( P  &lt; .0001). There was a significant increase in the clavicle ORIF percentage of total cases (0.11% vs. 0.74%, P  &lt; .0001). The most common complication was hardware failure (4%). Conclusion The rate of ORIF of clavicular fractures has increased in candidates taking part II of the American Board of Orthopaedic Surgery, with a low complication rate. The increase in operative fixation during this interval may have been influenced by literature suggesting improved outcomes in patients treated with operative stabilization of their clavicular fracture.</description><subject>ABOS</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Clavicle</subject><subject>Clavicle - injuries</subject><subject>Clavicle - surgery</subject><subject>Complications</subject><subject>Databases, Factual</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Fixation</subject><subject>Fracture</subject><subject>Fracture Fixation, Internal - adverse effects</subject><subject>Fracture Fixation, Internal - trends</subject><subject>Fractures, Bone - surgery</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Internal Fixators - adverse effects</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Open Fracture Reduction - adverse effects</subject><subject>Open Fracture Reduction - trends</subject><subject>Orthopedics</subject><subject>Postoperative Complications - epidemiology</subject><subject>Postoperative Complications - etiology</subject><subject>Prosthesis Failure</subject><subject>Rate</subject><subject>Shoulder</subject><subject>United States - epidemiology</subject><issn>1058-2746</issn><issn>1532-6500</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kUGL1TAUhYMozjj6A9xIl25a702TtEEQZHBUeODC2Yc0uYHUvvaZtA_fv5883-jChauE5JzDvd9h7DVCg4Dq3diMmRoOKBvEBpR8wq5RtrxWEuBpuYPsa94JdcVe5DwCgBbAn7MrrjQAivaa7e4S_dxodqfKzr5yy_4wRWfXuMy5smGlVC0HSuXhSFWIv37_VEuo3GSP0W2TTVVI1q1bovySPQt2yvTq8bxh93ef7m-_1Ltvn7_eftzVTkC_1j0o7hGF72WL7aC0kKgIhjBo4FZ7r5VSgWuBg-wVogTRerRdCJ3jrW5v2NtL7CEtZfa8mn3MjqbJzrRs2WDXc45dJ6BI8SJ1ack5UTCHFPc2nQyCOTM0oykMzZmhQTSFYfG8eYzfhj35v44_0Irg_UVAZcdjpGSyiwUh-ZjIrcYv8b_xH_5xuynOhfn0g06Ux2VLc4Fn0GRuwHw_l3jusGAApWXbPgBo55Xv</recordid><startdate>20160501</startdate><enddate>20160501</enddate><creator>Navarro, Ronald A., MD</creator><creator>Gelber, Jonathan D., MD</creator><creator>Harrast, John J., MS</creator><creator>Seiler, John G., MD</creator><creator>Jackson, Kent R., MD</creator><creator>Garcia, Ivan A., MD</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20160501</creationdate><title>Frequency and complications after operative fixation of clavicular fractures</title><author>Navarro, Ronald A., MD ; Gelber, Jonathan D., MD ; Harrast, John J., MS ; Seiler, John G., MD ; Jackson, Kent R., MD ; Garcia, Ivan A., MD</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c408t-8062d114d85313b694516e0bfb902a9dd9666f2941b586115043d1a7ff7c2393</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>ABOS</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Clavicle</topic><topic>Clavicle - injuries</topic><topic>Clavicle - surgery</topic><topic>Complications</topic><topic>Databases, Factual</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Fixation</topic><topic>Fracture</topic><topic>Fracture Fixation, Internal - adverse effects</topic><topic>Fracture Fixation, Internal - trends</topic><topic>Fractures, Bone - surgery</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Internal Fixators - adverse effects</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Open Fracture Reduction - adverse effects</topic><topic>Open Fracture Reduction - trends</topic><topic>Orthopedics</topic><topic>Postoperative Complications - epidemiology</topic><topic>Postoperative Complications - etiology</topic><topic>Prosthesis Failure</topic><topic>Rate</topic><topic>Shoulder</topic><topic>United States - epidemiology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Navarro, Ronald A., MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gelber, Jonathan D., MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Harrast, John J., MS</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Seiler, John G., MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jackson, Kent R., MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Garcia, Ivan A., MD</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of shoulder and elbow surgery</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Navarro, Ronald A., MD</au><au>Gelber, Jonathan D., MD</au><au>Harrast, John J., MS</au><au>Seiler, John G., MD</au><au>Jackson, Kent R., MD</au><au>Garcia, Ivan A., MD</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Frequency and complications after operative fixation of clavicular fractures</atitle><jtitle>Journal of shoulder and elbow surgery</jtitle><addtitle>J Shoulder Elbow Surg</addtitle><date>2016-05-01</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>25</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>e125</spage><epage>e129</epage><pages>e125-e129</pages><issn>1058-2746</issn><eissn>1532-6500</eissn><abstract>Background The purpose of this study was to analyze whether a recent trend in evidence supporting operative treatment of clavicular fractures is matched with an increase in operative fixation and complication rates in the United States. Methods The American Board of Orthopaedic Surgery database was reviewed for cases with Current Procedural Terminology (American Medical Association, Chicago, IL, USA) code 23515 (clavicle open reduction internal fixation [ORIF]) from 1999 to 2010. The procedure rate for each year and the number of procedures for each candidate performing clavicle ORIF were calculated to determine if a change had occurred in the frequency of ORIF for clavicular fractures. Complication and outcome data were also reviewed. Results In 2010 vs, 1999, there were statistically significant increases in the mean number of clavicle ORIF performed among all candidates (0.89 vs. 0.13; P  &lt; .0001) and in the mean number of clavicle ORIF per candidate performing clavicle ORIF (2.47 vs. 1.20, P  &lt; .0473). The difference in the percentage of part II candidates performing clavicle ORIF from the start to the end of the study (11% vs. 36%) was significant ( P  &lt; .0001). There was a significant increase in the clavicle ORIF percentage of total cases (0.11% vs. 0.74%, P  &lt; .0001). The most common complication was hardware failure (4%). Conclusion The rate of ORIF of clavicular fractures has increased in candidates taking part II of the American Board of Orthopaedic Surgery, with a low complication rate. The increase in operative fixation during this interval may have been influenced by literature suggesting improved outcomes in patients treated with operative stabilization of their clavicular fracture.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>26900143</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.jse.2015.11.065</doi></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1058-2746
ispartof Journal of shoulder and elbow surgery, 2016-05, Vol.25 (5), p.e125-e129
issn 1058-2746
1532-6500
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1782217740
source MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects ABOS
Adult
Clavicle
Clavicle - injuries
Clavicle - surgery
Complications
Databases, Factual
Female
Fixation
Fracture
Fracture Fixation, Internal - adverse effects
Fracture Fixation, Internal - trends
Fractures, Bone - surgery
Humans
Internal Fixators - adverse effects
Male
Open Fracture Reduction - adverse effects
Open Fracture Reduction - trends
Orthopedics
Postoperative Complications - epidemiology
Postoperative Complications - etiology
Prosthesis Failure
Rate
Shoulder
United States - epidemiology
title Frequency and complications after operative fixation of clavicular fractures
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-27T16%3A28%3A40IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Frequency%20and%20complications%20after%20operative%20fixation%20of%20clavicular%20fractures&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20shoulder%20and%20elbow%20surgery&rft.au=Navarro,%20Ronald%20A.,%20MD&rft.date=2016-05-01&rft.volume=25&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=e125&rft.epage=e129&rft.pages=e125-e129&rft.issn=1058-2746&rft.eissn=1532-6500&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jse.2015.11.065&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1782217740%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1782217740&rft_id=info:pmid/26900143&rft_els_id=1_s2_0_S1058274615006953&rfr_iscdi=true