Diagnostic criteria for hepatocellular carcinoma ⩽3 cm with hepatocyte-specific contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging

Current diagnostic imaging criteria for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) are dedicated to imaging with nonspecific extracellular contrast agents. This study aimed to evaluate diagnostic criteria for HCC ⩽3 cm on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) with a hepatocyte-specific contrast agent through an ince...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of hepatology 2016-05, Vol.64 (5), p.1099-1107
Hauptverfasser: Choi, Sang Hyun, Byun, Jae Ho, Lim, Young-Suk, Yu, Eunsil, Lee, So Jung, Kim, So Yeon, Won, Hyung Jin, Shin, Yong Moon, Kim, Pyo Nyun
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1107
container_issue 5
container_start_page 1099
container_title Journal of hepatology
container_volume 64
creator Choi, Sang Hyun
Byun, Jae Ho
Lim, Young-Suk
Yu, Eunsil
Lee, So Jung
Kim, So Yeon
Won, Hyung Jin
Shin, Yong Moon
Kim, Pyo Nyun
description Current diagnostic imaging criteria for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) are dedicated to imaging with nonspecific extracellular contrast agents. This study aimed to evaluate diagnostic criteria for HCC ⩽3 cm on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) with a hepatocyte-specific contrast agent through an inception cohort study. Of 291 patients with chronic liver disease and new nodules of 1-3 cm in diameter at surveillance ultrasonography, 295 solid nodules (194 HCCs, 98 benign nodules, and three other malignancies) in 198 patients with a confirmed final diagnosis or ⩾24 months follow-up were evaluated on gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI. Through univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses, various diagnostic criteria were developed by combining significant MRI findings for diagnosing HCC. The diagnostic performance of each criterion was compared with that of the European Association for the Study of the Liver (EASL) criteria. Four MRI findings (arterial-phase hyperintensity, transitional-phase hypointensity, hepatobiliary-phase hypointensity, and rim enhancement) were independently significant for diagnosis of HCC ⩽3 cm. For whole nodules, EASL criteria showed the best performance for diagnosing HCC (sensitivity, 83.5%; specificity, 81.2%). For nodules ⩽2 cm in diameter, a new criterion (arterial-phase hyperintensity and hepatobiliary-phase hypointensity) showed a significantly higher sensitivity than that of the EASL criteria (83.0% vs. 74.5%, p=0.008), without a significantly different specificity (76.7% vs. 81.1%, p=0.125). EASL criteria exhibit the best diagnostic performance for HCC ⩽3 cm on hepatocyte-specific contrast-enhanced MRI. A newly identified criterion (arterial-phase hyperintensity and hepatobiliary-phase hypointensity) may increase the diagnostic sensitivity of small (⩽2 cm) HCC.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.jhep.2016.01.018
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1781542450</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>1_s2_0_S0168827816000520</els_id><sourcerecordid>1781542450</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c358t-5e8a4979b019add5265975fe7e272dd5a3fc6a0d1d14367e263aa5e904252d903</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9UcFu1DAQtRCILoUf4IB85JJl7MSOc0FCLRSkSj20nC3XmXQdEnuxk6K98D_9CH6GL8HWtkgj2fP85o3nDSFvGWwZMPlh3I473G95vm-B5VDPyIZJgApkw56TTX5QleKtOiGvUhoBoIaueUlOuFQcJO825Pe5M3c-pMVZaqNbMDpDhxBpVjZLsDhN62QitSZa58Ns6N-HPzW1M_3llt0T67BglfZo3VBkgl-iSUuFfme8xZ7OuQWWDhFT8AWjLmPO370mLwYzJXzzeJ6S718-35x9rS6vLr6dfbqsbC3UUglUpuna7hZYZ_pecCm6VgzYIm95zk09WGmgZz1raplRWRsjsIOGC953UJ-S90fdfQw_V0yLnl0qwxmPYU2atYqJhjeiUPmRamNIKeKg9zH_Nh40A11816MuvuviuwaWQ-Wid4_66-2M_f-SJ6Mz4eORgHnKe4dR28l5Z830Aw-YxrBGnw3QTCeuQV-X1ZXNlXWC4FD_A9LLl9A</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1781542450</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Diagnostic criteria for hepatocellular carcinoma ⩽3 cm with hepatocyte-specific contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Choi, Sang Hyun ; Byun, Jae Ho ; Lim, Young-Suk ; Yu, Eunsil ; Lee, So Jung ; Kim, So Yeon ; Won, Hyung Jin ; Shin, Yong Moon ; Kim, Pyo Nyun</creator><creatorcontrib>Choi, Sang Hyun ; Byun, Jae Ho ; Lim, Young-Suk ; Yu, Eunsil ; Lee, So Jung ; Kim, So Yeon ; Won, Hyung Jin ; Shin, Yong Moon ; Kim, Pyo Nyun</creatorcontrib><description>Current diagnostic imaging criteria for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) are dedicated to imaging with nonspecific extracellular contrast agents. This study aimed to evaluate diagnostic criteria for HCC ⩽3 cm on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) with a hepatocyte-specific contrast agent through an inception cohort study. Of 291 patients with chronic liver disease and new nodules of 1-3 cm in diameter at surveillance ultrasonography, 295 solid nodules (194 HCCs, 98 benign nodules, and three other malignancies) in 198 patients with a confirmed final diagnosis or ⩾24 months follow-up were evaluated on gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI. Through univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses, various diagnostic criteria were developed by combining significant MRI findings for diagnosing HCC. The diagnostic performance of each criterion was compared with that of the European Association for the Study of the Liver (EASL) criteria. Four MRI findings (arterial-phase hyperintensity, transitional-phase hypointensity, hepatobiliary-phase hypointensity, and rim enhancement) were independently significant for diagnosis of HCC ⩽3 cm. For whole nodules, EASL criteria showed the best performance for diagnosing HCC (sensitivity, 83.5%; specificity, 81.2%). For nodules ⩽2 cm in diameter, a new criterion (arterial-phase hyperintensity and hepatobiliary-phase hypointensity) showed a significantly higher sensitivity than that of the EASL criteria (83.0% vs. 74.5%, p=0.008), without a significantly different specificity (76.7% vs. 81.1%, p=0.125). EASL criteria exhibit the best diagnostic performance for HCC ⩽3 cm on hepatocyte-specific contrast-enhanced MRI. A newly identified criterion (arterial-phase hyperintensity and hepatobiliary-phase hypointensity) may increase the diagnostic sensitivity of small (⩽2 cm) HCC.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0168-8278</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1600-0641</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jhep.2016.01.018</identifier><identifier>PMID: 26820629</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Netherlands</publisher><subject>Carcinoma, Hepatocellular - diagnosis ; Contrast Media ; Diagnosis, Differential ; Female ; Follow-Up Studies ; Gadolinium DTPA - pharmacology ; Gastroenterology and Hepatology ; Hepatocytes - pathology ; Humans ; Liver Neoplasms - diagnosis ; Magnetic Resonance Imaging - methods ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Neoplasm Staging ; Reproducibility of Results ; Retrospective Studies</subject><ispartof>Journal of hepatology, 2016-05, Vol.64 (5), p.1099-1107</ispartof><rights>European Association for the Study of the Liver</rights><rights>Copyright © 2016 European Association for the Study of the Liver. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c358t-5e8a4979b019add5265975fe7e272dd5a3fc6a0d1d14367e263aa5e904252d903</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c358t-5e8a4979b019add5265975fe7e272dd5a3fc6a0d1d14367e263aa5e904252d903</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26820629$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Choi, Sang Hyun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Byun, Jae Ho</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lim, Young-Suk</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yu, Eunsil</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, So Jung</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, So Yeon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Won, Hyung Jin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shin, Yong Moon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Pyo Nyun</creatorcontrib><title>Diagnostic criteria for hepatocellular carcinoma ⩽3 cm with hepatocyte-specific contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging</title><title>Journal of hepatology</title><addtitle>J Hepatol</addtitle><description>Current diagnostic imaging criteria for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) are dedicated to imaging with nonspecific extracellular contrast agents. This study aimed to evaluate diagnostic criteria for HCC ⩽3 cm on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) with a hepatocyte-specific contrast agent through an inception cohort study. Of 291 patients with chronic liver disease and new nodules of 1-3 cm in diameter at surveillance ultrasonography, 295 solid nodules (194 HCCs, 98 benign nodules, and three other malignancies) in 198 patients with a confirmed final diagnosis or ⩾24 months follow-up were evaluated on gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI. Through univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses, various diagnostic criteria were developed by combining significant MRI findings for diagnosing HCC. The diagnostic performance of each criterion was compared with that of the European Association for the Study of the Liver (EASL) criteria. Four MRI findings (arterial-phase hyperintensity, transitional-phase hypointensity, hepatobiliary-phase hypointensity, and rim enhancement) were independently significant for diagnosis of HCC ⩽3 cm. For whole nodules, EASL criteria showed the best performance for diagnosing HCC (sensitivity, 83.5%; specificity, 81.2%). For nodules ⩽2 cm in diameter, a new criterion (arterial-phase hyperintensity and hepatobiliary-phase hypointensity) showed a significantly higher sensitivity than that of the EASL criteria (83.0% vs. 74.5%, p=0.008), without a significantly different specificity (76.7% vs. 81.1%, p=0.125). EASL criteria exhibit the best diagnostic performance for HCC ⩽3 cm on hepatocyte-specific contrast-enhanced MRI. A newly identified criterion (arterial-phase hyperintensity and hepatobiliary-phase hypointensity) may increase the diagnostic sensitivity of small (⩽2 cm) HCC.</description><subject>Carcinoma, Hepatocellular - diagnosis</subject><subject>Contrast Media</subject><subject>Diagnosis, Differential</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Follow-Up Studies</subject><subject>Gadolinium DTPA - pharmacology</subject><subject>Gastroenterology and Hepatology</subject><subject>Hepatocytes - pathology</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Liver Neoplasms - diagnosis</subject><subject>Magnetic Resonance Imaging - methods</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Neoplasm Staging</subject><subject>Reproducibility of Results</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><issn>0168-8278</issn><issn>1600-0641</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNo9UcFu1DAQtRCILoUf4IB85JJl7MSOc0FCLRSkSj20nC3XmXQdEnuxk6K98D_9CH6GL8HWtkgj2fP85o3nDSFvGWwZMPlh3I473G95vm-B5VDPyIZJgApkw56TTX5QleKtOiGvUhoBoIaueUlOuFQcJO825Pe5M3c-pMVZaqNbMDpDhxBpVjZLsDhN62QitSZa58Ns6N-HPzW1M_3llt0T67BglfZo3VBkgl-iSUuFfme8xZ7OuQWWDhFT8AWjLmPO370mLwYzJXzzeJ6S718-35x9rS6vLr6dfbqsbC3UUglUpuna7hZYZ_pecCm6VgzYIm95zk09WGmgZz1raplRWRsjsIOGC953UJ-S90fdfQw_V0yLnl0qwxmPYU2atYqJhjeiUPmRamNIKeKg9zH_Nh40A11816MuvuviuwaWQ-Wid4_66-2M_f-SJ6Mz4eORgHnKe4dR28l5Z830Aw-YxrBGnw3QTCeuQV-X1ZXNlXWC4FD_A9LLl9A</recordid><startdate>20160501</startdate><enddate>20160501</enddate><creator>Choi, Sang Hyun</creator><creator>Byun, Jae Ho</creator><creator>Lim, Young-Suk</creator><creator>Yu, Eunsil</creator><creator>Lee, So Jung</creator><creator>Kim, So Yeon</creator><creator>Won, Hyung Jin</creator><creator>Shin, Yong Moon</creator><creator>Kim, Pyo Nyun</creator><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20160501</creationdate><title>Diagnostic criteria for hepatocellular carcinoma ⩽3 cm with hepatocyte-specific contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging</title><author>Choi, Sang Hyun ; Byun, Jae Ho ; Lim, Young-Suk ; Yu, Eunsil ; Lee, So Jung ; Kim, So Yeon ; Won, Hyung Jin ; Shin, Yong Moon ; Kim, Pyo Nyun</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c358t-5e8a4979b019add5265975fe7e272dd5a3fc6a0d1d14367e263aa5e904252d903</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Carcinoma, Hepatocellular - diagnosis</topic><topic>Contrast Media</topic><topic>Diagnosis, Differential</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Follow-Up Studies</topic><topic>Gadolinium DTPA - pharmacology</topic><topic>Gastroenterology and Hepatology</topic><topic>Hepatocytes - pathology</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Liver Neoplasms - diagnosis</topic><topic>Magnetic Resonance Imaging - methods</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Neoplasm Staging</topic><topic>Reproducibility of Results</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Choi, Sang Hyun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Byun, Jae Ho</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lim, Young-Suk</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yu, Eunsil</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, So Jung</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, So Yeon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Won, Hyung Jin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shin, Yong Moon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Pyo Nyun</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of hepatology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Choi, Sang Hyun</au><au>Byun, Jae Ho</au><au>Lim, Young-Suk</au><au>Yu, Eunsil</au><au>Lee, So Jung</au><au>Kim, So Yeon</au><au>Won, Hyung Jin</au><au>Shin, Yong Moon</au><au>Kim, Pyo Nyun</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Diagnostic criteria for hepatocellular carcinoma ⩽3 cm with hepatocyte-specific contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging</atitle><jtitle>Journal of hepatology</jtitle><addtitle>J Hepatol</addtitle><date>2016-05-01</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>64</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>1099</spage><epage>1107</epage><pages>1099-1107</pages><issn>0168-8278</issn><eissn>1600-0641</eissn><abstract>Current diagnostic imaging criteria for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) are dedicated to imaging with nonspecific extracellular contrast agents. This study aimed to evaluate diagnostic criteria for HCC ⩽3 cm on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) with a hepatocyte-specific contrast agent through an inception cohort study. Of 291 patients with chronic liver disease and new nodules of 1-3 cm in diameter at surveillance ultrasonography, 295 solid nodules (194 HCCs, 98 benign nodules, and three other malignancies) in 198 patients with a confirmed final diagnosis or ⩾24 months follow-up were evaluated on gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI. Through univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses, various diagnostic criteria were developed by combining significant MRI findings for diagnosing HCC. The diagnostic performance of each criterion was compared with that of the European Association for the Study of the Liver (EASL) criteria. Four MRI findings (arterial-phase hyperintensity, transitional-phase hypointensity, hepatobiliary-phase hypointensity, and rim enhancement) were independently significant for diagnosis of HCC ⩽3 cm. For whole nodules, EASL criteria showed the best performance for diagnosing HCC (sensitivity, 83.5%; specificity, 81.2%). For nodules ⩽2 cm in diameter, a new criterion (arterial-phase hyperintensity and hepatobiliary-phase hypointensity) showed a significantly higher sensitivity than that of the EASL criteria (83.0% vs. 74.5%, p=0.008), without a significantly different specificity (76.7% vs. 81.1%, p=0.125). EASL criteria exhibit the best diagnostic performance for HCC ⩽3 cm on hepatocyte-specific contrast-enhanced MRI. A newly identified criterion (arterial-phase hyperintensity and hepatobiliary-phase hypointensity) may increase the diagnostic sensitivity of small (⩽2 cm) HCC.</abstract><cop>Netherlands</cop><pmid>26820629</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.jhep.2016.01.018</doi><tpages>9</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0168-8278
ispartof Journal of hepatology, 2016-05, Vol.64 (5), p.1099-1107
issn 0168-8278
1600-0641
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1781542450
source MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Carcinoma, Hepatocellular - diagnosis
Contrast Media
Diagnosis, Differential
Female
Follow-Up Studies
Gadolinium DTPA - pharmacology
Gastroenterology and Hepatology
Hepatocytes - pathology
Humans
Liver Neoplasms - diagnosis
Magnetic Resonance Imaging - methods
Male
Middle Aged
Neoplasm Staging
Reproducibility of Results
Retrospective Studies
title Diagnostic criteria for hepatocellular carcinoma ⩽3 cm with hepatocyte-specific contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-09T01%3A48%3A09IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Diagnostic%20criteria%20for%20hepatocellular%20carcinoma%20%E2%A9%BD3%20cm%20with%20hepatocyte-specific%20contrast-enhanced%20magnetic%20resonance%20imaging&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20hepatology&rft.au=Choi,%20Sang%20Hyun&rft.date=2016-05-01&rft.volume=64&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=1099&rft.epage=1107&rft.pages=1099-1107&rft.issn=0168-8278&rft.eissn=1600-0641&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jhep.2016.01.018&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1781542450%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1781542450&rft_id=info:pmid/26820629&rft_els_id=1_s2_0_S0168827816000520&rfr_iscdi=true