Why Are Males Bad for Females? Models for the Evolution of Damaging Male Mating Behavior
One explanation for the cost to mating for females caused by damaging male mating behavior is that this causes the females to adaptively modify their subsequent life histories in a way that also increases male fitness. This might occur because the reduction in residual reproductive value of the fema...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | The American naturalist 2005-05, Vol.165 (S5), p.S46-S63 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | S63 |
---|---|
container_issue | S5 |
container_start_page | S46 |
container_title | The American naturalist |
container_volume | 165 |
creator | Lessells, C. M. |
description | One explanation for the cost to mating for females caused by damaging male mating behavior is that this causes the females to adaptively modify their subsequent life histories in a way that also increases male fitness. This might occur because the reduction in residual reproductive value of the female increases her optimal oviposition rate or because an increase in the current level of damage increases the female’s optimal remating interval. In this article, I present models of a stochastic dynamic game in which males choose the level of mating damage that they inflict on females and females choose their oviposition rate and whether to remate. The models show that some level of damage is always an evolutionarily stable strategy and may even provoke females into making terminal reproductive investment (and hence a semelparous life history), that nondamaging populations are always invaded by damaging male mutants, and that damage evolves because of its effect on oviposition rate and despite its effect on remating interval. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1086/429356 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_17808560</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>10.1086/429356</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>10.1086/429356</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c417t-fcaf34e5fd7c268aa5dfe030b052620e6c5806d2858904904e798017c55916f03</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkVtLwzAYhoMoOk-_QCSIeFdNmuZ0JZtncHij6F3J0i9bR7vMpB347-3cmOCNEJJ84fmekLwIHVNySYkSV1mqGRdbqEc5kwlnKdtGPUIISwjN5B7aj3HalTrTfBftUS41V4L20Mf75Av3A-ChqSDigSmw8wHfQ72sr_HQF1DFn7NmAvhu4au2Kf0Me4dvTW3G5Wz809tNzXI_gIlZlD4coh1nqghH6_UAvd3fvd48Js8vD083_efEZlQ2ibPGsQy4K6RNhTKGFw4IIyPCU5ESEJYrIopUcaVJ1g2QWhEqLeeaCkfYAbpYeefBf7YQm7wuo4WqMjPwbcyF5ELolP0LUqmI4mJpPPsDTn0bZt0jcqqV0FR1f7yx2eBjDODyeShrE75ySvJlIvkqkQ48XdvaUQ3FL7aOoAPOV0BrJ6U1Yz8PEOPvnRvPyQqbxsaHjYZlknFG2TelfpfQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>198691815</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Why Are Males Bad for Females? Models for the Evolution of Damaging Male Mating Behavior</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>Lessells, C. M.</creator><creatorcontrib>Lessells, C. M.</creatorcontrib><description>One explanation for the cost to mating for females caused by damaging male mating behavior is that this causes the females to adaptively modify their subsequent life histories in a way that also increases male fitness. This might occur because the reduction in residual reproductive value of the female increases her optimal oviposition rate or because an increase in the current level of damage increases the female’s optimal remating interval. In this article, I present models of a stochastic dynamic game in which males choose the level of mating damage that they inflict on females and females choose their oviposition rate and whether to remate. The models show that some level of damage is always an evolutionarily stable strategy and may even provoke females into making terminal reproductive investment (and hence a semelparous life history), that nondamaging populations are always invaded by damaging male mutants, and that damage evolves because of its effect on oviposition rate and despite its effect on remating interval.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0003-0147</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1537-5323</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1086/429356</identifier><identifier>PMID: 15795861</identifier><identifier>CODEN: AMNTA4</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: The University of Chicago Press</publisher><subject>Animal behavior ; Animals ; Biological Evolution ; Comparative analysis ; Ecological competition ; Egg fertility ; Eggs ; Evolution ; Evolutionary biology ; Female ; Female animals ; Female fertility ; Females ; Longevity ; Male ; Male animals ; Males ; Mating behavior ; Models, Biological ; Models, Statistical ; Musical intervals ; Oviposition ; Reproduction - genetics ; Reproduction - physiology ; Sex Characteristics ; Sexual Behavior, Animal - physiology</subject><ispartof>The American naturalist, 2005-05, Vol.165 (S5), p.S46-S63</ispartof><rights>2005 by The University of Chicago.</rights><rights>Copyright University of Chicago, acting through its Press May 2005</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c417t-fcaf34e5fd7c268aa5dfe030b052620e6c5806d2858904904e798017c55916f03</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c417t-fcaf34e5fd7c268aa5dfe030b052620e6c5806d2858904904e798017c55916f03</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,803,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15795861$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Lessells, C. M.</creatorcontrib><title>Why Are Males Bad for Females? Models for the Evolution of Damaging Male Mating Behavior</title><title>The American naturalist</title><addtitle>Am Nat</addtitle><description>One explanation for the cost to mating for females caused by damaging male mating behavior is that this causes the females to adaptively modify their subsequent life histories in a way that also increases male fitness. This might occur because the reduction in residual reproductive value of the female increases her optimal oviposition rate or because an increase in the current level of damage increases the female’s optimal remating interval. In this article, I present models of a stochastic dynamic game in which males choose the level of mating damage that they inflict on females and females choose their oviposition rate and whether to remate. The models show that some level of damage is always an evolutionarily stable strategy and may even provoke females into making terminal reproductive investment (and hence a semelparous life history), that nondamaging populations are always invaded by damaging male mutants, and that damage evolves because of its effect on oviposition rate and despite its effect on remating interval.</description><subject>Animal behavior</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Biological Evolution</subject><subject>Comparative analysis</subject><subject>Ecological competition</subject><subject>Egg fertility</subject><subject>Eggs</subject><subject>Evolution</subject><subject>Evolutionary biology</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Female animals</subject><subject>Female fertility</subject><subject>Females</subject><subject>Longevity</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Male animals</subject><subject>Males</subject><subject>Mating behavior</subject><subject>Models, Biological</subject><subject>Models, Statistical</subject><subject>Musical intervals</subject><subject>Oviposition</subject><subject>Reproduction - genetics</subject><subject>Reproduction - physiology</subject><subject>Sex Characteristics</subject><subject>Sexual Behavior, Animal - physiology</subject><issn>0003-0147</issn><issn>1537-5323</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2005</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkVtLwzAYhoMoOk-_QCSIeFdNmuZ0JZtncHij6F3J0i9bR7vMpB347-3cmOCNEJJ84fmekLwIHVNySYkSV1mqGRdbqEc5kwlnKdtGPUIISwjN5B7aj3HalTrTfBftUS41V4L20Mf75Av3A-ChqSDigSmw8wHfQ72sr_HQF1DFn7NmAvhu4au2Kf0Me4dvTW3G5Wz809tNzXI_gIlZlD4coh1nqghH6_UAvd3fvd48Js8vD083_efEZlQ2ibPGsQy4K6RNhTKGFw4IIyPCU5ESEJYrIopUcaVJ1g2QWhEqLeeaCkfYAbpYeefBf7YQm7wuo4WqMjPwbcyF5ELolP0LUqmI4mJpPPsDTn0bZt0jcqqV0FR1f7yx2eBjDODyeShrE75ySvJlIvkqkQ48XdvaUQ3FL7aOoAPOV0BrJ6U1Yz8PEOPvnRvPyQqbxsaHjYZlknFG2TelfpfQ</recordid><startdate>200505</startdate><enddate>200505</enddate><creator>Lessells, C. M.</creator><general>The University of Chicago Press</general><general>University of Chicago, acting through its Press</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200505</creationdate><title>Why Are Males Bad for Females? Models for the Evolution of Damaging Male Mating Behavior</title><author>Lessells, C. M.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c417t-fcaf34e5fd7c268aa5dfe030b052620e6c5806d2858904904e798017c55916f03</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2005</creationdate><topic>Animal behavior</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Biological Evolution</topic><topic>Comparative analysis</topic><topic>Ecological competition</topic><topic>Egg fertility</topic><topic>Eggs</topic><topic>Evolution</topic><topic>Evolutionary biology</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Female animals</topic><topic>Female fertility</topic><topic>Females</topic><topic>Longevity</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Male animals</topic><topic>Males</topic><topic>Mating behavior</topic><topic>Models, Biological</topic><topic>Models, Statistical</topic><topic>Musical intervals</topic><topic>Oviposition</topic><topic>Reproduction - genetics</topic><topic>Reproduction - physiology</topic><topic>Sex Characteristics</topic><topic>Sexual Behavior, Animal - physiology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Lessells, C. M.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>The American naturalist</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Lessells, C. M.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Why Are Males Bad for Females? Models for the Evolution of Damaging Male Mating Behavior</atitle><jtitle>The American naturalist</jtitle><addtitle>Am Nat</addtitle><date>2005-05</date><risdate>2005</risdate><volume>165</volume><issue>S5</issue><spage>S46</spage><epage>S63</epage><pages>S46-S63</pages><issn>0003-0147</issn><eissn>1537-5323</eissn><coden>AMNTA4</coden><abstract>One explanation for the cost to mating for females caused by damaging male mating behavior is that this causes the females to adaptively modify their subsequent life histories in a way that also increases male fitness. This might occur because the reduction in residual reproductive value of the female increases her optimal oviposition rate or because an increase in the current level of damage increases the female’s optimal remating interval. In this article, I present models of a stochastic dynamic game in which males choose the level of mating damage that they inflict on females and females choose their oviposition rate and whether to remate. The models show that some level of damage is always an evolutionarily stable strategy and may even provoke females into making terminal reproductive investment (and hence a semelparous life history), that nondamaging populations are always invaded by damaging male mutants, and that damage evolves because of its effect on oviposition rate and despite its effect on remating interval.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>The University of Chicago Press</pub><pmid>15795861</pmid><doi>10.1086/429356</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0003-0147 |
ispartof | The American naturalist, 2005-05, Vol.165 (S5), p.S46-S63 |
issn | 0003-0147 1537-5323 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_17808560 |
source | MEDLINE; JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals |
subjects | Animal behavior Animals Biological Evolution Comparative analysis Ecological competition Egg fertility Eggs Evolution Evolutionary biology Female Female animals Female fertility Females Longevity Male Male animals Males Mating behavior Models, Biological Models, Statistical Musical intervals Oviposition Reproduction - genetics Reproduction - physiology Sex Characteristics Sexual Behavior, Animal - physiology |
title | Why Are Males Bad for Females? Models for the Evolution of Damaging Male Mating Behavior |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-25T01%3A31%3A37IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Why%20Are%20Males%20Bad%20for%20Females?%20Models%20for%20the%20Evolution%20of%20Damaging%20Male%20Mating%20Behavior&rft.jtitle=The%20American%20naturalist&rft.au=Lessells,%20C.%C2%A0M.&rft.date=2005-05&rft.volume=165&rft.issue=S5&rft.spage=S46&rft.epage=S63&rft.pages=S46-S63&rft.issn=0003-0147&rft.eissn=1537-5323&rft.coden=AMNTA4&rft_id=info:doi/10.1086/429356&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E10.1086/429356%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=198691815&rft_id=info:pmid/15795861&rft_jstor_id=10.1086/429356&rfr_iscdi=true |