Tensions between the conduct of randomised controlled trials in health promotion research and the role of autonomy in human health and well being
The goal of developing increasingly effective interventions to change health-related behaviours, which is an inevitable result of the use of the scientific method, conflicts with respect for the autonomy and dignity of the individual. This paper recommends a new direction for the field of health pro...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Health promotion journal of Australia 2015-12, Vol.26 (3), p.263-268 |
|---|---|
| 1. Verfasser: | |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 268 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 3 |
| container_start_page | 263 |
| container_title | Health promotion journal of Australia |
| container_volume | 26 |
| creator | Buchanan, David R. |
| description | The goal of developing increasingly effective interventions to change health-related behaviours, which is an inevitable result of the use of the scientific method, conflicts with respect for the autonomy and dignity of the individual. This paper recommends a new direction for the field of health promotion based on building people's capacity to exercise autonomy, in the ethically relevant meaning of the term, and thereby promote a more comprehensive understanding of the goals of the field, a state of health that includes the irreducible ethical dimension signified by human dignity. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1071/HE15032 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_rmit_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1780536075</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><informt_id>10.3316/ielapa.749776260408780</informt_id><sourcerecordid>3989542671</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c6243-f0b109279ede7504b5822416163d2254ed706f33d6554c74c47d7017a8a9fb343</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqVkc9u1DAQhyMEoktBvAGKxKFcAv7v5FhVhaWqBIfC1XIcp-tVYi-2o9U-Bm_MZHdboUoV5WTL882nGf-K4i1GHzGS-NPyEnNEybNiQQjCFRZYPi8WGFFRQZ2eFK9SWiOEG47ql8UJEVw0tMGL4veN9ckFn8rW5q21vswrW5rgu8nkMvRl1L4Lo0u2m19zDMMA1xydHlLpfLmyesirchPDGDKIymiT1dGsSmjcy6DFziY95eDDuNt3TaO-753BrR0GGMH529fFix7c9s3xPC1-fL68uVhW19--fL04v66MIIxWPWoxaohsbGclR6zlNSEMFhe0I4Qz20kkeko7wTkzkhkm4QVLXeumbymjp8WHgxdG_zXZlBVsaWAM7W2YksKyFhxLLORTUMSpQJI_AeUwD-J1A-j7B-g6TNHDzkBJRlDT4Fl4dqBMDClF26tNdKOOO4WRmrNXx-yBfHf0Te1ou3vuLmwAqgOwdYPdPeZRy-9X54gICvzPAx9Hl5WZkzdzxGmtc1KHlJXzfdjXQ7xVXXBKt2lWUoqFcnbQG60ka6QURCCGavgqEC__EgPR50d1_1Rd_b_qrvBQ9gc3DQVc</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1774209915</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Tensions between the conduct of randomised controlled trials in health promotion research and the role of autonomy in human health and well being</title><source>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><source>PAIS Index</source><creator>Buchanan, David R.</creator><creatorcontrib>Buchanan, David R.</creatorcontrib><description>The goal of developing increasingly effective interventions to change health-related behaviours, which is an inevitable result of the use of the scientific method, conflicts with respect for the autonomy and dignity of the individual. This paper recommends a new direction for the field of health promotion based on building people's capacity to exercise autonomy, in the ethically relevant meaning of the term, and thereby promote a more comprehensive understanding of the goals of the field, a state of health that includes the irreducible ethical dimension signified by human dignity.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1036-1073</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2201-1617</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1071/HE15032</identifier><identifier>PMID: 26569391</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Australia: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Allied health personnel ; Autonomy ; Autonomy (Psychology) ; Behavior ; Behavior change ; Behaviorism (Psychology) ; behavioural science theory ; Capacity building approach ; Chronic illnesses ; Design ; Disease ; Ethics ; Exercise ; Funding ; Health ; Health behavior ; Health care policy ; Health education ; Health promotion ; Health Promotion - ethics ; Health Promotion - methods ; Health sciences ; Health status ; Human dignity ; Humans ; Hypotheses ; Meaning ; Medical research ; Methodology ; Mortality ; Personal Autonomy ; Physical fitness ; Professional ethics ; Promotion ; Public health ; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic - ethics ; Research Design ; Research methodology ; Researchers ; Scientific method ; Scientists ; Social aspects ; Social welfare ; Studies ; Success ; Validity ; Values ; Well being</subject><ispartof>Health promotion journal of Australia, 2015-12, Vol.26 (3), p.263-268</ispartof><rights>2015 Australian Health Promotion Association Ltd</rights><rights>Copyright CSIRO 2015</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c6243-f0b109279ede7504b5822416163d2254ed706f33d6554c74c47d7017a8a9fb343</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c6243-f0b109279ede7504b5822416163d2254ed706f33d6554c74c47d7017a8a9fb343</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1071%2FHE15032$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1071%2FHE15032$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,12825,27843,27901,27902,30976,45550,45551</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26569391$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Buchanan, David R.</creatorcontrib><title>Tensions between the conduct of randomised controlled trials in health promotion research and the role of autonomy in human health and well being</title><title>Health promotion journal of Australia</title><addtitle>Health Promot J Austr</addtitle><description>The goal of developing increasingly effective interventions to change health-related behaviours, which is an inevitable result of the use of the scientific method, conflicts with respect for the autonomy and dignity of the individual. This paper recommends a new direction for the field of health promotion based on building people's capacity to exercise autonomy, in the ethically relevant meaning of the term, and thereby promote a more comprehensive understanding of the goals of the field, a state of health that includes the irreducible ethical dimension signified by human dignity.</description><subject>Allied health personnel</subject><subject>Autonomy</subject><subject>Autonomy (Psychology)</subject><subject>Behavior</subject><subject>Behavior change</subject><subject>Behaviorism (Psychology)</subject><subject>behavioural science theory</subject><subject>Capacity building approach</subject><subject>Chronic illnesses</subject><subject>Design</subject><subject>Disease</subject><subject>Ethics</subject><subject>Exercise</subject><subject>Funding</subject><subject>Health</subject><subject>Health behavior</subject><subject>Health care policy</subject><subject>Health education</subject><subject>Health promotion</subject><subject>Health Promotion - ethics</subject><subject>Health Promotion - methods</subject><subject>Health sciences</subject><subject>Health status</subject><subject>Human dignity</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Hypotheses</subject><subject>Meaning</subject><subject>Medical research</subject><subject>Methodology</subject><subject>Mortality</subject><subject>Personal Autonomy</subject><subject>Physical fitness</subject><subject>Professional ethics</subject><subject>Promotion</subject><subject>Public health</subject><subject>Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic - ethics</subject><subject>Research Design</subject><subject>Research methodology</subject><subject>Researchers</subject><subject>Scientific method</subject><subject>Scientists</subject><subject>Social aspects</subject><subject>Social welfare</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Success</subject><subject>Validity</subject><subject>Values</subject><subject>Well being</subject><issn>1036-1073</issn><issn>2201-1617</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><sourceid>7TQ</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNqVkc9u1DAQhyMEoktBvAGKxKFcAv7v5FhVhaWqBIfC1XIcp-tVYi-2o9U-Bm_MZHdboUoV5WTL882nGf-K4i1GHzGS-NPyEnNEybNiQQjCFRZYPi8WGFFRQZ2eFK9SWiOEG47ql8UJEVw0tMGL4veN9ckFn8rW5q21vswrW5rgu8nkMvRl1L4Lo0u2m19zDMMA1xydHlLpfLmyesirchPDGDKIymiT1dGsSmjcy6DFziY95eDDuNt3TaO-753BrR0GGMH529fFix7c9s3xPC1-fL68uVhW19--fL04v66MIIxWPWoxaohsbGclR6zlNSEMFhe0I4Qz20kkeko7wTkzkhkm4QVLXeumbymjp8WHgxdG_zXZlBVsaWAM7W2YksKyFhxLLORTUMSpQJI_AeUwD-J1A-j7B-g6TNHDzkBJRlDT4Fl4dqBMDClF26tNdKOOO4WRmrNXx-yBfHf0Te1ou3vuLmwAqgOwdYPdPeZRy-9X54gICvzPAx9Hl5WZkzdzxGmtc1KHlJXzfdjXQ7xVXXBKt2lWUoqFcnbQG60ka6QURCCGavgqEC__EgPR50d1_1Rd_b_qrvBQ9gc3DQVc</recordid><startdate>201512</startdate><enddate>201512</enddate><creator>Buchanan, David R.</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7TQ</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88C</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AN0</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DHY</scope><scope>DON</scope><scope>DPSOV</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>HEHIP</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>KC-</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M0T</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2L</scope><scope>M2S</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>ASE</scope><scope>FPQ</scope><scope>K6X</scope><scope>7T2</scope><scope>7U2</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201512</creationdate><title>Tensions between the conduct of randomised controlled trials in health promotion research and the role of autonomy in human health and well being</title><author>Buchanan, David R.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c6243-f0b109279ede7504b5822416163d2254ed706f33d6554c74c47d7017a8a9fb343</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Allied health personnel</topic><topic>Autonomy</topic><topic>Autonomy (Psychology)</topic><topic>Behavior</topic><topic>Behavior change</topic><topic>Behaviorism (Psychology)</topic><topic>behavioural science theory</topic><topic>Capacity building approach</topic><topic>Chronic illnesses</topic><topic>Design</topic><topic>Disease</topic><topic>Ethics</topic><topic>Exercise</topic><topic>Funding</topic><topic>Health</topic><topic>Health behavior</topic><topic>Health care policy</topic><topic>Health education</topic><topic>Health promotion</topic><topic>Health Promotion - ethics</topic><topic>Health Promotion - methods</topic><topic>Health sciences</topic><topic>Health status</topic><topic>Human dignity</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Hypotheses</topic><topic>Meaning</topic><topic>Medical research</topic><topic>Methodology</topic><topic>Mortality</topic><topic>Personal Autonomy</topic><topic>Physical fitness</topic><topic>Professional ethics</topic><topic>Promotion</topic><topic>Public health</topic><topic>Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic - ethics</topic><topic>Research Design</topic><topic>Research methodology</topic><topic>Researchers</topic><topic>Scientific method</topic><topic>Scientists</topic><topic>Social aspects</topic><topic>Social welfare</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Success</topic><topic>Validity</topic><topic>Values</topic><topic>Well being</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Buchanan, David R.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>Proquest Nursing & Allied Health Source</collection><collection>PAIS Index</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>British Nursing Database</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>PAIS International</collection><collection>PAIS International (Ovid)</collection><collection>Politics Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Sociology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Politics Collection</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Political Science Database</collection><collection>Sociology Database (ProQuest)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><collection>British Nursing Index (BNI) (1985 to Present)</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><collection>Health and Safety Science Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Safety Science and Risk</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Health promotion journal of Australia</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Buchanan, David R.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Tensions between the conduct of randomised controlled trials in health promotion research and the role of autonomy in human health and well being</atitle><jtitle>Health promotion journal of Australia</jtitle><addtitle>Health Promot J Austr</addtitle><date>2015-12</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>26</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>263</spage><epage>268</epage><pages>263-268</pages><issn>1036-1073</issn><eissn>2201-1617</eissn><abstract>The goal of developing increasingly effective interventions to change health-related behaviours, which is an inevitable result of the use of the scientific method, conflicts with respect for the autonomy and dignity of the individual. This paper recommends a new direction for the field of health promotion based on building people's capacity to exercise autonomy, in the ethically relevant meaning of the term, and thereby promote a more comprehensive understanding of the goals of the field, a state of health that includes the irreducible ethical dimension signified by human dignity.</abstract><cop>Australia</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><pmid>26569391</pmid><doi>10.1071/HE15032</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 1036-1073 |
| ispartof | Health promotion journal of Australia, 2015-12, Vol.26 (3), p.263-268 |
| issn | 1036-1073 2201-1617 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1780536075 |
| source | Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete; PAIS Index |
| subjects | Allied health personnel Autonomy Autonomy (Psychology) Behavior Behavior change Behaviorism (Psychology) behavioural science theory Capacity building approach Chronic illnesses Design Disease Ethics Exercise Funding Health Health behavior Health care policy Health education Health promotion Health Promotion - ethics Health Promotion - methods Health sciences Health status Human dignity Humans Hypotheses Meaning Medical research Methodology Mortality Personal Autonomy Physical fitness Professional ethics Promotion Public health Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic - ethics Research Design Research methodology Researchers Scientific method Scientists Social aspects Social welfare Studies Success Validity Values Well being |
| title | Tensions between the conduct of randomised controlled trials in health promotion research and the role of autonomy in human health and well being |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-30T13%3A44%3A23IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_rmit_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Tensions%20between%20the%20conduct%20of%20randomised%20controlled%20trials%20in%20health%20promotion%20research%20and%20the%20role%20of%20autonomy%20in%20human%20health%20and%20well%20being&rft.jtitle=Health%20promotion%20journal%20of%20Australia&rft.au=Buchanan,%20David%20R.&rft.date=2015-12&rft.volume=26&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=263&rft.epage=268&rft.pages=263-268&rft.issn=1036-1073&rft.eissn=2201-1617&rft_id=info:doi/10.1071/HE15032&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_rmit_%3E3989542671%3C/proquest_rmit_%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1774209915&rft_id=info:pmid/26569391&rft_informt_id=10.3316/ielapa.749776260408780&rfr_iscdi=true |