Density, distribution, and genetic structure of grizzly bears in the Cabinet-Yaak Ecosystem

The conservation status of the 2 threatened grizzly bear (Ursus arctos) populations in the Cabinet-Yaak Ecosystem (CYE) of northern Montana and Idaho had remained unchanged since designation in 1975; however, the current demographic status of these populations was uncertain. No rigorous data on popu...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The Journal of wildlife management 2016-02, Vol.80 (2), p.314-331
Hauptverfasser: Kendall, Katherine C., Macleod, Amy C., Boyd, Kristina L., Boulanger, John, Royle, J. Andrew, Kasworm, Wayne F., Paetkau, David, Proctor, Michael F., Annis, Kim, Graves, Tabitha A.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 331
container_issue 2
container_start_page 314
container_title The Journal of wildlife management
container_volume 80
creator Kendall, Katherine C.
Macleod, Amy C.
Boyd, Kristina L.
Boulanger, John
Royle, J. Andrew
Kasworm, Wayne F.
Paetkau, David
Proctor, Michael F.
Annis, Kim
Graves, Tabitha A.
description The conservation status of the 2 threatened grizzly bear (Ursus arctos) populations in the Cabinet-Yaak Ecosystem (CYE) of northern Montana and Idaho had remained unchanged since designation in 1975; however, the current demographic status of these populations was uncertain. No rigorous data on population density and distribution or analysis of recent population genetic structure were available to measure the effectiveness of conservation efforts. We used genetic detection data from hair corral, bear rub, and opportunistic sampling in traditional and spatial capture—recapture models to generate estimates of abundance and density of grizzly bears in the CYE. We calculated mean bear residency on our sampling grid from telemetry data using Huggins and Pledger models to estimate the average number of bears present and to correct our superpopulation estimates for lack of geographic closure. Estimated grizzly bear abundance (all sex and age classes) in the CYE in 2012 was 48–50 bears, approximately half the population recovery goal. Grizzly bear density in the CYE (4.3–4.5 grizzly bears/1,000 km2) was among the lowest of interior North American populations. The sizes of the Cabinet (n = 22–24) and Yaak (n = 18–22) populations were similar. Spatial models produced similar estimates of abundance and density with comparable precision without requiring radio-telemetry data to address assumptions of geographic closure. The 2 populations in the CYE were demographically and reproductively isolated from each other and the Cabinet population was highly inbred. With parentage analysis, we documented natural migrants to the Cabinet and Yaak populations by bears born to parents in the Selkirk and Northern Continental Divide populations. These events supported data from other sources suggesting that the expansion of neighboring populations may eventually help sustain the CYE populations. However, the small size, isolation, and inbreeding documented by this study demonstrate the need for comprehensive management designed to support CYE population growth and increased connectivity and gene flow with other populations. Published 2015. This article is a U.S. Government work and is in the public domain in the USA.
doi_str_mv 10.1002/jwmg.1019
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1780528583</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>24764960</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>24764960</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4609-ac8f828c15c4b935a1a4de2596af2f8c8e41e0af287bed4d97f5825d9242578a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kUFv1DAQhS0EEkvhwA9AssQFpIbajh3bR7S0C6sCaikqiIPlOJPF22zS2o5K-uvxKlUPSJxmNO97o9EbhF5S8o4Swo62t7tN7qh-hBZUl7JgisrHaJE1VghOfzxFz2LcElJSqqoF-vUB-ujTdIgbH1Pw9Zj80B9i2zd4Az0k73Cejy6NAfDQ4k3wd3fdhGuwIWLf4_Qb8NLWPrPFT2uv8LEb4hQT7J6jJ63tIry4rwfo-8nxxfJjcfp19Wn5_rRwvCK6sE61iilHheO1LoWlljfAhK5sy1rlFHAKJPdK1tDwRstWKCYazTgTUtnyAL2Z916H4WaEmMzORwddZ3sYxmioVEQwJVSZ0df_oNthDH2-LlMVUbzUSmXq7Uy5MMQYoDXXwe9smAwlZh-z2cds9jFn9mhmb30H0_9Bs778vLp3vJod25iG8OBgXFZcVyTrxaznh8CfB92GK1PJUgpz-WVl1hfy7NuaL815-RfaI5gZ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1760843988</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Density, distribution, and genetic structure of grizzly bears in the Cabinet-Yaak Ecosystem</title><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Kendall, Katherine C. ; Macleod, Amy C. ; Boyd, Kristina L. ; Boulanger, John ; Royle, J. Andrew ; Kasworm, Wayne F. ; Paetkau, David ; Proctor, Michael F. ; Annis, Kim ; Graves, Tabitha A.</creator><creatorcontrib>Kendall, Katherine C. ; Macleod, Amy C. ; Boyd, Kristina L. ; Boulanger, John ; Royle, J. Andrew ; Kasworm, Wayne F. ; Paetkau, David ; Proctor, Michael F. ; Annis, Kim ; Graves, Tabitha A.</creatorcontrib><description>The conservation status of the 2 threatened grizzly bear (Ursus arctos) populations in the Cabinet-Yaak Ecosystem (CYE) of northern Montana and Idaho had remained unchanged since designation in 1975; however, the current demographic status of these populations was uncertain. No rigorous data on population density and distribution or analysis of recent population genetic structure were available to measure the effectiveness of conservation efforts. We used genetic detection data from hair corral, bear rub, and opportunistic sampling in traditional and spatial capture—recapture models to generate estimates of abundance and density of grizzly bears in the CYE. We calculated mean bear residency on our sampling grid from telemetry data using Huggins and Pledger models to estimate the average number of bears present and to correct our superpopulation estimates for lack of geographic closure. Estimated grizzly bear abundance (all sex and age classes) in the CYE in 2012 was 48–50 bears, approximately half the population recovery goal. Grizzly bear density in the CYE (4.3–4.5 grizzly bears/1,000 km2) was among the lowest of interior North American populations. The sizes of the Cabinet (n = 22–24) and Yaak (n = 18–22) populations were similar. Spatial models produced similar estimates of abundance and density with comparable precision without requiring radio-telemetry data to address assumptions of geographic closure. The 2 populations in the CYE were demographically and reproductively isolated from each other and the Cabinet population was highly inbred. With parentage analysis, we documented natural migrants to the Cabinet and Yaak populations by bears born to parents in the Selkirk and Northern Continental Divide populations. These events supported data from other sources suggesting that the expansion of neighboring populations may eventually help sustain the CYE populations. However, the small size, isolation, and inbreeding documented by this study demonstrate the need for comprehensive management designed to support CYE population growth and increased connectivity and gene flow with other populations. Published 2015. This article is a U.S. Government work and is in the public domain in the USA.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-541X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1937-2817</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/jwmg.1019</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JWMAA9</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Bethesda: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Animal behavior ; Animal populations ; bear rub ; Bears ; Cabinet-Yaak Ecosystem ; Conservation status ; density estimation ; Ecosystems ; Estimates ; genetic detection ; Genetic structure ; grizzly bear ; Grizzly bears ; hair corral ; Huggins-Pledger capture-recapture models ; Inbreeding ; pedigree ; Population density ; Population Ecology ; Population growth ; spatially explicit capture-recapture models ; Telemetry ; Ursus arctos ; Wildlife management</subject><ispartof>The Journal of wildlife management, 2016-02, Vol.80 (2), p.314-331</ispartof><rights>Copyright© 2016 The Wildlife Society</rights><rights>The Wildlife Society, 2015</rights><rights>The Wildlife Society, 2016</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4609-ac8f828c15c4b935a1a4de2596af2f8c8e41e0af287bed4d97f5825d9242578a3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4609-ac8f828c15c4b935a1a4de2596af2f8c8e41e0af287bed4d97f5825d9242578a3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/24764960$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/24764960$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,799,1411,27901,27902,45550,45551,57992,58225</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kendall, Katherine C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Macleod, Amy C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Boyd, Kristina L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Boulanger, John</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Royle, J. Andrew</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kasworm, Wayne F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Paetkau, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Proctor, Michael F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Annis, Kim</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Graves, Tabitha A.</creatorcontrib><title>Density, distribution, and genetic structure of grizzly bears in the Cabinet-Yaak Ecosystem</title><title>The Journal of wildlife management</title><addtitle>Jour. Wild. Mgmt</addtitle><description>The conservation status of the 2 threatened grizzly bear (Ursus arctos) populations in the Cabinet-Yaak Ecosystem (CYE) of northern Montana and Idaho had remained unchanged since designation in 1975; however, the current demographic status of these populations was uncertain. No rigorous data on population density and distribution or analysis of recent population genetic structure were available to measure the effectiveness of conservation efforts. We used genetic detection data from hair corral, bear rub, and opportunistic sampling in traditional and spatial capture—recapture models to generate estimates of abundance and density of grizzly bears in the CYE. We calculated mean bear residency on our sampling grid from telemetry data using Huggins and Pledger models to estimate the average number of bears present and to correct our superpopulation estimates for lack of geographic closure. Estimated grizzly bear abundance (all sex and age classes) in the CYE in 2012 was 48–50 bears, approximately half the population recovery goal. Grizzly bear density in the CYE (4.3–4.5 grizzly bears/1,000 km2) was among the lowest of interior North American populations. The sizes of the Cabinet (n = 22–24) and Yaak (n = 18–22) populations were similar. Spatial models produced similar estimates of abundance and density with comparable precision without requiring radio-telemetry data to address assumptions of geographic closure. The 2 populations in the CYE were demographically and reproductively isolated from each other and the Cabinet population was highly inbred. With parentage analysis, we documented natural migrants to the Cabinet and Yaak populations by bears born to parents in the Selkirk and Northern Continental Divide populations. These events supported data from other sources suggesting that the expansion of neighboring populations may eventually help sustain the CYE populations. However, the small size, isolation, and inbreeding documented by this study demonstrate the need for comprehensive management designed to support CYE population growth and increased connectivity and gene flow with other populations. Published 2015. This article is a U.S. Government work and is in the public domain in the USA.</description><subject>Animal behavior</subject><subject>Animal populations</subject><subject>bear rub</subject><subject>Bears</subject><subject>Cabinet-Yaak Ecosystem</subject><subject>Conservation status</subject><subject>density estimation</subject><subject>Ecosystems</subject><subject>Estimates</subject><subject>genetic detection</subject><subject>Genetic structure</subject><subject>grizzly bear</subject><subject>Grizzly bears</subject><subject>hair corral</subject><subject>Huggins-Pledger capture-recapture models</subject><subject>Inbreeding</subject><subject>pedigree</subject><subject>Population density</subject><subject>Population Ecology</subject><subject>Population growth</subject><subject>spatially explicit capture-recapture models</subject><subject>Telemetry</subject><subject>Ursus arctos</subject><subject>Wildlife management</subject><issn>0022-541X</issn><issn>1937-2817</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kUFv1DAQhS0EEkvhwA9AssQFpIbajh3bR7S0C6sCaikqiIPlOJPF22zS2o5K-uvxKlUPSJxmNO97o9EbhF5S8o4Swo62t7tN7qh-hBZUl7JgisrHaJE1VghOfzxFz2LcElJSqqoF-vUB-ujTdIgbH1Pw9Zj80B9i2zd4Az0k73Cejy6NAfDQ4k3wd3fdhGuwIWLf4_Qb8NLWPrPFT2uv8LEb4hQT7J6jJ63tIry4rwfo-8nxxfJjcfp19Wn5_rRwvCK6sE61iilHheO1LoWlljfAhK5sy1rlFHAKJPdK1tDwRstWKCYazTgTUtnyAL2Z916H4WaEmMzORwddZ3sYxmioVEQwJVSZ0df_oNthDH2-LlMVUbzUSmXq7Uy5MMQYoDXXwe9smAwlZh-z2cds9jFn9mhmb30H0_9Bs778vLp3vJod25iG8OBgXFZcVyTrxaznh8CfB92GK1PJUgpz-WVl1hfy7NuaL815-RfaI5gZ</recordid><startdate>201602</startdate><enddate>201602</enddate><creator>Kendall, Katherine C.</creator><creator>Macleod, Amy C.</creator><creator>Boyd, Kristina L.</creator><creator>Boulanger, John</creator><creator>Royle, J. Andrew</creator><creator>Kasworm, Wayne F.</creator><creator>Paetkau, David</creator><creator>Proctor, Michael F.</creator><creator>Annis, Kim</creator><creator>Graves, Tabitha A.</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7U6</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>P64</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201602</creationdate><title>Density, distribution, and genetic structure of grizzly bears in the Cabinet-Yaak Ecosystem</title><author>Kendall, Katherine C. ; Macleod, Amy C. ; Boyd, Kristina L. ; Boulanger, John ; Royle, J. Andrew ; Kasworm, Wayne F. ; Paetkau, David ; Proctor, Michael F. ; Annis, Kim ; Graves, Tabitha A.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4609-ac8f828c15c4b935a1a4de2596af2f8c8e41e0af287bed4d97f5825d9242578a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Animal behavior</topic><topic>Animal populations</topic><topic>bear rub</topic><topic>Bears</topic><topic>Cabinet-Yaak Ecosystem</topic><topic>Conservation status</topic><topic>density estimation</topic><topic>Ecosystems</topic><topic>Estimates</topic><topic>genetic detection</topic><topic>Genetic structure</topic><topic>grizzly bear</topic><topic>Grizzly bears</topic><topic>hair corral</topic><topic>Huggins-Pledger capture-recapture models</topic><topic>Inbreeding</topic><topic>pedigree</topic><topic>Population density</topic><topic>Population Ecology</topic><topic>Population growth</topic><topic>spatially explicit capture-recapture models</topic><topic>Telemetry</topic><topic>Ursus arctos</topic><topic>Wildlife management</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kendall, Katherine C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Macleod, Amy C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Boyd, Kristina L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Boulanger, John</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Royle, J. Andrew</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kasworm, Wayne F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Paetkau, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Proctor, Michael F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Annis, Kim</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Graves, Tabitha A.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Sustainability Science Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><jtitle>The Journal of wildlife management</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kendall, Katherine C.</au><au>Macleod, Amy C.</au><au>Boyd, Kristina L.</au><au>Boulanger, John</au><au>Royle, J. Andrew</au><au>Kasworm, Wayne F.</au><au>Paetkau, David</au><au>Proctor, Michael F.</au><au>Annis, Kim</au><au>Graves, Tabitha A.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Density, distribution, and genetic structure of grizzly bears in the Cabinet-Yaak Ecosystem</atitle><jtitle>The Journal of wildlife management</jtitle><addtitle>Jour. Wild. Mgmt</addtitle><date>2016-02</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>80</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>314</spage><epage>331</epage><pages>314-331</pages><issn>0022-541X</issn><eissn>1937-2817</eissn><coden>JWMAA9</coden><abstract>The conservation status of the 2 threatened grizzly bear (Ursus arctos) populations in the Cabinet-Yaak Ecosystem (CYE) of northern Montana and Idaho had remained unchanged since designation in 1975; however, the current demographic status of these populations was uncertain. No rigorous data on population density and distribution or analysis of recent population genetic structure were available to measure the effectiveness of conservation efforts. We used genetic detection data from hair corral, bear rub, and opportunistic sampling in traditional and spatial capture—recapture models to generate estimates of abundance and density of grizzly bears in the CYE. We calculated mean bear residency on our sampling grid from telemetry data using Huggins and Pledger models to estimate the average number of bears present and to correct our superpopulation estimates for lack of geographic closure. Estimated grizzly bear abundance (all sex and age classes) in the CYE in 2012 was 48–50 bears, approximately half the population recovery goal. Grizzly bear density in the CYE (4.3–4.5 grizzly bears/1,000 km2) was among the lowest of interior North American populations. The sizes of the Cabinet (n = 22–24) and Yaak (n = 18–22) populations were similar. Spatial models produced similar estimates of abundance and density with comparable precision without requiring radio-telemetry data to address assumptions of geographic closure. The 2 populations in the CYE were demographically and reproductively isolated from each other and the Cabinet population was highly inbred. With parentage analysis, we documented natural migrants to the Cabinet and Yaak populations by bears born to parents in the Selkirk and Northern Continental Divide populations. These events supported data from other sources suggesting that the expansion of neighboring populations may eventually help sustain the CYE populations. However, the small size, isolation, and inbreeding documented by this study demonstrate the need for comprehensive management designed to support CYE population growth and increased connectivity and gene flow with other populations. Published 2015. This article is a U.S. Government work and is in the public domain in the USA.</abstract><cop>Bethesda</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><doi>10.1002/jwmg.1019</doi><tpages>18</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0022-541X
ispartof The Journal of wildlife management, 2016-02, Vol.80 (2), p.314-331
issn 0022-541X
1937-2817
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1780528583
source Jstor Complete Legacy; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete
subjects Animal behavior
Animal populations
bear rub
Bears
Cabinet-Yaak Ecosystem
Conservation status
density estimation
Ecosystems
Estimates
genetic detection
Genetic structure
grizzly bear
Grizzly bears
hair corral
Huggins-Pledger capture-recapture models
Inbreeding
pedigree
Population density
Population Ecology
Population growth
spatially explicit capture-recapture models
Telemetry
Ursus arctos
Wildlife management
title Density, distribution, and genetic structure of grizzly bears in the Cabinet-Yaak Ecosystem
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-02T11%3A18%3A21IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Density,%20distribution,%20and%20genetic%20structure%20of%20grizzly%20bears%20in%20the%20Cabinet-Yaak%20Ecosystem&rft.jtitle=The%20Journal%20of%20wildlife%20management&rft.au=Kendall,%20Katherine%20C.&rft.date=2016-02&rft.volume=80&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=314&rft.epage=331&rft.pages=314-331&rft.issn=0022-541X&rft.eissn=1937-2817&rft.coden=JWMAA9&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/jwmg.1019&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E24764960%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1760843988&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=24764960&rfr_iscdi=true