Monte Carlo Evaluation of Auger Electron-Emitting Theranostic Radionuclides
Several radionuclides used in medical imaging emit Auger electrons, which, depending on the targeting strategy, either may be exploited for therapeutic purposes or may contribute to an unintentional mean absorbed dose burden. In this study, the virtues of 12 Auger electron-emitting radionuclides wer...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of Nuclear Medicine 2015-09, Vol.56 (9), p.1441-1446 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1446 |
---|---|
container_issue | 9 |
container_start_page | 1441 |
container_title | Journal of Nuclear Medicine |
container_volume | 56 |
creator | Falzone, Nadia Fernández-Varea, José M Flux, Glenn Vallis, Katherine A |
description | Several radionuclides used in medical imaging emit Auger electrons, which, depending on the targeting strategy, either may be exploited for therapeutic purposes or may contribute to an unintentional mean absorbed dose burden. In this study, the virtues of 12 Auger electron-emitting radionuclides were evaluated in terms of cellular S values in concentric and eccentric cell-nucleus arrangements and by comparing their dose-point kernels.
The Monte Carlo code PENELOPE was used to transport the full particulate spectrum of (67)Ga, (80m)Br, (89)Zr, (90)Nb, (99m)Tc, (111)In, (117m)Sn, (119)Sb, (123)I, (125)I, (195m)Pt, and (201)Tl by means of event-by-event simulations. Cellular S values were calculated for varying cell and nucleus radii, and the effects of cell eccentricity on S values were evaluated. Dose-point kernels were determined up to 30 μm. Energy deposition at DNA scales was also compared with an α emitter, (223)Ra.
PENELOPE-determined S values were generally within 10% of MIRD values when the source and target regions strongly overlapped, that is, S(nucleus←nucleus) configurations, but greater differences were noted for S(nucleus←cytoplasm) and S(nucleus←cell surface) configurations. Cell eccentricity had the greatest effect when the nucleus was small, compared with the cell size, and when the radiation sources were on the cell surface. Dose-point kernels taken together with the energy spectra of the radionuclides can account for some of the differences in energy deposition patterns between the radionuclides. The energy deposition of most Auger electron emitters at DNA scales of 2 nm or less exceeded that of a monoenergetic 5.77-MeV α particle, but not for (223)Ra.
A single-cell dosimetric approach is required to evaluate the efficacy of individual radionuclides for theranostic purposes, taking cell geometry into account, with internalizing and noninternalizing targeting strategies. |
doi_str_mv | 10.2967/jnumed.114.153502 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1780525372</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1709394852</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c405t-c35b1ee4f33ce4690903e301789b4aeadf453c9986d7e6d495966dacad0d6a263</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkc9LwzAUx4Mobk7_AC9S8OKlM2matDmOUX_gRJB5LlnyOjvaZCat4H9vSreLJ0_vwft8v_D4IHRN8DwRPLvfmb4FPScknRNGGU5O0HRYYsZ5doqmmHASM4bZBF14v8MY8zzPz9Ek4Qlmicin6OXVmg6ipXSNjYpv2fSyq62JbBUt-i24qGhAdc6auGjrrqvNNlp_gpPG-q5W0bvUge5VU2vwl-isko2Hq8OcoY-HYr18ildvj8_LxSpWKWZdrCjbEIC0olRBygUWmALFJMvFJpUgdZUyqoTIuc6A61QwwbmWSmqsuUw4naG7sXfv7FcPvivb2itoGmnA9r4MTeE7RrPkHygWVKQ5G9DbP-jO9s6ERwJFCOY04XmgyEgpZ713UJV7V7fS_ZQEl4OUcpRSBinlKCVkbg7N_WY4HRNHC_QX-o2IGA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1711063268</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Monte Carlo Evaluation of Auger Electron-Emitting Theranostic Radionuclides</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>Falzone, Nadia ; Fernández-Varea, José M ; Flux, Glenn ; Vallis, Katherine A</creator><creatorcontrib>Falzone, Nadia ; Fernández-Varea, José M ; Flux, Glenn ; Vallis, Katherine A</creatorcontrib><description>Several radionuclides used in medical imaging emit Auger electrons, which, depending on the targeting strategy, either may be exploited for therapeutic purposes or may contribute to an unintentional mean absorbed dose burden. In this study, the virtues of 12 Auger electron-emitting radionuclides were evaluated in terms of cellular S values in concentric and eccentric cell-nucleus arrangements and by comparing their dose-point kernels.
The Monte Carlo code PENELOPE was used to transport the full particulate spectrum of (67)Ga, (80m)Br, (89)Zr, (90)Nb, (99m)Tc, (111)In, (117m)Sn, (119)Sb, (123)I, (125)I, (195m)Pt, and (201)Tl by means of event-by-event simulations. Cellular S values were calculated for varying cell and nucleus radii, and the effects of cell eccentricity on S values were evaluated. Dose-point kernels were determined up to 30 μm. Energy deposition at DNA scales was also compared with an α emitter, (223)Ra.
PENELOPE-determined S values were generally within 10% of MIRD values when the source and target regions strongly overlapped, that is, S(nucleus←nucleus) configurations, but greater differences were noted for S(nucleus←cytoplasm) and S(nucleus←cell surface) configurations. Cell eccentricity had the greatest effect when the nucleus was small, compared with the cell size, and when the radiation sources were on the cell surface. Dose-point kernels taken together with the energy spectra of the radionuclides can account for some of the differences in energy deposition patterns between the radionuclides. The energy deposition of most Auger electron emitters at DNA scales of 2 nm or less exceeded that of a monoenergetic 5.77-MeV α particle, but not for (223)Ra.
A single-cell dosimetric approach is required to evaluate the efficacy of individual radionuclides for theranostic purposes, taking cell geometry into account, with internalizing and noninternalizing targeting strategies.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0161-5505</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1535-5667</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2159-662X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.114.153502</identifier><identifier>PMID: 26205298</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JNMEAQ</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Society of Nuclear Medicine</publisher><subject>Animals ; Apoptosis - radiation effects ; Computer Simulation ; Cytoplasm ; Drug dosages ; Humans ; Linear Energy Transfer ; Medical imaging ; Models, Biological ; Models, Statistical ; Monte Carlo Method ; Monte Carlo simulation ; Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging ; Neoplasms - radiotherapy ; Nuclear medicine ; Radiation Dosage ; Radiation therapy ; Radioisotopes - therapeutic use ; Radiology ; Radionuclide Imaging ; Scattering, Radiation</subject><ispartof>Journal of Nuclear Medicine, 2015-09, Vol.56 (9), p.1441-1446</ispartof><rights>2015 by the Society of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright Society of Nuclear Medicine Sep 1, 2015</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c405t-c35b1ee4f33ce4690903e301789b4aeadf453c9986d7e6d495966dacad0d6a263</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c405t-c35b1ee4f33ce4690903e301789b4aeadf453c9986d7e6d495966dacad0d6a263</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27903,27904</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26205298$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Falzone, Nadia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fernández-Varea, José M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Flux, Glenn</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vallis, Katherine A</creatorcontrib><title>Monte Carlo Evaluation of Auger Electron-Emitting Theranostic Radionuclides</title><title>Journal of Nuclear Medicine</title><addtitle>J Nucl Med</addtitle><description>Several radionuclides used in medical imaging emit Auger electrons, which, depending on the targeting strategy, either may be exploited for therapeutic purposes or may contribute to an unintentional mean absorbed dose burden. In this study, the virtues of 12 Auger electron-emitting radionuclides were evaluated in terms of cellular S values in concentric and eccentric cell-nucleus arrangements and by comparing their dose-point kernels.
The Monte Carlo code PENELOPE was used to transport the full particulate spectrum of (67)Ga, (80m)Br, (89)Zr, (90)Nb, (99m)Tc, (111)In, (117m)Sn, (119)Sb, (123)I, (125)I, (195m)Pt, and (201)Tl by means of event-by-event simulations. Cellular S values were calculated for varying cell and nucleus radii, and the effects of cell eccentricity on S values were evaluated. Dose-point kernels were determined up to 30 μm. Energy deposition at DNA scales was also compared with an α emitter, (223)Ra.
PENELOPE-determined S values were generally within 10% of MIRD values when the source and target regions strongly overlapped, that is, S(nucleus←nucleus) configurations, but greater differences were noted for S(nucleus←cytoplasm) and S(nucleus←cell surface) configurations. Cell eccentricity had the greatest effect when the nucleus was small, compared with the cell size, and when the radiation sources were on the cell surface. Dose-point kernels taken together with the energy spectra of the radionuclides can account for some of the differences in energy deposition patterns between the radionuclides. The energy deposition of most Auger electron emitters at DNA scales of 2 nm or less exceeded that of a monoenergetic 5.77-MeV α particle, but not for (223)Ra.
A single-cell dosimetric approach is required to evaluate the efficacy of individual radionuclides for theranostic purposes, taking cell geometry into account, with internalizing and noninternalizing targeting strategies.</description><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Apoptosis - radiation effects</subject><subject>Computer Simulation</subject><subject>Cytoplasm</subject><subject>Drug dosages</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Linear Energy Transfer</subject><subject>Medical imaging</subject><subject>Models, Biological</subject><subject>Models, Statistical</subject><subject>Monte Carlo Method</subject><subject>Monte Carlo simulation</subject><subject>Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Neoplasms - radiotherapy</subject><subject>Nuclear medicine</subject><subject>Radiation Dosage</subject><subject>Radiation therapy</subject><subject>Radioisotopes - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Radiology</subject><subject>Radionuclide Imaging</subject><subject>Scattering, Radiation</subject><issn>0161-5505</issn><issn>1535-5667</issn><issn>2159-662X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkc9LwzAUx4Mobk7_AC9S8OKlM2matDmOUX_gRJB5LlnyOjvaZCat4H9vSreLJ0_vwft8v_D4IHRN8DwRPLvfmb4FPScknRNGGU5O0HRYYsZ5doqmmHASM4bZBF14v8MY8zzPz9Ek4Qlmicin6OXVmg6ipXSNjYpv2fSyq62JbBUt-i24qGhAdc6auGjrrqvNNlp_gpPG-q5W0bvUge5VU2vwl-isko2Hq8OcoY-HYr18ildvj8_LxSpWKWZdrCjbEIC0olRBygUWmALFJMvFJpUgdZUyqoTIuc6A61QwwbmWSmqsuUw4naG7sXfv7FcPvivb2itoGmnA9r4MTeE7RrPkHygWVKQ5G9DbP-jO9s6ERwJFCOY04XmgyEgpZ713UJV7V7fS_ZQEl4OUcpRSBinlKCVkbg7N_WY4HRNHC_QX-o2IGA</recordid><startdate>201509</startdate><enddate>201509</enddate><creator>Falzone, Nadia</creator><creator>Fernández-Varea, José M</creator><creator>Flux, Glenn</creator><creator>Vallis, Katherine A</creator><general>Society of Nuclear Medicine</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>4T-</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M7Z</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>7QO</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201509</creationdate><title>Monte Carlo Evaluation of Auger Electron-Emitting Theranostic Radionuclides</title><author>Falzone, Nadia ; Fernández-Varea, José M ; Flux, Glenn ; Vallis, Katherine A</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c405t-c35b1ee4f33ce4690903e301789b4aeadf453c9986d7e6d495966dacad0d6a263</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Apoptosis - radiation effects</topic><topic>Computer Simulation</topic><topic>Cytoplasm</topic><topic>Drug dosages</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Linear Energy Transfer</topic><topic>Medical imaging</topic><topic>Models, Biological</topic><topic>Models, Statistical</topic><topic>Monte Carlo Method</topic><topic>Monte Carlo simulation</topic><topic>Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Neoplasms - radiotherapy</topic><topic>Nuclear medicine</topic><topic>Radiation Dosage</topic><topic>Radiation therapy</topic><topic>Radioisotopes - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Radiology</topic><topic>Radionuclide Imaging</topic><topic>Scattering, Radiation</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Falzone, Nadia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fernández-Varea, José M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Flux, Glenn</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vallis, Katherine A</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Docstoc</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Biochemistry Abstracts 1</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Journal of Nuclear Medicine</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Falzone, Nadia</au><au>Fernández-Varea, José M</au><au>Flux, Glenn</au><au>Vallis, Katherine A</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Monte Carlo Evaluation of Auger Electron-Emitting Theranostic Radionuclides</atitle><jtitle>Journal of Nuclear Medicine</jtitle><addtitle>J Nucl Med</addtitle><date>2015-09</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>56</volume><issue>9</issue><spage>1441</spage><epage>1446</epage><pages>1441-1446</pages><issn>0161-5505</issn><eissn>1535-5667</eissn><eissn>2159-662X</eissn><coden>JNMEAQ</coden><abstract>Several radionuclides used in medical imaging emit Auger electrons, which, depending on the targeting strategy, either may be exploited for therapeutic purposes or may contribute to an unintentional mean absorbed dose burden. In this study, the virtues of 12 Auger electron-emitting radionuclides were evaluated in terms of cellular S values in concentric and eccentric cell-nucleus arrangements and by comparing their dose-point kernels.
The Monte Carlo code PENELOPE was used to transport the full particulate spectrum of (67)Ga, (80m)Br, (89)Zr, (90)Nb, (99m)Tc, (111)In, (117m)Sn, (119)Sb, (123)I, (125)I, (195m)Pt, and (201)Tl by means of event-by-event simulations. Cellular S values were calculated for varying cell and nucleus radii, and the effects of cell eccentricity on S values were evaluated. Dose-point kernels were determined up to 30 μm. Energy deposition at DNA scales was also compared with an α emitter, (223)Ra.
PENELOPE-determined S values were generally within 10% of MIRD values when the source and target regions strongly overlapped, that is, S(nucleus←nucleus) configurations, but greater differences were noted for S(nucleus←cytoplasm) and S(nucleus←cell surface) configurations. Cell eccentricity had the greatest effect when the nucleus was small, compared with the cell size, and when the radiation sources were on the cell surface. Dose-point kernels taken together with the energy spectra of the radionuclides can account for some of the differences in energy deposition patterns between the radionuclides. The energy deposition of most Auger electron emitters at DNA scales of 2 nm or less exceeded that of a monoenergetic 5.77-MeV α particle, but not for (223)Ra.
A single-cell dosimetric approach is required to evaluate the efficacy of individual radionuclides for theranostic purposes, taking cell geometry into account, with internalizing and noninternalizing targeting strategies.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Society of Nuclear Medicine</pub><pmid>26205298</pmid><doi>10.2967/jnumed.114.153502</doi><tpages>6</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0161-5505 |
ispartof | Journal of Nuclear Medicine, 2015-09, Vol.56 (9), p.1441-1446 |
issn | 0161-5505 1535-5667 2159-662X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1780525372 |
source | MEDLINE; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals |
subjects | Animals Apoptosis - radiation effects Computer Simulation Cytoplasm Drug dosages Humans Linear Energy Transfer Medical imaging Models, Biological Models, Statistical Monte Carlo Method Monte Carlo simulation Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging Neoplasms - radiotherapy Nuclear medicine Radiation Dosage Radiation therapy Radioisotopes - therapeutic use Radiology Radionuclide Imaging Scattering, Radiation |
title | Monte Carlo Evaluation of Auger Electron-Emitting Theranostic Radionuclides |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-22T00%3A40%3A43IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Monte%20Carlo%20Evaluation%20of%20Auger%20Electron-Emitting%20Theranostic%20Radionuclides&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20Nuclear%20Medicine&rft.au=Falzone,%20Nadia&rft.date=2015-09&rft.volume=56&rft.issue=9&rft.spage=1441&rft.epage=1446&rft.pages=1441-1446&rft.issn=0161-5505&rft.eissn=1535-5667&rft.coden=JNMEAQ&rft_id=info:doi/10.2967/jnumed.114.153502&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1709394852%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1711063268&rft_id=info:pmid/26205298&rfr_iscdi=true |