Monte Carlo Evaluation of Auger Electron-Emitting Theranostic Radionuclides

Several radionuclides used in medical imaging emit Auger electrons, which, depending on the targeting strategy, either may be exploited for therapeutic purposes or may contribute to an unintentional mean absorbed dose burden. In this study, the virtues of 12 Auger electron-emitting radionuclides wer...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of Nuclear Medicine 2015-09, Vol.56 (9), p.1441-1446
Hauptverfasser: Falzone, Nadia, Fernández-Varea, José M, Flux, Glenn, Vallis, Katherine A
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1446
container_issue 9
container_start_page 1441
container_title Journal of Nuclear Medicine
container_volume 56
creator Falzone, Nadia
Fernández-Varea, José M
Flux, Glenn
Vallis, Katherine A
description Several radionuclides used in medical imaging emit Auger electrons, which, depending on the targeting strategy, either may be exploited for therapeutic purposes or may contribute to an unintentional mean absorbed dose burden. In this study, the virtues of 12 Auger electron-emitting radionuclides were evaluated in terms of cellular S values in concentric and eccentric cell-nucleus arrangements and by comparing their dose-point kernels. The Monte Carlo code PENELOPE was used to transport the full particulate spectrum of (67)Ga, (80m)Br, (89)Zr, (90)Nb, (99m)Tc, (111)In, (117m)Sn, (119)Sb, (123)I, (125)I, (195m)Pt, and (201)Tl by means of event-by-event simulations. Cellular S values were calculated for varying cell and nucleus radii, and the effects of cell eccentricity on S values were evaluated. Dose-point kernels were determined up to 30 μm. Energy deposition at DNA scales was also compared with an α emitter, (223)Ra. PENELOPE-determined S values were generally within 10% of MIRD values when the source and target regions strongly overlapped, that is, S(nucleus←nucleus) configurations, but greater differences were noted for S(nucleus←cytoplasm) and S(nucleus←cell surface) configurations. Cell eccentricity had the greatest effect when the nucleus was small, compared with the cell size, and when the radiation sources were on the cell surface. Dose-point kernels taken together with the energy spectra of the radionuclides can account for some of the differences in energy deposition patterns between the radionuclides. The energy deposition of most Auger electron emitters at DNA scales of 2 nm or less exceeded that of a monoenergetic 5.77-MeV α particle, but not for (223)Ra. A single-cell dosimetric approach is required to evaluate the efficacy of individual radionuclides for theranostic purposes, taking cell geometry into account, with internalizing and noninternalizing targeting strategies.
doi_str_mv 10.2967/jnumed.114.153502
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1780525372</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1709394852</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c405t-c35b1ee4f33ce4690903e301789b4aeadf453c9986d7e6d495966dacad0d6a263</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkc9LwzAUx4Mobk7_AC9S8OKlM2matDmOUX_gRJB5LlnyOjvaZCat4H9vSreLJ0_vwft8v_D4IHRN8DwRPLvfmb4FPScknRNGGU5O0HRYYsZ5doqmmHASM4bZBF14v8MY8zzPz9Ek4Qlmicin6OXVmg6ipXSNjYpv2fSyq62JbBUt-i24qGhAdc6auGjrrqvNNlp_gpPG-q5W0bvUge5VU2vwl-isko2Hq8OcoY-HYr18ildvj8_LxSpWKWZdrCjbEIC0olRBygUWmALFJMvFJpUgdZUyqoTIuc6A61QwwbmWSmqsuUw4naG7sXfv7FcPvivb2itoGmnA9r4MTeE7RrPkHygWVKQ5G9DbP-jO9s6ERwJFCOY04XmgyEgpZ713UJV7V7fS_ZQEl4OUcpRSBinlKCVkbg7N_WY4HRNHC_QX-o2IGA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1711063268</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Monte Carlo Evaluation of Auger Electron-Emitting Theranostic Radionuclides</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>Falzone, Nadia ; Fernández-Varea, José M ; Flux, Glenn ; Vallis, Katherine A</creator><creatorcontrib>Falzone, Nadia ; Fernández-Varea, José M ; Flux, Glenn ; Vallis, Katherine A</creatorcontrib><description>Several radionuclides used in medical imaging emit Auger electrons, which, depending on the targeting strategy, either may be exploited for therapeutic purposes or may contribute to an unintentional mean absorbed dose burden. In this study, the virtues of 12 Auger electron-emitting radionuclides were evaluated in terms of cellular S values in concentric and eccentric cell-nucleus arrangements and by comparing their dose-point kernels. The Monte Carlo code PENELOPE was used to transport the full particulate spectrum of (67)Ga, (80m)Br, (89)Zr, (90)Nb, (99m)Tc, (111)In, (117m)Sn, (119)Sb, (123)I, (125)I, (195m)Pt, and (201)Tl by means of event-by-event simulations. Cellular S values were calculated for varying cell and nucleus radii, and the effects of cell eccentricity on S values were evaluated. Dose-point kernels were determined up to 30 μm. Energy deposition at DNA scales was also compared with an α emitter, (223)Ra. PENELOPE-determined S values were generally within 10% of MIRD values when the source and target regions strongly overlapped, that is, S(nucleus←nucleus) configurations, but greater differences were noted for S(nucleus←cytoplasm) and S(nucleus←cell surface) configurations. Cell eccentricity had the greatest effect when the nucleus was small, compared with the cell size, and when the radiation sources were on the cell surface. Dose-point kernels taken together with the energy spectra of the radionuclides can account for some of the differences in energy deposition patterns between the radionuclides. The energy deposition of most Auger electron emitters at DNA scales of 2 nm or less exceeded that of a monoenergetic 5.77-MeV α particle, but not for (223)Ra. A single-cell dosimetric approach is required to evaluate the efficacy of individual radionuclides for theranostic purposes, taking cell geometry into account, with internalizing and noninternalizing targeting strategies.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0161-5505</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1535-5667</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2159-662X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.114.153502</identifier><identifier>PMID: 26205298</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JNMEAQ</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Society of Nuclear Medicine</publisher><subject>Animals ; Apoptosis - radiation effects ; Computer Simulation ; Cytoplasm ; Drug dosages ; Humans ; Linear Energy Transfer ; Medical imaging ; Models, Biological ; Models, Statistical ; Monte Carlo Method ; Monte Carlo simulation ; Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging ; Neoplasms - radiotherapy ; Nuclear medicine ; Radiation Dosage ; Radiation therapy ; Radioisotopes - therapeutic use ; Radiology ; Radionuclide Imaging ; Scattering, Radiation</subject><ispartof>Journal of Nuclear Medicine, 2015-09, Vol.56 (9), p.1441-1446</ispartof><rights>2015 by the Society of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright Society of Nuclear Medicine Sep 1, 2015</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c405t-c35b1ee4f33ce4690903e301789b4aeadf453c9986d7e6d495966dacad0d6a263</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c405t-c35b1ee4f33ce4690903e301789b4aeadf453c9986d7e6d495966dacad0d6a263</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27903,27904</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26205298$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Falzone, Nadia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fernández-Varea, José M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Flux, Glenn</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vallis, Katherine A</creatorcontrib><title>Monte Carlo Evaluation of Auger Electron-Emitting Theranostic Radionuclides</title><title>Journal of Nuclear Medicine</title><addtitle>J Nucl Med</addtitle><description>Several radionuclides used in medical imaging emit Auger electrons, which, depending on the targeting strategy, either may be exploited for therapeutic purposes or may contribute to an unintentional mean absorbed dose burden. In this study, the virtues of 12 Auger electron-emitting radionuclides were evaluated in terms of cellular S values in concentric and eccentric cell-nucleus arrangements and by comparing their dose-point kernels. The Monte Carlo code PENELOPE was used to transport the full particulate spectrum of (67)Ga, (80m)Br, (89)Zr, (90)Nb, (99m)Tc, (111)In, (117m)Sn, (119)Sb, (123)I, (125)I, (195m)Pt, and (201)Tl by means of event-by-event simulations. Cellular S values were calculated for varying cell and nucleus radii, and the effects of cell eccentricity on S values were evaluated. Dose-point kernels were determined up to 30 μm. Energy deposition at DNA scales was also compared with an α emitter, (223)Ra. PENELOPE-determined S values were generally within 10% of MIRD values when the source and target regions strongly overlapped, that is, S(nucleus←nucleus) configurations, but greater differences were noted for S(nucleus←cytoplasm) and S(nucleus←cell surface) configurations. Cell eccentricity had the greatest effect when the nucleus was small, compared with the cell size, and when the radiation sources were on the cell surface. Dose-point kernels taken together with the energy spectra of the radionuclides can account for some of the differences in energy deposition patterns between the radionuclides. The energy deposition of most Auger electron emitters at DNA scales of 2 nm or less exceeded that of a monoenergetic 5.77-MeV α particle, but not for (223)Ra. A single-cell dosimetric approach is required to evaluate the efficacy of individual radionuclides for theranostic purposes, taking cell geometry into account, with internalizing and noninternalizing targeting strategies.</description><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Apoptosis - radiation effects</subject><subject>Computer Simulation</subject><subject>Cytoplasm</subject><subject>Drug dosages</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Linear Energy Transfer</subject><subject>Medical imaging</subject><subject>Models, Biological</subject><subject>Models, Statistical</subject><subject>Monte Carlo Method</subject><subject>Monte Carlo simulation</subject><subject>Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Neoplasms - radiotherapy</subject><subject>Nuclear medicine</subject><subject>Radiation Dosage</subject><subject>Radiation therapy</subject><subject>Radioisotopes - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Radiology</subject><subject>Radionuclide Imaging</subject><subject>Scattering, Radiation</subject><issn>0161-5505</issn><issn>1535-5667</issn><issn>2159-662X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkc9LwzAUx4Mobk7_AC9S8OKlM2matDmOUX_gRJB5LlnyOjvaZCat4H9vSreLJ0_vwft8v_D4IHRN8DwRPLvfmb4FPScknRNGGU5O0HRYYsZ5doqmmHASM4bZBF14v8MY8zzPz9Ek4Qlmicin6OXVmg6ipXSNjYpv2fSyq62JbBUt-i24qGhAdc6auGjrrqvNNlp_gpPG-q5W0bvUge5VU2vwl-isko2Hq8OcoY-HYr18ildvj8_LxSpWKWZdrCjbEIC0olRBygUWmALFJMvFJpUgdZUyqoTIuc6A61QwwbmWSmqsuUw4naG7sXfv7FcPvivb2itoGmnA9r4MTeE7RrPkHygWVKQ5G9DbP-jO9s6ERwJFCOY04XmgyEgpZ713UJV7V7fS_ZQEl4OUcpRSBinlKCVkbg7N_WY4HRNHC_QX-o2IGA</recordid><startdate>201509</startdate><enddate>201509</enddate><creator>Falzone, Nadia</creator><creator>Fernández-Varea, José M</creator><creator>Flux, Glenn</creator><creator>Vallis, Katherine A</creator><general>Society of Nuclear Medicine</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>4T-</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M7Z</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>7QO</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201509</creationdate><title>Monte Carlo Evaluation of Auger Electron-Emitting Theranostic Radionuclides</title><author>Falzone, Nadia ; Fernández-Varea, José M ; Flux, Glenn ; Vallis, Katherine A</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c405t-c35b1ee4f33ce4690903e301789b4aeadf453c9986d7e6d495966dacad0d6a263</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Apoptosis - radiation effects</topic><topic>Computer Simulation</topic><topic>Cytoplasm</topic><topic>Drug dosages</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Linear Energy Transfer</topic><topic>Medical imaging</topic><topic>Models, Biological</topic><topic>Models, Statistical</topic><topic>Monte Carlo Method</topic><topic>Monte Carlo simulation</topic><topic>Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Neoplasms - radiotherapy</topic><topic>Nuclear medicine</topic><topic>Radiation Dosage</topic><topic>Radiation therapy</topic><topic>Radioisotopes - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Radiology</topic><topic>Radionuclide Imaging</topic><topic>Scattering, Radiation</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Falzone, Nadia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fernández-Varea, José M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Flux, Glenn</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vallis, Katherine A</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Docstoc</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Biochemistry Abstracts 1</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Journal of Nuclear Medicine</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Falzone, Nadia</au><au>Fernández-Varea, José M</au><au>Flux, Glenn</au><au>Vallis, Katherine A</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Monte Carlo Evaluation of Auger Electron-Emitting Theranostic Radionuclides</atitle><jtitle>Journal of Nuclear Medicine</jtitle><addtitle>J Nucl Med</addtitle><date>2015-09</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>56</volume><issue>9</issue><spage>1441</spage><epage>1446</epage><pages>1441-1446</pages><issn>0161-5505</issn><eissn>1535-5667</eissn><eissn>2159-662X</eissn><coden>JNMEAQ</coden><abstract>Several radionuclides used in medical imaging emit Auger electrons, which, depending on the targeting strategy, either may be exploited for therapeutic purposes or may contribute to an unintentional mean absorbed dose burden. In this study, the virtues of 12 Auger electron-emitting radionuclides were evaluated in terms of cellular S values in concentric and eccentric cell-nucleus arrangements and by comparing their dose-point kernels. The Monte Carlo code PENELOPE was used to transport the full particulate spectrum of (67)Ga, (80m)Br, (89)Zr, (90)Nb, (99m)Tc, (111)In, (117m)Sn, (119)Sb, (123)I, (125)I, (195m)Pt, and (201)Tl by means of event-by-event simulations. Cellular S values were calculated for varying cell and nucleus radii, and the effects of cell eccentricity on S values were evaluated. Dose-point kernels were determined up to 30 μm. Energy deposition at DNA scales was also compared with an α emitter, (223)Ra. PENELOPE-determined S values were generally within 10% of MIRD values when the source and target regions strongly overlapped, that is, S(nucleus←nucleus) configurations, but greater differences were noted for S(nucleus←cytoplasm) and S(nucleus←cell surface) configurations. Cell eccentricity had the greatest effect when the nucleus was small, compared with the cell size, and when the radiation sources were on the cell surface. Dose-point kernels taken together with the energy spectra of the radionuclides can account for some of the differences in energy deposition patterns between the radionuclides. The energy deposition of most Auger electron emitters at DNA scales of 2 nm or less exceeded that of a monoenergetic 5.77-MeV α particle, but not for (223)Ra. A single-cell dosimetric approach is required to evaluate the efficacy of individual radionuclides for theranostic purposes, taking cell geometry into account, with internalizing and noninternalizing targeting strategies.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Society of Nuclear Medicine</pub><pmid>26205298</pmid><doi>10.2967/jnumed.114.153502</doi><tpages>6</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0161-5505
ispartof Journal of Nuclear Medicine, 2015-09, Vol.56 (9), p.1441-1446
issn 0161-5505
1535-5667
2159-662X
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1780525372
source MEDLINE; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals
subjects Animals
Apoptosis - radiation effects
Computer Simulation
Cytoplasm
Drug dosages
Humans
Linear Energy Transfer
Medical imaging
Models, Biological
Models, Statistical
Monte Carlo Method
Monte Carlo simulation
Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging
Neoplasms - radiotherapy
Nuclear medicine
Radiation Dosage
Radiation therapy
Radioisotopes - therapeutic use
Radiology
Radionuclide Imaging
Scattering, Radiation
title Monte Carlo Evaluation of Auger Electron-Emitting Theranostic Radionuclides
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-22T00%3A40%3A43IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Monte%20Carlo%20Evaluation%20of%20Auger%20Electron-Emitting%20Theranostic%20Radionuclides&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20Nuclear%20Medicine&rft.au=Falzone,%20Nadia&rft.date=2015-09&rft.volume=56&rft.issue=9&rft.spage=1441&rft.epage=1446&rft.pages=1441-1446&rft.issn=0161-5505&rft.eissn=1535-5667&rft.coden=JNMEAQ&rft_id=info:doi/10.2967/jnumed.114.153502&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1709394852%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1711063268&rft_id=info:pmid/26205298&rfr_iscdi=true