Electrical penetration graph technique as a tool to monitor the early stages of aphid resistance to insecticides
BACKGROUND: Sulfoxaflor, a new insecticide from the sulfoximine chemical family, and imidacloprid, a widely used neonicotinoid insecticide, were tested to assess the susceptibility and feeding behaviour of two populations of Myzus persicae: Mp61, which exhibited target‐site R81T resistance to neonic...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Pest management science 2016-04, Vol.72 (4), p.707-718 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 718 |
---|---|
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 707 |
container_title | Pest management science |
container_volume | 72 |
creator | Garzo, Elisa Moreno, Aranzazu Hernando, Sara Mariño, Vera Torne, María Santamaria, Estrella Díaz, Isabel Fereres, Alberto |
description | BACKGROUND: Sulfoxaflor, a new insecticide from the sulfoximine chemical family, and imidacloprid, a widely used neonicotinoid insecticide, were tested to assess the susceptibility and feeding behaviour of two populations of Myzus persicae: Mp61, which exhibited target‐site R81T resistance to neonicotinoids, and Mp1989, a laboratory clone maintained since 1989 as a susceptible reference. RESULTS: The imidacloprid LC₅₀ value for Mp61 was 16 times higher than for Mp1989, showing a moderate level of resistance. Sulfoxaflor LC₅₀ values for Mp61 and Mp1989 were much closer. The probing behaviour, as assessed by electrical penetration graphs (EPGs), of both populations was clearly altered by sulfoxaflor, which reduced the ability of aphids to find and feed from the phloem. The feeding behaviour of the susceptible Mp1989 population was much more severely affected than the moderately resistant Mp61 population on imidacloprid‐treated plants. PCR assays of both aphid populations followed by DNA sequencing identified differences between populations in the point mutation in the β‐subunit of the nicotinic acetylcholine receptor linked to the resistant gene against the neonicotinoid insecticide. CONCLUSIONS: Sulfoxaflor provoked feeding cessation more rapidly than imidacloprid in both aphid populations. Sharp differences in feeding behaviour were detected between the susceptible and the moderately resistant neonicotinoid‐resistant aphid populations. The EPG technique can be used as a useful tool to give new insights into the functional effects of new chemical compounds and for early detection of low to moderate levels of resistance of sap‐feeding insects to insecticides. The potential of this technique was validated by molecular analysis of the R81T mutation target site. © 2015 Society of Chemical Industry |
doi_str_mv | 10.1002/ps.4041 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1780513515</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1780513515</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4731-c1359c8cdfc8a600ef94430f5c346567e00b962e24da9c600e8d1965d8ef76733</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp10VFvFCEQAGBiNLZW4z9QEh80MVthF1h4NE1bTZtqPBt9I5SdvaPuLSvDRe_fy2XPezDxBQj5mGFmCHnO2SlnrH434alggj8gx1zWqhLG6IeHs_5-RJ4g3jPGjDH1Y3JUS6MNE80xmc4H8DkF7wY6wQg5uRziSJfJTSuawa_G8HMD1CF1NMc4lIWu4xhyTDSvgIJLw5ZidktAGntanoWOJsBQ7kYPOx9GLEmCDx3gU_KodwPCs_1-Qm4vzr-efaiuP11-PHt_XXnRNrzyvJHGa9_1XjvFGPRGiIb10jdCSdUCY3dG1VCLzhm_A7rjRslOQ9-qtmlOyJs57pRiKQCzXQf0MAxuhLhBy1vNZEnCZaGv_qH3cZPG8ruilNZKcaGKej0rnyJigt5OKaxd2lrO7G4IdkK7G0KRL_bxNndr6A7ub9cLeDuDX2GA7f_i2M-Lfbhq1qWj8PugXfphS6GttN9uLu3V4uYLb-WVvSj-5ex7F61bpoD2dlEzXprEVasNb_4AbWWnuA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1768866146</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Electrical penetration graph technique as a tool to monitor the early stages of aphid resistance to insecticides</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Garzo, Elisa ; Moreno, Aranzazu ; Hernando, Sara ; Mariño, Vera ; Torne, María ; Santamaria, Estrella ; Díaz, Isabel ; Fereres, Alberto</creator><creatorcontrib>Garzo, Elisa ; Moreno, Aranzazu ; Hernando, Sara ; Mariño, Vera ; Torne, María ; Santamaria, Estrella ; Díaz, Isabel ; Fereres, Alberto</creatorcontrib><description>BACKGROUND: Sulfoxaflor, a new insecticide from the sulfoximine chemical family, and imidacloprid, a widely used neonicotinoid insecticide, were tested to assess the susceptibility and feeding behaviour of two populations of Myzus persicae: Mp61, which exhibited target‐site R81T resistance to neonicotinoids, and Mp1989, a laboratory clone maintained since 1989 as a susceptible reference. RESULTS: The imidacloprid LC₅₀ value for Mp61 was 16 times higher than for Mp1989, showing a moderate level of resistance. Sulfoxaflor LC₅₀ values for Mp61 and Mp1989 were much closer. The probing behaviour, as assessed by electrical penetration graphs (EPGs), of both populations was clearly altered by sulfoxaflor, which reduced the ability of aphids to find and feed from the phloem. The feeding behaviour of the susceptible Mp1989 population was much more severely affected than the moderately resistant Mp61 population on imidacloprid‐treated plants. PCR assays of both aphid populations followed by DNA sequencing identified differences between populations in the point mutation in the β‐subunit of the nicotinic acetylcholine receptor linked to the resistant gene against the neonicotinoid insecticide. CONCLUSIONS: Sulfoxaflor provoked feeding cessation more rapidly than imidacloprid in both aphid populations. Sharp differences in feeding behaviour were detected between the susceptible and the moderately resistant neonicotinoid‐resistant aphid populations. The EPG technique can be used as a useful tool to give new insights into the functional effects of new chemical compounds and for early detection of low to moderate levels of resistance of sap‐feeding insects to insecticides. The potential of this technique was validated by molecular analysis of the R81T mutation target site. © 2015 Society of Chemical Industry</description><identifier>ISSN: 1526-498X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1526-4998</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/ps.4041</identifier><identifier>PMID: 25989043</identifier><identifier>CODEN: PMSCFC</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd</publisher><subject>Animals ; Aphididae ; Aphids - drug effects ; Aphids - genetics ; Aphids - physiology ; Biological Assay - methods ; DNA Mutational Analysis ; Electricity ; EPGs ; Feeding behavior ; Feeding Behavior - drug effects ; green peach aphid ; Imidazoles - pharmacology ; Insecticide Resistance - genetics ; Insecticides ; Insecticides - pharmacology ; Mutation ; Myzus persicae ; Neonicotinoids ; Nitro Compounds - pharmacology ; Pest control ; Plant resistance ; Pyridines - pharmacology ; resistance ; sulfoximine ; Sulfur Compounds - pharmacology</subject><ispartof>Pest management science, 2016-04, Vol.72 (4), p.707-718</ispartof><rights>2015 Society of Chemical Industry</rights><rights>2015 Society of Chemical Industry.</rights><rights>2016 Society of Chemical Industry</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4731-c1359c8cdfc8a600ef94430f5c346567e00b962e24da9c600e8d1965d8ef76733</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4731-c1359c8cdfc8a600ef94430f5c346567e00b962e24da9c600e8d1965d8ef76733</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fps.4041$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fps.4041$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,27924,27925,45574,45575</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25989043$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Garzo, Elisa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moreno, Aranzazu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hernando, Sara</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mariño, Vera</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Torne, María</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Santamaria, Estrella</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Díaz, Isabel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fereres, Alberto</creatorcontrib><title>Electrical penetration graph technique as a tool to monitor the early stages of aphid resistance to insecticides</title><title>Pest management science</title><addtitle>Pest. Manag. Sci</addtitle><description>BACKGROUND: Sulfoxaflor, a new insecticide from the sulfoximine chemical family, and imidacloprid, a widely used neonicotinoid insecticide, were tested to assess the susceptibility and feeding behaviour of two populations of Myzus persicae: Mp61, which exhibited target‐site R81T resistance to neonicotinoids, and Mp1989, a laboratory clone maintained since 1989 as a susceptible reference. RESULTS: The imidacloprid LC₅₀ value for Mp61 was 16 times higher than for Mp1989, showing a moderate level of resistance. Sulfoxaflor LC₅₀ values for Mp61 and Mp1989 were much closer. The probing behaviour, as assessed by electrical penetration graphs (EPGs), of both populations was clearly altered by sulfoxaflor, which reduced the ability of aphids to find and feed from the phloem. The feeding behaviour of the susceptible Mp1989 population was much more severely affected than the moderately resistant Mp61 population on imidacloprid‐treated plants. PCR assays of both aphid populations followed by DNA sequencing identified differences between populations in the point mutation in the β‐subunit of the nicotinic acetylcholine receptor linked to the resistant gene against the neonicotinoid insecticide. CONCLUSIONS: Sulfoxaflor provoked feeding cessation more rapidly than imidacloprid in both aphid populations. Sharp differences in feeding behaviour were detected between the susceptible and the moderately resistant neonicotinoid‐resistant aphid populations. The EPG technique can be used as a useful tool to give new insights into the functional effects of new chemical compounds and for early detection of low to moderate levels of resistance of sap‐feeding insects to insecticides. The potential of this technique was validated by molecular analysis of the R81T mutation target site. © 2015 Society of Chemical Industry</description><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Aphididae</subject><subject>Aphids - drug effects</subject><subject>Aphids - genetics</subject><subject>Aphids - physiology</subject><subject>Biological Assay - methods</subject><subject>DNA Mutational Analysis</subject><subject>Electricity</subject><subject>EPGs</subject><subject>Feeding behavior</subject><subject>Feeding Behavior - drug effects</subject><subject>green peach aphid</subject><subject>Imidazoles - pharmacology</subject><subject>Insecticide Resistance - genetics</subject><subject>Insecticides</subject><subject>Insecticides - pharmacology</subject><subject>Mutation</subject><subject>Myzus persicae</subject><subject>Neonicotinoids</subject><subject>Nitro Compounds - pharmacology</subject><subject>Pest control</subject><subject>Plant resistance</subject><subject>Pyridines - pharmacology</subject><subject>resistance</subject><subject>sulfoximine</subject><subject>Sulfur Compounds - pharmacology</subject><issn>1526-498X</issn><issn>1526-4998</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp10VFvFCEQAGBiNLZW4z9QEh80MVthF1h4NE1bTZtqPBt9I5SdvaPuLSvDRe_fy2XPezDxBQj5mGFmCHnO2SlnrH434alggj8gx1zWqhLG6IeHs_5-RJ4g3jPGjDH1Y3JUS6MNE80xmc4H8DkF7wY6wQg5uRziSJfJTSuawa_G8HMD1CF1NMc4lIWu4xhyTDSvgIJLw5ZidktAGntanoWOJsBQ7kYPOx9GLEmCDx3gU_KodwPCs_1-Qm4vzr-efaiuP11-PHt_XXnRNrzyvJHGa9_1XjvFGPRGiIb10jdCSdUCY3dG1VCLzhm_A7rjRslOQ9-qtmlOyJs57pRiKQCzXQf0MAxuhLhBy1vNZEnCZaGv_qH3cZPG8ruilNZKcaGKej0rnyJigt5OKaxd2lrO7G4IdkK7G0KRL_bxNndr6A7ub9cLeDuDX2GA7f_i2M-Lfbhq1qWj8PugXfphS6GttN9uLu3V4uYLb-WVvSj-5ex7F61bpoD2dlEzXprEVasNb_4AbWWnuA</recordid><startdate>201604</startdate><enddate>201604</enddate><creator>Garzo, Elisa</creator><creator>Moreno, Aranzazu</creator><creator>Hernando, Sara</creator><creator>Mariño, Vera</creator><creator>Torne, María</creator><creator>Santamaria, Estrella</creator><creator>Díaz, Isabel</creator><creator>Fereres, Alberto</creator><general>John Wiley & Sons, Ltd</general><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QR</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>SOI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201604</creationdate><title>Electrical penetration graph technique as a tool to monitor the early stages of aphid resistance to insecticides</title><author>Garzo, Elisa ; Moreno, Aranzazu ; Hernando, Sara ; Mariño, Vera ; Torne, María ; Santamaria, Estrella ; Díaz, Isabel ; Fereres, Alberto</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4731-c1359c8cdfc8a600ef94430f5c346567e00b962e24da9c600e8d1965d8ef76733</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Aphididae</topic><topic>Aphids - drug effects</topic><topic>Aphids - genetics</topic><topic>Aphids - physiology</topic><topic>Biological Assay - methods</topic><topic>DNA Mutational Analysis</topic><topic>Electricity</topic><topic>EPGs</topic><topic>Feeding behavior</topic><topic>Feeding Behavior - drug effects</topic><topic>green peach aphid</topic><topic>Imidazoles - pharmacology</topic><topic>Insecticide Resistance - genetics</topic><topic>Insecticides</topic><topic>Insecticides - pharmacology</topic><topic>Mutation</topic><topic>Myzus persicae</topic><topic>Neonicotinoids</topic><topic>Nitro Compounds - pharmacology</topic><topic>Pest control</topic><topic>Plant resistance</topic><topic>Pyridines - pharmacology</topic><topic>resistance</topic><topic>sulfoximine</topic><topic>Sulfur Compounds - pharmacology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Garzo, Elisa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moreno, Aranzazu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hernando, Sara</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mariño, Vera</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Torne, María</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Santamaria, Estrella</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Díaz, Isabel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fereres, Alberto</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Chemoreception Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Pest management science</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Garzo, Elisa</au><au>Moreno, Aranzazu</au><au>Hernando, Sara</au><au>Mariño, Vera</au><au>Torne, María</au><au>Santamaria, Estrella</au><au>Díaz, Isabel</au><au>Fereres, Alberto</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Electrical penetration graph technique as a tool to monitor the early stages of aphid resistance to insecticides</atitle><jtitle>Pest management science</jtitle><addtitle>Pest. Manag. Sci</addtitle><date>2016-04</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>72</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>707</spage><epage>718</epage><pages>707-718</pages><issn>1526-498X</issn><eissn>1526-4998</eissn><coden>PMSCFC</coden><abstract>BACKGROUND: Sulfoxaflor, a new insecticide from the sulfoximine chemical family, and imidacloprid, a widely used neonicotinoid insecticide, were tested to assess the susceptibility and feeding behaviour of two populations of Myzus persicae: Mp61, which exhibited target‐site R81T resistance to neonicotinoids, and Mp1989, a laboratory clone maintained since 1989 as a susceptible reference. RESULTS: The imidacloprid LC₅₀ value for Mp61 was 16 times higher than for Mp1989, showing a moderate level of resistance. Sulfoxaflor LC₅₀ values for Mp61 and Mp1989 were much closer. The probing behaviour, as assessed by electrical penetration graphs (EPGs), of both populations was clearly altered by sulfoxaflor, which reduced the ability of aphids to find and feed from the phloem. The feeding behaviour of the susceptible Mp1989 population was much more severely affected than the moderately resistant Mp61 population on imidacloprid‐treated plants. PCR assays of both aphid populations followed by DNA sequencing identified differences between populations in the point mutation in the β‐subunit of the nicotinic acetylcholine receptor linked to the resistant gene against the neonicotinoid insecticide. CONCLUSIONS: Sulfoxaflor provoked feeding cessation more rapidly than imidacloprid in both aphid populations. Sharp differences in feeding behaviour were detected between the susceptible and the moderately resistant neonicotinoid‐resistant aphid populations. The EPG technique can be used as a useful tool to give new insights into the functional effects of new chemical compounds and for early detection of low to moderate levels of resistance of sap‐feeding insects to insecticides. The potential of this technique was validated by molecular analysis of the R81T mutation target site. © 2015 Society of Chemical Industry</abstract><cop>Chichester, UK</cop><pub>John Wiley & Sons, Ltd</pub><pmid>25989043</pmid><doi>10.1002/ps.4041</doi><tpages>12</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1526-498X |
ispartof | Pest management science, 2016-04, Vol.72 (4), p.707-718 |
issn | 1526-498X 1526-4998 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1780513515 |
source | MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete |
subjects | Animals Aphididae Aphids - drug effects Aphids - genetics Aphids - physiology Biological Assay - methods DNA Mutational Analysis Electricity EPGs Feeding behavior Feeding Behavior - drug effects green peach aphid Imidazoles - pharmacology Insecticide Resistance - genetics Insecticides Insecticides - pharmacology Mutation Myzus persicae Neonicotinoids Nitro Compounds - pharmacology Pest control Plant resistance Pyridines - pharmacology resistance sulfoximine Sulfur Compounds - pharmacology |
title | Electrical penetration graph technique as a tool to monitor the early stages of aphid resistance to insecticides |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-06T07%3A06%3A36IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Electrical%20penetration%20graph%20technique%20as%20a%20tool%20to%20monitor%20the%20early%20stages%20of%20aphid%20resistance%20to%20insecticides&rft.jtitle=Pest%20management%20science&rft.au=Garzo,%20Elisa&rft.date=2016-04&rft.volume=72&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=707&rft.epage=718&rft.pages=707-718&rft.issn=1526-498X&rft.eissn=1526-4998&rft.coden=PMSCFC&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/ps.4041&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1780513515%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1768866146&rft_id=info:pmid/25989043&rfr_iscdi=true |