What Distinguishes Suicide Attempters From Suicide Ideators? A Meta-Analysis of Potential Factors

Most suicide ideators do not attempt suicide. Thus, it is useful to understand what differentiates attempters from ideators. We meta‐analyzed 27 studies comparing sociodemographic and clinical variables between attempters and ideators. When comparing ideators to nonsuicidal individuals, there were s...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:

Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:	Clinical psychology (New York, N.Y.) N.Y.), 2016-03, Vol.23 (1), p.5-20
Hauptverfasser:	May, Alexis M., Klonsky, E. David
Format:	Artikel
Sprache:	eng
Schlagworte:	attempt Attempted Suicide Human ideation meta-analysis risk assessment Risk Factors Suicidal Ideation suicide Systematic review
Online-Zugang:	Volltext
Tags:	Tag hinzufügen Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!

container_end_page	20
container_issue	1
container_start_page	5
container_title	Clinical psychology (New York, N.Y.)
container_volume	23
creator	May, Alexis M. Klonsky, E. David
description	Most suicide ideators do not attempt suicide. Thus, it is useful to understand what differentiates attempters from ideators. We meta‐analyzed 27 studies comparing sociodemographic and clinical variables between attempters and ideators. When comparing ideators to nonsuicidal individuals, there were several large effects. For example, depression and PTSD were markedly elevated among ideators (d = .85–.90). In contrast, when comparing attempters to ideators, all 12 variables had negligible to moderate effects. Specifically, depression, alcohol use disorders, hopelessness, gender, race, marital status, and education all were similar in attempters and ideators (d = −.05 to .31). Anxiety disorders, PTSD, drug use disorders, and sexual abuse history were moderately elevated in attempters compared to ideators (d = .48–.52). Implications for theory and practice are discussed.
doi_str_mv	10.1037/h0101735
format	Article
fullrecord	<record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1780499589</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3995619651</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4726-f2da44a18533b19409e65bdaa4784b97c1516e9a534a8d2b2dc4be579ff468d03</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kd1q20AQhZfQQFy30EdY6E0pqJ3V_mmvinHiJJCmhqR175aVNKo3lS1ld0Xqt4-CmwRKydwMDN8c5swh5B2DTwy4_rwGBkxzeUAmTKgiywsJr8gEjDKZLAw_Iq9jvAEAZRRMiFutXaLHPia__TX4uMZIrwZf-RrpLCXc9AlDpIvQbZ7m5zW61IX4hc7oV0wum21du4s-0q6hyy7hNnnX0oWrHqg35LBxbcS3f_uUfF-cXM_Psotvp-fz2UVWCZ2rrMlrJ4RjheS8ZEaAQSXL2jmhC1EaXTHJFBonuXBFnZd5XYkSpTZNM9qsgU_Jh71uH7rbAWOyGx8rbFu3xW6IlukChDEPP5iS9_-gN90QRhPR5kJrBSNUvEQxraUA4EaN1Mc9VYUuxoCN7YPfuLCzDCwby1Z97C3LGVfPN_4XHuOzj_GNKNujd77F3Quidr68Wj7KZ_udMU7887Tjwm-rNNfSri5P7fH16sfy8ufc5vwexiCofA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2477605898</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>What Distinguishes Suicide Attempters From Suicide Ideators? A Meta-Analysis of Potential Factors</title><source>Wiley Online Library - AutoHoldings Journals</source><source>APA PsycARTICLES</source><creator>May, Alexis M. ; Klonsky, E. David</creator><creatorcontrib>May, Alexis M. ; Klonsky, E. David</creatorcontrib><description>Most suicide ideators do not attempt suicide. Thus, it is useful to understand what differentiates attempters from ideators. We meta‐analyzed 27 studies comparing sociodemographic and clinical variables between attempters and ideators. When comparing ideators to nonsuicidal individuals, there were several large effects. For example, depression and PTSD were markedly elevated among ideators (d = .85–.90). In contrast, when comparing attempters to ideators, all 12 variables had negligible to moderate effects. Specifically, depression, alcohol use disorders, hopelessness, gender, race, marital status, and education all were similar in attempters and ideators (d = −.05 to .31). Anxiety disorders, PTSD, drug use disorders, and sexual abuse history were moderately elevated in attempters compared to ideators (d = .48–.52). Implications for theory and practice are discussed.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0969-5893</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1468-2850</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1037/h0101735</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Washington: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>attempt ; Attempted Suicide ; Human ; ideation ; meta-analysis ; risk assessment ; Risk Factors ; Suicidal Ideation ; suicide ; Systematic review</subject><ispartof>Clinical psychology (New York, N.Y.), 2016-03, Vol.23 (1), p.5-20</ispartof><rights>2016 American Psychological Association. Published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc., on behalf of the American Psychological Association</rights><rights>Copyright © 2016 Society of Clinical Psychology</rights><rights>2016, American Psychological Association. Published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc., on behalf of the American Psychological Association. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4726-f2da44a18533b19409e65bdaa4784b97c1516e9a534a8d2b2dc4be579ff468d03</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4726-f2da44a18533b19409e65bdaa4784b97c1516e9a534a8d2b2dc4be579ff468d03</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fcpsp.12136$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fcpsp.12136$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>315,781,785,1418,27929,27930,45579,45580</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>May, Alexis M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Klonsky, E. David</creatorcontrib><title>What Distinguishes Suicide Attempters From Suicide Ideators? A Meta-Analysis of Potential Factors</title><title>Clinical psychology (New York, N.Y.)</title><addtitle>Clin Psychol Sci Pract</addtitle><description>Most suicide ideators do not attempt suicide. Thus, it is useful to understand what differentiates attempters from ideators. We meta‐analyzed 27 studies comparing sociodemographic and clinical variables between attempters and ideators. When comparing ideators to nonsuicidal individuals, there were several large effects. For example, depression and PTSD were markedly elevated among ideators (d = .85–.90). In contrast, when comparing attempters to ideators, all 12 variables had negligible to moderate effects. Specifically, depression, alcohol use disorders, hopelessness, gender, race, marital status, and education all were similar in attempters and ideators (d = −.05 to .31). Anxiety disorders, PTSD, drug use disorders, and sexual abuse history were moderately elevated in attempters compared to ideators (d = .48–.52). Implications for theory and practice are discussed.</description><subject>attempt</subject><subject>Attempted Suicide</subject><subject>Human</subject><subject>ideation</subject><subject>meta-analysis</subject><subject>risk assessment</subject><subject>Risk Factors</subject><subject>Suicidal Ideation</subject><subject>suicide</subject><subject>Systematic review</subject><issn>0969-5893</issn><issn>1468-2850</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kd1q20AQhZfQQFy30EdY6E0pqJ3V_mmvinHiJJCmhqR175aVNKo3lS1ld0Xqt4-CmwRKydwMDN8c5swh5B2DTwy4_rwGBkxzeUAmTKgiywsJr8gEjDKZLAw_Iq9jvAEAZRRMiFutXaLHPia__TX4uMZIrwZf-RrpLCXc9AlDpIvQbZ7m5zW61IX4hc7oV0wum21du4s-0q6hyy7hNnnX0oWrHqg35LBxbcS3f_uUfF-cXM_Psotvp-fz2UVWCZ2rrMlrJ4RjheS8ZEaAQSXL2jmhC1EaXTHJFBonuXBFnZd5XYkSpTZNM9qsgU_Jh71uH7rbAWOyGx8rbFu3xW6IlukChDEPP5iS9_-gN90QRhPR5kJrBSNUvEQxraUA4EaN1Mc9VYUuxoCN7YPfuLCzDCwby1Z97C3LGVfPN_4XHuOzj_GNKNujd77F3Quidr68Wj7KZ_udMU7887Tjwm-rNNfSri5P7fH16sfy8ufc5vwexiCofA</recordid><startdate>201603</startdate><enddate>201603</enddate><creator>May, Alexis M.</creator><creator>Klonsky, E. David</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>7RZ</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201603</creationdate><title>What Distinguishes Suicide Attempters From Suicide Ideators? A Meta-Analysis of Potential Factors</title><author>May, Alexis M. ; Klonsky, E. David</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4726-f2da44a18533b19409e65bdaa4784b97c1516e9a534a8d2b2dc4be579ff468d03</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>attempt</topic><topic>Attempted Suicide</topic><topic>Human</topic><topic>ideation</topic><topic>meta-analysis</topic><topic>risk assessment</topic><topic>Risk Factors</topic><topic>Suicidal Ideation</topic><topic>suicide</topic><topic>Systematic review</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>May, Alexis M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Klonsky, E. David</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>APA PsycArticles®</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><jtitle>Clinical psychology (New York, N.Y.)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>May, Alexis M.</au><au>Klonsky, E. David</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>What Distinguishes Suicide Attempters From Suicide Ideators? A Meta-Analysis of Potential Factors</atitle><jtitle>Clinical psychology (New York, N.Y.)</jtitle><addtitle>Clin Psychol Sci Pract</addtitle><date>2016-03</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>23</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>5</spage><epage>20</epage><pages>5-20</pages><issn>0969-5893</issn><eissn>1468-2850</eissn><abstract>Most suicide ideators do not attempt suicide. Thus, it is useful to understand what differentiates attempters from ideators. We meta‐analyzed 27 studies comparing sociodemographic and clinical variables between attempters and ideators. When comparing ideators to nonsuicidal individuals, there were several large effects. For example, depression and PTSD were markedly elevated among ideators (d = .85–.90). In contrast, when comparing attempters to ideators, all 12 variables had negligible to moderate effects. Specifically, depression, alcohol use disorders, hopelessness, gender, race, marital status, and education all were similar in attempters and ideators (d = −.05 to .31). Anxiety disorders, PTSD, drug use disorders, and sexual abuse history were moderately elevated in attempters compared to ideators (d = .48–.52). Implications for theory and practice are discussed.</abstract><cop>Washington</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><doi>10.1037/h0101735</doi><tpages>16</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext	fulltext
identifier	ISSN: 0969-5893
ispartof	Clinical psychology (New York, N.Y.), 2016-03, Vol.23 (1), p.5-20
issn	0969-5893 1468-2850
language	eng
recordid	cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1780499589
source	Wiley Online Library - AutoHoldings Journals; APA PsycARTICLES
subjects	attempt Attempted Suicide Human ideation meta-analysis risk assessment Risk Factors Suicidal Ideation suicide Systematic review
title	What Distinguishes Suicide Attempters From Suicide Ideators? A Meta-Analysis of Potential Factors
url	https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-11T03%3A04%3A54IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=What%20Distinguishes%20Suicide%20Attempters%20From%20Suicide%20Ideators?%20A%20Meta-Analysis%20of%20Potential%20Factors&rft.jtitle=Clinical%20psychology%20(New%20York,%20N.Y.)&rft.au=May,%20Alexis%20M.&rft.date=2016-03&rft.volume=23&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=5&rft.epage=20&rft.pages=5-20&rft.issn=0969-5893&rft.eissn=1468-2850&rft_id=info:doi/10.1037/h0101735&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3995619651%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2477605898&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true