Enjoyable life: Planning, amenity and the contested terrain of urban biopolitics

This article explores the connections between urban planning and a particular form of biopolitics. These connections are investigated by looking at the emergence of “enjoyment” as a planning concern in late 1960s Halifax, Nova Scotia. This new concern, the article suggests, emerged as a result of a...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Environment and planning. D, Society & space Society & space, 2015-10, Vol.33 (5), p.850-868
1. Verfasser: Rutland, Ted
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 868
container_issue 5
container_start_page 850
container_title Environment and planning. D, Society & space
container_volume 33
creator Rutland, Ted
description This article explores the connections between urban planning and a particular form of biopolitics. These connections are investigated by looking at the emergence of “enjoyment” as a planning concern in late 1960s Halifax, Nova Scotia. This new concern, the article suggests, emerged as a result of a political struggle involving activist groups, a newly formed state agency, and elements of the post-World War II political establishment. Wedded to this concern were two essential planning policies: the promotion of “amenity” (especially in the downtown) and the introduction of structured “citizen involvement” in planning decisions. Together, these two policies inaugurated a new form of planning and biopolitics. The promotion of amenity aimed to create a more enjoyable life through the alteration of prevailing conditions of life, while citizen involvement routed planning decisions – including the precise meaning of amenity – through “liberal” practices of government. Most importantly, the new policies were shaped by the enactment of normative divisions within the population, a characteristically biopolitical effect. The result of these divisions was a highly unequal process of citizen involvement and a correspondingly uneven terrain of enjoyment: a terrain whose development and use would provide enjoyment for “normative” populations, while leaving “pathological” populations unaffected or worse.
doi_str_mv 10.1177/0263775815599312
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1780142455</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_0263775815599312</sage_id><sourcerecordid>1780142455</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-95af29d67f5c3aa5b3848b9f37b6afa65346dd2e3688912bf856330c35f710523</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kL1PwzAQxS0EEqWwM3pkIGD7_BGzoYovqRIdYI6cxC6uUrvYydD_HldlQmI6nd7vnd49hK4puaNUqXvCJCglaiqE1kDZCZpRrlgFHOAUzQ5yddDP0UXOG0IIaE5naPUUNnFv2sHiwTv7gFeDCcGH9S02Wxv8uMcm9Hj8sriLYbR5tGWzKRkfcHR4Sq0JuPVxFwc_-i5fojNnhmyvfuccfT4_fSxeq-X7y9vicVl1IORYaWEc071UTnRgjGih5nWrHahWGmekAC77nlmQda0pa10tJAApZqcoEQzm6OZ4d5fi91RyNVufOzuU-DZOuaGqJpQzLkRByRHtUsw5Wdfskt-atG8oaQ7lNX_LK5bqaMlmbZtNnFIoz_zP_wCLDW3m</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1780142455</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Enjoyable life: Planning, amenity and the contested terrain of urban biopolitics</title><source>SAGE Complete A-Z List</source><creator>Rutland, Ted</creator><creatorcontrib>Rutland, Ted</creatorcontrib><description>This article explores the connections between urban planning and a particular form of biopolitics. These connections are investigated by looking at the emergence of “enjoyment” as a planning concern in late 1960s Halifax, Nova Scotia. This new concern, the article suggests, emerged as a result of a political struggle involving activist groups, a newly formed state agency, and elements of the post-World War II political establishment. Wedded to this concern were two essential planning policies: the promotion of “amenity” (especially in the downtown) and the introduction of structured “citizen involvement” in planning decisions. Together, these two policies inaugurated a new form of planning and biopolitics. The promotion of amenity aimed to create a more enjoyable life through the alteration of prevailing conditions of life, while citizen involvement routed planning decisions – including the precise meaning of amenity – through “liberal” practices of government. Most importantly, the new policies were shaped by the enactment of normative divisions within the population, a characteristically biopolitical effect. The result of these divisions was a highly unequal process of citizen involvement and a correspondingly uneven terrain of enjoyment: a terrain whose development and use would provide enjoyment for “normative” populations, while leaving “pathological” populations unaffected or worse.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0263-7758</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1472-3433</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/0263775815599312</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London, England: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Biopolitics ; Canadian history ; Citizen participation ; Halifax Nova Scotia Canada ; Urban planning</subject><ispartof>Environment and planning. D, Society &amp; space, 2015-10, Vol.33 (5), p.850-868</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2015</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-95af29d67f5c3aa5b3848b9f37b6afa65346dd2e3688912bf856330c35f710523</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-95af29d67f5c3aa5b3848b9f37b6afa65346dd2e3688912bf856330c35f710523</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/0263775815599312$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0263775815599312$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,21818,27923,27924,43620,43621</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Rutland, Ted</creatorcontrib><title>Enjoyable life: Planning, amenity and the contested terrain of urban biopolitics</title><title>Environment and planning. D, Society &amp; space</title><description>This article explores the connections between urban planning and a particular form of biopolitics. These connections are investigated by looking at the emergence of “enjoyment” as a planning concern in late 1960s Halifax, Nova Scotia. This new concern, the article suggests, emerged as a result of a political struggle involving activist groups, a newly formed state agency, and elements of the post-World War II political establishment. Wedded to this concern were two essential planning policies: the promotion of “amenity” (especially in the downtown) and the introduction of structured “citizen involvement” in planning decisions. Together, these two policies inaugurated a new form of planning and biopolitics. The promotion of amenity aimed to create a more enjoyable life through the alteration of prevailing conditions of life, while citizen involvement routed planning decisions – including the precise meaning of amenity – through “liberal” practices of government. Most importantly, the new policies were shaped by the enactment of normative divisions within the population, a characteristically biopolitical effect. The result of these divisions was a highly unequal process of citizen involvement and a correspondingly uneven terrain of enjoyment: a terrain whose development and use would provide enjoyment for “normative” populations, while leaving “pathological” populations unaffected or worse.</description><subject>Biopolitics</subject><subject>Canadian history</subject><subject>Citizen participation</subject><subject>Halifax Nova Scotia Canada</subject><subject>Urban planning</subject><issn>0263-7758</issn><issn>1472-3433</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kL1PwzAQxS0EEqWwM3pkIGD7_BGzoYovqRIdYI6cxC6uUrvYydD_HldlQmI6nd7vnd49hK4puaNUqXvCJCglaiqE1kDZCZpRrlgFHOAUzQ5yddDP0UXOG0IIaE5naPUUNnFv2sHiwTv7gFeDCcGH9S02Wxv8uMcm9Hj8sriLYbR5tGWzKRkfcHR4Sq0JuPVxFwc_-i5fojNnhmyvfuccfT4_fSxeq-X7y9vicVl1IORYaWEc071UTnRgjGih5nWrHahWGmekAC77nlmQda0pa10tJAApZqcoEQzm6OZ4d5fi91RyNVufOzuU-DZOuaGqJpQzLkRByRHtUsw5Wdfskt-atG8oaQ7lNX_LK5bqaMlmbZtNnFIoz_zP_wCLDW3m</recordid><startdate>201510</startdate><enddate>201510</enddate><creator>Rutland, Ted</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201510</creationdate><title>Enjoyable life: Planning, amenity and the contested terrain of urban biopolitics</title><author>Rutland, Ted</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-95af29d67f5c3aa5b3848b9f37b6afa65346dd2e3688912bf856330c35f710523</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Biopolitics</topic><topic>Canadian history</topic><topic>Citizen participation</topic><topic>Halifax Nova Scotia Canada</topic><topic>Urban planning</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Rutland, Ted</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><jtitle>Environment and planning. D, Society &amp; space</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Rutland, Ted</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Enjoyable life: Planning, amenity and the contested terrain of urban biopolitics</atitle><jtitle>Environment and planning. D, Society &amp; space</jtitle><date>2015-10</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>33</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>850</spage><epage>868</epage><pages>850-868</pages><issn>0263-7758</issn><eissn>1472-3433</eissn><abstract>This article explores the connections between urban planning and a particular form of biopolitics. These connections are investigated by looking at the emergence of “enjoyment” as a planning concern in late 1960s Halifax, Nova Scotia. This new concern, the article suggests, emerged as a result of a political struggle involving activist groups, a newly formed state agency, and elements of the post-World War II political establishment. Wedded to this concern were two essential planning policies: the promotion of “amenity” (especially in the downtown) and the introduction of structured “citizen involvement” in planning decisions. Together, these two policies inaugurated a new form of planning and biopolitics. The promotion of amenity aimed to create a more enjoyable life through the alteration of prevailing conditions of life, while citizen involvement routed planning decisions – including the precise meaning of amenity – through “liberal” practices of government. Most importantly, the new policies were shaped by the enactment of normative divisions within the population, a characteristically biopolitical effect. The result of these divisions was a highly unequal process of citizen involvement and a correspondingly uneven terrain of enjoyment: a terrain whose development and use would provide enjoyment for “normative” populations, while leaving “pathological” populations unaffected or worse.</abstract><cop>London, England</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><doi>10.1177/0263775815599312</doi><tpages>19</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0263-7758
ispartof Environment and planning. D, Society & space, 2015-10, Vol.33 (5), p.850-868
issn 0263-7758
1472-3433
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1780142455
source SAGE Complete A-Z List
subjects Biopolitics
Canadian history
Citizen participation
Halifax Nova Scotia Canada
Urban planning
title Enjoyable life: Planning, amenity and the contested terrain of urban biopolitics
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-11T02%3A50%3A05IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Enjoyable%20life:%20Planning,%20amenity%20and%20the%20contested%20terrain%20of%20urban%20biopolitics&rft.jtitle=Environment%20and%20planning.%20D,%20Society%20&%20space&rft.au=Rutland,%20Ted&rft.date=2015-10&rft.volume=33&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=850&rft.epage=868&rft.pages=850-868&rft.issn=0263-7758&rft.eissn=1472-3433&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/0263775815599312&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1780142455%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1780142455&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_sage_id=10.1177_0263775815599312&rfr_iscdi=true