Reputation of Terror Groups Dataset: Measuring popularity of terror groups
Violence against civilians is not the only tool among the arsenal of terrorists; it is only one of many. Up until now, there did not exist any quantitative data on the different strategies adopted by terror groups that measured the group's popularity or its public support. The Reputation of Ter...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of peace research 2016-03, Vol.53 (2), p.268-277 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 277 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 268 |
container_title | Journal of peace research |
container_volume | 53 |
creator | Tokdemir, Efe Akcinaroglu, Seden |
description | Violence against civilians is not the only tool among the arsenal of terrorists; it is only one of many. Up until now, there did not exist any quantitative data on the different strategies adopted by terror groups that measured the group's popularity or its public support. The Reputation of Terror Groups dataset (RTG) addresses this void. To understand which terror groups build different types of reputation, to analyze the consequences of reputation building and how reputation changes with and influences conflict dynamics, we need to be able to measure the loaded concept of reputation. RTG is the first systematic measure for the reputation of terror groups across countries or time. The dataset includes 443 terror groups operating across 31 years, which makes a total of 2,641 observations. The large sample size of the RTG dataset allows comparisons of popularity among groups. Additionally, the dataset adopts a multivariable approach by examining multiple aspects of both positive and negative reputation building. Another novelty of the dataset is its measure of reputation with regard to each target, mainly its constituency and target audience. The RTG data can help us come up with new and novel ways of understanding terror groups, and contribute to bridging the gap between micro-and mezzo-level studies in the literature by showing how terror groups adopt different strategies in their constituency and target audience to pursue their goals. In this article, we give an overview assessment of the RTG dataset, display some interesting trends in the data, and explain the data collection procedure, its challenges, and its limitations. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1177/0022343315626506 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1780141136</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>43920014</jstor_id><sage_id>10.1177_0022343315626506</sage_id><sourcerecordid>43920014</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c350t-e71538ab9a6942ff1849f22a0f5cf324b2cf18bfdd18435544d3e65c9b3c59613</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp10M9LwzAUB_AgCs7p3YtQ8OKl-vKzrTeZOpWJIPNc0iwZHV1Tk_Sw_97UisjAUyDfz3s8vgidY7jGOMtuAAihjFLMBREcxAGaYCYgpTzLD9FkiNMhP0Yn3m8AQBQAE_Tyrrs-yFDbNrEmWWrnrEvmzvadT-5lkF6H2-RVS9-7ul0nne36Rro67AYeRr7-5qfoyMjG67Ofd4o-Hh-Ws6d08TZ_nt0tUkU5hFRnmNNcVoUUBSPG4JwVhhAJhitDCauIin-VWa1iQjlnbEW14KqoqOKFwHSKrsa9nbOfvfah3NZe6aaRrba9L3GWA2YYUxHp5R7d2N618bqosqGtTORRwaiUs947bcrO1VvpdiWGcii33C83jqTjiJdr_Wfp__5i9BsfrPvdz2hBIB5LvwAXfYFs</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1774331768</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Reputation of Terror Groups Dataset: Measuring popularity of terror groups</title><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><source>PAIS Index</source><source>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</source><source>SAGE Complete</source><creator>Tokdemir, Efe ; Akcinaroglu, Seden</creator><creatorcontrib>Tokdemir, Efe ; Akcinaroglu, Seden</creatorcontrib><description>Violence against civilians is not the only tool among the arsenal of terrorists; it is only one of many. Up until now, there did not exist any quantitative data on the different strategies adopted by terror groups that measured the group's popularity or its public support. The Reputation of Terror Groups dataset (RTG) addresses this void. To understand which terror groups build different types of reputation, to analyze the consequences of reputation building and how reputation changes with and influences conflict dynamics, we need to be able to measure the loaded concept of reputation. RTG is the first systematic measure for the reputation of terror groups across countries or time. The dataset includes 443 terror groups operating across 31 years, which makes a total of 2,641 observations. The large sample size of the RTG dataset allows comparisons of popularity among groups. Additionally, the dataset adopts a multivariable approach by examining multiple aspects of both positive and negative reputation building. Another novelty of the dataset is its measure of reputation with regard to each target, mainly its constituency and target audience. The RTG data can help us come up with new and novel ways of understanding terror groups, and contribute to bridging the gap between micro-and mezzo-level studies in the literature by showing how terror groups adopt different strategies in their constituency and target audience to pursue their goals. In this article, we give an overview assessment of the RTG dataset, display some interesting trends in the data, and explain the data collection procedure, its challenges, and its limitations.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-3433</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1460-3578</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/0022343315626506</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JPERB6</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London, England: SAGE Publications Ltd</publisher><subject>Conflict ; Constituency ; Constituents ; Data collection ; Datasets ; Funding ; Goals ; Public goods ; Public support ; Quantitative methods ; Religious terrorism ; Reputation ; Reputations ; Special Data Features ; Strategies ; Target audiences ; Terrorism ; Terrorists ; Violence ; Violence against civilians</subject><ispartof>Journal of peace research, 2016-03, Vol.53 (2), p.268-277</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2016 Peace Research Institute Oslo</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2016</rights><rights>Copyright Sage Publications Ltd. Mar 2016</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c350t-e71538ab9a6942ff1849f22a0f5cf324b2cf18bfdd18435544d3e65c9b3c59613</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/43920014$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/43920014$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,799,21798,27843,27901,27902,43597,43598,57992,58225</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Tokdemir, Efe</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Akcinaroglu, Seden</creatorcontrib><title>Reputation of Terror Groups Dataset: Measuring popularity of terror groups</title><title>Journal of peace research</title><description>Violence against civilians is not the only tool among the arsenal of terrorists; it is only one of many. Up until now, there did not exist any quantitative data on the different strategies adopted by terror groups that measured the group's popularity or its public support. The Reputation of Terror Groups dataset (RTG) addresses this void. To understand which terror groups build different types of reputation, to analyze the consequences of reputation building and how reputation changes with and influences conflict dynamics, we need to be able to measure the loaded concept of reputation. RTG is the first systematic measure for the reputation of terror groups across countries or time. The dataset includes 443 terror groups operating across 31 years, which makes a total of 2,641 observations. The large sample size of the RTG dataset allows comparisons of popularity among groups. Additionally, the dataset adopts a multivariable approach by examining multiple aspects of both positive and negative reputation building. Another novelty of the dataset is its measure of reputation with regard to each target, mainly its constituency and target audience. The RTG data can help us come up with new and novel ways of understanding terror groups, and contribute to bridging the gap between micro-and mezzo-level studies in the literature by showing how terror groups adopt different strategies in their constituency and target audience to pursue their goals. In this article, we give an overview assessment of the RTG dataset, display some interesting trends in the data, and explain the data collection procedure, its challenges, and its limitations.</description><subject>Conflict</subject><subject>Constituency</subject><subject>Constituents</subject><subject>Data collection</subject><subject>Datasets</subject><subject>Funding</subject><subject>Goals</subject><subject>Public goods</subject><subject>Public support</subject><subject>Quantitative methods</subject><subject>Religious terrorism</subject><subject>Reputation</subject><subject>Reputations</subject><subject>Special Data Features</subject><subject>Strategies</subject><subject>Target audiences</subject><subject>Terrorism</subject><subject>Terrorists</subject><subject>Violence</subject><subject>Violence against civilians</subject><issn>0022-3433</issn><issn>1460-3578</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7TQ</sourceid><sourceid>7UB</sourceid><recordid>eNp10M9LwzAUB_AgCs7p3YtQ8OKl-vKzrTeZOpWJIPNc0iwZHV1Tk_Sw_97UisjAUyDfz3s8vgidY7jGOMtuAAihjFLMBREcxAGaYCYgpTzLD9FkiNMhP0Yn3m8AQBQAE_Tyrrs-yFDbNrEmWWrnrEvmzvadT-5lkF6H2-RVS9-7ul0nne36Rro67AYeRr7-5qfoyMjG67Ofd4o-Hh-Ws6d08TZ_nt0tUkU5hFRnmNNcVoUUBSPG4JwVhhAJhitDCauIin-VWa1iQjlnbEW14KqoqOKFwHSKrsa9nbOfvfah3NZe6aaRrba9L3GWA2YYUxHp5R7d2N618bqosqGtTORRwaiUs947bcrO1VvpdiWGcii33C83jqTjiJdr_Wfp__5i9BsfrPvdz2hBIB5LvwAXfYFs</recordid><startdate>20160301</startdate><enddate>20160301</enddate><creator>Tokdemir, Efe</creator><creator>Akcinaroglu, Seden</creator><general>SAGE Publications Ltd</general><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>Sage Publications Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TQ</scope><scope>7UB</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>DHY</scope><scope>DON</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20160301</creationdate><title>Reputation of Terror Groups Dataset: Measuring popularity of terror groups</title><author>Tokdemir, Efe ; Akcinaroglu, Seden</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c350t-e71538ab9a6942ff1849f22a0f5cf324b2cf18bfdd18435544d3e65c9b3c59613</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Conflict</topic><topic>Constituency</topic><topic>Constituents</topic><topic>Data collection</topic><topic>Datasets</topic><topic>Funding</topic><topic>Goals</topic><topic>Public goods</topic><topic>Public support</topic><topic>Quantitative methods</topic><topic>Religious terrorism</topic><topic>Reputation</topic><topic>Reputations</topic><topic>Special Data Features</topic><topic>Strategies</topic><topic>Target audiences</topic><topic>Terrorism</topic><topic>Terrorists</topic><topic>Violence</topic><topic>Violence against civilians</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Tokdemir, Efe</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Akcinaroglu, Seden</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>PAIS Index</collection><collection>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>PAIS International</collection><collection>PAIS International (Ovid)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><jtitle>Journal of peace research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Tokdemir, Efe</au><au>Akcinaroglu, Seden</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Reputation of Terror Groups Dataset: Measuring popularity of terror groups</atitle><jtitle>Journal of peace research</jtitle><date>2016-03-01</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>53</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>268</spage><epage>277</epage><pages>268-277</pages><issn>0022-3433</issn><eissn>1460-3578</eissn><coden>JPERB6</coden><abstract>Violence against civilians is not the only tool among the arsenal of terrorists; it is only one of many. Up until now, there did not exist any quantitative data on the different strategies adopted by terror groups that measured the group's popularity or its public support. The Reputation of Terror Groups dataset (RTG) addresses this void. To understand which terror groups build different types of reputation, to analyze the consequences of reputation building and how reputation changes with and influences conflict dynamics, we need to be able to measure the loaded concept of reputation. RTG is the first systematic measure for the reputation of terror groups across countries or time. The dataset includes 443 terror groups operating across 31 years, which makes a total of 2,641 observations. The large sample size of the RTG dataset allows comparisons of popularity among groups. Additionally, the dataset adopts a multivariable approach by examining multiple aspects of both positive and negative reputation building. Another novelty of the dataset is its measure of reputation with regard to each target, mainly its constituency and target audience. The RTG data can help us come up with new and novel ways of understanding terror groups, and contribute to bridging the gap between micro-and mezzo-level studies in the literature by showing how terror groups adopt different strategies in their constituency and target audience to pursue their goals. In this article, we give an overview assessment of the RTG dataset, display some interesting trends in the data, and explain the data collection procedure, its challenges, and its limitations.</abstract><cop>London, England</cop><pub>SAGE Publications Ltd</pub><doi>10.1177/0022343315626506</doi><tpages>10</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0022-3433 |
ispartof | Journal of peace research, 2016-03, Vol.53 (2), p.268-277 |
issn | 0022-3433 1460-3578 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1780141136 |
source | Jstor Complete Legacy; PAIS Index; Worldwide Political Science Abstracts; SAGE Complete |
subjects | Conflict Constituency Constituents Data collection Datasets Funding Goals Public goods Public support Quantitative methods Religious terrorism Reputation Reputations Special Data Features Strategies Target audiences Terrorism Terrorists Violence Violence against civilians |
title | Reputation of Terror Groups Dataset: Measuring popularity of terror groups |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-19T01%3A54%3A29IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Reputation%20of%20Terror%20Groups%20Dataset:%20Measuring%20popularity%20of%20terror%20groups&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20peace%20research&rft.au=Tokdemir,%20Efe&rft.date=2016-03-01&rft.volume=53&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=268&rft.epage=277&rft.pages=268-277&rft.issn=0022-3433&rft.eissn=1460-3578&rft.coden=JPERB6&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/0022343315626506&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E43920014%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1774331768&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=43920014&rft_sage_id=10.1177_0022343315626506&rfr_iscdi=true |