Survey methods for assessing land cover map accuracy

Issue Title: Special Issue on Map Accuracy The increasing availability of digital photographic materials has fueled efforts by agencies and organizations to generate land cover maps for states, regions, and the United States as a whole. Regardless of the information sources and classification method...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Environmental and ecological statistics 2003-09, Vol.10 (3), p.309-331
Hauptverfasser: Nusser, Sarah M, Klaas, Erwin E
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 331
container_issue 3
container_start_page 309
container_title Environmental and ecological statistics
container_volume 10
creator Nusser, Sarah M
Klaas, Erwin E
description Issue Title: Special Issue on Map Accuracy The increasing availability of digital photographic materials has fueled efforts by agencies and organizations to generate land cover maps for states, regions, and the United States as a whole. Regardless of the information sources and classification methods used, land cover maps are subject to numerous sources of error. In order to understand the quality of the information contained in these maps, it is desirable to generate statistically valid estimates of accuracy rates describing misclassification errors. We explored a full sample survey framework for creating accuracy assessment study designs that balance statistical and operational considerations in relation to study objectives for a regional assessment of GAP land cover maps. We focused not only on appropriate sample designs and estimation approaches, but on aspects of the data collection process, such as gaining cooperation of land owners and using pixel clusters as an observation unit. The approach was tested in a pilot study to assess the accuracy of Iowa GAP land cover maps. A stratified two-stage cluster sampling design addressed sample size requirements for land covers and the need for geographic spread while minimizing operational effort. Recruitment methods used for private land owners yielded high response rates, minimizing a source of nonresponse error. Collecting data for a 9-pixel cluster centered on the sampled pixel was simple to implement, and provided better information on rarer vegetation classes as well as substantial gains in precision relative to observing data at a single-pixel.[PUBLICATION ABSTRACT]
doi_str_mv 10.1023/A:1025107023980
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_17799423</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2158175461</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-p211t-d39bcbfa17581fdaa5cb3fabb3669ca1d17fa4e81c00baccb15c67132c1c8e7f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdjsFLwzAYxYMoOKdnr8GDt-r3JU3TeBvDqTDwoJ5Lkia60TY1aQf77w3oydPvPXj8eIRcI9whMH6_esgQCDIXVcMJWaCQvOAA6jRnLlhRCxDn5CKlPQCUyMSClG9zPLgj7d30FdpEfYhUp-RS2g2ftNNDS204uEh7PVJt7Ry1PV6SM6-75K7-uCQfm8f39XOxfX16Wa-2xcgQp6LlyljjNUpRo2-1FtZwr43hVaWsxhal16Wr0QKY7DYobCWRM4u2dtLzJbn99Y4xfM8uTU2_S9Z1-ZYLc2pQSqVKxvPw5t9wH-Y45G-NFBLqCkrgP4dMVS0</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>757086040</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Survey methods for assessing land cover map accuracy</title><source>Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals</source><creator>Nusser, Sarah M ; Klaas, Erwin E</creator><creatorcontrib>Nusser, Sarah M ; Klaas, Erwin E</creatorcontrib><description>Issue Title: Special Issue on Map Accuracy The increasing availability of digital photographic materials has fueled efforts by agencies and organizations to generate land cover maps for states, regions, and the United States as a whole. Regardless of the information sources and classification methods used, land cover maps are subject to numerous sources of error. In order to understand the quality of the information contained in these maps, it is desirable to generate statistically valid estimates of accuracy rates describing misclassification errors. We explored a full sample survey framework for creating accuracy assessment study designs that balance statistical and operational considerations in relation to study objectives for a regional assessment of GAP land cover maps. We focused not only on appropriate sample designs and estimation approaches, but on aspects of the data collection process, such as gaining cooperation of land owners and using pixel clusters as an observation unit. The approach was tested in a pilot study to assess the accuracy of Iowa GAP land cover maps. A stratified two-stage cluster sampling design addressed sample size requirements for land covers and the need for geographic spread while minimizing operational effort. Recruitment methods used for private land owners yielded high response rates, minimizing a source of nonresponse error. Collecting data for a 9-pixel cluster centered on the sampled pixel was simple to implement, and provided better information on rarer vegetation classes as well as substantial gains in precision relative to observing data at a single-pixel.[PUBLICATION ABSTRACT]</description><identifier>ISSN: 1352-8505</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-3009</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1023/A:1025107023980</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Dordrecht: Springer Nature B.V</publisher><subject>Accuracy ; Data collection ; Landowners ; Private property ; Studies</subject><ispartof>Environmental and ecological statistics, 2003-09, Vol.10 (3), p.309-331</ispartof><rights>Kluwer AcademicPublishers 2003</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27903,27904</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Nusser, Sarah M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Klaas, Erwin E</creatorcontrib><title>Survey methods for assessing land cover map accuracy</title><title>Environmental and ecological statistics</title><description>Issue Title: Special Issue on Map Accuracy The increasing availability of digital photographic materials has fueled efforts by agencies and organizations to generate land cover maps for states, regions, and the United States as a whole. Regardless of the information sources and classification methods used, land cover maps are subject to numerous sources of error. In order to understand the quality of the information contained in these maps, it is desirable to generate statistically valid estimates of accuracy rates describing misclassification errors. We explored a full sample survey framework for creating accuracy assessment study designs that balance statistical and operational considerations in relation to study objectives for a regional assessment of GAP land cover maps. We focused not only on appropriate sample designs and estimation approaches, but on aspects of the data collection process, such as gaining cooperation of land owners and using pixel clusters as an observation unit. The approach was tested in a pilot study to assess the accuracy of Iowa GAP land cover maps. A stratified two-stage cluster sampling design addressed sample size requirements for land covers and the need for geographic spread while minimizing operational effort. Recruitment methods used for private land owners yielded high response rates, minimizing a source of nonresponse error. Collecting data for a 9-pixel cluster centered on the sampled pixel was simple to implement, and provided better information on rarer vegetation classes as well as substantial gains in precision relative to observing data at a single-pixel.[PUBLICATION ABSTRACT]</description><subject>Accuracy</subject><subject>Data collection</subject><subject>Landowners</subject><subject>Private property</subject><subject>Studies</subject><issn>1352-8505</issn><issn>1573-3009</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2003</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNpdjsFLwzAYxYMoOKdnr8GDt-r3JU3TeBvDqTDwoJ5Lkia60TY1aQf77w3oydPvPXj8eIRcI9whMH6_esgQCDIXVcMJWaCQvOAA6jRnLlhRCxDn5CKlPQCUyMSClG9zPLgj7d30FdpEfYhUp-RS2g2ftNNDS204uEh7PVJt7Ry1PV6SM6-75K7-uCQfm8f39XOxfX16Wa-2xcgQp6LlyljjNUpRo2-1FtZwr43hVaWsxhal16Wr0QKY7DYobCWRM4u2dtLzJbn99Y4xfM8uTU2_S9Z1-ZYLc2pQSqVKxvPw5t9wH-Y45G-NFBLqCkrgP4dMVS0</recordid><startdate>20030901</startdate><enddate>20030901</enddate><creator>Nusser, Sarah M</creator><creator>Klaas, Erwin E</creator><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AL</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BKSAR</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H97</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>K7-</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M0N</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PCBAR</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>SOI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20030901</creationdate><title>Survey methods for assessing land cover map accuracy</title><author>Nusser, Sarah M ; Klaas, Erwin E</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p211t-d39bcbfa17581fdaa5cb3fabb3669ca1d17fa4e81c00baccb15c67132c1c8e7f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2003</creationdate><topic>Accuracy</topic><topic>Data collection</topic><topic>Landowners</topic><topic>Private property</topic><topic>Studies</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Nusser, Sarah M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Klaas, Erwin E</creatorcontrib><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Computing Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric &amp; Aquatic Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 3: Aquatic Pollution &amp; Environmental Quality</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>Computer Science Database</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Computing Database</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric &amp; Aquatic Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Environmental and ecological statistics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Nusser, Sarah M</au><au>Klaas, Erwin E</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Survey methods for assessing land cover map accuracy</atitle><jtitle>Environmental and ecological statistics</jtitle><date>2003-09-01</date><risdate>2003</risdate><volume>10</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>309</spage><epage>331</epage><pages>309-331</pages><issn>1352-8505</issn><eissn>1573-3009</eissn><abstract>Issue Title: Special Issue on Map Accuracy The increasing availability of digital photographic materials has fueled efforts by agencies and organizations to generate land cover maps for states, regions, and the United States as a whole. Regardless of the information sources and classification methods used, land cover maps are subject to numerous sources of error. In order to understand the quality of the information contained in these maps, it is desirable to generate statistically valid estimates of accuracy rates describing misclassification errors. We explored a full sample survey framework for creating accuracy assessment study designs that balance statistical and operational considerations in relation to study objectives for a regional assessment of GAP land cover maps. We focused not only on appropriate sample designs and estimation approaches, but on aspects of the data collection process, such as gaining cooperation of land owners and using pixel clusters as an observation unit. The approach was tested in a pilot study to assess the accuracy of Iowa GAP land cover maps. A stratified two-stage cluster sampling design addressed sample size requirements for land covers and the need for geographic spread while minimizing operational effort. Recruitment methods used for private land owners yielded high response rates, minimizing a source of nonresponse error. Collecting data for a 9-pixel cluster centered on the sampled pixel was simple to implement, and provided better information on rarer vegetation classes as well as substantial gains in precision relative to observing data at a single-pixel.[PUBLICATION ABSTRACT]</abstract><cop>Dordrecht</cop><pub>Springer Nature B.V</pub><doi>10.1023/A:1025107023980</doi><tpages>23</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1352-8505
ispartof Environmental and ecological statistics, 2003-09, Vol.10 (3), p.309-331
issn 1352-8505
1573-3009
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_17799423
source Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals
subjects Accuracy
Data collection
Landowners
Private property
Studies
title Survey methods for assessing land cover map accuracy
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-23T08%3A49%3A07IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Survey%20methods%20for%20assessing%20land%20cover%20map%20accuracy&rft.jtitle=Environmental%20and%20ecological%20statistics&rft.au=Nusser,%20Sarah%20M&rft.date=2003-09-01&rft.volume=10&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=309&rft.epage=331&rft.pages=309-331&rft.issn=1352-8505&rft.eissn=1573-3009&rft_id=info:doi/10.1023/A:1025107023980&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E2158175461%3C/proquest%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=757086040&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true