Endometriosis-related infertility: assisted reproductive technology has no adverse impact on pain or quality-of-life scores
Objective To evaluate the impact of assisted reproduction technology (ART) on painful symptoms and quality of life (QoL) in women who have endometriosis as compared with disease-free women. Design Prospective controlled, observational cohort study. Setting University hospital. Patient(s) Two hundred...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Fertility and sterility 2016-04, Vol.105 (4), p.978-987.e4 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 987.e4 |
---|---|
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 978 |
container_title | Fertility and sterility |
container_volume | 105 |
creator | Santulli, Pietro, M.D., Ph.D Bourdon, Mathilde Presse, Marion Gayet, Vanessa, M.D Marcellin, Louis, M.D., Ph.D Prunet, Caroline de Ziegler, Dominique, M.D Chapron, Charles, M.D |
description | Objective To evaluate the impact of assisted reproduction technology (ART) on painful symptoms and quality of life (QoL) in women who have endometriosis as compared with disease-free women. Design Prospective controlled, observational cohort study. Setting University hospital. Patient(s) Two hundred and sixty-four matched-pairs of endometriosis and disease-free women undergoing ART. Intervention(s) Assessment of pain evolution using visual analogue scale (VAS) during ART; QoL assessment with the Fertility Quality of Life (FertiQoL) tool. Main Outcome Measure(s) VAS pain intensities relative to dysmenorrhea, dyspareunia, noncyclic chronic pelvic pain (NCCPP), gastrointestinal pain, lower urinary tract pain; trends for VAS change between postretrieval and baseline evaluation; FertiQoL score; and statistical analyses conducted using univariate and adjusted multiple linear regression models. Result(s) After excluding canceled cycles and patients lost to follow-up observation, 102 women with endometriosis and 104 disease-free women were retained for the study. The trends for VAS change between the postretrieval and baseline evaluations in the women with endometriosis compared with the disease-free women revealed a statistically significant pain decrease for dysmenorrhea (−1.35 ± 3.23 and 0.61 ± 4.00) and dyspareunia (−1.19 ± 2.58 and 0.14 ± 2.06). For NCCPP, gastrointestinal symptoms, and lower urinary tract symptoms, there were no statistically significant differences between the groups. After multiple linear regression, no worsening of pain was observed in the endometriosis group as compared with disease-free group. In addition subgroup analysis according to endometriosis phenotype failed to show any increase of pain. The quality of life in the endometriosis group was comparable to that of the disease-free group. Conclusion(s) Assisted reproduction technology did not exacerbate the symptoms of endometriosis or negatively impact QoL in women with endometriosis as compared with disease-free women. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2015.12.006 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1778709682</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>1_s2_0_S0015028215021755</els_id><sourcerecordid>1778709682</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c479t-490bcb8c71919c8b18b4fee85fec429cfa61bdf2a6e22d5a4216f3c529cbfcd93</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNUs1uFSEUJkZjb6uvYFi6mSkwAzPjwkSb-pM06UJdEwYOlusM3AJzk5v0YXyWPlmZ3KqJq24OCd8ffDkIYUpqSqg439YWYvYpl1kzQnlNWU2IeIY2lHNRccGb52hDClIR1rMTdJrSlhQG7dhLdMJE1wrasA26u_QmzJCjC8mlKsKkMhjs_BrgJpcP77BKBVpvI-xiMIvObg84g77xYQo_D_hGpfvfPmBl9hATYDfvlM44eLxTzuMQ8e2iVq8q2GpyFnDSIUJ6hV5YNSV4_XieoR-fLr9ffKmurj9_vfhwVem2G3LVDmTUY687OtBB9yPtx9YC9NyCbtmgrRJ0NJYpAYwZrlpGhW00L9BotRmaM_T26Fuef7tAynJ2ScM0KQ9hSZJ2Xd-RQfSsUPsjVceQUgQrd9HNKh4kJXLtXm7lv-7l2r2kTJZmi_TNY8oyzmD-Cv-UXQgfjwQof907iDJpB16DcRF0lia4p6S8_89ET847raZfcIC0DUv0pUtJZSoC-W3dgXUF1kk7zpsHLR-08g</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1778709682</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Endometriosis-related infertility: assisted reproductive technology has no adverse impact on pain or quality-of-life scores</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Santulli, Pietro, M.D., Ph.D ; Bourdon, Mathilde ; Presse, Marion ; Gayet, Vanessa, M.D ; Marcellin, Louis, M.D., Ph.D ; Prunet, Caroline ; de Ziegler, Dominique, M.D ; Chapron, Charles, M.D</creator><creatorcontrib>Santulli, Pietro, M.D., Ph.D ; Bourdon, Mathilde ; Presse, Marion ; Gayet, Vanessa, M.D ; Marcellin, Louis, M.D., Ph.D ; Prunet, Caroline ; de Ziegler, Dominique, M.D ; Chapron, Charles, M.D</creatorcontrib><description>Objective To evaluate the impact of assisted reproduction technology (ART) on painful symptoms and quality of life (QoL) in women who have endometriosis as compared with disease-free women. Design Prospective controlled, observational cohort study. Setting University hospital. Patient(s) Two hundred and sixty-four matched-pairs of endometriosis and disease-free women undergoing ART. Intervention(s) Assessment of pain evolution using visual analogue scale (VAS) during ART; QoL assessment with the Fertility Quality of Life (FertiQoL) tool. Main Outcome Measure(s) VAS pain intensities relative to dysmenorrhea, dyspareunia, noncyclic chronic pelvic pain (NCCPP), gastrointestinal pain, lower urinary tract pain; trends for VAS change between postretrieval and baseline evaluation; FertiQoL score; and statistical analyses conducted using univariate and adjusted multiple linear regression models. Result(s) After excluding canceled cycles and patients lost to follow-up observation, 102 women with endometriosis and 104 disease-free women were retained for the study. The trends for VAS change between the postretrieval and baseline evaluations in the women with endometriosis compared with the disease-free women revealed a statistically significant pain decrease for dysmenorrhea (−1.35 ± 3.23 and 0.61 ± 4.00) and dyspareunia (−1.19 ± 2.58 and 0.14 ± 2.06). For NCCPP, gastrointestinal symptoms, and lower urinary tract symptoms, there were no statistically significant differences between the groups. After multiple linear regression, no worsening of pain was observed in the endometriosis group as compared with disease-free group. In addition subgroup analysis according to endometriosis phenotype failed to show any increase of pain. The quality of life in the endometriosis group was comparable to that of the disease-free group. Conclusion(s) Assisted reproduction technology did not exacerbate the symptoms of endometriosis or negatively impact QoL in women with endometriosis as compared with disease-free women.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0015-0282</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1556-5653</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2015.12.006</identifier><identifier>PMID: 26746132</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Adult ; Cohort Studies ; Endometriosis ; Endometriosis - diagnosis ; Endometriosis - epidemiology ; Endometriosis - psychology ; Female ; Follow-Up Studies ; Humans ; Infertility, Female - diagnosis ; Infertility, Female - epidemiology ; Infertility, Female - psychology ; Internal Medicine ; IVF ; Obstetrics and Gynecology ; pain ; Pain Measurement - psychology ; Pain Measurement - trends ; Pelvic Pain - diagnosis ; Pelvic Pain - epidemiology ; Prospective Studies ; quality of life ; Quality of Life - psychology ; Reproductive Techniques, Assisted - psychology ; Reproductive Techniques, Assisted - trends</subject><ispartof>Fertility and sterility, 2016-04, Vol.105 (4), p.978-987.e4</ispartof><rights>American Society for Reproductive Medicine</rights><rights>2016 American Society for Reproductive Medicine</rights><rights>Copyright © 2016 American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c479t-490bcb8c71919c8b18b4fee85fec429cfa61bdf2a6e22d5a4216f3c529cbfcd93</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c479t-490bcb8c71919c8b18b4fee85fec429cfa61bdf2a6e22d5a4216f3c529cbfcd93</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2015.12.006$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,3538,27906,27907,45977</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26746132$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Santulli, Pietro, M.D., Ph.D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bourdon, Mathilde</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Presse, Marion</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gayet, Vanessa, M.D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Marcellin, Louis, M.D., Ph.D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Prunet, Caroline</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Ziegler, Dominique, M.D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chapron, Charles, M.D</creatorcontrib><title>Endometriosis-related infertility: assisted reproductive technology has no adverse impact on pain or quality-of-life scores</title><title>Fertility and sterility</title><addtitle>Fertil Steril</addtitle><description>Objective To evaluate the impact of assisted reproduction technology (ART) on painful symptoms and quality of life (QoL) in women who have endometriosis as compared with disease-free women. Design Prospective controlled, observational cohort study. Setting University hospital. Patient(s) Two hundred and sixty-four matched-pairs of endometriosis and disease-free women undergoing ART. Intervention(s) Assessment of pain evolution using visual analogue scale (VAS) during ART; QoL assessment with the Fertility Quality of Life (FertiQoL) tool. Main Outcome Measure(s) VAS pain intensities relative to dysmenorrhea, dyspareunia, noncyclic chronic pelvic pain (NCCPP), gastrointestinal pain, lower urinary tract pain; trends for VAS change between postretrieval and baseline evaluation; FertiQoL score; and statistical analyses conducted using univariate and adjusted multiple linear regression models. Result(s) After excluding canceled cycles and patients lost to follow-up observation, 102 women with endometriosis and 104 disease-free women were retained for the study. The trends for VAS change between the postretrieval and baseline evaluations in the women with endometriosis compared with the disease-free women revealed a statistically significant pain decrease for dysmenorrhea (−1.35 ± 3.23 and 0.61 ± 4.00) and dyspareunia (−1.19 ± 2.58 and 0.14 ± 2.06). For NCCPP, gastrointestinal symptoms, and lower urinary tract symptoms, there were no statistically significant differences between the groups. After multiple linear regression, no worsening of pain was observed in the endometriosis group as compared with disease-free group. In addition subgroup analysis according to endometriosis phenotype failed to show any increase of pain. The quality of life in the endometriosis group was comparable to that of the disease-free group. Conclusion(s) Assisted reproduction technology did not exacerbate the symptoms of endometriosis or negatively impact QoL in women with endometriosis as compared with disease-free women.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Cohort Studies</subject><subject>Endometriosis</subject><subject>Endometriosis - diagnosis</subject><subject>Endometriosis - epidemiology</subject><subject>Endometriosis - psychology</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Follow-Up Studies</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Infertility, Female - diagnosis</subject><subject>Infertility, Female - epidemiology</subject><subject>Infertility, Female - psychology</subject><subject>Internal Medicine</subject><subject>IVF</subject><subject>Obstetrics and Gynecology</subject><subject>pain</subject><subject>Pain Measurement - psychology</subject><subject>Pain Measurement - trends</subject><subject>Pelvic Pain - diagnosis</subject><subject>Pelvic Pain - epidemiology</subject><subject>Prospective Studies</subject><subject>quality of life</subject><subject>Quality of Life - psychology</subject><subject>Reproductive Techniques, Assisted - psychology</subject><subject>Reproductive Techniques, Assisted - trends</subject><issn>0015-0282</issn><issn>1556-5653</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqNUs1uFSEUJkZjb6uvYFi6mSkwAzPjwkSb-pM06UJdEwYOlusM3AJzk5v0YXyWPlmZ3KqJq24OCd8ffDkIYUpqSqg439YWYvYpl1kzQnlNWU2IeIY2lHNRccGb52hDClIR1rMTdJrSlhQG7dhLdMJE1wrasA26u_QmzJCjC8mlKsKkMhjs_BrgJpcP77BKBVpvI-xiMIvObg84g77xYQo_D_hGpfvfPmBl9hATYDfvlM44eLxTzuMQ8e2iVq8q2GpyFnDSIUJ6hV5YNSV4_XieoR-fLr9ffKmurj9_vfhwVem2G3LVDmTUY687OtBB9yPtx9YC9NyCbtmgrRJ0NJYpAYwZrlpGhW00L9BotRmaM_T26Fuef7tAynJ2ScM0KQ9hSZJ2Xd-RQfSsUPsjVceQUgQrd9HNKh4kJXLtXm7lv-7l2r2kTJZmi_TNY8oyzmD-Cv-UXQgfjwQof907iDJpB16DcRF0lia4p6S8_89ET847raZfcIC0DUv0pUtJZSoC-W3dgXUF1kk7zpsHLR-08g</recordid><startdate>20160401</startdate><enddate>20160401</enddate><creator>Santulli, Pietro, M.D., Ph.D</creator><creator>Bourdon, Mathilde</creator><creator>Presse, Marion</creator><creator>Gayet, Vanessa, M.D</creator><creator>Marcellin, Louis, M.D., Ph.D</creator><creator>Prunet, Caroline</creator><creator>de Ziegler, Dominique, M.D</creator><creator>Chapron, Charles, M.D</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20160401</creationdate><title>Endometriosis-related infertility: assisted reproductive technology has no adverse impact on pain or quality-of-life scores</title><author>Santulli, Pietro, M.D., Ph.D ; Bourdon, Mathilde ; Presse, Marion ; Gayet, Vanessa, M.D ; Marcellin, Louis, M.D., Ph.D ; Prunet, Caroline ; de Ziegler, Dominique, M.D ; Chapron, Charles, M.D</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c479t-490bcb8c71919c8b18b4fee85fec429cfa61bdf2a6e22d5a4216f3c529cbfcd93</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Cohort Studies</topic><topic>Endometriosis</topic><topic>Endometriosis - diagnosis</topic><topic>Endometriosis - epidemiology</topic><topic>Endometriosis - psychology</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Follow-Up Studies</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Infertility, Female - diagnosis</topic><topic>Infertility, Female - epidemiology</topic><topic>Infertility, Female - psychology</topic><topic>Internal Medicine</topic><topic>IVF</topic><topic>Obstetrics and Gynecology</topic><topic>pain</topic><topic>Pain Measurement - psychology</topic><topic>Pain Measurement - trends</topic><topic>Pelvic Pain - diagnosis</topic><topic>Pelvic Pain - epidemiology</topic><topic>Prospective Studies</topic><topic>quality of life</topic><topic>Quality of Life - psychology</topic><topic>Reproductive Techniques, Assisted - psychology</topic><topic>Reproductive Techniques, Assisted - trends</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Santulli, Pietro, M.D., Ph.D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bourdon, Mathilde</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Presse, Marion</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gayet, Vanessa, M.D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Marcellin, Louis, M.D., Ph.D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Prunet, Caroline</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Ziegler, Dominique, M.D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chapron, Charles, M.D</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Fertility and sterility</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Santulli, Pietro, M.D., Ph.D</au><au>Bourdon, Mathilde</au><au>Presse, Marion</au><au>Gayet, Vanessa, M.D</au><au>Marcellin, Louis, M.D., Ph.D</au><au>Prunet, Caroline</au><au>de Ziegler, Dominique, M.D</au><au>Chapron, Charles, M.D</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Endometriosis-related infertility: assisted reproductive technology has no adverse impact on pain or quality-of-life scores</atitle><jtitle>Fertility and sterility</jtitle><addtitle>Fertil Steril</addtitle><date>2016-04-01</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>105</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>978</spage><epage>987.e4</epage><pages>978-987.e4</pages><issn>0015-0282</issn><eissn>1556-5653</eissn><abstract>Objective To evaluate the impact of assisted reproduction technology (ART) on painful symptoms and quality of life (QoL) in women who have endometriosis as compared with disease-free women. Design Prospective controlled, observational cohort study. Setting University hospital. Patient(s) Two hundred and sixty-four matched-pairs of endometriosis and disease-free women undergoing ART. Intervention(s) Assessment of pain evolution using visual analogue scale (VAS) during ART; QoL assessment with the Fertility Quality of Life (FertiQoL) tool. Main Outcome Measure(s) VAS pain intensities relative to dysmenorrhea, dyspareunia, noncyclic chronic pelvic pain (NCCPP), gastrointestinal pain, lower urinary tract pain; trends for VAS change between postretrieval and baseline evaluation; FertiQoL score; and statistical analyses conducted using univariate and adjusted multiple linear regression models. Result(s) After excluding canceled cycles and patients lost to follow-up observation, 102 women with endometriosis and 104 disease-free women were retained for the study. The trends for VAS change between the postretrieval and baseline evaluations in the women with endometriosis compared with the disease-free women revealed a statistically significant pain decrease for dysmenorrhea (−1.35 ± 3.23 and 0.61 ± 4.00) and dyspareunia (−1.19 ± 2.58 and 0.14 ± 2.06). For NCCPP, gastrointestinal symptoms, and lower urinary tract symptoms, there were no statistically significant differences between the groups. After multiple linear regression, no worsening of pain was observed in the endometriosis group as compared with disease-free group. In addition subgroup analysis according to endometriosis phenotype failed to show any increase of pain. The quality of life in the endometriosis group was comparable to that of the disease-free group. Conclusion(s) Assisted reproduction technology did not exacerbate the symptoms of endometriosis or negatively impact QoL in women with endometriosis as compared with disease-free women.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>26746132</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.fertnstert.2015.12.006</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0015-0282 |
ispartof | Fertility and sterility, 2016-04, Vol.105 (4), p.978-987.e4 |
issn | 0015-0282 1556-5653 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1778709682 |
source | MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; Alma/SFX Local Collection |
subjects | Adult Cohort Studies Endometriosis Endometriosis - diagnosis Endometriosis - epidemiology Endometriosis - psychology Female Follow-Up Studies Humans Infertility, Female - diagnosis Infertility, Female - epidemiology Infertility, Female - psychology Internal Medicine IVF Obstetrics and Gynecology pain Pain Measurement - psychology Pain Measurement - trends Pelvic Pain - diagnosis Pelvic Pain - epidemiology Prospective Studies quality of life Quality of Life - psychology Reproductive Techniques, Assisted - psychology Reproductive Techniques, Assisted - trends |
title | Endometriosis-related infertility: assisted reproductive technology has no adverse impact on pain or quality-of-life scores |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-17T09%3A03%3A52IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Endometriosis-related%20infertility:%20assisted%20reproductive%20technology%20has%C2%A0no%20adverse%20impact%20on%20pain%20or%20quality-of-life%20scores&rft.jtitle=Fertility%20and%20sterility&rft.au=Santulli,%20Pietro,%20M.D.,%20Ph.D&rft.date=2016-04-01&rft.volume=105&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=978&rft.epage=987.e4&rft.pages=978-987.e4&rft.issn=0015-0282&rft.eissn=1556-5653&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2015.12.006&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1778709682%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1778709682&rft_id=info:pmid/26746132&rft_els_id=1_s2_0_S0015028215021755&rfr_iscdi=true |