Endometriosis-related infertility: assisted reproductive technology has no adverse impact on pain or quality-of-life scores

Objective To evaluate the impact of assisted reproduction technology (ART) on painful symptoms and quality of life (QoL) in women who have endometriosis as compared with disease-free women. Design Prospective controlled, observational cohort study. Setting University hospital. Patient(s) Two hundred...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Fertility and sterility 2016-04, Vol.105 (4), p.978-987.e4
Hauptverfasser: Santulli, Pietro, M.D., Ph.D, Bourdon, Mathilde, Presse, Marion, Gayet, Vanessa, M.D, Marcellin, Louis, M.D., Ph.D, Prunet, Caroline, de Ziegler, Dominique, M.D, Chapron, Charles, M.D
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 987.e4
container_issue 4
container_start_page 978
container_title Fertility and sterility
container_volume 105
creator Santulli, Pietro, M.D., Ph.D
Bourdon, Mathilde
Presse, Marion
Gayet, Vanessa, M.D
Marcellin, Louis, M.D., Ph.D
Prunet, Caroline
de Ziegler, Dominique, M.D
Chapron, Charles, M.D
description Objective To evaluate the impact of assisted reproduction technology (ART) on painful symptoms and quality of life (QoL) in women who have endometriosis as compared with disease-free women. Design Prospective controlled, observational cohort study. Setting University hospital. Patient(s) Two hundred and sixty-four matched-pairs of endometriosis and disease-free women undergoing ART. Intervention(s) Assessment of pain evolution using visual analogue scale (VAS) during ART; QoL assessment with the Fertility Quality of Life (FertiQoL) tool. Main Outcome Measure(s) VAS pain intensities relative to dysmenorrhea, dyspareunia, noncyclic chronic pelvic pain (NCCPP), gastrointestinal pain, lower urinary tract pain; trends for VAS change between postretrieval and baseline evaluation; FertiQoL score; and statistical analyses conducted using univariate and adjusted multiple linear regression models. Result(s) After excluding canceled cycles and patients lost to follow-up observation, 102 women with endometriosis and 104 disease-free women were retained for the study. The trends for VAS change between the postretrieval and baseline evaluations in the women with endometriosis compared with the disease-free women revealed a statistically significant pain decrease for dysmenorrhea (−1.35 ± 3.23 and 0.61 ± 4.00) and dyspareunia (−1.19 ± 2.58 and 0.14 ± 2.06). For NCCPP, gastrointestinal symptoms, and lower urinary tract symptoms, there were no statistically significant differences between the groups. After multiple linear regression, no worsening of pain was observed in the endometriosis group as compared with disease-free group. In addition subgroup analysis according to endometriosis phenotype failed to show any increase of pain. The quality of life in the endometriosis group was comparable to that of the disease-free group. Conclusion(s) Assisted reproduction technology did not exacerbate the symptoms of endometriosis or negatively impact QoL in women with endometriosis as compared with disease-free women.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2015.12.006
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1778709682</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>1_s2_0_S0015028215021755</els_id><sourcerecordid>1778709682</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c479t-490bcb8c71919c8b18b4fee85fec429cfa61bdf2a6e22d5a4216f3c529cbfcd93</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNUs1uFSEUJkZjb6uvYFi6mSkwAzPjwkSb-pM06UJdEwYOlusM3AJzk5v0YXyWPlmZ3KqJq24OCd8ffDkIYUpqSqg439YWYvYpl1kzQnlNWU2IeIY2lHNRccGb52hDClIR1rMTdJrSlhQG7dhLdMJE1wrasA26u_QmzJCjC8mlKsKkMhjs_BrgJpcP77BKBVpvI-xiMIvObg84g77xYQo_D_hGpfvfPmBl9hATYDfvlM44eLxTzuMQ8e2iVq8q2GpyFnDSIUJ6hV5YNSV4_XieoR-fLr9ffKmurj9_vfhwVem2G3LVDmTUY687OtBB9yPtx9YC9NyCbtmgrRJ0NJYpAYwZrlpGhW00L9BotRmaM_T26Fuef7tAynJ2ScM0KQ9hSZJ2Xd-RQfSsUPsjVceQUgQrd9HNKh4kJXLtXm7lv-7l2r2kTJZmi_TNY8oyzmD-Cv-UXQgfjwQof907iDJpB16DcRF0lia4p6S8_89ET847raZfcIC0DUv0pUtJZSoC-W3dgXUF1kk7zpsHLR-08g</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1778709682</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Endometriosis-related infertility: assisted reproductive technology has no adverse impact on pain or quality-of-life scores</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Santulli, Pietro, M.D., Ph.D ; Bourdon, Mathilde ; Presse, Marion ; Gayet, Vanessa, M.D ; Marcellin, Louis, M.D., Ph.D ; Prunet, Caroline ; de Ziegler, Dominique, M.D ; Chapron, Charles, M.D</creator><creatorcontrib>Santulli, Pietro, M.D., Ph.D ; Bourdon, Mathilde ; Presse, Marion ; Gayet, Vanessa, M.D ; Marcellin, Louis, M.D., Ph.D ; Prunet, Caroline ; de Ziegler, Dominique, M.D ; Chapron, Charles, M.D</creatorcontrib><description>Objective To evaluate the impact of assisted reproduction technology (ART) on painful symptoms and quality of life (QoL) in women who have endometriosis as compared with disease-free women. Design Prospective controlled, observational cohort study. Setting University hospital. Patient(s) Two hundred and sixty-four matched-pairs of endometriosis and disease-free women undergoing ART. Intervention(s) Assessment of pain evolution using visual analogue scale (VAS) during ART; QoL assessment with the Fertility Quality of Life (FertiQoL) tool. Main Outcome Measure(s) VAS pain intensities relative to dysmenorrhea, dyspareunia, noncyclic chronic pelvic pain (NCCPP), gastrointestinal pain, lower urinary tract pain; trends for VAS change between postretrieval and baseline evaluation; FertiQoL score; and statistical analyses conducted using univariate and adjusted multiple linear regression models. Result(s) After excluding canceled cycles and patients lost to follow-up observation, 102 women with endometriosis and 104 disease-free women were retained for the study. The trends for VAS change between the postretrieval and baseline evaluations in the women with endometriosis compared with the disease-free women revealed a statistically significant pain decrease for dysmenorrhea (−1.35 ± 3.23 and 0.61 ± 4.00) and dyspareunia (−1.19 ± 2.58 and 0.14 ± 2.06). For NCCPP, gastrointestinal symptoms, and lower urinary tract symptoms, there were no statistically significant differences between the groups. After multiple linear regression, no worsening of pain was observed in the endometriosis group as compared with disease-free group. In addition subgroup analysis according to endometriosis phenotype failed to show any increase of pain. The quality of life in the endometriosis group was comparable to that of the disease-free group. Conclusion(s) Assisted reproduction technology did not exacerbate the symptoms of endometriosis or negatively impact QoL in women with endometriosis as compared with disease-free women.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0015-0282</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1556-5653</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2015.12.006</identifier><identifier>PMID: 26746132</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Adult ; Cohort Studies ; Endometriosis ; Endometriosis - diagnosis ; Endometriosis - epidemiology ; Endometriosis - psychology ; Female ; Follow-Up Studies ; Humans ; Infertility, Female - diagnosis ; Infertility, Female - epidemiology ; Infertility, Female - psychology ; Internal Medicine ; IVF ; Obstetrics and Gynecology ; pain ; Pain Measurement - psychology ; Pain Measurement - trends ; Pelvic Pain - diagnosis ; Pelvic Pain - epidemiology ; Prospective Studies ; quality of life ; Quality of Life - psychology ; Reproductive Techniques, Assisted - psychology ; Reproductive Techniques, Assisted - trends</subject><ispartof>Fertility and sterility, 2016-04, Vol.105 (4), p.978-987.e4</ispartof><rights>American Society for Reproductive Medicine</rights><rights>2016 American Society for Reproductive Medicine</rights><rights>Copyright © 2016 American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c479t-490bcb8c71919c8b18b4fee85fec429cfa61bdf2a6e22d5a4216f3c529cbfcd93</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c479t-490bcb8c71919c8b18b4fee85fec429cfa61bdf2a6e22d5a4216f3c529cbfcd93</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2015.12.006$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,3538,27906,27907,45977</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26746132$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Santulli, Pietro, M.D., Ph.D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bourdon, Mathilde</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Presse, Marion</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gayet, Vanessa, M.D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Marcellin, Louis, M.D., Ph.D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Prunet, Caroline</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Ziegler, Dominique, M.D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chapron, Charles, M.D</creatorcontrib><title>Endometriosis-related infertility: assisted reproductive technology has no adverse impact on pain or quality-of-life scores</title><title>Fertility and sterility</title><addtitle>Fertil Steril</addtitle><description>Objective To evaluate the impact of assisted reproduction technology (ART) on painful symptoms and quality of life (QoL) in women who have endometriosis as compared with disease-free women. Design Prospective controlled, observational cohort study. Setting University hospital. Patient(s) Two hundred and sixty-four matched-pairs of endometriosis and disease-free women undergoing ART. Intervention(s) Assessment of pain evolution using visual analogue scale (VAS) during ART; QoL assessment with the Fertility Quality of Life (FertiQoL) tool. Main Outcome Measure(s) VAS pain intensities relative to dysmenorrhea, dyspareunia, noncyclic chronic pelvic pain (NCCPP), gastrointestinal pain, lower urinary tract pain; trends for VAS change between postretrieval and baseline evaluation; FertiQoL score; and statistical analyses conducted using univariate and adjusted multiple linear regression models. Result(s) After excluding canceled cycles and patients lost to follow-up observation, 102 women with endometriosis and 104 disease-free women were retained for the study. The trends for VAS change between the postretrieval and baseline evaluations in the women with endometriosis compared with the disease-free women revealed a statistically significant pain decrease for dysmenorrhea (−1.35 ± 3.23 and 0.61 ± 4.00) and dyspareunia (−1.19 ± 2.58 and 0.14 ± 2.06). For NCCPP, gastrointestinal symptoms, and lower urinary tract symptoms, there were no statistically significant differences between the groups. After multiple linear regression, no worsening of pain was observed in the endometriosis group as compared with disease-free group. In addition subgroup analysis according to endometriosis phenotype failed to show any increase of pain. The quality of life in the endometriosis group was comparable to that of the disease-free group. Conclusion(s) Assisted reproduction technology did not exacerbate the symptoms of endometriosis or negatively impact QoL in women with endometriosis as compared with disease-free women.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Cohort Studies</subject><subject>Endometriosis</subject><subject>Endometriosis - diagnosis</subject><subject>Endometriosis - epidemiology</subject><subject>Endometriosis - psychology</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Follow-Up Studies</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Infertility, Female - diagnosis</subject><subject>Infertility, Female - epidemiology</subject><subject>Infertility, Female - psychology</subject><subject>Internal Medicine</subject><subject>IVF</subject><subject>Obstetrics and Gynecology</subject><subject>pain</subject><subject>Pain Measurement - psychology</subject><subject>Pain Measurement - trends</subject><subject>Pelvic Pain - diagnosis</subject><subject>Pelvic Pain - epidemiology</subject><subject>Prospective Studies</subject><subject>quality of life</subject><subject>Quality of Life - psychology</subject><subject>Reproductive Techniques, Assisted - psychology</subject><subject>Reproductive Techniques, Assisted - trends</subject><issn>0015-0282</issn><issn>1556-5653</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqNUs1uFSEUJkZjb6uvYFi6mSkwAzPjwkSb-pM06UJdEwYOlusM3AJzk5v0YXyWPlmZ3KqJq24OCd8ffDkIYUpqSqg439YWYvYpl1kzQnlNWU2IeIY2lHNRccGb52hDClIR1rMTdJrSlhQG7dhLdMJE1wrasA26u_QmzJCjC8mlKsKkMhjs_BrgJpcP77BKBVpvI-xiMIvObg84g77xYQo_D_hGpfvfPmBl9hATYDfvlM44eLxTzuMQ8e2iVq8q2GpyFnDSIUJ6hV5YNSV4_XieoR-fLr9ffKmurj9_vfhwVem2G3LVDmTUY687OtBB9yPtx9YC9NyCbtmgrRJ0NJYpAYwZrlpGhW00L9BotRmaM_T26Fuef7tAynJ2ScM0KQ9hSZJ2Xd-RQfSsUPsjVceQUgQrd9HNKh4kJXLtXm7lv-7l2r2kTJZmi_TNY8oyzmD-Cv-UXQgfjwQof907iDJpB16DcRF0lia4p6S8_89ET847raZfcIC0DUv0pUtJZSoC-W3dgXUF1kk7zpsHLR-08g</recordid><startdate>20160401</startdate><enddate>20160401</enddate><creator>Santulli, Pietro, M.D., Ph.D</creator><creator>Bourdon, Mathilde</creator><creator>Presse, Marion</creator><creator>Gayet, Vanessa, M.D</creator><creator>Marcellin, Louis, M.D., Ph.D</creator><creator>Prunet, Caroline</creator><creator>de Ziegler, Dominique, M.D</creator><creator>Chapron, Charles, M.D</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20160401</creationdate><title>Endometriosis-related infertility: assisted reproductive technology has no adverse impact on pain or quality-of-life scores</title><author>Santulli, Pietro, M.D., Ph.D ; Bourdon, Mathilde ; Presse, Marion ; Gayet, Vanessa, M.D ; Marcellin, Louis, M.D., Ph.D ; Prunet, Caroline ; de Ziegler, Dominique, M.D ; Chapron, Charles, M.D</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c479t-490bcb8c71919c8b18b4fee85fec429cfa61bdf2a6e22d5a4216f3c529cbfcd93</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Cohort Studies</topic><topic>Endometriosis</topic><topic>Endometriosis - diagnosis</topic><topic>Endometriosis - epidemiology</topic><topic>Endometriosis - psychology</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Follow-Up Studies</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Infertility, Female - diagnosis</topic><topic>Infertility, Female - epidemiology</topic><topic>Infertility, Female - psychology</topic><topic>Internal Medicine</topic><topic>IVF</topic><topic>Obstetrics and Gynecology</topic><topic>pain</topic><topic>Pain Measurement - psychology</topic><topic>Pain Measurement - trends</topic><topic>Pelvic Pain - diagnosis</topic><topic>Pelvic Pain - epidemiology</topic><topic>Prospective Studies</topic><topic>quality of life</topic><topic>Quality of Life - psychology</topic><topic>Reproductive Techniques, Assisted - psychology</topic><topic>Reproductive Techniques, Assisted - trends</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Santulli, Pietro, M.D., Ph.D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bourdon, Mathilde</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Presse, Marion</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gayet, Vanessa, M.D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Marcellin, Louis, M.D., Ph.D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Prunet, Caroline</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Ziegler, Dominique, M.D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chapron, Charles, M.D</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Fertility and sterility</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Santulli, Pietro, M.D., Ph.D</au><au>Bourdon, Mathilde</au><au>Presse, Marion</au><au>Gayet, Vanessa, M.D</au><au>Marcellin, Louis, M.D., Ph.D</au><au>Prunet, Caroline</au><au>de Ziegler, Dominique, M.D</au><au>Chapron, Charles, M.D</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Endometriosis-related infertility: assisted reproductive technology has no adverse impact on pain or quality-of-life scores</atitle><jtitle>Fertility and sterility</jtitle><addtitle>Fertil Steril</addtitle><date>2016-04-01</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>105</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>978</spage><epage>987.e4</epage><pages>978-987.e4</pages><issn>0015-0282</issn><eissn>1556-5653</eissn><abstract>Objective To evaluate the impact of assisted reproduction technology (ART) on painful symptoms and quality of life (QoL) in women who have endometriosis as compared with disease-free women. Design Prospective controlled, observational cohort study. Setting University hospital. Patient(s) Two hundred and sixty-four matched-pairs of endometriosis and disease-free women undergoing ART. Intervention(s) Assessment of pain evolution using visual analogue scale (VAS) during ART; QoL assessment with the Fertility Quality of Life (FertiQoL) tool. Main Outcome Measure(s) VAS pain intensities relative to dysmenorrhea, dyspareunia, noncyclic chronic pelvic pain (NCCPP), gastrointestinal pain, lower urinary tract pain; trends for VAS change between postretrieval and baseline evaluation; FertiQoL score; and statistical analyses conducted using univariate and adjusted multiple linear regression models. Result(s) After excluding canceled cycles and patients lost to follow-up observation, 102 women with endometriosis and 104 disease-free women were retained for the study. The trends for VAS change between the postretrieval and baseline evaluations in the women with endometriosis compared with the disease-free women revealed a statistically significant pain decrease for dysmenorrhea (−1.35 ± 3.23 and 0.61 ± 4.00) and dyspareunia (−1.19 ± 2.58 and 0.14 ± 2.06). For NCCPP, gastrointestinal symptoms, and lower urinary tract symptoms, there were no statistically significant differences between the groups. After multiple linear regression, no worsening of pain was observed in the endometriosis group as compared with disease-free group. In addition subgroup analysis according to endometriosis phenotype failed to show any increase of pain. The quality of life in the endometriosis group was comparable to that of the disease-free group. Conclusion(s) Assisted reproduction technology did not exacerbate the symptoms of endometriosis or negatively impact QoL in women with endometriosis as compared with disease-free women.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>26746132</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.fertnstert.2015.12.006</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0015-0282
ispartof Fertility and sterility, 2016-04, Vol.105 (4), p.978-987.e4
issn 0015-0282
1556-5653
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1778709682
source MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Adult
Cohort Studies
Endometriosis
Endometriosis - diagnosis
Endometriosis - epidemiology
Endometriosis - psychology
Female
Follow-Up Studies
Humans
Infertility, Female - diagnosis
Infertility, Female - epidemiology
Infertility, Female - psychology
Internal Medicine
IVF
Obstetrics and Gynecology
pain
Pain Measurement - psychology
Pain Measurement - trends
Pelvic Pain - diagnosis
Pelvic Pain - epidemiology
Prospective Studies
quality of life
Quality of Life - psychology
Reproductive Techniques, Assisted - psychology
Reproductive Techniques, Assisted - trends
title Endometriosis-related infertility: assisted reproductive technology has no adverse impact on pain or quality-of-life scores
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-17T09%3A03%3A52IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Endometriosis-related%20infertility:%20assisted%20reproductive%20technology%20has%C2%A0no%20adverse%20impact%20on%20pain%20or%20quality-of-life%20scores&rft.jtitle=Fertility%20and%20sterility&rft.au=Santulli,%20Pietro,%20M.D.,%20Ph.D&rft.date=2016-04-01&rft.volume=105&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=978&rft.epage=987.e4&rft.pages=978-987.e4&rft.issn=0015-0282&rft.eissn=1556-5653&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2015.12.006&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1778709682%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1778709682&rft_id=info:pmid/26746132&rft_els_id=1_s2_0_S0015028215021755&rfr_iscdi=true