Time–frequency analysis of VLF for seismic-ionospheric precursor detection: Evaluation of Zhao-Atlas-Marks and Hilbert-Huang Transforms

•VLF and LF stations have been monitored in a receiver in Thessaloniki, Greece (INFREP).•Study of comparison between 2 methods of processing the data.•Hilbert-Huang Transform and Zhao-Atlas-Marks Distribution and Continuous Wavelet Transform.•Advantages and weaknesses of each method are discussed. T...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Physics and chemistry of the earth. Parts A/B/C 2015-01, Vol.85-86, p.174-184
Hauptverfasser: Skeberis, C., Zaharis, Z.D., Xenos, T.D., Spatalas, S., Arabelos, D.N., Contadakis, M.E.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 184
container_issue
container_start_page 174
container_title Physics and chemistry of the earth. Parts A/B/C
container_volume 85-86
creator Skeberis, C.
Zaharis, Z.D.
Xenos, T.D.
Spatalas, S.
Arabelos, D.N.
Contadakis, M.E.
description •VLF and LF stations have been monitored in a receiver in Thessaloniki, Greece (INFREP).•Study of comparison between 2 methods of processing the data.•Hilbert-Huang Transform and Zhao-Atlas-Marks Distribution and Continuous Wavelet Transform.•Advantages and weaknesses of each method are discussed. This work investigates the application of two post-processing methods of extracting spectra from VLF signals in order to detect disturbances that could be attributed to seismic-ionospheric precursory phenomena. Although precursory phenomena have been investigated in detail in past studies, a different application of time–frequency analysis methods may produce distinct patterns, which reveal disturbances in the VLF spectra received from stations that are in the propagation path over preparation zones, and also pinpoint disturbances that could be attributed to seismic-ionospheric precursors. To this purpose, three different methods of post processing are compared. These are the Wavelet Transform as a benchmark method in the form of the Continuous Wavelet Transform, a noise-assisted variant of the Hilbert-Huang Transform and the Zhao-Atlas-Marks Distribution. Comparative diagrams are presented and the advantages and weaknesses of each method are presented.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.pce.2015.02.006
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1778040766</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S1474706515000170</els_id><sourcerecordid>1778040766</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a423t-a666b3c7ff6daa28d7f9b1d51ff94bc6d4b1ce791992799c422091ef64ea70213</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kDFvFDEQhVeISISEH0DnksaL7fXZZ6iiKMlFOkRzoaCxvN4x8bG7Xjy7ka6jTc0_5Jfg06WmmifNe280X1W956zmjKuP-3ryUAvGVzUTNWPqVXXO17qhK26a10VLLalmavWmeou4Z4xrLuV59byLA_z9_Sdk-LXA6A_Eja4_YESSAvm2vSUhZYIQcYiexjQmnB4hR0-mDH7JWLYdzODnsvtEbp5cv7ijPsa_P7pEr-beIf3i8k8s3R3ZxL6FPNPN4sYfZJfdiOXEgJfVWXA9wruXeVE93N7srjd0-_Xu_vpqS50UzUydUqptvA5Bdc6JdaeDaXm34iEY2XrVyZZ70IYbI7QxXgrBDIegJDjNBG8uqg-n3imn8jLOdojooe_dCGlBy7VeM8m0UsXKT1afE2KGYKccB5cPljN7xG73tmC3R-yWCVuwl8znUwbKD08RskUfC1joYgE22y7F_6T_ATv1jl8</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1778040766</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Time–frequency analysis of VLF for seismic-ionospheric precursor detection: Evaluation of Zhao-Atlas-Marks and Hilbert-Huang Transforms</title><source>Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)</source><creator>Skeberis, C. ; Zaharis, Z.D. ; Xenos, T.D. ; Spatalas, S. ; Arabelos, D.N. ; Contadakis, M.E.</creator><creatorcontrib>Skeberis, C. ; Zaharis, Z.D. ; Xenos, T.D. ; Spatalas, S. ; Arabelos, D.N. ; Contadakis, M.E.</creatorcontrib><description>•VLF and LF stations have been monitored in a receiver in Thessaloniki, Greece (INFREP).•Study of comparison between 2 methods of processing the data.•Hilbert-Huang Transform and Zhao-Atlas-Marks Distribution and Continuous Wavelet Transform.•Advantages and weaknesses of each method are discussed. This work investigates the application of two post-processing methods of extracting spectra from VLF signals in order to detect disturbances that could be attributed to seismic-ionospheric precursory phenomena. Although precursory phenomena have been investigated in detail in past studies, a different application of time–frequency analysis methods may produce distinct patterns, which reveal disturbances in the VLF spectra received from stations that are in the propagation path over preparation zones, and also pinpoint disturbances that could be attributed to seismic-ionospheric precursors. To this purpose, three different methods of post processing are compared. These are the Wavelet Transform as a benchmark method in the form of the Continuous Wavelet Transform, a noise-assisted variant of the Hilbert-Huang Transform and the Zhao-Atlas-Marks Distribution. Comparative diagrams are presented and the advantages and weaknesses of each method are presented.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1474-7065</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-5193</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.pce.2015.02.006</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Disturbances ; Earthquake precursors ; Hilbert-Huang Transform ; Precursors ; Production methods ; Seismic-ionospheric coupling ; Spectra ; Stations ; Time-frequency analysis ; Transforms ; VLF ; Zhao-Atlas-Marks</subject><ispartof>Physics and chemistry of the earth. Parts A/B/C, 2015-01, Vol.85-86, p.174-184</ispartof><rights>2015 Elsevier Ltd</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a423t-a666b3c7ff6daa28d7f9b1d51ff94bc6d4b1ce791992799c422091ef64ea70213</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a423t-a666b3c7ff6daa28d7f9b1d51ff94bc6d4b1ce791992799c422091ef64ea70213</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pce.2015.02.006$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>315,782,786,3554,27933,27934,46004</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Skeberis, C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zaharis, Z.D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xenos, T.D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Spatalas, S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Arabelos, D.N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Contadakis, M.E.</creatorcontrib><title>Time–frequency analysis of VLF for seismic-ionospheric precursor detection: Evaluation of Zhao-Atlas-Marks and Hilbert-Huang Transforms</title><title>Physics and chemistry of the earth. Parts A/B/C</title><description>•VLF and LF stations have been monitored in a receiver in Thessaloniki, Greece (INFREP).•Study of comparison between 2 methods of processing the data.•Hilbert-Huang Transform and Zhao-Atlas-Marks Distribution and Continuous Wavelet Transform.•Advantages and weaknesses of each method are discussed. This work investigates the application of two post-processing methods of extracting spectra from VLF signals in order to detect disturbances that could be attributed to seismic-ionospheric precursory phenomena. Although precursory phenomena have been investigated in detail in past studies, a different application of time–frequency analysis methods may produce distinct patterns, which reveal disturbances in the VLF spectra received from stations that are in the propagation path over preparation zones, and also pinpoint disturbances that could be attributed to seismic-ionospheric precursors. To this purpose, three different methods of post processing are compared. These are the Wavelet Transform as a benchmark method in the form of the Continuous Wavelet Transform, a noise-assisted variant of the Hilbert-Huang Transform and the Zhao-Atlas-Marks Distribution. Comparative diagrams are presented and the advantages and weaknesses of each method are presented.</description><subject>Disturbances</subject><subject>Earthquake precursors</subject><subject>Hilbert-Huang Transform</subject><subject>Precursors</subject><subject>Production methods</subject><subject>Seismic-ionospheric coupling</subject><subject>Spectra</subject><subject>Stations</subject><subject>Time-frequency analysis</subject><subject>Transforms</subject><subject>VLF</subject><subject>Zhao-Atlas-Marks</subject><issn>1474-7065</issn><issn>1873-5193</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kDFvFDEQhVeISISEH0DnksaL7fXZZ6iiKMlFOkRzoaCxvN4x8bG7Xjy7ka6jTc0_5Jfg06WmmifNe280X1W956zmjKuP-3ryUAvGVzUTNWPqVXXO17qhK26a10VLLalmavWmeou4Z4xrLuV59byLA_z9_Sdk-LXA6A_Eja4_YESSAvm2vSUhZYIQcYiexjQmnB4hR0-mDH7JWLYdzODnsvtEbp5cv7ijPsa_P7pEr-beIf3i8k8s3R3ZxL6FPNPN4sYfZJfdiOXEgJfVWXA9wruXeVE93N7srjd0-_Xu_vpqS50UzUydUqptvA5Bdc6JdaeDaXm34iEY2XrVyZZ70IYbI7QxXgrBDIegJDjNBG8uqg-n3imn8jLOdojooe_dCGlBy7VeM8m0UsXKT1afE2KGYKccB5cPljN7xG73tmC3R-yWCVuwl8znUwbKD08RskUfC1joYgE22y7F_6T_ATv1jl8</recordid><startdate>20150101</startdate><enddate>20150101</enddate><creator>Skeberis, C.</creator><creator>Zaharis, Z.D.</creator><creator>Xenos, T.D.</creator><creator>Spatalas, S.</creator><creator>Arabelos, D.N.</creator><creator>Contadakis, M.E.</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7U5</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>L7M</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20150101</creationdate><title>Time–frequency analysis of VLF for seismic-ionospheric precursor detection: Evaluation of Zhao-Atlas-Marks and Hilbert-Huang Transforms</title><author>Skeberis, C. ; Zaharis, Z.D. ; Xenos, T.D. ; Spatalas, S. ; Arabelos, D.N. ; Contadakis, M.E.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a423t-a666b3c7ff6daa28d7f9b1d51ff94bc6d4b1ce791992799c422091ef64ea70213</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Disturbances</topic><topic>Earthquake precursors</topic><topic>Hilbert-Huang Transform</topic><topic>Precursors</topic><topic>Production methods</topic><topic>Seismic-ionospheric coupling</topic><topic>Spectra</topic><topic>Stations</topic><topic>Time-frequency analysis</topic><topic>Transforms</topic><topic>VLF</topic><topic>Zhao-Atlas-Marks</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Skeberis, C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zaharis, Z.D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xenos, T.D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Spatalas, S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Arabelos, D.N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Contadakis, M.E.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Solid State and Superconductivity Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><jtitle>Physics and chemistry of the earth. Parts A/B/C</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Skeberis, C.</au><au>Zaharis, Z.D.</au><au>Xenos, T.D.</au><au>Spatalas, S.</au><au>Arabelos, D.N.</au><au>Contadakis, M.E.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Time–frequency analysis of VLF for seismic-ionospheric precursor detection: Evaluation of Zhao-Atlas-Marks and Hilbert-Huang Transforms</atitle><jtitle>Physics and chemistry of the earth. Parts A/B/C</jtitle><date>2015-01-01</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>85-86</volume><spage>174</spage><epage>184</epage><pages>174-184</pages><issn>1474-7065</issn><eissn>1873-5193</eissn><abstract>•VLF and LF stations have been monitored in a receiver in Thessaloniki, Greece (INFREP).•Study of comparison between 2 methods of processing the data.•Hilbert-Huang Transform and Zhao-Atlas-Marks Distribution and Continuous Wavelet Transform.•Advantages and weaknesses of each method are discussed. This work investigates the application of two post-processing methods of extracting spectra from VLF signals in order to detect disturbances that could be attributed to seismic-ionospheric precursory phenomena. Although precursory phenomena have been investigated in detail in past studies, a different application of time–frequency analysis methods may produce distinct patterns, which reveal disturbances in the VLF spectra received from stations that are in the propagation path over preparation zones, and also pinpoint disturbances that could be attributed to seismic-ionospheric precursors. To this purpose, three different methods of post processing are compared. These are the Wavelet Transform as a benchmark method in the form of the Continuous Wavelet Transform, a noise-assisted variant of the Hilbert-Huang Transform and the Zhao-Atlas-Marks Distribution. Comparative diagrams are presented and the advantages and weaknesses of each method are presented.</abstract><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><doi>10.1016/j.pce.2015.02.006</doi><tpages>11</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1474-7065
ispartof Physics and chemistry of the earth. Parts A/B/C, 2015-01, Vol.85-86, p.174-184
issn 1474-7065
1873-5193
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1778040766
source Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)
subjects Disturbances
Earthquake precursors
Hilbert-Huang Transform
Precursors
Production methods
Seismic-ionospheric coupling
Spectra
Stations
Time-frequency analysis
Transforms
VLF
Zhao-Atlas-Marks
title Time–frequency analysis of VLF for seismic-ionospheric precursor detection: Evaluation of Zhao-Atlas-Marks and Hilbert-Huang Transforms
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-02T16%3A00%3A29IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Time%E2%80%93frequency%20analysis%20of%20VLF%20for%20seismic-ionospheric%20precursor%20detection:%20Evaluation%20of%20Zhao-Atlas-Marks%20and%20Hilbert-Huang%20Transforms&rft.jtitle=Physics%20and%20chemistry%20of%20the%20earth.%20Parts%20A/B/C&rft.au=Skeberis,%20C.&rft.date=2015-01-01&rft.volume=85-86&rft.spage=174&rft.epage=184&rft.pages=174-184&rft.issn=1474-7065&rft.eissn=1873-5193&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.pce.2015.02.006&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1778040766%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1778040766&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S1474706515000170&rfr_iscdi=true