Chemometric approaches to data assessment for a long-term case study of MIEX pretreatment performance

A specifically designed pilot plant facility located at the Mount Pleasant Water Treatment Plant in South Australia was used to investigate the efficiencies of several drinking water treatment processes, including (1) magnetic ion exchange (MIEX) as a pretreatment followed by conventional coagulatio...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Desalination and water treatment 2013-04, Vol.51 (16-18), p.3639-3649
Hauptverfasser: Aslam, Zeeshan, Dixon, Mike, Chow, Christopher W.K., Morran, Jim, Drikas, Mary, van Leeuwen, John A.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 3649
container_issue 16-18
container_start_page 3639
container_title Desalination and water treatment
container_volume 51
creator Aslam, Zeeshan
Dixon, Mike
Chow, Christopher W.K.
Morran, Jim
Drikas, Mary
van Leeuwen, John A.
description A specifically designed pilot plant facility located at the Mount Pleasant Water Treatment Plant in South Australia was used to investigate the efficiencies of several drinking water treatment processes, including (1) magnetic ion exchange (MIEX) as a pretreatment followed by conventional coagulation treatment, (2) conventional coagulation at pilot the plant alone, (3) MIEX followed by microfiltration (MF), and (4) MF alone. Dissolved organic matter (DOM) removal efficiency of the treatment processes and more importantly the treated water quality was assessed using dissolved organic carbon (DOC) measurement and together with the changes in the chromophoric organics character based on their molecular weight profiles determined by high-performance size exclusion chromatography (HPSEC) were also reported. Cluster analyses (CAs) were performed using the HPSEC peak area (after separated by peak fitting), and supported by DOC, UV absorbance at 254 nm, and SUVA in order to compare treatment efficiencies of these technologies. It was a novel way of applying CA as a data mining tool to interpret and assess DOM removal results. From the results of these CA, it was found that the MIEX process provided consistent treatment performance and highest removal of DOM, as well as removal of a broad range of molecular weight organics. In comparison coagulation with alum tended to remove the high molecular weight (>1000 Da) compounds. This statistical approach provided improved understanding of the performances of the treatment processes, investigated at a molecular level, for the removal of DOM.
doi_str_mv 10.1080/19443994.2012.751149
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1778039543</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S1944398624187358</els_id><sourcerecordid>1372060766</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c402t-a2b58d09841ab85912e6be497eefe1252b38a779ad22578969454e6070c32fca3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkU9r3DAQxU1poSHZb5CDLoFevNVfy7oEwpK2Cwm9JNCbmJXHXRd75Wq0gXz7arNpyCnRRUL83hvmvao6F3wpeMu_Cqe1ck4vJRdyaY0Q2n2oTg7ftXJt8_HV-3O1IPrDyzHaGi1PKlxtcYoT5jQEBvOcIoQtEsuRdZCBARESTbjLrI-JARvj7nedMU0sACGjvO8eWezZ7fr6F5tTMULIT_yMqUgm2AU8qz71MBIunu_T6v7b9d3qR33z8_t6dXVTB81lrkFuTNtx12oBm9Y4IbHZoHYWsUchjdyoFqx10ElpbOsap43GhlselOwDqNPqy9G37PF3j5T9NFDAcYQdxj15YW3LlTNavY8qK3mxbpqC6iMaUiRK2Ps5DROkRy-4P3Tg_3fgDx34YwdFdvE8ASjA2KeSxEAvWmmVsWXtwl0eOSzJPAyYPIUBS2rdkDBk38Xh7UH_AP6WmVE</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1372060766</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Chemometric approaches to data assessment for a long-term case study of MIEX pretreatment performance</title><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Aslam, Zeeshan ; Dixon, Mike ; Chow, Christopher W.K. ; Morran, Jim ; Drikas, Mary ; van Leeuwen, John A.</creator><creatorcontrib>Aslam, Zeeshan ; Dixon, Mike ; Chow, Christopher W.K. ; Morran, Jim ; Drikas, Mary ; van Leeuwen, John A.</creatorcontrib><description>A specifically designed pilot plant facility located at the Mount Pleasant Water Treatment Plant in South Australia was used to investigate the efficiencies of several drinking water treatment processes, including (1) magnetic ion exchange (MIEX) as a pretreatment followed by conventional coagulation treatment, (2) conventional coagulation at pilot the plant alone, (3) MIEX followed by microfiltration (MF), and (4) MF alone. Dissolved organic matter (DOM) removal efficiency of the treatment processes and more importantly the treated water quality was assessed using dissolved organic carbon (DOC) measurement and together with the changes in the chromophoric organics character based on their molecular weight profiles determined by high-performance size exclusion chromatography (HPSEC) were also reported. Cluster analyses (CAs) were performed using the HPSEC peak area (after separated by peak fitting), and supported by DOC, UV absorbance at 254 nm, and SUVA in order to compare treatment efficiencies of these technologies. It was a novel way of applying CA as a data mining tool to interpret and assess DOM removal results. From the results of these CA, it was found that the MIEX process provided consistent treatment performance and highest removal of DOM, as well as removal of a broad range of molecular weight organics. In comparison coagulation with alum tended to remove the high molecular weight (&gt;1000 Da) compounds. This statistical approach provided improved understanding of the performances of the treatment processes, investigated at a molecular level, for the removal of DOM.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1944-3986</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1944-3994</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1944-3986</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1080/19443994.2012.751149</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>L'Aquila: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Analytical chemistry ; Applied sciences ; Assessments ; Carbon ; Chemistry ; Chromatographic methods and physical methods associated with chromatography ; Cluster analyses ; Coagulation ; Dissolved organic matter ; Drinking water and swimming-pool water. Desalination ; Exact sciences and technology ; High-performance size exclusion chromatography ; Magnetic ion exchange resin ; Molecular weight ; Natural organic matter ; Other chromatographic methods ; Pollution ; Pretreatment ; Water quality ; Water treatment ; Water treatment and pollution</subject><ispartof>Desalination and water treatment, 2013-04, Vol.51 (16-18), p.3639-3649</ispartof><rights>2012 Elsevier Inc.</rights><rights>2014 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c402t-a2b58d09841ab85912e6be497eefe1252b38a779ad22578969454e6070c32fca3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c402t-a2b58d09841ab85912e6be497eefe1252b38a779ad22578969454e6070c32fca3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27922,27923</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=27357402$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Aslam, Zeeshan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dixon, Mike</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chow, Christopher W.K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Morran, Jim</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Drikas, Mary</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van Leeuwen, John A.</creatorcontrib><title>Chemometric approaches to data assessment for a long-term case study of MIEX pretreatment performance</title><title>Desalination and water treatment</title><description>A specifically designed pilot plant facility located at the Mount Pleasant Water Treatment Plant in South Australia was used to investigate the efficiencies of several drinking water treatment processes, including (1) magnetic ion exchange (MIEX) as a pretreatment followed by conventional coagulation treatment, (2) conventional coagulation at pilot the plant alone, (3) MIEX followed by microfiltration (MF), and (4) MF alone. Dissolved organic matter (DOM) removal efficiency of the treatment processes and more importantly the treated water quality was assessed using dissolved organic carbon (DOC) measurement and together with the changes in the chromophoric organics character based on their molecular weight profiles determined by high-performance size exclusion chromatography (HPSEC) were also reported. Cluster analyses (CAs) were performed using the HPSEC peak area (after separated by peak fitting), and supported by DOC, UV absorbance at 254 nm, and SUVA in order to compare treatment efficiencies of these technologies. It was a novel way of applying CA as a data mining tool to interpret and assess DOM removal results. From the results of these CA, it was found that the MIEX process provided consistent treatment performance and highest removal of DOM, as well as removal of a broad range of molecular weight organics. In comparison coagulation with alum tended to remove the high molecular weight (&gt;1000 Da) compounds. This statistical approach provided improved understanding of the performances of the treatment processes, investigated at a molecular level, for the removal of DOM.</description><subject>Analytical chemistry</subject><subject>Applied sciences</subject><subject>Assessments</subject><subject>Carbon</subject><subject>Chemistry</subject><subject>Chromatographic methods and physical methods associated with chromatography</subject><subject>Cluster analyses</subject><subject>Coagulation</subject><subject>Dissolved organic matter</subject><subject>Drinking water and swimming-pool water. Desalination</subject><subject>Exact sciences and technology</subject><subject>High-performance size exclusion chromatography</subject><subject>Magnetic ion exchange resin</subject><subject>Molecular weight</subject><subject>Natural organic matter</subject><subject>Other chromatographic methods</subject><subject>Pollution</subject><subject>Pretreatment</subject><subject>Water quality</subject><subject>Water treatment</subject><subject>Water treatment and pollution</subject><issn>1944-3986</issn><issn>1944-3994</issn><issn>1944-3986</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkU9r3DAQxU1poSHZb5CDLoFevNVfy7oEwpK2Cwm9JNCbmJXHXRd75Wq0gXz7arNpyCnRRUL83hvmvao6F3wpeMu_Cqe1ck4vJRdyaY0Q2n2oTg7ftXJt8_HV-3O1IPrDyzHaGi1PKlxtcYoT5jQEBvOcIoQtEsuRdZCBARESTbjLrI-JARvj7nedMU0sACGjvO8eWezZ7fr6F5tTMULIT_yMqUgm2AU8qz71MBIunu_T6v7b9d3qR33z8_t6dXVTB81lrkFuTNtx12oBm9Y4IbHZoHYWsUchjdyoFqx10ElpbOsap43GhlselOwDqNPqy9G37PF3j5T9NFDAcYQdxj15YW3LlTNavY8qK3mxbpqC6iMaUiRK2Ps5DROkRy-4P3Tg_3fgDx34YwdFdvE8ASjA2KeSxEAvWmmVsWXtwl0eOSzJPAyYPIUBS2rdkDBk38Xh7UH_AP6WmVE</recordid><startdate>20130401</startdate><enddate>20130401</enddate><creator>Aslam, Zeeshan</creator><creator>Dixon, Mike</creator><creator>Chow, Christopher W.K.</creator><creator>Morran, Jim</creator><creator>Drikas, Mary</creator><creator>van Leeuwen, John A.</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>Desalination Publications</general><scope>6I.</scope><scope>AAFTH</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QH</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>H97</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>7SU</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>KR7</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20130401</creationdate><title>Chemometric approaches to data assessment for a long-term case study of MIEX pretreatment performance</title><author>Aslam, Zeeshan ; Dixon, Mike ; Chow, Christopher W.K. ; Morran, Jim ; Drikas, Mary ; van Leeuwen, John A.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c402t-a2b58d09841ab85912e6be497eefe1252b38a779ad22578969454e6070c32fca3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>Analytical chemistry</topic><topic>Applied sciences</topic><topic>Assessments</topic><topic>Carbon</topic><topic>Chemistry</topic><topic>Chromatographic methods and physical methods associated with chromatography</topic><topic>Cluster analyses</topic><topic>Coagulation</topic><topic>Dissolved organic matter</topic><topic>Drinking water and swimming-pool water. Desalination</topic><topic>Exact sciences and technology</topic><topic>High-performance size exclusion chromatography</topic><topic>Magnetic ion exchange resin</topic><topic>Molecular weight</topic><topic>Natural organic matter</topic><topic>Other chromatographic methods</topic><topic>Pollution</topic><topic>Pretreatment</topic><topic>Water quality</topic><topic>Water treatment</topic><topic>Water treatment and pollution</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Aslam, Zeeshan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dixon, Mike</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chow, Christopher W.K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Morran, Jim</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Drikas, Mary</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van Leeuwen, John A.</creatorcontrib><collection>ScienceDirect Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Elsevier:ScienceDirect:Open Access</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Aqualine</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 3: Aquatic Pollution &amp; Environmental Quality</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Desalination and water treatment</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Aslam, Zeeshan</au><au>Dixon, Mike</au><au>Chow, Christopher W.K.</au><au>Morran, Jim</au><au>Drikas, Mary</au><au>van Leeuwen, John A.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Chemometric approaches to data assessment for a long-term case study of MIEX pretreatment performance</atitle><jtitle>Desalination and water treatment</jtitle><date>2013-04-01</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>51</volume><issue>16-18</issue><spage>3639</spage><epage>3649</epage><pages>3639-3649</pages><issn>1944-3986</issn><issn>1944-3994</issn><eissn>1944-3986</eissn><abstract>A specifically designed pilot plant facility located at the Mount Pleasant Water Treatment Plant in South Australia was used to investigate the efficiencies of several drinking water treatment processes, including (1) magnetic ion exchange (MIEX) as a pretreatment followed by conventional coagulation treatment, (2) conventional coagulation at pilot the plant alone, (3) MIEX followed by microfiltration (MF), and (4) MF alone. Dissolved organic matter (DOM) removal efficiency of the treatment processes and more importantly the treated water quality was assessed using dissolved organic carbon (DOC) measurement and together with the changes in the chromophoric organics character based on their molecular weight profiles determined by high-performance size exclusion chromatography (HPSEC) were also reported. Cluster analyses (CAs) were performed using the HPSEC peak area (after separated by peak fitting), and supported by DOC, UV absorbance at 254 nm, and SUVA in order to compare treatment efficiencies of these technologies. It was a novel way of applying CA as a data mining tool to interpret and assess DOM removal results. From the results of these CA, it was found that the MIEX process provided consistent treatment performance and highest removal of DOM, as well as removal of a broad range of molecular weight organics. In comparison coagulation with alum tended to remove the high molecular weight (&gt;1000 Da) compounds. This statistical approach provided improved understanding of the performances of the treatment processes, investigated at a molecular level, for the removal of DOM.</abstract><cop>L'Aquila</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><doi>10.1080/19443994.2012.751149</doi><tpages>11</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1944-3986
ispartof Desalination and water treatment, 2013-04, Vol.51 (16-18), p.3639-3649
issn 1944-3986
1944-3994
1944-3986
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1778039543
source Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Analytical chemistry
Applied sciences
Assessments
Carbon
Chemistry
Chromatographic methods and physical methods associated with chromatography
Cluster analyses
Coagulation
Dissolved organic matter
Drinking water and swimming-pool water. Desalination
Exact sciences and technology
High-performance size exclusion chromatography
Magnetic ion exchange resin
Molecular weight
Natural organic matter
Other chromatographic methods
Pollution
Pretreatment
Water quality
Water treatment
Water treatment and pollution
title Chemometric approaches to data assessment for a long-term case study of MIEX pretreatment performance
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-14T00%3A56%3A01IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Chemometric%20approaches%20to%20data%20assessment%20for%20a%20long-term%20case%20study%20of%20MIEX%20pretreatment%20performance&rft.jtitle=Desalination%20and%20water%20treatment&rft.au=Aslam,%20Zeeshan&rft.date=2013-04-01&rft.volume=51&rft.issue=16-18&rft.spage=3639&rft.epage=3649&rft.pages=3639-3649&rft.issn=1944-3986&rft.eissn=1944-3986&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080/19443994.2012.751149&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1372060766%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1372060766&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S1944398624187358&rfr_iscdi=true