Does an on-road motorcycle coaching program reduce crashes in novice riders? A randomised control trial
•On-road motorcycle coaching was not associated with reduced risk of crash.•Coaching was associated with reduced near misses after 3 but not 12 months.•Riders in the coaching group reported more confidence, speeding behaviours and riding time. Motorcycle riding is increasing globally and confers a h...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Accident analysis and prevention 2016-01, Vol.86, p.40-46 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 46 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | |
| container_start_page | 40 |
| container_title | Accident analysis and prevention |
| container_volume | 86 |
| creator | Ivers, Rebecca Q. Sakashita, Chika Senserrick, Teresa Elkington, Jane Lo, Serigne Boufous, Soufiane de Rome, Liz |
| description | •On-road motorcycle coaching was not associated with reduced risk of crash.•Coaching was associated with reduced near misses after 3 but not 12 months.•Riders in the coaching group reported more confidence, speeding behaviours and riding time.
Motorcycle riding is increasing globally and confers a high risk of crash-related injury and death. There is community demand for investment in rider training programs but no high-quality evidence about its effectiveness in preventing crashes. This randomised trial of an on-road rider coaching program aimed to determine its effectiveness in reducing crashes in novice motorcycle riders.
Between May 2010 and October 2012, 2399 newly-licensed provisional riders were recruited in Victoria, Australia and completed a telephone interview before randomisation to intervention or control groups. Riders in the intervention group were offered an on-road motorcycle rider coaching program which involved pre-program activities, 4h riding and facilitated discussion in small groups with a riding coach. Outcome measures were collected for all participants via telephone interviews at 3 and 12 months after program delivery (or equivalent for controls), and via linkage to police-recorded crash and offence data. The primary outcome was a composite measure of police-recorded and self-reported crashes; secondary outcomes included traffic offences, near crashes, riding exposure, and riding behaviours and motivations.
Follow-up was 89% at 3 months and 88% at 12 months; 60% of the intervention group completed the program. Intention-to-treat analyses conducted in 2014 indicated no effect on crash risk at 3 months (adjusted OR 0.90, 95% CI: 0.65–1.27) or 12 months (adjusted OR 1.00, 95% CI: 0.78–1.29). Riders in the intervention group reported increased riding exposure, speeding behaviours and rider confidence.
There was no evidence that this on-road motorcycle rider coaching program reduced the risk of crash, and we found an increase in crash-related risk factors. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.aap.2015.10.015 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1778033214</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S000145751530097X</els_id><sourcerecordid>1749609628</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c490t-b198089b84c200c0753b1e72ad3a7727942b192cfe58fbfccd8d7d9c22d0ae003</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkc2LFDEQxYMo7rj6B3iRHL30WPnqpPEgy_oJC170HNJJ9WyG7mRMehb2v98Ms3qUPT2q-L1HUY-Qtwy2DFj_Yb917rDlwFSbt02ekQ0zeug4KP2cbACAdVJpdUFe1bpvozZavSQXvFdMCKE2ZPc5Y6Uu0Zy6kl2gS15z8fd-Ruqz87cx7eih5F1xCy0Yjr7ti6u3zRUTTfkutk2JAUv9RK9ocSnkJVYMzZ7Wkme6lujm1-TF5OaKbx71kvz--uXX9ffu5ue3H9dXN52XA6zdyAYDZhiN9BzAg1ZiZKi5C8JpzfUgeUO4n1CZaZy8DyboMHjOAzgEEJfk_Tm33fzniHW17RiP8-wS5mO1TGsDQnAmn4AqIXsmpXgCKocehp6bhrIz6kuuteBkDyUurtxbBvbUmt3b1po9tXZaNWmed4_xx3HB8M_xt6YGfDwD2F53F7HY6iMmjyEW9KsNOf4n_gGejqcz</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1749609628</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Does an on-road motorcycle coaching program reduce crashes in novice riders? A randomised control trial</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)</source><creator>Ivers, Rebecca Q. ; Sakashita, Chika ; Senserrick, Teresa ; Elkington, Jane ; Lo, Serigne ; Boufous, Soufiane ; de Rome, Liz</creator><creatorcontrib>Ivers, Rebecca Q. ; Sakashita, Chika ; Senserrick, Teresa ; Elkington, Jane ; Lo, Serigne ; Boufous, Soufiane ; de Rome, Liz</creatorcontrib><description>•On-road motorcycle coaching was not associated with reduced risk of crash.•Coaching was associated with reduced near misses after 3 but not 12 months.•Riders in the coaching group reported more confidence, speeding behaviours and riding time.
Motorcycle riding is increasing globally and confers a high risk of crash-related injury and death. There is community demand for investment in rider training programs but no high-quality evidence about its effectiveness in preventing crashes. This randomised trial of an on-road rider coaching program aimed to determine its effectiveness in reducing crashes in novice motorcycle riders.
Between May 2010 and October 2012, 2399 newly-licensed provisional riders were recruited in Victoria, Australia and completed a telephone interview before randomisation to intervention or control groups. Riders in the intervention group were offered an on-road motorcycle rider coaching program which involved pre-program activities, 4h riding and facilitated discussion in small groups with a riding coach. Outcome measures were collected for all participants via telephone interviews at 3 and 12 months after program delivery (or equivalent for controls), and via linkage to police-recorded crash and offence data. The primary outcome was a composite measure of police-recorded and self-reported crashes; secondary outcomes included traffic offences, near crashes, riding exposure, and riding behaviours and motivations.
Follow-up was 89% at 3 months and 88% at 12 months; 60% of the intervention group completed the program. Intention-to-treat analyses conducted in 2014 indicated no effect on crash risk at 3 months (adjusted OR 0.90, 95% CI: 0.65–1.27) or 12 months (adjusted OR 1.00, 95% CI: 0.78–1.29). Riders in the intervention group reported increased riding exposure, speeding behaviours and rider confidence.
There was no evidence that this on-road motorcycle rider coaching program reduced the risk of crash, and we found an increase in crash-related risk factors.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0001-4575</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-2057</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.aap.2015.10.015</identifier><identifier>PMID: 26513335</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Accidents, Traffic - prevention & control ; Accidents, Traffic - statistics & numerical data ; Adjustment ; Adult ; Australia ; Automobile Driving - education ; Crashes ; Epidemiology ; Exposure ; Female ; Follow-Up Studies ; Humans ; Injury prevention ; Intention to Treat Analysis ; Licensure ; Male ; Motivation ; Motorcycle ; Motorcycles ; Motorcycles - statistics & numerical data ; Police ; Residence Characteristics ; Riders ; Riding ; Risk ; Risk analysis ; Risk Factors ; Road safety ; Survival Analysis ; Victoria</subject><ispartof>Accident analysis and prevention, 2016-01, Vol.86, p.40-46</ispartof><rights>2015 The Authors</rights><rights>Copyright © 2015 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c490t-b198089b84c200c0753b1e72ad3a7727942b192cfe58fbfccd8d7d9c22d0ae003</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c490t-b198089b84c200c0753b1e72ad3a7727942b192cfe58fbfccd8d7d9c22d0ae003</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2015.10.015$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>315,781,785,3551,27929,27930,46000</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26513335$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ivers, Rebecca Q.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sakashita, Chika</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Senserrick, Teresa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Elkington, Jane</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lo, Serigne</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Boufous, Soufiane</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Rome, Liz</creatorcontrib><title>Does an on-road motorcycle coaching program reduce crashes in novice riders? A randomised control trial</title><title>Accident analysis and prevention</title><addtitle>Accid Anal Prev</addtitle><description>•On-road motorcycle coaching was not associated with reduced risk of crash.•Coaching was associated with reduced near misses after 3 but not 12 months.•Riders in the coaching group reported more confidence, speeding behaviours and riding time.
Motorcycle riding is increasing globally and confers a high risk of crash-related injury and death. There is community demand for investment in rider training programs but no high-quality evidence about its effectiveness in preventing crashes. This randomised trial of an on-road rider coaching program aimed to determine its effectiveness in reducing crashes in novice motorcycle riders.
Between May 2010 and October 2012, 2399 newly-licensed provisional riders were recruited in Victoria, Australia and completed a telephone interview before randomisation to intervention or control groups. Riders in the intervention group were offered an on-road motorcycle rider coaching program which involved pre-program activities, 4h riding and facilitated discussion in small groups with a riding coach. Outcome measures were collected for all participants via telephone interviews at 3 and 12 months after program delivery (or equivalent for controls), and via linkage to police-recorded crash and offence data. The primary outcome was a composite measure of police-recorded and self-reported crashes; secondary outcomes included traffic offences, near crashes, riding exposure, and riding behaviours and motivations.
Follow-up was 89% at 3 months and 88% at 12 months; 60% of the intervention group completed the program. Intention-to-treat analyses conducted in 2014 indicated no effect on crash risk at 3 months (adjusted OR 0.90, 95% CI: 0.65–1.27) or 12 months (adjusted OR 1.00, 95% CI: 0.78–1.29). Riders in the intervention group reported increased riding exposure, speeding behaviours and rider confidence.
There was no evidence that this on-road motorcycle rider coaching program reduced the risk of crash, and we found an increase in crash-related risk factors.</description><subject>Accidents, Traffic - prevention & control</subject><subject>Accidents, Traffic - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>Adjustment</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Australia</subject><subject>Automobile Driving - education</subject><subject>Crashes</subject><subject>Epidemiology</subject><subject>Exposure</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Follow-Up Studies</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Injury prevention</subject><subject>Intention to Treat Analysis</subject><subject>Licensure</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Motivation</subject><subject>Motorcycle</subject><subject>Motorcycles</subject><subject>Motorcycles - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>Police</subject><subject>Residence Characteristics</subject><subject>Riders</subject><subject>Riding</subject><subject>Risk</subject><subject>Risk analysis</subject><subject>Risk Factors</subject><subject>Road safety</subject><subject>Survival Analysis</subject><subject>Victoria</subject><issn>0001-4575</issn><issn>1879-2057</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkc2LFDEQxYMo7rj6B3iRHL30WPnqpPEgy_oJC170HNJJ9WyG7mRMehb2v98Ms3qUPT2q-L1HUY-Qtwy2DFj_Yb917rDlwFSbt02ekQ0zeug4KP2cbACAdVJpdUFe1bpvozZavSQXvFdMCKE2ZPc5Y6Uu0Zy6kl2gS15z8fd-Ruqz87cx7eih5F1xCy0Yjr7ti6u3zRUTTfkutk2JAUv9RK9ocSnkJVYMzZ7Wkme6lujm1-TF5OaKbx71kvz--uXX9ffu5ue3H9dXN52XA6zdyAYDZhiN9BzAg1ZiZKi5C8JpzfUgeUO4n1CZaZy8DyboMHjOAzgEEJfk_Tm33fzniHW17RiP8-wS5mO1TGsDQnAmn4AqIXsmpXgCKocehp6bhrIz6kuuteBkDyUurtxbBvbUmt3b1po9tXZaNWmed4_xx3HB8M_xt6YGfDwD2F53F7HY6iMmjyEW9KsNOf4n_gGejqcz</recordid><startdate>201601</startdate><enddate>201601</enddate><creator>Ivers, Rebecca Q.</creator><creator>Sakashita, Chika</creator><creator>Senserrick, Teresa</creator><creator>Elkington, Jane</creator><creator>Lo, Serigne</creator><creator>Boufous, Soufiane</creator><creator>de Rome, Liz</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><scope>6I.</scope><scope>AAFTH</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>7T2</scope><scope>7U2</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>KR7</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201601</creationdate><title>Does an on-road motorcycle coaching program reduce crashes in novice riders? A randomised control trial</title><author>Ivers, Rebecca Q. ; Sakashita, Chika ; Senserrick, Teresa ; Elkington, Jane ; Lo, Serigne ; Boufous, Soufiane ; de Rome, Liz</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c490t-b198089b84c200c0753b1e72ad3a7727942b192cfe58fbfccd8d7d9c22d0ae003</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Accidents, Traffic - prevention & control</topic><topic>Accidents, Traffic - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>Adjustment</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Australia</topic><topic>Automobile Driving - education</topic><topic>Crashes</topic><topic>Epidemiology</topic><topic>Exposure</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Follow-Up Studies</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Injury prevention</topic><topic>Intention to Treat Analysis</topic><topic>Licensure</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Motivation</topic><topic>Motorcycle</topic><topic>Motorcycles</topic><topic>Motorcycles - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>Police</topic><topic>Residence Characteristics</topic><topic>Riders</topic><topic>Riding</topic><topic>Risk</topic><topic>Risk analysis</topic><topic>Risk Factors</topic><topic>Road safety</topic><topic>Survival Analysis</topic><topic>Victoria</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ivers, Rebecca Q.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sakashita, Chika</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Senserrick, Teresa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Elkington, Jane</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lo, Serigne</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Boufous, Soufiane</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Rome, Liz</creatorcontrib><collection>ScienceDirect Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Elsevier:ScienceDirect:Open Access</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Health and Safety Science Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Safety Science and Risk</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Mechanical & Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Accident analysis and prevention</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ivers, Rebecca Q.</au><au>Sakashita, Chika</au><au>Senserrick, Teresa</au><au>Elkington, Jane</au><au>Lo, Serigne</au><au>Boufous, Soufiane</au><au>de Rome, Liz</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Does an on-road motorcycle coaching program reduce crashes in novice riders? A randomised control trial</atitle><jtitle>Accident analysis and prevention</jtitle><addtitle>Accid Anal Prev</addtitle><date>2016-01</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>86</volume><spage>40</spage><epage>46</epage><pages>40-46</pages><issn>0001-4575</issn><eissn>1879-2057</eissn><abstract>•On-road motorcycle coaching was not associated with reduced risk of crash.•Coaching was associated with reduced near misses after 3 but not 12 months.•Riders in the coaching group reported more confidence, speeding behaviours and riding time.
Motorcycle riding is increasing globally and confers a high risk of crash-related injury and death. There is community demand for investment in rider training programs but no high-quality evidence about its effectiveness in preventing crashes. This randomised trial of an on-road rider coaching program aimed to determine its effectiveness in reducing crashes in novice motorcycle riders.
Between May 2010 and October 2012, 2399 newly-licensed provisional riders were recruited in Victoria, Australia and completed a telephone interview before randomisation to intervention or control groups. Riders in the intervention group were offered an on-road motorcycle rider coaching program which involved pre-program activities, 4h riding and facilitated discussion in small groups with a riding coach. Outcome measures were collected for all participants via telephone interviews at 3 and 12 months after program delivery (or equivalent for controls), and via linkage to police-recorded crash and offence data. The primary outcome was a composite measure of police-recorded and self-reported crashes; secondary outcomes included traffic offences, near crashes, riding exposure, and riding behaviours and motivations.
Follow-up was 89% at 3 months and 88% at 12 months; 60% of the intervention group completed the program. Intention-to-treat analyses conducted in 2014 indicated no effect on crash risk at 3 months (adjusted OR 0.90, 95% CI: 0.65–1.27) or 12 months (adjusted OR 1.00, 95% CI: 0.78–1.29). Riders in the intervention group reported increased riding exposure, speeding behaviours and rider confidence.
There was no evidence that this on-road motorcycle rider coaching program reduced the risk of crash, and we found an increase in crash-related risk factors.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>26513335</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.aap.2015.10.015</doi><tpages>7</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0001-4575 |
| ispartof | Accident analysis and prevention, 2016-01, Vol.86, p.40-46 |
| issn | 0001-4575 1879-2057 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1778033214 |
| source | MEDLINE; Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier) |
| subjects | Accidents, Traffic - prevention & control Accidents, Traffic - statistics & numerical data Adjustment Adult Australia Automobile Driving - education Crashes Epidemiology Exposure Female Follow-Up Studies Humans Injury prevention Intention to Treat Analysis Licensure Male Motivation Motorcycle Motorcycles Motorcycles - statistics & numerical data Police Residence Characteristics Riders Riding Risk Risk analysis Risk Factors Road safety Survival Analysis Victoria |
| title | Does an on-road motorcycle coaching program reduce crashes in novice riders? A randomised control trial |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-12T00%3A17%3A15IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Does%20an%20on-road%20motorcycle%20coaching%20program%20reduce%20crashes%20in%20novice%20riders?%20A%20randomised%20control%20trial&rft.jtitle=Accident%20analysis%20and%20prevention&rft.au=Ivers,%20Rebecca%20Q.&rft.date=2016-01&rft.volume=86&rft.spage=40&rft.epage=46&rft.pages=40-46&rft.issn=0001-4575&rft.eissn=1879-2057&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.aap.2015.10.015&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1749609628%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1749609628&rft_id=info:pmid/26513335&rft_els_id=S000145751530097X&rfr_iscdi=true |