On the implementation of the surface conductance approach using a block-centred surface–subsurface hydrology model

•The surface conductance (SC) approach is explored for rainfall partitioning in a block-centred code.•A discrepancy arises between saturation of the uppermost node and the head reaching the land surface.•Previous research suggests the exchange interface be represented by the uppermost half-cell in M...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of hydrology (Amsterdam) 2013-07, Vol.496, p.1-8
Hauptverfasser: Liggett, Jessica E., Knowling, Matthew J., Werner, Adrian D., Simmons, Craig T.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 8
container_issue
container_start_page 1
container_title Journal of hydrology (Amsterdam)
container_volume 496
creator Liggett, Jessica E.
Knowling, Matthew J.
Werner, Adrian D.
Simmons, Craig T.
description •The surface conductance (SC) approach is explored for rainfall partitioning in a block-centred code.•A discrepancy arises between saturation of the uppermost node and the head reaching the land surface.•Previous research suggests the exchange interface be represented by the uppermost half-cell in MODHMS.•Our work suggests that the previous recommendation prevents accurate simulation of rainfall partitioning.•Adding a thin surface layer improves model accuracy with minimal increase in run time. In physically based catchment hydrology models, dynamic surface–subsurface interactions are often represented using the surface conductance (SC) coupling approach. Guidance on SC parameterisation within block-centred codes is limited, and common practice is to express the SC coefficient as the quotient of the vertical saturated hydraulic conductivity and the half-cell thickness of the uppermost layer. This study evaluates the implementation of the SC approach utilising a popular block-centred, surface–subsurface hydrology model (MODHMS) to simulate one-dimensional infiltration experiments under Hortonian conditions. Results show that defining the SC coefficient based on a half-cell thickness of the uppermost subsurface cell inhibits accurate prediction of infiltration rates (qe) and the time to initiate surface runoff (tro) for the adopted rainfall–runoff scenario. Increasing the SC coefficient independently of the grid allows for accurate simulation of qe, but not tro. The addition of a thin layer at the surface is shown to improve model accuracy substantially, such that qe and tro approach those obtained using an equivalent mesh-centred model (i.e. where the surface and upper subsurface nodes are coincident). Whilst the addition of a single thin layer in block-centred codes allows improved prediction of surface–subsurface interaction, it does not provide a surrogate for fine discretisation throughout the subsurface that is necessary for accurate simulation of unsaturated zone flow. This study offers guidance on the implementation of the SC approach in a block-centred code and demonstrates the importance of systematic testing of parameters (that are otherwise calibrated) in physically based surface–subsurface hydrology models.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2013.05.008
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1778028721</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0022169413003673</els_id><sourcerecordid>1746890499</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a428t-cd8746fe62891a08b04c21c1130d03c2d9758c320c6f7b788dcdf7b51388c5893</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkcFO4zAQhi3ESlvYfYSVckHikjC2k9g5IYSARarEhT1b7tihLklc7ASpN96BN-RJcLeFK_ji0ej_Zkb_T8gfCgUFWp-titVyY4LvCgaUF1AVAPKAzKgUTc4EiEMyA2Asp3VT_iRHMa4gPc7LGRnvhmxc2sz16872dhj16PyQ-fZ_N06h1Wgz9IOZcNRDqvV6HbzGZTZFNzxkOlt0Hh9zTGyw5gN5e3mN0-KD353nHzZZ743tfpEfre6i_b3_j8m_66v7y7_5_O7m9vJinuuSyTFHI0VZt7ZmsqEa5AJKZBQp5WCAIzONqCRyBli3YiGkNGhSUVEuJVay4cfkdDc3Xfw02Tiq3kW0XacH66eoqBASmBSMfkNa1rKBstlOrXZSDD7GYFu1Dq7XYaMoqG0gaqX2gahtIAoqlQJJ3Ml-hY6ouzYkO138hJmoGJdcJN35TmeTNc_OBhXR2WS9ccHiqIx3X2x6B_6jpkw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1746890499</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>On the implementation of the surface conductance approach using a block-centred surface–subsurface hydrology model</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Liggett, Jessica E. ; Knowling, Matthew J. ; Werner, Adrian D. ; Simmons, Craig T.</creator><creatorcontrib>Liggett, Jessica E. ; Knowling, Matthew J. ; Werner, Adrian D. ; Simmons, Craig T.</creatorcontrib><description>•The surface conductance (SC) approach is explored for rainfall partitioning in a block-centred code.•A discrepancy arises between saturation of the uppermost node and the head reaching the land surface.•Previous research suggests the exchange interface be represented by the uppermost half-cell in MODHMS.•Our work suggests that the previous recommendation prevents accurate simulation of rainfall partitioning.•Adding a thin surface layer improves model accuracy with minimal increase in run time. In physically based catchment hydrology models, dynamic surface–subsurface interactions are often represented using the surface conductance (SC) coupling approach. Guidance on SC parameterisation within block-centred codes is limited, and common practice is to express the SC coefficient as the quotient of the vertical saturated hydraulic conductivity and the half-cell thickness of the uppermost layer. This study evaluates the implementation of the SC approach utilising a popular block-centred, surface–subsurface hydrology model (MODHMS) to simulate one-dimensional infiltration experiments under Hortonian conditions. Results show that defining the SC coefficient based on a half-cell thickness of the uppermost subsurface cell inhibits accurate prediction of infiltration rates (qe) and the time to initiate surface runoff (tro) for the adopted rainfall–runoff scenario. Increasing the SC coefficient independently of the grid allows for accurate simulation of qe, but not tro. The addition of a thin layer at the surface is shown to improve model accuracy substantially, such that qe and tro approach those obtained using an equivalent mesh-centred model (i.e. where the surface and upper subsurface nodes are coincident). Whilst the addition of a single thin layer in block-centred codes allows improved prediction of surface–subsurface interaction, it does not provide a surrogate for fine discretisation throughout the subsurface that is necessary for accurate simulation of unsaturated zone flow. This study offers guidance on the implementation of the SC approach in a block-centred code and demonstrates the importance of systematic testing of parameters (that are otherwise calibrated) in physically based surface–subsurface hydrology models.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-1694</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-2707</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2013.05.008</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JHYDA7</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Kidlington: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Blocking ; Catchment modelling ; Coefficients ; Computer simulation ; Conductance ; Earth sciences ; Earth, ocean, space ; Exact sciences and technology ; Fully integrated model ; Hydrology ; Hydrology models ; Hydrology. Hydrogeology ; Infiltration ; Mathematical models ; MODHMS ; Surface conductance approach ; Surface–subsurface interaction ; Thin films</subject><ispartof>Journal of hydrology (Amsterdam), 2013-07, Vol.496, p.1-8</ispartof><rights>2013 Elsevier B.V.</rights><rights>2014 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a428t-cd8746fe62891a08b04c21c1130d03c2d9758c320c6f7b788dcdf7b51388c5893</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a428t-cd8746fe62891a08b04c21c1130d03c2d9758c320c6f7b788dcdf7b51388c5893</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022169413003673$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=27523837$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Liggett, Jessica E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Knowling, Matthew J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Werner, Adrian D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Simmons, Craig T.</creatorcontrib><title>On the implementation of the surface conductance approach using a block-centred surface–subsurface hydrology model</title><title>Journal of hydrology (Amsterdam)</title><description>•The surface conductance (SC) approach is explored for rainfall partitioning in a block-centred code.•A discrepancy arises between saturation of the uppermost node and the head reaching the land surface.•Previous research suggests the exchange interface be represented by the uppermost half-cell in MODHMS.•Our work suggests that the previous recommendation prevents accurate simulation of rainfall partitioning.•Adding a thin surface layer improves model accuracy with minimal increase in run time. In physically based catchment hydrology models, dynamic surface–subsurface interactions are often represented using the surface conductance (SC) coupling approach. Guidance on SC parameterisation within block-centred codes is limited, and common practice is to express the SC coefficient as the quotient of the vertical saturated hydraulic conductivity and the half-cell thickness of the uppermost layer. This study evaluates the implementation of the SC approach utilising a popular block-centred, surface–subsurface hydrology model (MODHMS) to simulate one-dimensional infiltration experiments under Hortonian conditions. Results show that defining the SC coefficient based on a half-cell thickness of the uppermost subsurface cell inhibits accurate prediction of infiltration rates (qe) and the time to initiate surface runoff (tro) for the adopted rainfall–runoff scenario. Increasing the SC coefficient independently of the grid allows for accurate simulation of qe, but not tro. The addition of a thin layer at the surface is shown to improve model accuracy substantially, such that qe and tro approach those obtained using an equivalent mesh-centred model (i.e. where the surface and upper subsurface nodes are coincident). Whilst the addition of a single thin layer in block-centred codes allows improved prediction of surface–subsurface interaction, it does not provide a surrogate for fine discretisation throughout the subsurface that is necessary for accurate simulation of unsaturated zone flow. This study offers guidance on the implementation of the SC approach in a block-centred code and demonstrates the importance of systematic testing of parameters (that are otherwise calibrated) in physically based surface–subsurface hydrology models.</description><subject>Blocking</subject><subject>Catchment modelling</subject><subject>Coefficients</subject><subject>Computer simulation</subject><subject>Conductance</subject><subject>Earth sciences</subject><subject>Earth, ocean, space</subject><subject>Exact sciences and technology</subject><subject>Fully integrated model</subject><subject>Hydrology</subject><subject>Hydrology models</subject><subject>Hydrology. Hydrogeology</subject><subject>Infiltration</subject><subject>Mathematical models</subject><subject>MODHMS</subject><subject>Surface conductance approach</subject><subject>Surface–subsurface interaction</subject><subject>Thin films</subject><issn>0022-1694</issn><issn>1879-2707</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNkcFO4zAQhi3ESlvYfYSVckHikjC2k9g5IYSARarEhT1b7tihLklc7ASpN96BN-RJcLeFK_ji0ej_Zkb_T8gfCgUFWp-titVyY4LvCgaUF1AVAPKAzKgUTc4EiEMyA2Asp3VT_iRHMa4gPc7LGRnvhmxc2sz16872dhj16PyQ-fZ_N06h1Wgz9IOZcNRDqvV6HbzGZTZFNzxkOlt0Hh9zTGyw5gN5e3mN0-KD353nHzZZ743tfpEfre6i_b3_j8m_66v7y7_5_O7m9vJinuuSyTFHI0VZt7ZmsqEa5AJKZBQp5WCAIzONqCRyBli3YiGkNGhSUVEuJVay4cfkdDc3Xfw02Tiq3kW0XacH66eoqBASmBSMfkNa1rKBstlOrXZSDD7GYFu1Dq7XYaMoqG0gaqX2gahtIAoqlQJJ3Ml-hY6ouzYkO138hJmoGJdcJN35TmeTNc_OBhXR2WS9ccHiqIx3X2x6B_6jpkw</recordid><startdate>20130724</startdate><enddate>20130724</enddate><creator>Liggett, Jessica E.</creator><creator>Knowling, Matthew J.</creator><creator>Werner, Adrian D.</creator><creator>Simmons, Craig T.</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QH</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>KR7</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20130724</creationdate><title>On the implementation of the surface conductance approach using a block-centred surface–subsurface hydrology model</title><author>Liggett, Jessica E. ; Knowling, Matthew J. ; Werner, Adrian D. ; Simmons, Craig T.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a428t-cd8746fe62891a08b04c21c1130d03c2d9758c320c6f7b788dcdf7b51388c5893</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>Blocking</topic><topic>Catchment modelling</topic><topic>Coefficients</topic><topic>Computer simulation</topic><topic>Conductance</topic><topic>Earth sciences</topic><topic>Earth, ocean, space</topic><topic>Exact sciences and technology</topic><topic>Fully integrated model</topic><topic>Hydrology</topic><topic>Hydrology models</topic><topic>Hydrology. Hydrogeology</topic><topic>Infiltration</topic><topic>Mathematical models</topic><topic>MODHMS</topic><topic>Surface conductance approach</topic><topic>Surface–subsurface interaction</topic><topic>Thin films</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Liggett, Jessica E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Knowling, Matthew J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Werner, Adrian D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Simmons, Craig T.</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Aqualine</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy &amp; Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Journal of hydrology (Amsterdam)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Liggett, Jessica E.</au><au>Knowling, Matthew J.</au><au>Werner, Adrian D.</au><au>Simmons, Craig T.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>On the implementation of the surface conductance approach using a block-centred surface–subsurface hydrology model</atitle><jtitle>Journal of hydrology (Amsterdam)</jtitle><date>2013-07-24</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>496</volume><spage>1</spage><epage>8</epage><pages>1-8</pages><issn>0022-1694</issn><eissn>1879-2707</eissn><coden>JHYDA7</coden><abstract>•The surface conductance (SC) approach is explored for rainfall partitioning in a block-centred code.•A discrepancy arises between saturation of the uppermost node and the head reaching the land surface.•Previous research suggests the exchange interface be represented by the uppermost half-cell in MODHMS.•Our work suggests that the previous recommendation prevents accurate simulation of rainfall partitioning.•Adding a thin surface layer improves model accuracy with minimal increase in run time. In physically based catchment hydrology models, dynamic surface–subsurface interactions are often represented using the surface conductance (SC) coupling approach. Guidance on SC parameterisation within block-centred codes is limited, and common practice is to express the SC coefficient as the quotient of the vertical saturated hydraulic conductivity and the half-cell thickness of the uppermost layer. This study evaluates the implementation of the SC approach utilising a popular block-centred, surface–subsurface hydrology model (MODHMS) to simulate one-dimensional infiltration experiments under Hortonian conditions. Results show that defining the SC coefficient based on a half-cell thickness of the uppermost subsurface cell inhibits accurate prediction of infiltration rates (qe) and the time to initiate surface runoff (tro) for the adopted rainfall–runoff scenario. Increasing the SC coefficient independently of the grid allows for accurate simulation of qe, but not tro. The addition of a thin layer at the surface is shown to improve model accuracy substantially, such that qe and tro approach those obtained using an equivalent mesh-centred model (i.e. where the surface and upper subsurface nodes are coincident). Whilst the addition of a single thin layer in block-centred codes allows improved prediction of surface–subsurface interaction, it does not provide a surrogate for fine discretisation throughout the subsurface that is necessary for accurate simulation of unsaturated zone flow. This study offers guidance on the implementation of the SC approach in a block-centred code and demonstrates the importance of systematic testing of parameters (that are otherwise calibrated) in physically based surface–subsurface hydrology models.</abstract><cop>Kidlington</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><doi>10.1016/j.jhydrol.2013.05.008</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0022-1694
ispartof Journal of hydrology (Amsterdam), 2013-07, Vol.496, p.1-8
issn 0022-1694
1879-2707
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1778028721
source Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Blocking
Catchment modelling
Coefficients
Computer simulation
Conductance
Earth sciences
Earth, ocean, space
Exact sciences and technology
Fully integrated model
Hydrology
Hydrology models
Hydrology. Hydrogeology
Infiltration
Mathematical models
MODHMS
Surface conductance approach
Surface–subsurface interaction
Thin films
title On the implementation of the surface conductance approach using a block-centred surface–subsurface hydrology model
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-02T12%3A11%3A59IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=On%20the%20implementation%20of%20the%20surface%20conductance%20approach%20using%20a%20block-centred%20surface%E2%80%93subsurface%20hydrology%20model&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20hydrology%20(Amsterdam)&rft.au=Liggett,%20Jessica%20E.&rft.date=2013-07-24&rft.volume=496&rft.spage=1&rft.epage=8&rft.pages=1-8&rft.issn=0022-1694&rft.eissn=1879-2707&rft.coden=JHYDA7&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2013.05.008&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1746890499%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1746890499&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0022169413003673&rfr_iscdi=true