New hybrid reformations of peripheral CT angiography: do we still need axial images?
Abstract Purpose To quantify the detectability of peripheral artery stenosis on hybrid CT angiography (CTA) reformations. Methods Hybrid reformations were developed by combining multipath curved planar reformations (mpCPR) and maximum intensity projections (MIP). Fifty peripheral CTAs were evaluated...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Clinical imaging 2015-07, Vol.39 (4), p.603-607 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 607 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 4 |
| container_start_page | 603 |
| container_title | Clinical imaging |
| container_volume | 39 |
| creator | Schernthaner, Ruediger Egbert Wolf, Florian Mistelbauer, Gabriel Weber, Michael Sramek, Milos Groeller, Eduard Loewe, Christian |
| description | Abstract Purpose To quantify the detectability of peripheral artery stenosis on hybrid CT angiography (CTA) reformations. Methods Hybrid reformations were developed by combining multipath curved planar reformations (mpCPR) and maximum intensity projections (MIP). Fifty peripheral CTAs were evaluated twice: either with MIP, mpCPR and axial images or with hybrid reformations only. Digital subtraction angiography served as gold standard. Results Using hybrid reformations, two independent readers detected 88.0% and 81.3% of significant stenosis, respectively. However, CTA including axial images detected statistically significant more lesions (98%). Conclusion Peripheral CTA reading including axial images is still recommended. Further improvement of these hybrid reformations is necessary. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.clinimag.2015.03.005 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1778027609</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0899707115000662</els_id><sourcerecordid>3710164641</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c587t-a1bdfdcbbdbe1b2a799010ef9bacd4dd215bd7fbbdbce035b851ee492f511453</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkk9v1DAQxS0EotvCV6gsceGSMHbi2ObAH60oIFVwYO-WY092vWSTYO9S9tvjsC1IvZSTD_N7M573hpBLBiUD1rzalq4PQ9jZdcmBiRKqEkA8IgumZFXUtdaPyQKU1oUEyc7IeUpbyEJdy6fkjAvFRVWLBVl9wRu6ObYxeBqxG-PO7sM4JDp2dMIYpg1G29PlitphHcZ1tNPm-Jr6kd4gTfvQ93RA9NT-Chmb_4Pp7TPypLN9wue37wVZXX1YLT8V118_fl6-vy6cUHJfWNb6zru29S2yllupNTDATrfW-dp7zkTrZTfXHUIlWiUYYq15JxirRXVBXp7aTnH8ccC0N7uQHPa9HXA8JMOkVMBlA_o_UME4q7mqHkYbpQAakE1GX9xDt-MhDnnlmZKgZK3m2c2JcnFMKZtsppiNikfDwMxhmq25C9PMYRqoTA4zCy9v2x_aHfq_srv0MvDuBGA2-WfAaJILODj0IaLbGz-Gh2e8udfiD-Zs_x2PmP7tYxI3YL7NJzVfFBOQTWh49RsGsMgI</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1687087489</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>New hybrid reformations of peripheral CT angiography: do we still need axial images?</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)</source><creator>Schernthaner, Ruediger Egbert ; Wolf, Florian ; Mistelbauer, Gabriel ; Weber, Michael ; Sramek, Milos ; Groeller, Eduard ; Loewe, Christian</creator><creatorcontrib>Schernthaner, Ruediger Egbert ; Wolf, Florian ; Mistelbauer, Gabriel ; Weber, Michael ; Sramek, Milos ; Groeller, Eduard ; Loewe, Christian</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract Purpose To quantify the detectability of peripheral artery stenosis on hybrid CT angiography (CTA) reformations. Methods Hybrid reformations were developed by combining multipath curved planar reformations (mpCPR) and maximum intensity projections (MIP). Fifty peripheral CTAs were evaluated twice: either with MIP, mpCPR and axial images or with hybrid reformations only. Digital subtraction angiography served as gold standard. Results Using hybrid reformations, two independent readers detected 88.0% and 81.3% of significant stenosis, respectively. However, CTA including axial images detected statistically significant more lesions (98%). Conclusion Peripheral CTA reading including axial images is still recommended. Further improvement of these hybrid reformations is necessary.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0899-7071</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-4499</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.clinimag.2015.03.005</identifier><identifier>PMID: 25825345</identifier><identifier>CODEN: CLIMEB</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Accuracy ; Adult ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Angiography ; Angiography, Digital Subtraction - methods ; Arterial Occlusive Diseases - diagnostic imaging ; Calcification ; Constriction, Pathologic - diagnostic imaging ; CT angiography ; Digital ; Female ; Humans ; Image detection ; Lesions ; Male ; Medical imaging ; Middle Aged ; Peripheral arterial occlusive disease ; Postprocessing ; Projection ; Radiology ; Readers ; Reading ; Retrospective Studies ; Sensitivity and Specificity ; Studies ; Three-dimensional reformations ; Tomography, X-Ray Computed - methods ; Veins & arteries ; Work stations</subject><ispartof>Clinical imaging, 2015-07, Vol.39 (4), p.603-607</ispartof><rights>Elsevier Inc.</rights><rights>2015 Elsevier Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier Limited 2015</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c587t-a1bdfdcbbdbe1b2a799010ef9bacd4dd215bd7fbbdbce035b851ee492f511453</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c587t-a1bdfdcbbdbe1b2a799010ef9bacd4dd215bd7fbbdbce035b851ee492f511453</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-6012-4337</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.clinimag.2015.03.005$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3548,27923,27924,45994</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25825345$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Schernthaner, Ruediger Egbert</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wolf, Florian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mistelbauer, Gabriel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Weber, Michael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sramek, Milos</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Groeller, Eduard</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Loewe, Christian</creatorcontrib><title>New hybrid reformations of peripheral CT angiography: do we still need axial images?</title><title>Clinical imaging</title><addtitle>Clin Imaging</addtitle><description>Abstract Purpose To quantify the detectability of peripheral artery stenosis on hybrid CT angiography (CTA) reformations. Methods Hybrid reformations were developed by combining multipath curved planar reformations (mpCPR) and maximum intensity projections (MIP). Fifty peripheral CTAs were evaluated twice: either with MIP, mpCPR and axial images or with hybrid reformations only. Digital subtraction angiography served as gold standard. Results Using hybrid reformations, two independent readers detected 88.0% and 81.3% of significant stenosis, respectively. However, CTA including axial images detected statistically significant more lesions (98%). Conclusion Peripheral CTA reading including axial images is still recommended. Further improvement of these hybrid reformations is necessary.</description><subject>Accuracy</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Angiography</subject><subject>Angiography, Digital Subtraction - methods</subject><subject>Arterial Occlusive Diseases - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Calcification</subject><subject>Constriction, Pathologic - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>CT angiography</subject><subject>Digital</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Image detection</subject><subject>Lesions</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical imaging</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Peripheral arterial occlusive disease</subject><subject>Postprocessing</subject><subject>Projection</subject><subject>Radiology</subject><subject>Readers</subject><subject>Reading</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Sensitivity and Specificity</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Three-dimensional reformations</subject><subject>Tomography, X-Ray Computed - methods</subject><subject>Veins & arteries</subject><subject>Work stations</subject><issn>0899-7071</issn><issn>1873-4499</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkk9v1DAQxS0EotvCV6gsceGSMHbi2ObAH60oIFVwYO-WY092vWSTYO9S9tvjsC1IvZSTD_N7M573hpBLBiUD1rzalq4PQ9jZdcmBiRKqEkA8IgumZFXUtdaPyQKU1oUEyc7IeUpbyEJdy6fkjAvFRVWLBVl9wRu6ObYxeBqxG-PO7sM4JDp2dMIYpg1G29PlitphHcZ1tNPm-Jr6kd4gTfvQ93RA9NT-Chmb_4Pp7TPypLN9wue37wVZXX1YLT8V118_fl6-vy6cUHJfWNb6zru29S2yllupNTDATrfW-dp7zkTrZTfXHUIlWiUYYq15JxirRXVBXp7aTnH8ccC0N7uQHPa9HXA8JMOkVMBlA_o_UME4q7mqHkYbpQAakE1GX9xDt-MhDnnlmZKgZK3m2c2JcnFMKZtsppiNikfDwMxhmq25C9PMYRqoTA4zCy9v2x_aHfq_srv0MvDuBGA2-WfAaJILODj0IaLbGz-Gh2e8udfiD-Zs_x2PmP7tYxI3YL7NJzVfFBOQTWh49RsGsMgI</recordid><startdate>20150701</startdate><enddate>20150701</enddate><creator>Schernthaner, Ruediger Egbert</creator><creator>Wolf, Florian</creator><creator>Mistelbauer, Gabriel</creator><creator>Weber, Michael</creator><creator>Sramek, Milos</creator><creator>Groeller, Eduard</creator><creator>Loewe, Christian</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>Elsevier Limited</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M7Z</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7U5</scope><scope>L7M</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6012-4337</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20150701</creationdate><title>New hybrid reformations of peripheral CT angiography: do we still need axial images?</title><author>Schernthaner, Ruediger Egbert ; Wolf, Florian ; Mistelbauer, Gabriel ; Weber, Michael ; Sramek, Milos ; Groeller, Eduard ; Loewe, Christian</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c587t-a1bdfdcbbdbe1b2a799010ef9bacd4dd215bd7fbbdbce035b851ee492f511453</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Accuracy</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Angiography</topic><topic>Angiography, Digital Subtraction - methods</topic><topic>Arterial Occlusive Diseases - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Calcification</topic><topic>Constriction, Pathologic - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>CT angiography</topic><topic>Digital</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Image detection</topic><topic>Lesions</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical imaging</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Peripheral arterial occlusive disease</topic><topic>Postprocessing</topic><topic>Projection</topic><topic>Radiology</topic><topic>Readers</topic><topic>Reading</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Sensitivity and Specificity</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Three-dimensional reformations</topic><topic>Tomography, X-Ray Computed - methods</topic><topic>Veins & arteries</topic><topic>Work stations</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Schernthaner, Ruediger Egbert</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wolf, Florian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mistelbauer, Gabriel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Weber, Michael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sramek, Milos</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Groeller, Eduard</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Loewe, Christian</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Biochemistry Abstracts 1</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Solid State and Superconductivity Abstracts</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><jtitle>Clinical imaging</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Schernthaner, Ruediger Egbert</au><au>Wolf, Florian</au><au>Mistelbauer, Gabriel</au><au>Weber, Michael</au><au>Sramek, Milos</au><au>Groeller, Eduard</au><au>Loewe, Christian</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>New hybrid reformations of peripheral CT angiography: do we still need axial images?</atitle><jtitle>Clinical imaging</jtitle><addtitle>Clin Imaging</addtitle><date>2015-07-01</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>39</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>603</spage><epage>607</epage><pages>603-607</pages><issn>0899-7071</issn><eissn>1873-4499</eissn><coden>CLIMEB</coden><abstract>Abstract Purpose To quantify the detectability of peripheral artery stenosis on hybrid CT angiography (CTA) reformations. Methods Hybrid reformations were developed by combining multipath curved planar reformations (mpCPR) and maximum intensity projections (MIP). Fifty peripheral CTAs were evaluated twice: either with MIP, mpCPR and axial images or with hybrid reformations only. Digital subtraction angiography served as gold standard. Results Using hybrid reformations, two independent readers detected 88.0% and 81.3% of significant stenosis, respectively. However, CTA including axial images detected statistically significant more lesions (98%). Conclusion Peripheral CTA reading including axial images is still recommended. Further improvement of these hybrid reformations is necessary.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>25825345</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.clinimag.2015.03.005</doi><tpages>5</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6012-4337</orcidid></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0899-7071 |
| ispartof | Clinical imaging, 2015-07, Vol.39 (4), p.603-607 |
| issn | 0899-7071 1873-4499 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1778027609 |
| source | MEDLINE; ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present) |
| subjects | Accuracy Adult Aged Aged, 80 and over Angiography Angiography, Digital Subtraction - methods Arterial Occlusive Diseases - diagnostic imaging Calcification Constriction, Pathologic - diagnostic imaging CT angiography Digital Female Humans Image detection Lesions Male Medical imaging Middle Aged Peripheral arterial occlusive disease Postprocessing Projection Radiology Readers Reading Retrospective Studies Sensitivity and Specificity Studies Three-dimensional reformations Tomography, X-Ray Computed - methods Veins & arteries Work stations |
| title | New hybrid reformations of peripheral CT angiography: do we still need axial images? |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-11T17%3A19%3A18IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=New%20hybrid%20reformations%20of%20peripheral%20CT%20angiography:%20do%20we%20still%20need%20axial%20images?&rft.jtitle=Clinical%20imaging&rft.au=Schernthaner,%20Ruediger%20Egbert&rft.date=2015-07-01&rft.volume=39&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=603&rft.epage=607&rft.pages=603-607&rft.issn=0899-7071&rft.eissn=1873-4499&rft.coden=CLIMEB&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.clinimag.2015.03.005&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3710164641%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1687087489&rft_id=info:pmid/25825345&rft_els_id=S0899707115000662&rfr_iscdi=true |