Development of Simple Processing for Deleting Undershooting Artifact Using the FBP Method ─Evaluation of Simulation Data
The undershooting artifact occurs using the filtered back projection (FBP) method. This artifact is influenced by a ramp filter. Thereby, the fall of the target accumulation and a deficit arise and it becomes a clinical problem. We developed a new image reconstruction method based on the FBP method...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Nippon Hōshasen Gijutsu Gakkai zasshi 2015-01, Vol.71 (3), p.201-207 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 207 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 201 |
container_title | Nippon Hōshasen Gijutsu Gakkai zasshi |
container_volume | 71 |
creator | Kita, Akinobu Onoguchi, Masahisa Sugimoto, Katsuya Tsuchida, Tatsurou Toi, Akiko Kishimoto, Takahiro Shimada, Masato Adachi, Toshiki |
description | The undershooting artifact occurs using the filtered back projection (FBP) method. This artifact is influenced by a ramp filter. Thereby, the fall of the target accumulation and a deficit arise and it becomes a clinical problem. We developed a new image reconstruction method based on the FBP method to delete the undershooting artifact of FBP. The image quality of the FBP method is equivalent to that obtained by an evaluation using a digital phantom. The two segmentation and ordinary FBP methods were evaluated in terms of hot contrast, cold contrast, coefficient of variation (%CV), and root mean square uncertainty (%RSMU). The two segmentation FBP method showed equivalent values of hot contrast, % CV, and% RSMU compared with those of the ordinary FBP method. With a threshold level value, cold contrast sharply changed. However, when the threshold level of the two segmentation FBP method was set as the proper value, 90% contrast was obtained. It is necessary to set a threshold level as a proper value using the two segmentation FBP methods. I thought that it can delete an artifact in a simple way, without impairing the image quality. However, it is an examination of only a digital phantom this time. Before using it clinically, one has to use and verify a real phantom. |
doi_str_mv | 10.6009/jjrt.2015_JSRT_71.3.201 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1778019666</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1705065060</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1631-954900bf53466b8e42058a061cb31320dda2a75f471c5be1dc49b9d4bdc06bef3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkc1Kw0AURgdRsGifwVm6Sb2T-UmyrNb6g6KoXQ-TyY2NpJk6MxV05UP4hD6Jje3CpXDhcuDwbQ4hRwxGCqA4eXnxcZQCk_r68eFJZ2zEe9whA5bnLBF5znfJALgqEsFB7pNhCE0JkIpcSCkH5GOCb9i65QK7SF1NH5vFskV6753Ftdo909p5OsEWYw-zrkIf5s790tjHpjY20tmvGedIp6f39Bbj3FX0--vz_M20KxMb1223V-2GJiaaQ7JXmzbgcPsPyGx6_nR2mdzcXVydjW8SyxRnSSFFAVDWkgulyhxFCjI3oJgtOeMpVJVJTSZrkTErS2SVFUVZVKKsLKgSa35Ajje7S-9eVxiiXjTBYtuaDt0qaJZlObBCKfUPFSSo9cFazTaq9S4Ej7Ve-mZh_LtmoPs2um-j_7bRvEf-A3MehnI</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1705065060</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Development of Simple Processing for Deleting Undershooting Artifact Using the FBP Method ─Evaluation of Simulation Data</title><source>EZB Electronic Journals Library</source><creator>Kita, Akinobu ; Onoguchi, Masahisa ; Sugimoto, Katsuya ; Tsuchida, Tatsurou ; Toi, Akiko ; Kishimoto, Takahiro ; Shimada, Masato ; Adachi, Toshiki</creator><creatorcontrib>Kita, Akinobu ; Onoguchi, Masahisa ; Sugimoto, Katsuya ; Tsuchida, Tatsurou ; Toi, Akiko ; Kishimoto, Takahiro ; Shimada, Masato ; Adachi, Toshiki</creatorcontrib><description>The undershooting artifact occurs using the filtered back projection (FBP) method. This artifact is influenced by a ramp filter. Thereby, the fall of the target accumulation and a deficit arise and it becomes a clinical problem. We developed a new image reconstruction method based on the FBP method to delete the undershooting artifact of FBP. The image quality of the FBP method is equivalent to that obtained by an evaluation using a digital phantom. The two segmentation and ordinary FBP methods were evaluated in terms of hot contrast, cold contrast, coefficient of variation (%CV), and root mean square uncertainty (%RSMU). The two segmentation FBP method showed equivalent values of hot contrast, % CV, and% RSMU compared with those of the ordinary FBP method. With a threshold level value, cold contrast sharply changed. However, when the threshold level of the two segmentation FBP method was set as the proper value, 90% contrast was obtained. It is necessary to set a threshold level as a proper value using the two segmentation FBP methods. I thought that it can delete an artifact in a simple way, without impairing the image quality. However, it is an examination of only a digital phantom this time. Before using it clinically, one has to use and verify a real phantom.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0369-4305</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1881-4883</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.6009/jjrt.2015_JSRT_71.3.201</identifier><language>eng</language><subject>Digital imaging ; Equivalence ; Image quality ; Ramps ; Segmentation ; Simulation ; Thresholds</subject><ispartof>Nippon Hōshasen Gijutsu Gakkai zasshi, 2015-01, Vol.71 (3), p.201-207</ispartof><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1631-954900bf53466b8e42058a061cb31320dda2a75f471c5be1dc49b9d4bdc06bef3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>315,781,785,4025,27925,27926,27927</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kita, Akinobu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Onoguchi, Masahisa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sugimoto, Katsuya</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tsuchida, Tatsurou</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Toi, Akiko</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kishimoto, Takahiro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shimada, Masato</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Adachi, Toshiki</creatorcontrib><title>Development of Simple Processing for Deleting Undershooting Artifact Using the FBP Method ─Evaluation of Simulation Data</title><title>Nippon Hōshasen Gijutsu Gakkai zasshi</title><description>The undershooting artifact occurs using the filtered back projection (FBP) method. This artifact is influenced by a ramp filter. Thereby, the fall of the target accumulation and a deficit arise and it becomes a clinical problem. We developed a new image reconstruction method based on the FBP method to delete the undershooting artifact of FBP. The image quality of the FBP method is equivalent to that obtained by an evaluation using a digital phantom. The two segmentation and ordinary FBP methods were evaluated in terms of hot contrast, cold contrast, coefficient of variation (%CV), and root mean square uncertainty (%RSMU). The two segmentation FBP method showed equivalent values of hot contrast, % CV, and% RSMU compared with those of the ordinary FBP method. With a threshold level value, cold contrast sharply changed. However, when the threshold level of the two segmentation FBP method was set as the proper value, 90% contrast was obtained. It is necessary to set a threshold level as a proper value using the two segmentation FBP methods. I thought that it can delete an artifact in a simple way, without impairing the image quality. However, it is an examination of only a digital phantom this time. Before using it clinically, one has to use and verify a real phantom.</description><subject>Digital imaging</subject><subject>Equivalence</subject><subject>Image quality</subject><subject>Ramps</subject><subject>Segmentation</subject><subject>Simulation</subject><subject>Thresholds</subject><issn>0369-4305</issn><issn>1881-4883</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNkc1Kw0AURgdRsGifwVm6Sb2T-UmyrNb6g6KoXQ-TyY2NpJk6MxV05UP4hD6Jje3CpXDhcuDwbQ4hRwxGCqA4eXnxcZQCk_r68eFJZ2zEe9whA5bnLBF5znfJALgqEsFB7pNhCE0JkIpcSCkH5GOCb9i65QK7SF1NH5vFskV6753Ftdo909p5OsEWYw-zrkIf5s790tjHpjY20tmvGedIp6f39Bbj3FX0--vz_M20KxMb1223V-2GJiaaQ7JXmzbgcPsPyGx6_nR2mdzcXVydjW8SyxRnSSFFAVDWkgulyhxFCjI3oJgtOeMpVJVJTSZrkTErS2SVFUVZVKKsLKgSa35Ajje7S-9eVxiiXjTBYtuaDt0qaJZlObBCKfUPFSSo9cFazTaq9S4Ej7Ve-mZh_LtmoPs2um-j_7bRvEf-A3MehnI</recordid><startdate>20150101</startdate><enddate>20150101</enddate><creator>Kita, Akinobu</creator><creator>Onoguchi, Masahisa</creator><creator>Sugimoto, Katsuya</creator><creator>Tsuchida, Tatsurou</creator><creator>Toi, Akiko</creator><creator>Kishimoto, Takahiro</creator><creator>Shimada, Masato</creator><creator>Adachi, Toshiki</creator><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>7SC</scope><scope>7U5</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>L~C</scope><scope>L~D</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20150101</creationdate><title>Development of Simple Processing for Deleting Undershooting Artifact Using the FBP Method ─Evaluation of Simulation Data</title><author>Kita, Akinobu ; Onoguchi, Masahisa ; Sugimoto, Katsuya ; Tsuchida, Tatsurou ; Toi, Akiko ; Kishimoto, Takahiro ; Shimada, Masato ; Adachi, Toshiki</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1631-954900bf53466b8e42058a061cb31320dda2a75f471c5be1dc49b9d4bdc06bef3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Digital imaging</topic><topic>Equivalence</topic><topic>Image quality</topic><topic>Ramps</topic><topic>Segmentation</topic><topic>Simulation</topic><topic>Thresholds</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kita, Akinobu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Onoguchi, Masahisa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sugimoto, Katsuya</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tsuchida, Tatsurou</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Toi, Akiko</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kishimoto, Takahiro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shimada, Masato</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Adachi, Toshiki</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts</collection><collection>Solid State and Superconductivity Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Academic</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Professional</collection><jtitle>Nippon Hōshasen Gijutsu Gakkai zasshi</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kita, Akinobu</au><au>Onoguchi, Masahisa</au><au>Sugimoto, Katsuya</au><au>Tsuchida, Tatsurou</au><au>Toi, Akiko</au><au>Kishimoto, Takahiro</au><au>Shimada, Masato</au><au>Adachi, Toshiki</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Development of Simple Processing for Deleting Undershooting Artifact Using the FBP Method ─Evaluation of Simulation Data</atitle><jtitle>Nippon Hōshasen Gijutsu Gakkai zasshi</jtitle><date>2015-01-01</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>71</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>201</spage><epage>207</epage><pages>201-207</pages><issn>0369-4305</issn><eissn>1881-4883</eissn><abstract>The undershooting artifact occurs using the filtered back projection (FBP) method. This artifact is influenced by a ramp filter. Thereby, the fall of the target accumulation and a deficit arise and it becomes a clinical problem. We developed a new image reconstruction method based on the FBP method to delete the undershooting artifact of FBP. The image quality of the FBP method is equivalent to that obtained by an evaluation using a digital phantom. The two segmentation and ordinary FBP methods were evaluated in terms of hot contrast, cold contrast, coefficient of variation (%CV), and root mean square uncertainty (%RSMU). The two segmentation FBP method showed equivalent values of hot contrast, % CV, and% RSMU compared with those of the ordinary FBP method. With a threshold level value, cold contrast sharply changed. However, when the threshold level of the two segmentation FBP method was set as the proper value, 90% contrast was obtained. It is necessary to set a threshold level as a proper value using the two segmentation FBP methods. I thought that it can delete an artifact in a simple way, without impairing the image quality. However, it is an examination of only a digital phantom this time. Before using it clinically, one has to use and verify a real phantom.</abstract><doi>10.6009/jjrt.2015_JSRT_71.3.201</doi><tpages>7</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0369-4305 |
ispartof | Nippon Hōshasen Gijutsu Gakkai zasshi, 2015-01, Vol.71 (3), p.201-207 |
issn | 0369-4305 1881-4883 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1778019666 |
source | EZB Electronic Journals Library |
subjects | Digital imaging Equivalence Image quality Ramps Segmentation Simulation Thresholds |
title | Development of Simple Processing for Deleting Undershooting Artifact Using the FBP Method ─Evaluation of Simulation Data |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-17T17%3A44%3A35IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Development%20of%20Simple%20Processing%20for%20Deleting%20Undershooting%20Artifact%20Using%20the%20FBP%20Method%20%E2%94%80Evaluation%20of%20Simulation%20Data&rft.jtitle=Nippon%20Ho%CC%84shasen%20Gijutsu%20Gakkai%20zasshi&rft.au=Kita,%20Akinobu&rft.date=2015-01-01&rft.volume=71&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=201&rft.epage=207&rft.pages=201-207&rft.issn=0369-4305&rft.eissn=1881-4883&rft_id=info:doi/10.6009/jjrt.2015_JSRT_71.3.201&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1705065060%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1705065060&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |