Development of Simple Processing for Deleting Undershooting Artifact Using the FBP Method ─Evaluation of Simulation Data

The undershooting artifact occurs using the filtered back projection (FBP) method. This artifact is influenced by a ramp filter. Thereby, the fall of the target accumulation and a deficit arise and it becomes a clinical problem. We developed a new image reconstruction method based on the FBP method...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Nippon Hōshasen Gijutsu Gakkai zasshi 2015-01, Vol.71 (3), p.201-207
Hauptverfasser: Kita, Akinobu, Onoguchi, Masahisa, Sugimoto, Katsuya, Tsuchida, Tatsurou, Toi, Akiko, Kishimoto, Takahiro, Shimada, Masato, Adachi, Toshiki
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 207
container_issue 3
container_start_page 201
container_title Nippon Hōshasen Gijutsu Gakkai zasshi
container_volume 71
creator Kita, Akinobu
Onoguchi, Masahisa
Sugimoto, Katsuya
Tsuchida, Tatsurou
Toi, Akiko
Kishimoto, Takahiro
Shimada, Masato
Adachi, Toshiki
description The undershooting artifact occurs using the filtered back projection (FBP) method. This artifact is influenced by a ramp filter. Thereby, the fall of the target accumulation and a deficit arise and it becomes a clinical problem. We developed a new image reconstruction method based on the FBP method to delete the undershooting artifact of FBP. The image quality of the FBP method is equivalent to that obtained by an evaluation using a digital phantom. The two segmentation and ordinary FBP methods were evaluated in terms of hot contrast, cold contrast, coefficient of variation (%CV), and root mean square uncertainty (%RSMU). The two segmentation FBP method showed equivalent values of hot contrast, % CV, and% RSMU compared with those of the ordinary FBP method. With a threshold level value, cold contrast sharply changed. However, when the threshold level of the two segmentation FBP method was set as the proper value, 90% contrast was obtained. It is necessary to set a threshold level as a proper value using the two segmentation FBP methods. I thought that it can delete an artifact in a simple way, without impairing the image quality. However, it is an examination of only a digital phantom this time. Before using it clinically, one has to use and verify a real phantom.
doi_str_mv 10.6009/jjrt.2015_JSRT_71.3.201
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1778019666</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1705065060</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1631-954900bf53466b8e42058a061cb31320dda2a75f471c5be1dc49b9d4bdc06bef3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkc1Kw0AURgdRsGifwVm6Sb2T-UmyrNb6g6KoXQ-TyY2NpJk6MxV05UP4hD6Jje3CpXDhcuDwbQ4hRwxGCqA4eXnxcZQCk_r68eFJZ2zEe9whA5bnLBF5znfJALgqEsFB7pNhCE0JkIpcSCkH5GOCb9i65QK7SF1NH5vFskV6753Ftdo909p5OsEWYw-zrkIf5s790tjHpjY20tmvGedIp6f39Bbj3FX0--vz_M20KxMb1223V-2GJiaaQ7JXmzbgcPsPyGx6_nR2mdzcXVydjW8SyxRnSSFFAVDWkgulyhxFCjI3oJgtOeMpVJVJTSZrkTErS2SVFUVZVKKsLKgSa35Ajje7S-9eVxiiXjTBYtuaDt0qaJZlObBCKfUPFSSo9cFazTaq9S4Ej7Ve-mZh_LtmoPs2um-j_7bRvEf-A3MehnI</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1705065060</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Development of Simple Processing for Deleting Undershooting Artifact Using the FBP Method ─Evaluation of Simulation Data</title><source>EZB Electronic Journals Library</source><creator>Kita, Akinobu ; Onoguchi, Masahisa ; Sugimoto, Katsuya ; Tsuchida, Tatsurou ; Toi, Akiko ; Kishimoto, Takahiro ; Shimada, Masato ; Adachi, Toshiki</creator><creatorcontrib>Kita, Akinobu ; Onoguchi, Masahisa ; Sugimoto, Katsuya ; Tsuchida, Tatsurou ; Toi, Akiko ; Kishimoto, Takahiro ; Shimada, Masato ; Adachi, Toshiki</creatorcontrib><description>The undershooting artifact occurs using the filtered back projection (FBP) method. This artifact is influenced by a ramp filter. Thereby, the fall of the target accumulation and a deficit arise and it becomes a clinical problem. We developed a new image reconstruction method based on the FBP method to delete the undershooting artifact of FBP. The image quality of the FBP method is equivalent to that obtained by an evaluation using a digital phantom. The two segmentation and ordinary FBP methods were evaluated in terms of hot contrast, cold contrast, coefficient of variation (%CV), and root mean square uncertainty (%RSMU). The two segmentation FBP method showed equivalent values of hot contrast, % CV, and% RSMU compared with those of the ordinary FBP method. With a threshold level value, cold contrast sharply changed. However, when the threshold level of the two segmentation FBP method was set as the proper value, 90% contrast was obtained. It is necessary to set a threshold level as a proper value using the two segmentation FBP methods. I thought that it can delete an artifact in a simple way, without impairing the image quality. However, it is an examination of only a digital phantom this time. Before using it clinically, one has to use and verify a real phantom.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0369-4305</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1881-4883</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.6009/jjrt.2015_JSRT_71.3.201</identifier><language>eng</language><subject>Digital imaging ; Equivalence ; Image quality ; Ramps ; Segmentation ; Simulation ; Thresholds</subject><ispartof>Nippon Hōshasen Gijutsu Gakkai zasshi, 2015-01, Vol.71 (3), p.201-207</ispartof><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1631-954900bf53466b8e42058a061cb31320dda2a75f471c5be1dc49b9d4bdc06bef3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>315,781,785,4025,27925,27926,27927</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kita, Akinobu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Onoguchi, Masahisa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sugimoto, Katsuya</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tsuchida, Tatsurou</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Toi, Akiko</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kishimoto, Takahiro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shimada, Masato</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Adachi, Toshiki</creatorcontrib><title>Development of Simple Processing for Deleting Undershooting Artifact Using the FBP Method ─Evaluation of Simulation Data</title><title>Nippon Hōshasen Gijutsu Gakkai zasshi</title><description>The undershooting artifact occurs using the filtered back projection (FBP) method. This artifact is influenced by a ramp filter. Thereby, the fall of the target accumulation and a deficit arise and it becomes a clinical problem. We developed a new image reconstruction method based on the FBP method to delete the undershooting artifact of FBP. The image quality of the FBP method is equivalent to that obtained by an evaluation using a digital phantom. The two segmentation and ordinary FBP methods were evaluated in terms of hot contrast, cold contrast, coefficient of variation (%CV), and root mean square uncertainty (%RSMU). The two segmentation FBP method showed equivalent values of hot contrast, % CV, and% RSMU compared with those of the ordinary FBP method. With a threshold level value, cold contrast sharply changed. However, when the threshold level of the two segmentation FBP method was set as the proper value, 90% contrast was obtained. It is necessary to set a threshold level as a proper value using the two segmentation FBP methods. I thought that it can delete an artifact in a simple way, without impairing the image quality. However, it is an examination of only a digital phantom this time. Before using it clinically, one has to use and verify a real phantom.</description><subject>Digital imaging</subject><subject>Equivalence</subject><subject>Image quality</subject><subject>Ramps</subject><subject>Segmentation</subject><subject>Simulation</subject><subject>Thresholds</subject><issn>0369-4305</issn><issn>1881-4883</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNkc1Kw0AURgdRsGifwVm6Sb2T-UmyrNb6g6KoXQ-TyY2NpJk6MxV05UP4hD6Jje3CpXDhcuDwbQ4hRwxGCqA4eXnxcZQCk_r68eFJZ2zEe9whA5bnLBF5znfJALgqEsFB7pNhCE0JkIpcSCkH5GOCb9i65QK7SF1NH5vFskV6753Ftdo909p5OsEWYw-zrkIf5s790tjHpjY20tmvGedIp6f39Bbj3FX0--vz_M20KxMb1223V-2GJiaaQ7JXmzbgcPsPyGx6_nR2mdzcXVydjW8SyxRnSSFFAVDWkgulyhxFCjI3oJgtOeMpVJVJTSZrkTErS2SVFUVZVKKsLKgSa35Ajje7S-9eVxiiXjTBYtuaDt0qaJZlObBCKfUPFSSo9cFazTaq9S4Ej7Ve-mZh_LtmoPs2um-j_7bRvEf-A3MehnI</recordid><startdate>20150101</startdate><enddate>20150101</enddate><creator>Kita, Akinobu</creator><creator>Onoguchi, Masahisa</creator><creator>Sugimoto, Katsuya</creator><creator>Tsuchida, Tatsurou</creator><creator>Toi, Akiko</creator><creator>Kishimoto, Takahiro</creator><creator>Shimada, Masato</creator><creator>Adachi, Toshiki</creator><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>7SC</scope><scope>7U5</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>L~C</scope><scope>L~D</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20150101</creationdate><title>Development of Simple Processing for Deleting Undershooting Artifact Using the FBP Method ─Evaluation of Simulation Data</title><author>Kita, Akinobu ; Onoguchi, Masahisa ; Sugimoto, Katsuya ; Tsuchida, Tatsurou ; Toi, Akiko ; Kishimoto, Takahiro ; Shimada, Masato ; Adachi, Toshiki</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1631-954900bf53466b8e42058a061cb31320dda2a75f471c5be1dc49b9d4bdc06bef3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Digital imaging</topic><topic>Equivalence</topic><topic>Image quality</topic><topic>Ramps</topic><topic>Segmentation</topic><topic>Simulation</topic><topic>Thresholds</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kita, Akinobu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Onoguchi, Masahisa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sugimoto, Katsuya</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tsuchida, Tatsurou</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Toi, Akiko</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kishimoto, Takahiro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shimada, Masato</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Adachi, Toshiki</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts</collection><collection>Solid State and Superconductivity Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts – Academic</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Professional</collection><jtitle>Nippon Hōshasen Gijutsu Gakkai zasshi</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kita, Akinobu</au><au>Onoguchi, Masahisa</au><au>Sugimoto, Katsuya</au><au>Tsuchida, Tatsurou</au><au>Toi, Akiko</au><au>Kishimoto, Takahiro</au><au>Shimada, Masato</au><au>Adachi, Toshiki</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Development of Simple Processing for Deleting Undershooting Artifact Using the FBP Method ─Evaluation of Simulation Data</atitle><jtitle>Nippon Hōshasen Gijutsu Gakkai zasshi</jtitle><date>2015-01-01</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>71</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>201</spage><epage>207</epage><pages>201-207</pages><issn>0369-4305</issn><eissn>1881-4883</eissn><abstract>The undershooting artifact occurs using the filtered back projection (FBP) method. This artifact is influenced by a ramp filter. Thereby, the fall of the target accumulation and a deficit arise and it becomes a clinical problem. We developed a new image reconstruction method based on the FBP method to delete the undershooting artifact of FBP. The image quality of the FBP method is equivalent to that obtained by an evaluation using a digital phantom. The two segmentation and ordinary FBP methods were evaluated in terms of hot contrast, cold contrast, coefficient of variation (%CV), and root mean square uncertainty (%RSMU). The two segmentation FBP method showed equivalent values of hot contrast, % CV, and% RSMU compared with those of the ordinary FBP method. With a threshold level value, cold contrast sharply changed. However, when the threshold level of the two segmentation FBP method was set as the proper value, 90% contrast was obtained. It is necessary to set a threshold level as a proper value using the two segmentation FBP methods. I thought that it can delete an artifact in a simple way, without impairing the image quality. However, it is an examination of only a digital phantom this time. Before using it clinically, one has to use and verify a real phantom.</abstract><doi>10.6009/jjrt.2015_JSRT_71.3.201</doi><tpages>7</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0369-4305
ispartof Nippon Hōshasen Gijutsu Gakkai zasshi, 2015-01, Vol.71 (3), p.201-207
issn 0369-4305
1881-4883
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1778019666
source EZB Electronic Journals Library
subjects Digital imaging
Equivalence
Image quality
Ramps
Segmentation
Simulation
Thresholds
title Development of Simple Processing for Deleting Undershooting Artifact Using the FBP Method ─Evaluation of Simulation Data
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-17T17%3A44%3A35IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Development%20of%20Simple%20Processing%20for%20Deleting%20Undershooting%20Artifact%20Using%20the%20FBP%20Method%20%E2%94%80Evaluation%20of%20Simulation%20Data&rft.jtitle=Nippon%20Ho%CC%84shasen%20Gijutsu%20Gakkai%20zasshi&rft.au=Kita,%20Akinobu&rft.date=2015-01-01&rft.volume=71&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=201&rft.epage=207&rft.pages=201-207&rft.issn=0369-4305&rft.eissn=1881-4883&rft_id=info:doi/10.6009/jjrt.2015_JSRT_71.3.201&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1705065060%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1705065060&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true