Assessing the potential for forest management practitioner participation in climate change adaptation

•Forest management practitioners have a fundamental role in adaptation.•Understanding manager perceptions of constraints supports adaptation policy.•Most forest managers support adaptation however, a significant minority do not.•Adaptation barriers include knowledge, mandates, resources, and institu...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Forest ecology and management 2016-01, Vol.360, p.388-399
Hauptverfasser: Nelson, Harry W., Williamson, Tim B., Macaulay, Casey, Mahony, Colin
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 399
container_issue
container_start_page 388
container_title Forest ecology and management
container_volume 360
creator Nelson, Harry W.
Williamson, Tim B.
Macaulay, Casey
Mahony, Colin
description •Forest management practitioners have a fundamental role in adaptation.•Understanding manager perceptions of constraints supports adaptation policy.•Most forest managers support adaptation however, a significant minority do not.•Adaptation barriers include knowledge, mandates, resources, and institutions.•Assessment, planning, and monitoring need to incorporate climate change. The sensitivity of forests to local climate and the long time periods involved in forest management combine to result in conditions where forests and forest management are vulnerable to climate change. Minimizing the risks and impacts of climate change on forest management outcomes and reducing the vulnerability of forest management systems requires adaptation. Forest management system adaptation is a multi-scale incremental process that involves diverse actors collaborating to define issues, develop options, and implement solutions. Enabling adaptation may require revising assumptions (e.g., assumptions about stationary climate), upgrading formal and informal institutions (including mandates), re-engineering governance, addressing knowledge gaps and information management issues, and changing practices. Given the heightened uncertainty associated with climate change, adaptation also includes enhancing capacities, reducing risks through diversification, increasing flexibility, and enhancing resiliency by creating decision environments conducive to learning, foresight, knowledge integration, and adaptive management. Forest management practitioners have a fundamental role in identifying, evaluating, and implementing climate change adaptation measures. This study develops and applies a framework (derived from recent scholarship on adaptation) for assessing the perceptions of forest management practitioners about issues, challenges, and factors that they consider important relative to their potential to contribute to climate change adaptation. The framework draws from, and ties together various aspects of adaptation process including psychological factors, knowledge management, forest management capacity, institutions and governance, and the state of information methods that support forest management (i.e., planning, monitoring, and assessment). The framework is applied utilizing the results of surveys of forest practitioners in British Columbia, Canada. The application provides an opportunity to test concepts and to identify key barriers from a practitioner perspective. Proof of concept
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.foreco.2015.09.038
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1778004482</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0378112715005332</els_id><sourcerecordid>1753479348</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c372t-3d20c7931f5087e04e319089002130d45970e22a9eda6e25a11b30b165f6b8f63</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNUctqwzAQFKWFpo8_6EHHXuyuHrbkSyGEviDQS3sWirxOFBzblZRC_75K03PpYVmWmR1mGEJuGJQMWH23LbsxoBtLDqwqoSlB6BMyY1rxQoHkp2QGQumCMa7OyUWMWwCoKqlnBOcxYox-WNO0QTqNCYfkbU-z4mEwJrqzg13jLgN0CtYln_w4YKCTDck7P9nDTf1AXe93NiF1GzuskdrWTukHvCJnne0jXv_uS_L--PC2eC6Wr08vi_mycELxVIiWg1ONYF0FWiFIFKwB3QBwJqCVVaMAObcNtrZGXlnGVgJWrK66eqW7WlyS26PuFMaPffZudj467Hs74LiPhimlAaTU_B_USsjsRepMlUeqC2OMATszhRw0fBkG5lCA2ZpjAeZQgIHG5ALy2_3xDXPiT4_BROdxcNj6zE2mHf3fAt-ixpFS</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1753479348</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Assessing the potential for forest management practitioner participation in climate change adaptation</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Nelson, Harry W. ; Williamson, Tim B. ; Macaulay, Casey ; Mahony, Colin</creator><creatorcontrib>Nelson, Harry W. ; Williamson, Tim B. ; Macaulay, Casey ; Mahony, Colin</creatorcontrib><description>•Forest management practitioners have a fundamental role in adaptation.•Understanding manager perceptions of constraints supports adaptation policy.•Most forest managers support adaptation however, a significant minority do not.•Adaptation barriers include knowledge, mandates, resources, and institutions.•Assessment, planning, and monitoring need to incorporate climate change. The sensitivity of forests to local climate and the long time periods involved in forest management combine to result in conditions where forests and forest management are vulnerable to climate change. Minimizing the risks and impacts of climate change on forest management outcomes and reducing the vulnerability of forest management systems requires adaptation. Forest management system adaptation is a multi-scale incremental process that involves diverse actors collaborating to define issues, develop options, and implement solutions. Enabling adaptation may require revising assumptions (e.g., assumptions about stationary climate), upgrading formal and informal institutions (including mandates), re-engineering governance, addressing knowledge gaps and information management issues, and changing practices. Given the heightened uncertainty associated with climate change, adaptation also includes enhancing capacities, reducing risks through diversification, increasing flexibility, and enhancing resiliency by creating decision environments conducive to learning, foresight, knowledge integration, and adaptive management. Forest management practitioners have a fundamental role in identifying, evaluating, and implementing climate change adaptation measures. This study develops and applies a framework (derived from recent scholarship on adaptation) for assessing the perceptions of forest management practitioners about issues, challenges, and factors that they consider important relative to their potential to contribute to climate change adaptation. The framework draws from, and ties together various aspects of adaptation process including psychological factors, knowledge management, forest management capacity, institutions and governance, and the state of information methods that support forest management (i.e., planning, monitoring, and assessment). The framework is applied utilizing the results of surveys of forest practitioners in British Columbia, Canada. The application provides an opportunity to test concepts and to identify key barriers from a practitioner perspective. Proof of concept is tested by evaluating the extent to which respondents were able and willing to provide answers to survey questions. In general, responses were robust suggesting some understanding and recognition of the importance and validity of the underlying adaptation concepts by forest professionals. The results suggest that forest professionals have diverse viewpoints about climate change. The majority is concerned and support adaptation. However, a significant minority do not support modification of current forest management. Discourse, education, and engagement are called for. Other key factors that from the perspective of professionals may reduce participation potential include knowledge deficits, lack of mandate to adapt, limited resources for adaptation, institutional barriers, inadequate assessment, and persistence of planning and monitoring approaches that do not account for climate change.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0378-1127</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1872-7042</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.foreco.2015.09.038</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Adaptation ; Adaptation potential ; Adaptive capacity ; Adaptive management ; Assessment ; Assessments ; Awareness ; Barriers ; Beliefs ; Climate change ; Forest management ; Forest management practitioners ; Forests ; Human capital ; Institutions ; Knowledge ; Learning ; Management ; Monitoring ; Partnerships ; Perceptions ; Planning ; Risk</subject><ispartof>Forest ecology and management, 2016-01, Vol.360, p.388-399</ispartof><rights>2015 Elsevier B.V.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c372t-3d20c7931f5087e04e319089002130d45970e22a9eda6e25a11b30b165f6b8f63</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c372t-3d20c7931f5087e04e319089002130d45970e22a9eda6e25a11b30b165f6b8f63</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2015.09.038$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,3537,27905,27906,45976</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Nelson, Harry W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Williamson, Tim B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Macaulay, Casey</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mahony, Colin</creatorcontrib><title>Assessing the potential for forest management practitioner participation in climate change adaptation</title><title>Forest ecology and management</title><description>•Forest management practitioners have a fundamental role in adaptation.•Understanding manager perceptions of constraints supports adaptation policy.•Most forest managers support adaptation however, a significant minority do not.•Adaptation barriers include knowledge, mandates, resources, and institutions.•Assessment, planning, and monitoring need to incorporate climate change. The sensitivity of forests to local climate and the long time periods involved in forest management combine to result in conditions where forests and forest management are vulnerable to climate change. Minimizing the risks and impacts of climate change on forest management outcomes and reducing the vulnerability of forest management systems requires adaptation. Forest management system adaptation is a multi-scale incremental process that involves diverse actors collaborating to define issues, develop options, and implement solutions. Enabling adaptation may require revising assumptions (e.g., assumptions about stationary climate), upgrading formal and informal institutions (including mandates), re-engineering governance, addressing knowledge gaps and information management issues, and changing practices. Given the heightened uncertainty associated with climate change, adaptation also includes enhancing capacities, reducing risks through diversification, increasing flexibility, and enhancing resiliency by creating decision environments conducive to learning, foresight, knowledge integration, and adaptive management. Forest management practitioners have a fundamental role in identifying, evaluating, and implementing climate change adaptation measures. This study develops and applies a framework (derived from recent scholarship on adaptation) for assessing the perceptions of forest management practitioners about issues, challenges, and factors that they consider important relative to their potential to contribute to climate change adaptation. The framework draws from, and ties together various aspects of adaptation process including psychological factors, knowledge management, forest management capacity, institutions and governance, and the state of information methods that support forest management (i.e., planning, monitoring, and assessment). The framework is applied utilizing the results of surveys of forest practitioners in British Columbia, Canada. The application provides an opportunity to test concepts and to identify key barriers from a practitioner perspective. Proof of concept is tested by evaluating the extent to which respondents were able and willing to provide answers to survey questions. In general, responses were robust suggesting some understanding and recognition of the importance and validity of the underlying adaptation concepts by forest professionals. The results suggest that forest professionals have diverse viewpoints about climate change. The majority is concerned and support adaptation. However, a significant minority do not support modification of current forest management. Discourse, education, and engagement are called for. Other key factors that from the perspective of professionals may reduce participation potential include knowledge deficits, lack of mandate to adapt, limited resources for adaptation, institutional barriers, inadequate assessment, and persistence of planning and monitoring approaches that do not account for climate change.</description><subject>Adaptation</subject><subject>Adaptation potential</subject><subject>Adaptive capacity</subject><subject>Adaptive management</subject><subject>Assessment</subject><subject>Assessments</subject><subject>Awareness</subject><subject>Barriers</subject><subject>Beliefs</subject><subject>Climate change</subject><subject>Forest management</subject><subject>Forest management practitioners</subject><subject>Forests</subject><subject>Human capital</subject><subject>Institutions</subject><subject>Knowledge</subject><subject>Learning</subject><subject>Management</subject><subject>Monitoring</subject><subject>Partnerships</subject><subject>Perceptions</subject><subject>Planning</subject><subject>Risk</subject><issn>0378-1127</issn><issn>1872-7042</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNUctqwzAQFKWFpo8_6EHHXuyuHrbkSyGEviDQS3sWirxOFBzblZRC_75K03PpYVmWmR1mGEJuGJQMWH23LbsxoBtLDqwqoSlB6BMyY1rxQoHkp2QGQumCMa7OyUWMWwCoKqlnBOcxYox-WNO0QTqNCYfkbU-z4mEwJrqzg13jLgN0CtYln_w4YKCTDck7P9nDTf1AXe93NiF1GzuskdrWTukHvCJnne0jXv_uS_L--PC2eC6Wr08vi_mycELxVIiWg1ONYF0FWiFIFKwB3QBwJqCVVaMAObcNtrZGXlnGVgJWrK66eqW7WlyS26PuFMaPffZudj467Hs74LiPhimlAaTU_B_USsjsRepMlUeqC2OMATszhRw0fBkG5lCA2ZpjAeZQgIHG5ALy2_3xDXPiT4_BROdxcNj6zE2mHf3fAt-ixpFS</recordid><startdate>20160115</startdate><enddate>20160115</enddate><creator>Nelson, Harry W.</creator><creator>Williamson, Tim B.</creator><creator>Macaulay, Casey</creator><creator>Mahony, Colin</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7U6</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>KR7</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20160115</creationdate><title>Assessing the potential for forest management practitioner participation in climate change adaptation</title><author>Nelson, Harry W. ; Williamson, Tim B. ; Macaulay, Casey ; Mahony, Colin</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c372t-3d20c7931f5087e04e319089002130d45970e22a9eda6e25a11b30b165f6b8f63</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Adaptation</topic><topic>Adaptation potential</topic><topic>Adaptive capacity</topic><topic>Adaptive management</topic><topic>Assessment</topic><topic>Assessments</topic><topic>Awareness</topic><topic>Barriers</topic><topic>Beliefs</topic><topic>Climate change</topic><topic>Forest management</topic><topic>Forest management practitioners</topic><topic>Forests</topic><topic>Human capital</topic><topic>Institutions</topic><topic>Knowledge</topic><topic>Learning</topic><topic>Management</topic><topic>Monitoring</topic><topic>Partnerships</topic><topic>Perceptions</topic><topic>Planning</topic><topic>Risk</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Nelson, Harry W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Williamson, Tim B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Macaulay, Casey</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mahony, Colin</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Sustainability Science Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Forest ecology and management</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Nelson, Harry W.</au><au>Williamson, Tim B.</au><au>Macaulay, Casey</au><au>Mahony, Colin</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Assessing the potential for forest management practitioner participation in climate change adaptation</atitle><jtitle>Forest ecology and management</jtitle><date>2016-01-15</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>360</volume><spage>388</spage><epage>399</epage><pages>388-399</pages><issn>0378-1127</issn><eissn>1872-7042</eissn><abstract>•Forest management practitioners have a fundamental role in adaptation.•Understanding manager perceptions of constraints supports adaptation policy.•Most forest managers support adaptation however, a significant minority do not.•Adaptation barriers include knowledge, mandates, resources, and institutions.•Assessment, planning, and monitoring need to incorporate climate change. The sensitivity of forests to local climate and the long time periods involved in forest management combine to result in conditions where forests and forest management are vulnerable to climate change. Minimizing the risks and impacts of climate change on forest management outcomes and reducing the vulnerability of forest management systems requires adaptation. Forest management system adaptation is a multi-scale incremental process that involves diverse actors collaborating to define issues, develop options, and implement solutions. Enabling adaptation may require revising assumptions (e.g., assumptions about stationary climate), upgrading formal and informal institutions (including mandates), re-engineering governance, addressing knowledge gaps and information management issues, and changing practices. Given the heightened uncertainty associated with climate change, adaptation also includes enhancing capacities, reducing risks through diversification, increasing flexibility, and enhancing resiliency by creating decision environments conducive to learning, foresight, knowledge integration, and adaptive management. Forest management practitioners have a fundamental role in identifying, evaluating, and implementing climate change adaptation measures. This study develops and applies a framework (derived from recent scholarship on adaptation) for assessing the perceptions of forest management practitioners about issues, challenges, and factors that they consider important relative to their potential to contribute to climate change adaptation. The framework draws from, and ties together various aspects of adaptation process including psychological factors, knowledge management, forest management capacity, institutions and governance, and the state of information methods that support forest management (i.e., planning, monitoring, and assessment). The framework is applied utilizing the results of surveys of forest practitioners in British Columbia, Canada. The application provides an opportunity to test concepts and to identify key barriers from a practitioner perspective. Proof of concept is tested by evaluating the extent to which respondents were able and willing to provide answers to survey questions. In general, responses were robust suggesting some understanding and recognition of the importance and validity of the underlying adaptation concepts by forest professionals. The results suggest that forest professionals have diverse viewpoints about climate change. The majority is concerned and support adaptation. However, a significant minority do not support modification of current forest management. Discourse, education, and engagement are called for. Other key factors that from the perspective of professionals may reduce participation potential include knowledge deficits, lack of mandate to adapt, limited resources for adaptation, institutional barriers, inadequate assessment, and persistence of planning and monitoring approaches that do not account for climate change.</abstract><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><doi>10.1016/j.foreco.2015.09.038</doi><tpages>12</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0378-1127
ispartof Forest ecology and management, 2016-01, Vol.360, p.388-399
issn 0378-1127
1872-7042
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1778004482
source Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Adaptation
Adaptation potential
Adaptive capacity
Adaptive management
Assessment
Assessments
Awareness
Barriers
Beliefs
Climate change
Forest management
Forest management practitioners
Forests
Human capital
Institutions
Knowledge
Learning
Management
Monitoring
Partnerships
Perceptions
Planning
Risk
title Assessing the potential for forest management practitioner participation in climate change adaptation
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-17T22%3A12%3A19IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Assessing%20the%20potential%20for%20forest%20management%20practitioner%20participation%20in%20climate%20change%20adaptation&rft.jtitle=Forest%20ecology%20and%20management&rft.au=Nelson,%20Harry%20W.&rft.date=2016-01-15&rft.volume=360&rft.spage=388&rft.epage=399&rft.pages=388-399&rft.issn=0378-1127&rft.eissn=1872-7042&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.foreco.2015.09.038&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1753479348%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1753479348&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0378112715005332&rfr_iscdi=true