Phosphodiesterase Type 5 Inhibitor Use Following Radical Prostatectomy is not Associated with an Increased Risk of Biochemical Recurrence
Objective Recently, conflicting findings have been reported on the effect of phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitor (PDE5I) use on biochemical outcome following radical prostatectomy (RP). Thus, we investigated the impact of PDE5I treatment following RP, including therapeutic strategy, timing, duration,...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Annals of surgical oncology 2016-05, Vol.23 (5), p.1760-1767 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1767 |
---|---|
container_issue | 5 |
container_start_page | 1760 |
container_title | Annals of surgical oncology |
container_volume | 23 |
creator | Jo, Jung Ki Kim, Kwangmo Lee, Sang Eun Lee, Jung Keun Byun, Seok-Soo Hong, Sung Kyu |
description | Objective
Recently, conflicting findings have been reported on the effect of phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitor (PDE5I) use on biochemical outcome following radical prostatectomy (RP). Thus, we investigated the impact of PDE5I treatment following RP, including therapeutic strategy, timing, duration, and drug type, on oncologic outcomes.
Methods
We analyzed records of 1082 patients who underwent bilateral nerve-sparing RP for clinically localized prostate cancer (PCa) between 2005 and 2014. Patients were categorized according to PDE5I use within 2 years following RP: non-user, on-demand, and rehabilitation (daily PDE5I use for ≥3 months) groups. Associations of various factors with biochemical recurrence (BCR) were analyzed using a Cox multivariate proportional hazards model. Propensity score-matched analysis was also performed.
Results
Among the subjects included in our study, PDE5I use was as follows: 253 (23.4 %) non-users, 475 (43.9 %) on-demand users, and 354 (32.7 %) in the rehabilitation. Multivariate analysis showed that PDE5I use was not a significant factor with regard to BCR risk [hazard ratio 1.47 (0.765–2.826);
p
=
0.248). Among the PDE5I users, a strategy for PDE5I use (on-demand vs. rehabilitation), timing of initiating PDE5I treatment following RP, duration of PDE5I use, and type of PDE5I used were not associated with an increased BCR risk in multivariate analyses (
p
=
0.304,
p
=
0.177,
p
=
0.332, and
p
=
0.105, respectively). In addition, PDE5I use was not associated with an increased risk of BCR among 478 matched cohorts (
p
= 0.672).
Conclusions
PDE5I treatment following RP was not found to have any significant impact on biochemical outcome regardless of therapeutic strategy, timing, duration, and drug type. Such findings suggest that PDE5I treatment following RP is oncologically safe. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1245/s10434-015-5059-1 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1777986602</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>4004240761</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c372t-7684d81b0f7d452dab6a0ae32d44d1e33b748a029f14c3a53746b4ecf1db61a53</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kctu1DAUhi0EoqXwAGyQJTZsAj6-JstSUahUiWrUriPHPmlckniwE1XzCH3repiCEBIr28ff-Xz5CXkL7CNwqT5lYFLIioGqFFNNBc_IMahSkbqG52XOdF01XKsj8irnO8bACKZekiOuDZhGNMfk4WqIeTtEHzAvmGxGer3bIlX0Yh5CF5aY6E0pnsdxjPdhvqUb64OzI71KMS92QbfEaUdDpnNc6GnO0YVS9fQ-LAO1c_G4hMXr6SbkHzT29HOIbsDpl2WDbk0JZ4evyYvejhnfPI0n5Ob8y_XZt-ry-9eLs9PLygnDl8roWvoaOtYbLxX3ttOWWRTcS-kBheiMrC3jTQ_SCauEkbqT6HrwnYayPiEfDt5tij_X8up2CtnhONoZ45pbMMY0tdaMF_T9P-hdXNNcbrendOFYA4WCA-XKj-SEfbtNYbJp1wJr9zm1h5zaklO7z6nd97x7Mq_dhP5Px-9gCsAPQC5b8y2mv47-r_URgiGe2Q</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1776779091</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Phosphodiesterase Type 5 Inhibitor Use Following Radical Prostatectomy is not Associated with an Increased Risk of Biochemical Recurrence</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>SpringerLink</source><creator>Jo, Jung Ki ; Kim, Kwangmo ; Lee, Sang Eun ; Lee, Jung Keun ; Byun, Seok-Soo ; Hong, Sung Kyu</creator><creatorcontrib>Jo, Jung Ki ; Kim, Kwangmo ; Lee, Sang Eun ; Lee, Jung Keun ; Byun, Seok-Soo ; Hong, Sung Kyu</creatorcontrib><description>Objective
Recently, conflicting findings have been reported on the effect of phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitor (PDE5I) use on biochemical outcome following radical prostatectomy (RP). Thus, we investigated the impact of PDE5I treatment following RP, including therapeutic strategy, timing, duration, and drug type, on oncologic outcomes.
Methods
We analyzed records of 1082 patients who underwent bilateral nerve-sparing RP for clinically localized prostate cancer (PCa) between 2005 and 2014. Patients were categorized according to PDE5I use within 2 years following RP: non-user, on-demand, and rehabilitation (daily PDE5I use for ≥3 months) groups. Associations of various factors with biochemical recurrence (BCR) were analyzed using a Cox multivariate proportional hazards model. Propensity score-matched analysis was also performed.
Results
Among the subjects included in our study, PDE5I use was as follows: 253 (23.4 %) non-users, 475 (43.9 %) on-demand users, and 354 (32.7 %) in the rehabilitation. Multivariate analysis showed that PDE5I use was not a significant factor with regard to BCR risk [hazard ratio 1.47 (0.765–2.826);
p
=
0.248). Among the PDE5I users, a strategy for PDE5I use (on-demand vs. rehabilitation), timing of initiating PDE5I treatment following RP, duration of PDE5I use, and type of PDE5I used were not associated with an increased BCR risk in multivariate analyses (
p
=
0.304,
p
=
0.177,
p
=
0.332, and
p
=
0.105, respectively). In addition, PDE5I use was not associated with an increased risk of BCR among 478 matched cohorts (
p
= 0.672).
Conclusions
PDE5I treatment following RP was not found to have any significant impact on biochemical outcome regardless of therapeutic strategy, timing, duration, and drug type. Such findings suggest that PDE5I treatment following RP is oncologically safe.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1068-9265</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1534-4681</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1245/s10434-015-5059-1</identifier><identifier>PMID: 26717939</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cham: Springer International Publishing</publisher><subject>Aged ; Combined Modality Therapy ; Follow-Up Studies ; Humans ; Male ; Medicine ; Medicine & Public Health ; Middle Aged ; Neoplasm Grading ; Neoplasm Recurrence, Local - prevention & control ; Oncology ; Phosphodiesterase 5 Inhibitors - therapeutic use ; Prognosis ; Proportional Hazards Models ; Prostatectomy ; Prostatic Neoplasms - drug therapy ; Prostatic Neoplasms - pathology ; Prostatic Neoplasms - surgery ; Risk Factors ; Surgery ; Surgical Oncology ; Urologic Oncology</subject><ispartof>Annals of surgical oncology, 2016-05, Vol.23 (5), p.1760-1767</ispartof><rights>Society of Surgical Oncology 2015</rights><rights>Society of Surgical Oncology 2016</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c372t-7684d81b0f7d452dab6a0ae32d44d1e33b748a029f14c3a53746b4ecf1db61a53</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c372t-7684d81b0f7d452dab6a0ae32d44d1e33b748a029f14c3a53746b4ecf1db61a53</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1245/s10434-015-5059-1$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1245/s10434-015-5059-1$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27923,27924,41487,42556,51318</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26717939$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Jo, Jung Ki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Kwangmo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, Sang Eun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, Jung Keun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Byun, Seok-Soo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hong, Sung Kyu</creatorcontrib><title>Phosphodiesterase Type 5 Inhibitor Use Following Radical Prostatectomy is not Associated with an Increased Risk of Biochemical Recurrence</title><title>Annals of surgical oncology</title><addtitle>Ann Surg Oncol</addtitle><addtitle>Ann Surg Oncol</addtitle><description>Objective
Recently, conflicting findings have been reported on the effect of phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitor (PDE5I) use on biochemical outcome following radical prostatectomy (RP). Thus, we investigated the impact of PDE5I treatment following RP, including therapeutic strategy, timing, duration, and drug type, on oncologic outcomes.
Methods
We analyzed records of 1082 patients who underwent bilateral nerve-sparing RP for clinically localized prostate cancer (PCa) between 2005 and 2014. Patients were categorized according to PDE5I use within 2 years following RP: non-user, on-demand, and rehabilitation (daily PDE5I use for ≥3 months) groups. Associations of various factors with biochemical recurrence (BCR) were analyzed using a Cox multivariate proportional hazards model. Propensity score-matched analysis was also performed.
Results
Among the subjects included in our study, PDE5I use was as follows: 253 (23.4 %) non-users, 475 (43.9 %) on-demand users, and 354 (32.7 %) in the rehabilitation. Multivariate analysis showed that PDE5I use was not a significant factor with regard to BCR risk [hazard ratio 1.47 (0.765–2.826);
p
=
0.248). Among the PDE5I users, a strategy for PDE5I use (on-demand vs. rehabilitation), timing of initiating PDE5I treatment following RP, duration of PDE5I use, and type of PDE5I used were not associated with an increased BCR risk in multivariate analyses (
p
=
0.304,
p
=
0.177,
p
=
0.332, and
p
=
0.105, respectively). In addition, PDE5I use was not associated with an increased risk of BCR among 478 matched cohorts (
p
= 0.672).
Conclusions
PDE5I treatment following RP was not found to have any significant impact on biochemical outcome regardless of therapeutic strategy, timing, duration, and drug type. Such findings suggest that PDE5I treatment following RP is oncologically safe.</description><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Combined Modality Therapy</subject><subject>Follow-Up Studies</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine & Public Health</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Neoplasm Grading</subject><subject>Neoplasm Recurrence, Local - prevention & control</subject><subject>Oncology</subject><subject>Phosphodiesterase 5 Inhibitors - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Prognosis</subject><subject>Proportional Hazards Models</subject><subject>Prostatectomy</subject><subject>Prostatic Neoplasms - drug therapy</subject><subject>Prostatic Neoplasms - pathology</subject><subject>Prostatic Neoplasms - surgery</subject><subject>Risk Factors</subject><subject>Surgery</subject><subject>Surgical Oncology</subject><subject>Urologic Oncology</subject><issn>1068-9265</issn><issn>1534-4681</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kctu1DAUhi0EoqXwAGyQJTZsAj6-JstSUahUiWrUriPHPmlckniwE1XzCH3repiCEBIr28ff-Xz5CXkL7CNwqT5lYFLIioGqFFNNBc_IMahSkbqG52XOdF01XKsj8irnO8bACKZekiOuDZhGNMfk4WqIeTtEHzAvmGxGer3bIlX0Yh5CF5aY6E0pnsdxjPdhvqUb64OzI71KMS92QbfEaUdDpnNc6GnO0YVS9fQ-LAO1c_G4hMXr6SbkHzT29HOIbsDpl2WDbk0JZ4evyYvejhnfPI0n5Ob8y_XZt-ry-9eLs9PLygnDl8roWvoaOtYbLxX3ttOWWRTcS-kBheiMrC3jTQ_SCauEkbqT6HrwnYayPiEfDt5tij_X8up2CtnhONoZ45pbMMY0tdaMF_T9P-hdXNNcbrendOFYA4WCA-XKj-SEfbtNYbJp1wJr9zm1h5zaklO7z6nd97x7Mq_dhP5Px-9gCsAPQC5b8y2mv47-r_URgiGe2Q</recordid><startdate>20160501</startdate><enddate>20160501</enddate><creator>Jo, Jung Ki</creator><creator>Kim, Kwangmo</creator><creator>Lee, Sang Eun</creator><creator>Lee, Jung Keun</creator><creator>Byun, Seok-Soo</creator><creator>Hong, Sung Kyu</creator><general>Springer International Publishing</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7TO</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20160501</creationdate><title>Phosphodiesterase Type 5 Inhibitor Use Following Radical Prostatectomy is not Associated with an Increased Risk of Biochemical Recurrence</title><author>Jo, Jung Ki ; Kim, Kwangmo ; Lee, Sang Eun ; Lee, Jung Keun ; Byun, Seok-Soo ; Hong, Sung Kyu</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c372t-7684d81b0f7d452dab6a0ae32d44d1e33b748a029f14c3a53746b4ecf1db61a53</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Combined Modality Therapy</topic><topic>Follow-Up Studies</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine & Public Health</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Neoplasm Grading</topic><topic>Neoplasm Recurrence, Local - prevention & control</topic><topic>Oncology</topic><topic>Phosphodiesterase 5 Inhibitors - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Prognosis</topic><topic>Proportional Hazards Models</topic><topic>Prostatectomy</topic><topic>Prostatic Neoplasms - drug therapy</topic><topic>Prostatic Neoplasms - pathology</topic><topic>Prostatic Neoplasms - surgery</topic><topic>Risk Factors</topic><topic>Surgery</topic><topic>Surgical Oncology</topic><topic>Urologic Oncology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Jo, Jung Ki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Kwangmo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, Sang Eun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, Jung Keun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Byun, Seok-Soo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hong, Sung Kyu</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Oncogenes and Growth Factors Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest - Health & Medical Complete保健、医学与药学数据库</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>PML(ProQuest Medical Library)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Annals of surgical oncology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Jo, Jung Ki</au><au>Kim, Kwangmo</au><au>Lee, Sang Eun</au><au>Lee, Jung Keun</au><au>Byun, Seok-Soo</au><au>Hong, Sung Kyu</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Phosphodiesterase Type 5 Inhibitor Use Following Radical Prostatectomy is not Associated with an Increased Risk of Biochemical Recurrence</atitle><jtitle>Annals of surgical oncology</jtitle><stitle>Ann Surg Oncol</stitle><addtitle>Ann Surg Oncol</addtitle><date>2016-05-01</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>23</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>1760</spage><epage>1767</epage><pages>1760-1767</pages><issn>1068-9265</issn><eissn>1534-4681</eissn><abstract>Objective
Recently, conflicting findings have been reported on the effect of phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitor (PDE5I) use on biochemical outcome following radical prostatectomy (RP). Thus, we investigated the impact of PDE5I treatment following RP, including therapeutic strategy, timing, duration, and drug type, on oncologic outcomes.
Methods
We analyzed records of 1082 patients who underwent bilateral nerve-sparing RP for clinically localized prostate cancer (PCa) between 2005 and 2014. Patients were categorized according to PDE5I use within 2 years following RP: non-user, on-demand, and rehabilitation (daily PDE5I use for ≥3 months) groups. Associations of various factors with biochemical recurrence (BCR) were analyzed using a Cox multivariate proportional hazards model. Propensity score-matched analysis was also performed.
Results
Among the subjects included in our study, PDE5I use was as follows: 253 (23.4 %) non-users, 475 (43.9 %) on-demand users, and 354 (32.7 %) in the rehabilitation. Multivariate analysis showed that PDE5I use was not a significant factor with regard to BCR risk [hazard ratio 1.47 (0.765–2.826);
p
=
0.248). Among the PDE5I users, a strategy for PDE5I use (on-demand vs. rehabilitation), timing of initiating PDE5I treatment following RP, duration of PDE5I use, and type of PDE5I used were not associated with an increased BCR risk in multivariate analyses (
p
=
0.304,
p
=
0.177,
p
=
0.332, and
p
=
0.105, respectively). In addition, PDE5I use was not associated with an increased risk of BCR among 478 matched cohorts (
p
= 0.672).
Conclusions
PDE5I treatment following RP was not found to have any significant impact on biochemical outcome regardless of therapeutic strategy, timing, duration, and drug type. Such findings suggest that PDE5I treatment following RP is oncologically safe.</abstract><cop>Cham</cop><pub>Springer International Publishing</pub><pmid>26717939</pmid><doi>10.1245/s10434-015-5059-1</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1068-9265 |
ispartof | Annals of surgical oncology, 2016-05, Vol.23 (5), p.1760-1767 |
issn | 1068-9265 1534-4681 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1777986602 |
source | MEDLINE; SpringerLink |
subjects | Aged Combined Modality Therapy Follow-Up Studies Humans Male Medicine Medicine & Public Health Middle Aged Neoplasm Grading Neoplasm Recurrence, Local - prevention & control Oncology Phosphodiesterase 5 Inhibitors - therapeutic use Prognosis Proportional Hazards Models Prostatectomy Prostatic Neoplasms - drug therapy Prostatic Neoplasms - pathology Prostatic Neoplasms - surgery Risk Factors Surgery Surgical Oncology Urologic Oncology |
title | Phosphodiesterase Type 5 Inhibitor Use Following Radical Prostatectomy is not Associated with an Increased Risk of Biochemical Recurrence |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-10T15%3A07%3A39IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Phosphodiesterase%20Type%205%20Inhibitor%20Use%20Following%20Radical%20Prostatectomy%20is%20not%20Associated%20with%20an%20Increased%20Risk%20of%20Biochemical%20Recurrence&rft.jtitle=Annals%20of%20surgical%20oncology&rft.au=Jo,%20Jung%20Ki&rft.date=2016-05-01&rft.volume=23&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=1760&rft.epage=1767&rft.pages=1760-1767&rft.issn=1068-9265&rft.eissn=1534-4681&rft_id=info:doi/10.1245/s10434-015-5059-1&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E4004240761%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1776779091&rft_id=info:pmid/26717939&rfr_iscdi=true |