Does Number of Perceptions or Cross-Modal Auditory Cueing Influence Audiovisual Processing Speed?
What factors contribute to redundant target processing speed besides statistical facilitation? one possibility is that multiple percepts may drive these effects. Another, although not mutually exclusive hypothesis, is that cross- channel cueing from one modality to another may influence response tim...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | The American journal of psychology 2016-03, Vol.129 (1), p.11-21 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 21 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 1 |
| container_start_page | 11 |
| container_title | The American journal of psychology |
| container_volume | 129 |
| creator | Altieri, Nicholas Wenger, Michael J. Wallace, Mark T. Stevenson, Ryan A. |
| description | What factors contribute to redundant target processing speed besides statistical facilitation? one possibility is that multiple percepts may drive these effects. Another, although not mutually exclusive hypothesis, is that cross- channel cueing from one modality to another may influence response times. We implemented an auditory–visual detection task using the sound- induced flash illusion to examine whether one or both of these possibilities contributes to changes in processing speed; we did so by examining the data of individual participants. our results indicated shorter response times in several participants when multiple flashes were perceived in the standard sound- induced flash illusion, thereby replicating previous work in the literature. Additionally, we found evidence for faster responses in several participants when carrying out the same analysis in trials in which 1 beep was presented with 2 real flashes. overall, our analysis indicates that some observers benefit from cross- modal facilitation, whereas others may benefit from a combination of cross- modal facilitation and increased perceptual judgments. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.5406/amerjpsyc.129.1.0011 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1777985335</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A445017871</galeid><jstor_id>10.5406/amerjpsyc.129.1.0011</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>A445017871</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c639t-45d714c216caf1ffecd735ba37c49559e358de56da0199297a30f6d31656ab843</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkmGP0yAYxxuj8ebpNzCmiYnRF51QSimvzFL1vGR6l6ivCYOnu05aKhTjvr3sNnfOzBleEOD3hwf4JclTjKa0QOVr2YFbDX6tpjjnUzxFCON7yQRzwrMq59X9ZIIQyjNOaXmWPPJ-FYcIV_hhcpYzlHOMyCSRby349FPoFuBS26TX4BQMY2t7n1qX1s56n320Wpp0FnQ7WrdO6wBtv0wv-8YE6BXcrtgfrQ-RunZWgfcb4PMAoN88Th400nh4suvPk6_v332pP2Tzq4vLejbPVEn4mBVUM1yoHJdKNrhpQGlG6EISpop4BQ6EVhpoqSXCnOecSYKaUhNc0lIuqoKcJy-3-w7Ofg_gR9G1XoExsgcbvMCMMV5RQmhEn_-FrmxwfaxOEERQxTjiJynMSkpZwVFxRy2lAdH2jR2dVJujxawoKMKsYjhS2RFqCT04aWwPTRunD_jpET42DV2rjgZeHQQiM8LPcSmD96K6mJ8qZscqawwsQcRfqa8O-Rd_8DcgzXjjrQm3lhyCxRZUG20cNGJwbSfdWmAkNtKKvbQiSiuw2EgbY892Dx0WHeh96Leld5db-Sjgfv0fm-Fj7H8KyLcZHb5BGFz0V_hBnQ79AmVkE7o</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1765574904</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Does Number of Perceptions or Cross-Modal Auditory Cueing Influence Audiovisual Processing Speed?</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing</source><creator>Altieri, Nicholas ; Wenger, Michael J. ; Wallace, Mark T. ; Stevenson, Ryan A.</creator><creatorcontrib>Altieri, Nicholas ; Wenger, Michael J. ; Wallace, Mark T. ; Stevenson, Ryan A.</creatorcontrib><description>What factors contribute to redundant target processing speed besides statistical facilitation? one possibility is that multiple percepts may drive these effects. Another, although not mutually exclusive hypothesis, is that cross- channel cueing from one modality to another may influence response times. We implemented an auditory–visual detection task using the sound- induced flash illusion to examine whether one or both of these possibilities contributes to changes in processing speed; we did so by examining the data of individual participants. our results indicated shorter response times in several participants when multiple flashes were perceived in the standard sound- induced flash illusion, thereby replicating previous work in the literature. Additionally, we found evidence for faster responses in several participants when carrying out the same analysis in trials in which 1 beep was presented with 2 real flashes. overall, our analysis indicates that some observers benefit from cross- modal facilitation, whereas others may benefit from a combination of cross- modal facilitation and increased perceptual judgments.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0002-9556</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1939-8298</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.5406/amerjpsyc.129.1.0011</identifier><identifier>PMID: 27029103</identifier><identifier>CODEN: AJPCAA</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: University of Illinois Press</publisher><subject>Acoustic data ; Adult ; Auditory perception ; Auditory Perception - physiology ; Beeps ; Cognition & reasoning ; Court decisions ; Cross-modal ; Cues ; Detection ; Ears & hearing ; Empirical evidence ; Experimentation ; Facilitation ; Female ; Humans ; Illusion ; Information processing ; Judgment ; Male ; Observational research ; Observations ; Participant observation ; Perception ; Perception (Psychology) ; Perceptual-motor processes ; Physiological aspects ; Processing speed ; Psychology ; Psychomotor Performance - physiology ; Reaction time ; Redundant ; Response time ; Sensorimotor integration ; Sensory integration ; Sensory perception ; Social Sciences ; Statistical tests ; Visual perception ; Visual Perception - physiology ; Visual task performance ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>The American journal of psychology, 2016-03, Vol.129 (1), p.11-21</ispartof><rights>Copyright 2016 by the Board of Trustees of the University of Illinois</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2016 University of Illinois Press</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2016 University of Illinois Press</rights><rights>Copyright University of Illinois Press Spring 2016</rights><rights>Copyright 2016 by the Board of Trustees of the University of Illinois 2016</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,803,27923,27924,30998</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27029103$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Altieri, Nicholas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wenger, Michael J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wallace, Mark T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stevenson, Ryan A.</creatorcontrib><title>Does Number of Perceptions or Cross-Modal Auditory Cueing Influence Audiovisual Processing Speed?</title><title>The American journal of psychology</title><addtitle>Am J Psychol</addtitle><description>What factors contribute to redundant target processing speed besides statistical facilitation? one possibility is that multiple percepts may drive these effects. Another, although not mutually exclusive hypothesis, is that cross- channel cueing from one modality to another may influence response times. We implemented an auditory–visual detection task using the sound- induced flash illusion to examine whether one or both of these possibilities contributes to changes in processing speed; we did so by examining the data of individual participants. our results indicated shorter response times in several participants when multiple flashes were perceived in the standard sound- induced flash illusion, thereby replicating previous work in the literature. Additionally, we found evidence for faster responses in several participants when carrying out the same analysis in trials in which 1 beep was presented with 2 real flashes. overall, our analysis indicates that some observers benefit from cross- modal facilitation, whereas others may benefit from a combination of cross- modal facilitation and increased perceptual judgments.</description><subject>Acoustic data</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Auditory perception</subject><subject>Auditory Perception - physiology</subject><subject>Beeps</subject><subject>Cognition & reasoning</subject><subject>Court decisions</subject><subject>Cross-modal</subject><subject>Cues</subject><subject>Detection</subject><subject>Ears & hearing</subject><subject>Empirical evidence</subject><subject>Experimentation</subject><subject>Facilitation</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Illusion</subject><subject>Information processing</subject><subject>Judgment</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Observational research</subject><subject>Observations</subject><subject>Participant observation</subject><subject>Perception</subject><subject>Perception (Psychology)</subject><subject>Perceptual-motor processes</subject><subject>Physiological aspects</subject><subject>Processing speed</subject><subject>Psychology</subject><subject>Psychomotor Performance - physiology</subject><subject>Reaction time</subject><subject>Redundant</subject><subject>Response time</subject><subject>Sensorimotor integration</subject><subject>Sensory integration</subject><subject>Sensory perception</subject><subject>Social Sciences</subject><subject>Statistical tests</subject><subject>Visual perception</subject><subject>Visual Perception - physiology</subject><subject>Visual task performance</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>0002-9556</issn><issn>1939-8298</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkmGP0yAYxxuj8ebpNzCmiYnRF51QSimvzFL1vGR6l6ivCYOnu05aKhTjvr3sNnfOzBleEOD3hwf4JclTjKa0QOVr2YFbDX6tpjjnUzxFCON7yQRzwrMq59X9ZIIQyjNOaXmWPPJ-FYcIV_hhcpYzlHOMyCSRby349FPoFuBS26TX4BQMY2t7n1qX1s56n320Wpp0FnQ7WrdO6wBtv0wv-8YE6BXcrtgfrQ-RunZWgfcb4PMAoN88Th400nh4suvPk6_v332pP2Tzq4vLejbPVEn4mBVUM1yoHJdKNrhpQGlG6EISpop4BQ6EVhpoqSXCnOecSYKaUhNc0lIuqoKcJy-3-w7Ofg_gR9G1XoExsgcbvMCMMV5RQmhEn_-FrmxwfaxOEERQxTjiJynMSkpZwVFxRy2lAdH2jR2dVJujxawoKMKsYjhS2RFqCT04aWwPTRunD_jpET42DV2rjgZeHQQiM8LPcSmD96K6mJ8qZscqawwsQcRfqa8O-Rd_8DcgzXjjrQm3lhyCxRZUG20cNGJwbSfdWmAkNtKKvbQiSiuw2EgbY892Dx0WHeh96Leld5db-Sjgfv0fm-Fj7H8KyLcZHb5BGFz0V_hBnQ79AmVkE7o</recordid><startdate>20160322</startdate><enddate>20160322</enddate><creator>Altieri, Nicholas</creator><creator>Wenger, Michael J.</creator><creator>Wallace, Mark T.</creator><creator>Stevenson, Ryan A.</creator><general>University of Illinois Press</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8GL</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB~</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20160322</creationdate><title>Does Number of Perceptions or Cross-Modal Auditory Cueing Influence Audiovisual Processing Speed?</title><author>Altieri, Nicholas ; Wenger, Michael J. ; Wallace, Mark T. ; Stevenson, Ryan A.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c639t-45d714c216caf1ffecd735ba37c49559e358de56da0199297a30f6d31656ab843</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Acoustic data</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Auditory perception</topic><topic>Auditory Perception - physiology</topic><topic>Beeps</topic><topic>Cognition & reasoning</topic><topic>Court decisions</topic><topic>Cross-modal</topic><topic>Cues</topic><topic>Detection</topic><topic>Ears & hearing</topic><topic>Empirical evidence</topic><topic>Experimentation</topic><topic>Facilitation</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Illusion</topic><topic>Information processing</topic><topic>Judgment</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Observational research</topic><topic>Observations</topic><topic>Participant observation</topic><topic>Perception</topic><topic>Perception (Psychology)</topic><topic>Perceptual-motor processes</topic><topic>Physiological aspects</topic><topic>Processing speed</topic><topic>Psychology</topic><topic>Psychomotor Performance - physiology</topic><topic>Reaction time</topic><topic>Redundant</topic><topic>Response time</topic><topic>Sensorimotor integration</topic><topic>Sensory integration</topic><topic>Sensory perception</topic><topic>Social Sciences</topic><topic>Statistical tests</topic><topic>Visual perception</topic><topic>Visual Perception - physiology</topic><topic>Visual task performance</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Altieri, Nicholas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wenger, Michael J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wallace, Mark T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stevenson, Ryan A.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale In Context: High School</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Newsstand Professional</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>The American journal of psychology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Altieri, Nicholas</au><au>Wenger, Michael J.</au><au>Wallace, Mark T.</au><au>Stevenson, Ryan A.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Does Number of Perceptions or Cross-Modal Auditory Cueing Influence Audiovisual Processing Speed?</atitle><jtitle>The American journal of psychology</jtitle><addtitle>Am J Psychol</addtitle><date>2016-03-22</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>129</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>11</spage><epage>21</epage><pages>11-21</pages><issn>0002-9556</issn><eissn>1939-8298</eissn><coden>AJPCAA</coden><abstract>What factors contribute to redundant target processing speed besides statistical facilitation? one possibility is that multiple percepts may drive these effects. Another, although not mutually exclusive hypothesis, is that cross- channel cueing from one modality to another may influence response times. We implemented an auditory–visual detection task using the sound- induced flash illusion to examine whether one or both of these possibilities contributes to changes in processing speed; we did so by examining the data of individual participants. our results indicated shorter response times in several participants when multiple flashes were perceived in the standard sound- induced flash illusion, thereby replicating previous work in the literature. Additionally, we found evidence for faster responses in several participants when carrying out the same analysis in trials in which 1 beep was presented with 2 real flashes. overall, our analysis indicates that some observers benefit from cross- modal facilitation, whereas others may benefit from a combination of cross- modal facilitation and increased perceptual judgments.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>University of Illinois Press</pub><pmid>27029103</pmid><doi>10.5406/amerjpsyc.129.1.0011</doi><tpages>11</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0002-9556 |
| ispartof | The American journal of psychology, 2016-03, Vol.129 (1), p.11-21 |
| issn | 0002-9556 1939-8298 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1777985335 |
| source | MEDLINE; Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing |
| subjects | Acoustic data Adult Auditory perception Auditory Perception - physiology Beeps Cognition & reasoning Court decisions Cross-modal Cues Detection Ears & hearing Empirical evidence Experimentation Facilitation Female Humans Illusion Information processing Judgment Male Observational research Observations Participant observation Perception Perception (Psychology) Perceptual-motor processes Physiological aspects Processing speed Psychology Psychomotor Performance - physiology Reaction time Redundant Response time Sensorimotor integration Sensory integration Sensory perception Social Sciences Statistical tests Visual perception Visual Perception - physiology Visual task performance Young Adult |
| title | Does Number of Perceptions or Cross-Modal Auditory Cueing Influence Audiovisual Processing Speed? |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-12T21%3A46%3A09IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Does%20Number%20of%20Perceptions%20or%20Cross-Modal%20Auditory%20Cueing%20Influence%20Audiovisual%20Processing%20Speed?&rft.jtitle=The%20American%20journal%20of%20psychology&rft.au=Altieri,%20Nicholas&rft.date=2016-03-22&rft.volume=129&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=11&rft.epage=21&rft.pages=11-21&rft.issn=0002-9556&rft.eissn=1939-8298&rft.coden=AJPCAA&rft_id=info:doi/10.5406/amerjpsyc.129.1.0011&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA445017871%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1765574904&rft_id=info:pmid/27029103&rft_galeid=A445017871&rft_jstor_id=10.5406/amerjpsyc.129.1.0011&rfr_iscdi=true |