Towards a consensus on how to diagnose and quantify female pattern hair loss - The 'Female Pattern Hair Loss Severity Index (FPHL-SI)'

Background Female pattern hair loss (FPHL) is a common non‐scarring alopecia characterized by widening of the midline hair part at the crown (vertex). In 1977, Ludwig developed a scale that graded the degree of visible vertex hair thinning from I (least severe) to III (most severe). However, by the...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology 2016-04, Vol.30 (4), p.667-676
Hauptverfasser: Harries, M., Tosti, A., Bergfeld, W., Blume-Peytavi, U., Shapiro, J., Lutz, G., Messenger, A., Sinclair, R., Paus, R.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 676
container_issue 4
container_start_page 667
container_title Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology
container_volume 30
creator Harries, M.
Tosti, A.
Bergfeld, W.
Blume-Peytavi, U.
Shapiro, J.
Lutz, G.
Messenger, A.
Sinclair, R.
Paus, R.
description Background Female pattern hair loss (FPHL) is a common non‐scarring alopecia characterized by widening of the midline hair part at the crown (vertex). In 1977, Ludwig developed a scale that graded the degree of visible vertex hair thinning from I (least severe) to III (most severe). However, by the time patients exhibit the full manifestations of ‘Ludwig I’, they have already lost a significant volume of hair. Although current therapies may realistically halt progression of hair loss, improvements in hair density is often more limited. Identification and grading of FPHL at an earlier stage is desirable to institute appropriate therapy before significant hair loss has occurred and to enable monitoring over time. Aim To generate consensus guidance for the recognition and quantification of FPHL that can be used in the clinic. Methods Nine clinicians from Europe, North America and Australia experienced in the management of FPHL developed this scale by consensus. Results We propose a three‐point severity scale (termed the FPHL Severity Index (FPHL‐SI)) that combines validated measures of hair shedding, midline hair density and scalp trichoscopy criteria to produce a total FPHL‐SI score (maximum score = 20). The score is designed to grade FPHL severity over time, while being sufficiently sensitive to identify early disease. A score of 0–4 makes FPHL unlikely; a score of 5–9 would indicate early‐stage FPHL, with higher scores indicating greater disease severity. Conclusions As a starting point for further public debate, we employ criteria already used in clinical practice to generate a pragmatic FPHL grading system (FPHL‐SI) of sufficient sensitivity to identify and monitor early FPHL changes. This may have to be further optimized after systematic validation in clinical practice.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/jdv.13455
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1777982998</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1777982998</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3985-a75a39607156c355504fec91d293cf75444df3740b9464dd38eb79121e58c5d73</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kMtS2zAUhjUdOiWlXfACjHbAwiBZN2vJBHJhMikd0napUazjYupYQbIJeYE-N04d2PVszuL_zj9nPoSOKbmg3Vw-uucLyrgQH9CAcpkljGTsAA2ITmWitdCH6HOMj4QQSkX2CR2mUiopUj5Afxd-Y4OL2OLc1xHq2Ebsa_zgN7jx2JX2d-0jYFs7_NTauimLLS5gZSvAa9s0EDrWlgFXPkac4MUD4NNRn9_t88kun-3ye3iGUDZbPK0dvOCz0d1kltxPz0-_oI-FrSJ83e8j9GN0sxhOktm38XR4NUtypjORWCUs05IoKmTOhBCEF5Br6lLN8kIJzrkrmOJkqbnkzrEMlkrTlILIcuEUO0Jnfe86-KcWYmNWZcyhqmwNvo2GKqV0lmqddeh5j-ahez1AYdahXNmwNZSYnXbTaTf_tHfsyb62Xa7AvZNvnjvgsgc2ZQXb_zeZ2-ufb5VJf1HGBl7eL2z4Y6RiSphf87GZSzb_LsfUTNgrt9uZhw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1777982998</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Towards a consensus on how to diagnose and quantify female pattern hair loss - The 'Female Pattern Hair Loss Severity Index (FPHL-SI)'</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Journals</source><creator>Harries, M. ; Tosti, A. ; Bergfeld, W. ; Blume-Peytavi, U. ; Shapiro, J. ; Lutz, G. ; Messenger, A. ; Sinclair, R. ; Paus, R.</creator><creatorcontrib>Harries, M. ; Tosti, A. ; Bergfeld, W. ; Blume-Peytavi, U. ; Shapiro, J. ; Lutz, G. ; Messenger, A. ; Sinclair, R. ; Paus, R.</creatorcontrib><description>Background Female pattern hair loss (FPHL) is a common non‐scarring alopecia characterized by widening of the midline hair part at the crown (vertex). In 1977, Ludwig developed a scale that graded the degree of visible vertex hair thinning from I (least severe) to III (most severe). However, by the time patients exhibit the full manifestations of ‘Ludwig I’, they have already lost a significant volume of hair. Although current therapies may realistically halt progression of hair loss, improvements in hair density is often more limited. Identification and grading of FPHL at an earlier stage is desirable to institute appropriate therapy before significant hair loss has occurred and to enable monitoring over time. Aim To generate consensus guidance for the recognition and quantification of FPHL that can be used in the clinic. Methods Nine clinicians from Europe, North America and Australia experienced in the management of FPHL developed this scale by consensus. Results We propose a three‐point severity scale (termed the FPHL Severity Index (FPHL‐SI)) that combines validated measures of hair shedding, midline hair density and scalp trichoscopy criteria to produce a total FPHL‐SI score (maximum score = 20). The score is designed to grade FPHL severity over time, while being sufficiently sensitive to identify early disease. A score of 0–4 makes FPHL unlikely; a score of 5–9 would indicate early‐stage FPHL, with higher scores indicating greater disease severity. Conclusions As a starting point for further public debate, we employ criteria already used in clinical practice to generate a pragmatic FPHL grading system (FPHL‐SI) of sufficient sensitivity to identify and monitor early FPHL changes. This may have to be further optimized after systematic validation in clinical practice.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0926-9959</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1468-3083</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/jdv.13455</identifier><identifier>PMID: 26676524</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Alopecia - classification ; Alopecia - diagnosis ; Female ; Humans ; Severity of Illness Index</subject><ispartof>Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology, 2016-04, Vol.30 (4), p.667-676</ispartof><rights>2015 European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology</rights><rights>2015 European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3985-a75a39607156c355504fec91d293cf75444df3740b9464dd38eb79121e58c5d73</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3985-a75a39607156c355504fec91d293cf75444df3740b9464dd38eb79121e58c5d73</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fjdv.13455$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fjdv.13455$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,27924,27925,45574,45575</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26676524$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Harries, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tosti, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bergfeld, W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Blume-Peytavi, U.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shapiro, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lutz, G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Messenger, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sinclair, R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Paus, R.</creatorcontrib><title>Towards a consensus on how to diagnose and quantify female pattern hair loss - The 'Female Pattern Hair Loss Severity Index (FPHL-SI)'</title><title>Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology</title><addtitle>J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol</addtitle><description>Background Female pattern hair loss (FPHL) is a common non‐scarring alopecia characterized by widening of the midline hair part at the crown (vertex). In 1977, Ludwig developed a scale that graded the degree of visible vertex hair thinning from I (least severe) to III (most severe). However, by the time patients exhibit the full manifestations of ‘Ludwig I’, they have already lost a significant volume of hair. Although current therapies may realistically halt progression of hair loss, improvements in hair density is often more limited. Identification and grading of FPHL at an earlier stage is desirable to institute appropriate therapy before significant hair loss has occurred and to enable monitoring over time. Aim To generate consensus guidance for the recognition and quantification of FPHL that can be used in the clinic. Methods Nine clinicians from Europe, North America and Australia experienced in the management of FPHL developed this scale by consensus. Results We propose a three‐point severity scale (termed the FPHL Severity Index (FPHL‐SI)) that combines validated measures of hair shedding, midline hair density and scalp trichoscopy criteria to produce a total FPHL‐SI score (maximum score = 20). The score is designed to grade FPHL severity over time, while being sufficiently sensitive to identify early disease. A score of 0–4 makes FPHL unlikely; a score of 5–9 would indicate early‐stage FPHL, with higher scores indicating greater disease severity. Conclusions As a starting point for further public debate, we employ criteria already used in clinical practice to generate a pragmatic FPHL grading system (FPHL‐SI) of sufficient sensitivity to identify and monitor early FPHL changes. This may have to be further optimized after systematic validation in clinical practice.</description><subject>Alopecia - classification</subject><subject>Alopecia - diagnosis</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Severity of Illness Index</subject><issn>0926-9959</issn><issn>1468-3083</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kMtS2zAUhjUdOiWlXfACjHbAwiBZN2vJBHJhMikd0napUazjYupYQbIJeYE-N04d2PVszuL_zj9nPoSOKbmg3Vw-uucLyrgQH9CAcpkljGTsAA2ITmWitdCH6HOMj4QQSkX2CR2mUiopUj5Afxd-Y4OL2OLc1xHq2Ebsa_zgN7jx2JX2d-0jYFs7_NTauimLLS5gZSvAa9s0EDrWlgFXPkac4MUD4NNRn9_t88kun-3ye3iGUDZbPK0dvOCz0d1kltxPz0-_oI-FrSJ83e8j9GN0sxhOktm38XR4NUtypjORWCUs05IoKmTOhBCEF5Br6lLN8kIJzrkrmOJkqbnkzrEMlkrTlILIcuEUO0Jnfe86-KcWYmNWZcyhqmwNvo2GKqV0lmqddeh5j-ahez1AYdahXNmwNZSYnXbTaTf_tHfsyb62Xa7AvZNvnjvgsgc2ZQXb_zeZ2-ufb5VJf1HGBl7eL2z4Y6RiSphf87GZSzb_LsfUTNgrt9uZhw</recordid><startdate>201604</startdate><enddate>201604</enddate><creator>Harries, M.</creator><creator>Tosti, A.</creator><creator>Bergfeld, W.</creator><creator>Blume-Peytavi, U.</creator><creator>Shapiro, J.</creator><creator>Lutz, G.</creator><creator>Messenger, A.</creator><creator>Sinclair, R.</creator><creator>Paus, R.</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201604</creationdate><title>Towards a consensus on how to diagnose and quantify female pattern hair loss - The 'Female Pattern Hair Loss Severity Index (FPHL-SI)'</title><author>Harries, M. ; Tosti, A. ; Bergfeld, W. ; Blume-Peytavi, U. ; Shapiro, J. ; Lutz, G. ; Messenger, A. ; Sinclair, R. ; Paus, R.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3985-a75a39607156c355504fec91d293cf75444df3740b9464dd38eb79121e58c5d73</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Alopecia - classification</topic><topic>Alopecia - diagnosis</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Severity of Illness Index</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Harries, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tosti, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bergfeld, W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Blume-Peytavi, U.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shapiro, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lutz, G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Messenger, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sinclair, R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Paus, R.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Harries, M.</au><au>Tosti, A.</au><au>Bergfeld, W.</au><au>Blume-Peytavi, U.</au><au>Shapiro, J.</au><au>Lutz, G.</au><au>Messenger, A.</au><au>Sinclair, R.</au><au>Paus, R.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Towards a consensus on how to diagnose and quantify female pattern hair loss - The 'Female Pattern Hair Loss Severity Index (FPHL-SI)'</atitle><jtitle>Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology</jtitle><addtitle>J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol</addtitle><date>2016-04</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>30</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>667</spage><epage>676</epage><pages>667-676</pages><issn>0926-9959</issn><eissn>1468-3083</eissn><abstract>Background Female pattern hair loss (FPHL) is a common non‐scarring alopecia characterized by widening of the midline hair part at the crown (vertex). In 1977, Ludwig developed a scale that graded the degree of visible vertex hair thinning from I (least severe) to III (most severe). However, by the time patients exhibit the full manifestations of ‘Ludwig I’, they have already lost a significant volume of hair. Although current therapies may realistically halt progression of hair loss, improvements in hair density is often more limited. Identification and grading of FPHL at an earlier stage is desirable to institute appropriate therapy before significant hair loss has occurred and to enable monitoring over time. Aim To generate consensus guidance for the recognition and quantification of FPHL that can be used in the clinic. Methods Nine clinicians from Europe, North America and Australia experienced in the management of FPHL developed this scale by consensus. Results We propose a three‐point severity scale (termed the FPHL Severity Index (FPHL‐SI)) that combines validated measures of hair shedding, midline hair density and scalp trichoscopy criteria to produce a total FPHL‐SI score (maximum score = 20). The score is designed to grade FPHL severity over time, while being sufficiently sensitive to identify early disease. A score of 0–4 makes FPHL unlikely; a score of 5–9 would indicate early‐stage FPHL, with higher scores indicating greater disease severity. Conclusions As a starting point for further public debate, we employ criteria already used in clinical practice to generate a pragmatic FPHL grading system (FPHL‐SI) of sufficient sensitivity to identify and monitor early FPHL changes. This may have to be further optimized after systematic validation in clinical practice.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><pmid>26676524</pmid><doi>10.1111/jdv.13455</doi><tpages>10</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0926-9959
ispartof Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology, 2016-04, Vol.30 (4), p.667-676
issn 0926-9959
1468-3083
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1777982998
source MEDLINE; Wiley Journals
subjects Alopecia - classification
Alopecia - diagnosis
Female
Humans
Severity of Illness Index
title Towards a consensus on how to diagnose and quantify female pattern hair loss - The 'Female Pattern Hair Loss Severity Index (FPHL-SI)'
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-27T11%3A02%3A41IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Towards%20a%20consensus%20on%20how%20to%20diagnose%20and%20quantify%20female%20pattern%20hair%20loss%20-%20The%20'Female%20Pattern%20Hair%20Loss%20Severity%20Index%20(FPHL-SI)'&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20the%20European%20Academy%20of%20Dermatology%20and%20Venereology&rft.au=Harries,%20M.&rft.date=2016-04&rft.volume=30&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=667&rft.epage=676&rft.pages=667-676&rft.issn=0926-9959&rft.eissn=1468-3083&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/jdv.13455&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1777982998%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1777982998&rft_id=info:pmid/26676524&rfr_iscdi=true