Does Collaborative Case Conceptualisation enhance engagement and outcome in the treatment of anorexia nervosa? Rational, design and methods
Abstract Background Anorexia Nervosa (AN) is a severe and potentially chronic disorder characterised by low body weight and persistent behaviours that interfere with weight gain. Individuals with AN are often difficult to engage in treatment and display high rates of drop out. The Collaborative Case...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Contemporary clinical trials 2016-03, Vol.47, p.296-303 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 303 |
---|---|
container_issue | |
container_start_page | 296 |
container_title | Contemporary clinical trials |
container_volume | 47 |
creator | Mitchell, Sarah A Newton, Richard Harrison, Philippa Castle, David Brennan, Leah |
description | Abstract Background Anorexia Nervosa (AN) is a severe and potentially chronic disorder characterised by low body weight and persistent behaviours that interfere with weight gain. Individuals with AN are often difficult to engage in treatment and display high rates of drop out. The Collaborative Case Conceptualisation (CCC) assessment approach was developed to target proposed AN maintaining factors with the aim of improving treatment motivation and engagement and consequently treatment outcomes in individuals with AN. The proposed study aims to examine the efficacy of CCC in improving a range of outcomes including Body Mass Index, eating disorder symptomatology, general psychopathology, quality of life and future treatment motivation and participation. Potential mediators will also be explored. Methods/design Thirty-two participants will be recruited from Melbourne based specialist eating disorder services, community and university clinics, and health practitioner networks. Participants will be randomised to three individual sessions of either CCC or a standardised assessment condition (assessment as usual; AAU). The AAU assessment will include; a mental status examination, assessment of current disordered eating behaviours and cognitions, assessment of clinical history, and a physical examination. The CCC condition combines the AAU assessment components with shared collaborative formulation and tailored psychoeducation highlighting the consequences of the eating disorder on wellbeing and future goals in a supportive and motivating way. Implications This intervention may provide an effective and feasible method of improving treatment engagement and outcomes for individuals suffering from AN, with the ultimate outcome of reducing the negative biopsychosocial impacts of this potentially severe and chronic disorder. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.cct.2015.12.011 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1777979427</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S1551714415301427</els_id><sourcerecordid>1777979427</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c360t-41d89aba89b03bea049a76f7ea2e5973a903d42aaed90d0badb29efcb6c357743</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9UsuO1DAQjBCIfcAHcEE-ciDBdh5eCwmEhoVFWgmJx9nq2J0ZD4k92M6I_QZ-ep2ZXQ4c9uK2uqtK6qouiheMVoyy7s220jpVnLK2YryijD0qTlnbypLTmj4-_FkpWNOcFGcxbimtu7ZrnxYnvBNUyKY7Lf5-9BjJyo8j9D5AsnskK4j58U7jLs0w2pjb3hF0G8i9XNewxgldIuAM8XPSfkJiHUkbJCkgpMPQD3nuA_6xQByGvY_wnnw7aMH4mhiMdu0OEhOmjTfxWfFkgDHi87t6Xvz8dPljdVVef_38ZfXhutR1R1PZMHMhoYcL2dO6R6CNBNENAoFjK0UNktam4QBoJDW0B9NziYPuO123QjT1efHqqLsL_veMManJRo3ZAod-jooJIWS2h4sMZUeoDj7GgIPaBTtBuFGMqiUDtVU5A7VkoBhXOYPMeXknP_cTmn-Me9Mz4O0RgHnJvcWgoraYrTU2YBYz3j4o_-4_th6tsxrGX3iDcevnkP3NW6iYCer7cgTLDbC2pmzZ6RbgTq8d</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1777979427</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Does Collaborative Case Conceptualisation enhance engagement and outcome in the treatment of anorexia nervosa? Rational, design and methods</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)</source><creator>Mitchell, Sarah A ; Newton, Richard ; Harrison, Philippa ; Castle, David ; Brennan, Leah</creator><creatorcontrib>Mitchell, Sarah A ; Newton, Richard ; Harrison, Philippa ; Castle, David ; Brennan, Leah</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract Background Anorexia Nervosa (AN) is a severe and potentially chronic disorder characterised by low body weight and persistent behaviours that interfere with weight gain. Individuals with AN are often difficult to engage in treatment and display high rates of drop out. The Collaborative Case Conceptualisation (CCC) assessment approach was developed to target proposed AN maintaining factors with the aim of improving treatment motivation and engagement and consequently treatment outcomes in individuals with AN. The proposed study aims to examine the efficacy of CCC in improving a range of outcomes including Body Mass Index, eating disorder symptomatology, general psychopathology, quality of life and future treatment motivation and participation. Potential mediators will also be explored. Methods/design Thirty-two participants will be recruited from Melbourne based specialist eating disorder services, community and university clinics, and health practitioner networks. Participants will be randomised to three individual sessions of either CCC or a standardised assessment condition (assessment as usual; AAU). The AAU assessment will include; a mental status examination, assessment of current disordered eating behaviours and cognitions, assessment of clinical history, and a physical examination. The CCC condition combines the AAU assessment components with shared collaborative formulation and tailored psychoeducation highlighting the consequences of the eating disorder on wellbeing and future goals in a supportive and motivating way. Implications This intervention may provide an effective and feasible method of improving treatment engagement and outcomes for individuals suffering from AN, with the ultimate outcome of reducing the negative biopsychosocial impacts of this potentially severe and chronic disorder.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1551-7144</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1559-2030</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.cct.2015.12.011</identifier><identifier>PMID: 26707946</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Anorexia nervosa ; Anorexia Nervosa - diagnosis ; Anorexia Nervosa - psychology ; Anorexia Nervosa - therapy ; Assessment ; Cardiovascular ; Clinical Protocols ; Follow-Up Studies ; Hematology, Oncology and Palliative Medicine ; Humans ; Motivation ; Patient Education as Topic ; Patient Participation - methods ; Protocol ; Randomised controlled trial ; Research Design ; Treatment Outcome ; Weight Gain</subject><ispartof>Contemporary clinical trials, 2016-03, Vol.47, p.296-303</ispartof><rights>Elsevier Inc.</rights><rights>2016 Elsevier Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c360t-41d89aba89b03bea049a76f7ea2e5973a903d42aaed90d0badb29efcb6c357743</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cct.2015.12.011$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26707946$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Mitchell, Sarah A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Newton, Richard</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Harrison, Philippa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Castle, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brennan, Leah</creatorcontrib><title>Does Collaborative Case Conceptualisation enhance engagement and outcome in the treatment of anorexia nervosa? Rational, design and methods</title><title>Contemporary clinical trials</title><addtitle>Contemp Clin Trials</addtitle><description>Abstract Background Anorexia Nervosa (AN) is a severe and potentially chronic disorder characterised by low body weight and persistent behaviours that interfere with weight gain. Individuals with AN are often difficult to engage in treatment and display high rates of drop out. The Collaborative Case Conceptualisation (CCC) assessment approach was developed to target proposed AN maintaining factors with the aim of improving treatment motivation and engagement and consequently treatment outcomes in individuals with AN. The proposed study aims to examine the efficacy of CCC in improving a range of outcomes including Body Mass Index, eating disorder symptomatology, general psychopathology, quality of life and future treatment motivation and participation. Potential mediators will also be explored. Methods/design Thirty-two participants will be recruited from Melbourne based specialist eating disorder services, community and university clinics, and health practitioner networks. Participants will be randomised to three individual sessions of either CCC or a standardised assessment condition (assessment as usual; AAU). The AAU assessment will include; a mental status examination, assessment of current disordered eating behaviours and cognitions, assessment of clinical history, and a physical examination. The CCC condition combines the AAU assessment components with shared collaborative formulation and tailored psychoeducation highlighting the consequences of the eating disorder on wellbeing and future goals in a supportive and motivating way. Implications This intervention may provide an effective and feasible method of improving treatment engagement and outcomes for individuals suffering from AN, with the ultimate outcome of reducing the negative biopsychosocial impacts of this potentially severe and chronic disorder.</description><subject>Anorexia nervosa</subject><subject>Anorexia Nervosa - diagnosis</subject><subject>Anorexia Nervosa - psychology</subject><subject>Anorexia Nervosa - therapy</subject><subject>Assessment</subject><subject>Cardiovascular</subject><subject>Clinical Protocols</subject><subject>Follow-Up Studies</subject><subject>Hematology, Oncology and Palliative Medicine</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Motivation</subject><subject>Patient Education as Topic</subject><subject>Patient Participation - methods</subject><subject>Protocol</subject><subject>Randomised controlled trial</subject><subject>Research Design</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><subject>Weight Gain</subject><issn>1551-7144</issn><issn>1559-2030</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9UsuO1DAQjBCIfcAHcEE-ciDBdh5eCwmEhoVFWgmJx9nq2J0ZD4k92M6I_QZ-ep2ZXQ4c9uK2uqtK6qouiheMVoyy7s220jpVnLK2YryijD0qTlnbypLTmj4-_FkpWNOcFGcxbimtu7ZrnxYnvBNUyKY7Lf5-9BjJyo8j9D5AsnskK4j58U7jLs0w2pjb3hF0G8i9XNewxgldIuAM8XPSfkJiHUkbJCkgpMPQD3nuA_6xQByGvY_wnnw7aMH4mhiMdu0OEhOmjTfxWfFkgDHi87t6Xvz8dPljdVVef_38ZfXhutR1R1PZMHMhoYcL2dO6R6CNBNENAoFjK0UNktam4QBoJDW0B9NziYPuO123QjT1efHqqLsL_veMManJRo3ZAod-jooJIWS2h4sMZUeoDj7GgIPaBTtBuFGMqiUDtVU5A7VkoBhXOYPMeXknP_cTmn-Me9Mz4O0RgHnJvcWgoraYrTU2YBYz3j4o_-4_th6tsxrGX3iDcevnkP3NW6iYCer7cgTLDbC2pmzZ6RbgTq8d</recordid><startdate>20160301</startdate><enddate>20160301</enddate><creator>Mitchell, Sarah A</creator><creator>Newton, Richard</creator><creator>Harrison, Philippa</creator><creator>Castle, David</creator><creator>Brennan, Leah</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20160301</creationdate><title>Does Collaborative Case Conceptualisation enhance engagement and outcome in the treatment of anorexia nervosa? Rational, design and methods</title><author>Mitchell, Sarah A ; Newton, Richard ; Harrison, Philippa ; Castle, David ; Brennan, Leah</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c360t-41d89aba89b03bea049a76f7ea2e5973a903d42aaed90d0badb29efcb6c357743</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Anorexia nervosa</topic><topic>Anorexia Nervosa - diagnosis</topic><topic>Anorexia Nervosa - psychology</topic><topic>Anorexia Nervosa - therapy</topic><topic>Assessment</topic><topic>Cardiovascular</topic><topic>Clinical Protocols</topic><topic>Follow-Up Studies</topic><topic>Hematology, Oncology and Palliative Medicine</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Motivation</topic><topic>Patient Education as Topic</topic><topic>Patient Participation - methods</topic><topic>Protocol</topic><topic>Randomised controlled trial</topic><topic>Research Design</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><topic>Weight Gain</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Mitchell, Sarah A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Newton, Richard</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Harrison, Philippa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Castle, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brennan, Leah</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Contemporary clinical trials</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Mitchell, Sarah A</au><au>Newton, Richard</au><au>Harrison, Philippa</au><au>Castle, David</au><au>Brennan, Leah</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Does Collaborative Case Conceptualisation enhance engagement and outcome in the treatment of anorexia nervosa? Rational, design and methods</atitle><jtitle>Contemporary clinical trials</jtitle><addtitle>Contemp Clin Trials</addtitle><date>2016-03-01</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>47</volume><spage>296</spage><epage>303</epage><pages>296-303</pages><issn>1551-7144</issn><eissn>1559-2030</eissn><abstract>Abstract Background Anorexia Nervosa (AN) is a severe and potentially chronic disorder characterised by low body weight and persistent behaviours that interfere with weight gain. Individuals with AN are often difficult to engage in treatment and display high rates of drop out. The Collaborative Case Conceptualisation (CCC) assessment approach was developed to target proposed AN maintaining factors with the aim of improving treatment motivation and engagement and consequently treatment outcomes in individuals with AN. The proposed study aims to examine the efficacy of CCC in improving a range of outcomes including Body Mass Index, eating disorder symptomatology, general psychopathology, quality of life and future treatment motivation and participation. Potential mediators will also be explored. Methods/design Thirty-two participants will be recruited from Melbourne based specialist eating disorder services, community and university clinics, and health practitioner networks. Participants will be randomised to three individual sessions of either CCC or a standardised assessment condition (assessment as usual; AAU). The AAU assessment will include; a mental status examination, assessment of current disordered eating behaviours and cognitions, assessment of clinical history, and a physical examination. The CCC condition combines the AAU assessment components with shared collaborative formulation and tailored psychoeducation highlighting the consequences of the eating disorder on wellbeing and future goals in a supportive and motivating way. Implications This intervention may provide an effective and feasible method of improving treatment engagement and outcomes for individuals suffering from AN, with the ultimate outcome of reducing the negative biopsychosocial impacts of this potentially severe and chronic disorder.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>26707946</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.cct.2015.12.011</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1551-7144 |
ispartof | Contemporary clinical trials, 2016-03, Vol.47, p.296-303 |
issn | 1551-7144 1559-2030 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1777979427 |
source | MEDLINE; Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier) |
subjects | Anorexia nervosa Anorexia Nervosa - diagnosis Anorexia Nervosa - psychology Anorexia Nervosa - therapy Assessment Cardiovascular Clinical Protocols Follow-Up Studies Hematology, Oncology and Palliative Medicine Humans Motivation Patient Education as Topic Patient Participation - methods Protocol Randomised controlled trial Research Design Treatment Outcome Weight Gain |
title | Does Collaborative Case Conceptualisation enhance engagement and outcome in the treatment of anorexia nervosa? Rational, design and methods |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-29T12%3A57%3A47IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Does%20Collaborative%20Case%20Conceptualisation%20enhance%20engagement%20and%20outcome%20in%20the%20treatment%20of%20anorexia%20nervosa?%20Rational,%20design%20and%20methods&rft.jtitle=Contemporary%20clinical%20trials&rft.au=Mitchell,%20Sarah%20A&rft.date=2016-03-01&rft.volume=47&rft.spage=296&rft.epage=303&rft.pages=296-303&rft.issn=1551-7144&rft.eissn=1559-2030&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.cct.2015.12.011&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1777979427%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1777979427&rft_id=info:pmid/26707946&rft_els_id=S1551714415301427&rfr_iscdi=true |